Can this inequality regarding odd perfect numbers be improved?
$begingroup$
Let $sigma(x)$ denote the sum of the divisors of $x$. Denote the deficiency of $x$ by $D(x)=2x-sigma(x)$.
If $N$ is odd and $sigma(N)=2N$, then $N$ is called an odd perfect number. Euler showed that an odd perfect number, if one exists, must necessarily have the so-called Eulerian form $N=q^k n^2$, where $q$ is the special/Euler prime satisfying $q equiv k equiv 1 pmod 4$ and $gcd(q,n)=1$.
Since $k equiv 1 pmod 4$ and $q$ is prime, we obtain
$$sigma(q^k) = frac{q^{k+1}-1}{q-1} = bigg(frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}}-1}{q-1}bigg)bigg(q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1bigg).$$
But we can rewrite the first factor as
$$frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}}-1}{q-1} = frac{q^{frac{k-1}{2}+1}-1}{q-1} = sigma(q^{frac{k-1}{2}}),$$
so that we have
$$sigma(q^k) = sigma(q^{frac{k-1}{2}})bigg(q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1bigg).$$
Note that the divisor-sum function $sigma$ satisfies $sigma(yz) leq sigma(y)sigma(z)$, where equality holds if and only if $gcd(y,z)=1$. Setting $y=z=q^{frac{k-1}{2}}$ and noting that $gcd(y,z)=q^{frac{k-1}{2}}>1$ (unless $k=1$), we obtain
$$sqrt{sigma(q^{k-1})} < sigma(q^{frac{k-1}{2}}).$$
Now, it is known that
$$frac{2n^2}{sigma(q^k)}=frac{sigma(n^2)}{q^k}$$
from which it follows that
$$frac{D(n^2)}{sigma(q^{k-1})}=frac{2n^2 - sigma(n^2)}{sigma(q^k) - q^k}=frac{2n^2}{sigma(q^k)},$$
whereby we obtain
$$frac{2n^2}{D(n^2)}=frac{sigma(q^k)}{sigma(q^{k-1})}=frac{sigma(q^{frac{k-1}{2}})bigg(q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1bigg)}{sigma(q^{k-1})}>frac{sqrt{sigma(q^{k-1})}bigg(q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1bigg)}{sigma(q^{k-1})}=frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1}{sqrt{sigma(q^{k-1})}}.$$
This implies that
$$frac{n^2}{D(n^2)}>frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1}{2sqrt{sigma(q^{k-1})}}.$$
We now claim the following proposition.
If $q^k n^2$ is an odd perfect number with special/Euler prime $q$, then
$$frac{sigma(n^2)}{n^2} leq frac{2q}{q+1}.$$
Equality holds if and only if $k=1$.
Proof
$$sigma(q^k)sigma(n^2)=sigma(q^k n^2)=2q^k n^2$$
$$frac{q+1}{q}=frac{sigma(q)}{q} leq frac{sigma(q^k)}{q^k}=frac{2n^2}{sigma(n^2)}$$
implying
$$frac{sigma(n^2)}{n^2} leq frac{2q}{q+1}.$$
Equality holds if and only if $k=1$.
From the inequality
$$frac{sigma(n^2)}{n^2} leq frac{2q}{q+1}$$
we obtain
$$(q+1)sigma(n^2) leq 2qn^2$$
which implies that
$$2n^2 leq 2qn^2 + 2n^2 - qsigma(n^2) - sigma(n^2) = {2n^2}(q+1) - (q+1)sigma(n^2) = (q+1)(2n^2 - sigma(n^2)) = (q+1)D(n^2)$$
from which it follows that
$$frac{n^2}{D(n^2)} leq frac{q+1}{2}.$$
Equality holds if and only if $k=1$.
Now assume that $k>1$. It follows from our previous considerations in this post that
$$frac{q+1}{2}>frac{n^2}{D(n^2)}>frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1}{2sqrt{sigma(q^{k-1})}}$$
which implies that
$$sqrt{sigma(q^{k-1})}>frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1}{q+1}$$
from which it follows that
$$frac{q^k - 1}{q - 1}=sigma(q^{k-1})>bigg(frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1}{q+1}bigg)^2.$$
Since $k>1$ and $k equiv 1 pmod 4$, then the lowest possible value of $k$ is $5$. Plugging this as a test value, we obtain
$$frac{q^5 - 1}{q - 1}=q^4 + q^3 + q^2 + q + 1$$
and
$$bigg(frac{q^3 + 1}{q + 1}bigg)^2 = (q^2 - q + 1)^2 = q^4 - 2q^3 + 3q^2 - 2q + 1$$
so that we get
$$q^4 + q^3 + q^2 + q + 1 > q^4 - 2q^3 + 3q^2 - 2q + 1$$
which simplifies to
$$3q^3 - 2q^2 + 3q = q(q(3q - 2) + 3) > 0$$
which is trivially true as it is known that $q geq 5$ (since $q$ is a prime satisfying $q equiv 1 pmod 4$). Indeed, by a lengthy (but doable) computation, it is possible to show that the inequality
$$frac{q^k - 1}{q - 1}=sigma(q^{k-1})>bigg(frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1}{q+1}bigg)^2$$
is trivial.
Here is my question:
The crux of the inequalities in this post is
$$sqrt{sigma(q^{k-1})} < sigma(q^{frac{k-1}{2}}).$$
Will it be possible to improve on this inequality, by a similar reasoning for the derivation of the inequality
$$bigg(frac{sigma(n^2)}{n^2}bigg)^{frac{ln(4/3)}{ln(13/9)}} < frac{sigma(n)}{n},$$
as detailed in this MSE question?
elementary-number-theory inequality upper-lower-bounds divisor-sum perfect-numbers
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $sigma(x)$ denote the sum of the divisors of $x$. Denote the deficiency of $x$ by $D(x)=2x-sigma(x)$.
If $N$ is odd and $sigma(N)=2N$, then $N$ is called an odd perfect number. Euler showed that an odd perfect number, if one exists, must necessarily have the so-called Eulerian form $N=q^k n^2$, where $q$ is the special/Euler prime satisfying $q equiv k equiv 1 pmod 4$ and $gcd(q,n)=1$.
Since $k equiv 1 pmod 4$ and $q$ is prime, we obtain
$$sigma(q^k) = frac{q^{k+1}-1}{q-1} = bigg(frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}}-1}{q-1}bigg)bigg(q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1bigg).$$
But we can rewrite the first factor as
$$frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}}-1}{q-1} = frac{q^{frac{k-1}{2}+1}-1}{q-1} = sigma(q^{frac{k-1}{2}}),$$
so that we have
$$sigma(q^k) = sigma(q^{frac{k-1}{2}})bigg(q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1bigg).$$
Note that the divisor-sum function $sigma$ satisfies $sigma(yz) leq sigma(y)sigma(z)$, where equality holds if and only if $gcd(y,z)=1$. Setting $y=z=q^{frac{k-1}{2}}$ and noting that $gcd(y,z)=q^{frac{k-1}{2}}>1$ (unless $k=1$), we obtain
$$sqrt{sigma(q^{k-1})} < sigma(q^{frac{k-1}{2}}).$$
Now, it is known that
$$frac{2n^2}{sigma(q^k)}=frac{sigma(n^2)}{q^k}$$
from which it follows that
$$frac{D(n^2)}{sigma(q^{k-1})}=frac{2n^2 - sigma(n^2)}{sigma(q^k) - q^k}=frac{2n^2}{sigma(q^k)},$$
whereby we obtain
$$frac{2n^2}{D(n^2)}=frac{sigma(q^k)}{sigma(q^{k-1})}=frac{sigma(q^{frac{k-1}{2}})bigg(q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1bigg)}{sigma(q^{k-1})}>frac{sqrt{sigma(q^{k-1})}bigg(q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1bigg)}{sigma(q^{k-1})}=frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1}{sqrt{sigma(q^{k-1})}}.$$
This implies that
$$frac{n^2}{D(n^2)}>frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1}{2sqrt{sigma(q^{k-1})}}.$$
We now claim the following proposition.
If $q^k n^2$ is an odd perfect number with special/Euler prime $q$, then
$$frac{sigma(n^2)}{n^2} leq frac{2q}{q+1}.$$
Equality holds if and only if $k=1$.
Proof
$$sigma(q^k)sigma(n^2)=sigma(q^k n^2)=2q^k n^2$$
$$frac{q+1}{q}=frac{sigma(q)}{q} leq frac{sigma(q^k)}{q^k}=frac{2n^2}{sigma(n^2)}$$
implying
$$frac{sigma(n^2)}{n^2} leq frac{2q}{q+1}.$$
Equality holds if and only if $k=1$.
From the inequality
$$frac{sigma(n^2)}{n^2} leq frac{2q}{q+1}$$
we obtain
$$(q+1)sigma(n^2) leq 2qn^2$$
which implies that
$$2n^2 leq 2qn^2 + 2n^2 - qsigma(n^2) - sigma(n^2) = {2n^2}(q+1) - (q+1)sigma(n^2) = (q+1)(2n^2 - sigma(n^2)) = (q+1)D(n^2)$$
from which it follows that
$$frac{n^2}{D(n^2)} leq frac{q+1}{2}.$$
Equality holds if and only if $k=1$.
Now assume that $k>1$. It follows from our previous considerations in this post that
$$frac{q+1}{2}>frac{n^2}{D(n^2)}>frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1}{2sqrt{sigma(q^{k-1})}}$$
which implies that
$$sqrt{sigma(q^{k-1})}>frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1}{q+1}$$
from which it follows that
$$frac{q^k - 1}{q - 1}=sigma(q^{k-1})>bigg(frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1}{q+1}bigg)^2.$$
Since $k>1$ and $k equiv 1 pmod 4$, then the lowest possible value of $k$ is $5$. Plugging this as a test value, we obtain
$$frac{q^5 - 1}{q - 1}=q^4 + q^3 + q^2 + q + 1$$
and
$$bigg(frac{q^3 + 1}{q + 1}bigg)^2 = (q^2 - q + 1)^2 = q^4 - 2q^3 + 3q^2 - 2q + 1$$
so that we get
$$q^4 + q^3 + q^2 + q + 1 > q^4 - 2q^3 + 3q^2 - 2q + 1$$
which simplifies to
$$3q^3 - 2q^2 + 3q = q(q(3q - 2) + 3) > 0$$
which is trivially true as it is known that $q geq 5$ (since $q$ is a prime satisfying $q equiv 1 pmod 4$). Indeed, by a lengthy (but doable) computation, it is possible to show that the inequality
$$frac{q^k - 1}{q - 1}=sigma(q^{k-1})>bigg(frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1}{q+1}bigg)^2$$
is trivial.
Here is my question:
The crux of the inequalities in this post is
$$sqrt{sigma(q^{k-1})} < sigma(q^{frac{k-1}{2}}).$$
Will it be possible to improve on this inequality, by a similar reasoning for the derivation of the inequality
$$bigg(frac{sigma(n^2)}{n^2}bigg)^{frac{ln(4/3)}{ln(13/9)}} < frac{sigma(n)}{n},$$
as detailed in this MSE question?
elementary-number-theory inequality upper-lower-bounds divisor-sum perfect-numbers
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I conjecture that $$bigg(sigma(q^{k-1})bigg)^{frac{ln(6/5)}{ln(31/25)}} < sigma(q^{frac{k-1}{2}})$$ but I have no proof.
$endgroup$
– Jose Arnaldo Bebita-Dris
Jan 9 at 12:34
$begingroup$
If this conjecture is true, then the resulting inequality is $$frac{q^k - 1}{q - 1} > bigg(frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}+1}}{q+1}bigg)^{frac{ln(31/25)}{ln(31/30)}}$$ where the exponent $$frac{ln(31/25)}{ln(31/30)} approx 6.5603093$$ I am not 100% sure, but I think this last inequality will lead to a contradiction, thereby yielding a proof of the Descartes-Frenicle-Sorli Conjecture that $k=1$, if $q^k n^2$ is an odd perfect number with special/Euler prime $q$.
$endgroup$
– Jose Arnaldo Bebita-Dris
Jan 9 at 13:08
$begingroup$
The conjecture is false. The following counterexample was communicated to me by Pascal Ochem. (He adds that the inequality cannot be improved much.) With $q = 40009$ and $k = 5$: $$(q^4+q^3+q^2+q+1)^{1/2} = 1600740085.875$$ $$q^2+q+1 = 1600760091$$ $$(q^4+q^3+q^2+q+1)^{log(6/5)/log(31/25)} = 4004779171150154.163$$
$endgroup$
– Jose Arnaldo Bebita-Dris
Jan 10 at 1:35
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $sigma(x)$ denote the sum of the divisors of $x$. Denote the deficiency of $x$ by $D(x)=2x-sigma(x)$.
If $N$ is odd and $sigma(N)=2N$, then $N$ is called an odd perfect number. Euler showed that an odd perfect number, if one exists, must necessarily have the so-called Eulerian form $N=q^k n^2$, where $q$ is the special/Euler prime satisfying $q equiv k equiv 1 pmod 4$ and $gcd(q,n)=1$.
Since $k equiv 1 pmod 4$ and $q$ is prime, we obtain
$$sigma(q^k) = frac{q^{k+1}-1}{q-1} = bigg(frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}}-1}{q-1}bigg)bigg(q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1bigg).$$
But we can rewrite the first factor as
$$frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}}-1}{q-1} = frac{q^{frac{k-1}{2}+1}-1}{q-1} = sigma(q^{frac{k-1}{2}}),$$
so that we have
$$sigma(q^k) = sigma(q^{frac{k-1}{2}})bigg(q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1bigg).$$
Note that the divisor-sum function $sigma$ satisfies $sigma(yz) leq sigma(y)sigma(z)$, where equality holds if and only if $gcd(y,z)=1$. Setting $y=z=q^{frac{k-1}{2}}$ and noting that $gcd(y,z)=q^{frac{k-1}{2}}>1$ (unless $k=1$), we obtain
$$sqrt{sigma(q^{k-1})} < sigma(q^{frac{k-1}{2}}).$$
Now, it is known that
$$frac{2n^2}{sigma(q^k)}=frac{sigma(n^2)}{q^k}$$
from which it follows that
$$frac{D(n^2)}{sigma(q^{k-1})}=frac{2n^2 - sigma(n^2)}{sigma(q^k) - q^k}=frac{2n^2}{sigma(q^k)},$$
whereby we obtain
$$frac{2n^2}{D(n^2)}=frac{sigma(q^k)}{sigma(q^{k-1})}=frac{sigma(q^{frac{k-1}{2}})bigg(q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1bigg)}{sigma(q^{k-1})}>frac{sqrt{sigma(q^{k-1})}bigg(q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1bigg)}{sigma(q^{k-1})}=frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1}{sqrt{sigma(q^{k-1})}}.$$
This implies that
$$frac{n^2}{D(n^2)}>frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1}{2sqrt{sigma(q^{k-1})}}.$$
We now claim the following proposition.
If $q^k n^2$ is an odd perfect number with special/Euler prime $q$, then
$$frac{sigma(n^2)}{n^2} leq frac{2q}{q+1}.$$
Equality holds if and only if $k=1$.
Proof
$$sigma(q^k)sigma(n^2)=sigma(q^k n^2)=2q^k n^2$$
$$frac{q+1}{q}=frac{sigma(q)}{q} leq frac{sigma(q^k)}{q^k}=frac{2n^2}{sigma(n^2)}$$
implying
$$frac{sigma(n^2)}{n^2} leq frac{2q}{q+1}.$$
Equality holds if and only if $k=1$.
From the inequality
$$frac{sigma(n^2)}{n^2} leq frac{2q}{q+1}$$
we obtain
$$(q+1)sigma(n^2) leq 2qn^2$$
which implies that
$$2n^2 leq 2qn^2 + 2n^2 - qsigma(n^2) - sigma(n^2) = {2n^2}(q+1) - (q+1)sigma(n^2) = (q+1)(2n^2 - sigma(n^2)) = (q+1)D(n^2)$$
from which it follows that
$$frac{n^2}{D(n^2)} leq frac{q+1}{2}.$$
Equality holds if and only if $k=1$.
Now assume that $k>1$. It follows from our previous considerations in this post that
$$frac{q+1}{2}>frac{n^2}{D(n^2)}>frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1}{2sqrt{sigma(q^{k-1})}}$$
which implies that
$$sqrt{sigma(q^{k-1})}>frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1}{q+1}$$
from which it follows that
$$frac{q^k - 1}{q - 1}=sigma(q^{k-1})>bigg(frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1}{q+1}bigg)^2.$$
Since $k>1$ and $k equiv 1 pmod 4$, then the lowest possible value of $k$ is $5$. Plugging this as a test value, we obtain
$$frac{q^5 - 1}{q - 1}=q^4 + q^3 + q^2 + q + 1$$
and
$$bigg(frac{q^3 + 1}{q + 1}bigg)^2 = (q^2 - q + 1)^2 = q^4 - 2q^3 + 3q^2 - 2q + 1$$
so that we get
$$q^4 + q^3 + q^2 + q + 1 > q^4 - 2q^3 + 3q^2 - 2q + 1$$
which simplifies to
$$3q^3 - 2q^2 + 3q = q(q(3q - 2) + 3) > 0$$
which is trivially true as it is known that $q geq 5$ (since $q$ is a prime satisfying $q equiv 1 pmod 4$). Indeed, by a lengthy (but doable) computation, it is possible to show that the inequality
$$frac{q^k - 1}{q - 1}=sigma(q^{k-1})>bigg(frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1}{q+1}bigg)^2$$
is trivial.
Here is my question:
The crux of the inequalities in this post is
$$sqrt{sigma(q^{k-1})} < sigma(q^{frac{k-1}{2}}).$$
Will it be possible to improve on this inequality, by a similar reasoning for the derivation of the inequality
$$bigg(frac{sigma(n^2)}{n^2}bigg)^{frac{ln(4/3)}{ln(13/9)}} < frac{sigma(n)}{n},$$
as detailed in this MSE question?
elementary-number-theory inequality upper-lower-bounds divisor-sum perfect-numbers
$endgroup$
Let $sigma(x)$ denote the sum of the divisors of $x$. Denote the deficiency of $x$ by $D(x)=2x-sigma(x)$.
If $N$ is odd and $sigma(N)=2N$, then $N$ is called an odd perfect number. Euler showed that an odd perfect number, if one exists, must necessarily have the so-called Eulerian form $N=q^k n^2$, where $q$ is the special/Euler prime satisfying $q equiv k equiv 1 pmod 4$ and $gcd(q,n)=1$.
Since $k equiv 1 pmod 4$ and $q$ is prime, we obtain
$$sigma(q^k) = frac{q^{k+1}-1}{q-1} = bigg(frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}}-1}{q-1}bigg)bigg(q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1bigg).$$
But we can rewrite the first factor as
$$frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}}-1}{q-1} = frac{q^{frac{k-1}{2}+1}-1}{q-1} = sigma(q^{frac{k-1}{2}}),$$
so that we have
$$sigma(q^k) = sigma(q^{frac{k-1}{2}})bigg(q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1bigg).$$
Note that the divisor-sum function $sigma$ satisfies $sigma(yz) leq sigma(y)sigma(z)$, where equality holds if and only if $gcd(y,z)=1$. Setting $y=z=q^{frac{k-1}{2}}$ and noting that $gcd(y,z)=q^{frac{k-1}{2}}>1$ (unless $k=1$), we obtain
$$sqrt{sigma(q^{k-1})} < sigma(q^{frac{k-1}{2}}).$$
Now, it is known that
$$frac{2n^2}{sigma(q^k)}=frac{sigma(n^2)}{q^k}$$
from which it follows that
$$frac{D(n^2)}{sigma(q^{k-1})}=frac{2n^2 - sigma(n^2)}{sigma(q^k) - q^k}=frac{2n^2}{sigma(q^k)},$$
whereby we obtain
$$frac{2n^2}{D(n^2)}=frac{sigma(q^k)}{sigma(q^{k-1})}=frac{sigma(q^{frac{k-1}{2}})bigg(q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1bigg)}{sigma(q^{k-1})}>frac{sqrt{sigma(q^{k-1})}bigg(q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1bigg)}{sigma(q^{k-1})}=frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1}{sqrt{sigma(q^{k-1})}}.$$
This implies that
$$frac{n^2}{D(n^2)}>frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1}{2sqrt{sigma(q^{k-1})}}.$$
We now claim the following proposition.
If $q^k n^2$ is an odd perfect number with special/Euler prime $q$, then
$$frac{sigma(n^2)}{n^2} leq frac{2q}{q+1}.$$
Equality holds if and only if $k=1$.
Proof
$$sigma(q^k)sigma(n^2)=sigma(q^k n^2)=2q^k n^2$$
$$frac{q+1}{q}=frac{sigma(q)}{q} leq frac{sigma(q^k)}{q^k}=frac{2n^2}{sigma(n^2)}$$
implying
$$frac{sigma(n^2)}{n^2} leq frac{2q}{q+1}.$$
Equality holds if and only if $k=1$.
From the inequality
$$frac{sigma(n^2)}{n^2} leq frac{2q}{q+1}$$
we obtain
$$(q+1)sigma(n^2) leq 2qn^2$$
which implies that
$$2n^2 leq 2qn^2 + 2n^2 - qsigma(n^2) - sigma(n^2) = {2n^2}(q+1) - (q+1)sigma(n^2) = (q+1)(2n^2 - sigma(n^2)) = (q+1)D(n^2)$$
from which it follows that
$$frac{n^2}{D(n^2)} leq frac{q+1}{2}.$$
Equality holds if and only if $k=1$.
Now assume that $k>1$. It follows from our previous considerations in this post that
$$frac{q+1}{2}>frac{n^2}{D(n^2)}>frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1}{2sqrt{sigma(q^{k-1})}}$$
which implies that
$$sqrt{sigma(q^{k-1})}>frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1}{q+1}$$
from which it follows that
$$frac{q^k - 1}{q - 1}=sigma(q^{k-1})>bigg(frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1}{q+1}bigg)^2.$$
Since $k>1$ and $k equiv 1 pmod 4$, then the lowest possible value of $k$ is $5$. Plugging this as a test value, we obtain
$$frac{q^5 - 1}{q - 1}=q^4 + q^3 + q^2 + q + 1$$
and
$$bigg(frac{q^3 + 1}{q + 1}bigg)^2 = (q^2 - q + 1)^2 = q^4 - 2q^3 + 3q^2 - 2q + 1$$
so that we get
$$q^4 + q^3 + q^2 + q + 1 > q^4 - 2q^3 + 3q^2 - 2q + 1$$
which simplifies to
$$3q^3 - 2q^2 + 3q = q(q(3q - 2) + 3) > 0$$
which is trivially true as it is known that $q geq 5$ (since $q$ is a prime satisfying $q equiv 1 pmod 4$). Indeed, by a lengthy (but doable) computation, it is possible to show that the inequality
$$frac{q^k - 1}{q - 1}=sigma(q^{k-1})>bigg(frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}}+1}{q+1}bigg)^2$$
is trivial.
Here is my question:
The crux of the inequalities in this post is
$$sqrt{sigma(q^{k-1})} < sigma(q^{frac{k-1}{2}}).$$
Will it be possible to improve on this inequality, by a similar reasoning for the derivation of the inequality
$$bigg(frac{sigma(n^2)}{n^2}bigg)^{frac{ln(4/3)}{ln(13/9)}} < frac{sigma(n)}{n},$$
as detailed in this MSE question?
elementary-number-theory inequality upper-lower-bounds divisor-sum perfect-numbers
elementary-number-theory inequality upper-lower-bounds divisor-sum perfect-numbers
asked Jan 9 at 11:46
Jose Arnaldo Bebita-DrisJose Arnaldo Bebita-Dris
5,26952045
5,26952045
$begingroup$
I conjecture that $$bigg(sigma(q^{k-1})bigg)^{frac{ln(6/5)}{ln(31/25)}} < sigma(q^{frac{k-1}{2}})$$ but I have no proof.
$endgroup$
– Jose Arnaldo Bebita-Dris
Jan 9 at 12:34
$begingroup$
If this conjecture is true, then the resulting inequality is $$frac{q^k - 1}{q - 1} > bigg(frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}+1}}{q+1}bigg)^{frac{ln(31/25)}{ln(31/30)}}$$ where the exponent $$frac{ln(31/25)}{ln(31/30)} approx 6.5603093$$ I am not 100% sure, but I think this last inequality will lead to a contradiction, thereby yielding a proof of the Descartes-Frenicle-Sorli Conjecture that $k=1$, if $q^k n^2$ is an odd perfect number with special/Euler prime $q$.
$endgroup$
– Jose Arnaldo Bebita-Dris
Jan 9 at 13:08
$begingroup$
The conjecture is false. The following counterexample was communicated to me by Pascal Ochem. (He adds that the inequality cannot be improved much.) With $q = 40009$ and $k = 5$: $$(q^4+q^3+q^2+q+1)^{1/2} = 1600740085.875$$ $$q^2+q+1 = 1600760091$$ $$(q^4+q^3+q^2+q+1)^{log(6/5)/log(31/25)} = 4004779171150154.163$$
$endgroup$
– Jose Arnaldo Bebita-Dris
Jan 10 at 1:35
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I conjecture that $$bigg(sigma(q^{k-1})bigg)^{frac{ln(6/5)}{ln(31/25)}} < sigma(q^{frac{k-1}{2}})$$ but I have no proof.
$endgroup$
– Jose Arnaldo Bebita-Dris
Jan 9 at 12:34
$begingroup$
If this conjecture is true, then the resulting inequality is $$frac{q^k - 1}{q - 1} > bigg(frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}+1}}{q+1}bigg)^{frac{ln(31/25)}{ln(31/30)}}$$ where the exponent $$frac{ln(31/25)}{ln(31/30)} approx 6.5603093$$ I am not 100% sure, but I think this last inequality will lead to a contradiction, thereby yielding a proof of the Descartes-Frenicle-Sorli Conjecture that $k=1$, if $q^k n^2$ is an odd perfect number with special/Euler prime $q$.
$endgroup$
– Jose Arnaldo Bebita-Dris
Jan 9 at 13:08
$begingroup$
The conjecture is false. The following counterexample was communicated to me by Pascal Ochem. (He adds that the inequality cannot be improved much.) With $q = 40009$ and $k = 5$: $$(q^4+q^3+q^2+q+1)^{1/2} = 1600740085.875$$ $$q^2+q+1 = 1600760091$$ $$(q^4+q^3+q^2+q+1)^{log(6/5)/log(31/25)} = 4004779171150154.163$$
$endgroup$
– Jose Arnaldo Bebita-Dris
Jan 10 at 1:35
$begingroup$
I conjecture that $$bigg(sigma(q^{k-1})bigg)^{frac{ln(6/5)}{ln(31/25)}} < sigma(q^{frac{k-1}{2}})$$ but I have no proof.
$endgroup$
– Jose Arnaldo Bebita-Dris
Jan 9 at 12:34
$begingroup$
I conjecture that $$bigg(sigma(q^{k-1})bigg)^{frac{ln(6/5)}{ln(31/25)}} < sigma(q^{frac{k-1}{2}})$$ but I have no proof.
$endgroup$
– Jose Arnaldo Bebita-Dris
Jan 9 at 12:34
$begingroup$
If this conjecture is true, then the resulting inequality is $$frac{q^k - 1}{q - 1} > bigg(frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}+1}}{q+1}bigg)^{frac{ln(31/25)}{ln(31/30)}}$$ where the exponent $$frac{ln(31/25)}{ln(31/30)} approx 6.5603093$$ I am not 100% sure, but I think this last inequality will lead to a contradiction, thereby yielding a proof of the Descartes-Frenicle-Sorli Conjecture that $k=1$, if $q^k n^2$ is an odd perfect number with special/Euler prime $q$.
$endgroup$
– Jose Arnaldo Bebita-Dris
Jan 9 at 13:08
$begingroup$
If this conjecture is true, then the resulting inequality is $$frac{q^k - 1}{q - 1} > bigg(frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}+1}}{q+1}bigg)^{frac{ln(31/25)}{ln(31/30)}}$$ where the exponent $$frac{ln(31/25)}{ln(31/30)} approx 6.5603093$$ I am not 100% sure, but I think this last inequality will lead to a contradiction, thereby yielding a proof of the Descartes-Frenicle-Sorli Conjecture that $k=1$, if $q^k n^2$ is an odd perfect number with special/Euler prime $q$.
$endgroup$
– Jose Arnaldo Bebita-Dris
Jan 9 at 13:08
$begingroup$
The conjecture is false. The following counterexample was communicated to me by Pascal Ochem. (He adds that the inequality cannot be improved much.) With $q = 40009$ and $k = 5$: $$(q^4+q^3+q^2+q+1)^{1/2} = 1600740085.875$$ $$q^2+q+1 = 1600760091$$ $$(q^4+q^3+q^2+q+1)^{log(6/5)/log(31/25)} = 4004779171150154.163$$
$endgroup$
– Jose Arnaldo Bebita-Dris
Jan 10 at 1:35
$begingroup$
The conjecture is false. The following counterexample was communicated to me by Pascal Ochem. (He adds that the inequality cannot be improved much.) With $q = 40009$ and $k = 5$: $$(q^4+q^3+q^2+q+1)^{1/2} = 1600740085.875$$ $$q^2+q+1 = 1600760091$$ $$(q^4+q^3+q^2+q+1)^{log(6/5)/log(31/25)} = 4004779171150154.163$$
$endgroup$
– Jose Arnaldo Bebita-Dris
Jan 10 at 1:35
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The conjecture in the comments is false. The following counterexample was communicated to me by Pascal Ochem. (He adds that the inequality
$$sqrt{sigma(q^{k-1})} < sigma(q^{frac{k-1}{2}})$$
cannot be improved much.)
With $q = 40009$ and $k = 5$:
$$(q^4+q^3+q^2+q+1)^{1/2} = 1600740085.875$$
$$q^2+q+1 = 1600760091$$
$$(q^4+q^3+q^2+q+1)^{log(6/5)/log(31/25)} = 4004779171150154.163$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3067360%2fcan-this-inequality-regarding-odd-perfect-numbers-be-improved%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The conjecture in the comments is false. The following counterexample was communicated to me by Pascal Ochem. (He adds that the inequality
$$sqrt{sigma(q^{k-1})} < sigma(q^{frac{k-1}{2}})$$
cannot be improved much.)
With $q = 40009$ and $k = 5$:
$$(q^4+q^3+q^2+q+1)^{1/2} = 1600740085.875$$
$$q^2+q+1 = 1600760091$$
$$(q^4+q^3+q^2+q+1)^{log(6/5)/log(31/25)} = 4004779171150154.163$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The conjecture in the comments is false. The following counterexample was communicated to me by Pascal Ochem. (He adds that the inequality
$$sqrt{sigma(q^{k-1})} < sigma(q^{frac{k-1}{2}})$$
cannot be improved much.)
With $q = 40009$ and $k = 5$:
$$(q^4+q^3+q^2+q+1)^{1/2} = 1600740085.875$$
$$q^2+q+1 = 1600760091$$
$$(q^4+q^3+q^2+q+1)^{log(6/5)/log(31/25)} = 4004779171150154.163$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The conjecture in the comments is false. The following counterexample was communicated to me by Pascal Ochem. (He adds that the inequality
$$sqrt{sigma(q^{k-1})} < sigma(q^{frac{k-1}{2}})$$
cannot be improved much.)
With $q = 40009$ and $k = 5$:
$$(q^4+q^3+q^2+q+1)^{1/2} = 1600740085.875$$
$$q^2+q+1 = 1600760091$$
$$(q^4+q^3+q^2+q+1)^{log(6/5)/log(31/25)} = 4004779171150154.163$$
$endgroup$
The conjecture in the comments is false. The following counterexample was communicated to me by Pascal Ochem. (He adds that the inequality
$$sqrt{sigma(q^{k-1})} < sigma(q^{frac{k-1}{2}})$$
cannot be improved much.)
With $q = 40009$ and $k = 5$:
$$(q^4+q^3+q^2+q+1)^{1/2} = 1600740085.875$$
$$q^2+q+1 = 1600760091$$
$$(q^4+q^3+q^2+q+1)^{log(6/5)/log(31/25)} = 4004779171150154.163$$
answered Jan 10 at 1:40
Jose Arnaldo Bebita-DrisJose Arnaldo Bebita-Dris
5,26952045
5,26952045
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3067360%2fcan-this-inequality-regarding-odd-perfect-numbers-be-improved%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
I conjecture that $$bigg(sigma(q^{k-1})bigg)^{frac{ln(6/5)}{ln(31/25)}} < sigma(q^{frac{k-1}{2}})$$ but I have no proof.
$endgroup$
– Jose Arnaldo Bebita-Dris
Jan 9 at 12:34
$begingroup$
If this conjecture is true, then the resulting inequality is $$frac{q^k - 1}{q - 1} > bigg(frac{q^{frac{k+1}{2}+1}}{q+1}bigg)^{frac{ln(31/25)}{ln(31/30)}}$$ where the exponent $$frac{ln(31/25)}{ln(31/30)} approx 6.5603093$$ I am not 100% sure, but I think this last inequality will lead to a contradiction, thereby yielding a proof of the Descartes-Frenicle-Sorli Conjecture that $k=1$, if $q^k n^2$ is an odd perfect number with special/Euler prime $q$.
$endgroup$
– Jose Arnaldo Bebita-Dris
Jan 9 at 13:08
$begingroup$
The conjecture is false. The following counterexample was communicated to me by Pascal Ochem. (He adds that the inequality cannot be improved much.) With $q = 40009$ and $k = 5$: $$(q^4+q^3+q^2+q+1)^{1/2} = 1600740085.875$$ $$q^2+q+1 = 1600760091$$ $$(q^4+q^3+q^2+q+1)^{log(6/5)/log(31/25)} = 4004779171150154.163$$
$endgroup$
– Jose Arnaldo Bebita-Dris
Jan 10 at 1:35