Windows Server 2012 running at low Maximum Frequency even under full load
A Windows 2012 Server (system specs below) is running at 0-20% Max Frequency only despite being under full load, CPU usage constantly at >=100%. (according to Ressource Monitor, picture below). Why is is not going to 100% Max Frequency? I feel i'm not getting the full processing power.
Power Plan is set to High Performance.
Ressource Monitor
Server specs
cpu windows-server-2012-r2
|
show 1 more comment
A Windows 2012 Server (system specs below) is running at 0-20% Max Frequency only despite being under full load, CPU usage constantly at >=100%. (according to Ressource Monitor, picture below). Why is is not going to 100% Max Frequency? I feel i'm not getting the full processing power.
Power Plan is set to High Performance.
Ressource Monitor
Server specs
cpu windows-server-2012-r2
Looks like java's just a low priority, and doesn't warrant speeding up over. But how are the temperatures?
– Xen2050
Feb 6 at 4:41
temperatures according to HWMonitor between 35 and 40.
– Christoph Strehl
Feb 6 at 10:21
Priority raised from normal to real-time, but no different behavior
– Christoph Strehl
Feb 6 at 10:21
What are you using to monitor the frequency, and is it accurate? Does the priority you changed (in resource monitor?) make a difference to the frequency governor? Is it a 3rd party program controlling the frequency?
– Xen2050
Feb 6 at 11:44
I only use the Windows Resource Monitor to monitor the Frequency. Is that not reliable? On other servers I always get stable 100% Maximum Frequencies when under full load.
– Christoph Strehl
Feb 6 at 19:32
|
show 1 more comment
A Windows 2012 Server (system specs below) is running at 0-20% Max Frequency only despite being under full load, CPU usage constantly at >=100%. (according to Ressource Monitor, picture below). Why is is not going to 100% Max Frequency? I feel i'm not getting the full processing power.
Power Plan is set to High Performance.
Ressource Monitor
Server specs
cpu windows-server-2012-r2
A Windows 2012 Server (system specs below) is running at 0-20% Max Frequency only despite being under full load, CPU usage constantly at >=100%. (according to Ressource Monitor, picture below). Why is is not going to 100% Max Frequency? I feel i'm not getting the full processing power.
Power Plan is set to High Performance.
Ressource Monitor
Server specs
cpu windows-server-2012-r2
cpu windows-server-2012-r2
asked Feb 6 at 2:02
Christoph StrehlChristoph Strehl
1
1
Looks like java's just a low priority, and doesn't warrant speeding up over. But how are the temperatures?
– Xen2050
Feb 6 at 4:41
temperatures according to HWMonitor between 35 and 40.
– Christoph Strehl
Feb 6 at 10:21
Priority raised from normal to real-time, but no different behavior
– Christoph Strehl
Feb 6 at 10:21
What are you using to monitor the frequency, and is it accurate? Does the priority you changed (in resource monitor?) make a difference to the frequency governor? Is it a 3rd party program controlling the frequency?
– Xen2050
Feb 6 at 11:44
I only use the Windows Resource Monitor to monitor the Frequency. Is that not reliable? On other servers I always get stable 100% Maximum Frequencies when under full load.
– Christoph Strehl
Feb 6 at 19:32
|
show 1 more comment
Looks like java's just a low priority, and doesn't warrant speeding up over. But how are the temperatures?
– Xen2050
Feb 6 at 4:41
temperatures according to HWMonitor between 35 and 40.
– Christoph Strehl
Feb 6 at 10:21
Priority raised from normal to real-time, but no different behavior
– Christoph Strehl
Feb 6 at 10:21
What are you using to monitor the frequency, and is it accurate? Does the priority you changed (in resource monitor?) make a difference to the frequency governor? Is it a 3rd party program controlling the frequency?
– Xen2050
Feb 6 at 11:44
I only use the Windows Resource Monitor to monitor the Frequency. Is that not reliable? On other servers I always get stable 100% Maximum Frequencies when under full load.
– Christoph Strehl
Feb 6 at 19:32
Looks like java's just a low priority, and doesn't warrant speeding up over. But how are the temperatures?
– Xen2050
Feb 6 at 4:41
Looks like java's just a low priority, and doesn't warrant speeding up over. But how are the temperatures?
– Xen2050
Feb 6 at 4:41
temperatures according to HWMonitor between 35 and 40.
– Christoph Strehl
Feb 6 at 10:21
temperatures according to HWMonitor between 35 and 40.
– Christoph Strehl
Feb 6 at 10:21
Priority raised from normal to real-time, but no different behavior
– Christoph Strehl
Feb 6 at 10:21
Priority raised from normal to real-time, but no different behavior
– Christoph Strehl
Feb 6 at 10:21
What are you using to monitor the frequency, and is it accurate? Does the priority you changed (in resource monitor?) make a difference to the frequency governor? Is it a 3rd party program controlling the frequency?
– Xen2050
Feb 6 at 11:44
What are you using to monitor the frequency, and is it accurate? Does the priority you changed (in resource monitor?) make a difference to the frequency governor? Is it a 3rd party program controlling the frequency?
– Xen2050
Feb 6 at 11:44
I only use the Windows Resource Monitor to monitor the Frequency. Is that not reliable? On other servers I always get stable 100% Maximum Frequencies when under full load.
– Christoph Strehl
Feb 6 at 19:32
I only use the Windows Resource Monitor to monitor the Frequency. Is that not reliable? On other servers I always get stable 100% Maximum Frequencies when under full load.
– Christoph Strehl
Feb 6 at 19:32
|
show 1 more comment
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1402494%2fwindows-server-2012-running-at-low-maximum-frequency-even-under-full-load%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1402494%2fwindows-server-2012-running-at-low-maximum-frequency-even-under-full-load%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Looks like java's just a low priority, and doesn't warrant speeding up over. But how are the temperatures?
– Xen2050
Feb 6 at 4:41
temperatures according to HWMonitor between 35 and 40.
– Christoph Strehl
Feb 6 at 10:21
Priority raised from normal to real-time, but no different behavior
– Christoph Strehl
Feb 6 at 10:21
What are you using to monitor the frequency, and is it accurate? Does the priority you changed (in resource monitor?) make a difference to the frequency governor? Is it a 3rd party program controlling the frequency?
– Xen2050
Feb 6 at 11:44
I only use the Windows Resource Monitor to monitor the Frequency. Is that not reliable? On other servers I always get stable 100% Maximum Frequencies when under full load.
– Christoph Strehl
Feb 6 at 19:32