Fourier transform of given signal












4












$begingroup$


enter image description here



This is the signal whose FT i need to find, at first i thought that i could solve this as a convolution of two rectangular pulses, but i could not find pulses that fit into this (it turns out that parts from -T/2 to 0 and T to 3T/2 are always somehow narrow). I could also try by definition but that's just too much work and very time consuming, the third option is derivative theorem, but i don't know how to use it, since i never actually used it. Any help appreciated!










share|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Maybe that is not "one" signal. Maybe it can be decomposed into elementary signals whose FT are known...
    $endgroup$
    – A_A
    Feb 7 at 11:48










  • $begingroup$
    @A_A as i said in my question, i believe it is a convoultion of two rectangular pulses, but i am having hard time finding them
    $endgroup$
    – cdummie
    Feb 7 at 11:57






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Maybe that is not "one" signal. Maybe it can be decomposed into elementary signals whose FT are known...
    $endgroup$
    – A_A
    Feb 7 at 12:34
















4












$begingroup$


enter image description here



This is the signal whose FT i need to find, at first i thought that i could solve this as a convolution of two rectangular pulses, but i could not find pulses that fit into this (it turns out that parts from -T/2 to 0 and T to 3T/2 are always somehow narrow). I could also try by definition but that's just too much work and very time consuming, the third option is derivative theorem, but i don't know how to use it, since i never actually used it. Any help appreciated!










share|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Maybe that is not "one" signal. Maybe it can be decomposed into elementary signals whose FT are known...
    $endgroup$
    – A_A
    Feb 7 at 11:48










  • $begingroup$
    @A_A as i said in my question, i believe it is a convoultion of two rectangular pulses, but i am having hard time finding them
    $endgroup$
    – cdummie
    Feb 7 at 11:57






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Maybe that is not "one" signal. Maybe it can be decomposed into elementary signals whose FT are known...
    $endgroup$
    – A_A
    Feb 7 at 12:34














4












4








4


1



$begingroup$


enter image description here



This is the signal whose FT i need to find, at first i thought that i could solve this as a convolution of two rectangular pulses, but i could not find pulses that fit into this (it turns out that parts from -T/2 to 0 and T to 3T/2 are always somehow narrow). I could also try by definition but that's just too much work and very time consuming, the third option is derivative theorem, but i don't know how to use it, since i never actually used it. Any help appreciated!










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




enter image description here



This is the signal whose FT i need to find, at first i thought that i could solve this as a convolution of two rectangular pulses, but i could not find pulses that fit into this (it turns out that parts from -T/2 to 0 and T to 3T/2 are always somehow narrow). I could also try by definition but that's just too much work and very time consuming, the third option is derivative theorem, but i don't know how to use it, since i never actually used it. Any help appreciated!







fourier-transform






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Feb 7 at 11:16









cdummiecdummie

1355




1355












  • $begingroup$
    Maybe that is not "one" signal. Maybe it can be decomposed into elementary signals whose FT are known...
    $endgroup$
    – A_A
    Feb 7 at 11:48










  • $begingroup$
    @A_A as i said in my question, i believe it is a convoultion of two rectangular pulses, but i am having hard time finding them
    $endgroup$
    – cdummie
    Feb 7 at 11:57






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Maybe that is not "one" signal. Maybe it can be decomposed into elementary signals whose FT are known...
    $endgroup$
    – A_A
    Feb 7 at 12:34


















  • $begingroup$
    Maybe that is not "one" signal. Maybe it can be decomposed into elementary signals whose FT are known...
    $endgroup$
    – A_A
    Feb 7 at 11:48










  • $begingroup$
    @A_A as i said in my question, i believe it is a convoultion of two rectangular pulses, but i am having hard time finding them
    $endgroup$
    – cdummie
    Feb 7 at 11:57






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Maybe that is not "one" signal. Maybe it can be decomposed into elementary signals whose FT are known...
    $endgroup$
    – A_A
    Feb 7 at 12:34
















$begingroup$
Maybe that is not "one" signal. Maybe it can be decomposed into elementary signals whose FT are known...
$endgroup$
– A_A
Feb 7 at 11:48




$begingroup$
Maybe that is not "one" signal. Maybe it can be decomposed into elementary signals whose FT are known...
$endgroup$
– A_A
Feb 7 at 11:48












$begingroup$
@A_A as i said in my question, i believe it is a convoultion of two rectangular pulses, but i am having hard time finding them
$endgroup$
– cdummie
Feb 7 at 11:57




$begingroup$
@A_A as i said in my question, i believe it is a convoultion of two rectangular pulses, but i am having hard time finding them
$endgroup$
– cdummie
Feb 7 at 11:57




1




1




$begingroup$
Maybe that is not "one" signal. Maybe it can be decomposed into elementary signals whose FT are known...
$endgroup$
– A_A
Feb 7 at 12:34




$begingroup$
Maybe that is not "one" signal. Maybe it can be decomposed into elementary signals whose FT are known...
$endgroup$
– A_A
Feb 7 at 12:34










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

HINT:



It can be solved by convolution. Take two rectangles, one that is non-zero in $[-T/2,T]$ and the other being non-zero in $[0,T/2]$. Now you just have to choose the amplitudes right and the convolution of the two signals will look like the one in your question.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    Hint:



    If you can get away from your insistence of finding the FT via expressing the waveform as the convolution of two rectangular pulses, consider that the waveform can be expressed as a triangular waveform (base $left[-frac T2, frac{3T}{2}
    right]$
    and peak $2A$) minus another triangular waveform (base $[0, T]$ and peak $A$). Both of these have FTs that you can look up in a table (or easily derive a tabulated FT such as that of a triangular waveform of base $left[-frac T2, frac T2right]$ and peak $1$) and you are done.



    Or, each of the two triangular waveforms that I have described above can be more easily expressed as the convolution of rectangular pulses of equal width (different pulse widths for the two triangles, of course) and so the FTs of each triangular waveform is a $operatorname{sinc}^2$ function. Now, whether your homework grader will accept a difference of $operatorname{sinc}^2$ functions as a correct answer is a different matter.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      What is wrong with a difference of sinc^2? As a grader, you have to live with the existence of equivalent answers.
      $endgroup$
      – MSalters
      Feb 7 at 15:07










    • $begingroup$
      @DilipSarwate This is really neat way to find FT for this signal, i must say, it's great idea, however, when i was solving this by using convolution theorem i got product of two $$sinc^2$$ functions, i suppose that it could be equivalent to the difference of $$sinc^2$$ found this way.
      $endgroup$
      – cdummie
      Feb 7 at 15:15



















    1












    $begingroup$

    You could see it as an overlapping of $3$ Triangular functions, if the Triangular function is defined as follows:



    $$Delta(t) = begin{cases}
    1 - frac{2}{T}|t| qquad & |t| < frac{T}{2} \
    0 qquad & mathrm{otherwise} \
    end{cases}$$



    Notice that we have one grid period equal to $ frac{T}{2}$. If we look closely at the figure, we can see that we have two ramp-up's (each on the edge), where each corresponds to the left/right parts of $Delta(t)$. Now, another important thing to notice is the plateau region, which contains two grid periods. Each grid period could be see as two overlapping triangles. With that being said, we can model your function as
    $$x(t) =A Big(Delta(t) + Delta(t- frac{T}{2} ) + Delta(t- T ) Big)$$



    Making use of the linearity property and the the fact that a time shift translates to a phase shift in frequency domain, we get



    $$X(w) = A big(1 + e^{-jw frac{T}{2}} + e^{-jw T} big)Delta(w )$$
    where $Delta(w) = mathcal{F} Big(Delta(t) Big)$, which is computed using the definition,



    $$X(w) = int_{-infty}^{infty} x(t) e^{-j w t} dt = Aint_{-frac{T}{2}}^{0} (1 + frac{2}{T} t) e^{-j w t} dt + Aint_{0}^{frac{T}{2}} (1 - frac{2}{T} t) e^{-j w t} dt$$
    Using $int e^{-jwt} = frac{j}{w} e^{-jwt}$ and $int t e^{-jwt} = frac{j}{w} te^{-jwt} - frac{1}{w^2}e^{-jwt} $, we get
    begin{equation}
    begin{split}
    X(w) &= ABig[ frac{j}{w} e^{-jwt} Big]_{-frac{T}{2}}^{0} + frac{2A}{T}Big[ frac{j}{w} te^{-jwt} - frac{1}{w^2}e^{-jwt} Big]_{-frac{T}{2}}^{0} \
    &+
    ABig[ frac{j}{w} e^{-jwt} Big]_{0}^{frac{T}{2}} - frac{2A}{T}Big[ frac{j}{w} te^{-jwt} - frac{1}{w^2}e^{-jwt} Big]_{0}^{frac{T}{2}}
    end{split}
    end{equation}

    Replacing and a bit of arrangements will give you
    begin{equation}
    begin{split}
    X(w) &= frac{4A}{w^2 T}Big( cos(frac{T}{2} w) - 1 Big)
    end{split}
    end{equation}






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "295"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdsp.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f55345%2ffourier-transform-of-given-signal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3












      $begingroup$

      HINT:



      It can be solved by convolution. Take two rectangles, one that is non-zero in $[-T/2,T]$ and the other being non-zero in $[0,T/2]$. Now you just have to choose the amplitudes right and the convolution of the two signals will look like the one in your question.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        3












        $begingroup$

        HINT:



        It can be solved by convolution. Take two rectangles, one that is non-zero in $[-T/2,T]$ and the other being non-zero in $[0,T/2]$. Now you just have to choose the amplitudes right and the convolution of the two signals will look like the one in your question.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          HINT:



          It can be solved by convolution. Take two rectangles, one that is non-zero in $[-T/2,T]$ and the other being non-zero in $[0,T/2]$. Now you just have to choose the amplitudes right and the convolution of the two signals will look like the one in your question.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          HINT:



          It can be solved by convolution. Take two rectangles, one that is non-zero in $[-T/2,T]$ and the other being non-zero in $[0,T/2]$. Now you just have to choose the amplitudes right and the convolution of the two signals will look like the one in your question.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Feb 7 at 11:54









          Matt L.Matt L.

          50.7k23889




          50.7k23889























              2












              $begingroup$

              Hint:



              If you can get away from your insistence of finding the FT via expressing the waveform as the convolution of two rectangular pulses, consider that the waveform can be expressed as a triangular waveform (base $left[-frac T2, frac{3T}{2}
              right]$
              and peak $2A$) minus another triangular waveform (base $[0, T]$ and peak $A$). Both of these have FTs that you can look up in a table (or easily derive a tabulated FT such as that of a triangular waveform of base $left[-frac T2, frac T2right]$ and peak $1$) and you are done.



              Or, each of the two triangular waveforms that I have described above can be more easily expressed as the convolution of rectangular pulses of equal width (different pulse widths for the two triangles, of course) and so the FTs of each triangular waveform is a $operatorname{sinc}^2$ function. Now, whether your homework grader will accept a difference of $operatorname{sinc}^2$ functions as a correct answer is a different matter.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                What is wrong with a difference of sinc^2? As a grader, you have to live with the existence of equivalent answers.
                $endgroup$
                – MSalters
                Feb 7 at 15:07










              • $begingroup$
                @DilipSarwate This is really neat way to find FT for this signal, i must say, it's great idea, however, when i was solving this by using convolution theorem i got product of two $$sinc^2$$ functions, i suppose that it could be equivalent to the difference of $$sinc^2$$ found this way.
                $endgroup$
                – cdummie
                Feb 7 at 15:15
















              2












              $begingroup$

              Hint:



              If you can get away from your insistence of finding the FT via expressing the waveform as the convolution of two rectangular pulses, consider that the waveform can be expressed as a triangular waveform (base $left[-frac T2, frac{3T}{2}
              right]$
              and peak $2A$) minus another triangular waveform (base $[0, T]$ and peak $A$). Both of these have FTs that you can look up in a table (or easily derive a tabulated FT such as that of a triangular waveform of base $left[-frac T2, frac T2right]$ and peak $1$) and you are done.



              Or, each of the two triangular waveforms that I have described above can be more easily expressed as the convolution of rectangular pulses of equal width (different pulse widths for the two triangles, of course) and so the FTs of each triangular waveform is a $operatorname{sinc}^2$ function. Now, whether your homework grader will accept a difference of $operatorname{sinc}^2$ functions as a correct answer is a different matter.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                What is wrong with a difference of sinc^2? As a grader, you have to live with the existence of equivalent answers.
                $endgroup$
                – MSalters
                Feb 7 at 15:07










              • $begingroup$
                @DilipSarwate This is really neat way to find FT for this signal, i must say, it's great idea, however, when i was solving this by using convolution theorem i got product of two $$sinc^2$$ functions, i suppose that it could be equivalent to the difference of $$sinc^2$$ found this way.
                $endgroup$
                – cdummie
                Feb 7 at 15:15














              2












              2








              2





              $begingroup$

              Hint:



              If you can get away from your insistence of finding the FT via expressing the waveform as the convolution of two rectangular pulses, consider that the waveform can be expressed as a triangular waveform (base $left[-frac T2, frac{3T}{2}
              right]$
              and peak $2A$) minus another triangular waveform (base $[0, T]$ and peak $A$). Both of these have FTs that you can look up in a table (or easily derive a tabulated FT such as that of a triangular waveform of base $left[-frac T2, frac T2right]$ and peak $1$) and you are done.



              Or, each of the two triangular waveforms that I have described above can be more easily expressed as the convolution of rectangular pulses of equal width (different pulse widths for the two triangles, of course) and so the FTs of each triangular waveform is a $operatorname{sinc}^2$ function. Now, whether your homework grader will accept a difference of $operatorname{sinc}^2$ functions as a correct answer is a different matter.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              Hint:



              If you can get away from your insistence of finding the FT via expressing the waveform as the convolution of two rectangular pulses, consider that the waveform can be expressed as a triangular waveform (base $left[-frac T2, frac{3T}{2}
              right]$
              and peak $2A$) minus another triangular waveform (base $[0, T]$ and peak $A$). Both of these have FTs that you can look up in a table (or easily derive a tabulated FT such as that of a triangular waveform of base $left[-frac T2, frac T2right]$ and peak $1$) and you are done.



              Or, each of the two triangular waveforms that I have described above can be more easily expressed as the convolution of rectangular pulses of equal width (different pulse widths for the two triangles, of course) and so the FTs of each triangular waveform is a $operatorname{sinc}^2$ function. Now, whether your homework grader will accept a difference of $operatorname{sinc}^2$ functions as a correct answer is a different matter.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Feb 7 at 13:24









              Dilip SarwateDilip Sarwate

              13.2k12463




              13.2k12463












              • $begingroup$
                What is wrong with a difference of sinc^2? As a grader, you have to live with the existence of equivalent answers.
                $endgroup$
                – MSalters
                Feb 7 at 15:07










              • $begingroup$
                @DilipSarwate This is really neat way to find FT for this signal, i must say, it's great idea, however, when i was solving this by using convolution theorem i got product of two $$sinc^2$$ functions, i suppose that it could be equivalent to the difference of $$sinc^2$$ found this way.
                $endgroup$
                – cdummie
                Feb 7 at 15:15


















              • $begingroup$
                What is wrong with a difference of sinc^2? As a grader, you have to live with the existence of equivalent answers.
                $endgroup$
                – MSalters
                Feb 7 at 15:07










              • $begingroup$
                @DilipSarwate This is really neat way to find FT for this signal, i must say, it's great idea, however, when i was solving this by using convolution theorem i got product of two $$sinc^2$$ functions, i suppose that it could be equivalent to the difference of $$sinc^2$$ found this way.
                $endgroup$
                – cdummie
                Feb 7 at 15:15
















              $begingroup$
              What is wrong with a difference of sinc^2? As a grader, you have to live with the existence of equivalent answers.
              $endgroup$
              – MSalters
              Feb 7 at 15:07




              $begingroup$
              What is wrong with a difference of sinc^2? As a grader, you have to live with the existence of equivalent answers.
              $endgroup$
              – MSalters
              Feb 7 at 15:07












              $begingroup$
              @DilipSarwate This is really neat way to find FT for this signal, i must say, it's great idea, however, when i was solving this by using convolution theorem i got product of two $$sinc^2$$ functions, i suppose that it could be equivalent to the difference of $$sinc^2$$ found this way.
              $endgroup$
              – cdummie
              Feb 7 at 15:15




              $begingroup$
              @DilipSarwate This is really neat way to find FT for this signal, i must say, it's great idea, however, when i was solving this by using convolution theorem i got product of two $$sinc^2$$ functions, i suppose that it could be equivalent to the difference of $$sinc^2$$ found this way.
              $endgroup$
              – cdummie
              Feb 7 at 15:15











              1












              $begingroup$

              You could see it as an overlapping of $3$ Triangular functions, if the Triangular function is defined as follows:



              $$Delta(t) = begin{cases}
              1 - frac{2}{T}|t| qquad & |t| < frac{T}{2} \
              0 qquad & mathrm{otherwise} \
              end{cases}$$



              Notice that we have one grid period equal to $ frac{T}{2}$. If we look closely at the figure, we can see that we have two ramp-up's (each on the edge), where each corresponds to the left/right parts of $Delta(t)$. Now, another important thing to notice is the plateau region, which contains two grid periods. Each grid period could be see as two overlapping triangles. With that being said, we can model your function as
              $$x(t) =A Big(Delta(t) + Delta(t- frac{T}{2} ) + Delta(t- T ) Big)$$



              Making use of the linearity property and the the fact that a time shift translates to a phase shift in frequency domain, we get



              $$X(w) = A big(1 + e^{-jw frac{T}{2}} + e^{-jw T} big)Delta(w )$$
              where $Delta(w) = mathcal{F} Big(Delta(t) Big)$, which is computed using the definition,



              $$X(w) = int_{-infty}^{infty} x(t) e^{-j w t} dt = Aint_{-frac{T}{2}}^{0} (1 + frac{2}{T} t) e^{-j w t} dt + Aint_{0}^{frac{T}{2}} (1 - frac{2}{T} t) e^{-j w t} dt$$
              Using $int e^{-jwt} = frac{j}{w} e^{-jwt}$ and $int t e^{-jwt} = frac{j}{w} te^{-jwt} - frac{1}{w^2}e^{-jwt} $, we get
              begin{equation}
              begin{split}
              X(w) &= ABig[ frac{j}{w} e^{-jwt} Big]_{-frac{T}{2}}^{0} + frac{2A}{T}Big[ frac{j}{w} te^{-jwt} - frac{1}{w^2}e^{-jwt} Big]_{-frac{T}{2}}^{0} \
              &+
              ABig[ frac{j}{w} e^{-jwt} Big]_{0}^{frac{T}{2}} - frac{2A}{T}Big[ frac{j}{w} te^{-jwt} - frac{1}{w^2}e^{-jwt} Big]_{0}^{frac{T}{2}}
              end{split}
              end{equation}

              Replacing and a bit of arrangements will give you
              begin{equation}
              begin{split}
              X(w) &= frac{4A}{w^2 T}Big( cos(frac{T}{2} w) - 1 Big)
              end{split}
              end{equation}






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                You could see it as an overlapping of $3$ Triangular functions, if the Triangular function is defined as follows:



                $$Delta(t) = begin{cases}
                1 - frac{2}{T}|t| qquad & |t| < frac{T}{2} \
                0 qquad & mathrm{otherwise} \
                end{cases}$$



                Notice that we have one grid period equal to $ frac{T}{2}$. If we look closely at the figure, we can see that we have two ramp-up's (each on the edge), where each corresponds to the left/right parts of $Delta(t)$. Now, another important thing to notice is the plateau region, which contains two grid periods. Each grid period could be see as two overlapping triangles. With that being said, we can model your function as
                $$x(t) =A Big(Delta(t) + Delta(t- frac{T}{2} ) + Delta(t- T ) Big)$$



                Making use of the linearity property and the the fact that a time shift translates to a phase shift in frequency domain, we get



                $$X(w) = A big(1 + e^{-jw frac{T}{2}} + e^{-jw T} big)Delta(w )$$
                where $Delta(w) = mathcal{F} Big(Delta(t) Big)$, which is computed using the definition,



                $$X(w) = int_{-infty}^{infty} x(t) e^{-j w t} dt = Aint_{-frac{T}{2}}^{0} (1 + frac{2}{T} t) e^{-j w t} dt + Aint_{0}^{frac{T}{2}} (1 - frac{2}{T} t) e^{-j w t} dt$$
                Using $int e^{-jwt} = frac{j}{w} e^{-jwt}$ and $int t e^{-jwt} = frac{j}{w} te^{-jwt} - frac{1}{w^2}e^{-jwt} $, we get
                begin{equation}
                begin{split}
                X(w) &= ABig[ frac{j}{w} e^{-jwt} Big]_{-frac{T}{2}}^{0} + frac{2A}{T}Big[ frac{j}{w} te^{-jwt} - frac{1}{w^2}e^{-jwt} Big]_{-frac{T}{2}}^{0} \
                &+
                ABig[ frac{j}{w} e^{-jwt} Big]_{0}^{frac{T}{2}} - frac{2A}{T}Big[ frac{j}{w} te^{-jwt} - frac{1}{w^2}e^{-jwt} Big]_{0}^{frac{T}{2}}
                end{split}
                end{equation}

                Replacing and a bit of arrangements will give you
                begin{equation}
                begin{split}
                X(w) &= frac{4A}{w^2 T}Big( cos(frac{T}{2} w) - 1 Big)
                end{split}
                end{equation}






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  You could see it as an overlapping of $3$ Triangular functions, if the Triangular function is defined as follows:



                  $$Delta(t) = begin{cases}
                  1 - frac{2}{T}|t| qquad & |t| < frac{T}{2} \
                  0 qquad & mathrm{otherwise} \
                  end{cases}$$



                  Notice that we have one grid period equal to $ frac{T}{2}$. If we look closely at the figure, we can see that we have two ramp-up's (each on the edge), where each corresponds to the left/right parts of $Delta(t)$. Now, another important thing to notice is the plateau region, which contains two grid periods. Each grid period could be see as two overlapping triangles. With that being said, we can model your function as
                  $$x(t) =A Big(Delta(t) + Delta(t- frac{T}{2} ) + Delta(t- T ) Big)$$



                  Making use of the linearity property and the the fact that a time shift translates to a phase shift in frequency domain, we get



                  $$X(w) = A big(1 + e^{-jw frac{T}{2}} + e^{-jw T} big)Delta(w )$$
                  where $Delta(w) = mathcal{F} Big(Delta(t) Big)$, which is computed using the definition,



                  $$X(w) = int_{-infty}^{infty} x(t) e^{-j w t} dt = Aint_{-frac{T}{2}}^{0} (1 + frac{2}{T} t) e^{-j w t} dt + Aint_{0}^{frac{T}{2}} (1 - frac{2}{T} t) e^{-j w t} dt$$
                  Using $int e^{-jwt} = frac{j}{w} e^{-jwt}$ and $int t e^{-jwt} = frac{j}{w} te^{-jwt} - frac{1}{w^2}e^{-jwt} $, we get
                  begin{equation}
                  begin{split}
                  X(w) &= ABig[ frac{j}{w} e^{-jwt} Big]_{-frac{T}{2}}^{0} + frac{2A}{T}Big[ frac{j}{w} te^{-jwt} - frac{1}{w^2}e^{-jwt} Big]_{-frac{T}{2}}^{0} \
                  &+
                  ABig[ frac{j}{w} e^{-jwt} Big]_{0}^{frac{T}{2}} - frac{2A}{T}Big[ frac{j}{w} te^{-jwt} - frac{1}{w^2}e^{-jwt} Big]_{0}^{frac{T}{2}}
                  end{split}
                  end{equation}

                  Replacing and a bit of arrangements will give you
                  begin{equation}
                  begin{split}
                  X(w) &= frac{4A}{w^2 T}Big( cos(frac{T}{2} w) - 1 Big)
                  end{split}
                  end{equation}






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  You could see it as an overlapping of $3$ Triangular functions, if the Triangular function is defined as follows:



                  $$Delta(t) = begin{cases}
                  1 - frac{2}{T}|t| qquad & |t| < frac{T}{2} \
                  0 qquad & mathrm{otherwise} \
                  end{cases}$$



                  Notice that we have one grid period equal to $ frac{T}{2}$. If we look closely at the figure, we can see that we have two ramp-up's (each on the edge), where each corresponds to the left/right parts of $Delta(t)$. Now, another important thing to notice is the plateau region, which contains two grid periods. Each grid period could be see as two overlapping triangles. With that being said, we can model your function as
                  $$x(t) =A Big(Delta(t) + Delta(t- frac{T}{2} ) + Delta(t- T ) Big)$$



                  Making use of the linearity property and the the fact that a time shift translates to a phase shift in frequency domain, we get



                  $$X(w) = A big(1 + e^{-jw frac{T}{2}} + e^{-jw T} big)Delta(w )$$
                  where $Delta(w) = mathcal{F} Big(Delta(t) Big)$, which is computed using the definition,



                  $$X(w) = int_{-infty}^{infty} x(t) e^{-j w t} dt = Aint_{-frac{T}{2}}^{0} (1 + frac{2}{T} t) e^{-j w t} dt + Aint_{0}^{frac{T}{2}} (1 - frac{2}{T} t) e^{-j w t} dt$$
                  Using $int e^{-jwt} = frac{j}{w} e^{-jwt}$ and $int t e^{-jwt} = frac{j}{w} te^{-jwt} - frac{1}{w^2}e^{-jwt} $, we get
                  begin{equation}
                  begin{split}
                  X(w) &= ABig[ frac{j}{w} e^{-jwt} Big]_{-frac{T}{2}}^{0} + frac{2A}{T}Big[ frac{j}{w} te^{-jwt} - frac{1}{w^2}e^{-jwt} Big]_{-frac{T}{2}}^{0} \
                  &+
                  ABig[ frac{j}{w} e^{-jwt} Big]_{0}^{frac{T}{2}} - frac{2A}{T}Big[ frac{j}{w} te^{-jwt} - frac{1}{w^2}e^{-jwt} Big]_{0}^{frac{T}{2}}
                  end{split}
                  end{equation}

                  Replacing and a bit of arrangements will give you
                  begin{equation}
                  begin{split}
                  X(w) &= frac{4A}{w^2 T}Big( cos(frac{T}{2} w) - 1 Big)
                  end{split}
                  end{equation}







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Feb 7 at 13:31

























                  answered Feb 7 at 12:36









                  Ahmad BazziAhmad Bazzi

                  426212




                  426212






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Signal Processing Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdsp.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f55345%2ffourier-transform-of-given-signal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Aardman Animations

                      Are they similar matrix

                      “minimization” problem in Euclidean space related to orthonormal basis