Lindeberg Condition for a sequence of discrete random variables.
$begingroup$
Let $X_1,X_2,...$ be independent and for any n $ge 1$ and $alpha>0$
$$X_n = left{
begin{array}{rl}
n^alpha & text{with } Pr(X_n= n^alpha) = frac{1}{2n^{2alpha}},\
-n^alpha & text{with }Pr(X_n= -n^alpha) = frac{1}{2n^{2alpha}},\
0 & text{with } Pr(X_n= 0) = 1- frac{1}{n^{2alpha}}.
end{array} right.$$
Let $S_n = X_1+ dots +X_n$ and $B_n^2 = sigma_1^2+dots+sigma_n^2.$ Does $frac{S_n}{B_n}rightarrow Z sim N(0,1)$ in distribution.
Solving this question is an example of using the Lindeberg-Feller CLT. I found that,
$E[X_n]= n^alpha(frac{1}{2n^{2alpha}})-n^alpha(frac{1}{2n^{2alpha}})+0(1-frac{1}{n^{2alpha}}) = 0$
and
$E[X_n^2]=(n^{alpha})^2(frac{1}{2n^{2alpha}}) + (-n^{alpha})^2(frac{1}{2n^{2alpha}})+0^2(1-frac{1}{n^{2alpha}})=1.$
Therefore $sigma_n^2 = 1$ and $B_n = sqrt{n}$.
If the Lindeberg condition holds, i.e., for any $epsilon > 0$
$$lim_{n rightarrow infty} frac{sum_{k=1}^{n} E[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon B_k}}]}{B_n^2} = 0.$$
Then $frac{S_n}{B_n}rightarrow Z sim N(0,1)$ in distribution.
In our case, since $sigma_k=1$ We have to deal with for any $epsilon> 0,$ $sum_{k=1}^{n} E[X_k^2 I_{{frac{|X_k|}{sqrt{k}}>epsilon}}]$ for the numerator. I am stuck now because I dont know how to represent $E[X_k^2 I_{{frac{|X_k|}{sqrt{k}}>epsilon}}]$.
probability probability-theory central-limit-theorem
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $X_1,X_2,...$ be independent and for any n $ge 1$ and $alpha>0$
$$X_n = left{
begin{array}{rl}
n^alpha & text{with } Pr(X_n= n^alpha) = frac{1}{2n^{2alpha}},\
-n^alpha & text{with }Pr(X_n= -n^alpha) = frac{1}{2n^{2alpha}},\
0 & text{with } Pr(X_n= 0) = 1- frac{1}{n^{2alpha}}.
end{array} right.$$
Let $S_n = X_1+ dots +X_n$ and $B_n^2 = sigma_1^2+dots+sigma_n^2.$ Does $frac{S_n}{B_n}rightarrow Z sim N(0,1)$ in distribution.
Solving this question is an example of using the Lindeberg-Feller CLT. I found that,
$E[X_n]= n^alpha(frac{1}{2n^{2alpha}})-n^alpha(frac{1}{2n^{2alpha}})+0(1-frac{1}{n^{2alpha}}) = 0$
and
$E[X_n^2]=(n^{alpha})^2(frac{1}{2n^{2alpha}}) + (-n^{alpha})^2(frac{1}{2n^{2alpha}})+0^2(1-frac{1}{n^{2alpha}})=1.$
Therefore $sigma_n^2 = 1$ and $B_n = sqrt{n}$.
If the Lindeberg condition holds, i.e., for any $epsilon > 0$
$$lim_{n rightarrow infty} frac{sum_{k=1}^{n} E[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon B_k}}]}{B_n^2} = 0.$$
Then $frac{S_n}{B_n}rightarrow Z sim N(0,1)$ in distribution.
In our case, since $sigma_k=1$ We have to deal with for any $epsilon> 0,$ $sum_{k=1}^{n} E[X_k^2 I_{{frac{|X_k|}{sqrt{k}}>epsilon}}]$ for the numerator. I am stuck now because I dont know how to represent $E[X_k^2 I_{{frac{|X_k|}{sqrt{k}}>epsilon}}]$.
probability probability-theory central-limit-theorem
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You messed up the most important part of the condition: $I_{{|X_k|>epsilon B_k}}$ with $B_k$ instead of $sigma_k$ and $B_n^2$ in the denominator instead of $B_n$. This (as well as simpler Lyapunov's condition) will be enough to conclude convergence only if $alpha<1$.
$endgroup$
– A.S.
Mar 9 '16 at 4:08
2
$begingroup$
Correction. Condition is satisfied iff $|X_k|le epsilon sqrt k$ eventually, hence we have convergence iff $alpha<frac 1 2$.
$endgroup$
– A.S.
Mar 9 '16 at 4:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $X_1,X_2,...$ be independent and for any n $ge 1$ and $alpha>0$
$$X_n = left{
begin{array}{rl}
n^alpha & text{with } Pr(X_n= n^alpha) = frac{1}{2n^{2alpha}},\
-n^alpha & text{with }Pr(X_n= -n^alpha) = frac{1}{2n^{2alpha}},\
0 & text{with } Pr(X_n= 0) = 1- frac{1}{n^{2alpha}}.
end{array} right.$$
Let $S_n = X_1+ dots +X_n$ and $B_n^2 = sigma_1^2+dots+sigma_n^2.$ Does $frac{S_n}{B_n}rightarrow Z sim N(0,1)$ in distribution.
Solving this question is an example of using the Lindeberg-Feller CLT. I found that,
$E[X_n]= n^alpha(frac{1}{2n^{2alpha}})-n^alpha(frac{1}{2n^{2alpha}})+0(1-frac{1}{n^{2alpha}}) = 0$
and
$E[X_n^2]=(n^{alpha})^2(frac{1}{2n^{2alpha}}) + (-n^{alpha})^2(frac{1}{2n^{2alpha}})+0^2(1-frac{1}{n^{2alpha}})=1.$
Therefore $sigma_n^2 = 1$ and $B_n = sqrt{n}$.
If the Lindeberg condition holds, i.e., for any $epsilon > 0$
$$lim_{n rightarrow infty} frac{sum_{k=1}^{n} E[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon B_k}}]}{B_n^2} = 0.$$
Then $frac{S_n}{B_n}rightarrow Z sim N(0,1)$ in distribution.
In our case, since $sigma_k=1$ We have to deal with for any $epsilon> 0,$ $sum_{k=1}^{n} E[X_k^2 I_{{frac{|X_k|}{sqrt{k}}>epsilon}}]$ for the numerator. I am stuck now because I dont know how to represent $E[X_k^2 I_{{frac{|X_k|}{sqrt{k}}>epsilon}}]$.
probability probability-theory central-limit-theorem
$endgroup$
Let $X_1,X_2,...$ be independent and for any n $ge 1$ and $alpha>0$
$$X_n = left{
begin{array}{rl}
n^alpha & text{with } Pr(X_n= n^alpha) = frac{1}{2n^{2alpha}},\
-n^alpha & text{with }Pr(X_n= -n^alpha) = frac{1}{2n^{2alpha}},\
0 & text{with } Pr(X_n= 0) = 1- frac{1}{n^{2alpha}}.
end{array} right.$$
Let $S_n = X_1+ dots +X_n$ and $B_n^2 = sigma_1^2+dots+sigma_n^2.$ Does $frac{S_n}{B_n}rightarrow Z sim N(0,1)$ in distribution.
Solving this question is an example of using the Lindeberg-Feller CLT. I found that,
$E[X_n]= n^alpha(frac{1}{2n^{2alpha}})-n^alpha(frac{1}{2n^{2alpha}})+0(1-frac{1}{n^{2alpha}}) = 0$
and
$E[X_n^2]=(n^{alpha})^2(frac{1}{2n^{2alpha}}) + (-n^{alpha})^2(frac{1}{2n^{2alpha}})+0^2(1-frac{1}{n^{2alpha}})=1.$
Therefore $sigma_n^2 = 1$ and $B_n = sqrt{n}$.
If the Lindeberg condition holds, i.e., for any $epsilon > 0$
$$lim_{n rightarrow infty} frac{sum_{k=1}^{n} E[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon B_k}}]}{B_n^2} = 0.$$
Then $frac{S_n}{B_n}rightarrow Z sim N(0,1)$ in distribution.
In our case, since $sigma_k=1$ We have to deal with for any $epsilon> 0,$ $sum_{k=1}^{n} E[X_k^2 I_{{frac{|X_k|}{sqrt{k}}>epsilon}}]$ for the numerator. I am stuck now because I dont know how to represent $E[X_k^2 I_{{frac{|X_k|}{sqrt{k}}>epsilon}}]$.
probability probability-theory central-limit-theorem
probability probability-theory central-limit-theorem
edited Jul 23 '17 at 23:36
Yujie Zha
6,89611729
6,89611729
asked Mar 9 '16 at 3:22
TiffanyButterflyTiffanyButterfly
807
807
1
$begingroup$
You messed up the most important part of the condition: $I_{{|X_k|>epsilon B_k}}$ with $B_k$ instead of $sigma_k$ and $B_n^2$ in the denominator instead of $B_n$. This (as well as simpler Lyapunov's condition) will be enough to conclude convergence only if $alpha<1$.
$endgroup$
– A.S.
Mar 9 '16 at 4:08
2
$begingroup$
Correction. Condition is satisfied iff $|X_k|le epsilon sqrt k$ eventually, hence we have convergence iff $alpha<frac 1 2$.
$endgroup$
– A.S.
Mar 9 '16 at 4:28
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
You messed up the most important part of the condition: $I_{{|X_k|>epsilon B_k}}$ with $B_k$ instead of $sigma_k$ and $B_n^2$ in the denominator instead of $B_n$. This (as well as simpler Lyapunov's condition) will be enough to conclude convergence only if $alpha<1$.
$endgroup$
– A.S.
Mar 9 '16 at 4:08
2
$begingroup$
Correction. Condition is satisfied iff $|X_k|le epsilon sqrt k$ eventually, hence we have convergence iff $alpha<frac 1 2$.
$endgroup$
– A.S.
Mar 9 '16 at 4:28
1
1
$begingroup$
You messed up the most important part of the condition: $I_{{|X_k|>epsilon B_k}}$ with $B_k$ instead of $sigma_k$ and $B_n^2$ in the denominator instead of $B_n$. This (as well as simpler Lyapunov's condition) will be enough to conclude convergence only if $alpha<1$.
$endgroup$
– A.S.
Mar 9 '16 at 4:08
$begingroup$
You messed up the most important part of the condition: $I_{{|X_k|>epsilon B_k}}$ with $B_k$ instead of $sigma_k$ and $B_n^2$ in the denominator instead of $B_n$. This (as well as simpler Lyapunov's condition) will be enough to conclude convergence only if $alpha<1$.
$endgroup$
– A.S.
Mar 9 '16 at 4:08
2
2
$begingroup$
Correction. Condition is satisfied iff $|X_k|le epsilon sqrt k$ eventually, hence we have convergence iff $alpha<frac 1 2$.
$endgroup$
– A.S.
Mar 9 '16 at 4:28
$begingroup$
Correction. Condition is satisfied iff $|X_k|le epsilon sqrt k$ eventually, hence we have convergence iff $alpha<frac 1 2$.
$endgroup$
– A.S.
Mar 9 '16 at 4:28
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The condition we have to check for Lindeberg's condition is thtat for all positive $varepsilon$,
$$
lim_{n rightarrow infty} frac{sum_{k=1}^{n} mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon B_n}}right]}{B_n^2} = 0,
$$
and since $B_n=sqrt n$, this is equivalent to
$$
lim_{n rightarrow infty} frac{sum_{k=1}^{n} mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon sqrt n}}right]}{n} = 0.
$$
If $alphalt 1/2$, then for each fixed $varepsilon$, there exists a $n_0$ such that $n^alphaleqslant varepsilon n^{1/2}$ for all $ngeqslant n_0$ hence
for such $n$, $sum_{k=1}^{n} mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon sqrt n}}right]=0$.
If $alphageqslant 1/2$ and $varepsilonin (0,1)$, the term $mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon sqrt n}}right]$ is zero if $k^alphagt varepsilon sqrt n$, that is , if $kgt varepsilon^{alpha}n^{1/(2alpha)}$ hence
$$
sum_{k=1}^{n} mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon sqrt n}}right]=
sum_{k=1}^{lfloor varepsilon^{alpha}n^{1/(2alpha)}rfloor} mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon sqrt n}}right]
$$
and for $1leqslant kleqslant lfloor varepsilon^{alpha}n^{1/(2alpha)}rfloor$, the term $mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon sqrt n}}right]$ is one hence
$$frac{sum_{k=1}^{n} mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon sqrt n}}right]}{n} =frac 1nlfloor varepsilon^{alpha}n^{1/(2alpha)}rfloor $$
hence Lindeberg's condition holds if and only if $alpha>1/2$.
Since $max_{1 le i le n} sigma_i/ s_n to 0$, Lindeberg's condition is equivalent to the convergence of $left(S_n/b_nright)_n$ to a standard normal distribution.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1689455%2flindeberg-condition-for-a-sequence-of-discrete-random-variables%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The condition we have to check for Lindeberg's condition is thtat for all positive $varepsilon$,
$$
lim_{n rightarrow infty} frac{sum_{k=1}^{n} mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon B_n}}right]}{B_n^2} = 0,
$$
and since $B_n=sqrt n$, this is equivalent to
$$
lim_{n rightarrow infty} frac{sum_{k=1}^{n} mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon sqrt n}}right]}{n} = 0.
$$
If $alphalt 1/2$, then for each fixed $varepsilon$, there exists a $n_0$ such that $n^alphaleqslant varepsilon n^{1/2}$ for all $ngeqslant n_0$ hence
for such $n$, $sum_{k=1}^{n} mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon sqrt n}}right]=0$.
If $alphageqslant 1/2$ and $varepsilonin (0,1)$, the term $mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon sqrt n}}right]$ is zero if $k^alphagt varepsilon sqrt n$, that is , if $kgt varepsilon^{alpha}n^{1/(2alpha)}$ hence
$$
sum_{k=1}^{n} mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon sqrt n}}right]=
sum_{k=1}^{lfloor varepsilon^{alpha}n^{1/(2alpha)}rfloor} mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon sqrt n}}right]
$$
and for $1leqslant kleqslant lfloor varepsilon^{alpha}n^{1/(2alpha)}rfloor$, the term $mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon sqrt n}}right]$ is one hence
$$frac{sum_{k=1}^{n} mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon sqrt n}}right]}{n} =frac 1nlfloor varepsilon^{alpha}n^{1/(2alpha)}rfloor $$
hence Lindeberg's condition holds if and only if $alpha>1/2$.
Since $max_{1 le i le n} sigma_i/ s_n to 0$, Lindeberg's condition is equivalent to the convergence of $left(S_n/b_nright)_n$ to a standard normal distribution.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The condition we have to check for Lindeberg's condition is thtat for all positive $varepsilon$,
$$
lim_{n rightarrow infty} frac{sum_{k=1}^{n} mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon B_n}}right]}{B_n^2} = 0,
$$
and since $B_n=sqrt n$, this is equivalent to
$$
lim_{n rightarrow infty} frac{sum_{k=1}^{n} mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon sqrt n}}right]}{n} = 0.
$$
If $alphalt 1/2$, then for each fixed $varepsilon$, there exists a $n_0$ such that $n^alphaleqslant varepsilon n^{1/2}$ for all $ngeqslant n_0$ hence
for such $n$, $sum_{k=1}^{n} mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon sqrt n}}right]=0$.
If $alphageqslant 1/2$ and $varepsilonin (0,1)$, the term $mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon sqrt n}}right]$ is zero if $k^alphagt varepsilon sqrt n$, that is , if $kgt varepsilon^{alpha}n^{1/(2alpha)}$ hence
$$
sum_{k=1}^{n} mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon sqrt n}}right]=
sum_{k=1}^{lfloor varepsilon^{alpha}n^{1/(2alpha)}rfloor} mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon sqrt n}}right]
$$
and for $1leqslant kleqslant lfloor varepsilon^{alpha}n^{1/(2alpha)}rfloor$, the term $mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon sqrt n}}right]$ is one hence
$$frac{sum_{k=1}^{n} mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon sqrt n}}right]}{n} =frac 1nlfloor varepsilon^{alpha}n^{1/(2alpha)}rfloor $$
hence Lindeberg's condition holds if and only if $alpha>1/2$.
Since $max_{1 le i le n} sigma_i/ s_n to 0$, Lindeberg's condition is equivalent to the convergence of $left(S_n/b_nright)_n$ to a standard normal distribution.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The condition we have to check for Lindeberg's condition is thtat for all positive $varepsilon$,
$$
lim_{n rightarrow infty} frac{sum_{k=1}^{n} mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon B_n}}right]}{B_n^2} = 0,
$$
and since $B_n=sqrt n$, this is equivalent to
$$
lim_{n rightarrow infty} frac{sum_{k=1}^{n} mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon sqrt n}}right]}{n} = 0.
$$
If $alphalt 1/2$, then for each fixed $varepsilon$, there exists a $n_0$ such that $n^alphaleqslant varepsilon n^{1/2}$ for all $ngeqslant n_0$ hence
for such $n$, $sum_{k=1}^{n} mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon sqrt n}}right]=0$.
If $alphageqslant 1/2$ and $varepsilonin (0,1)$, the term $mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon sqrt n}}right]$ is zero if $k^alphagt varepsilon sqrt n$, that is , if $kgt varepsilon^{alpha}n^{1/(2alpha)}$ hence
$$
sum_{k=1}^{n} mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon sqrt n}}right]=
sum_{k=1}^{lfloor varepsilon^{alpha}n^{1/(2alpha)}rfloor} mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon sqrt n}}right]
$$
and for $1leqslant kleqslant lfloor varepsilon^{alpha}n^{1/(2alpha)}rfloor$, the term $mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon sqrt n}}right]$ is one hence
$$frac{sum_{k=1}^{n} mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon sqrt n}}right]}{n} =frac 1nlfloor varepsilon^{alpha}n^{1/(2alpha)}rfloor $$
hence Lindeberg's condition holds if and only if $alpha>1/2$.
Since $max_{1 le i le n} sigma_i/ s_n to 0$, Lindeberg's condition is equivalent to the convergence of $left(S_n/b_nright)_n$ to a standard normal distribution.
$endgroup$
The condition we have to check for Lindeberg's condition is thtat for all positive $varepsilon$,
$$
lim_{n rightarrow infty} frac{sum_{k=1}^{n} mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon B_n}}right]}{B_n^2} = 0,
$$
and since $B_n=sqrt n$, this is equivalent to
$$
lim_{n rightarrow infty} frac{sum_{k=1}^{n} mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon sqrt n}}right]}{n} = 0.
$$
If $alphalt 1/2$, then for each fixed $varepsilon$, there exists a $n_0$ such that $n^alphaleqslant varepsilon n^{1/2}$ for all $ngeqslant n_0$ hence
for such $n$, $sum_{k=1}^{n} mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon sqrt n}}right]=0$.
If $alphageqslant 1/2$ and $varepsilonin (0,1)$, the term $mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon sqrt n}}right]$ is zero if $k^alphagt varepsilon sqrt n$, that is , if $kgt varepsilon^{alpha}n^{1/(2alpha)}$ hence
$$
sum_{k=1}^{n} mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon sqrt n}}right]=
sum_{k=1}^{lfloor varepsilon^{alpha}n^{1/(2alpha)}rfloor} mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon sqrt n}}right]
$$
and for $1leqslant kleqslant lfloor varepsilon^{alpha}n^{1/(2alpha)}rfloor$, the term $mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon sqrt n}}right]$ is one hence
$$frac{sum_{k=1}^{n} mathbb Eleft[X_k^2 I_{{|X_k|>epsilon sqrt n}}right]}{n} =frac 1nlfloor varepsilon^{alpha}n^{1/(2alpha)}rfloor $$
hence Lindeberg's condition holds if and only if $alpha>1/2$.
Since $max_{1 le i le n} sigma_i/ s_n to 0$, Lindeberg's condition is equivalent to the convergence of $left(S_n/b_nright)_n$ to a standard normal distribution.
answered Dec 13 '18 at 11:07
Davide GiraudoDavide Giraudo
126k16151263
126k16151263
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1689455%2flindeberg-condition-for-a-sequence-of-discrete-random-variables%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
You messed up the most important part of the condition: $I_{{|X_k|>epsilon B_k}}$ with $B_k$ instead of $sigma_k$ and $B_n^2$ in the denominator instead of $B_n$. This (as well as simpler Lyapunov's condition) will be enough to conclude convergence only if $alpha<1$.
$endgroup$
– A.S.
Mar 9 '16 at 4:08
2
$begingroup$
Correction. Condition is satisfied iff $|X_k|le epsilon sqrt k$ eventually, hence we have convergence iff $alpha<frac 1 2$.
$endgroup$
– A.S.
Mar 9 '16 at 4:28