Is the completion of $C_0^infty(mathbb{R}^n)$ with respect to $int_{mathbb{R}^n}| nabla varphi|^2dx$...
$begingroup$
Equip $C_0^infty(mathbb{R}^n)$ with the norm
$$ |varphi|^2_1 := int_{mathbb{R}^n}| nabla varphi|^2 text{d} x.$$
Indeed, $| cdot |_1$ is a norm on $C_0^infty(mathbb{R}^n)$ because any constant function with compact support must be identically zero. Let $tilde{H}_0^1(mathbb{R}^n)$ denote the completion of $C_0^infty(mathbb{R}^n)$ with respect to the above norm. Note that $tilde{H}_0^1(mathbb{R}^n)$ is not quite the usual space $H_0^1(mathbb{R}^n)$, which is the closure of $C_0^infty(mathbb{R}^n)$ with respect to the norm $(int_{mathbb{R}^n} |varphi|^2 + | nabla varphi|^2 text{d} x)^{frac{1}{2}}$.
Are there any references that describe properties of $tilde{H}_0^1(mathbb{R}^n)$? In particular, is it true that $tilde{H}_0^1(mathbb{R}^n) subseteq L^2(mathbb{R^n})$?
I have noticed that
$$| varphi |^2_1 = int_{mathbb{R}^n} | xi|^2 |hat{varphi }(xi)|^2 text{d} x.$$
Which has led me to conjecture that functions in $tilde{H}_0^1(mathbb{R}^n)$ may be allowed to have some blow-up near zero, hence it may be that $tilde{H}_0^1(mathbb{R}^n)$ is not contained in $L^2(mathbb{R}^n)$.
Solutions or reference suggestions are greatly appreciated.
real-analysis hilbert-spaces sobolev-spaces
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Equip $C_0^infty(mathbb{R}^n)$ with the norm
$$ |varphi|^2_1 := int_{mathbb{R}^n}| nabla varphi|^2 text{d} x.$$
Indeed, $| cdot |_1$ is a norm on $C_0^infty(mathbb{R}^n)$ because any constant function with compact support must be identically zero. Let $tilde{H}_0^1(mathbb{R}^n)$ denote the completion of $C_0^infty(mathbb{R}^n)$ with respect to the above norm. Note that $tilde{H}_0^1(mathbb{R}^n)$ is not quite the usual space $H_0^1(mathbb{R}^n)$, which is the closure of $C_0^infty(mathbb{R}^n)$ with respect to the norm $(int_{mathbb{R}^n} |varphi|^2 + | nabla varphi|^2 text{d} x)^{frac{1}{2}}$.
Are there any references that describe properties of $tilde{H}_0^1(mathbb{R}^n)$? In particular, is it true that $tilde{H}_0^1(mathbb{R}^n) subseteq L^2(mathbb{R^n})$?
I have noticed that
$$| varphi |^2_1 = int_{mathbb{R}^n} | xi|^2 |hat{varphi }(xi)|^2 text{d} x.$$
Which has led me to conjecture that functions in $tilde{H}_0^1(mathbb{R}^n)$ may be allowed to have some blow-up near zero, hence it may be that $tilde{H}_0^1(mathbb{R}^n)$ is not contained in $L^2(mathbb{R}^n)$.
Solutions or reference suggestions are greatly appreciated.
real-analysis hilbert-spaces sobolev-spaces
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
@user1952009 mathworld.wolfram.com/BanachCompletion.html
$endgroup$
– Thomas
Jun 1 '16 at 18:13
$begingroup$
@thomas : yes I didn't express myself correctly, the completion of any normed vector space is a Banach space, but here do we get a weird Banach space of class of equivalence of functions, or a Banach space of measurable functions with the usual almost everywhere equivalence ?
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jun 1 '16 at 18:16
1
$begingroup$
@user1952009 Strictly speaking the metric completion is always comprised of equivalence classes of Cauchy sequences rather than elements of the space being completed. In fact this is true even when the space was already complete; the completion of $mathbb{R}$ is not $mathbb{R}$, from the set theory perspective. But we tend to ignore this because it does us little good.
$endgroup$
– Ian
Jun 1 '16 at 18:18
$begingroup$
@Ian : it seems related to the question : is it $subset L^2$ ? to me it means that if $F= G$ in his space then $F = G$ in $L^2$ ???
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jun 1 '16 at 18:21
$begingroup$
@user1952009 You can be a bit pedantic about the set theory but analysts know what is meant by "$subset L^2$". For example "$C^infty_c subset L^2$" is something we say all the time but it isn't true in the set-theoretic world.
$endgroup$
– Ian
Jun 1 '16 at 18:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Equip $C_0^infty(mathbb{R}^n)$ with the norm
$$ |varphi|^2_1 := int_{mathbb{R}^n}| nabla varphi|^2 text{d} x.$$
Indeed, $| cdot |_1$ is a norm on $C_0^infty(mathbb{R}^n)$ because any constant function with compact support must be identically zero. Let $tilde{H}_0^1(mathbb{R}^n)$ denote the completion of $C_0^infty(mathbb{R}^n)$ with respect to the above norm. Note that $tilde{H}_0^1(mathbb{R}^n)$ is not quite the usual space $H_0^1(mathbb{R}^n)$, which is the closure of $C_0^infty(mathbb{R}^n)$ with respect to the norm $(int_{mathbb{R}^n} |varphi|^2 + | nabla varphi|^2 text{d} x)^{frac{1}{2}}$.
Are there any references that describe properties of $tilde{H}_0^1(mathbb{R}^n)$? In particular, is it true that $tilde{H}_0^1(mathbb{R}^n) subseteq L^2(mathbb{R^n})$?
I have noticed that
$$| varphi |^2_1 = int_{mathbb{R}^n} | xi|^2 |hat{varphi }(xi)|^2 text{d} x.$$
Which has led me to conjecture that functions in $tilde{H}_0^1(mathbb{R}^n)$ may be allowed to have some blow-up near zero, hence it may be that $tilde{H}_0^1(mathbb{R}^n)$ is not contained in $L^2(mathbb{R}^n)$.
Solutions or reference suggestions are greatly appreciated.
real-analysis hilbert-spaces sobolev-spaces
$endgroup$
Equip $C_0^infty(mathbb{R}^n)$ with the norm
$$ |varphi|^2_1 := int_{mathbb{R}^n}| nabla varphi|^2 text{d} x.$$
Indeed, $| cdot |_1$ is a norm on $C_0^infty(mathbb{R}^n)$ because any constant function with compact support must be identically zero. Let $tilde{H}_0^1(mathbb{R}^n)$ denote the completion of $C_0^infty(mathbb{R}^n)$ with respect to the above norm. Note that $tilde{H}_0^1(mathbb{R}^n)$ is not quite the usual space $H_0^1(mathbb{R}^n)$, which is the closure of $C_0^infty(mathbb{R}^n)$ with respect to the norm $(int_{mathbb{R}^n} |varphi|^2 + | nabla varphi|^2 text{d} x)^{frac{1}{2}}$.
Are there any references that describe properties of $tilde{H}_0^1(mathbb{R}^n)$? In particular, is it true that $tilde{H}_0^1(mathbb{R}^n) subseteq L^2(mathbb{R^n})$?
I have noticed that
$$| varphi |^2_1 = int_{mathbb{R}^n} | xi|^2 |hat{varphi }(xi)|^2 text{d} x.$$
Which has led me to conjecture that functions in $tilde{H}_0^1(mathbb{R}^n)$ may be allowed to have some blow-up near zero, hence it may be that $tilde{H}_0^1(mathbb{R}^n)$ is not contained in $L^2(mathbb{R}^n)$.
Solutions or reference suggestions are greatly appreciated.
real-analysis hilbert-spaces sobolev-spaces
real-analysis hilbert-spaces sobolev-spaces
edited Dec 20 '18 at 12:15
Falrach
1,701224
1,701224
asked Jun 1 '16 at 17:48
JZShapiroJZShapiro
1,99511125
1,99511125
$begingroup$
@user1952009 mathworld.wolfram.com/BanachCompletion.html
$endgroup$
– Thomas
Jun 1 '16 at 18:13
$begingroup$
@thomas : yes I didn't express myself correctly, the completion of any normed vector space is a Banach space, but here do we get a weird Banach space of class of equivalence of functions, or a Banach space of measurable functions with the usual almost everywhere equivalence ?
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jun 1 '16 at 18:16
1
$begingroup$
@user1952009 Strictly speaking the metric completion is always comprised of equivalence classes of Cauchy sequences rather than elements of the space being completed. In fact this is true even when the space was already complete; the completion of $mathbb{R}$ is not $mathbb{R}$, from the set theory perspective. But we tend to ignore this because it does us little good.
$endgroup$
– Ian
Jun 1 '16 at 18:18
$begingroup$
@Ian : it seems related to the question : is it $subset L^2$ ? to me it means that if $F= G$ in his space then $F = G$ in $L^2$ ???
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jun 1 '16 at 18:21
$begingroup$
@user1952009 You can be a bit pedantic about the set theory but analysts know what is meant by "$subset L^2$". For example "$C^infty_c subset L^2$" is something we say all the time but it isn't true in the set-theoretic world.
$endgroup$
– Ian
Jun 1 '16 at 18:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
@user1952009 mathworld.wolfram.com/BanachCompletion.html
$endgroup$
– Thomas
Jun 1 '16 at 18:13
$begingroup$
@thomas : yes I didn't express myself correctly, the completion of any normed vector space is a Banach space, but here do we get a weird Banach space of class of equivalence of functions, or a Banach space of measurable functions with the usual almost everywhere equivalence ?
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jun 1 '16 at 18:16
1
$begingroup$
@user1952009 Strictly speaking the metric completion is always comprised of equivalence classes of Cauchy sequences rather than elements of the space being completed. In fact this is true even when the space was already complete; the completion of $mathbb{R}$ is not $mathbb{R}$, from the set theory perspective. But we tend to ignore this because it does us little good.
$endgroup$
– Ian
Jun 1 '16 at 18:18
$begingroup$
@Ian : it seems related to the question : is it $subset L^2$ ? to me it means that if $F= G$ in his space then $F = G$ in $L^2$ ???
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jun 1 '16 at 18:21
$begingroup$
@user1952009 You can be a bit pedantic about the set theory but analysts know what is meant by "$subset L^2$". For example "$C^infty_c subset L^2$" is something we say all the time but it isn't true in the set-theoretic world.
$endgroup$
– Ian
Jun 1 '16 at 18:22
$begingroup$
@user1952009 mathworld.wolfram.com/BanachCompletion.html
$endgroup$
– Thomas
Jun 1 '16 at 18:13
$begingroup$
@user1952009 mathworld.wolfram.com/BanachCompletion.html
$endgroup$
– Thomas
Jun 1 '16 at 18:13
$begingroup$
@thomas : yes I didn't express myself correctly, the completion of any normed vector space is a Banach space, but here do we get a weird Banach space of class of equivalence of functions, or a Banach space of measurable functions with the usual almost everywhere equivalence ?
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jun 1 '16 at 18:16
$begingroup$
@thomas : yes I didn't express myself correctly, the completion of any normed vector space is a Banach space, but here do we get a weird Banach space of class of equivalence of functions, or a Banach space of measurable functions with the usual almost everywhere equivalence ?
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jun 1 '16 at 18:16
1
1
$begingroup$
@user1952009 Strictly speaking the metric completion is always comprised of equivalence classes of Cauchy sequences rather than elements of the space being completed. In fact this is true even when the space was already complete; the completion of $mathbb{R}$ is not $mathbb{R}$, from the set theory perspective. But we tend to ignore this because it does us little good.
$endgroup$
– Ian
Jun 1 '16 at 18:18
$begingroup$
@user1952009 Strictly speaking the metric completion is always comprised of equivalence classes of Cauchy sequences rather than elements of the space being completed. In fact this is true even when the space was already complete; the completion of $mathbb{R}$ is not $mathbb{R}$, from the set theory perspective. But we tend to ignore this because it does us little good.
$endgroup$
– Ian
Jun 1 '16 at 18:18
$begingroup$
@Ian : it seems related to the question : is it $subset L^2$ ? to me it means that if $F= G$ in his space then $F = G$ in $L^2$ ???
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jun 1 '16 at 18:21
$begingroup$
@Ian : it seems related to the question : is it $subset L^2$ ? to me it means that if $F= G$ in his space then $F = G$ in $L^2$ ???
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jun 1 '16 at 18:21
$begingroup$
@user1952009 You can be a bit pedantic about the set theory but analysts know what is meant by "$subset L^2$". For example "$C^infty_c subset L^2$" is something we say all the time but it isn't true in the set-theoretic world.
$endgroup$
– Ian
Jun 1 '16 at 18:22
$begingroup$
@user1952009 You can be a bit pedantic about the set theory but analysts know what is meant by "$subset L^2$". For example "$C^infty_c subset L^2$" is something we say all the time but it isn't true in the set-theoretic world.
$endgroup$
– Ian
Jun 1 '16 at 18:22
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The answer is no in general: Take for instance $u(x)= eta(x) |x|^{-n/p}$, where $eta$ is a smooth function that is zero in a neighborhood of the origin and is identically one outside of some big ball centered at the origin. You can check by polar coordinates that $nabla uin L^p$, but $unotin L^p$ (to check that test functions approximate $u$ you can use the usual cut-off functions $psi_R(x)=psi(x/R)$ for $psiin C_c^infty$ that is identically one in the unit ball).
What is true however is that this space is contained in $L^{2n/(n-2)}$ by the Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequality.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1808634%2fis-the-completion-of-c-0-infty-mathbbrn-with-respect-to-int-mathbbr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The answer is no in general: Take for instance $u(x)= eta(x) |x|^{-n/p}$, where $eta$ is a smooth function that is zero in a neighborhood of the origin and is identically one outside of some big ball centered at the origin. You can check by polar coordinates that $nabla uin L^p$, but $unotin L^p$ (to check that test functions approximate $u$ you can use the usual cut-off functions $psi_R(x)=psi(x/R)$ for $psiin C_c^infty$ that is identically one in the unit ball).
What is true however is that this space is contained in $L^{2n/(n-2)}$ by the Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequality.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The answer is no in general: Take for instance $u(x)= eta(x) |x|^{-n/p}$, where $eta$ is a smooth function that is zero in a neighborhood of the origin and is identically one outside of some big ball centered at the origin. You can check by polar coordinates that $nabla uin L^p$, but $unotin L^p$ (to check that test functions approximate $u$ you can use the usual cut-off functions $psi_R(x)=psi(x/R)$ for $psiin C_c^infty$ that is identically one in the unit ball).
What is true however is that this space is contained in $L^{2n/(n-2)}$ by the Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequality.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The answer is no in general: Take for instance $u(x)= eta(x) |x|^{-n/p}$, where $eta$ is a smooth function that is zero in a neighborhood of the origin and is identically one outside of some big ball centered at the origin. You can check by polar coordinates that $nabla uin L^p$, but $unotin L^p$ (to check that test functions approximate $u$ you can use the usual cut-off functions $psi_R(x)=psi(x/R)$ for $psiin C_c^infty$ that is identically one in the unit ball).
What is true however is that this space is contained in $L^{2n/(n-2)}$ by the Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequality.
$endgroup$
The answer is no in general: Take for instance $u(x)= eta(x) |x|^{-n/p}$, where $eta$ is a smooth function that is zero in a neighborhood of the origin and is identically one outside of some big ball centered at the origin. You can check by polar coordinates that $nabla uin L^p$, but $unotin L^p$ (to check that test functions approximate $u$ you can use the usual cut-off functions $psi_R(x)=psi(x/R)$ for $psiin C_c^infty$ that is identically one in the unit ball).
What is true however is that this space is contained in $L^{2n/(n-2)}$ by the Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequality.
answered Jun 3 '16 at 1:49
Jose27Jose27
6,30011012
6,30011012
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1808634%2fis-the-completion-of-c-0-infty-mathbbrn-with-respect-to-int-mathbbr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
@user1952009 mathworld.wolfram.com/BanachCompletion.html
$endgroup$
– Thomas
Jun 1 '16 at 18:13
$begingroup$
@thomas : yes I didn't express myself correctly, the completion of any normed vector space is a Banach space, but here do we get a weird Banach space of class of equivalence of functions, or a Banach space of measurable functions with the usual almost everywhere equivalence ?
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jun 1 '16 at 18:16
1
$begingroup$
@user1952009 Strictly speaking the metric completion is always comprised of equivalence classes of Cauchy sequences rather than elements of the space being completed. In fact this is true even when the space was already complete; the completion of $mathbb{R}$ is not $mathbb{R}$, from the set theory perspective. But we tend to ignore this because it does us little good.
$endgroup$
– Ian
Jun 1 '16 at 18:18
$begingroup$
@Ian : it seems related to the question : is it $subset L^2$ ? to me it means that if $F= G$ in his space then $F = G$ in $L^2$ ???
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jun 1 '16 at 18:21
$begingroup$
@user1952009 You can be a bit pedantic about the set theory but analysts know what is meant by "$subset L^2$". For example "$C^infty_c subset L^2$" is something we say all the time but it isn't true in the set-theoretic world.
$endgroup$
– Ian
Jun 1 '16 at 18:22