grep output is not in stdout or stderr












0















I'm trying to find files that contain 'ash' and 'bun' with the following bash command:



grep --line-buffered -ril ash  | xargs -d 'n' grep -il bun


Output from the first grep only (the names of files containing 'ash') appears as expected on the terminal screen, but nothing is being printed to the pipe. I verified this with:



grep --line-buffered -ril ash &> junk


junk is empty.



I have GNOME Terminal 3.6.2, GNU grep 2.16 and Ubuntu 14.04. The output from grep is coloured.



I'm aware of grep's buffering quirks but the output appears on separate lines, so I assume it's being flushed.



Anybody?










share|improve this question























  • Have you tried the simpler version grep -ril foo | xarg grep -il bar? Works for me. There is also this simpler syntax.

    – xenoid
    Feb 13 at 15:01











  • Thanks xenoid, some helpful ideas there (I'm not exactly sure what `cat -` is doing, but it looks promising). I've discovered that my issue remains a buffering issue. I thought --line-buffered would flush output to the pipe, but it doesn't seem to. The command works, it just doesn't print anything to the pipe until it's finished processing (even though the output is visible on the terminal).

    – b1tr4t
    Feb 13 at 19:40













  • You should also (and maybe, only ) force line-buffering on the second instance...

    – xenoid
    Feb 13 at 20:16











  • For some reason it's working more quickly now. Must be a system issue. --line-buffered on first, second or both doesn't seem to make any difference..

    – b1tr4t
    Feb 14 at 3:12
















0















I'm trying to find files that contain 'ash' and 'bun' with the following bash command:



grep --line-buffered -ril ash  | xargs -d 'n' grep -il bun


Output from the first grep only (the names of files containing 'ash') appears as expected on the terminal screen, but nothing is being printed to the pipe. I verified this with:



grep --line-buffered -ril ash &> junk


junk is empty.



I have GNOME Terminal 3.6.2, GNU grep 2.16 and Ubuntu 14.04. The output from grep is coloured.



I'm aware of grep's buffering quirks but the output appears on separate lines, so I assume it's being flushed.



Anybody?










share|improve this question























  • Have you tried the simpler version grep -ril foo | xarg grep -il bar? Works for me. There is also this simpler syntax.

    – xenoid
    Feb 13 at 15:01











  • Thanks xenoid, some helpful ideas there (I'm not exactly sure what `cat -` is doing, but it looks promising). I've discovered that my issue remains a buffering issue. I thought --line-buffered would flush output to the pipe, but it doesn't seem to. The command works, it just doesn't print anything to the pipe until it's finished processing (even though the output is visible on the terminal).

    – b1tr4t
    Feb 13 at 19:40













  • You should also (and maybe, only ) force line-buffering on the second instance...

    – xenoid
    Feb 13 at 20:16











  • For some reason it's working more quickly now. Must be a system issue. --line-buffered on first, second or both doesn't seem to make any difference..

    – b1tr4t
    Feb 14 at 3:12














0












0








0








I'm trying to find files that contain 'ash' and 'bun' with the following bash command:



grep --line-buffered -ril ash  | xargs -d 'n' grep -il bun


Output from the first grep only (the names of files containing 'ash') appears as expected on the terminal screen, but nothing is being printed to the pipe. I verified this with:



grep --line-buffered -ril ash &> junk


junk is empty.



I have GNOME Terminal 3.6.2, GNU grep 2.16 and Ubuntu 14.04. The output from grep is coloured.



I'm aware of grep's buffering quirks but the output appears on separate lines, so I assume it's being flushed.



Anybody?










share|improve this question














I'm trying to find files that contain 'ash' and 'bun' with the following bash command:



grep --line-buffered -ril ash  | xargs -d 'n' grep -il bun


Output from the first grep only (the names of files containing 'ash') appears as expected on the terminal screen, but nothing is being printed to the pipe. I verified this with:



grep --line-buffered -ril ash &> junk


junk is empty.



I have GNOME Terminal 3.6.2, GNU grep 2.16 and Ubuntu 14.04. The output from grep is coloured.



I'm aware of grep's buffering quirks but the output appears on separate lines, so I assume it's being flushed.



Anybody?







bash terminal grep stdout






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Feb 13 at 10:27









b1tr4tb1tr4t

1




1













  • Have you tried the simpler version grep -ril foo | xarg grep -il bar? Works for me. There is also this simpler syntax.

    – xenoid
    Feb 13 at 15:01











  • Thanks xenoid, some helpful ideas there (I'm not exactly sure what `cat -` is doing, but it looks promising). I've discovered that my issue remains a buffering issue. I thought --line-buffered would flush output to the pipe, but it doesn't seem to. The command works, it just doesn't print anything to the pipe until it's finished processing (even though the output is visible on the terminal).

    – b1tr4t
    Feb 13 at 19:40













  • You should also (and maybe, only ) force line-buffering on the second instance...

    – xenoid
    Feb 13 at 20:16











  • For some reason it's working more quickly now. Must be a system issue. --line-buffered on first, second or both doesn't seem to make any difference..

    – b1tr4t
    Feb 14 at 3:12



















  • Have you tried the simpler version grep -ril foo | xarg grep -il bar? Works for me. There is also this simpler syntax.

    – xenoid
    Feb 13 at 15:01











  • Thanks xenoid, some helpful ideas there (I'm not exactly sure what `cat -` is doing, but it looks promising). I've discovered that my issue remains a buffering issue. I thought --line-buffered would flush output to the pipe, but it doesn't seem to. The command works, it just doesn't print anything to the pipe until it's finished processing (even though the output is visible on the terminal).

    – b1tr4t
    Feb 13 at 19:40













  • You should also (and maybe, only ) force line-buffering on the second instance...

    – xenoid
    Feb 13 at 20:16











  • For some reason it's working more quickly now. Must be a system issue. --line-buffered on first, second or both doesn't seem to make any difference..

    – b1tr4t
    Feb 14 at 3:12

















Have you tried the simpler version grep -ril foo | xarg grep -il bar? Works for me. There is also this simpler syntax.

– xenoid
Feb 13 at 15:01





Have you tried the simpler version grep -ril foo | xarg grep -il bar? Works for me. There is also this simpler syntax.

– xenoid
Feb 13 at 15:01













Thanks xenoid, some helpful ideas there (I'm not exactly sure what `cat -` is doing, but it looks promising). I've discovered that my issue remains a buffering issue. I thought --line-buffered would flush output to the pipe, but it doesn't seem to. The command works, it just doesn't print anything to the pipe until it's finished processing (even though the output is visible on the terminal).

– b1tr4t
Feb 13 at 19:40







Thanks xenoid, some helpful ideas there (I'm not exactly sure what `cat -` is doing, but it looks promising). I've discovered that my issue remains a buffering issue. I thought --line-buffered would flush output to the pipe, but it doesn't seem to. The command works, it just doesn't print anything to the pipe until it's finished processing (even though the output is visible on the terminal).

– b1tr4t
Feb 13 at 19:40















You should also (and maybe, only ) force line-buffering on the second instance...

– xenoid
Feb 13 at 20:16





You should also (and maybe, only ) force line-buffering on the second instance...

– xenoid
Feb 13 at 20:16













For some reason it's working more quickly now. Must be a system issue. --line-buffered on first, second or both doesn't seem to make any difference..

– b1tr4t
Feb 14 at 3:12





For some reason it's working more quickly now. Must be a system issue. --line-buffered on first, second or both doesn't seem to make any difference..

– b1tr4t
Feb 14 at 3:12










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1405207%2fgrep-output-is-not-in-stdout-or-stderr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1405207%2fgrep-output-is-not-in-stdout-or-stderr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

Aardman Animations

Are they similar matrix