if $ f(f(x))= x^2 + 1$ , then $ f(6)= $?











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I want to know how to solve this type of questions. How can I find $ f(x)$ from $ f(f(x))$



Suppose, $ f(f(x)) = x$ , then $ f(x)=x$ or $ f(x)=dfrac{(x+1)}{(x-1)}$

how to find these solutions..

I have found one.. $ f(6) = sqrt{222} $

Is this correct?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    There are infinitely many real-valued functions of a real variable such that $f(f(x)) = x$, not just the two you give.
    – Rob Arthan
    Jan 14 '16 at 17:29






  • 1




    The set of involutions is not made by just those functions, and $f(f(x))=x^2+1$ does not give enough information to find a unique value $f(6)$. Do you want to find all the possible values of $f(6)$, given $f(f(x))=x^2+1$?
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    Jan 14 '16 at 17:30










  • For large values of $x$, $f(f(x))approx x^2$, for which a solution is $f(x)=x^{sqrt2}$.
    – Yves Daoust
    Jan 14 '16 at 17:30












  • Related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3633/….
    – Martin R
    Jan 14 '16 at 17:39















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I want to know how to solve this type of questions. How can I find $ f(x)$ from $ f(f(x))$



Suppose, $ f(f(x)) = x$ , then $ f(x)=x$ or $ f(x)=dfrac{(x+1)}{(x-1)}$

how to find these solutions..

I have found one.. $ f(6) = sqrt{222} $

Is this correct?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    There are infinitely many real-valued functions of a real variable such that $f(f(x)) = x$, not just the two you give.
    – Rob Arthan
    Jan 14 '16 at 17:29






  • 1




    The set of involutions is not made by just those functions, and $f(f(x))=x^2+1$ does not give enough information to find a unique value $f(6)$. Do you want to find all the possible values of $f(6)$, given $f(f(x))=x^2+1$?
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    Jan 14 '16 at 17:30










  • For large values of $x$, $f(f(x))approx x^2$, for which a solution is $f(x)=x^{sqrt2}$.
    – Yves Daoust
    Jan 14 '16 at 17:30












  • Related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3633/….
    – Martin R
    Jan 14 '16 at 17:39













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











I want to know how to solve this type of questions. How can I find $ f(x)$ from $ f(f(x))$



Suppose, $ f(f(x)) = x$ , then $ f(x)=x$ or $ f(x)=dfrac{(x+1)}{(x-1)}$

how to find these solutions..

I have found one.. $ f(6) = sqrt{222} $

Is this correct?










share|cite|improve this question















I want to know how to solve this type of questions. How can I find $ f(x)$ from $ f(f(x))$



Suppose, $ f(f(x)) = x$ , then $ f(x)=x$ or $ f(x)=dfrac{(x+1)}{(x-1)}$

how to find these solutions..

I have found one.. $ f(6) = sqrt{222} $

Is this correct?







functions functional-equations






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 23 '16 at 5:05









Rezwan Arefin

1,668528




1,668528










asked Jan 14 '16 at 17:23









Symon Saroar

347




347








  • 1




    There are infinitely many real-valued functions of a real variable such that $f(f(x)) = x$, not just the two you give.
    – Rob Arthan
    Jan 14 '16 at 17:29






  • 1




    The set of involutions is not made by just those functions, and $f(f(x))=x^2+1$ does not give enough information to find a unique value $f(6)$. Do you want to find all the possible values of $f(6)$, given $f(f(x))=x^2+1$?
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    Jan 14 '16 at 17:30










  • For large values of $x$, $f(f(x))approx x^2$, for which a solution is $f(x)=x^{sqrt2}$.
    – Yves Daoust
    Jan 14 '16 at 17:30












  • Related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3633/….
    – Martin R
    Jan 14 '16 at 17:39














  • 1




    There are infinitely many real-valued functions of a real variable such that $f(f(x)) = x$, not just the two you give.
    – Rob Arthan
    Jan 14 '16 at 17:29






  • 1




    The set of involutions is not made by just those functions, and $f(f(x))=x^2+1$ does not give enough information to find a unique value $f(6)$. Do you want to find all the possible values of $f(6)$, given $f(f(x))=x^2+1$?
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    Jan 14 '16 at 17:30










  • For large values of $x$, $f(f(x))approx x^2$, for which a solution is $f(x)=x^{sqrt2}$.
    – Yves Daoust
    Jan 14 '16 at 17:30












  • Related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3633/….
    – Martin R
    Jan 14 '16 at 17:39








1




1




There are infinitely many real-valued functions of a real variable such that $f(f(x)) = x$, not just the two you give.
– Rob Arthan
Jan 14 '16 at 17:29




There are infinitely many real-valued functions of a real variable such that $f(f(x)) = x$, not just the two you give.
– Rob Arthan
Jan 14 '16 at 17:29




1




1




The set of involutions is not made by just those functions, and $f(f(x))=x^2+1$ does not give enough information to find a unique value $f(6)$. Do you want to find all the possible values of $f(6)$, given $f(f(x))=x^2+1$?
– Jack D'Aurizio
Jan 14 '16 at 17:30




The set of involutions is not made by just those functions, and $f(f(x))=x^2+1$ does not give enough information to find a unique value $f(6)$. Do you want to find all the possible values of $f(6)$, given $f(f(x))=x^2+1$?
– Jack D'Aurizio
Jan 14 '16 at 17:30












For large values of $x$, $f(f(x))approx x^2$, for which a solution is $f(x)=x^{sqrt2}$.
– Yves Daoust
Jan 14 '16 at 17:30






For large values of $x$, $f(f(x))approx x^2$, for which a solution is $f(x)=x^{sqrt2}$.
– Yves Daoust
Jan 14 '16 at 17:30














Related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3633/….
– Martin R
Jan 14 '16 at 17:39




Related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3633/….
– Martin R
Jan 14 '16 at 17:39










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
7
down vote













Assume $f(x_1)=f(x_2)$. Then $x_1^2+1=f(f(x_1))=f(f(x_2))=x_2^2+1$ and so $x_2=pm x_1$.
Then from $f(f(-x))=f(f(x))$ we conclude that $f(-x)=pm f(x)$ for all $x$.



Define $gcolon [0,infty)to [0,infty)$ by $g(x)=|f(x)|$.
For $x$ with $g(x)=f(x)$ we have $$g(g(x))=|f(f(x))|=|x^2+1|=x^2+1.$$
And for $x$ with $g(x)=-f(x)$ we have $$g(g(x))=|f(-f(x))|=|pm f(f(x))|=|f(f(x))|=x^2+1$$
as well. Hence $g(g(x))=x^2+1$ for all $xge 0$.
Given a function $g$ with this property, we can easily construct a suitable $f$: Just let $f(x)=begin{cases}g(x)&xge0\g(-x)&x<0end{cases}$. If $g$ is additionally continuous then so is $f$.
We can find a lot of continuous $g$:



Pick $a_1in(0,1)$, let $a_0=0$ and recursively $a_n=a_{n-2}^2+1$ for $nge 2$. Then the sequence $(a_n)$ is strictly increasing towards $infty$.
Now let $g_1colon[0,a_1]to[a_1,1]$ be an arbitrary increasing bijection. We can work our way to infinity from there: Assume we have an increasing bijection $g_ncolon [0,a_n]to [a_1,a_{n+1}]$ such that $g(g(x))=x^2+1$ for $0le xle a_{n-1}$. Then define $g_{n+1}colon [0,a_{n+1}]to[a_1,a_{n+1}]$ by $$g_{n+1}(x)=begin{cases}g_n(x)&0le xle a_n\g_n^{-1}(x)^2+1&a_1< xle a_{n+1}end{cases}$$
(noting that the two cases agree for $a_1le xle a_n$)
and finally $g(x)=g_n(x)$ for any $n$ with $a_nge x$. One verifies that this is well-defined and indeed $g(g(x))=x^2+1$ for all $x$.



Note that the sequence of $a_n$ goes like this: $$0, a_1, 1, a_1^2+1, 2, (a_1^2+1)^2+1, 5, ((a_1^2+1)^2+1)^2+1, 26, ldots$$ and that it is quite clear that we can make our choices (even under the restriction of requiring continuous $f$) at least such that $f(x)$ is an arbitrary number between $6$ and $26$.






share|cite|improve this answer




























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Here is a javascript function that conforms to the original poster's requirement that $f(f(x)) = x^2+1$. The original poster asked what is $f(6)$. This program computes that



    $f(6)=12.813735153397387$



    and



    $f(12.813735153397387)=37$



    QED we see $f(f(6)) = 6^2+1=37$



    function f(x) {
    x<0 && (x=-x);
    return x==x+1 ? Math.pow(x, Math.sqrt(2)) : Math.sqrt(f(x*x+1)-1);
    }


    It is not known that the function $f(x)$ can be expressed in mathematical terms (closed-form). It may be the $f(x)$ implementation in javascript above could help in discovering such a closed-form solution. I only know that the above javascript code adheres to the OP's requirement that $f(f(x)) = x^2+1$ for all $-infty<x<infty$ insofar as javascript has finite precision.



    I wrote the code, BTW. I am sharing it in the hopes that it will be useful.



    Javascript can be executed in a browser sandbox, here is one (no affiliation):
    https://jsconsole.com/



    Here is the equivalent description of the function implemented above:
    $f(x)=begin{cases}f(-x)&x<0\x^{sqrt{2}}&xapprox x+1\sqrt {f(x^2+1)-1}end{cases}$



    I believe this function is the optimal solution for $f(f(x)) = x^2+1$ but I can't prove it.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • As the existing answer says, there's an infinite number of reasonable choices for $f$ resulting in an infinite number of possibilities for $f(6)$. So suggesting a numerical algorithm for a particular $f$ (with no explanation of or motivation for the algorithm, at that) seems rather beside the point.
      – epimorphic
      Nov 11 at 15:49












    • What's specifically wrong with it?
      – epimorphic
      Nov 11 at 18:43










    • Elaboration would be great! :)
      – epimorphic
      Nov 12 at 7:20










    • I'm looking for a smooth f(x) function that doesn't have zig-zags or elbows or a discernable period to it. The solutions that arise from Hagen von Eitzen's scheme (and it is indeed clever) seem jarring to the eye in comparison to the nice, smooth $x^2+1$ curve. They have monotonically increasing $f(x)$ but not monotonically increasing slope. Also they are only the product of an algorithm, likely making a closed-form solution unattainable. The curve my function produces suffers from none of the objections I've brought up and may be expressable in a closed-form solution. I just don't know.
      – dashxdr
      Nov 12 at 7:49













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1612308%2fif-ffx-x2-1-then-f6%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    7
    down vote













    Assume $f(x_1)=f(x_2)$. Then $x_1^2+1=f(f(x_1))=f(f(x_2))=x_2^2+1$ and so $x_2=pm x_1$.
    Then from $f(f(-x))=f(f(x))$ we conclude that $f(-x)=pm f(x)$ for all $x$.



    Define $gcolon [0,infty)to [0,infty)$ by $g(x)=|f(x)|$.
    For $x$ with $g(x)=f(x)$ we have $$g(g(x))=|f(f(x))|=|x^2+1|=x^2+1.$$
    And for $x$ with $g(x)=-f(x)$ we have $$g(g(x))=|f(-f(x))|=|pm f(f(x))|=|f(f(x))|=x^2+1$$
    as well. Hence $g(g(x))=x^2+1$ for all $xge 0$.
    Given a function $g$ with this property, we can easily construct a suitable $f$: Just let $f(x)=begin{cases}g(x)&xge0\g(-x)&x<0end{cases}$. If $g$ is additionally continuous then so is $f$.
    We can find a lot of continuous $g$:



    Pick $a_1in(0,1)$, let $a_0=0$ and recursively $a_n=a_{n-2}^2+1$ for $nge 2$. Then the sequence $(a_n)$ is strictly increasing towards $infty$.
    Now let $g_1colon[0,a_1]to[a_1,1]$ be an arbitrary increasing bijection. We can work our way to infinity from there: Assume we have an increasing bijection $g_ncolon [0,a_n]to [a_1,a_{n+1}]$ such that $g(g(x))=x^2+1$ for $0le xle a_{n-1}$. Then define $g_{n+1}colon [0,a_{n+1}]to[a_1,a_{n+1}]$ by $$g_{n+1}(x)=begin{cases}g_n(x)&0le xle a_n\g_n^{-1}(x)^2+1&a_1< xle a_{n+1}end{cases}$$
    (noting that the two cases agree for $a_1le xle a_n$)
    and finally $g(x)=g_n(x)$ for any $n$ with $a_nge x$. One verifies that this is well-defined and indeed $g(g(x))=x^2+1$ for all $x$.



    Note that the sequence of $a_n$ goes like this: $$0, a_1, 1, a_1^2+1, 2, (a_1^2+1)^2+1, 5, ((a_1^2+1)^2+1)^2+1, 26, ldots$$ and that it is quite clear that we can make our choices (even under the restriction of requiring continuous $f$) at least such that $f(x)$ is an arbitrary number between $6$ and $26$.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      7
      down vote













      Assume $f(x_1)=f(x_2)$. Then $x_1^2+1=f(f(x_1))=f(f(x_2))=x_2^2+1$ and so $x_2=pm x_1$.
      Then from $f(f(-x))=f(f(x))$ we conclude that $f(-x)=pm f(x)$ for all $x$.



      Define $gcolon [0,infty)to [0,infty)$ by $g(x)=|f(x)|$.
      For $x$ with $g(x)=f(x)$ we have $$g(g(x))=|f(f(x))|=|x^2+1|=x^2+1.$$
      And for $x$ with $g(x)=-f(x)$ we have $$g(g(x))=|f(-f(x))|=|pm f(f(x))|=|f(f(x))|=x^2+1$$
      as well. Hence $g(g(x))=x^2+1$ for all $xge 0$.
      Given a function $g$ with this property, we can easily construct a suitable $f$: Just let $f(x)=begin{cases}g(x)&xge0\g(-x)&x<0end{cases}$. If $g$ is additionally continuous then so is $f$.
      We can find a lot of continuous $g$:



      Pick $a_1in(0,1)$, let $a_0=0$ and recursively $a_n=a_{n-2}^2+1$ for $nge 2$. Then the sequence $(a_n)$ is strictly increasing towards $infty$.
      Now let $g_1colon[0,a_1]to[a_1,1]$ be an arbitrary increasing bijection. We can work our way to infinity from there: Assume we have an increasing bijection $g_ncolon [0,a_n]to [a_1,a_{n+1}]$ such that $g(g(x))=x^2+1$ for $0le xle a_{n-1}$. Then define $g_{n+1}colon [0,a_{n+1}]to[a_1,a_{n+1}]$ by $$g_{n+1}(x)=begin{cases}g_n(x)&0le xle a_n\g_n^{-1}(x)^2+1&a_1< xle a_{n+1}end{cases}$$
      (noting that the two cases agree for $a_1le xle a_n$)
      and finally $g(x)=g_n(x)$ for any $n$ with $a_nge x$. One verifies that this is well-defined and indeed $g(g(x))=x^2+1$ for all $x$.



      Note that the sequence of $a_n$ goes like this: $$0, a_1, 1, a_1^2+1, 2, (a_1^2+1)^2+1, 5, ((a_1^2+1)^2+1)^2+1, 26, ldots$$ and that it is quite clear that we can make our choices (even under the restriction of requiring continuous $f$) at least such that $f(x)$ is an arbitrary number between $6$ and $26$.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        7
        down vote










        up vote
        7
        down vote









        Assume $f(x_1)=f(x_2)$. Then $x_1^2+1=f(f(x_1))=f(f(x_2))=x_2^2+1$ and so $x_2=pm x_1$.
        Then from $f(f(-x))=f(f(x))$ we conclude that $f(-x)=pm f(x)$ for all $x$.



        Define $gcolon [0,infty)to [0,infty)$ by $g(x)=|f(x)|$.
        For $x$ with $g(x)=f(x)$ we have $$g(g(x))=|f(f(x))|=|x^2+1|=x^2+1.$$
        And for $x$ with $g(x)=-f(x)$ we have $$g(g(x))=|f(-f(x))|=|pm f(f(x))|=|f(f(x))|=x^2+1$$
        as well. Hence $g(g(x))=x^2+1$ for all $xge 0$.
        Given a function $g$ with this property, we can easily construct a suitable $f$: Just let $f(x)=begin{cases}g(x)&xge0\g(-x)&x<0end{cases}$. If $g$ is additionally continuous then so is $f$.
        We can find a lot of continuous $g$:



        Pick $a_1in(0,1)$, let $a_0=0$ and recursively $a_n=a_{n-2}^2+1$ for $nge 2$. Then the sequence $(a_n)$ is strictly increasing towards $infty$.
        Now let $g_1colon[0,a_1]to[a_1,1]$ be an arbitrary increasing bijection. We can work our way to infinity from there: Assume we have an increasing bijection $g_ncolon [0,a_n]to [a_1,a_{n+1}]$ such that $g(g(x))=x^2+1$ for $0le xle a_{n-1}$. Then define $g_{n+1}colon [0,a_{n+1}]to[a_1,a_{n+1}]$ by $$g_{n+1}(x)=begin{cases}g_n(x)&0le xle a_n\g_n^{-1}(x)^2+1&a_1< xle a_{n+1}end{cases}$$
        (noting that the two cases agree for $a_1le xle a_n$)
        and finally $g(x)=g_n(x)$ for any $n$ with $a_nge x$. One verifies that this is well-defined and indeed $g(g(x))=x^2+1$ for all $x$.



        Note that the sequence of $a_n$ goes like this: $$0, a_1, 1, a_1^2+1, 2, (a_1^2+1)^2+1, 5, ((a_1^2+1)^2+1)^2+1, 26, ldots$$ and that it is quite clear that we can make our choices (even under the restriction of requiring continuous $f$) at least such that $f(x)$ is an arbitrary number between $6$ and $26$.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        Assume $f(x_1)=f(x_2)$. Then $x_1^2+1=f(f(x_1))=f(f(x_2))=x_2^2+1$ and so $x_2=pm x_1$.
        Then from $f(f(-x))=f(f(x))$ we conclude that $f(-x)=pm f(x)$ for all $x$.



        Define $gcolon [0,infty)to [0,infty)$ by $g(x)=|f(x)|$.
        For $x$ with $g(x)=f(x)$ we have $$g(g(x))=|f(f(x))|=|x^2+1|=x^2+1.$$
        And for $x$ with $g(x)=-f(x)$ we have $$g(g(x))=|f(-f(x))|=|pm f(f(x))|=|f(f(x))|=x^2+1$$
        as well. Hence $g(g(x))=x^2+1$ for all $xge 0$.
        Given a function $g$ with this property, we can easily construct a suitable $f$: Just let $f(x)=begin{cases}g(x)&xge0\g(-x)&x<0end{cases}$. If $g$ is additionally continuous then so is $f$.
        We can find a lot of continuous $g$:



        Pick $a_1in(0,1)$, let $a_0=0$ and recursively $a_n=a_{n-2}^2+1$ for $nge 2$. Then the sequence $(a_n)$ is strictly increasing towards $infty$.
        Now let $g_1colon[0,a_1]to[a_1,1]$ be an arbitrary increasing bijection. We can work our way to infinity from there: Assume we have an increasing bijection $g_ncolon [0,a_n]to [a_1,a_{n+1}]$ such that $g(g(x))=x^2+1$ for $0le xle a_{n-1}$. Then define $g_{n+1}colon [0,a_{n+1}]to[a_1,a_{n+1}]$ by $$g_{n+1}(x)=begin{cases}g_n(x)&0le xle a_n\g_n^{-1}(x)^2+1&a_1< xle a_{n+1}end{cases}$$
        (noting that the two cases agree for $a_1le xle a_n$)
        and finally $g(x)=g_n(x)$ for any $n$ with $a_nge x$. One verifies that this is well-defined and indeed $g(g(x))=x^2+1$ for all $x$.



        Note that the sequence of $a_n$ goes like this: $$0, a_1, 1, a_1^2+1, 2, (a_1^2+1)^2+1, 5, ((a_1^2+1)^2+1)^2+1, 26, ldots$$ and that it is quite clear that we can make our choices (even under the restriction of requiring continuous $f$) at least such that $f(x)$ is an arbitrary number between $6$ and $26$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 14 '16 at 20:07









        Hagen von Eitzen

        273k21266493




        273k21266493






















            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Here is a javascript function that conforms to the original poster's requirement that $f(f(x)) = x^2+1$. The original poster asked what is $f(6)$. This program computes that



            $f(6)=12.813735153397387$



            and



            $f(12.813735153397387)=37$



            QED we see $f(f(6)) = 6^2+1=37$



            function f(x) {
            x<0 && (x=-x);
            return x==x+1 ? Math.pow(x, Math.sqrt(2)) : Math.sqrt(f(x*x+1)-1);
            }


            It is not known that the function $f(x)$ can be expressed in mathematical terms (closed-form). It may be the $f(x)$ implementation in javascript above could help in discovering such a closed-form solution. I only know that the above javascript code adheres to the OP's requirement that $f(f(x)) = x^2+1$ for all $-infty<x<infty$ insofar as javascript has finite precision.



            I wrote the code, BTW. I am sharing it in the hopes that it will be useful.



            Javascript can be executed in a browser sandbox, here is one (no affiliation):
            https://jsconsole.com/



            Here is the equivalent description of the function implemented above:
            $f(x)=begin{cases}f(-x)&x<0\x^{sqrt{2}}&xapprox x+1\sqrt {f(x^2+1)-1}end{cases}$



            I believe this function is the optimal solution for $f(f(x)) = x^2+1$ but I can't prove it.






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • As the existing answer says, there's an infinite number of reasonable choices for $f$ resulting in an infinite number of possibilities for $f(6)$. So suggesting a numerical algorithm for a particular $f$ (with no explanation of or motivation for the algorithm, at that) seems rather beside the point.
              – epimorphic
              Nov 11 at 15:49












            • What's specifically wrong with it?
              – epimorphic
              Nov 11 at 18:43










            • Elaboration would be great! :)
              – epimorphic
              Nov 12 at 7:20










            • I'm looking for a smooth f(x) function that doesn't have zig-zags or elbows or a discernable period to it. The solutions that arise from Hagen von Eitzen's scheme (and it is indeed clever) seem jarring to the eye in comparison to the nice, smooth $x^2+1$ curve. They have monotonically increasing $f(x)$ but not monotonically increasing slope. Also they are only the product of an algorithm, likely making a closed-form solution unattainable. The curve my function produces suffers from none of the objections I've brought up and may be expressable in a closed-form solution. I just don't know.
              – dashxdr
              Nov 12 at 7:49

















            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Here is a javascript function that conforms to the original poster's requirement that $f(f(x)) = x^2+1$. The original poster asked what is $f(6)$. This program computes that



            $f(6)=12.813735153397387$



            and



            $f(12.813735153397387)=37$



            QED we see $f(f(6)) = 6^2+1=37$



            function f(x) {
            x<0 && (x=-x);
            return x==x+1 ? Math.pow(x, Math.sqrt(2)) : Math.sqrt(f(x*x+1)-1);
            }


            It is not known that the function $f(x)$ can be expressed in mathematical terms (closed-form). It may be the $f(x)$ implementation in javascript above could help in discovering such a closed-form solution. I only know that the above javascript code adheres to the OP's requirement that $f(f(x)) = x^2+1$ for all $-infty<x<infty$ insofar as javascript has finite precision.



            I wrote the code, BTW. I am sharing it in the hopes that it will be useful.



            Javascript can be executed in a browser sandbox, here is one (no affiliation):
            https://jsconsole.com/



            Here is the equivalent description of the function implemented above:
            $f(x)=begin{cases}f(-x)&x<0\x^{sqrt{2}}&xapprox x+1\sqrt {f(x^2+1)-1}end{cases}$



            I believe this function is the optimal solution for $f(f(x)) = x^2+1$ but I can't prove it.






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • As the existing answer says, there's an infinite number of reasonable choices for $f$ resulting in an infinite number of possibilities for $f(6)$. So suggesting a numerical algorithm for a particular $f$ (with no explanation of or motivation for the algorithm, at that) seems rather beside the point.
              – epimorphic
              Nov 11 at 15:49












            • What's specifically wrong with it?
              – epimorphic
              Nov 11 at 18:43










            • Elaboration would be great! :)
              – epimorphic
              Nov 12 at 7:20










            • I'm looking for a smooth f(x) function that doesn't have zig-zags or elbows or a discernable period to it. The solutions that arise from Hagen von Eitzen's scheme (and it is indeed clever) seem jarring to the eye in comparison to the nice, smooth $x^2+1$ curve. They have monotonically increasing $f(x)$ but not monotonically increasing slope. Also they are only the product of an algorithm, likely making a closed-form solution unattainable. The curve my function produces suffers from none of the objections I've brought up and may be expressable in a closed-form solution. I just don't know.
              – dashxdr
              Nov 12 at 7:49















            up vote
            0
            down vote










            up vote
            0
            down vote









            Here is a javascript function that conforms to the original poster's requirement that $f(f(x)) = x^2+1$. The original poster asked what is $f(6)$. This program computes that



            $f(6)=12.813735153397387$



            and



            $f(12.813735153397387)=37$



            QED we see $f(f(6)) = 6^2+1=37$



            function f(x) {
            x<0 && (x=-x);
            return x==x+1 ? Math.pow(x, Math.sqrt(2)) : Math.sqrt(f(x*x+1)-1);
            }


            It is not known that the function $f(x)$ can be expressed in mathematical terms (closed-form). It may be the $f(x)$ implementation in javascript above could help in discovering such a closed-form solution. I only know that the above javascript code adheres to the OP's requirement that $f(f(x)) = x^2+1$ for all $-infty<x<infty$ insofar as javascript has finite precision.



            I wrote the code, BTW. I am sharing it in the hopes that it will be useful.



            Javascript can be executed in a browser sandbox, here is one (no affiliation):
            https://jsconsole.com/



            Here is the equivalent description of the function implemented above:
            $f(x)=begin{cases}f(-x)&x<0\x^{sqrt{2}}&xapprox x+1\sqrt {f(x^2+1)-1}end{cases}$



            I believe this function is the optimal solution for $f(f(x)) = x^2+1$ but I can't prove it.






            share|cite|improve this answer














            Here is a javascript function that conforms to the original poster's requirement that $f(f(x)) = x^2+1$. The original poster asked what is $f(6)$. This program computes that



            $f(6)=12.813735153397387$



            and



            $f(12.813735153397387)=37$



            QED we see $f(f(6)) = 6^2+1=37$



            function f(x) {
            x<0 && (x=-x);
            return x==x+1 ? Math.pow(x, Math.sqrt(2)) : Math.sqrt(f(x*x+1)-1);
            }


            It is not known that the function $f(x)$ can be expressed in mathematical terms (closed-form). It may be the $f(x)$ implementation in javascript above could help in discovering such a closed-form solution. I only know that the above javascript code adheres to the OP's requirement that $f(f(x)) = x^2+1$ for all $-infty<x<infty$ insofar as javascript has finite precision.



            I wrote the code, BTW. I am sharing it in the hopes that it will be useful.



            Javascript can be executed in a browser sandbox, here is one (no affiliation):
            https://jsconsole.com/



            Here is the equivalent description of the function implemented above:
            $f(x)=begin{cases}f(-x)&x<0\x^{sqrt{2}}&xapprox x+1\sqrt {f(x^2+1)-1}end{cases}$



            I believe this function is the optimal solution for $f(f(x)) = x^2+1$ but I can't prove it.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Nov 14 at 4:20

























            answered Nov 11 at 14:05









            dashxdr

            63




            63












            • As the existing answer says, there's an infinite number of reasonable choices for $f$ resulting in an infinite number of possibilities for $f(6)$. So suggesting a numerical algorithm for a particular $f$ (with no explanation of or motivation for the algorithm, at that) seems rather beside the point.
              – epimorphic
              Nov 11 at 15:49












            • What's specifically wrong with it?
              – epimorphic
              Nov 11 at 18:43










            • Elaboration would be great! :)
              – epimorphic
              Nov 12 at 7:20










            • I'm looking for a smooth f(x) function that doesn't have zig-zags or elbows or a discernable period to it. The solutions that arise from Hagen von Eitzen's scheme (and it is indeed clever) seem jarring to the eye in comparison to the nice, smooth $x^2+1$ curve. They have monotonically increasing $f(x)$ but not monotonically increasing slope. Also they are only the product of an algorithm, likely making a closed-form solution unattainable. The curve my function produces suffers from none of the objections I've brought up and may be expressable in a closed-form solution. I just don't know.
              – dashxdr
              Nov 12 at 7:49




















            • As the existing answer says, there's an infinite number of reasonable choices for $f$ resulting in an infinite number of possibilities for $f(6)$. So suggesting a numerical algorithm for a particular $f$ (with no explanation of or motivation for the algorithm, at that) seems rather beside the point.
              – epimorphic
              Nov 11 at 15:49












            • What's specifically wrong with it?
              – epimorphic
              Nov 11 at 18:43










            • Elaboration would be great! :)
              – epimorphic
              Nov 12 at 7:20










            • I'm looking for a smooth f(x) function that doesn't have zig-zags or elbows or a discernable period to it. The solutions that arise from Hagen von Eitzen's scheme (and it is indeed clever) seem jarring to the eye in comparison to the nice, smooth $x^2+1$ curve. They have monotonically increasing $f(x)$ but not monotonically increasing slope. Also they are only the product of an algorithm, likely making a closed-form solution unattainable. The curve my function produces suffers from none of the objections I've brought up and may be expressable in a closed-form solution. I just don't know.
              – dashxdr
              Nov 12 at 7:49


















            As the existing answer says, there's an infinite number of reasonable choices for $f$ resulting in an infinite number of possibilities for $f(6)$. So suggesting a numerical algorithm for a particular $f$ (with no explanation of or motivation for the algorithm, at that) seems rather beside the point.
            – epimorphic
            Nov 11 at 15:49






            As the existing answer says, there's an infinite number of reasonable choices for $f$ resulting in an infinite number of possibilities for $f(6)$. So suggesting a numerical algorithm for a particular $f$ (with no explanation of or motivation for the algorithm, at that) seems rather beside the point.
            – epimorphic
            Nov 11 at 15:49














            What's specifically wrong with it?
            – epimorphic
            Nov 11 at 18:43




            What's specifically wrong with it?
            – epimorphic
            Nov 11 at 18:43












            Elaboration would be great! :)
            – epimorphic
            Nov 12 at 7:20




            Elaboration would be great! :)
            – epimorphic
            Nov 12 at 7:20












            I'm looking for a smooth f(x) function that doesn't have zig-zags or elbows or a discernable period to it. The solutions that arise from Hagen von Eitzen's scheme (and it is indeed clever) seem jarring to the eye in comparison to the nice, smooth $x^2+1$ curve. They have monotonically increasing $f(x)$ but not monotonically increasing slope. Also they are only the product of an algorithm, likely making a closed-form solution unattainable. The curve my function produces suffers from none of the objections I've brought up and may be expressable in a closed-form solution. I just don't know.
            – dashxdr
            Nov 12 at 7:49






            I'm looking for a smooth f(x) function that doesn't have zig-zags or elbows or a discernable period to it. The solutions that arise from Hagen von Eitzen's scheme (and it is indeed clever) seem jarring to the eye in comparison to the nice, smooth $x^2+1$ curve. They have monotonically increasing $f(x)$ but not monotonically increasing slope. Also they are only the product of an algorithm, likely making a closed-form solution unattainable. The curve my function produces suffers from none of the objections I've brought up and may be expressable in a closed-form solution. I just don't know.
            – dashxdr
            Nov 12 at 7:49




















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1612308%2fif-ffx-x2-1-then-f6%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How do I know what Microsoft account the skydrive app is syncing to?

            When does type information flow backwards in C++?

            Grease: Live!