Show that any non-trivial ideal of $(L_1,*)$ is dense
$begingroup$
This is related to this other question, I mean, the linked question comes to my mind trying to solve the following exercise:
Show that any non-trivial ideal of $(L_1,*)$ is dense.
Here $(L_1,*)$ is the space $L_1(Bbb R^n,Bbb R)$ and $*$ stay for convolution. I know that $(L_1,+,*)$ is a Banach algebra without unity. I dont know the concept of "ideal" related to a Banach algebra so I assumed that it is asking for a set $Isubset L_1$ such that $f*varphiin I$ for any pair $(f,varphi)in L_1times I$.
Correct me if my interpretation was wrong.
FIRST APPROACH: I know that if $gin L_1$ and $|g|_1=1$ then $g_epsilon(x):=epsilon^{-n}g(x/epsilon)$ defines a kernel ${g_epsilon:epsilon>0}$ that approximates the unity, that is, I know that
$$lim_{epsilonto 0} g_epsilon* f=|g|_1 f=ftag1$$
in $L_1$ for any chosen $fin L_1$.
Then my first idea was construct some approximation to the unity from a function $f*varphiin I$ (where $(f,varphi)in L_1times I$), that is, I want to show that if $f*varphiin I$ then $(f*varphi)_epsilonin I$ for any $epsilon>0$, from here it would be easy to see that
$$h_epsilon:=frac{(f*varphi)_epsilon}{|f*varphi|_1}in Itag2$$
and $lim_{epsilonto 0}h_epsilon*r=r$ for any chosen $rin L_1$, what would imply that $I$ is dense in $L_1$. Then note that
$$(f*varphi)_epsilon(x)=epsilon^{-n}int f(x/epsilon-y)varphi(y), dy=epsilon^{-n}int f(x-y+K)varphi(y), dytag3$$
for $K:= x/epsilon-x$. Then also note that $epsilon^{-n} f(,cdot+K)in L_1$ for any chosen $KinBbb R^n$, so an heuristic argument make me think from $(3)$ that $(f*varphi)_epsilonin I$. However, this heuristic argument seems wrong, because we cannot fix $K$ as a constant and say that $g(x-y):=f(x/epsilon-y)$ belongs to $L_1$ because $g$ is not well-defined.
SECOND APPROACH:
Note that
$$(f*varphi)_epsilon(x)=epsilon^{-n}int f(x/epsilon-y)varphi(y), dy=epsilon^{-n}int tau_{x/epsilon}check f(y)varphi(y), dy\
=epsilon^{-n}int(tau_{x/epsilon}check fcdot varphi)(y), dy
=epsilon^{-2n}inttau_{x/epsilon}check f(y/epsilon)varphi(y/epsilon), dy
\=epsilon^{-2n}int fleft(frac{x-y}epsilonright)varphi(y/epsilon)=(f_epsilon*varphi_epsilon)(x)tag4$$
where $tau_a f(x)=f(x+a)$ and $check f(x)= f(-x)$. Then it would be enough to show that if $varphiin I$ then $varphi_epsilonin I$, but this doesn't seems feasible.
THIRD APPROACH:
Let any smoothing kernel ${varphi_epsilon:epsilon>0}subset L_1$ (by example the Gaussian kernel) and some $psiin Isetminus{0}$. Then, by the definition of ideal, we knows that $varphi_epsilon*psiin I$ for all $epsilon>0$, thus by $(1)$ we can see that $psi$ is a limit point of $I$, and because this holds for every function on the ideal then we conclude that $I$ is closed and perfect.
Then, if $I$ is dense, it must be the case that $I=L_1$. However Im again stuck here, that is, I dont know how to show that $I=L_1$.
Moreover: if it would be true that $I=L_1$ then $I$ is, indeed, a trivial ideal of $L_1$, contradicting the existence of non-trivial ideals, so the statement to be proved will be a vacuous truth.
Some help will be appreciated, thank you.
real-analysis abstract-algebra lp-spaces convolution
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is related to this other question, I mean, the linked question comes to my mind trying to solve the following exercise:
Show that any non-trivial ideal of $(L_1,*)$ is dense.
Here $(L_1,*)$ is the space $L_1(Bbb R^n,Bbb R)$ and $*$ stay for convolution. I know that $(L_1,+,*)$ is a Banach algebra without unity. I dont know the concept of "ideal" related to a Banach algebra so I assumed that it is asking for a set $Isubset L_1$ such that $f*varphiin I$ for any pair $(f,varphi)in L_1times I$.
Correct me if my interpretation was wrong.
FIRST APPROACH: I know that if $gin L_1$ and $|g|_1=1$ then $g_epsilon(x):=epsilon^{-n}g(x/epsilon)$ defines a kernel ${g_epsilon:epsilon>0}$ that approximates the unity, that is, I know that
$$lim_{epsilonto 0} g_epsilon* f=|g|_1 f=ftag1$$
in $L_1$ for any chosen $fin L_1$.
Then my first idea was construct some approximation to the unity from a function $f*varphiin I$ (where $(f,varphi)in L_1times I$), that is, I want to show that if $f*varphiin I$ then $(f*varphi)_epsilonin I$ for any $epsilon>0$, from here it would be easy to see that
$$h_epsilon:=frac{(f*varphi)_epsilon}{|f*varphi|_1}in Itag2$$
and $lim_{epsilonto 0}h_epsilon*r=r$ for any chosen $rin L_1$, what would imply that $I$ is dense in $L_1$. Then note that
$$(f*varphi)_epsilon(x)=epsilon^{-n}int f(x/epsilon-y)varphi(y), dy=epsilon^{-n}int f(x-y+K)varphi(y), dytag3$$
for $K:= x/epsilon-x$. Then also note that $epsilon^{-n} f(,cdot+K)in L_1$ for any chosen $KinBbb R^n$, so an heuristic argument make me think from $(3)$ that $(f*varphi)_epsilonin I$. However, this heuristic argument seems wrong, because we cannot fix $K$ as a constant and say that $g(x-y):=f(x/epsilon-y)$ belongs to $L_1$ because $g$ is not well-defined.
SECOND APPROACH:
Note that
$$(f*varphi)_epsilon(x)=epsilon^{-n}int f(x/epsilon-y)varphi(y), dy=epsilon^{-n}int tau_{x/epsilon}check f(y)varphi(y), dy\
=epsilon^{-n}int(tau_{x/epsilon}check fcdot varphi)(y), dy
=epsilon^{-2n}inttau_{x/epsilon}check f(y/epsilon)varphi(y/epsilon), dy
\=epsilon^{-2n}int fleft(frac{x-y}epsilonright)varphi(y/epsilon)=(f_epsilon*varphi_epsilon)(x)tag4$$
where $tau_a f(x)=f(x+a)$ and $check f(x)= f(-x)$. Then it would be enough to show that if $varphiin I$ then $varphi_epsilonin I$, but this doesn't seems feasible.
THIRD APPROACH:
Let any smoothing kernel ${varphi_epsilon:epsilon>0}subset L_1$ (by example the Gaussian kernel) and some $psiin Isetminus{0}$. Then, by the definition of ideal, we knows that $varphi_epsilon*psiin I$ for all $epsilon>0$, thus by $(1)$ we can see that $psi$ is a limit point of $I$, and because this holds for every function on the ideal then we conclude that $I$ is closed and perfect.
Then, if $I$ is dense, it must be the case that $I=L_1$. However Im again stuck here, that is, I dont know how to show that $I=L_1$.
Moreover: if it would be true that $I=L_1$ then $I$ is, indeed, a trivial ideal of $L_1$, contradicting the existence of non-trivial ideals, so the statement to be proved will be a vacuous truth.
Some help will be appreciated, thank you.
real-analysis abstract-algebra lp-spaces convolution
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
An ideal in an algebra should also be a linear subspace, see mathworld.wolfram.com/Ideal.html, last paragraph. So $I$ is also closed under addition and scalar multiplication.
$endgroup$
– Nate Eldredge
Dec 24 '18 at 1:11
1
$begingroup$
In Approach #3, showing that every point of $I$ is a limit point of $I$ would imply that $I$ is perfect, but would not imply that it is closed.
$endgroup$
– Nate Eldredge
Dec 24 '18 at 1:16
1
$begingroup$
It seems false to me, please tell me if you spot mistakes. Take a Schwartz function $psi$ such that its Fourier transform $hatpsi=mathcal{F}(psi)$ vanishes in some open set. Then $I:={f*psi:fin L^1}$ is an ideal, but each of its elements has a Fourier transform that vanishes in the same open set, because $widehat{f*psi}=hat fhatpsi$. If $I$ were dense, by the continuity of $mathcal{F}:L^1to L^infty$, $mathcal{F}(I)$ would be dense in $mathcal{F}(L^1)$ with $L^infty$ norm. But this is not true: consider a function whose Fourier transform does not vanish where $hatpsi$ does
$endgroup$
– Del
Dec 24 '18 at 22:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is related to this other question, I mean, the linked question comes to my mind trying to solve the following exercise:
Show that any non-trivial ideal of $(L_1,*)$ is dense.
Here $(L_1,*)$ is the space $L_1(Bbb R^n,Bbb R)$ and $*$ stay for convolution. I know that $(L_1,+,*)$ is a Banach algebra without unity. I dont know the concept of "ideal" related to a Banach algebra so I assumed that it is asking for a set $Isubset L_1$ such that $f*varphiin I$ for any pair $(f,varphi)in L_1times I$.
Correct me if my interpretation was wrong.
FIRST APPROACH: I know that if $gin L_1$ and $|g|_1=1$ then $g_epsilon(x):=epsilon^{-n}g(x/epsilon)$ defines a kernel ${g_epsilon:epsilon>0}$ that approximates the unity, that is, I know that
$$lim_{epsilonto 0} g_epsilon* f=|g|_1 f=ftag1$$
in $L_1$ for any chosen $fin L_1$.
Then my first idea was construct some approximation to the unity from a function $f*varphiin I$ (where $(f,varphi)in L_1times I$), that is, I want to show that if $f*varphiin I$ then $(f*varphi)_epsilonin I$ for any $epsilon>0$, from here it would be easy to see that
$$h_epsilon:=frac{(f*varphi)_epsilon}{|f*varphi|_1}in Itag2$$
and $lim_{epsilonto 0}h_epsilon*r=r$ for any chosen $rin L_1$, what would imply that $I$ is dense in $L_1$. Then note that
$$(f*varphi)_epsilon(x)=epsilon^{-n}int f(x/epsilon-y)varphi(y), dy=epsilon^{-n}int f(x-y+K)varphi(y), dytag3$$
for $K:= x/epsilon-x$. Then also note that $epsilon^{-n} f(,cdot+K)in L_1$ for any chosen $KinBbb R^n$, so an heuristic argument make me think from $(3)$ that $(f*varphi)_epsilonin I$. However, this heuristic argument seems wrong, because we cannot fix $K$ as a constant and say that $g(x-y):=f(x/epsilon-y)$ belongs to $L_1$ because $g$ is not well-defined.
SECOND APPROACH:
Note that
$$(f*varphi)_epsilon(x)=epsilon^{-n}int f(x/epsilon-y)varphi(y), dy=epsilon^{-n}int tau_{x/epsilon}check f(y)varphi(y), dy\
=epsilon^{-n}int(tau_{x/epsilon}check fcdot varphi)(y), dy
=epsilon^{-2n}inttau_{x/epsilon}check f(y/epsilon)varphi(y/epsilon), dy
\=epsilon^{-2n}int fleft(frac{x-y}epsilonright)varphi(y/epsilon)=(f_epsilon*varphi_epsilon)(x)tag4$$
where $tau_a f(x)=f(x+a)$ and $check f(x)= f(-x)$. Then it would be enough to show that if $varphiin I$ then $varphi_epsilonin I$, but this doesn't seems feasible.
THIRD APPROACH:
Let any smoothing kernel ${varphi_epsilon:epsilon>0}subset L_1$ (by example the Gaussian kernel) and some $psiin Isetminus{0}$. Then, by the definition of ideal, we knows that $varphi_epsilon*psiin I$ for all $epsilon>0$, thus by $(1)$ we can see that $psi$ is a limit point of $I$, and because this holds for every function on the ideal then we conclude that $I$ is closed and perfect.
Then, if $I$ is dense, it must be the case that $I=L_1$. However Im again stuck here, that is, I dont know how to show that $I=L_1$.
Moreover: if it would be true that $I=L_1$ then $I$ is, indeed, a trivial ideal of $L_1$, contradicting the existence of non-trivial ideals, so the statement to be proved will be a vacuous truth.
Some help will be appreciated, thank you.
real-analysis abstract-algebra lp-spaces convolution
$endgroup$
This is related to this other question, I mean, the linked question comes to my mind trying to solve the following exercise:
Show that any non-trivial ideal of $(L_1,*)$ is dense.
Here $(L_1,*)$ is the space $L_1(Bbb R^n,Bbb R)$ and $*$ stay for convolution. I know that $(L_1,+,*)$ is a Banach algebra without unity. I dont know the concept of "ideal" related to a Banach algebra so I assumed that it is asking for a set $Isubset L_1$ such that $f*varphiin I$ for any pair $(f,varphi)in L_1times I$.
Correct me if my interpretation was wrong.
FIRST APPROACH: I know that if $gin L_1$ and $|g|_1=1$ then $g_epsilon(x):=epsilon^{-n}g(x/epsilon)$ defines a kernel ${g_epsilon:epsilon>0}$ that approximates the unity, that is, I know that
$$lim_{epsilonto 0} g_epsilon* f=|g|_1 f=ftag1$$
in $L_1$ for any chosen $fin L_1$.
Then my first idea was construct some approximation to the unity from a function $f*varphiin I$ (where $(f,varphi)in L_1times I$), that is, I want to show that if $f*varphiin I$ then $(f*varphi)_epsilonin I$ for any $epsilon>0$, from here it would be easy to see that
$$h_epsilon:=frac{(f*varphi)_epsilon}{|f*varphi|_1}in Itag2$$
and $lim_{epsilonto 0}h_epsilon*r=r$ for any chosen $rin L_1$, what would imply that $I$ is dense in $L_1$. Then note that
$$(f*varphi)_epsilon(x)=epsilon^{-n}int f(x/epsilon-y)varphi(y), dy=epsilon^{-n}int f(x-y+K)varphi(y), dytag3$$
for $K:= x/epsilon-x$. Then also note that $epsilon^{-n} f(,cdot+K)in L_1$ for any chosen $KinBbb R^n$, so an heuristic argument make me think from $(3)$ that $(f*varphi)_epsilonin I$. However, this heuristic argument seems wrong, because we cannot fix $K$ as a constant and say that $g(x-y):=f(x/epsilon-y)$ belongs to $L_1$ because $g$ is not well-defined.
SECOND APPROACH:
Note that
$$(f*varphi)_epsilon(x)=epsilon^{-n}int f(x/epsilon-y)varphi(y), dy=epsilon^{-n}int tau_{x/epsilon}check f(y)varphi(y), dy\
=epsilon^{-n}int(tau_{x/epsilon}check fcdot varphi)(y), dy
=epsilon^{-2n}inttau_{x/epsilon}check f(y/epsilon)varphi(y/epsilon), dy
\=epsilon^{-2n}int fleft(frac{x-y}epsilonright)varphi(y/epsilon)=(f_epsilon*varphi_epsilon)(x)tag4$$
where $tau_a f(x)=f(x+a)$ and $check f(x)= f(-x)$. Then it would be enough to show that if $varphiin I$ then $varphi_epsilonin I$, but this doesn't seems feasible.
THIRD APPROACH:
Let any smoothing kernel ${varphi_epsilon:epsilon>0}subset L_1$ (by example the Gaussian kernel) and some $psiin Isetminus{0}$. Then, by the definition of ideal, we knows that $varphi_epsilon*psiin I$ for all $epsilon>0$, thus by $(1)$ we can see that $psi$ is a limit point of $I$, and because this holds for every function on the ideal then we conclude that $I$ is closed and perfect.
Then, if $I$ is dense, it must be the case that $I=L_1$. However Im again stuck here, that is, I dont know how to show that $I=L_1$.
Moreover: if it would be true that $I=L_1$ then $I$ is, indeed, a trivial ideal of $L_1$, contradicting the existence of non-trivial ideals, so the statement to be proved will be a vacuous truth.
Some help will be appreciated, thank you.
real-analysis abstract-algebra lp-spaces convolution
real-analysis abstract-algebra lp-spaces convolution
edited Dec 23 '18 at 22:21
Masacroso
asked Dec 21 '18 at 17:03
MasacrosoMasacroso
13.1k41747
13.1k41747
1
$begingroup$
An ideal in an algebra should also be a linear subspace, see mathworld.wolfram.com/Ideal.html, last paragraph. So $I$ is also closed under addition and scalar multiplication.
$endgroup$
– Nate Eldredge
Dec 24 '18 at 1:11
1
$begingroup$
In Approach #3, showing that every point of $I$ is a limit point of $I$ would imply that $I$ is perfect, but would not imply that it is closed.
$endgroup$
– Nate Eldredge
Dec 24 '18 at 1:16
1
$begingroup$
It seems false to me, please tell me if you spot mistakes. Take a Schwartz function $psi$ such that its Fourier transform $hatpsi=mathcal{F}(psi)$ vanishes in some open set. Then $I:={f*psi:fin L^1}$ is an ideal, but each of its elements has a Fourier transform that vanishes in the same open set, because $widehat{f*psi}=hat fhatpsi$. If $I$ were dense, by the continuity of $mathcal{F}:L^1to L^infty$, $mathcal{F}(I)$ would be dense in $mathcal{F}(L^1)$ with $L^infty$ norm. But this is not true: consider a function whose Fourier transform does not vanish where $hatpsi$ does
$endgroup$
– Del
Dec 24 '18 at 22:39
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
An ideal in an algebra should also be a linear subspace, see mathworld.wolfram.com/Ideal.html, last paragraph. So $I$ is also closed under addition and scalar multiplication.
$endgroup$
– Nate Eldredge
Dec 24 '18 at 1:11
1
$begingroup$
In Approach #3, showing that every point of $I$ is a limit point of $I$ would imply that $I$ is perfect, but would not imply that it is closed.
$endgroup$
– Nate Eldredge
Dec 24 '18 at 1:16
1
$begingroup$
It seems false to me, please tell me if you spot mistakes. Take a Schwartz function $psi$ such that its Fourier transform $hatpsi=mathcal{F}(psi)$ vanishes in some open set. Then $I:={f*psi:fin L^1}$ is an ideal, but each of its elements has a Fourier transform that vanishes in the same open set, because $widehat{f*psi}=hat fhatpsi$. If $I$ were dense, by the continuity of $mathcal{F}:L^1to L^infty$, $mathcal{F}(I)$ would be dense in $mathcal{F}(L^1)$ with $L^infty$ norm. But this is not true: consider a function whose Fourier transform does not vanish where $hatpsi$ does
$endgroup$
– Del
Dec 24 '18 at 22:39
1
1
$begingroup$
An ideal in an algebra should also be a linear subspace, see mathworld.wolfram.com/Ideal.html, last paragraph. So $I$ is also closed under addition and scalar multiplication.
$endgroup$
– Nate Eldredge
Dec 24 '18 at 1:11
$begingroup$
An ideal in an algebra should also be a linear subspace, see mathworld.wolfram.com/Ideal.html, last paragraph. So $I$ is also closed under addition and scalar multiplication.
$endgroup$
– Nate Eldredge
Dec 24 '18 at 1:11
1
1
$begingroup$
In Approach #3, showing that every point of $I$ is a limit point of $I$ would imply that $I$ is perfect, but would not imply that it is closed.
$endgroup$
– Nate Eldredge
Dec 24 '18 at 1:16
$begingroup$
In Approach #3, showing that every point of $I$ is a limit point of $I$ would imply that $I$ is perfect, but would not imply that it is closed.
$endgroup$
– Nate Eldredge
Dec 24 '18 at 1:16
1
1
$begingroup$
It seems false to me, please tell me if you spot mistakes. Take a Schwartz function $psi$ such that its Fourier transform $hatpsi=mathcal{F}(psi)$ vanishes in some open set. Then $I:={f*psi:fin L^1}$ is an ideal, but each of its elements has a Fourier transform that vanishes in the same open set, because $widehat{f*psi}=hat fhatpsi$. If $I$ were dense, by the continuity of $mathcal{F}:L^1to L^infty$, $mathcal{F}(I)$ would be dense in $mathcal{F}(L^1)$ with $L^infty$ norm. But this is not true: consider a function whose Fourier transform does not vanish where $hatpsi$ does
$endgroup$
– Del
Dec 24 '18 at 22:39
$begingroup$
It seems false to me, please tell me if you spot mistakes. Take a Schwartz function $psi$ such that its Fourier transform $hatpsi=mathcal{F}(psi)$ vanishes in some open set. Then $I:={f*psi:fin L^1}$ is an ideal, but each of its elements has a Fourier transform that vanishes in the same open set, because $widehat{f*psi}=hat fhatpsi$. If $I$ were dense, by the continuity of $mathcal{F}:L^1to L^infty$, $mathcal{F}(I)$ would be dense in $mathcal{F}(L^1)$ with $L^infty$ norm. But this is not true: consider a function whose Fourier transform does not vanish where $hatpsi$ does
$endgroup$
– Del
Dec 24 '18 at 22:39
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3048703%2fshow-that-any-non-trivial-ideal-of-l-1-is-dense%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3048703%2fshow-that-any-non-trivial-ideal-of-l-1-is-dense%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
An ideal in an algebra should also be a linear subspace, see mathworld.wolfram.com/Ideal.html, last paragraph. So $I$ is also closed under addition and scalar multiplication.
$endgroup$
– Nate Eldredge
Dec 24 '18 at 1:11
1
$begingroup$
In Approach #3, showing that every point of $I$ is a limit point of $I$ would imply that $I$ is perfect, but would not imply that it is closed.
$endgroup$
– Nate Eldredge
Dec 24 '18 at 1:16
1
$begingroup$
It seems false to me, please tell me if you spot mistakes. Take a Schwartz function $psi$ such that its Fourier transform $hatpsi=mathcal{F}(psi)$ vanishes in some open set. Then $I:={f*psi:fin L^1}$ is an ideal, but each of its elements has a Fourier transform that vanishes in the same open set, because $widehat{f*psi}=hat fhatpsi$. If $I$ were dense, by the continuity of $mathcal{F}:L^1to L^infty$, $mathcal{F}(I)$ would be dense in $mathcal{F}(L^1)$ with $L^infty$ norm. But this is not true: consider a function whose Fourier transform does not vanish where $hatpsi$ does
$endgroup$
– Del
Dec 24 '18 at 22:39