Show that any non-trivial ideal of $(L_1,*)$ is dense












6












$begingroup$


This is related to this other question, I mean, the linked question comes to my mind trying to solve the following exercise:




Show that any non-trivial ideal of $(L_1,*)$ is dense.




Here $(L_1,*)$ is the space $L_1(Bbb R^n,Bbb R)$ and $*$ stay for convolution. I know that $(L_1,+,*)$ is a Banach algebra without unity. I dont know the concept of "ideal" related to a Banach algebra so I assumed that it is asking for a set $Isubset L_1$ such that $f*varphiin I$ for any pair $(f,varphi)in L_1times I$.



Correct me if my interpretation was wrong.





FIRST APPROACH: I know that if $gin L_1$ and $|g|_1=1$ then $g_epsilon(x):=epsilon^{-n}g(x/epsilon)$ defines a kernel ${g_epsilon:epsilon>0}$ that approximates the unity, that is, I know that



$$lim_{epsilonto 0} g_epsilon* f=|g|_1 f=ftag1$$



in $L_1$ for any chosen $fin L_1$.



Then my first idea was construct some approximation to the unity from a function $f*varphiin I$ (where $(f,varphi)in L_1times I$), that is, I want to show that if $f*varphiin I$ then $(f*varphi)_epsilonin I$ for any $epsilon>0$, from here it would be easy to see that



$$h_epsilon:=frac{(f*varphi)_epsilon}{|f*varphi|_1}in Itag2$$



and $lim_{epsilonto 0}h_epsilon*r=r$ for any chosen $rin L_1$, what would imply that $I$ is dense in $L_1$. Then note that



$$(f*varphi)_epsilon(x)=epsilon^{-n}int f(x/epsilon-y)varphi(y), dy=epsilon^{-n}int f(x-y+K)varphi(y), dytag3$$



for $K:= x/epsilon-x$. Then also note that $epsilon^{-n} f(,cdot+K)in L_1$ for any chosen $KinBbb R^n$, so an heuristic argument make me think from $(3)$ that $(f*varphi)_epsilonin I$. However, this heuristic argument seems wrong, because we cannot fix $K$ as a constant and say that $g(x-y):=f(x/epsilon-y)$ belongs to $L_1$ because $g$ is not well-defined.





SECOND APPROACH:



Note that



$$(f*varphi)_epsilon(x)=epsilon^{-n}int f(x/epsilon-y)varphi(y), dy=epsilon^{-n}int tau_{x/epsilon}check f(y)varphi(y), dy\
=epsilon^{-n}int(tau_{x/epsilon}check fcdot varphi)(y), dy
=epsilon^{-2n}inttau_{x/epsilon}check f(y/epsilon)varphi(y/epsilon), dy
\=epsilon^{-2n}int fleft(frac{x-y}epsilonright)varphi(y/epsilon)=(f_epsilon*varphi_epsilon)(x)tag4$$



where $tau_a f(x)=f(x+a)$ and $check f(x)= f(-x)$. Then it would be enough to show that if $varphiin I$ then $varphi_epsilonin I$, but this doesn't seems feasible.





THIRD APPROACH:



Let any smoothing kernel ${varphi_epsilon:epsilon>0}subset L_1$ (by example the Gaussian kernel) and some $psiin Isetminus{0}$. Then, by the definition of ideal, we knows that $varphi_epsilon*psiin I$ for all $epsilon>0$, thus by $(1)$ we can see that $psi$ is a limit point of $I$, and because this holds for every function on the ideal then we conclude that $I$ is closed and perfect.



Then, if $I$ is dense, it must be the case that $I=L_1$. However Im again stuck here, that is, I dont know how to show that $I=L_1$.



Moreover: if it would be true that $I=L_1$ then $I$ is, indeed, a trivial ideal of $L_1$, contradicting the existence of non-trivial ideals, so the statement to be proved will be a vacuous truth.





Some help will be appreciated, thank you.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    An ideal in an algebra should also be a linear subspace, see mathworld.wolfram.com/Ideal.html, last paragraph. So $I$ is also closed under addition and scalar multiplication.
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    Dec 24 '18 at 1:11






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    In Approach #3, showing that every point of $I$ is a limit point of $I$ would imply that $I$ is perfect, but would not imply that it is closed.
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    Dec 24 '18 at 1:16






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It seems false to me, please tell me if you spot mistakes. Take a Schwartz function $psi$ such that its Fourier transform $hatpsi=mathcal{F}(psi)$ vanishes in some open set. Then $I:={f*psi:fin L^1}$ is an ideal, but each of its elements has a Fourier transform that vanishes in the same open set, because $widehat{f*psi}=hat fhatpsi$. If $I$ were dense, by the continuity of $mathcal{F}:L^1to L^infty$, $mathcal{F}(I)$ would be dense in $mathcal{F}(L^1)$ with $L^infty$ norm. But this is not true: consider a function whose Fourier transform does not vanish where $hatpsi$ does
    $endgroup$
    – Del
    Dec 24 '18 at 22:39


















6












$begingroup$


This is related to this other question, I mean, the linked question comes to my mind trying to solve the following exercise:




Show that any non-trivial ideal of $(L_1,*)$ is dense.




Here $(L_1,*)$ is the space $L_1(Bbb R^n,Bbb R)$ and $*$ stay for convolution. I know that $(L_1,+,*)$ is a Banach algebra without unity. I dont know the concept of "ideal" related to a Banach algebra so I assumed that it is asking for a set $Isubset L_1$ such that $f*varphiin I$ for any pair $(f,varphi)in L_1times I$.



Correct me if my interpretation was wrong.





FIRST APPROACH: I know that if $gin L_1$ and $|g|_1=1$ then $g_epsilon(x):=epsilon^{-n}g(x/epsilon)$ defines a kernel ${g_epsilon:epsilon>0}$ that approximates the unity, that is, I know that



$$lim_{epsilonto 0} g_epsilon* f=|g|_1 f=ftag1$$



in $L_1$ for any chosen $fin L_1$.



Then my first idea was construct some approximation to the unity from a function $f*varphiin I$ (where $(f,varphi)in L_1times I$), that is, I want to show that if $f*varphiin I$ then $(f*varphi)_epsilonin I$ for any $epsilon>0$, from here it would be easy to see that



$$h_epsilon:=frac{(f*varphi)_epsilon}{|f*varphi|_1}in Itag2$$



and $lim_{epsilonto 0}h_epsilon*r=r$ for any chosen $rin L_1$, what would imply that $I$ is dense in $L_1$. Then note that



$$(f*varphi)_epsilon(x)=epsilon^{-n}int f(x/epsilon-y)varphi(y), dy=epsilon^{-n}int f(x-y+K)varphi(y), dytag3$$



for $K:= x/epsilon-x$. Then also note that $epsilon^{-n} f(,cdot+K)in L_1$ for any chosen $KinBbb R^n$, so an heuristic argument make me think from $(3)$ that $(f*varphi)_epsilonin I$. However, this heuristic argument seems wrong, because we cannot fix $K$ as a constant and say that $g(x-y):=f(x/epsilon-y)$ belongs to $L_1$ because $g$ is not well-defined.





SECOND APPROACH:



Note that



$$(f*varphi)_epsilon(x)=epsilon^{-n}int f(x/epsilon-y)varphi(y), dy=epsilon^{-n}int tau_{x/epsilon}check f(y)varphi(y), dy\
=epsilon^{-n}int(tau_{x/epsilon}check fcdot varphi)(y), dy
=epsilon^{-2n}inttau_{x/epsilon}check f(y/epsilon)varphi(y/epsilon), dy
\=epsilon^{-2n}int fleft(frac{x-y}epsilonright)varphi(y/epsilon)=(f_epsilon*varphi_epsilon)(x)tag4$$



where $tau_a f(x)=f(x+a)$ and $check f(x)= f(-x)$. Then it would be enough to show that if $varphiin I$ then $varphi_epsilonin I$, but this doesn't seems feasible.





THIRD APPROACH:



Let any smoothing kernel ${varphi_epsilon:epsilon>0}subset L_1$ (by example the Gaussian kernel) and some $psiin Isetminus{0}$. Then, by the definition of ideal, we knows that $varphi_epsilon*psiin I$ for all $epsilon>0$, thus by $(1)$ we can see that $psi$ is a limit point of $I$, and because this holds for every function on the ideal then we conclude that $I$ is closed and perfect.



Then, if $I$ is dense, it must be the case that $I=L_1$. However Im again stuck here, that is, I dont know how to show that $I=L_1$.



Moreover: if it would be true that $I=L_1$ then $I$ is, indeed, a trivial ideal of $L_1$, contradicting the existence of non-trivial ideals, so the statement to be proved will be a vacuous truth.





Some help will be appreciated, thank you.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    An ideal in an algebra should also be a linear subspace, see mathworld.wolfram.com/Ideal.html, last paragraph. So $I$ is also closed under addition and scalar multiplication.
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    Dec 24 '18 at 1:11






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    In Approach #3, showing that every point of $I$ is a limit point of $I$ would imply that $I$ is perfect, but would not imply that it is closed.
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    Dec 24 '18 at 1:16






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It seems false to me, please tell me if you spot mistakes. Take a Schwartz function $psi$ such that its Fourier transform $hatpsi=mathcal{F}(psi)$ vanishes in some open set. Then $I:={f*psi:fin L^1}$ is an ideal, but each of its elements has a Fourier transform that vanishes in the same open set, because $widehat{f*psi}=hat fhatpsi$. If $I$ were dense, by the continuity of $mathcal{F}:L^1to L^infty$, $mathcal{F}(I)$ would be dense in $mathcal{F}(L^1)$ with $L^infty$ norm. But this is not true: consider a function whose Fourier transform does not vanish where $hatpsi$ does
    $endgroup$
    – Del
    Dec 24 '18 at 22:39
















6












6








6


3



$begingroup$


This is related to this other question, I mean, the linked question comes to my mind trying to solve the following exercise:




Show that any non-trivial ideal of $(L_1,*)$ is dense.




Here $(L_1,*)$ is the space $L_1(Bbb R^n,Bbb R)$ and $*$ stay for convolution. I know that $(L_1,+,*)$ is a Banach algebra without unity. I dont know the concept of "ideal" related to a Banach algebra so I assumed that it is asking for a set $Isubset L_1$ such that $f*varphiin I$ for any pair $(f,varphi)in L_1times I$.



Correct me if my interpretation was wrong.





FIRST APPROACH: I know that if $gin L_1$ and $|g|_1=1$ then $g_epsilon(x):=epsilon^{-n}g(x/epsilon)$ defines a kernel ${g_epsilon:epsilon>0}$ that approximates the unity, that is, I know that



$$lim_{epsilonto 0} g_epsilon* f=|g|_1 f=ftag1$$



in $L_1$ for any chosen $fin L_1$.



Then my first idea was construct some approximation to the unity from a function $f*varphiin I$ (where $(f,varphi)in L_1times I$), that is, I want to show that if $f*varphiin I$ then $(f*varphi)_epsilonin I$ for any $epsilon>0$, from here it would be easy to see that



$$h_epsilon:=frac{(f*varphi)_epsilon}{|f*varphi|_1}in Itag2$$



and $lim_{epsilonto 0}h_epsilon*r=r$ for any chosen $rin L_1$, what would imply that $I$ is dense in $L_1$. Then note that



$$(f*varphi)_epsilon(x)=epsilon^{-n}int f(x/epsilon-y)varphi(y), dy=epsilon^{-n}int f(x-y+K)varphi(y), dytag3$$



for $K:= x/epsilon-x$. Then also note that $epsilon^{-n} f(,cdot+K)in L_1$ for any chosen $KinBbb R^n$, so an heuristic argument make me think from $(3)$ that $(f*varphi)_epsilonin I$. However, this heuristic argument seems wrong, because we cannot fix $K$ as a constant and say that $g(x-y):=f(x/epsilon-y)$ belongs to $L_1$ because $g$ is not well-defined.





SECOND APPROACH:



Note that



$$(f*varphi)_epsilon(x)=epsilon^{-n}int f(x/epsilon-y)varphi(y), dy=epsilon^{-n}int tau_{x/epsilon}check f(y)varphi(y), dy\
=epsilon^{-n}int(tau_{x/epsilon}check fcdot varphi)(y), dy
=epsilon^{-2n}inttau_{x/epsilon}check f(y/epsilon)varphi(y/epsilon), dy
\=epsilon^{-2n}int fleft(frac{x-y}epsilonright)varphi(y/epsilon)=(f_epsilon*varphi_epsilon)(x)tag4$$



where $tau_a f(x)=f(x+a)$ and $check f(x)= f(-x)$. Then it would be enough to show that if $varphiin I$ then $varphi_epsilonin I$, but this doesn't seems feasible.





THIRD APPROACH:



Let any smoothing kernel ${varphi_epsilon:epsilon>0}subset L_1$ (by example the Gaussian kernel) and some $psiin Isetminus{0}$. Then, by the definition of ideal, we knows that $varphi_epsilon*psiin I$ for all $epsilon>0$, thus by $(1)$ we can see that $psi$ is a limit point of $I$, and because this holds for every function on the ideal then we conclude that $I$ is closed and perfect.



Then, if $I$ is dense, it must be the case that $I=L_1$. However Im again stuck here, that is, I dont know how to show that $I=L_1$.



Moreover: if it would be true that $I=L_1$ then $I$ is, indeed, a trivial ideal of $L_1$, contradicting the existence of non-trivial ideals, so the statement to be proved will be a vacuous truth.





Some help will be appreciated, thank you.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




This is related to this other question, I mean, the linked question comes to my mind trying to solve the following exercise:




Show that any non-trivial ideal of $(L_1,*)$ is dense.




Here $(L_1,*)$ is the space $L_1(Bbb R^n,Bbb R)$ and $*$ stay for convolution. I know that $(L_1,+,*)$ is a Banach algebra without unity. I dont know the concept of "ideal" related to a Banach algebra so I assumed that it is asking for a set $Isubset L_1$ such that $f*varphiin I$ for any pair $(f,varphi)in L_1times I$.



Correct me if my interpretation was wrong.





FIRST APPROACH: I know that if $gin L_1$ and $|g|_1=1$ then $g_epsilon(x):=epsilon^{-n}g(x/epsilon)$ defines a kernel ${g_epsilon:epsilon>0}$ that approximates the unity, that is, I know that



$$lim_{epsilonto 0} g_epsilon* f=|g|_1 f=ftag1$$



in $L_1$ for any chosen $fin L_1$.



Then my first idea was construct some approximation to the unity from a function $f*varphiin I$ (where $(f,varphi)in L_1times I$), that is, I want to show that if $f*varphiin I$ then $(f*varphi)_epsilonin I$ for any $epsilon>0$, from here it would be easy to see that



$$h_epsilon:=frac{(f*varphi)_epsilon}{|f*varphi|_1}in Itag2$$



and $lim_{epsilonto 0}h_epsilon*r=r$ for any chosen $rin L_1$, what would imply that $I$ is dense in $L_1$. Then note that



$$(f*varphi)_epsilon(x)=epsilon^{-n}int f(x/epsilon-y)varphi(y), dy=epsilon^{-n}int f(x-y+K)varphi(y), dytag3$$



for $K:= x/epsilon-x$. Then also note that $epsilon^{-n} f(,cdot+K)in L_1$ for any chosen $KinBbb R^n$, so an heuristic argument make me think from $(3)$ that $(f*varphi)_epsilonin I$. However, this heuristic argument seems wrong, because we cannot fix $K$ as a constant and say that $g(x-y):=f(x/epsilon-y)$ belongs to $L_1$ because $g$ is not well-defined.





SECOND APPROACH:



Note that



$$(f*varphi)_epsilon(x)=epsilon^{-n}int f(x/epsilon-y)varphi(y), dy=epsilon^{-n}int tau_{x/epsilon}check f(y)varphi(y), dy\
=epsilon^{-n}int(tau_{x/epsilon}check fcdot varphi)(y), dy
=epsilon^{-2n}inttau_{x/epsilon}check f(y/epsilon)varphi(y/epsilon), dy
\=epsilon^{-2n}int fleft(frac{x-y}epsilonright)varphi(y/epsilon)=(f_epsilon*varphi_epsilon)(x)tag4$$



where $tau_a f(x)=f(x+a)$ and $check f(x)= f(-x)$. Then it would be enough to show that if $varphiin I$ then $varphi_epsilonin I$, but this doesn't seems feasible.





THIRD APPROACH:



Let any smoothing kernel ${varphi_epsilon:epsilon>0}subset L_1$ (by example the Gaussian kernel) and some $psiin Isetminus{0}$. Then, by the definition of ideal, we knows that $varphi_epsilon*psiin I$ for all $epsilon>0$, thus by $(1)$ we can see that $psi$ is a limit point of $I$, and because this holds for every function on the ideal then we conclude that $I$ is closed and perfect.



Then, if $I$ is dense, it must be the case that $I=L_1$. However Im again stuck here, that is, I dont know how to show that $I=L_1$.



Moreover: if it would be true that $I=L_1$ then $I$ is, indeed, a trivial ideal of $L_1$, contradicting the existence of non-trivial ideals, so the statement to be proved will be a vacuous truth.





Some help will be appreciated, thank you.







real-analysis abstract-algebra lp-spaces convolution






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 23 '18 at 22:21







Masacroso

















asked Dec 21 '18 at 17:03









MasacrosoMasacroso

13.1k41747




13.1k41747








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    An ideal in an algebra should also be a linear subspace, see mathworld.wolfram.com/Ideal.html, last paragraph. So $I$ is also closed under addition and scalar multiplication.
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    Dec 24 '18 at 1:11






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    In Approach #3, showing that every point of $I$ is a limit point of $I$ would imply that $I$ is perfect, but would not imply that it is closed.
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    Dec 24 '18 at 1:16






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It seems false to me, please tell me if you spot mistakes. Take a Schwartz function $psi$ such that its Fourier transform $hatpsi=mathcal{F}(psi)$ vanishes in some open set. Then $I:={f*psi:fin L^1}$ is an ideal, but each of its elements has a Fourier transform that vanishes in the same open set, because $widehat{f*psi}=hat fhatpsi$. If $I$ were dense, by the continuity of $mathcal{F}:L^1to L^infty$, $mathcal{F}(I)$ would be dense in $mathcal{F}(L^1)$ with $L^infty$ norm. But this is not true: consider a function whose Fourier transform does not vanish where $hatpsi$ does
    $endgroup$
    – Del
    Dec 24 '18 at 22:39
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    An ideal in an algebra should also be a linear subspace, see mathworld.wolfram.com/Ideal.html, last paragraph. So $I$ is also closed under addition and scalar multiplication.
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    Dec 24 '18 at 1:11






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    In Approach #3, showing that every point of $I$ is a limit point of $I$ would imply that $I$ is perfect, but would not imply that it is closed.
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    Dec 24 '18 at 1:16






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It seems false to me, please tell me if you spot mistakes. Take a Schwartz function $psi$ such that its Fourier transform $hatpsi=mathcal{F}(psi)$ vanishes in some open set. Then $I:={f*psi:fin L^1}$ is an ideal, but each of its elements has a Fourier transform that vanishes in the same open set, because $widehat{f*psi}=hat fhatpsi$. If $I$ were dense, by the continuity of $mathcal{F}:L^1to L^infty$, $mathcal{F}(I)$ would be dense in $mathcal{F}(L^1)$ with $L^infty$ norm. But this is not true: consider a function whose Fourier transform does not vanish where $hatpsi$ does
    $endgroup$
    – Del
    Dec 24 '18 at 22:39










1




1




$begingroup$
An ideal in an algebra should also be a linear subspace, see mathworld.wolfram.com/Ideal.html, last paragraph. So $I$ is also closed under addition and scalar multiplication.
$endgroup$
– Nate Eldredge
Dec 24 '18 at 1:11




$begingroup$
An ideal in an algebra should also be a linear subspace, see mathworld.wolfram.com/Ideal.html, last paragraph. So $I$ is also closed under addition and scalar multiplication.
$endgroup$
– Nate Eldredge
Dec 24 '18 at 1:11




1




1




$begingroup$
In Approach #3, showing that every point of $I$ is a limit point of $I$ would imply that $I$ is perfect, but would not imply that it is closed.
$endgroup$
– Nate Eldredge
Dec 24 '18 at 1:16




$begingroup$
In Approach #3, showing that every point of $I$ is a limit point of $I$ would imply that $I$ is perfect, but would not imply that it is closed.
$endgroup$
– Nate Eldredge
Dec 24 '18 at 1:16




1




1




$begingroup$
It seems false to me, please tell me if you spot mistakes. Take a Schwartz function $psi$ such that its Fourier transform $hatpsi=mathcal{F}(psi)$ vanishes in some open set. Then $I:={f*psi:fin L^1}$ is an ideal, but each of its elements has a Fourier transform that vanishes in the same open set, because $widehat{f*psi}=hat fhatpsi$. If $I$ were dense, by the continuity of $mathcal{F}:L^1to L^infty$, $mathcal{F}(I)$ would be dense in $mathcal{F}(L^1)$ with $L^infty$ norm. But this is not true: consider a function whose Fourier transform does not vanish where $hatpsi$ does
$endgroup$
– Del
Dec 24 '18 at 22:39






$begingroup$
It seems false to me, please tell me if you spot mistakes. Take a Schwartz function $psi$ such that its Fourier transform $hatpsi=mathcal{F}(psi)$ vanishes in some open set. Then $I:={f*psi:fin L^1}$ is an ideal, but each of its elements has a Fourier transform that vanishes in the same open set, because $widehat{f*psi}=hat fhatpsi$. If $I$ were dense, by the continuity of $mathcal{F}:L^1to L^infty$, $mathcal{F}(I)$ would be dense in $mathcal{F}(L^1)$ with $L^infty$ norm. But this is not true: consider a function whose Fourier transform does not vanish where $hatpsi$ does
$endgroup$
– Del
Dec 24 '18 at 22:39












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3048703%2fshow-that-any-non-trivial-ideal-of-l-1-is-dense%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3048703%2fshow-that-any-non-trivial-ideal-of-l-1-is-dense%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Aardman Animations

Are they similar matrix

“minimization” problem in Euclidean space related to orthonormal basis