Interface as functions in Kotlin
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
I am working on an android library that contains some views. Naturally these views can emit events.
I have an interface called (just for the purpose of this question) Listener. If I wrote the library in Java things would look like this:
public interface Listener {
void onEvent();
}
public class SomeView extends FrameLayout {
// Some more functions and implementation details
public void setListener(Listener l) { ... }
}
When using this view in a Kotlin activity I can use the setListener like this:
someViewInstance.setListener {
// implementation
}
I want to write my library in Kotlin, but it might be used in Java code as well, so I want to provide and interface for the listener just like a regular view (like above) but have the option for Kotlin code to use the function implementation:
interface Listener {
fun onEvent()
}
when I try to use setListener like above in my Kotlin test activity I get a compilation error saying that the function expects type Listener but got () -> Unit.
Is there a way to enable this kind of implementation in Kotlin without having to create a new function for this?
I thought about having just one function that receives () -> Unit but then it look weird in the Java code (Function1 etc.).
Thanks!
add a comment |
I am working on an android library that contains some views. Naturally these views can emit events.
I have an interface called (just for the purpose of this question) Listener. If I wrote the library in Java things would look like this:
public interface Listener {
void onEvent();
}
public class SomeView extends FrameLayout {
// Some more functions and implementation details
public void setListener(Listener l) { ... }
}
When using this view in a Kotlin activity I can use the setListener like this:
someViewInstance.setListener {
// implementation
}
I want to write my library in Kotlin, but it might be used in Java code as well, so I want to provide and interface for the listener just like a regular view (like above) but have the option for Kotlin code to use the function implementation:
interface Listener {
fun onEvent()
}
when I try to use setListener like above in my Kotlin test activity I get a compilation error saying that the function expects type Listener but got () -> Unit.
Is there a way to enable this kind of implementation in Kotlin without having to create a new function for this?
I thought about having just one function that receives () -> Unit but then it look weird in the Java code (Function1 etc.).
Thanks!
You might wanna check this link : kotlinlang.org/docs/reference/lambdas.html
– Jeel Vankhede
Mar 12 at 8:27
add a comment |
I am working on an android library that contains some views. Naturally these views can emit events.
I have an interface called (just for the purpose of this question) Listener. If I wrote the library in Java things would look like this:
public interface Listener {
void onEvent();
}
public class SomeView extends FrameLayout {
// Some more functions and implementation details
public void setListener(Listener l) { ... }
}
When using this view in a Kotlin activity I can use the setListener like this:
someViewInstance.setListener {
// implementation
}
I want to write my library in Kotlin, but it might be used in Java code as well, so I want to provide and interface for the listener just like a regular view (like above) but have the option for Kotlin code to use the function implementation:
interface Listener {
fun onEvent()
}
when I try to use setListener like above in my Kotlin test activity I get a compilation error saying that the function expects type Listener but got () -> Unit.
Is there a way to enable this kind of implementation in Kotlin without having to create a new function for this?
I thought about having just one function that receives () -> Unit but then it look weird in the Java code (Function1 etc.).
Thanks!
I am working on an android library that contains some views. Naturally these views can emit events.
I have an interface called (just for the purpose of this question) Listener. If I wrote the library in Java things would look like this:
public interface Listener {
void onEvent();
}
public class SomeView extends FrameLayout {
// Some more functions and implementation details
public void setListener(Listener l) { ... }
}
When using this view in a Kotlin activity I can use the setListener like this:
someViewInstance.setListener {
// implementation
}
I want to write my library in Kotlin, but it might be used in Java code as well, so I want to provide and interface for the listener just like a regular view (like above) but have the option for Kotlin code to use the function implementation:
interface Listener {
fun onEvent()
}
when I try to use setListener like above in my Kotlin test activity I get a compilation error saying that the function expects type Listener but got () -> Unit.
Is there a way to enable this kind of implementation in Kotlin without having to create a new function for this?
I thought about having just one function that receives () -> Unit but then it look weird in the Java code (Function1 etc.).
Thanks!
asked Mar 12 at 8:10
Dor MesicaDor Mesica
321316
321316
You might wanna check this link : kotlinlang.org/docs/reference/lambdas.html
– Jeel Vankhede
Mar 12 at 8:27
add a comment |
You might wanna check this link : kotlinlang.org/docs/reference/lambdas.html
– Jeel Vankhede
Mar 12 at 8:27
You might wanna check this link : kotlinlang.org/docs/reference/lambdas.html
– Jeel Vankhede
Mar 12 at 8:27
You might wanna check this link : kotlinlang.org/docs/reference/lambdas.html
– Jeel Vankhede
Mar 12 at 8:27
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
You can define your interface as suggested and also add an extension that allows the usage of a lambda which is more idimatic for Kotlin code.
class SomeView {
fun setListener(l: Listener) {}
}
fun SomeView.setListener(l: () -> Unit) = setListener(object : Listener {
override fun onEvent() = l()
})
In Java, you would still be able to pass the Listener implementation.
I tried to define the extension function in the same file as the class itself and then use it in the activity, but it didn't work. Only when I defined the extension in the activity did it work. I am working on a library so it is not an option to define the extension with the activity. Have I missed something?
– Dor Mesica
Mar 13 at 10:01
it's important that you don't define the extension inside a class body but on top-level
– s1m0nw1
Mar 13 at 10:08
It's not in the type body. I defined it right after the class definition. After the last}of the class
– Dor Mesica
Mar 13 at 10:10
what happens if you import it in your activity? tryimport packagename.extensionNamewith your extension namedextensionNameand defined in packagepackagename
– s1m0nw1
Mar 13 at 10:11
I works.. I forgot to import it. Thanks!
– Dor Mesica
Mar 13 at 10:12
add a comment |
This is called SAM-conversions,
Just like Java 8, Kotlin supports SAM conversions. This means that Kotlin function literals can be automatically converted into implementations of Java interfaces with a single non-default method, as long as the parameter types of the interface method match the parameter types of the Kotlin function.
But
Note that SAM conversions only work for interfaces, not for abstract classes, even if those also have just a single abstract method.
Also note that this feature works only for Java interop; since Kotlin has proper function types, automatic conversion of functions into implementations of Kotlin interfaces is unnecessary and therefore unsupported.
So, you can't write a simple Kotlin code to simulate this call.
In Java, if you write a
public interface Listener {
void onEvent(); // SAM: Single Abstract Method. Only 1 is allowed
}
And you have a
public class SomeView extends FrameLayout {
// skip the constructors
public void setListener(Listener listener) {
// do something
}
}
Then you can do such a fancy call in Kotlin, thanks to SAM-conversion:
SomeView(this).setListener {} // asking a parameter with type () -> Unit for setListener
// Then parenthesis of function call can be omitted
// setListener function can also accept a parameter with type Listener
// by object : Listener {}
But if you convert that Java file into Kotlin, the code will report an error, due to the reason mentioned above. You have to implement a SomeView.setListener(() -> Unit) function by yourself, for example
fun SomeView.setListener(l: () -> Unit) {
listener = object : Listener{
override fun onEvent() {
l()
}
}
}
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55116769%2finterface-as-functions-in-kotlin%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You can define your interface as suggested and also add an extension that allows the usage of a lambda which is more idimatic for Kotlin code.
class SomeView {
fun setListener(l: Listener) {}
}
fun SomeView.setListener(l: () -> Unit) = setListener(object : Listener {
override fun onEvent() = l()
})
In Java, you would still be able to pass the Listener implementation.
I tried to define the extension function in the same file as the class itself and then use it in the activity, but it didn't work. Only when I defined the extension in the activity did it work. I am working on a library so it is not an option to define the extension with the activity. Have I missed something?
– Dor Mesica
Mar 13 at 10:01
it's important that you don't define the extension inside a class body but on top-level
– s1m0nw1
Mar 13 at 10:08
It's not in the type body. I defined it right after the class definition. After the last}of the class
– Dor Mesica
Mar 13 at 10:10
what happens if you import it in your activity? tryimport packagename.extensionNamewith your extension namedextensionNameand defined in packagepackagename
– s1m0nw1
Mar 13 at 10:11
I works.. I forgot to import it. Thanks!
– Dor Mesica
Mar 13 at 10:12
add a comment |
You can define your interface as suggested and also add an extension that allows the usage of a lambda which is more idimatic for Kotlin code.
class SomeView {
fun setListener(l: Listener) {}
}
fun SomeView.setListener(l: () -> Unit) = setListener(object : Listener {
override fun onEvent() = l()
})
In Java, you would still be able to pass the Listener implementation.
I tried to define the extension function in the same file as the class itself and then use it in the activity, but it didn't work. Only when I defined the extension in the activity did it work. I am working on a library so it is not an option to define the extension with the activity. Have I missed something?
– Dor Mesica
Mar 13 at 10:01
it's important that you don't define the extension inside a class body but on top-level
– s1m0nw1
Mar 13 at 10:08
It's not in the type body. I defined it right after the class definition. After the last}of the class
– Dor Mesica
Mar 13 at 10:10
what happens if you import it in your activity? tryimport packagename.extensionNamewith your extension namedextensionNameand defined in packagepackagename
– s1m0nw1
Mar 13 at 10:11
I works.. I forgot to import it. Thanks!
– Dor Mesica
Mar 13 at 10:12
add a comment |
You can define your interface as suggested and also add an extension that allows the usage of a lambda which is more idimatic for Kotlin code.
class SomeView {
fun setListener(l: Listener) {}
}
fun SomeView.setListener(l: () -> Unit) = setListener(object : Listener {
override fun onEvent() = l()
})
In Java, you would still be able to pass the Listener implementation.
You can define your interface as suggested and also add an extension that allows the usage of a lambda which is more idimatic for Kotlin code.
class SomeView {
fun setListener(l: Listener) {}
}
fun SomeView.setListener(l: () -> Unit) = setListener(object : Listener {
override fun onEvent() = l()
})
In Java, you would still be able to pass the Listener implementation.
answered Mar 12 at 8:29
s1m0nw1s1m0nw1
30.3k656111
30.3k656111
I tried to define the extension function in the same file as the class itself and then use it in the activity, but it didn't work. Only when I defined the extension in the activity did it work. I am working on a library so it is not an option to define the extension with the activity. Have I missed something?
– Dor Mesica
Mar 13 at 10:01
it's important that you don't define the extension inside a class body but on top-level
– s1m0nw1
Mar 13 at 10:08
It's not in the type body. I defined it right after the class definition. After the last}of the class
– Dor Mesica
Mar 13 at 10:10
what happens if you import it in your activity? tryimport packagename.extensionNamewith your extension namedextensionNameand defined in packagepackagename
– s1m0nw1
Mar 13 at 10:11
I works.. I forgot to import it. Thanks!
– Dor Mesica
Mar 13 at 10:12
add a comment |
I tried to define the extension function in the same file as the class itself and then use it in the activity, but it didn't work. Only when I defined the extension in the activity did it work. I am working on a library so it is not an option to define the extension with the activity. Have I missed something?
– Dor Mesica
Mar 13 at 10:01
it's important that you don't define the extension inside a class body but on top-level
– s1m0nw1
Mar 13 at 10:08
It's not in the type body. I defined it right after the class definition. After the last}of the class
– Dor Mesica
Mar 13 at 10:10
what happens if you import it in your activity? tryimport packagename.extensionNamewith your extension namedextensionNameand defined in packagepackagename
– s1m0nw1
Mar 13 at 10:11
I works.. I forgot to import it. Thanks!
– Dor Mesica
Mar 13 at 10:12
I tried to define the extension function in the same file as the class itself and then use it in the activity, but it didn't work. Only when I defined the extension in the activity did it work. I am working on a library so it is not an option to define the extension with the activity. Have I missed something?
– Dor Mesica
Mar 13 at 10:01
I tried to define the extension function in the same file as the class itself and then use it in the activity, but it didn't work. Only when I defined the extension in the activity did it work. I am working on a library so it is not an option to define the extension with the activity. Have I missed something?
– Dor Mesica
Mar 13 at 10:01
it's important that you don't define the extension inside a class body but on top-level
– s1m0nw1
Mar 13 at 10:08
it's important that you don't define the extension inside a class body but on top-level
– s1m0nw1
Mar 13 at 10:08
It's not in the type body. I defined it right after the class definition. After the last
} of the class– Dor Mesica
Mar 13 at 10:10
It's not in the type body. I defined it right after the class definition. After the last
} of the class– Dor Mesica
Mar 13 at 10:10
what happens if you import it in your activity? try
import packagename.extensionName with your extension named extensionName and defined in package packagename– s1m0nw1
Mar 13 at 10:11
what happens if you import it in your activity? try
import packagename.extensionName with your extension named extensionName and defined in package packagename– s1m0nw1
Mar 13 at 10:11
I works.. I forgot to import it. Thanks!
– Dor Mesica
Mar 13 at 10:12
I works.. I forgot to import it. Thanks!
– Dor Mesica
Mar 13 at 10:12
add a comment |
This is called SAM-conversions,
Just like Java 8, Kotlin supports SAM conversions. This means that Kotlin function literals can be automatically converted into implementations of Java interfaces with a single non-default method, as long as the parameter types of the interface method match the parameter types of the Kotlin function.
But
Note that SAM conversions only work for interfaces, not for abstract classes, even if those also have just a single abstract method.
Also note that this feature works only for Java interop; since Kotlin has proper function types, automatic conversion of functions into implementations of Kotlin interfaces is unnecessary and therefore unsupported.
So, you can't write a simple Kotlin code to simulate this call.
In Java, if you write a
public interface Listener {
void onEvent(); // SAM: Single Abstract Method. Only 1 is allowed
}
And you have a
public class SomeView extends FrameLayout {
// skip the constructors
public void setListener(Listener listener) {
// do something
}
}
Then you can do such a fancy call in Kotlin, thanks to SAM-conversion:
SomeView(this).setListener {} // asking a parameter with type () -> Unit for setListener
// Then parenthesis of function call can be omitted
// setListener function can also accept a parameter with type Listener
// by object : Listener {}
But if you convert that Java file into Kotlin, the code will report an error, due to the reason mentioned above. You have to implement a SomeView.setListener(() -> Unit) function by yourself, for example
fun SomeView.setListener(l: () -> Unit) {
listener = object : Listener{
override fun onEvent() {
l()
}
}
}
add a comment |
This is called SAM-conversions,
Just like Java 8, Kotlin supports SAM conversions. This means that Kotlin function literals can be automatically converted into implementations of Java interfaces with a single non-default method, as long as the parameter types of the interface method match the parameter types of the Kotlin function.
But
Note that SAM conversions only work for interfaces, not for abstract classes, even if those also have just a single abstract method.
Also note that this feature works only for Java interop; since Kotlin has proper function types, automatic conversion of functions into implementations of Kotlin interfaces is unnecessary and therefore unsupported.
So, you can't write a simple Kotlin code to simulate this call.
In Java, if you write a
public interface Listener {
void onEvent(); // SAM: Single Abstract Method. Only 1 is allowed
}
And you have a
public class SomeView extends FrameLayout {
// skip the constructors
public void setListener(Listener listener) {
// do something
}
}
Then you can do such a fancy call in Kotlin, thanks to SAM-conversion:
SomeView(this).setListener {} // asking a parameter with type () -> Unit for setListener
// Then parenthesis of function call can be omitted
// setListener function can also accept a parameter with type Listener
// by object : Listener {}
But if you convert that Java file into Kotlin, the code will report an error, due to the reason mentioned above. You have to implement a SomeView.setListener(() -> Unit) function by yourself, for example
fun SomeView.setListener(l: () -> Unit) {
listener = object : Listener{
override fun onEvent() {
l()
}
}
}
add a comment |
This is called SAM-conversions,
Just like Java 8, Kotlin supports SAM conversions. This means that Kotlin function literals can be automatically converted into implementations of Java interfaces with a single non-default method, as long as the parameter types of the interface method match the parameter types of the Kotlin function.
But
Note that SAM conversions only work for interfaces, not for abstract classes, even if those also have just a single abstract method.
Also note that this feature works only for Java interop; since Kotlin has proper function types, automatic conversion of functions into implementations of Kotlin interfaces is unnecessary and therefore unsupported.
So, you can't write a simple Kotlin code to simulate this call.
In Java, if you write a
public interface Listener {
void onEvent(); // SAM: Single Abstract Method. Only 1 is allowed
}
And you have a
public class SomeView extends FrameLayout {
// skip the constructors
public void setListener(Listener listener) {
// do something
}
}
Then you can do such a fancy call in Kotlin, thanks to SAM-conversion:
SomeView(this).setListener {} // asking a parameter with type () -> Unit for setListener
// Then parenthesis of function call can be omitted
// setListener function can also accept a parameter with type Listener
// by object : Listener {}
But if you convert that Java file into Kotlin, the code will report an error, due to the reason mentioned above. You have to implement a SomeView.setListener(() -> Unit) function by yourself, for example
fun SomeView.setListener(l: () -> Unit) {
listener = object : Listener{
override fun onEvent() {
l()
}
}
}
This is called SAM-conversions,
Just like Java 8, Kotlin supports SAM conversions. This means that Kotlin function literals can be automatically converted into implementations of Java interfaces with a single non-default method, as long as the parameter types of the interface method match the parameter types of the Kotlin function.
But
Note that SAM conversions only work for interfaces, not for abstract classes, even if those also have just a single abstract method.
Also note that this feature works only for Java interop; since Kotlin has proper function types, automatic conversion of functions into implementations of Kotlin interfaces is unnecessary and therefore unsupported.
So, you can't write a simple Kotlin code to simulate this call.
In Java, if you write a
public interface Listener {
void onEvent(); // SAM: Single Abstract Method. Only 1 is allowed
}
And you have a
public class SomeView extends FrameLayout {
// skip the constructors
public void setListener(Listener listener) {
// do something
}
}
Then you can do such a fancy call in Kotlin, thanks to SAM-conversion:
SomeView(this).setListener {} // asking a parameter with type () -> Unit for setListener
// Then parenthesis of function call can be omitted
// setListener function can also accept a parameter with type Listener
// by object : Listener {}
But if you convert that Java file into Kotlin, the code will report an error, due to the reason mentioned above. You have to implement a SomeView.setListener(() -> Unit) function by yourself, for example
fun SomeView.setListener(l: () -> Unit) {
listener = object : Listener{
override fun onEvent() {
l()
}
}
}
edited Mar 12 at 8:52
answered Mar 12 at 8:40
Geno ChenGeno Chen
2,76561125
2,76561125
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55116769%2finterface-as-functions-in-kotlin%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
You might wanna check this link : kotlinlang.org/docs/reference/lambdas.html
– Jeel Vankhede
Mar 12 at 8:27