How to solve these simultaneous differential equations











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I want to solve the following equations for $x_1$, $x_2$, and $x_3$



$$ K_0, x_1(t) + K_1, frac{dx_1(t)}{dt} + M_0, frac{dx_2(t)}{dt} + x_3(t) =A_0,sin (alpha_0 t) tag{1} $$



$$ M_0, frac{dx_1(t)}{dt} + L_0,x_2(t) + K_1, frac{dx_2(t)}{dt}+L_1,int x_2(t), dt =0 tag{2} $$



$$ x_1(t) -alpha_1,B_1,cos(alpha_1,t + phi) , x_3(t)- big[B_0+B_1,sin(alpha_1,t + phi) big] frac{dx_3(t)}{dt} =0 tag{3} $$



Here is my try using Laplace transform:



I can assume $x_1(0)=0$, and define $x_2(0)=x_{20}$, and $x_3(0)=x_{30}$



$$(1) Rightarrow K_0, X_1(s) + K_1, sX_1(s)+ M_0, sX_2(s)+ X_3(s) + M_0, x_{20} = frac{A_0alpha_0}{s^2+alpha_0^2} tag{4} $$



$$(2) Rightarrow M_0, X_1(s) + L_0, X_2(s) +K_1, sX_2(s)+ L_1, frac{X_2(s)}{s}+ X_3(s)+ K_1, x_{20} =0 tag{5} $$
Next step brings me the trouble. I cannot simply take the Laplace transform of (3)



Update 1 (as suggested by @Cesareo)



Using the Euler's expansion of sine and cosine (3) can be transformed to



$$ X_1(s) - B_0 s X_3(s) -\
frac{B_1 (alpha_1 +1) s}{2} big(e^{i phi} X_3(s-i alpha_1) + e^{-i phi} X_3(s+i alpha_1)big)+x_{30} (B_0 - B_1 sin phi)=0 tag{6}$$



Now, my question is:
How can I move forward from here? How can I handle $X_3(s pm i alpha_1)$ ifI want to solve for $X_3(s)$?










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    I want to solve the following equations for $x_1$, $x_2$, and $x_3$



    $$ K_0, x_1(t) + K_1, frac{dx_1(t)}{dt} + M_0, frac{dx_2(t)}{dt} + x_3(t) =A_0,sin (alpha_0 t) tag{1} $$



    $$ M_0, frac{dx_1(t)}{dt} + L_0,x_2(t) + K_1, frac{dx_2(t)}{dt}+L_1,int x_2(t), dt =0 tag{2} $$



    $$ x_1(t) -alpha_1,B_1,cos(alpha_1,t + phi) , x_3(t)- big[B_0+B_1,sin(alpha_1,t + phi) big] frac{dx_3(t)}{dt} =0 tag{3} $$



    Here is my try using Laplace transform:



    I can assume $x_1(0)=0$, and define $x_2(0)=x_{20}$, and $x_3(0)=x_{30}$



    $$(1) Rightarrow K_0, X_1(s) + K_1, sX_1(s)+ M_0, sX_2(s)+ X_3(s) + M_0, x_{20} = frac{A_0alpha_0}{s^2+alpha_0^2} tag{4} $$



    $$(2) Rightarrow M_0, X_1(s) + L_0, X_2(s) +K_1, sX_2(s)+ L_1, frac{X_2(s)}{s}+ X_3(s)+ K_1, x_{20} =0 tag{5} $$
    Next step brings me the trouble. I cannot simply take the Laplace transform of (3)



    Update 1 (as suggested by @Cesareo)



    Using the Euler's expansion of sine and cosine (3) can be transformed to



    $$ X_1(s) - B_0 s X_3(s) -\
    frac{B_1 (alpha_1 +1) s}{2} big(e^{i phi} X_3(s-i alpha_1) + e^{-i phi} X_3(s+i alpha_1)big)+x_{30} (B_0 - B_1 sin phi)=0 tag{6}$$



    Now, my question is:
    How can I move forward from here? How can I handle $X_3(s pm i alpha_1)$ ifI want to solve for $X_3(s)$?










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      I want to solve the following equations for $x_1$, $x_2$, and $x_3$



      $$ K_0, x_1(t) + K_1, frac{dx_1(t)}{dt} + M_0, frac{dx_2(t)}{dt} + x_3(t) =A_0,sin (alpha_0 t) tag{1} $$



      $$ M_0, frac{dx_1(t)}{dt} + L_0,x_2(t) + K_1, frac{dx_2(t)}{dt}+L_1,int x_2(t), dt =0 tag{2} $$



      $$ x_1(t) -alpha_1,B_1,cos(alpha_1,t + phi) , x_3(t)- big[B_0+B_1,sin(alpha_1,t + phi) big] frac{dx_3(t)}{dt} =0 tag{3} $$



      Here is my try using Laplace transform:



      I can assume $x_1(0)=0$, and define $x_2(0)=x_{20}$, and $x_3(0)=x_{30}$



      $$(1) Rightarrow K_0, X_1(s) + K_1, sX_1(s)+ M_0, sX_2(s)+ X_3(s) + M_0, x_{20} = frac{A_0alpha_0}{s^2+alpha_0^2} tag{4} $$



      $$(2) Rightarrow M_0, X_1(s) + L_0, X_2(s) +K_1, sX_2(s)+ L_1, frac{X_2(s)}{s}+ X_3(s)+ K_1, x_{20} =0 tag{5} $$
      Next step brings me the trouble. I cannot simply take the Laplace transform of (3)



      Update 1 (as suggested by @Cesareo)



      Using the Euler's expansion of sine and cosine (3) can be transformed to



      $$ X_1(s) - B_0 s X_3(s) -\
      frac{B_1 (alpha_1 +1) s}{2} big(e^{i phi} X_3(s-i alpha_1) + e^{-i phi} X_3(s+i alpha_1)big)+x_{30} (B_0 - B_1 sin phi)=0 tag{6}$$



      Now, my question is:
      How can I move forward from here? How can I handle $X_3(s pm i alpha_1)$ ifI want to solve for $X_3(s)$?










      share|cite|improve this question















      I want to solve the following equations for $x_1$, $x_2$, and $x_3$



      $$ K_0, x_1(t) + K_1, frac{dx_1(t)}{dt} + M_0, frac{dx_2(t)}{dt} + x_3(t) =A_0,sin (alpha_0 t) tag{1} $$



      $$ M_0, frac{dx_1(t)}{dt} + L_0,x_2(t) + K_1, frac{dx_2(t)}{dt}+L_1,int x_2(t), dt =0 tag{2} $$



      $$ x_1(t) -alpha_1,B_1,cos(alpha_1,t + phi) , x_3(t)- big[B_0+B_1,sin(alpha_1,t + phi) big] frac{dx_3(t)}{dt} =0 tag{3} $$



      Here is my try using Laplace transform:



      I can assume $x_1(0)=0$, and define $x_2(0)=x_{20}$, and $x_3(0)=x_{30}$



      $$(1) Rightarrow K_0, X_1(s) + K_1, sX_1(s)+ M_0, sX_2(s)+ X_3(s) + M_0, x_{20} = frac{A_0alpha_0}{s^2+alpha_0^2} tag{4} $$



      $$(2) Rightarrow M_0, X_1(s) + L_0, X_2(s) +K_1, sX_2(s)+ L_1, frac{X_2(s)}{s}+ X_3(s)+ K_1, x_{20} =0 tag{5} $$
      Next step brings me the trouble. I cannot simply take the Laplace transform of (3)



      Update 1 (as suggested by @Cesareo)



      Using the Euler's expansion of sine and cosine (3) can be transformed to



      $$ X_1(s) - B_0 s X_3(s) -\
      frac{B_1 (alpha_1 +1) s}{2} big(e^{i phi} X_3(s-i alpha_1) + e^{-i phi} X_3(s+i alpha_1)big)+x_{30} (B_0 - B_1 sin phi)=0 tag{6}$$



      Now, my question is:
      How can I move forward from here? How can I handle $X_3(s pm i alpha_1)$ ifI want to solve for $X_3(s)$?







      differential-equations






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 20 at 20:18

























      asked Nov 19 at 20:47









      Pojj

      54




      54






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          Hint.



          $$
          mathcal{L}(cos(alpha t)x(t)) = mathcal{L}(frac 12(e^{ialpha t}+e^{-ialpha t})x(t))
          $$



          and



          $$
          int_0^{infty}e^{ialpha t}x(t)e^{-s}dt = int_0^{infty}e^{-(s-ialpha)t}x(t) dt = X(s-ialpha)
          $$



          so after the Laplace transformation you should handle a system of difference equations ...






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thanks for the tip. I will try it and update here. isn't $mathcal{L} big(e^{i alpha t} x(t) big) = X(s-i alpha) $?
            – Pojj
            Nov 20 at 19:10












          • @Pojj You are right. I had a little imagination left.
            – Cesareo
            Nov 21 at 1:40










          • any suggestion how I can move forward from here? (Edited the question)
            – Pojj
            Nov 21 at 18:43










          • @Pojj In the same line, eliminating $X_1(s), X_2(s)$ we arrive to a quasi polynomial equation for $X_3(s)$ with the structure $$ f_1(s)X_3(s)+f_2(s)left(e^{iphi}X_3(s-ialpha_1)+e^{-iphi}X_3(s+ialpha_1)right)= C_0 $$ with $f_1(s),f_2(s)$ polynomial fractions ...
            – Cesareo
            Nov 22 at 1:37













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005508%2fhow-to-solve-these-simultaneous-differential-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          Hint.



          $$
          mathcal{L}(cos(alpha t)x(t)) = mathcal{L}(frac 12(e^{ialpha t}+e^{-ialpha t})x(t))
          $$



          and



          $$
          int_0^{infty}e^{ialpha t}x(t)e^{-s}dt = int_0^{infty}e^{-(s-ialpha)t}x(t) dt = X(s-ialpha)
          $$



          so after the Laplace transformation you should handle a system of difference equations ...






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thanks for the tip. I will try it and update here. isn't $mathcal{L} big(e^{i alpha t} x(t) big) = X(s-i alpha) $?
            – Pojj
            Nov 20 at 19:10












          • @Pojj You are right. I had a little imagination left.
            – Cesareo
            Nov 21 at 1:40










          • any suggestion how I can move forward from here? (Edited the question)
            – Pojj
            Nov 21 at 18:43










          • @Pojj In the same line, eliminating $X_1(s), X_2(s)$ we arrive to a quasi polynomial equation for $X_3(s)$ with the structure $$ f_1(s)X_3(s)+f_2(s)left(e^{iphi}X_3(s-ialpha_1)+e^{-iphi}X_3(s+ialpha_1)right)= C_0 $$ with $f_1(s),f_2(s)$ polynomial fractions ...
            – Cesareo
            Nov 22 at 1:37

















          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          Hint.



          $$
          mathcal{L}(cos(alpha t)x(t)) = mathcal{L}(frac 12(e^{ialpha t}+e^{-ialpha t})x(t))
          $$



          and



          $$
          int_0^{infty}e^{ialpha t}x(t)e^{-s}dt = int_0^{infty}e^{-(s-ialpha)t}x(t) dt = X(s-ialpha)
          $$



          so after the Laplace transformation you should handle a system of difference equations ...






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thanks for the tip. I will try it and update here. isn't $mathcal{L} big(e^{i alpha t} x(t) big) = X(s-i alpha) $?
            – Pojj
            Nov 20 at 19:10












          • @Pojj You are right. I had a little imagination left.
            – Cesareo
            Nov 21 at 1:40










          • any suggestion how I can move forward from here? (Edited the question)
            – Pojj
            Nov 21 at 18:43










          • @Pojj In the same line, eliminating $X_1(s), X_2(s)$ we arrive to a quasi polynomial equation for $X_3(s)$ with the structure $$ f_1(s)X_3(s)+f_2(s)left(e^{iphi}X_3(s-ialpha_1)+e^{-iphi}X_3(s+ialpha_1)right)= C_0 $$ with $f_1(s),f_2(s)$ polynomial fractions ...
            – Cesareo
            Nov 22 at 1:37















          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted






          Hint.



          $$
          mathcal{L}(cos(alpha t)x(t)) = mathcal{L}(frac 12(e^{ialpha t}+e^{-ialpha t})x(t))
          $$



          and



          $$
          int_0^{infty}e^{ialpha t}x(t)e^{-s}dt = int_0^{infty}e^{-(s-ialpha)t}x(t) dt = X(s-ialpha)
          $$



          so after the Laplace transformation you should handle a system of difference equations ...






          share|cite|improve this answer














          Hint.



          $$
          mathcal{L}(cos(alpha t)x(t)) = mathcal{L}(frac 12(e^{ialpha t}+e^{-ialpha t})x(t))
          $$



          and



          $$
          int_0^{infty}e^{ialpha t}x(t)e^{-s}dt = int_0^{infty}e^{-(s-ialpha)t}x(t) dt = X(s-ialpha)
          $$



          so after the Laplace transformation you should handle a system of difference equations ...







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Nov 21 at 1:41

























          answered Nov 19 at 21:48









          Cesareo

          7,4303416




          7,4303416












          • Thanks for the tip. I will try it and update here. isn't $mathcal{L} big(e^{i alpha t} x(t) big) = X(s-i alpha) $?
            – Pojj
            Nov 20 at 19:10












          • @Pojj You are right. I had a little imagination left.
            – Cesareo
            Nov 21 at 1:40










          • any suggestion how I can move forward from here? (Edited the question)
            – Pojj
            Nov 21 at 18:43










          • @Pojj In the same line, eliminating $X_1(s), X_2(s)$ we arrive to a quasi polynomial equation for $X_3(s)$ with the structure $$ f_1(s)X_3(s)+f_2(s)left(e^{iphi}X_3(s-ialpha_1)+e^{-iphi}X_3(s+ialpha_1)right)= C_0 $$ with $f_1(s),f_2(s)$ polynomial fractions ...
            – Cesareo
            Nov 22 at 1:37




















          • Thanks for the tip. I will try it and update here. isn't $mathcal{L} big(e^{i alpha t} x(t) big) = X(s-i alpha) $?
            – Pojj
            Nov 20 at 19:10












          • @Pojj You are right. I had a little imagination left.
            – Cesareo
            Nov 21 at 1:40










          • any suggestion how I can move forward from here? (Edited the question)
            – Pojj
            Nov 21 at 18:43










          • @Pojj In the same line, eliminating $X_1(s), X_2(s)$ we arrive to a quasi polynomial equation for $X_3(s)$ with the structure $$ f_1(s)X_3(s)+f_2(s)left(e^{iphi}X_3(s-ialpha_1)+e^{-iphi}X_3(s+ialpha_1)right)= C_0 $$ with $f_1(s),f_2(s)$ polynomial fractions ...
            – Cesareo
            Nov 22 at 1:37


















          Thanks for the tip. I will try it and update here. isn't $mathcal{L} big(e^{i alpha t} x(t) big) = X(s-i alpha) $?
          – Pojj
          Nov 20 at 19:10






          Thanks for the tip. I will try it and update here. isn't $mathcal{L} big(e^{i alpha t} x(t) big) = X(s-i alpha) $?
          – Pojj
          Nov 20 at 19:10














          @Pojj You are right. I had a little imagination left.
          – Cesareo
          Nov 21 at 1:40




          @Pojj You are right. I had a little imagination left.
          – Cesareo
          Nov 21 at 1:40












          any suggestion how I can move forward from here? (Edited the question)
          – Pojj
          Nov 21 at 18:43




          any suggestion how I can move forward from here? (Edited the question)
          – Pojj
          Nov 21 at 18:43












          @Pojj In the same line, eliminating $X_1(s), X_2(s)$ we arrive to a quasi polynomial equation for $X_3(s)$ with the structure $$ f_1(s)X_3(s)+f_2(s)left(e^{iphi}X_3(s-ialpha_1)+e^{-iphi}X_3(s+ialpha_1)right)= C_0 $$ with $f_1(s),f_2(s)$ polynomial fractions ...
          – Cesareo
          Nov 22 at 1:37






          @Pojj In the same line, eliminating $X_1(s), X_2(s)$ we arrive to a quasi polynomial equation for $X_3(s)$ with the structure $$ f_1(s)X_3(s)+f_2(s)left(e^{iphi}X_3(s-ialpha_1)+e^{-iphi}X_3(s+ialpha_1)right)= C_0 $$ with $f_1(s),f_2(s)$ polynomial fractions ...
          – Cesareo
          Nov 22 at 1:37




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005508%2fhow-to-solve-these-simultaneous-differential-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Index of /

          Tribalistas

          Listed building