Giving a proof to the weak compactness of the unity ball in a reflexive normed space











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












So, I am trying to prove that if $X$ is a normed and reflexive space, its unity ball, that is $B$=$lbrace xin X : parallel xparallel =1rbrace$, is weakly compact.



For that matter, I have already proven that:




  1. $J:X longrightarrow X''$ the natural embedding is continuous provided that $X$ has the $tau_{d}$ topology (that is, the initial topology of $X'$) and $X''$ with $tau_{d}^{''}*$


  2. If $X$ is reflexive, $J$ is an homeomorphism (with respect the previous topologies).



My idea is to use Alaoglu-Bourbaki's theorem,which stablishes that the unity ball in $X'$ is weakly* compact, and use that the image of a compact is a compact through a continuous function.



Therefore, my problem is: if $B$=$lbrace xin X : parallel xparallel =1rbrace$ is a subset of $X'$, how do I relate it? I mean, I just do not know how to finish the argument, which I feel to be very close to me.



Also, I have checked Using the Banach-Alaoglu Theorem to show that if $X$ is reflexive then $B_X$ is weakly compact. but I think it uses the algebraic dual, or I just don't fully understand his proof.



Thank you in advance.










share|cite|improve this question






















  • This is a theorem of Kakutani, proved in the answer. I have not seen a proof that does not use dual spaces.
    – Matematleta
    Nov 19 at 21:48















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












So, I am trying to prove that if $X$ is a normed and reflexive space, its unity ball, that is $B$=$lbrace xin X : parallel xparallel =1rbrace$, is weakly compact.



For that matter, I have already proven that:




  1. $J:X longrightarrow X''$ the natural embedding is continuous provided that $X$ has the $tau_{d}$ topology (that is, the initial topology of $X'$) and $X''$ with $tau_{d}^{''}*$


  2. If $X$ is reflexive, $J$ is an homeomorphism (with respect the previous topologies).



My idea is to use Alaoglu-Bourbaki's theorem,which stablishes that the unity ball in $X'$ is weakly* compact, and use that the image of a compact is a compact through a continuous function.



Therefore, my problem is: if $B$=$lbrace xin X : parallel xparallel =1rbrace$ is a subset of $X'$, how do I relate it? I mean, I just do not know how to finish the argument, which I feel to be very close to me.



Also, I have checked Using the Banach-Alaoglu Theorem to show that if $X$ is reflexive then $B_X$ is weakly compact. but I think it uses the algebraic dual, or I just don't fully understand his proof.



Thank you in advance.










share|cite|improve this question






















  • This is a theorem of Kakutani, proved in the answer. I have not seen a proof that does not use dual spaces.
    – Matematleta
    Nov 19 at 21:48













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











So, I am trying to prove that if $X$ is a normed and reflexive space, its unity ball, that is $B$=$lbrace xin X : parallel xparallel =1rbrace$, is weakly compact.



For that matter, I have already proven that:




  1. $J:X longrightarrow X''$ the natural embedding is continuous provided that $X$ has the $tau_{d}$ topology (that is, the initial topology of $X'$) and $X''$ with $tau_{d}^{''}*$


  2. If $X$ is reflexive, $J$ is an homeomorphism (with respect the previous topologies).



My idea is to use Alaoglu-Bourbaki's theorem,which stablishes that the unity ball in $X'$ is weakly* compact, and use that the image of a compact is a compact through a continuous function.



Therefore, my problem is: if $B$=$lbrace xin X : parallel xparallel =1rbrace$ is a subset of $X'$, how do I relate it? I mean, I just do not know how to finish the argument, which I feel to be very close to me.



Also, I have checked Using the Banach-Alaoglu Theorem to show that if $X$ is reflexive then $B_X$ is weakly compact. but I think it uses the algebraic dual, or I just don't fully understand his proof.



Thank you in advance.










share|cite|improve this question













So, I am trying to prove that if $X$ is a normed and reflexive space, its unity ball, that is $B$=$lbrace xin X : parallel xparallel =1rbrace$, is weakly compact.



For that matter, I have already proven that:




  1. $J:X longrightarrow X''$ the natural embedding is continuous provided that $X$ has the $tau_{d}$ topology (that is, the initial topology of $X'$) and $X''$ with $tau_{d}^{''}*$


  2. If $X$ is reflexive, $J$ is an homeomorphism (with respect the previous topologies).



My idea is to use Alaoglu-Bourbaki's theorem,which stablishes that the unity ball in $X'$ is weakly* compact, and use that the image of a compact is a compact through a continuous function.



Therefore, my problem is: if $B$=$lbrace xin X : parallel xparallel =1rbrace$ is a subset of $X'$, how do I relate it? I mean, I just do not know how to finish the argument, which I feel to be very close to me.



Also, I have checked Using the Banach-Alaoglu Theorem to show that if $X$ is reflexive then $B_X$ is weakly compact. but I think it uses the algebraic dual, or I just don't fully understand his proof.



Thank you in advance.







general-topology functional-analysis normed-spaces reflexive-space






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 19 at 20:45









Juan Zaragoza Chichell

11




11












  • This is a theorem of Kakutani, proved in the answer. I have not seen a proof that does not use dual spaces.
    – Matematleta
    Nov 19 at 21:48


















  • This is a theorem of Kakutani, proved in the answer. I have not seen a proof that does not use dual spaces.
    – Matematleta
    Nov 19 at 21:48
















This is a theorem of Kakutani, proved in the answer. I have not seen a proof that does not use dual spaces.
– Matematleta
Nov 19 at 21:48




This is a theorem of Kakutani, proved in the answer. I have not seen a proof that does not use dual spaces.
– Matematleta
Nov 19 at 21:48










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













Here is a rather detailed proof.



If $X$ is reflexive, the natural embedding $J:Xto X''$
is an isometric isomorphism. In particular, the weak topology on $X$, that is, the topology $sigma(X,X')$, is identical to the weak topology on $X''$, that is, the topology $sigma(X'',X''')$. Let $B_X$ denote the unit ball of $X$. Then $J(B_X)$ is the unit ball of $X''$. By Alaoglu's theorem (Bourbaki had nothing to do with it), the unit ball of $X''$ is compact in the $sigma(X'',I(X'))$ topology, where $I$ is the natural embedding of $X'$ into $X'''$. But $I:X'to X'''$ is an injective isometry, so if a set is compact in the $sigma(X'',I(X'))$ topology then clearly it is also compact in the larger topology $sigma(X'',X''')$. Therefore, the unit ball of $X''$ is compact in the $sigma(X'',X''')$ topology, and therefore its inverse image under the homomorphism $J$, namely, $B_X$, is compact in the weak topology of $X$.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • I am sorry for asking this, but I'm definitely not proficient in topology or functional analysis: why is the weak topology on $X$ identical to the weak topology on $X''$ provided J is an homeomorphism? Also, where do you use the weak* topology? That last thing might be a notation issue.
    – Juan Zaragoza Chichell
    Nov 20 at 18:33











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005500%2fgiving-a-proof-to-the-weak-compactness-of-the-unity-ball-in-a-reflexive-normed-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote













Here is a rather detailed proof.



If $X$ is reflexive, the natural embedding $J:Xto X''$
is an isometric isomorphism. In particular, the weak topology on $X$, that is, the topology $sigma(X,X')$, is identical to the weak topology on $X''$, that is, the topology $sigma(X'',X''')$. Let $B_X$ denote the unit ball of $X$. Then $J(B_X)$ is the unit ball of $X''$. By Alaoglu's theorem (Bourbaki had nothing to do with it), the unit ball of $X''$ is compact in the $sigma(X'',I(X'))$ topology, where $I$ is the natural embedding of $X'$ into $X'''$. But $I:X'to X'''$ is an injective isometry, so if a set is compact in the $sigma(X'',I(X'))$ topology then clearly it is also compact in the larger topology $sigma(X'',X''')$. Therefore, the unit ball of $X''$ is compact in the $sigma(X'',X''')$ topology, and therefore its inverse image under the homomorphism $J$, namely, $B_X$, is compact in the weak topology of $X$.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • I am sorry for asking this, but I'm definitely not proficient in topology or functional analysis: why is the weak topology on $X$ identical to the weak topology on $X''$ provided J is an homeomorphism? Also, where do you use the weak* topology? That last thing might be a notation issue.
    – Juan Zaragoza Chichell
    Nov 20 at 18:33















up vote
1
down vote













Here is a rather detailed proof.



If $X$ is reflexive, the natural embedding $J:Xto X''$
is an isometric isomorphism. In particular, the weak topology on $X$, that is, the topology $sigma(X,X')$, is identical to the weak topology on $X''$, that is, the topology $sigma(X'',X''')$. Let $B_X$ denote the unit ball of $X$. Then $J(B_X)$ is the unit ball of $X''$. By Alaoglu's theorem (Bourbaki had nothing to do with it), the unit ball of $X''$ is compact in the $sigma(X'',I(X'))$ topology, where $I$ is the natural embedding of $X'$ into $X'''$. But $I:X'to X'''$ is an injective isometry, so if a set is compact in the $sigma(X'',I(X'))$ topology then clearly it is also compact in the larger topology $sigma(X'',X''')$. Therefore, the unit ball of $X''$ is compact in the $sigma(X'',X''')$ topology, and therefore its inverse image under the homomorphism $J$, namely, $B_X$, is compact in the weak topology of $X$.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • I am sorry for asking this, but I'm definitely not proficient in topology or functional analysis: why is the weak topology on $X$ identical to the weak topology on $X''$ provided J is an homeomorphism? Also, where do you use the weak* topology? That last thing might be a notation issue.
    – Juan Zaragoza Chichell
    Nov 20 at 18:33













up vote
1
down vote










up vote
1
down vote









Here is a rather detailed proof.



If $X$ is reflexive, the natural embedding $J:Xto X''$
is an isometric isomorphism. In particular, the weak topology on $X$, that is, the topology $sigma(X,X')$, is identical to the weak topology on $X''$, that is, the topology $sigma(X'',X''')$. Let $B_X$ denote the unit ball of $X$. Then $J(B_X)$ is the unit ball of $X''$. By Alaoglu's theorem (Bourbaki had nothing to do with it), the unit ball of $X''$ is compact in the $sigma(X'',I(X'))$ topology, where $I$ is the natural embedding of $X'$ into $X'''$. But $I:X'to X'''$ is an injective isometry, so if a set is compact in the $sigma(X'',I(X'))$ topology then clearly it is also compact in the larger topology $sigma(X'',X''')$. Therefore, the unit ball of $X''$ is compact in the $sigma(X'',X''')$ topology, and therefore its inverse image under the homomorphism $J$, namely, $B_X$, is compact in the weak topology of $X$.






share|cite|improve this answer














Here is a rather detailed proof.



If $X$ is reflexive, the natural embedding $J:Xto X''$
is an isometric isomorphism. In particular, the weak topology on $X$, that is, the topology $sigma(X,X')$, is identical to the weak topology on $X''$, that is, the topology $sigma(X'',X''')$. Let $B_X$ denote the unit ball of $X$. Then $J(B_X)$ is the unit ball of $X''$. By Alaoglu's theorem (Bourbaki had nothing to do with it), the unit ball of $X''$ is compact in the $sigma(X'',I(X'))$ topology, where $I$ is the natural embedding of $X'$ into $X'''$. But $I:X'to X'''$ is an injective isometry, so if a set is compact in the $sigma(X'',I(X'))$ topology then clearly it is also compact in the larger topology $sigma(X'',X''')$. Therefore, the unit ball of $X''$ is compact in the $sigma(X'',X''')$ topology, and therefore its inverse image under the homomorphism $J$, namely, $B_X$, is compact in the weak topology of $X$.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Nov 19 at 21:46

























answered Nov 19 at 21:31









uniquesolution

8,631823




8,631823












  • I am sorry for asking this, but I'm definitely not proficient in topology or functional analysis: why is the weak topology on $X$ identical to the weak topology on $X''$ provided J is an homeomorphism? Also, where do you use the weak* topology? That last thing might be a notation issue.
    – Juan Zaragoza Chichell
    Nov 20 at 18:33


















  • I am sorry for asking this, but I'm definitely not proficient in topology or functional analysis: why is the weak topology on $X$ identical to the weak topology on $X''$ provided J is an homeomorphism? Also, where do you use the weak* topology? That last thing might be a notation issue.
    – Juan Zaragoza Chichell
    Nov 20 at 18:33
















I am sorry for asking this, but I'm definitely not proficient in topology or functional analysis: why is the weak topology on $X$ identical to the weak topology on $X''$ provided J is an homeomorphism? Also, where do you use the weak* topology? That last thing might be a notation issue.
– Juan Zaragoza Chichell
Nov 20 at 18:33




I am sorry for asking this, but I'm definitely not proficient in topology or functional analysis: why is the weak topology on $X$ identical to the weak topology on $X''$ provided J is an homeomorphism? Also, where do you use the weak* topology? That last thing might be a notation issue.
– Juan Zaragoza Chichell
Nov 20 at 18:33


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005500%2fgiving-a-proof-to-the-weak-compactness-of-the-unity-ball-in-a-reflexive-normed-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Index of /

Tribalistas

Listed building