Maximum number of umbrellas that can be added in a one kilometer beach?












3












$begingroup$


Suppose we have a beach of length $1-$km. Suppose one Day $0$, the beach is empty.



One day $1$, a family comes and puts their umbrella at some point in the beach. This point is fixed forever and cannot be moved.



On day $2$, a new family comes and puts their umbrella in a new coordinate. This umbrella is now fixed forever. However, we are guaranteed that the intervals $[0,frac{1}{2}], [frac{1}{2},1]$ each have $1$ umbrella; the old and the new one.



In general, on day $i$, a new family comes in and fixes a new umbrella. We're guranteed that the interval $[0,frac{1}{i}], ..., [1-frac{1}{i}, 1]$ all have one umbrella each.



The question is, what is the maximum day $t$ such that we cannot add a new umbrella where the $t$ sub intervals would have $1$ umbrella each?



The question answer say $18$, but I don't see how this is true?! Shouldn't we be able to keep going forever?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Can you present a way to place umbrellas with which we can keep going for ever while satisfying the interval condition?
    $endgroup$
    – Benedict Randall Shaw
    Dec 20 '18 at 16:41










  • $begingroup$
    Are the families trying to fit this pattern or is the problem claiming it always works? For example, suppose after day $2$ there is an umbrella just slightly to the left of $frac{1}{2}$ and another just slightly to the right of $frac{1}{2}$ so that both are contained in $(frac{1}{3},frac{2}{3})$. How can we place a third umbrella so that the condition is met?
    $endgroup$
    – John Douma
    Dec 20 '18 at 16:58












  • $begingroup$
    The families are trying to fit this pattern for as long as possible
    $endgroup$
    – AspiringMat
    Dec 20 '18 at 16:59










  • $begingroup$
    So they can agree on where to put their umbrellas from the start to keep this going as long as possible
    $endgroup$
    – AspiringMat
    Dec 20 '18 at 17:00






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I have seen this problem before, and the proof is by distinguishing many many cases and brute force/exhaustion. There is nothing deep, just track which are the possible intervals for the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc. umbrellas after the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc. round.
    $endgroup$
    – Servaes
    Dec 20 '18 at 17:59


















3












$begingroup$


Suppose we have a beach of length $1-$km. Suppose one Day $0$, the beach is empty.



One day $1$, a family comes and puts their umbrella at some point in the beach. This point is fixed forever and cannot be moved.



On day $2$, a new family comes and puts their umbrella in a new coordinate. This umbrella is now fixed forever. However, we are guaranteed that the intervals $[0,frac{1}{2}], [frac{1}{2},1]$ each have $1$ umbrella; the old and the new one.



In general, on day $i$, a new family comes in and fixes a new umbrella. We're guranteed that the interval $[0,frac{1}{i}], ..., [1-frac{1}{i}, 1]$ all have one umbrella each.



The question is, what is the maximum day $t$ such that we cannot add a new umbrella where the $t$ sub intervals would have $1$ umbrella each?



The question answer say $18$, but I don't see how this is true?! Shouldn't we be able to keep going forever?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Can you present a way to place umbrellas with which we can keep going for ever while satisfying the interval condition?
    $endgroup$
    – Benedict Randall Shaw
    Dec 20 '18 at 16:41










  • $begingroup$
    Are the families trying to fit this pattern or is the problem claiming it always works? For example, suppose after day $2$ there is an umbrella just slightly to the left of $frac{1}{2}$ and another just slightly to the right of $frac{1}{2}$ so that both are contained in $(frac{1}{3},frac{2}{3})$. How can we place a third umbrella so that the condition is met?
    $endgroup$
    – John Douma
    Dec 20 '18 at 16:58












  • $begingroup$
    The families are trying to fit this pattern for as long as possible
    $endgroup$
    – AspiringMat
    Dec 20 '18 at 16:59










  • $begingroup$
    So they can agree on where to put their umbrellas from the start to keep this going as long as possible
    $endgroup$
    – AspiringMat
    Dec 20 '18 at 17:00






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I have seen this problem before, and the proof is by distinguishing many many cases and brute force/exhaustion. There is nothing deep, just track which are the possible intervals for the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc. umbrellas after the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc. round.
    $endgroup$
    – Servaes
    Dec 20 '18 at 17:59
















3












3








3





$begingroup$


Suppose we have a beach of length $1-$km. Suppose one Day $0$, the beach is empty.



One day $1$, a family comes and puts their umbrella at some point in the beach. This point is fixed forever and cannot be moved.



On day $2$, a new family comes and puts their umbrella in a new coordinate. This umbrella is now fixed forever. However, we are guaranteed that the intervals $[0,frac{1}{2}], [frac{1}{2},1]$ each have $1$ umbrella; the old and the new one.



In general, on day $i$, a new family comes in and fixes a new umbrella. We're guranteed that the interval $[0,frac{1}{i}], ..., [1-frac{1}{i}, 1]$ all have one umbrella each.



The question is, what is the maximum day $t$ such that we cannot add a new umbrella where the $t$ sub intervals would have $1$ umbrella each?



The question answer say $18$, but I don't see how this is true?! Shouldn't we be able to keep going forever?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Suppose we have a beach of length $1-$km. Suppose one Day $0$, the beach is empty.



One day $1$, a family comes and puts their umbrella at some point in the beach. This point is fixed forever and cannot be moved.



On day $2$, a new family comes and puts their umbrella in a new coordinate. This umbrella is now fixed forever. However, we are guaranteed that the intervals $[0,frac{1}{2}], [frac{1}{2},1]$ each have $1$ umbrella; the old and the new one.



In general, on day $i$, a new family comes in and fixes a new umbrella. We're guranteed that the interval $[0,frac{1}{i}], ..., [1-frac{1}{i}, 1]$ all have one umbrella each.



The question is, what is the maximum day $t$ such that we cannot add a new umbrella where the $t$ sub intervals would have $1$ umbrella each?



The question answer say $18$, but I don't see how this is true?! Shouldn't we be able to keep going forever?







puzzle combinatorial-geometry






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 20 '18 at 16:36









AspiringMatAspiringMat

540518




540518








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Can you present a way to place umbrellas with which we can keep going for ever while satisfying the interval condition?
    $endgroup$
    – Benedict Randall Shaw
    Dec 20 '18 at 16:41










  • $begingroup$
    Are the families trying to fit this pattern or is the problem claiming it always works? For example, suppose after day $2$ there is an umbrella just slightly to the left of $frac{1}{2}$ and another just slightly to the right of $frac{1}{2}$ so that both are contained in $(frac{1}{3},frac{2}{3})$. How can we place a third umbrella so that the condition is met?
    $endgroup$
    – John Douma
    Dec 20 '18 at 16:58












  • $begingroup$
    The families are trying to fit this pattern for as long as possible
    $endgroup$
    – AspiringMat
    Dec 20 '18 at 16:59










  • $begingroup$
    So they can agree on where to put their umbrellas from the start to keep this going as long as possible
    $endgroup$
    – AspiringMat
    Dec 20 '18 at 17:00






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I have seen this problem before, and the proof is by distinguishing many many cases and brute force/exhaustion. There is nothing deep, just track which are the possible intervals for the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc. umbrellas after the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc. round.
    $endgroup$
    – Servaes
    Dec 20 '18 at 17:59
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Can you present a way to place umbrellas with which we can keep going for ever while satisfying the interval condition?
    $endgroup$
    – Benedict Randall Shaw
    Dec 20 '18 at 16:41










  • $begingroup$
    Are the families trying to fit this pattern or is the problem claiming it always works? For example, suppose after day $2$ there is an umbrella just slightly to the left of $frac{1}{2}$ and another just slightly to the right of $frac{1}{2}$ so that both are contained in $(frac{1}{3},frac{2}{3})$. How can we place a third umbrella so that the condition is met?
    $endgroup$
    – John Douma
    Dec 20 '18 at 16:58












  • $begingroup$
    The families are trying to fit this pattern for as long as possible
    $endgroup$
    – AspiringMat
    Dec 20 '18 at 16:59










  • $begingroup$
    So they can agree on where to put their umbrellas from the start to keep this going as long as possible
    $endgroup$
    – AspiringMat
    Dec 20 '18 at 17:00






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I have seen this problem before, and the proof is by distinguishing many many cases and brute force/exhaustion. There is nothing deep, just track which are the possible intervals for the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc. umbrellas after the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc. round.
    $endgroup$
    – Servaes
    Dec 20 '18 at 17:59










1




1




$begingroup$
Can you present a way to place umbrellas with which we can keep going for ever while satisfying the interval condition?
$endgroup$
– Benedict Randall Shaw
Dec 20 '18 at 16:41




$begingroup$
Can you present a way to place umbrellas with which we can keep going for ever while satisfying the interval condition?
$endgroup$
– Benedict Randall Shaw
Dec 20 '18 at 16:41












$begingroup$
Are the families trying to fit this pattern or is the problem claiming it always works? For example, suppose after day $2$ there is an umbrella just slightly to the left of $frac{1}{2}$ and another just slightly to the right of $frac{1}{2}$ so that both are contained in $(frac{1}{3},frac{2}{3})$. How can we place a third umbrella so that the condition is met?
$endgroup$
– John Douma
Dec 20 '18 at 16:58






$begingroup$
Are the families trying to fit this pattern or is the problem claiming it always works? For example, suppose after day $2$ there is an umbrella just slightly to the left of $frac{1}{2}$ and another just slightly to the right of $frac{1}{2}$ so that both are contained in $(frac{1}{3},frac{2}{3})$. How can we place a third umbrella so that the condition is met?
$endgroup$
– John Douma
Dec 20 '18 at 16:58














$begingroup$
The families are trying to fit this pattern for as long as possible
$endgroup$
– AspiringMat
Dec 20 '18 at 16:59




$begingroup$
The families are trying to fit this pattern for as long as possible
$endgroup$
– AspiringMat
Dec 20 '18 at 16:59












$begingroup$
So they can agree on where to put their umbrellas from the start to keep this going as long as possible
$endgroup$
– AspiringMat
Dec 20 '18 at 17:00




$begingroup$
So they can agree on where to put their umbrellas from the start to keep this going as long as possible
$endgroup$
– AspiringMat
Dec 20 '18 at 17:00




1




1




$begingroup$
I have seen this problem before, and the proof is by distinguishing many many cases and brute force/exhaustion. There is nothing deep, just track which are the possible intervals for the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc. umbrellas after the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc. round.
$endgroup$
– Servaes
Dec 20 '18 at 17:59






$begingroup$
I have seen this problem before, and the proof is by distinguishing many many cases and brute force/exhaustion. There is nothing deep, just track which are the possible intervals for the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc. umbrellas after the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc. round.
$endgroup$
– Servaes
Dec 20 '18 at 17:59












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3047720%2fmaximum-number-of-umbrellas-that-can-be-added-in-a-one-kilometer-beach%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3047720%2fmaximum-number-of-umbrellas-that-can-be-added-in-a-one-kilometer-beach%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Aardman Animations

Are they similar matrix

“minimization” problem in Euclidean space related to orthonormal basis