Star and Delta Connections using Circuitikz












2














I am making the delta and star connections in circuitikz. But I have some problems stylizing ...



For the Star Connection:



documentclass[border=3mm]{standalone}
usepackage{circuitikz}
begin{document}
begin{circuitikz} draw

(2.5,1.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-a1) {a}
(0,1) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-a2) {a}
(2.5,1) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-b1) {b}
(1.5,1) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-b2) {b}
(2.5,0) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-c1) {c}
(0.75,0) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-c2) {c}
(2.5,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-n1) {N}
(0.75,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-n2) {N}
(circ-c2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-n2)
(circ-n2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-b2)
(circ-n2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-a2)
(circ-b1) -- (circ-b2)
(circ-c1) -- (circ-c2)
(circ-n1) -- (circ-n2)
(circ-a1) -- ++ (-2.5,0) -- (circ-a2)

;end{circuitikz}
end{document}


enter image description here



And for the Delta:



documentclass[border=3mm]{standalone}
usepackage{circuitikz}
begin{document}
begin{circuitikz} draw

(2.5,1.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-a1) {a}
(1,1.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-a2) {a}
(2.5,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-b1) {b}
(2,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-b2) {b}
(2.5,0) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-c1) {c}
(0,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-c2) {c}
(circ-b2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-a2)
(circ-c2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-a2)
(circ-c2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-b2)
(circ-a1) -- (circ-a2)
(circ-b1) -- (circ-b2)
(circ-c1) -- ++ (-2.5,0) -- (circ-c2)
;end{circuitikz}

end{document}


enter image description here



I would like the Indices to be observable without changing the size of the nodes. And there are some lines I would like to remove. Also I want to know if there is a way to place the polarity in the voltage sources. Something similar to these images:



enter image description here



enter image description here










share|improve this question



























    2














    I am making the delta and star connections in circuitikz. But I have some problems stylizing ...



    For the Star Connection:



    documentclass[border=3mm]{standalone}
    usepackage{circuitikz}
    begin{document}
    begin{circuitikz} draw

    (2.5,1.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-a1) {a}
    (0,1) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-a2) {a}
    (2.5,1) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-b1) {b}
    (1.5,1) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-b2) {b}
    (2.5,0) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-c1) {c}
    (0.75,0) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-c2) {c}
    (2.5,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-n1) {N}
    (0.75,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-n2) {N}
    (circ-c2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-n2)
    (circ-n2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-b2)
    (circ-n2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-a2)
    (circ-b1) -- (circ-b2)
    (circ-c1) -- (circ-c2)
    (circ-n1) -- (circ-n2)
    (circ-a1) -- ++ (-2.5,0) -- (circ-a2)

    ;end{circuitikz}
    end{document}


    enter image description here



    And for the Delta:



    documentclass[border=3mm]{standalone}
    usepackage{circuitikz}
    begin{document}
    begin{circuitikz} draw

    (2.5,1.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-a1) {a}
    (1,1.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-a2) {a}
    (2.5,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-b1) {b}
    (2,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-b2) {b}
    (2.5,0) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-c1) {c}
    (0,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-c2) {c}
    (circ-b2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-a2)
    (circ-c2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-a2)
    (circ-c2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-b2)
    (circ-a1) -- (circ-a2)
    (circ-b1) -- (circ-b2)
    (circ-c1) -- ++ (-2.5,0) -- (circ-c2)
    ;end{circuitikz}

    end{document}


    enter image description here



    I would like the Indices to be observable without changing the size of the nodes. And there are some lines I would like to remove. Also I want to know if there is a way to place the polarity in the voltage sources. Something similar to these images:



    enter image description here



    enter image description here










    share|improve this question

























      2












      2








      2







      I am making the delta and star connections in circuitikz. But I have some problems stylizing ...



      For the Star Connection:



      documentclass[border=3mm]{standalone}
      usepackage{circuitikz}
      begin{document}
      begin{circuitikz} draw

      (2.5,1.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-a1) {a}
      (0,1) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-a2) {a}
      (2.5,1) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-b1) {b}
      (1.5,1) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-b2) {b}
      (2.5,0) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-c1) {c}
      (0.75,0) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-c2) {c}
      (2.5,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-n1) {N}
      (0.75,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-n2) {N}
      (circ-c2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-n2)
      (circ-n2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-b2)
      (circ-n2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-a2)
      (circ-b1) -- (circ-b2)
      (circ-c1) -- (circ-c2)
      (circ-n1) -- (circ-n2)
      (circ-a1) -- ++ (-2.5,0) -- (circ-a2)

      ;end{circuitikz}
      end{document}


      enter image description here



      And for the Delta:



      documentclass[border=3mm]{standalone}
      usepackage{circuitikz}
      begin{document}
      begin{circuitikz} draw

      (2.5,1.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-a1) {a}
      (1,1.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-a2) {a}
      (2.5,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-b1) {b}
      (2,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-b2) {b}
      (2.5,0) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-c1) {c}
      (0,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-c2) {c}
      (circ-b2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-a2)
      (circ-c2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-a2)
      (circ-c2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-b2)
      (circ-a1) -- (circ-a2)
      (circ-b1) -- (circ-b2)
      (circ-c1) -- ++ (-2.5,0) -- (circ-c2)
      ;end{circuitikz}

      end{document}


      enter image description here



      I would like the Indices to be observable without changing the size of the nodes. And there are some lines I would like to remove. Also I want to know if there is a way to place the polarity in the voltage sources. Something similar to these images:



      enter image description here



      enter image description here










      share|improve this question













      I am making the delta and star connections in circuitikz. But I have some problems stylizing ...



      For the Star Connection:



      documentclass[border=3mm]{standalone}
      usepackage{circuitikz}
      begin{document}
      begin{circuitikz} draw

      (2.5,1.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-a1) {a}
      (0,1) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-a2) {a}
      (2.5,1) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-b1) {b}
      (1.5,1) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-b2) {b}
      (2.5,0) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-c1) {c}
      (0.75,0) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-c2) {c}
      (2.5,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-n1) {N}
      (0.75,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-n2) {N}
      (circ-c2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-n2)
      (circ-n2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-b2)
      (circ-n2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-a2)
      (circ-b1) -- (circ-b2)
      (circ-c1) -- (circ-c2)
      (circ-n1) -- (circ-n2)
      (circ-a1) -- ++ (-2.5,0) -- (circ-a2)

      ;end{circuitikz}
      end{document}


      enter image description here



      And for the Delta:



      documentclass[border=3mm]{standalone}
      usepackage{circuitikz}
      begin{document}
      begin{circuitikz} draw

      (2.5,1.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-a1) {a}
      (1,1.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-a2) {a}
      (2.5,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-b1) {b}
      (2,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-b2) {b}
      (2.5,0) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-c1) {c}
      (0,0.5) node[circ, scale=0.6] (circ-c2) {c}
      (circ-b2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-a2)
      (circ-c2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-a2)
      (circ-c2) to[/tikz/circuitikz/bipoles/length=0.7cm, sV, scale=0.5] (circ-b2)
      (circ-a1) -- (circ-a2)
      (circ-b1) -- (circ-b2)
      (circ-c1) -- ++ (-2.5,0) -- (circ-c2)
      ;end{circuitikz}

      end{document}


      enter image description here



      I would like the Indices to be observable without changing the size of the nodes. And there are some lines I would like to remove. Also I want to know if there is a way to place the polarity in the voltage sources. Something similar to these images:



      enter image description here



      enter image description here







      graphics circuitikz circuits






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Dec 16 at 3:56









      Delfin

      284




      284






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          enter image description here



          with tikz is simpler than with circuitikz



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{tikz}
          usetikzlibrary{arrows}
          tikzset{
          sV/.style = {circle, draw, fill=white,
          minimum size=6mm, inner sep=0pt, outer sep=0pt,
          node contents={Large$sim$}},
          dot/.style = {circle,fill, minimum size=2mm,
          inner sep=0pt, outer sep=0pt,
          node contents={}},
          cir/.style = {circle,draw, fill=white, minimum size=2mm,
          inner sep=0pt, outer sep=0pt,
          node contents={}}
          }
          begin{document}
          begin{tikzpicture}
          draw (0,0) node (n) [dot,label={[text=red]above:n}]
          -- node [sV,label=right:$V_{cn}$] ++ (270:2) node (c) [cir,label=below:$c$]
          (0,0) -- node [sV,label=above:$V_{bn}$] ++ ( 30:2) node (b) [cir,label=above:$b$]
          (0,0) -- node [sV,label=above:$V_{an}$] ++ (150:2) node (a) [cir,label= left:$a$];
          draw[-o] (a) |- ++ (4.5,1) node[right,text=red] (a') {A};
          draw[-o] (b) -- (b -| a'.west) node [right,text=red] {B};
          draw[-o] (n) -- (n -| a'.west) node [right,text=red] {N};
          draw[-o] (c) -- (c -| a'.west) node [right,text=red] {C};
          end{tikzpicture}

          bigskip
          begin{tikzpicture}
          draw (0,0) -- node [sV] ++ (2,0) node (b) [dot,label=below:b]
          -- node [sV] ++ (120:2) node (c) [dot,label=above:c]
          -- node [sV] ++ (240:2) node (a) [dot,label=below left:a];
          draw[-o] (a) |- ++ (3,-1) node[right] (a') {a};
          draw[-o] (b) -- (b -| a'.west) node [right] {b};
          draw[-o] (c) -- (c -| a'.west) node [right] {c};
          end{tikzpicture}

          end{document}


          note: alternate voltage source hasn't polarity (as far as i know), consequently i omit signs + and -.






          share|improve this answer





















          • I agree with you. As far as I know, alternate voltage source doesn't have polarity. But I took those last images from a book called engineering circuit analysis. Why do they have polarity in the images?
            – Delfin
            Dec 16 at 6:23










          • And also ... I liked the output using tikz ... But if it is simpler. What's the point of using circuitikz?
            – Delfin
            Dec 16 at 6:25






          • 1




            @Delfin, circuitikz is very useful for drawing more demanding electronic scheme, for example see tex.stackexchange.com/questions/395535 :-) it works fine if elements are horizontally or vertically aligned (as show my experiences). and manuals: you should always use some logic in reading it ... they can contain errors
            – Zarko
            Dec 16 at 6:58





















          2














          Here is a solution with circuitikz, which I really find easier than plain tikz (but that's a matter of personal preferences, and being one of the maintainers of circuitikz, I am biased).



          The way I write circuits (with relative and interdependent coordinates) is for making them easily adjustable and reusable. Comments in the code will explain it.



          documentclass[border=10pt]{standalone}
          usepackage[siunitx]{circuitikz}
          begin{document}
          begin{circuitikz}[
          american]
          path (0,0) coordinate(n) node[above,red]{$n$};
          % we want a star, let's use polar coordinates
          draw(n) to[sV, v =$V_{cn}$, *-o] ++(-90:3) coordinate(c) node[left,red]{$c$};
          draw(n) to[sV, v<=$V_{bn}$, *-o] ++(30:3) coordinate(b) node[above,red]{$b$};
          draw(n) to[sV, v<=$V_{an}$, *-o] ++(150:3) coordinate(a) node[left,red]{$a$};
          % leads; the first one determines the horizontal shift (coordinate hh)
          % just change the ++(5,0) here and all will move logically
          draw (c) to[short, o-o] ++(5,0) coordinate(hh) node[red,right]{$C$};
          % now we use the syntax -| ( horizontal -| vertical) to draw the wires
          draw (b) to[short, o-o] (b -| hh) node[red,right]{$B$};
          draw (n) to[short, o-o] (n -| hh) node[red,right]{$N$};
          % a is a bit more complex, because it's not straight on
          draw (a) to[short, o-] ++(0,1) coordinate(aa) % small vertical wire
          to[short,-o] (aa -| hh) node[red,right]{$A$};
          end{circuitikz}
          end{document}


          beautiful star connected generatos :-)



          Important notes about the circuit:




          1. you have to adjust the voltage directions by hand, but it's not difficult. There is a bit of long term discussion about it on the main site;

          2. try not to superimpose wires with no connections ([short]) with open connections ([short, o-]), it can be ugly (we could fill the circles, but I do not like that solution either);

          3. triangle-connection is left as an exercise for the studentreader.


          Add about the circuit (electronics professor hat on): obviously the voltages are sinusoidal, but the do have polarity: when having for example two sources, it says when and if the are both positive - it conveys the all-important concept of relative phase. If you switch one generator in a system you change the sign of power --- from dissipating to generating. So signs are relevant.






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "85"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466045%2fstar-and-delta-connections-using-circuitikz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4














            enter image description here



            with tikz is simpler than with circuitikz



            documentclass{article}
            usepackage{tikz}
            usetikzlibrary{arrows}
            tikzset{
            sV/.style = {circle, draw, fill=white,
            minimum size=6mm, inner sep=0pt, outer sep=0pt,
            node contents={Large$sim$}},
            dot/.style = {circle,fill, minimum size=2mm,
            inner sep=0pt, outer sep=0pt,
            node contents={}},
            cir/.style = {circle,draw, fill=white, minimum size=2mm,
            inner sep=0pt, outer sep=0pt,
            node contents={}}
            }
            begin{document}
            begin{tikzpicture}
            draw (0,0) node (n) [dot,label={[text=red]above:n}]
            -- node [sV,label=right:$V_{cn}$] ++ (270:2) node (c) [cir,label=below:$c$]
            (0,0) -- node [sV,label=above:$V_{bn}$] ++ ( 30:2) node (b) [cir,label=above:$b$]
            (0,0) -- node [sV,label=above:$V_{an}$] ++ (150:2) node (a) [cir,label= left:$a$];
            draw[-o] (a) |- ++ (4.5,1) node[right,text=red] (a') {A};
            draw[-o] (b) -- (b -| a'.west) node [right,text=red] {B};
            draw[-o] (n) -- (n -| a'.west) node [right,text=red] {N};
            draw[-o] (c) -- (c -| a'.west) node [right,text=red] {C};
            end{tikzpicture}

            bigskip
            begin{tikzpicture}
            draw (0,0) -- node [sV] ++ (2,0) node (b) [dot,label=below:b]
            -- node [sV] ++ (120:2) node (c) [dot,label=above:c]
            -- node [sV] ++ (240:2) node (a) [dot,label=below left:a];
            draw[-o] (a) |- ++ (3,-1) node[right] (a') {a};
            draw[-o] (b) -- (b -| a'.west) node [right] {b};
            draw[-o] (c) -- (c -| a'.west) node [right] {c};
            end{tikzpicture}

            end{document}


            note: alternate voltage source hasn't polarity (as far as i know), consequently i omit signs + and -.






            share|improve this answer





















            • I agree with you. As far as I know, alternate voltage source doesn't have polarity. But I took those last images from a book called engineering circuit analysis. Why do they have polarity in the images?
              – Delfin
              Dec 16 at 6:23










            • And also ... I liked the output using tikz ... But if it is simpler. What's the point of using circuitikz?
              – Delfin
              Dec 16 at 6:25






            • 1




              @Delfin, circuitikz is very useful for drawing more demanding electronic scheme, for example see tex.stackexchange.com/questions/395535 :-) it works fine if elements are horizontally or vertically aligned (as show my experiences). and manuals: you should always use some logic in reading it ... they can contain errors
              – Zarko
              Dec 16 at 6:58


















            4














            enter image description here



            with tikz is simpler than with circuitikz



            documentclass{article}
            usepackage{tikz}
            usetikzlibrary{arrows}
            tikzset{
            sV/.style = {circle, draw, fill=white,
            minimum size=6mm, inner sep=0pt, outer sep=0pt,
            node contents={Large$sim$}},
            dot/.style = {circle,fill, minimum size=2mm,
            inner sep=0pt, outer sep=0pt,
            node contents={}},
            cir/.style = {circle,draw, fill=white, minimum size=2mm,
            inner sep=0pt, outer sep=0pt,
            node contents={}}
            }
            begin{document}
            begin{tikzpicture}
            draw (0,0) node (n) [dot,label={[text=red]above:n}]
            -- node [sV,label=right:$V_{cn}$] ++ (270:2) node (c) [cir,label=below:$c$]
            (0,0) -- node [sV,label=above:$V_{bn}$] ++ ( 30:2) node (b) [cir,label=above:$b$]
            (0,0) -- node [sV,label=above:$V_{an}$] ++ (150:2) node (a) [cir,label= left:$a$];
            draw[-o] (a) |- ++ (4.5,1) node[right,text=red] (a') {A};
            draw[-o] (b) -- (b -| a'.west) node [right,text=red] {B};
            draw[-o] (n) -- (n -| a'.west) node [right,text=red] {N};
            draw[-o] (c) -- (c -| a'.west) node [right,text=red] {C};
            end{tikzpicture}

            bigskip
            begin{tikzpicture}
            draw (0,0) -- node [sV] ++ (2,0) node (b) [dot,label=below:b]
            -- node [sV] ++ (120:2) node (c) [dot,label=above:c]
            -- node [sV] ++ (240:2) node (a) [dot,label=below left:a];
            draw[-o] (a) |- ++ (3,-1) node[right] (a') {a};
            draw[-o] (b) -- (b -| a'.west) node [right] {b};
            draw[-o] (c) -- (c -| a'.west) node [right] {c};
            end{tikzpicture}

            end{document}


            note: alternate voltage source hasn't polarity (as far as i know), consequently i omit signs + and -.






            share|improve this answer





















            • I agree with you. As far as I know, alternate voltage source doesn't have polarity. But I took those last images from a book called engineering circuit analysis. Why do they have polarity in the images?
              – Delfin
              Dec 16 at 6:23










            • And also ... I liked the output using tikz ... But if it is simpler. What's the point of using circuitikz?
              – Delfin
              Dec 16 at 6:25






            • 1




              @Delfin, circuitikz is very useful for drawing more demanding electronic scheme, for example see tex.stackexchange.com/questions/395535 :-) it works fine if elements are horizontally or vertically aligned (as show my experiences). and manuals: you should always use some logic in reading it ... they can contain errors
              – Zarko
              Dec 16 at 6:58
















            4












            4








            4






            enter image description here



            with tikz is simpler than with circuitikz



            documentclass{article}
            usepackage{tikz}
            usetikzlibrary{arrows}
            tikzset{
            sV/.style = {circle, draw, fill=white,
            minimum size=6mm, inner sep=0pt, outer sep=0pt,
            node contents={Large$sim$}},
            dot/.style = {circle,fill, minimum size=2mm,
            inner sep=0pt, outer sep=0pt,
            node contents={}},
            cir/.style = {circle,draw, fill=white, minimum size=2mm,
            inner sep=0pt, outer sep=0pt,
            node contents={}}
            }
            begin{document}
            begin{tikzpicture}
            draw (0,0) node (n) [dot,label={[text=red]above:n}]
            -- node [sV,label=right:$V_{cn}$] ++ (270:2) node (c) [cir,label=below:$c$]
            (0,0) -- node [sV,label=above:$V_{bn}$] ++ ( 30:2) node (b) [cir,label=above:$b$]
            (0,0) -- node [sV,label=above:$V_{an}$] ++ (150:2) node (a) [cir,label= left:$a$];
            draw[-o] (a) |- ++ (4.5,1) node[right,text=red] (a') {A};
            draw[-o] (b) -- (b -| a'.west) node [right,text=red] {B};
            draw[-o] (n) -- (n -| a'.west) node [right,text=red] {N};
            draw[-o] (c) -- (c -| a'.west) node [right,text=red] {C};
            end{tikzpicture}

            bigskip
            begin{tikzpicture}
            draw (0,0) -- node [sV] ++ (2,0) node (b) [dot,label=below:b]
            -- node [sV] ++ (120:2) node (c) [dot,label=above:c]
            -- node [sV] ++ (240:2) node (a) [dot,label=below left:a];
            draw[-o] (a) |- ++ (3,-1) node[right] (a') {a};
            draw[-o] (b) -- (b -| a'.west) node [right] {b};
            draw[-o] (c) -- (c -| a'.west) node [right] {c};
            end{tikzpicture}

            end{document}


            note: alternate voltage source hasn't polarity (as far as i know), consequently i omit signs + and -.






            share|improve this answer












            enter image description here



            with tikz is simpler than with circuitikz



            documentclass{article}
            usepackage{tikz}
            usetikzlibrary{arrows}
            tikzset{
            sV/.style = {circle, draw, fill=white,
            minimum size=6mm, inner sep=0pt, outer sep=0pt,
            node contents={Large$sim$}},
            dot/.style = {circle,fill, minimum size=2mm,
            inner sep=0pt, outer sep=0pt,
            node contents={}},
            cir/.style = {circle,draw, fill=white, minimum size=2mm,
            inner sep=0pt, outer sep=0pt,
            node contents={}}
            }
            begin{document}
            begin{tikzpicture}
            draw (0,0) node (n) [dot,label={[text=red]above:n}]
            -- node [sV,label=right:$V_{cn}$] ++ (270:2) node (c) [cir,label=below:$c$]
            (0,0) -- node [sV,label=above:$V_{bn}$] ++ ( 30:2) node (b) [cir,label=above:$b$]
            (0,0) -- node [sV,label=above:$V_{an}$] ++ (150:2) node (a) [cir,label= left:$a$];
            draw[-o] (a) |- ++ (4.5,1) node[right,text=red] (a') {A};
            draw[-o] (b) -- (b -| a'.west) node [right,text=red] {B};
            draw[-o] (n) -- (n -| a'.west) node [right,text=red] {N};
            draw[-o] (c) -- (c -| a'.west) node [right,text=red] {C};
            end{tikzpicture}

            bigskip
            begin{tikzpicture}
            draw (0,0) -- node [sV] ++ (2,0) node (b) [dot,label=below:b]
            -- node [sV] ++ (120:2) node (c) [dot,label=above:c]
            -- node [sV] ++ (240:2) node (a) [dot,label=below left:a];
            draw[-o] (a) |- ++ (3,-1) node[right] (a') {a};
            draw[-o] (b) -- (b -| a'.west) node [right] {b};
            draw[-o] (c) -- (c -| a'.west) node [right] {c};
            end{tikzpicture}

            end{document}


            note: alternate voltage source hasn't polarity (as far as i know), consequently i omit signs + and -.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Dec 16 at 6:09









            Zarko

            120k865156




            120k865156












            • I agree with you. As far as I know, alternate voltage source doesn't have polarity. But I took those last images from a book called engineering circuit analysis. Why do they have polarity in the images?
              – Delfin
              Dec 16 at 6:23










            • And also ... I liked the output using tikz ... But if it is simpler. What's the point of using circuitikz?
              – Delfin
              Dec 16 at 6:25






            • 1




              @Delfin, circuitikz is very useful for drawing more demanding electronic scheme, for example see tex.stackexchange.com/questions/395535 :-) it works fine if elements are horizontally or vertically aligned (as show my experiences). and manuals: you should always use some logic in reading it ... they can contain errors
              – Zarko
              Dec 16 at 6:58




















            • I agree with you. As far as I know, alternate voltage source doesn't have polarity. But I took those last images from a book called engineering circuit analysis. Why do they have polarity in the images?
              – Delfin
              Dec 16 at 6:23










            • And also ... I liked the output using tikz ... But if it is simpler. What's the point of using circuitikz?
              – Delfin
              Dec 16 at 6:25






            • 1




              @Delfin, circuitikz is very useful for drawing more demanding electronic scheme, for example see tex.stackexchange.com/questions/395535 :-) it works fine if elements are horizontally or vertically aligned (as show my experiences). and manuals: you should always use some logic in reading it ... they can contain errors
              – Zarko
              Dec 16 at 6:58


















            I agree with you. As far as I know, alternate voltage source doesn't have polarity. But I took those last images from a book called engineering circuit analysis. Why do they have polarity in the images?
            – Delfin
            Dec 16 at 6:23




            I agree with you. As far as I know, alternate voltage source doesn't have polarity. But I took those last images from a book called engineering circuit analysis. Why do they have polarity in the images?
            – Delfin
            Dec 16 at 6:23












            And also ... I liked the output using tikz ... But if it is simpler. What's the point of using circuitikz?
            – Delfin
            Dec 16 at 6:25




            And also ... I liked the output using tikz ... But if it is simpler. What's the point of using circuitikz?
            – Delfin
            Dec 16 at 6:25




            1




            1




            @Delfin, circuitikz is very useful for drawing more demanding electronic scheme, for example see tex.stackexchange.com/questions/395535 :-) it works fine if elements are horizontally or vertically aligned (as show my experiences). and manuals: you should always use some logic in reading it ... they can contain errors
            – Zarko
            Dec 16 at 6:58






            @Delfin, circuitikz is very useful for drawing more demanding electronic scheme, for example see tex.stackexchange.com/questions/395535 :-) it works fine if elements are horizontally or vertically aligned (as show my experiences). and manuals: you should always use some logic in reading it ... they can contain errors
            – Zarko
            Dec 16 at 6:58













            2














            Here is a solution with circuitikz, which I really find easier than plain tikz (but that's a matter of personal preferences, and being one of the maintainers of circuitikz, I am biased).



            The way I write circuits (with relative and interdependent coordinates) is for making them easily adjustable and reusable. Comments in the code will explain it.



            documentclass[border=10pt]{standalone}
            usepackage[siunitx]{circuitikz}
            begin{document}
            begin{circuitikz}[
            american]
            path (0,0) coordinate(n) node[above,red]{$n$};
            % we want a star, let's use polar coordinates
            draw(n) to[sV, v =$V_{cn}$, *-o] ++(-90:3) coordinate(c) node[left,red]{$c$};
            draw(n) to[sV, v<=$V_{bn}$, *-o] ++(30:3) coordinate(b) node[above,red]{$b$};
            draw(n) to[sV, v<=$V_{an}$, *-o] ++(150:3) coordinate(a) node[left,red]{$a$};
            % leads; the first one determines the horizontal shift (coordinate hh)
            % just change the ++(5,0) here and all will move logically
            draw (c) to[short, o-o] ++(5,0) coordinate(hh) node[red,right]{$C$};
            % now we use the syntax -| ( horizontal -| vertical) to draw the wires
            draw (b) to[short, o-o] (b -| hh) node[red,right]{$B$};
            draw (n) to[short, o-o] (n -| hh) node[red,right]{$N$};
            % a is a bit more complex, because it's not straight on
            draw (a) to[short, o-] ++(0,1) coordinate(aa) % small vertical wire
            to[short,-o] (aa -| hh) node[red,right]{$A$};
            end{circuitikz}
            end{document}


            beautiful star connected generatos :-)



            Important notes about the circuit:




            1. you have to adjust the voltage directions by hand, but it's not difficult. There is a bit of long term discussion about it on the main site;

            2. try not to superimpose wires with no connections ([short]) with open connections ([short, o-]), it can be ugly (we could fill the circles, but I do not like that solution either);

            3. triangle-connection is left as an exercise for the studentreader.


            Add about the circuit (electronics professor hat on): obviously the voltages are sinusoidal, but the do have polarity: when having for example two sources, it says when and if the are both positive - it conveys the all-important concept of relative phase. If you switch one generator in a system you change the sign of power --- from dissipating to generating. So signs are relevant.






            share|improve this answer




























              2














              Here is a solution with circuitikz, which I really find easier than plain tikz (but that's a matter of personal preferences, and being one of the maintainers of circuitikz, I am biased).



              The way I write circuits (with relative and interdependent coordinates) is for making them easily adjustable and reusable. Comments in the code will explain it.



              documentclass[border=10pt]{standalone}
              usepackage[siunitx]{circuitikz}
              begin{document}
              begin{circuitikz}[
              american]
              path (0,0) coordinate(n) node[above,red]{$n$};
              % we want a star, let's use polar coordinates
              draw(n) to[sV, v =$V_{cn}$, *-o] ++(-90:3) coordinate(c) node[left,red]{$c$};
              draw(n) to[sV, v<=$V_{bn}$, *-o] ++(30:3) coordinate(b) node[above,red]{$b$};
              draw(n) to[sV, v<=$V_{an}$, *-o] ++(150:3) coordinate(a) node[left,red]{$a$};
              % leads; the first one determines the horizontal shift (coordinate hh)
              % just change the ++(5,0) here and all will move logically
              draw (c) to[short, o-o] ++(5,0) coordinate(hh) node[red,right]{$C$};
              % now we use the syntax -| ( horizontal -| vertical) to draw the wires
              draw (b) to[short, o-o] (b -| hh) node[red,right]{$B$};
              draw (n) to[short, o-o] (n -| hh) node[red,right]{$N$};
              % a is a bit more complex, because it's not straight on
              draw (a) to[short, o-] ++(0,1) coordinate(aa) % small vertical wire
              to[short,-o] (aa -| hh) node[red,right]{$A$};
              end{circuitikz}
              end{document}


              beautiful star connected generatos :-)



              Important notes about the circuit:




              1. you have to adjust the voltage directions by hand, but it's not difficult. There is a bit of long term discussion about it on the main site;

              2. try not to superimpose wires with no connections ([short]) with open connections ([short, o-]), it can be ugly (we could fill the circles, but I do not like that solution either);

              3. triangle-connection is left as an exercise for the studentreader.


              Add about the circuit (electronics professor hat on): obviously the voltages are sinusoidal, but the do have polarity: when having for example two sources, it says when and if the are both positive - it conveys the all-important concept of relative phase. If you switch one generator in a system you change the sign of power --- from dissipating to generating. So signs are relevant.






              share|improve this answer


























                2












                2








                2






                Here is a solution with circuitikz, which I really find easier than plain tikz (but that's a matter of personal preferences, and being one of the maintainers of circuitikz, I am biased).



                The way I write circuits (with relative and interdependent coordinates) is for making them easily adjustable and reusable. Comments in the code will explain it.



                documentclass[border=10pt]{standalone}
                usepackage[siunitx]{circuitikz}
                begin{document}
                begin{circuitikz}[
                american]
                path (0,0) coordinate(n) node[above,red]{$n$};
                % we want a star, let's use polar coordinates
                draw(n) to[sV, v =$V_{cn}$, *-o] ++(-90:3) coordinate(c) node[left,red]{$c$};
                draw(n) to[sV, v<=$V_{bn}$, *-o] ++(30:3) coordinate(b) node[above,red]{$b$};
                draw(n) to[sV, v<=$V_{an}$, *-o] ++(150:3) coordinate(a) node[left,red]{$a$};
                % leads; the first one determines the horizontal shift (coordinate hh)
                % just change the ++(5,0) here and all will move logically
                draw (c) to[short, o-o] ++(5,0) coordinate(hh) node[red,right]{$C$};
                % now we use the syntax -| ( horizontal -| vertical) to draw the wires
                draw (b) to[short, o-o] (b -| hh) node[red,right]{$B$};
                draw (n) to[short, o-o] (n -| hh) node[red,right]{$N$};
                % a is a bit more complex, because it's not straight on
                draw (a) to[short, o-] ++(0,1) coordinate(aa) % small vertical wire
                to[short,-o] (aa -| hh) node[red,right]{$A$};
                end{circuitikz}
                end{document}


                beautiful star connected generatos :-)



                Important notes about the circuit:




                1. you have to adjust the voltage directions by hand, but it's not difficult. There is a bit of long term discussion about it on the main site;

                2. try not to superimpose wires with no connections ([short]) with open connections ([short, o-]), it can be ugly (we could fill the circles, but I do not like that solution either);

                3. triangle-connection is left as an exercise for the studentreader.


                Add about the circuit (electronics professor hat on): obviously the voltages are sinusoidal, but the do have polarity: when having for example two sources, it says when and if the are both positive - it conveys the all-important concept of relative phase. If you switch one generator in a system you change the sign of power --- from dissipating to generating. So signs are relevant.






                share|improve this answer














                Here is a solution with circuitikz, which I really find easier than plain tikz (but that's a matter of personal preferences, and being one of the maintainers of circuitikz, I am biased).



                The way I write circuits (with relative and interdependent coordinates) is for making them easily adjustable and reusable. Comments in the code will explain it.



                documentclass[border=10pt]{standalone}
                usepackage[siunitx]{circuitikz}
                begin{document}
                begin{circuitikz}[
                american]
                path (0,0) coordinate(n) node[above,red]{$n$};
                % we want a star, let's use polar coordinates
                draw(n) to[sV, v =$V_{cn}$, *-o] ++(-90:3) coordinate(c) node[left,red]{$c$};
                draw(n) to[sV, v<=$V_{bn}$, *-o] ++(30:3) coordinate(b) node[above,red]{$b$};
                draw(n) to[sV, v<=$V_{an}$, *-o] ++(150:3) coordinate(a) node[left,red]{$a$};
                % leads; the first one determines the horizontal shift (coordinate hh)
                % just change the ++(5,0) here and all will move logically
                draw (c) to[short, o-o] ++(5,0) coordinate(hh) node[red,right]{$C$};
                % now we use the syntax -| ( horizontal -| vertical) to draw the wires
                draw (b) to[short, o-o] (b -| hh) node[red,right]{$B$};
                draw (n) to[short, o-o] (n -| hh) node[red,right]{$N$};
                % a is a bit more complex, because it's not straight on
                draw (a) to[short, o-] ++(0,1) coordinate(aa) % small vertical wire
                to[short,-o] (aa -| hh) node[red,right]{$A$};
                end{circuitikz}
                end{document}


                beautiful star connected generatos :-)



                Important notes about the circuit:




                1. you have to adjust the voltage directions by hand, but it's not difficult. There is a bit of long term discussion about it on the main site;

                2. try not to superimpose wires with no connections ([short]) with open connections ([short, o-]), it can be ugly (we could fill the circles, but I do not like that solution either);

                3. triangle-connection is left as an exercise for the studentreader.


                Add about the circuit (electronics professor hat on): obviously the voltages are sinusoidal, but the do have polarity: when having for example two sources, it says when and if the are both positive - it conveys the all-important concept of relative phase. If you switch one generator in a system you change the sign of power --- from dissipating to generating. So signs are relevant.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Dec 16 at 10:45

























                answered Dec 16 at 10:35









                Rmano

                7,75221647




                7,75221647






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466045%2fstar-and-delta-connections-using-circuitikz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Aardman Animations

                    Are they similar matrix

                    “minimization” problem in Euclidean space related to orthonormal basis