Proving alternative notation of quadratic variation of Brownian motion












0












$begingroup$


Setting: Let ${W_t,tgeq 0}$ be a Brownian with respect to the standard filtration ${mathcal{F}_t,tgeq 0}$.



Problem: We fix $t>0$ and must prove that:




$left langle W,W rightrangle^{(n)}_{t}=sum^n_{j=1}(W_{frac{tj}{n}}-W_{frac{t(j-1)}{n}})^2$




Can be written as:




$left langle W,W right rangle^{(n)}_{t}=frac{t}{n}sum^n_{i=1}X_i^2$




Where $X_i$ are independent identically distributed and have a standard normal distribution.



Question: I've attempted to solve this exercise, obviously, but kept getting stuck because I think my approach is wrong. I tried writing out the sum and using telescoping but I can't seem to get factors to drop out. Writing out the first sum does yield some similar factors but the square prohibits them from dropping off against eachother. Writing out the square and then applying telescoping also provides no luck. If I can't use telescoping for this problem I'm not sure how to approach it. Any tips or advice on solving this problem?



Any help is appreciated. Thanks!






probability-theory brownian-motion







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Setting: Let ${W_t,tgeq 0}$ be a Brownian with respect to the standard filtration ${mathcal{F}_t,tgeq 0}$.



    Problem: We fix $t>0$ and must prove that:




    $left langle W,W rightrangle^{(n)}_{t}=sum^n_{j=1}(W_{frac{tj}{n}}-W_{frac{t(j-1)}{n}})^2$




    Can be written as:




    $left langle W,W right rangle^{(n)}_{t}=frac{t}{n}sum^n_{i=1}X_i^2$




    Where $X_i$ are independent identically distributed and have a standard normal distribution.



    Question: I've attempted to solve this exercise, obviously, but kept getting stuck because I think my approach is wrong. I tried writing out the sum and using telescoping but I can't seem to get factors to drop out. Writing out the first sum does yield some similar factors but the square prohibits them from dropping off against eachother. Writing out the square and then applying telescoping also provides no luck. If I can't use telescoping for this problem I'm not sure how to approach it. Any tips or advice on solving this problem?



    Any help is appreciated. Thanks!






    probability-theory brownian-motion







    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0


      1



      $begingroup$


      Setting: Let ${W_t,tgeq 0}$ be a Brownian with respect to the standard filtration ${mathcal{F}_t,tgeq 0}$.



      Problem: We fix $t>0$ and must prove that:




      $left langle W,W rightrangle^{(n)}_{t}=sum^n_{j=1}(W_{frac{tj}{n}}-W_{frac{t(j-1)}{n}})^2$




      Can be written as:




      $left langle W,W right rangle^{(n)}_{t}=frac{t}{n}sum^n_{i=1}X_i^2$




      Where $X_i$ are independent identically distributed and have a standard normal distribution.



      Question: I've attempted to solve this exercise, obviously, but kept getting stuck because I think my approach is wrong. I tried writing out the sum and using telescoping but I can't seem to get factors to drop out. Writing out the first sum does yield some similar factors but the square prohibits them from dropping off against eachother. Writing out the square and then applying telescoping also provides no luck. If I can't use telescoping for this problem I'm not sure how to approach it. Any tips or advice on solving this problem?



      Any help is appreciated. Thanks!






      probability-theory brownian-motion







      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Setting: Let ${W_t,tgeq 0}$ be a Brownian with respect to the standard filtration ${mathcal{F}_t,tgeq 0}$.



      Problem: We fix $t>0$ and must prove that:




      $left langle W,W rightrangle^{(n)}_{t}=sum^n_{j=1}(W_{frac{tj}{n}}-W_{frac{t(j-1)}{n}})^2$




      Can be written as:




      $left langle W,W right rangle^{(n)}_{t}=frac{t}{n}sum^n_{i=1}X_i^2$




      Where $X_i$ are independent identically distributed and have a standard normal distribution.



      Question: I've attempted to solve this exercise, obviously, but kept getting stuck because I think my approach is wrong. I tried writing out the sum and using telescoping but I can't seem to get factors to drop out. Writing out the first sum does yield some similar factors but the square prohibits them from dropping off against eachother. Writing out the square and then applying telescoping also provides no luck. If I can't use telescoping for this problem I'm not sure how to approach it. Any tips or advice on solving this problem?



      Any help is appreciated. Thanks!






      probability-theory brownian-motion




      probability-theory brownian-motion






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 11 '18 at 7:25









      S. CrimS. Crim

      363112




      363112






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Hints:




          1. Show that $$langle W,W rangle_t^{(n)} = sum_{j=1}^n Y_j^2$$ for independent Gaussian random variables $Y_j$, $j=1,ldots,n$. (Hint to find $Y_j$: Do not expand the square! Look at the very definition of $langle W,W rangle_t^{(n)}$ ...)

          2. Show that $mathbb{E}(Y_j)=0$ and $mathbb{E}(Y_j^2) = t/n$ for all $j=1,ldots,n$.

          3. Define $$X_j := sqrt{frac{n}{t}} Y_j, qquad j=1,ldots,n.$$ Using Step 2 prove that the so-defined random variables are independent and Standard Gaussian.

          4. Use Step 1 to show that $$langle W,Wrangle_t^{(n)} = frac{t}{n} sum_{j=1}^n X_j^2.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for the detailed hints. I reckon I should be able to solve the problem with these. If not, I'll be back. Thanks again!
            $endgroup$
            – S. Crim
            Dec 11 '18 at 7:50










          • $begingroup$
            @S.Crim You are welcome.
            $endgroup$
            – saz
            Dec 11 '18 at 8:10



















          1












          $begingroup$

          Just define $X_i= {sqrt {frac n t}} (W_{frac {tj} n}-W_{frac {t(j-1)} n})$. Use the fact that $(W_t)$ has independent increments and $W_{t+s}-W_t$ has $N(0,s)$ distribution.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3035004%2fproving-alternative-notation-of-quadratic-variation-of-brownian-motion%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            Hints:




            1. Show that $$langle W,W rangle_t^{(n)} = sum_{j=1}^n Y_j^2$$ for independent Gaussian random variables $Y_j$, $j=1,ldots,n$. (Hint to find $Y_j$: Do not expand the square! Look at the very definition of $langle W,W rangle_t^{(n)}$ ...)

            2. Show that $mathbb{E}(Y_j)=0$ and $mathbb{E}(Y_j^2) = t/n$ for all $j=1,ldots,n$.

            3. Define $$X_j := sqrt{frac{n}{t}} Y_j, qquad j=1,ldots,n.$$ Using Step 2 prove that the so-defined random variables are independent and Standard Gaussian.

            4. Use Step 1 to show that $$langle W,Wrangle_t^{(n)} = frac{t}{n} sum_{j=1}^n X_j^2.$$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for the detailed hints. I reckon I should be able to solve the problem with these. If not, I'll be back. Thanks again!
              $endgroup$
              – S. Crim
              Dec 11 '18 at 7:50










            • $begingroup$
              @S.Crim You are welcome.
              $endgroup$
              – saz
              Dec 11 '18 at 8:10
















            1












            $begingroup$

            Hints:




            1. Show that $$langle W,W rangle_t^{(n)} = sum_{j=1}^n Y_j^2$$ for independent Gaussian random variables $Y_j$, $j=1,ldots,n$. (Hint to find $Y_j$: Do not expand the square! Look at the very definition of $langle W,W rangle_t^{(n)}$ ...)

            2. Show that $mathbb{E}(Y_j)=0$ and $mathbb{E}(Y_j^2) = t/n$ for all $j=1,ldots,n$.

            3. Define $$X_j := sqrt{frac{n}{t}} Y_j, qquad j=1,ldots,n.$$ Using Step 2 prove that the so-defined random variables are independent and Standard Gaussian.

            4. Use Step 1 to show that $$langle W,Wrangle_t^{(n)} = frac{t}{n} sum_{j=1}^n X_j^2.$$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for the detailed hints. I reckon I should be able to solve the problem with these. If not, I'll be back. Thanks again!
              $endgroup$
              – S. Crim
              Dec 11 '18 at 7:50










            • $begingroup$
              @S.Crim You are welcome.
              $endgroup$
              – saz
              Dec 11 '18 at 8:10














            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            Hints:




            1. Show that $$langle W,W rangle_t^{(n)} = sum_{j=1}^n Y_j^2$$ for independent Gaussian random variables $Y_j$, $j=1,ldots,n$. (Hint to find $Y_j$: Do not expand the square! Look at the very definition of $langle W,W rangle_t^{(n)}$ ...)

            2. Show that $mathbb{E}(Y_j)=0$ and $mathbb{E}(Y_j^2) = t/n$ for all $j=1,ldots,n$.

            3. Define $$X_j := sqrt{frac{n}{t}} Y_j, qquad j=1,ldots,n.$$ Using Step 2 prove that the so-defined random variables are independent and Standard Gaussian.

            4. Use Step 1 to show that $$langle W,Wrangle_t^{(n)} = frac{t}{n} sum_{j=1}^n X_j^2.$$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Hints:




            1. Show that $$langle W,W rangle_t^{(n)} = sum_{j=1}^n Y_j^2$$ for independent Gaussian random variables $Y_j$, $j=1,ldots,n$. (Hint to find $Y_j$: Do not expand the square! Look at the very definition of $langle W,W rangle_t^{(n)}$ ...)

            2. Show that $mathbb{E}(Y_j)=0$ and $mathbb{E}(Y_j^2) = t/n$ for all $j=1,ldots,n$.

            3. Define $$X_j := sqrt{frac{n}{t}} Y_j, qquad j=1,ldots,n.$$ Using Step 2 prove that the so-defined random variables are independent and Standard Gaussian.

            4. Use Step 1 to show that $$langle W,Wrangle_t^{(n)} = frac{t}{n} sum_{j=1}^n X_j^2.$$







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Dec 11 '18 at 10:19

























            answered Dec 11 '18 at 7:38









            sazsaz

            80.5k860125




            80.5k860125












            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for the detailed hints. I reckon I should be able to solve the problem with these. If not, I'll be back. Thanks again!
              $endgroup$
              – S. Crim
              Dec 11 '18 at 7:50










            • $begingroup$
              @S.Crim You are welcome.
              $endgroup$
              – saz
              Dec 11 '18 at 8:10


















            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for the detailed hints. I reckon I should be able to solve the problem with these. If not, I'll be back. Thanks again!
              $endgroup$
              – S. Crim
              Dec 11 '18 at 7:50










            • $begingroup$
              @S.Crim You are welcome.
              $endgroup$
              – saz
              Dec 11 '18 at 8:10
















            $begingroup$
            Thank you for the detailed hints. I reckon I should be able to solve the problem with these. If not, I'll be back. Thanks again!
            $endgroup$
            – S. Crim
            Dec 11 '18 at 7:50




            $begingroup$
            Thank you for the detailed hints. I reckon I should be able to solve the problem with these. If not, I'll be back. Thanks again!
            $endgroup$
            – S. Crim
            Dec 11 '18 at 7:50












            $begingroup$
            @S.Crim You are welcome.
            $endgroup$
            – saz
            Dec 11 '18 at 8:10




            $begingroup$
            @S.Crim You are welcome.
            $endgroup$
            – saz
            Dec 11 '18 at 8:10











            1












            $begingroup$

            Just define $X_i= {sqrt {frac n t}} (W_{frac {tj} n}-W_{frac {t(j-1)} n})$. Use the fact that $(W_t)$ has independent increments and $W_{t+s}-W_t$ has $N(0,s)$ distribution.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              Just define $X_i= {sqrt {frac n t}} (W_{frac {tj} n}-W_{frac {t(j-1)} n})$. Use the fact that $(W_t)$ has independent increments and $W_{t+s}-W_t$ has $N(0,s)$ distribution.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                Just define $X_i= {sqrt {frac n t}} (W_{frac {tj} n}-W_{frac {t(j-1)} n})$. Use the fact that $(W_t)$ has independent increments and $W_{t+s}-W_t$ has $N(0,s)$ distribution.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Just define $X_i= {sqrt {frac n t}} (W_{frac {tj} n}-W_{frac {t(j-1)} n})$. Use the fact that $(W_t)$ has independent increments and $W_{t+s}-W_t$ has $N(0,s)$ distribution.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 11 '18 at 7:38









                Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

                59k42161




                59k42161






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3035004%2fproving-alternative-notation-of-quadratic-variation-of-brownian-motion%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    -

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Aardman Animations

                    Image
                    Aardman Animations, Ltd. Aardman Animations Tipo privada Atividade Animação em stop-motion , Animação em CGI Fundação 1972 Fundador(es) Peter Lord David Sproxton Sede Bristol, Inglaterra  Reino Unido Proprietário(s) Dreamworks Pessoas-chave Peter Lord David Sproxton Nick Park Divisões Aardman Features Aardman Digital Aardman Commercials Aardman Broadcast Aardman International Aardman Rights Aardman Effects Aardman 3-D Systems Aardman Nathan Love AardBoiled Website oficial aardman.com
                    Read more

                    Are they similar matrix

                    Image
                    0 $begingroup$ Do $begin{bmatrix} 0&i&0\0&0&1\0&0&0 end{bmatrix} $ and $begin{bmatrix} 0&0&0\-i&0&0\0&1&0 end{bmatrix} $ are similar.Is this True/false Clearly both are nilpotent and one is conjucate transpose of other but how to know if they are similar.i'm stuck. Please help me linear-algebra vector-spaces eigenvalues-eigenvectors generalizedeigenvector share | cite | improve this question edited Dec 10 '18 at 6:38 Vasanth Kris asked Dec 10 '18 at 6:19
                    Read more

                    “minimization” problem in Euclidean space related to orthonormal basis

                    Image
                    3 $begingroup$ I have stumbled upon an exercice for second year undegraduate student majoring in economics which I find quite demanding. I have an idea for the solution, but it seems awfully complicated, and I am wondering if there was a simpler way to solve it. This goes as follows: Let $(E, langle, rangle)$ be a euclidean space of dimension $n geq 2$ . 1) For any $x in E$ , show that $||x|| = sqrt{n}$ if and only if there exists $(e_1, dots, e_n)$ an orthonormal basis of $E$ such that $x =e_1+ ldots + e_n$ . 2) For any $(x,y) in E$ , show that $||x|| = sqrt{n}$ , $||y|| = sqrt{frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}}$ and $langle x,y rangle = frac{n(n+1)}{2}$ if and only if there eixsts $(e_1, ldots, e_n)$ an orthonormal basis of $E$ such that $x = e_1 + ldots + e_n$ and $y = e_1 + 2e_2 + ldots + ne_n$ The first q
                    Read more