$p$-adic values of rational points on elliptic curves
$begingroup$
The following question came up naturally whilst studying diophantine equations: given an elliptic curve $E$ of the form $Y^2 + aY = X^3 +bX^2 + cX + d$ defined over $mathbb{Q}$, consider the subset $C subseteq mathbb{Q}$ of numbers which appear as either the first or the second coordinate of a rational point on $E$.
If we assume that $E$ has infinitely many points then $C$ is infinite. I would like to understand how 'large' $C$ can get, in particular: can we choose $E$ such that $C$ has unbounded $p$-adic value for all prime numbers $p$? Maybe we can at least choose $E$ such that $C$ has unbounded $p$-adic value for all primes in a given finite set of prime numbers? I know almost nothing about the topic, so any pointers you might have to articles or books studying the set $C$ would be very helpful.
number-theory elliptic-curves algebraic-curves
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The following question came up naturally whilst studying diophantine equations: given an elliptic curve $E$ of the form $Y^2 + aY = X^3 +bX^2 + cX + d$ defined over $mathbb{Q}$, consider the subset $C subseteq mathbb{Q}$ of numbers which appear as either the first or the second coordinate of a rational point on $E$.
If we assume that $E$ has infinitely many points then $C$ is infinite. I would like to understand how 'large' $C$ can get, in particular: can we choose $E$ such that $C$ has unbounded $p$-adic value for all prime numbers $p$? Maybe we can at least choose $E$ such that $C$ has unbounded $p$-adic value for all primes in a given finite set of prime numbers? I know almost nothing about the topic, so any pointers you might have to articles or books studying the set $C$ would be very helpful.
number-theory elliptic-curves algebraic-curves
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The following question came up naturally whilst studying diophantine equations: given an elliptic curve $E$ of the form $Y^2 + aY = X^3 +bX^2 + cX + d$ defined over $mathbb{Q}$, consider the subset $C subseteq mathbb{Q}$ of numbers which appear as either the first or the second coordinate of a rational point on $E$.
If we assume that $E$ has infinitely many points then $C$ is infinite. I would like to understand how 'large' $C$ can get, in particular: can we choose $E$ such that $C$ has unbounded $p$-adic value for all prime numbers $p$? Maybe we can at least choose $E$ such that $C$ has unbounded $p$-adic value for all primes in a given finite set of prime numbers? I know almost nothing about the topic, so any pointers you might have to articles or books studying the set $C$ would be very helpful.
number-theory elliptic-curves algebraic-curves
$endgroup$
The following question came up naturally whilst studying diophantine equations: given an elliptic curve $E$ of the form $Y^2 + aY = X^3 +bX^2 + cX + d$ defined over $mathbb{Q}$, consider the subset $C subseteq mathbb{Q}$ of numbers which appear as either the first or the second coordinate of a rational point on $E$.
If we assume that $E$ has infinitely many points then $C$ is infinite. I would like to understand how 'large' $C$ can get, in particular: can we choose $E$ such that $C$ has unbounded $p$-adic value for all prime numbers $p$? Maybe we can at least choose $E$ such that $C$ has unbounded $p$-adic value for all primes in a given finite set of prime numbers? I know almost nothing about the topic, so any pointers you might have to articles or books studying the set $C$ would be very helpful.
number-theory elliptic-curves algebraic-curves
number-theory elliptic-curves algebraic-curves
asked Dec 20 '18 at 15:18
Bib-lostBib-lost
2,040629
2,040629
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I'm not sure when you say unbounded $p$-adic value (absolute value?) you mean above or below?
Here is something that might interest you at least. Whenever $E(mathbf Q)$ is infinite the set $C$ will always contain rationals with arbitrarily large $p$-adic absolute value, so denominator highly divisible by $p$. In fact these all come from the $x$ coordinate alone.
The trick here is the $p$-adic filtration on $E$, we may define for any $p$
$$ E_n = {P in E(mathbf Q_p) : v_p(x(P)) le -2n } $$
then this is a descending sequence of subgroups of $E(mathbf Q_p)$ which we think of as the subgroups of $p$-adic points which are $p$-adically close to the point at infinity. For this sequence the magic is that we have
$$E(mathbf Q_p)/E_1 cong E(mathbf F_p)$$
and
$$E_n/E_{n+1} cong mathbf F_p$$
as groups. For detail you can look at Husemoller's book chapter 14. The point is if $P in E(mathbf Q)$ is of infinite order then $(#E(mathbf F_p)) cdot P in E_1$ and moreover $p^n cdot (#E(mathbf F_p)) cdot P in E_n$ so we have a point with large negative $p$-adic valuation.
And here is some Sage code demonstrating this because I like Sage code:
sage: E = EllipticCurve("37a1")
sage: E.rank()
1
sage: P = E.gens()[0]
sage: P
(0 : -1 : 1)
sage: P.order()
+Infinity
sage: E.ap(5)
-2
sage: 6 - E.ap(5) # this is the number of points over F_5
8
sage: 8*P
(21/25 : -56/125 : 1)
sage: 5*8*P
(263817293110494867593838666854208001/292736325329248127651484680640160000 : -34188880637325550305106055730237610829874076311530751/158385319626308443937475969221994173751192384064000000 : 1)
sage: (5*8*P)[0]
263817293110494867593838666854208001/292736325329248127651484680640160000
sage: ((5*8*P)[0]).valuation(5)
-4
sage: ((5^2*8*P)[0]).valuation(5)
-6
sage: ((5^3*8*P)[0]).valuation(5)
-8
sage: ((5^4*8*P)[0]).valuation(5)
-10
You should probably be a little careful with the definition of the filtration if $E$ has bad reduction at $p$ but it should still work (I can show an example of this if you like).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Hey Alex, I was writing up my answer and then I saw you posted this, which has roughly the same content but I decided to post it anyway :)
$endgroup$
– Jef L
Dec 22 '18 at 21:58
$begingroup$
@JefL hey, whats up man! No problem, yours is more detailed/correct anyway ;), guess I was too hasty!
$endgroup$
– Alex J Best
Dec 22 '18 at 22:01
$begingroup$
Thanks, I'll need some time to work through your answer. Indeed I was initially looking for curves with $p$-adic value not bounded from above, but having unbounded from below might also work.
$endgroup$
– Bib-lost
Dec 23 '18 at 13:06
$begingroup$
Husemoller (Theorem 5.4.5) seems to discuss the more general setup of a valued field, without using completions and without assumptions on good/bad reduction. The results are slightly weaker, but sufficient for you argument to go through.
$endgroup$
– Bib-lost
Dec 24 '18 at 12:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I believe most of your questions can be answered using the material from Silverman's 'The Arithmetic of Elliptic curves'. The relevant section for your questions on the $p$-adic valuation of the rational solutions would be the section on elliptic curves over local fields.
Here are some highlights of the theory: if $E$ is an elliptic curve over $mathbb{Q}_p$ (or any finite extension of such field, but if you're only interested in $mathbb{Q}$ these suffice) defined by a Weierstrass equation, there is a filtration of subgroups of $E(mathbb{Q}_p)$:
$$E(mathbb{Q}_p)supset E_0(mathbb{Q}_p) supset E_1(mathbb{Q}_p) supset E_2(mathbb{Q}_p) supset cdots$$
with the following properties:
- each of the successive quotients is finite: more precisely $E_r(mathbb{Q}_p)/E_{r+1}(mathbb{Q}_p) simeq (mathbb{F}_p,+)$ if $rgeq 1$, $E_0(mathbb{Q}_p)/E_1(mathbb{Q}_p) simeq tilde{E}_{ns}(mathbb{F}_p)$ where $tilde{E}_{ns}$ are the nonsingular points on the curve $E$ 'reduced modulo p' (i.e. by looking at the Weierstrass equation modulo $p$) and $E(mathbb{Q}_p)/E_0(mathbb{Q}_p)$ is trivial when $E$ has good reduction (i.e. when $E$ modulo $p$ has no singular points) but can be a nontrivial (finite) group when $E$ has bad reduction.
- if $pgeq 3$ then there's an isomorphism $E_1(mathbb{Q}_p) simeq (mathbb{Z}_p,+)$ of topological groups. If $p = 2$ then likewise $E_2(mathbb{Q}_2) simeq (mathbb{Z}_2,+)$.
- For $rgeq 1$ we can explicitly describe $E_r(mathbb{Q}_p)$ as $$E_r(mathbb{Q}_p) = left{(x,y) in E(mathbb{Q}_p) mid v(x) leq -2r , v(y) leq -3r right} cup {O_E} $$
(where $O_E$ is the identity of $E$ i.e. the unique point at infinity)
and $$E(mathbb{Q}_p) setminus E_1(mathbb{Q}_p) = {(x,y) in Emid v(x),v(y)geq 0 }$$
Now for your questions: if $P in E(mathbb{Q}_p)$ is of infinite order and $rgeq 1$ then $n.[E(mathbb{Q}_p):E_r(mathbb{Q}_p)].P$ is in $E_r(mathbb{Q}_p)$ for $ngeq 1$ and it doesn't equal $O_E$. It follows that for every prime $p$ we have that in your notation $S _p ={v_p(x) mid xin C}$ is never bounded below if the rank of $E$ is positive.
It seems that the set $S_p$ should be bounded above but I don't see an immediate argument why this is the case. Hope this helps.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
If $E(mathbf{Q})$ has positive rank, the closure of $E(mathbf{Q})$ is a finite index (and computable) subgroup of $E(mathbf{Q}_p)$. There are elements with large positive valuation if and only the closure contains any of the points with $X = 0$ or $Y = 0$. A necessary condition is that at least one such point actually lies in $E(mathbf{Q}_p)$, but this is not sufficient. On the other hand, it certainly can happen.
$endgroup$
– Lorem Ipsum
Dec 22 '18 at 23:42
$begingroup$
Thanks, I'll need some time to work through your answer.
$endgroup$
– Bib-lost
Dec 23 '18 at 13:06
$begingroup$
@LoremIpsum: thanks for the comment! Is there a good place to look up these claims with their proofs?
$endgroup$
– Jef L
Dec 23 '18 at 13:31
$begingroup$
But your answer pretty much already explains it! $E_1(mathbf{Q}_p)$ is a finite index subgroup of $E(mathbf{Q}_p)$, and yet is (topologically) isomorphic to $ mathbf{Z}_p$. But any non-trivial closed subgroup of $mathbf{Z}_p$ has finite index.
$endgroup$
– Lorem Ipsum
Dec 23 '18 at 14:20
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3047646%2fp-adic-values-of-rational-points-on-elliptic-curves%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I'm not sure when you say unbounded $p$-adic value (absolute value?) you mean above or below?
Here is something that might interest you at least. Whenever $E(mathbf Q)$ is infinite the set $C$ will always contain rationals with arbitrarily large $p$-adic absolute value, so denominator highly divisible by $p$. In fact these all come from the $x$ coordinate alone.
The trick here is the $p$-adic filtration on $E$, we may define for any $p$
$$ E_n = {P in E(mathbf Q_p) : v_p(x(P)) le -2n } $$
then this is a descending sequence of subgroups of $E(mathbf Q_p)$ which we think of as the subgroups of $p$-adic points which are $p$-adically close to the point at infinity. For this sequence the magic is that we have
$$E(mathbf Q_p)/E_1 cong E(mathbf F_p)$$
and
$$E_n/E_{n+1} cong mathbf F_p$$
as groups. For detail you can look at Husemoller's book chapter 14. The point is if $P in E(mathbf Q)$ is of infinite order then $(#E(mathbf F_p)) cdot P in E_1$ and moreover $p^n cdot (#E(mathbf F_p)) cdot P in E_n$ so we have a point with large negative $p$-adic valuation.
And here is some Sage code demonstrating this because I like Sage code:
sage: E = EllipticCurve("37a1")
sage: E.rank()
1
sage: P = E.gens()[0]
sage: P
(0 : -1 : 1)
sage: P.order()
+Infinity
sage: E.ap(5)
-2
sage: 6 - E.ap(5) # this is the number of points over F_5
8
sage: 8*P
(21/25 : -56/125 : 1)
sage: 5*8*P
(263817293110494867593838666854208001/292736325329248127651484680640160000 : -34188880637325550305106055730237610829874076311530751/158385319626308443937475969221994173751192384064000000 : 1)
sage: (5*8*P)[0]
263817293110494867593838666854208001/292736325329248127651484680640160000
sage: ((5*8*P)[0]).valuation(5)
-4
sage: ((5^2*8*P)[0]).valuation(5)
-6
sage: ((5^3*8*P)[0]).valuation(5)
-8
sage: ((5^4*8*P)[0]).valuation(5)
-10
You should probably be a little careful with the definition of the filtration if $E$ has bad reduction at $p$ but it should still work (I can show an example of this if you like).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Hey Alex, I was writing up my answer and then I saw you posted this, which has roughly the same content but I decided to post it anyway :)
$endgroup$
– Jef L
Dec 22 '18 at 21:58
$begingroup$
@JefL hey, whats up man! No problem, yours is more detailed/correct anyway ;), guess I was too hasty!
$endgroup$
– Alex J Best
Dec 22 '18 at 22:01
$begingroup$
Thanks, I'll need some time to work through your answer. Indeed I was initially looking for curves with $p$-adic value not bounded from above, but having unbounded from below might also work.
$endgroup$
– Bib-lost
Dec 23 '18 at 13:06
$begingroup$
Husemoller (Theorem 5.4.5) seems to discuss the more general setup of a valued field, without using completions and without assumptions on good/bad reduction. The results are slightly weaker, but sufficient for you argument to go through.
$endgroup$
– Bib-lost
Dec 24 '18 at 12:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm not sure when you say unbounded $p$-adic value (absolute value?) you mean above or below?
Here is something that might interest you at least. Whenever $E(mathbf Q)$ is infinite the set $C$ will always contain rationals with arbitrarily large $p$-adic absolute value, so denominator highly divisible by $p$. In fact these all come from the $x$ coordinate alone.
The trick here is the $p$-adic filtration on $E$, we may define for any $p$
$$ E_n = {P in E(mathbf Q_p) : v_p(x(P)) le -2n } $$
then this is a descending sequence of subgroups of $E(mathbf Q_p)$ which we think of as the subgroups of $p$-adic points which are $p$-adically close to the point at infinity. For this sequence the magic is that we have
$$E(mathbf Q_p)/E_1 cong E(mathbf F_p)$$
and
$$E_n/E_{n+1} cong mathbf F_p$$
as groups. For detail you can look at Husemoller's book chapter 14. The point is if $P in E(mathbf Q)$ is of infinite order then $(#E(mathbf F_p)) cdot P in E_1$ and moreover $p^n cdot (#E(mathbf F_p)) cdot P in E_n$ so we have a point with large negative $p$-adic valuation.
And here is some Sage code demonstrating this because I like Sage code:
sage: E = EllipticCurve("37a1")
sage: E.rank()
1
sage: P = E.gens()[0]
sage: P
(0 : -1 : 1)
sage: P.order()
+Infinity
sage: E.ap(5)
-2
sage: 6 - E.ap(5) # this is the number of points over F_5
8
sage: 8*P
(21/25 : -56/125 : 1)
sage: 5*8*P
(263817293110494867593838666854208001/292736325329248127651484680640160000 : -34188880637325550305106055730237610829874076311530751/158385319626308443937475969221994173751192384064000000 : 1)
sage: (5*8*P)[0]
263817293110494867593838666854208001/292736325329248127651484680640160000
sage: ((5*8*P)[0]).valuation(5)
-4
sage: ((5^2*8*P)[0]).valuation(5)
-6
sage: ((5^3*8*P)[0]).valuation(5)
-8
sage: ((5^4*8*P)[0]).valuation(5)
-10
You should probably be a little careful with the definition of the filtration if $E$ has bad reduction at $p$ but it should still work (I can show an example of this if you like).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Hey Alex, I was writing up my answer and then I saw you posted this, which has roughly the same content but I decided to post it anyway :)
$endgroup$
– Jef L
Dec 22 '18 at 21:58
$begingroup$
@JefL hey, whats up man! No problem, yours is more detailed/correct anyway ;), guess I was too hasty!
$endgroup$
– Alex J Best
Dec 22 '18 at 22:01
$begingroup$
Thanks, I'll need some time to work through your answer. Indeed I was initially looking for curves with $p$-adic value not bounded from above, but having unbounded from below might also work.
$endgroup$
– Bib-lost
Dec 23 '18 at 13:06
$begingroup$
Husemoller (Theorem 5.4.5) seems to discuss the more general setup of a valued field, without using completions and without assumptions on good/bad reduction. The results are slightly weaker, but sufficient for you argument to go through.
$endgroup$
– Bib-lost
Dec 24 '18 at 12:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm not sure when you say unbounded $p$-adic value (absolute value?) you mean above or below?
Here is something that might interest you at least. Whenever $E(mathbf Q)$ is infinite the set $C$ will always contain rationals with arbitrarily large $p$-adic absolute value, so denominator highly divisible by $p$. In fact these all come from the $x$ coordinate alone.
The trick here is the $p$-adic filtration on $E$, we may define for any $p$
$$ E_n = {P in E(mathbf Q_p) : v_p(x(P)) le -2n } $$
then this is a descending sequence of subgroups of $E(mathbf Q_p)$ which we think of as the subgroups of $p$-adic points which are $p$-adically close to the point at infinity. For this sequence the magic is that we have
$$E(mathbf Q_p)/E_1 cong E(mathbf F_p)$$
and
$$E_n/E_{n+1} cong mathbf F_p$$
as groups. For detail you can look at Husemoller's book chapter 14. The point is if $P in E(mathbf Q)$ is of infinite order then $(#E(mathbf F_p)) cdot P in E_1$ and moreover $p^n cdot (#E(mathbf F_p)) cdot P in E_n$ so we have a point with large negative $p$-adic valuation.
And here is some Sage code demonstrating this because I like Sage code:
sage: E = EllipticCurve("37a1")
sage: E.rank()
1
sage: P = E.gens()[0]
sage: P
(0 : -1 : 1)
sage: P.order()
+Infinity
sage: E.ap(5)
-2
sage: 6 - E.ap(5) # this is the number of points over F_5
8
sage: 8*P
(21/25 : -56/125 : 1)
sage: 5*8*P
(263817293110494867593838666854208001/292736325329248127651484680640160000 : -34188880637325550305106055730237610829874076311530751/158385319626308443937475969221994173751192384064000000 : 1)
sage: (5*8*P)[0]
263817293110494867593838666854208001/292736325329248127651484680640160000
sage: ((5*8*P)[0]).valuation(5)
-4
sage: ((5^2*8*P)[0]).valuation(5)
-6
sage: ((5^3*8*P)[0]).valuation(5)
-8
sage: ((5^4*8*P)[0]).valuation(5)
-10
You should probably be a little careful with the definition of the filtration if $E$ has bad reduction at $p$ but it should still work (I can show an example of this if you like).
$endgroup$
I'm not sure when you say unbounded $p$-adic value (absolute value?) you mean above or below?
Here is something that might interest you at least. Whenever $E(mathbf Q)$ is infinite the set $C$ will always contain rationals with arbitrarily large $p$-adic absolute value, so denominator highly divisible by $p$. In fact these all come from the $x$ coordinate alone.
The trick here is the $p$-adic filtration on $E$, we may define for any $p$
$$ E_n = {P in E(mathbf Q_p) : v_p(x(P)) le -2n } $$
then this is a descending sequence of subgroups of $E(mathbf Q_p)$ which we think of as the subgroups of $p$-adic points which are $p$-adically close to the point at infinity. For this sequence the magic is that we have
$$E(mathbf Q_p)/E_1 cong E(mathbf F_p)$$
and
$$E_n/E_{n+1} cong mathbf F_p$$
as groups. For detail you can look at Husemoller's book chapter 14. The point is if $P in E(mathbf Q)$ is of infinite order then $(#E(mathbf F_p)) cdot P in E_1$ and moreover $p^n cdot (#E(mathbf F_p)) cdot P in E_n$ so we have a point with large negative $p$-adic valuation.
And here is some Sage code demonstrating this because I like Sage code:
sage: E = EllipticCurve("37a1")
sage: E.rank()
1
sage: P = E.gens()[0]
sage: P
(0 : -1 : 1)
sage: P.order()
+Infinity
sage: E.ap(5)
-2
sage: 6 - E.ap(5) # this is the number of points over F_5
8
sage: 8*P
(21/25 : -56/125 : 1)
sage: 5*8*P
(263817293110494867593838666854208001/292736325329248127651484680640160000 : -34188880637325550305106055730237610829874076311530751/158385319626308443937475969221994173751192384064000000 : 1)
sage: (5*8*P)[0]
263817293110494867593838666854208001/292736325329248127651484680640160000
sage: ((5*8*P)[0]).valuation(5)
-4
sage: ((5^2*8*P)[0]).valuation(5)
-6
sage: ((5^3*8*P)[0]).valuation(5)
-8
sage: ((5^4*8*P)[0]).valuation(5)
-10
You should probably be a little careful with the definition of the filtration if $E$ has bad reduction at $p$ but it should still work (I can show an example of this if you like).
answered Dec 22 '18 at 18:52
Alex J BestAlex J Best
2,24111226
2,24111226
$begingroup$
Hey Alex, I was writing up my answer and then I saw you posted this, which has roughly the same content but I decided to post it anyway :)
$endgroup$
– Jef L
Dec 22 '18 at 21:58
$begingroup$
@JefL hey, whats up man! No problem, yours is more detailed/correct anyway ;), guess I was too hasty!
$endgroup$
– Alex J Best
Dec 22 '18 at 22:01
$begingroup$
Thanks, I'll need some time to work through your answer. Indeed I was initially looking for curves with $p$-adic value not bounded from above, but having unbounded from below might also work.
$endgroup$
– Bib-lost
Dec 23 '18 at 13:06
$begingroup$
Husemoller (Theorem 5.4.5) seems to discuss the more general setup of a valued field, without using completions and without assumptions on good/bad reduction. The results are slightly weaker, but sufficient for you argument to go through.
$endgroup$
– Bib-lost
Dec 24 '18 at 12:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hey Alex, I was writing up my answer and then I saw you posted this, which has roughly the same content but I decided to post it anyway :)
$endgroup$
– Jef L
Dec 22 '18 at 21:58
$begingroup$
@JefL hey, whats up man! No problem, yours is more detailed/correct anyway ;), guess I was too hasty!
$endgroup$
– Alex J Best
Dec 22 '18 at 22:01
$begingroup$
Thanks, I'll need some time to work through your answer. Indeed I was initially looking for curves with $p$-adic value not bounded from above, but having unbounded from below might also work.
$endgroup$
– Bib-lost
Dec 23 '18 at 13:06
$begingroup$
Husemoller (Theorem 5.4.5) seems to discuss the more general setup of a valued field, without using completions and without assumptions on good/bad reduction. The results are slightly weaker, but sufficient for you argument to go through.
$endgroup$
– Bib-lost
Dec 24 '18 at 12:57
$begingroup$
Hey Alex, I was writing up my answer and then I saw you posted this, which has roughly the same content but I decided to post it anyway :)
$endgroup$
– Jef L
Dec 22 '18 at 21:58
$begingroup$
Hey Alex, I was writing up my answer and then I saw you posted this, which has roughly the same content but I decided to post it anyway :)
$endgroup$
– Jef L
Dec 22 '18 at 21:58
$begingroup$
@JefL hey, whats up man! No problem, yours is more detailed/correct anyway ;), guess I was too hasty!
$endgroup$
– Alex J Best
Dec 22 '18 at 22:01
$begingroup$
@JefL hey, whats up man! No problem, yours is more detailed/correct anyway ;), guess I was too hasty!
$endgroup$
– Alex J Best
Dec 22 '18 at 22:01
$begingroup$
Thanks, I'll need some time to work through your answer. Indeed I was initially looking for curves with $p$-adic value not bounded from above, but having unbounded from below might also work.
$endgroup$
– Bib-lost
Dec 23 '18 at 13:06
$begingroup$
Thanks, I'll need some time to work through your answer. Indeed I was initially looking for curves with $p$-adic value not bounded from above, but having unbounded from below might also work.
$endgroup$
– Bib-lost
Dec 23 '18 at 13:06
$begingroup$
Husemoller (Theorem 5.4.5) seems to discuss the more general setup of a valued field, without using completions and without assumptions on good/bad reduction. The results are slightly weaker, but sufficient for you argument to go through.
$endgroup$
– Bib-lost
Dec 24 '18 at 12:57
$begingroup$
Husemoller (Theorem 5.4.5) seems to discuss the more general setup of a valued field, without using completions and without assumptions on good/bad reduction. The results are slightly weaker, but sufficient for you argument to go through.
$endgroup$
– Bib-lost
Dec 24 '18 at 12:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I believe most of your questions can be answered using the material from Silverman's 'The Arithmetic of Elliptic curves'. The relevant section for your questions on the $p$-adic valuation of the rational solutions would be the section on elliptic curves over local fields.
Here are some highlights of the theory: if $E$ is an elliptic curve over $mathbb{Q}_p$ (or any finite extension of such field, but if you're only interested in $mathbb{Q}$ these suffice) defined by a Weierstrass equation, there is a filtration of subgroups of $E(mathbb{Q}_p)$:
$$E(mathbb{Q}_p)supset E_0(mathbb{Q}_p) supset E_1(mathbb{Q}_p) supset E_2(mathbb{Q}_p) supset cdots$$
with the following properties:
- each of the successive quotients is finite: more precisely $E_r(mathbb{Q}_p)/E_{r+1}(mathbb{Q}_p) simeq (mathbb{F}_p,+)$ if $rgeq 1$, $E_0(mathbb{Q}_p)/E_1(mathbb{Q}_p) simeq tilde{E}_{ns}(mathbb{F}_p)$ where $tilde{E}_{ns}$ are the nonsingular points on the curve $E$ 'reduced modulo p' (i.e. by looking at the Weierstrass equation modulo $p$) and $E(mathbb{Q}_p)/E_0(mathbb{Q}_p)$ is trivial when $E$ has good reduction (i.e. when $E$ modulo $p$ has no singular points) but can be a nontrivial (finite) group when $E$ has bad reduction.
- if $pgeq 3$ then there's an isomorphism $E_1(mathbb{Q}_p) simeq (mathbb{Z}_p,+)$ of topological groups. If $p = 2$ then likewise $E_2(mathbb{Q}_2) simeq (mathbb{Z}_2,+)$.
- For $rgeq 1$ we can explicitly describe $E_r(mathbb{Q}_p)$ as $$E_r(mathbb{Q}_p) = left{(x,y) in E(mathbb{Q}_p) mid v(x) leq -2r , v(y) leq -3r right} cup {O_E} $$
(where $O_E$ is the identity of $E$ i.e. the unique point at infinity)
and $$E(mathbb{Q}_p) setminus E_1(mathbb{Q}_p) = {(x,y) in Emid v(x),v(y)geq 0 }$$
Now for your questions: if $P in E(mathbb{Q}_p)$ is of infinite order and $rgeq 1$ then $n.[E(mathbb{Q}_p):E_r(mathbb{Q}_p)].P$ is in $E_r(mathbb{Q}_p)$ for $ngeq 1$ and it doesn't equal $O_E$. It follows that for every prime $p$ we have that in your notation $S _p ={v_p(x) mid xin C}$ is never bounded below if the rank of $E$ is positive.
It seems that the set $S_p$ should be bounded above but I don't see an immediate argument why this is the case. Hope this helps.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
If $E(mathbf{Q})$ has positive rank, the closure of $E(mathbf{Q})$ is a finite index (and computable) subgroup of $E(mathbf{Q}_p)$. There are elements with large positive valuation if and only the closure contains any of the points with $X = 0$ or $Y = 0$. A necessary condition is that at least one such point actually lies in $E(mathbf{Q}_p)$, but this is not sufficient. On the other hand, it certainly can happen.
$endgroup$
– Lorem Ipsum
Dec 22 '18 at 23:42
$begingroup$
Thanks, I'll need some time to work through your answer.
$endgroup$
– Bib-lost
Dec 23 '18 at 13:06
$begingroup$
@LoremIpsum: thanks for the comment! Is there a good place to look up these claims with their proofs?
$endgroup$
– Jef L
Dec 23 '18 at 13:31
$begingroup$
But your answer pretty much already explains it! $E_1(mathbf{Q}_p)$ is a finite index subgroup of $E(mathbf{Q}_p)$, and yet is (topologically) isomorphic to $ mathbf{Z}_p$. But any non-trivial closed subgroup of $mathbf{Z}_p$ has finite index.
$endgroup$
– Lorem Ipsum
Dec 23 '18 at 14:20
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I believe most of your questions can be answered using the material from Silverman's 'The Arithmetic of Elliptic curves'. The relevant section for your questions on the $p$-adic valuation of the rational solutions would be the section on elliptic curves over local fields.
Here are some highlights of the theory: if $E$ is an elliptic curve over $mathbb{Q}_p$ (or any finite extension of such field, but if you're only interested in $mathbb{Q}$ these suffice) defined by a Weierstrass equation, there is a filtration of subgroups of $E(mathbb{Q}_p)$:
$$E(mathbb{Q}_p)supset E_0(mathbb{Q}_p) supset E_1(mathbb{Q}_p) supset E_2(mathbb{Q}_p) supset cdots$$
with the following properties:
- each of the successive quotients is finite: more precisely $E_r(mathbb{Q}_p)/E_{r+1}(mathbb{Q}_p) simeq (mathbb{F}_p,+)$ if $rgeq 1$, $E_0(mathbb{Q}_p)/E_1(mathbb{Q}_p) simeq tilde{E}_{ns}(mathbb{F}_p)$ where $tilde{E}_{ns}$ are the nonsingular points on the curve $E$ 'reduced modulo p' (i.e. by looking at the Weierstrass equation modulo $p$) and $E(mathbb{Q}_p)/E_0(mathbb{Q}_p)$ is trivial when $E$ has good reduction (i.e. when $E$ modulo $p$ has no singular points) but can be a nontrivial (finite) group when $E$ has bad reduction.
- if $pgeq 3$ then there's an isomorphism $E_1(mathbb{Q}_p) simeq (mathbb{Z}_p,+)$ of topological groups. If $p = 2$ then likewise $E_2(mathbb{Q}_2) simeq (mathbb{Z}_2,+)$.
- For $rgeq 1$ we can explicitly describe $E_r(mathbb{Q}_p)$ as $$E_r(mathbb{Q}_p) = left{(x,y) in E(mathbb{Q}_p) mid v(x) leq -2r , v(y) leq -3r right} cup {O_E} $$
(where $O_E$ is the identity of $E$ i.e. the unique point at infinity)
and $$E(mathbb{Q}_p) setminus E_1(mathbb{Q}_p) = {(x,y) in Emid v(x),v(y)geq 0 }$$
Now for your questions: if $P in E(mathbb{Q}_p)$ is of infinite order and $rgeq 1$ then $n.[E(mathbb{Q}_p):E_r(mathbb{Q}_p)].P$ is in $E_r(mathbb{Q}_p)$ for $ngeq 1$ and it doesn't equal $O_E$. It follows that for every prime $p$ we have that in your notation $S _p ={v_p(x) mid xin C}$ is never bounded below if the rank of $E$ is positive.
It seems that the set $S_p$ should be bounded above but I don't see an immediate argument why this is the case. Hope this helps.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
If $E(mathbf{Q})$ has positive rank, the closure of $E(mathbf{Q})$ is a finite index (and computable) subgroup of $E(mathbf{Q}_p)$. There are elements with large positive valuation if and only the closure contains any of the points with $X = 0$ or $Y = 0$. A necessary condition is that at least one such point actually lies in $E(mathbf{Q}_p)$, but this is not sufficient. On the other hand, it certainly can happen.
$endgroup$
– Lorem Ipsum
Dec 22 '18 at 23:42
$begingroup$
Thanks, I'll need some time to work through your answer.
$endgroup$
– Bib-lost
Dec 23 '18 at 13:06
$begingroup$
@LoremIpsum: thanks for the comment! Is there a good place to look up these claims with their proofs?
$endgroup$
– Jef L
Dec 23 '18 at 13:31
$begingroup$
But your answer pretty much already explains it! $E_1(mathbf{Q}_p)$ is a finite index subgroup of $E(mathbf{Q}_p)$, and yet is (topologically) isomorphic to $ mathbf{Z}_p$. But any non-trivial closed subgroup of $mathbf{Z}_p$ has finite index.
$endgroup$
– Lorem Ipsum
Dec 23 '18 at 14:20
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I believe most of your questions can be answered using the material from Silverman's 'The Arithmetic of Elliptic curves'. The relevant section for your questions on the $p$-adic valuation of the rational solutions would be the section on elliptic curves over local fields.
Here are some highlights of the theory: if $E$ is an elliptic curve over $mathbb{Q}_p$ (or any finite extension of such field, but if you're only interested in $mathbb{Q}$ these suffice) defined by a Weierstrass equation, there is a filtration of subgroups of $E(mathbb{Q}_p)$:
$$E(mathbb{Q}_p)supset E_0(mathbb{Q}_p) supset E_1(mathbb{Q}_p) supset E_2(mathbb{Q}_p) supset cdots$$
with the following properties:
- each of the successive quotients is finite: more precisely $E_r(mathbb{Q}_p)/E_{r+1}(mathbb{Q}_p) simeq (mathbb{F}_p,+)$ if $rgeq 1$, $E_0(mathbb{Q}_p)/E_1(mathbb{Q}_p) simeq tilde{E}_{ns}(mathbb{F}_p)$ where $tilde{E}_{ns}$ are the nonsingular points on the curve $E$ 'reduced modulo p' (i.e. by looking at the Weierstrass equation modulo $p$) and $E(mathbb{Q}_p)/E_0(mathbb{Q}_p)$ is trivial when $E$ has good reduction (i.e. when $E$ modulo $p$ has no singular points) but can be a nontrivial (finite) group when $E$ has bad reduction.
- if $pgeq 3$ then there's an isomorphism $E_1(mathbb{Q}_p) simeq (mathbb{Z}_p,+)$ of topological groups. If $p = 2$ then likewise $E_2(mathbb{Q}_2) simeq (mathbb{Z}_2,+)$.
- For $rgeq 1$ we can explicitly describe $E_r(mathbb{Q}_p)$ as $$E_r(mathbb{Q}_p) = left{(x,y) in E(mathbb{Q}_p) mid v(x) leq -2r , v(y) leq -3r right} cup {O_E} $$
(where $O_E$ is the identity of $E$ i.e. the unique point at infinity)
and $$E(mathbb{Q}_p) setminus E_1(mathbb{Q}_p) = {(x,y) in Emid v(x),v(y)geq 0 }$$
Now for your questions: if $P in E(mathbb{Q}_p)$ is of infinite order and $rgeq 1$ then $n.[E(mathbb{Q}_p):E_r(mathbb{Q}_p)].P$ is in $E_r(mathbb{Q}_p)$ for $ngeq 1$ and it doesn't equal $O_E$. It follows that for every prime $p$ we have that in your notation $S _p ={v_p(x) mid xin C}$ is never bounded below if the rank of $E$ is positive.
It seems that the set $S_p$ should be bounded above but I don't see an immediate argument why this is the case. Hope this helps.
$endgroup$
I believe most of your questions can be answered using the material from Silverman's 'The Arithmetic of Elliptic curves'. The relevant section for your questions on the $p$-adic valuation of the rational solutions would be the section on elliptic curves over local fields.
Here are some highlights of the theory: if $E$ is an elliptic curve over $mathbb{Q}_p$ (or any finite extension of such field, but if you're only interested in $mathbb{Q}$ these suffice) defined by a Weierstrass equation, there is a filtration of subgroups of $E(mathbb{Q}_p)$:
$$E(mathbb{Q}_p)supset E_0(mathbb{Q}_p) supset E_1(mathbb{Q}_p) supset E_2(mathbb{Q}_p) supset cdots$$
with the following properties:
- each of the successive quotients is finite: more precisely $E_r(mathbb{Q}_p)/E_{r+1}(mathbb{Q}_p) simeq (mathbb{F}_p,+)$ if $rgeq 1$, $E_0(mathbb{Q}_p)/E_1(mathbb{Q}_p) simeq tilde{E}_{ns}(mathbb{F}_p)$ where $tilde{E}_{ns}$ are the nonsingular points on the curve $E$ 'reduced modulo p' (i.e. by looking at the Weierstrass equation modulo $p$) and $E(mathbb{Q}_p)/E_0(mathbb{Q}_p)$ is trivial when $E$ has good reduction (i.e. when $E$ modulo $p$ has no singular points) but can be a nontrivial (finite) group when $E$ has bad reduction.
- if $pgeq 3$ then there's an isomorphism $E_1(mathbb{Q}_p) simeq (mathbb{Z}_p,+)$ of topological groups. If $p = 2$ then likewise $E_2(mathbb{Q}_2) simeq (mathbb{Z}_2,+)$.
- For $rgeq 1$ we can explicitly describe $E_r(mathbb{Q}_p)$ as $$E_r(mathbb{Q}_p) = left{(x,y) in E(mathbb{Q}_p) mid v(x) leq -2r , v(y) leq -3r right} cup {O_E} $$
(where $O_E$ is the identity of $E$ i.e. the unique point at infinity)
and $$E(mathbb{Q}_p) setminus E_1(mathbb{Q}_p) = {(x,y) in Emid v(x),v(y)geq 0 }$$
Now for your questions: if $P in E(mathbb{Q}_p)$ is of infinite order and $rgeq 1$ then $n.[E(mathbb{Q}_p):E_r(mathbb{Q}_p)].P$ is in $E_r(mathbb{Q}_p)$ for $ngeq 1$ and it doesn't equal $O_E$. It follows that for every prime $p$ we have that in your notation $S _p ={v_p(x) mid xin C}$ is never bounded below if the rank of $E$ is positive.
It seems that the set $S_p$ should be bounded above but I don't see an immediate argument why this is the case. Hope this helps.
edited Dec 22 '18 at 22:07
answered Dec 22 '18 at 21:50
Jef LJef L
2,876617
2,876617
$begingroup$
If $E(mathbf{Q})$ has positive rank, the closure of $E(mathbf{Q})$ is a finite index (and computable) subgroup of $E(mathbf{Q}_p)$. There are elements with large positive valuation if and only the closure contains any of the points with $X = 0$ or $Y = 0$. A necessary condition is that at least one such point actually lies in $E(mathbf{Q}_p)$, but this is not sufficient. On the other hand, it certainly can happen.
$endgroup$
– Lorem Ipsum
Dec 22 '18 at 23:42
$begingroup$
Thanks, I'll need some time to work through your answer.
$endgroup$
– Bib-lost
Dec 23 '18 at 13:06
$begingroup$
@LoremIpsum: thanks for the comment! Is there a good place to look up these claims with their proofs?
$endgroup$
– Jef L
Dec 23 '18 at 13:31
$begingroup$
But your answer pretty much already explains it! $E_1(mathbf{Q}_p)$ is a finite index subgroup of $E(mathbf{Q}_p)$, and yet is (topologically) isomorphic to $ mathbf{Z}_p$. But any non-trivial closed subgroup of $mathbf{Z}_p$ has finite index.
$endgroup$
– Lorem Ipsum
Dec 23 '18 at 14:20
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $E(mathbf{Q})$ has positive rank, the closure of $E(mathbf{Q})$ is a finite index (and computable) subgroup of $E(mathbf{Q}_p)$. There are elements with large positive valuation if and only the closure contains any of the points with $X = 0$ or $Y = 0$. A necessary condition is that at least one such point actually lies in $E(mathbf{Q}_p)$, but this is not sufficient. On the other hand, it certainly can happen.
$endgroup$
– Lorem Ipsum
Dec 22 '18 at 23:42
$begingroup$
Thanks, I'll need some time to work through your answer.
$endgroup$
– Bib-lost
Dec 23 '18 at 13:06
$begingroup$
@LoremIpsum: thanks for the comment! Is there a good place to look up these claims with their proofs?
$endgroup$
– Jef L
Dec 23 '18 at 13:31
$begingroup$
But your answer pretty much already explains it! $E_1(mathbf{Q}_p)$ is a finite index subgroup of $E(mathbf{Q}_p)$, and yet is (topologically) isomorphic to $ mathbf{Z}_p$. But any non-trivial closed subgroup of $mathbf{Z}_p$ has finite index.
$endgroup$
– Lorem Ipsum
Dec 23 '18 at 14:20
$begingroup$
If $E(mathbf{Q})$ has positive rank, the closure of $E(mathbf{Q})$ is a finite index (and computable) subgroup of $E(mathbf{Q}_p)$. There are elements with large positive valuation if and only the closure contains any of the points with $X = 0$ or $Y = 0$. A necessary condition is that at least one such point actually lies in $E(mathbf{Q}_p)$, but this is not sufficient. On the other hand, it certainly can happen.
$endgroup$
– Lorem Ipsum
Dec 22 '18 at 23:42
$begingroup$
If $E(mathbf{Q})$ has positive rank, the closure of $E(mathbf{Q})$ is a finite index (and computable) subgroup of $E(mathbf{Q}_p)$. There are elements with large positive valuation if and only the closure contains any of the points with $X = 0$ or $Y = 0$. A necessary condition is that at least one such point actually lies in $E(mathbf{Q}_p)$, but this is not sufficient. On the other hand, it certainly can happen.
$endgroup$
– Lorem Ipsum
Dec 22 '18 at 23:42
$begingroup$
Thanks, I'll need some time to work through your answer.
$endgroup$
– Bib-lost
Dec 23 '18 at 13:06
$begingroup$
Thanks, I'll need some time to work through your answer.
$endgroup$
– Bib-lost
Dec 23 '18 at 13:06
$begingroup$
@LoremIpsum: thanks for the comment! Is there a good place to look up these claims with their proofs?
$endgroup$
– Jef L
Dec 23 '18 at 13:31
$begingroup$
@LoremIpsum: thanks for the comment! Is there a good place to look up these claims with their proofs?
$endgroup$
– Jef L
Dec 23 '18 at 13:31
$begingroup$
But your answer pretty much already explains it! $E_1(mathbf{Q}_p)$ is a finite index subgroup of $E(mathbf{Q}_p)$, and yet is (topologically) isomorphic to $ mathbf{Z}_p$. But any non-trivial closed subgroup of $mathbf{Z}_p$ has finite index.
$endgroup$
– Lorem Ipsum
Dec 23 '18 at 14:20
$begingroup$
But your answer pretty much already explains it! $E_1(mathbf{Q}_p)$ is a finite index subgroup of $E(mathbf{Q}_p)$, and yet is (topologically) isomorphic to $ mathbf{Z}_p$. But any non-trivial closed subgroup of $mathbf{Z}_p$ has finite index.
$endgroup$
– Lorem Ipsum
Dec 23 '18 at 14:20
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3047646%2fp-adic-values-of-rational-points-on-elliptic-curves%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown