How to solve these simultaneous differential equations
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I want to solve the following equations for $x_1$, $x_2$, and $x_3$
$$ K_0, x_1(t) + K_1, frac{dx_1(t)}{dt} + M_0, frac{dx_2(t)}{dt} + x_3(t) =A_0,sin (alpha_0 t) tag{1} $$
$$ M_0, frac{dx_1(t)}{dt} + L_0,x_2(t) + K_1, frac{dx_2(t)}{dt}+L_1,int x_2(t), dt =0 tag{2} $$
$$ x_1(t) -alpha_1,B_1,cos(alpha_1,t + phi) , x_3(t)- big[B_0+B_1,sin(alpha_1,t + phi) big] frac{dx_3(t)}{dt} =0 tag{3} $$
Here is my try using Laplace transform:
I can assume $x_1(0)=0$, and define $x_2(0)=x_{20}$, and $x_3(0)=x_{30}$
$$(1) Rightarrow K_0, X_1(s) + K_1, sX_1(s)+ M_0, sX_2(s)+ X_3(s) + M_0, x_{20} = frac{A_0alpha_0}{s^2+alpha_0^2} tag{4} $$
$$(2) Rightarrow M_0, X_1(s) + L_0, X_2(s) +K_1, sX_2(s)+ L_1, frac{X_2(s)}{s}+ X_3(s)+ K_1, x_{20} =0 tag{5} $$
Next step brings me the trouble. I cannot simply take the Laplace transform of (3)
Update 1 (as suggested by @Cesareo)
Using the Euler's expansion of sine and cosine (3) can be transformed to
$$ X_1(s) - B_0 s X_3(s) -\
frac{B_1 (alpha_1 +1) s}{2} big(e^{i phi} X_3(s-i alpha_1) + e^{-i phi} X_3(s+i alpha_1)big)+x_{30} (B_0 - B_1 sin phi)=0 tag{6}$$
Now, my question is:
How can I move forward from here? How can I handle $X_3(s pm i alpha_1)$ ifI want to solve for $X_3(s)$?
differential-equations
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I want to solve the following equations for $x_1$, $x_2$, and $x_3$
$$ K_0, x_1(t) + K_1, frac{dx_1(t)}{dt} + M_0, frac{dx_2(t)}{dt} + x_3(t) =A_0,sin (alpha_0 t) tag{1} $$
$$ M_0, frac{dx_1(t)}{dt} + L_0,x_2(t) + K_1, frac{dx_2(t)}{dt}+L_1,int x_2(t), dt =0 tag{2} $$
$$ x_1(t) -alpha_1,B_1,cos(alpha_1,t + phi) , x_3(t)- big[B_0+B_1,sin(alpha_1,t + phi) big] frac{dx_3(t)}{dt} =0 tag{3} $$
Here is my try using Laplace transform:
I can assume $x_1(0)=0$, and define $x_2(0)=x_{20}$, and $x_3(0)=x_{30}$
$$(1) Rightarrow K_0, X_1(s) + K_1, sX_1(s)+ M_0, sX_2(s)+ X_3(s) + M_0, x_{20} = frac{A_0alpha_0}{s^2+alpha_0^2} tag{4} $$
$$(2) Rightarrow M_0, X_1(s) + L_0, X_2(s) +K_1, sX_2(s)+ L_1, frac{X_2(s)}{s}+ X_3(s)+ K_1, x_{20} =0 tag{5} $$
Next step brings me the trouble. I cannot simply take the Laplace transform of (3)
Update 1 (as suggested by @Cesareo)
Using the Euler's expansion of sine and cosine (3) can be transformed to
$$ X_1(s) - B_0 s X_3(s) -\
frac{B_1 (alpha_1 +1) s}{2} big(e^{i phi} X_3(s-i alpha_1) + e^{-i phi} X_3(s+i alpha_1)big)+x_{30} (B_0 - B_1 sin phi)=0 tag{6}$$
Now, my question is:
How can I move forward from here? How can I handle $X_3(s pm i alpha_1)$ ifI want to solve for $X_3(s)$?
differential-equations
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I want to solve the following equations for $x_1$, $x_2$, and $x_3$
$$ K_0, x_1(t) + K_1, frac{dx_1(t)}{dt} + M_0, frac{dx_2(t)}{dt} + x_3(t) =A_0,sin (alpha_0 t) tag{1} $$
$$ M_0, frac{dx_1(t)}{dt} + L_0,x_2(t) + K_1, frac{dx_2(t)}{dt}+L_1,int x_2(t), dt =0 tag{2} $$
$$ x_1(t) -alpha_1,B_1,cos(alpha_1,t + phi) , x_3(t)- big[B_0+B_1,sin(alpha_1,t + phi) big] frac{dx_3(t)}{dt} =0 tag{3} $$
Here is my try using Laplace transform:
I can assume $x_1(0)=0$, and define $x_2(0)=x_{20}$, and $x_3(0)=x_{30}$
$$(1) Rightarrow K_0, X_1(s) + K_1, sX_1(s)+ M_0, sX_2(s)+ X_3(s) + M_0, x_{20} = frac{A_0alpha_0}{s^2+alpha_0^2} tag{4} $$
$$(2) Rightarrow M_0, X_1(s) + L_0, X_2(s) +K_1, sX_2(s)+ L_1, frac{X_2(s)}{s}+ X_3(s)+ K_1, x_{20} =0 tag{5} $$
Next step brings me the trouble. I cannot simply take the Laplace transform of (3)
Update 1 (as suggested by @Cesareo)
Using the Euler's expansion of sine and cosine (3) can be transformed to
$$ X_1(s) - B_0 s X_3(s) -\
frac{B_1 (alpha_1 +1) s}{2} big(e^{i phi} X_3(s-i alpha_1) + e^{-i phi} X_3(s+i alpha_1)big)+x_{30} (B_0 - B_1 sin phi)=0 tag{6}$$
Now, my question is:
How can I move forward from here? How can I handle $X_3(s pm i alpha_1)$ ifI want to solve for $X_3(s)$?
differential-equations
I want to solve the following equations for $x_1$, $x_2$, and $x_3$
$$ K_0, x_1(t) + K_1, frac{dx_1(t)}{dt} + M_0, frac{dx_2(t)}{dt} + x_3(t) =A_0,sin (alpha_0 t) tag{1} $$
$$ M_0, frac{dx_1(t)}{dt} + L_0,x_2(t) + K_1, frac{dx_2(t)}{dt}+L_1,int x_2(t), dt =0 tag{2} $$
$$ x_1(t) -alpha_1,B_1,cos(alpha_1,t + phi) , x_3(t)- big[B_0+B_1,sin(alpha_1,t + phi) big] frac{dx_3(t)}{dt} =0 tag{3} $$
Here is my try using Laplace transform:
I can assume $x_1(0)=0$, and define $x_2(0)=x_{20}$, and $x_3(0)=x_{30}$
$$(1) Rightarrow K_0, X_1(s) + K_1, sX_1(s)+ M_0, sX_2(s)+ X_3(s) + M_0, x_{20} = frac{A_0alpha_0}{s^2+alpha_0^2} tag{4} $$
$$(2) Rightarrow M_0, X_1(s) + L_0, X_2(s) +K_1, sX_2(s)+ L_1, frac{X_2(s)}{s}+ X_3(s)+ K_1, x_{20} =0 tag{5} $$
Next step brings me the trouble. I cannot simply take the Laplace transform of (3)
Update 1 (as suggested by @Cesareo)
Using the Euler's expansion of sine and cosine (3) can be transformed to
$$ X_1(s) - B_0 s X_3(s) -\
frac{B_1 (alpha_1 +1) s}{2} big(e^{i phi} X_3(s-i alpha_1) + e^{-i phi} X_3(s+i alpha_1)big)+x_{30} (B_0 - B_1 sin phi)=0 tag{6}$$
Now, my question is:
How can I move forward from here? How can I handle $X_3(s pm i alpha_1)$ ifI want to solve for $X_3(s)$?
differential-equations
differential-equations
edited Nov 20 at 20:18
asked Nov 19 at 20:47
Pojj
54
54
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
Hint.
$$
mathcal{L}(cos(alpha t)x(t)) = mathcal{L}(frac 12(e^{ialpha t}+e^{-ialpha t})x(t))
$$
and
$$
int_0^{infty}e^{ialpha t}x(t)e^{-s}dt = int_0^{infty}e^{-(s-ialpha)t}x(t) dt = X(s-ialpha)
$$
so after the Laplace transformation you should handle a system of difference equations ...
Thanks for the tip. I will try it and update here. isn't $mathcal{L} big(e^{i alpha t} x(t) big) = X(s-i alpha) $?
– Pojj
Nov 20 at 19:10
@Pojj You are right. I had a little imagination left.
– Cesareo
Nov 21 at 1:40
any suggestion how I can move forward from here? (Edited the question)
– Pojj
Nov 21 at 18:43
@Pojj In the same line, eliminating $X_1(s), X_2(s)$ we arrive to a quasi polynomial equation for $X_3(s)$ with the structure $$ f_1(s)X_3(s)+f_2(s)left(e^{iphi}X_3(s-ialpha_1)+e^{-iphi}X_3(s+ialpha_1)right)= C_0 $$ with $f_1(s),f_2(s)$ polynomial fractions ...
– Cesareo
Nov 22 at 1:37
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
Hint.
$$
mathcal{L}(cos(alpha t)x(t)) = mathcal{L}(frac 12(e^{ialpha t}+e^{-ialpha t})x(t))
$$
and
$$
int_0^{infty}e^{ialpha t}x(t)e^{-s}dt = int_0^{infty}e^{-(s-ialpha)t}x(t) dt = X(s-ialpha)
$$
so after the Laplace transformation you should handle a system of difference equations ...
Thanks for the tip. I will try it and update here. isn't $mathcal{L} big(e^{i alpha t} x(t) big) = X(s-i alpha) $?
– Pojj
Nov 20 at 19:10
@Pojj You are right. I had a little imagination left.
– Cesareo
Nov 21 at 1:40
any suggestion how I can move forward from here? (Edited the question)
– Pojj
Nov 21 at 18:43
@Pojj In the same line, eliminating $X_1(s), X_2(s)$ we arrive to a quasi polynomial equation for $X_3(s)$ with the structure $$ f_1(s)X_3(s)+f_2(s)left(e^{iphi}X_3(s-ialpha_1)+e^{-iphi}X_3(s+ialpha_1)right)= C_0 $$ with $f_1(s),f_2(s)$ polynomial fractions ...
– Cesareo
Nov 22 at 1:37
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
Hint.
$$
mathcal{L}(cos(alpha t)x(t)) = mathcal{L}(frac 12(e^{ialpha t}+e^{-ialpha t})x(t))
$$
and
$$
int_0^{infty}e^{ialpha t}x(t)e^{-s}dt = int_0^{infty}e^{-(s-ialpha)t}x(t) dt = X(s-ialpha)
$$
so after the Laplace transformation you should handle a system of difference equations ...
Thanks for the tip. I will try it and update here. isn't $mathcal{L} big(e^{i alpha t} x(t) big) = X(s-i alpha) $?
– Pojj
Nov 20 at 19:10
@Pojj You are right. I had a little imagination left.
– Cesareo
Nov 21 at 1:40
any suggestion how I can move forward from here? (Edited the question)
– Pojj
Nov 21 at 18:43
@Pojj In the same line, eliminating $X_1(s), X_2(s)$ we arrive to a quasi polynomial equation for $X_3(s)$ with the structure $$ f_1(s)X_3(s)+f_2(s)left(e^{iphi}X_3(s-ialpha_1)+e^{-iphi}X_3(s+ialpha_1)right)= C_0 $$ with $f_1(s),f_2(s)$ polynomial fractions ...
– Cesareo
Nov 22 at 1:37
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
Hint.
$$
mathcal{L}(cos(alpha t)x(t)) = mathcal{L}(frac 12(e^{ialpha t}+e^{-ialpha t})x(t))
$$
and
$$
int_0^{infty}e^{ialpha t}x(t)e^{-s}dt = int_0^{infty}e^{-(s-ialpha)t}x(t) dt = X(s-ialpha)
$$
so after the Laplace transformation you should handle a system of difference equations ...
Hint.
$$
mathcal{L}(cos(alpha t)x(t)) = mathcal{L}(frac 12(e^{ialpha t}+e^{-ialpha t})x(t))
$$
and
$$
int_0^{infty}e^{ialpha t}x(t)e^{-s}dt = int_0^{infty}e^{-(s-ialpha)t}x(t) dt = X(s-ialpha)
$$
so after the Laplace transformation you should handle a system of difference equations ...
edited Nov 21 at 1:41
answered Nov 19 at 21:48
Cesareo
7,4303416
7,4303416
Thanks for the tip. I will try it and update here. isn't $mathcal{L} big(e^{i alpha t} x(t) big) = X(s-i alpha) $?
– Pojj
Nov 20 at 19:10
@Pojj You are right. I had a little imagination left.
– Cesareo
Nov 21 at 1:40
any suggestion how I can move forward from here? (Edited the question)
– Pojj
Nov 21 at 18:43
@Pojj In the same line, eliminating $X_1(s), X_2(s)$ we arrive to a quasi polynomial equation for $X_3(s)$ with the structure $$ f_1(s)X_3(s)+f_2(s)left(e^{iphi}X_3(s-ialpha_1)+e^{-iphi}X_3(s+ialpha_1)right)= C_0 $$ with $f_1(s),f_2(s)$ polynomial fractions ...
– Cesareo
Nov 22 at 1:37
add a comment |
Thanks for the tip. I will try it and update here. isn't $mathcal{L} big(e^{i alpha t} x(t) big) = X(s-i alpha) $?
– Pojj
Nov 20 at 19:10
@Pojj You are right. I had a little imagination left.
– Cesareo
Nov 21 at 1:40
any suggestion how I can move forward from here? (Edited the question)
– Pojj
Nov 21 at 18:43
@Pojj In the same line, eliminating $X_1(s), X_2(s)$ we arrive to a quasi polynomial equation for $X_3(s)$ with the structure $$ f_1(s)X_3(s)+f_2(s)left(e^{iphi}X_3(s-ialpha_1)+e^{-iphi}X_3(s+ialpha_1)right)= C_0 $$ with $f_1(s),f_2(s)$ polynomial fractions ...
– Cesareo
Nov 22 at 1:37
Thanks for the tip. I will try it and update here. isn't $mathcal{L} big(e^{i alpha t} x(t) big) = X(s-i alpha) $?
– Pojj
Nov 20 at 19:10
Thanks for the tip. I will try it and update here. isn't $mathcal{L} big(e^{i alpha t} x(t) big) = X(s-i alpha) $?
– Pojj
Nov 20 at 19:10
@Pojj You are right. I had a little imagination left.
– Cesareo
Nov 21 at 1:40
@Pojj You are right. I had a little imagination left.
– Cesareo
Nov 21 at 1:40
any suggestion how I can move forward from here? (Edited the question)
– Pojj
Nov 21 at 18:43
any suggestion how I can move forward from here? (Edited the question)
– Pojj
Nov 21 at 18:43
@Pojj In the same line, eliminating $X_1(s), X_2(s)$ we arrive to a quasi polynomial equation for $X_3(s)$ with the structure $$ f_1(s)X_3(s)+f_2(s)left(e^{iphi}X_3(s-ialpha_1)+e^{-iphi}X_3(s+ialpha_1)right)= C_0 $$ with $f_1(s),f_2(s)$ polynomial fractions ...
– Cesareo
Nov 22 at 1:37
@Pojj In the same line, eliminating $X_1(s), X_2(s)$ we arrive to a quasi polynomial equation for $X_3(s)$ with the structure $$ f_1(s)X_3(s)+f_2(s)left(e^{iphi}X_3(s-ialpha_1)+e^{-iphi}X_3(s+ialpha_1)right)= C_0 $$ with $f_1(s),f_2(s)$ polynomial fractions ...
– Cesareo
Nov 22 at 1:37
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005508%2fhow-to-solve-these-simultaneous-differential-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown