In $triangle ABC$, with $D$ on $BC$, if perpendiculars from $D$ to the other sides are equal, can we conclude...












0












$begingroup$


enter image description here



In the figure, $triangle ABC$ is a triangle. There exists a point $D$ on $BC$ such that when two perpendicular lines are drawn from $D$ to $AB$ and $AC$, respectively, $DE = DF$, where $E$ and $F$ are the intersection points. Must it be true that $triangle ABC$ is isosceles?



It should be obvious to prove that $square AEDF$ is a kite, with $AE = AF$ and $DE=DF$. However, how can we draw any conclusion about $triangle ABC$? Any help/hint is appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You're correct about the kite. Now consider: Is there anything about the situation that guarantees the kite is balancing perfectly "upright"?
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Dec 11 '18 at 8:29












  • $begingroup$
    @Blue : How about rotating BC while fixing point D? Then I may not obtain an isosceles triangle?
    $endgroup$
    – LeeNL
    Dec 11 '18 at 8:36










  • $begingroup$
    Exactly. :) ${}{}$
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Dec 11 '18 at 8:39
















0












$begingroup$


enter image description here



In the figure, $triangle ABC$ is a triangle. There exists a point $D$ on $BC$ such that when two perpendicular lines are drawn from $D$ to $AB$ and $AC$, respectively, $DE = DF$, where $E$ and $F$ are the intersection points. Must it be true that $triangle ABC$ is isosceles?



It should be obvious to prove that $square AEDF$ is a kite, with $AE = AF$ and $DE=DF$. However, how can we draw any conclusion about $triangle ABC$? Any help/hint is appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You're correct about the kite. Now consider: Is there anything about the situation that guarantees the kite is balancing perfectly "upright"?
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Dec 11 '18 at 8:29












  • $begingroup$
    @Blue : How about rotating BC while fixing point D? Then I may not obtain an isosceles triangle?
    $endgroup$
    – LeeNL
    Dec 11 '18 at 8:36










  • $begingroup$
    Exactly. :) ${}{}$
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Dec 11 '18 at 8:39














0












0








0





$begingroup$


enter image description here



In the figure, $triangle ABC$ is a triangle. There exists a point $D$ on $BC$ such that when two perpendicular lines are drawn from $D$ to $AB$ and $AC$, respectively, $DE = DF$, where $E$ and $F$ are the intersection points. Must it be true that $triangle ABC$ is isosceles?



It should be obvious to prove that $square AEDF$ is a kite, with $AE = AF$ and $DE=DF$. However, how can we draw any conclusion about $triangle ABC$? Any help/hint is appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




enter image description here



In the figure, $triangle ABC$ is a triangle. There exists a point $D$ on $BC$ such that when two perpendicular lines are drawn from $D$ to $AB$ and $AC$, respectively, $DE = DF$, where $E$ and $F$ are the intersection points. Must it be true that $triangle ABC$ is isosceles?



It should be obvious to prove that $square AEDF$ is a kite, with $AE = AF$ and $DE=DF$. However, how can we draw any conclusion about $triangle ABC$? Any help/hint is appreciated.







geometry






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 11 '18 at 8:34









Blue

48.4k870154




48.4k870154










asked Dec 11 '18 at 8:09









LeeNLLeeNL

9661129




9661129












  • $begingroup$
    You're correct about the kite. Now consider: Is there anything about the situation that guarantees the kite is balancing perfectly "upright"?
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Dec 11 '18 at 8:29












  • $begingroup$
    @Blue : How about rotating BC while fixing point D? Then I may not obtain an isosceles triangle?
    $endgroup$
    – LeeNL
    Dec 11 '18 at 8:36










  • $begingroup$
    Exactly. :) ${}{}$
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Dec 11 '18 at 8:39


















  • $begingroup$
    You're correct about the kite. Now consider: Is there anything about the situation that guarantees the kite is balancing perfectly "upright"?
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Dec 11 '18 at 8:29












  • $begingroup$
    @Blue : How about rotating BC while fixing point D? Then I may not obtain an isosceles triangle?
    $endgroup$
    – LeeNL
    Dec 11 '18 at 8:36










  • $begingroup$
    Exactly. :) ${}{}$
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Dec 11 '18 at 8:39
















$begingroup$
You're correct about the kite. Now consider: Is there anything about the situation that guarantees the kite is balancing perfectly "upright"?
$endgroup$
– Blue
Dec 11 '18 at 8:29






$begingroup$
You're correct about the kite. Now consider: Is there anything about the situation that guarantees the kite is balancing perfectly "upright"?
$endgroup$
– Blue
Dec 11 '18 at 8:29














$begingroup$
@Blue : How about rotating BC while fixing point D? Then I may not obtain an isosceles triangle?
$endgroup$
– LeeNL
Dec 11 '18 at 8:36




$begingroup$
@Blue : How about rotating BC while fixing point D? Then I may not obtain an isosceles triangle?
$endgroup$
– LeeNL
Dec 11 '18 at 8:36












$begingroup$
Exactly. :) ${}{}$
$endgroup$
– Blue
Dec 11 '18 at 8:39




$begingroup$
Exactly. :) ${}{}$
$endgroup$
– Blue
Dec 11 '18 at 8:39










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Join AD. Let angle $ADE = alpha$ and angle $ADF = beta$ then



$DE sec{alpha} =DF sec{beta} = AD$



(They both are equal to AD)



As $ DE = DF $, thus $alpha = beta$



Now $ADsin{alpha} = ADsin{beta}$
Thus $AE = AF$



Now we can see from above derived conditions that $Delta ABD$ is congruent with $Delta ACD$. Also that AD must be angle bisector of and at A.



But these conditions only fix A ,E, D and F (that they must form a cyclic quadrilateral). It doesn't tell anything about points B & C, not the queue at them.



To make it more intuitive, you can imagine that if we increase side AB a bit and reduce side AC a bit such that B, D and C remain collinear without disturbing AEFD ,triangle wouldn't be isosceles.



You can also use co-ordinate geometry to check further






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Please check the congruent triangles.
    $endgroup$
    – LeeNL
    Dec 15 '18 at 11:55



















1












$begingroup$

All we can say is that $E$ and $F$ are points of a circle with center $D$, and $BC$ is on a line that passes thorough $D$.enter image description here






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3035042%2fin-triangle-abc-with-d-on-bc-if-perpendiculars-from-d-to-the-other-si%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Join AD. Let angle $ADE = alpha$ and angle $ADF = beta$ then



    $DE sec{alpha} =DF sec{beta} = AD$



    (They both are equal to AD)



    As $ DE = DF $, thus $alpha = beta$



    Now $ADsin{alpha} = ADsin{beta}$
    Thus $AE = AF$



    Now we can see from above derived conditions that $Delta ABD$ is congruent with $Delta ACD$. Also that AD must be angle bisector of and at A.



    But these conditions only fix A ,E, D and F (that they must form a cyclic quadrilateral). It doesn't tell anything about points B & C, not the queue at them.



    To make it more intuitive, you can imagine that if we increase side AB a bit and reduce side AC a bit such that B, D and C remain collinear without disturbing AEFD ,triangle wouldn't be isosceles.



    You can also use co-ordinate geometry to check further






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Please check the congruent triangles.
      $endgroup$
      – LeeNL
      Dec 15 '18 at 11:55
















    1












    $begingroup$

    Join AD. Let angle $ADE = alpha$ and angle $ADF = beta$ then



    $DE sec{alpha} =DF sec{beta} = AD$



    (They both are equal to AD)



    As $ DE = DF $, thus $alpha = beta$



    Now $ADsin{alpha} = ADsin{beta}$
    Thus $AE = AF$



    Now we can see from above derived conditions that $Delta ABD$ is congruent with $Delta ACD$. Also that AD must be angle bisector of and at A.



    But these conditions only fix A ,E, D and F (that they must form a cyclic quadrilateral). It doesn't tell anything about points B & C, not the queue at them.



    To make it more intuitive, you can imagine that if we increase side AB a bit and reduce side AC a bit such that B, D and C remain collinear without disturbing AEFD ,triangle wouldn't be isosceles.



    You can also use co-ordinate geometry to check further






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Please check the congruent triangles.
      $endgroup$
      – LeeNL
      Dec 15 '18 at 11:55














    1












    1








    1





    $begingroup$

    Join AD. Let angle $ADE = alpha$ and angle $ADF = beta$ then



    $DE sec{alpha} =DF sec{beta} = AD$



    (They both are equal to AD)



    As $ DE = DF $, thus $alpha = beta$



    Now $ADsin{alpha} = ADsin{beta}$
    Thus $AE = AF$



    Now we can see from above derived conditions that $Delta ABD$ is congruent with $Delta ACD$. Also that AD must be angle bisector of and at A.



    But these conditions only fix A ,E, D and F (that they must form a cyclic quadrilateral). It doesn't tell anything about points B & C, not the queue at them.



    To make it more intuitive, you can imagine that if we increase side AB a bit and reduce side AC a bit such that B, D and C remain collinear without disturbing AEFD ,triangle wouldn't be isosceles.



    You can also use co-ordinate geometry to check further






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Join AD. Let angle $ADE = alpha$ and angle $ADF = beta$ then



    $DE sec{alpha} =DF sec{beta} = AD$



    (They both are equal to AD)



    As $ DE = DF $, thus $alpha = beta$



    Now $ADsin{alpha} = ADsin{beta}$
    Thus $AE = AF$



    Now we can see from above derived conditions that $Delta ABD$ is congruent with $Delta ACD$. Also that AD must be angle bisector of and at A.



    But these conditions only fix A ,E, D and F (that they must form a cyclic quadrilateral). It doesn't tell anything about points B & C, not the queue at them.



    To make it more intuitive, you can imagine that if we increase side AB a bit and reduce side AC a bit such that B, D and C remain collinear without disturbing AEFD ,triangle wouldn't be isosceles.



    You can also use co-ordinate geometry to check further







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Dec 11 '18 at 8:50









    Abhik JainAbhik Jain

    261




    261












    • $begingroup$
      Please check the congruent triangles.
      $endgroup$
      – LeeNL
      Dec 15 '18 at 11:55


















    • $begingroup$
      Please check the congruent triangles.
      $endgroup$
      – LeeNL
      Dec 15 '18 at 11:55
















    $begingroup$
    Please check the congruent triangles.
    $endgroup$
    – LeeNL
    Dec 15 '18 at 11:55




    $begingroup$
    Please check the congruent triangles.
    $endgroup$
    – LeeNL
    Dec 15 '18 at 11:55











    1












    $begingroup$

    All we can say is that $E$ and $F$ are points of a circle with center $D$, and $BC$ is on a line that passes thorough $D$.enter image description here






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      All we can say is that $E$ and $F$ are points of a circle with center $D$, and $BC$ is on a line that passes thorough $D$.enter image description here






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        All we can say is that $E$ and $F$ are points of a circle with center $D$, and $BC$ is on a line that passes thorough $D$.enter image description here






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        All we can say is that $E$ and $F$ are points of a circle with center $D$, and $BC$ is on a line that passes thorough $D$.enter image description here







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 11 '18 at 9:29









        Emilio NovatiEmilio Novati

        52k43474




        52k43474






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3035042%2fin-triangle-abc-with-d-on-bc-if-perpendiculars-from-d-to-the-other-si%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Aardman Animations

            Are they similar matrix

            “minimization” problem in Euclidean space related to orthonormal basis