Computation of partial fraction decomposition
$begingroup$
Suppose the polynomial $Q(x)$ be $$Q(x)=(x-alpha_1)(x-alpha_2) cdots (x-alpha_{n+1})$$, where $alpha_1, alpha_2, cdots , alpha_{n+1}$ are distinct real numbers and $n in mathbb{N}$. Show that if $P(x)$ is a polynomial with degree less than $n+1$ then
$$frac{P(x)}{Q(x)}=sum^{n+1}_{k=1}frac{P(alpha_k)}{Q'(alpha_k)(x-alpha_k)},$$
where $Q'(x)$ is the derivative of the polynomial $Q(x)$.
The generalisation of partial fractions decomposition is strongly related to Lagrange polynomial, should I start proving Lagrange polynomial before the statement above? Or I should have another approach to prove this?
real-analysis derivatives
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose the polynomial $Q(x)$ be $$Q(x)=(x-alpha_1)(x-alpha_2) cdots (x-alpha_{n+1})$$, where $alpha_1, alpha_2, cdots , alpha_{n+1}$ are distinct real numbers and $n in mathbb{N}$. Show that if $P(x)$ is a polynomial with degree less than $n+1$ then
$$frac{P(x)}{Q(x)}=sum^{n+1}_{k=1}frac{P(alpha_k)}{Q'(alpha_k)(x-alpha_k)},$$
where $Q'(x)$ is the derivative of the polynomial $Q(x)$.
The generalisation of partial fractions decomposition is strongly related to Lagrange polynomial, should I start proving Lagrange polynomial before the statement above? Or I should have another approach to prove this?
real-analysis derivatives
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose the polynomial $Q(x)$ be $$Q(x)=(x-alpha_1)(x-alpha_2) cdots (x-alpha_{n+1})$$, where $alpha_1, alpha_2, cdots , alpha_{n+1}$ are distinct real numbers and $n in mathbb{N}$. Show that if $P(x)$ is a polynomial with degree less than $n+1$ then
$$frac{P(x)}{Q(x)}=sum^{n+1}_{k=1}frac{P(alpha_k)}{Q'(alpha_k)(x-alpha_k)},$$
where $Q'(x)$ is the derivative of the polynomial $Q(x)$.
The generalisation of partial fractions decomposition is strongly related to Lagrange polynomial, should I start proving Lagrange polynomial before the statement above? Or I should have another approach to prove this?
real-analysis derivatives
$endgroup$
Suppose the polynomial $Q(x)$ be $$Q(x)=(x-alpha_1)(x-alpha_2) cdots (x-alpha_{n+1})$$, where $alpha_1, alpha_2, cdots , alpha_{n+1}$ are distinct real numbers and $n in mathbb{N}$. Show that if $P(x)$ is a polynomial with degree less than $n+1$ then
$$frac{P(x)}{Q(x)}=sum^{n+1}_{k=1}frac{P(alpha_k)}{Q'(alpha_k)(x-alpha_k)},$$
where $Q'(x)$ is the derivative of the polynomial $Q(x)$.
The generalisation of partial fractions decomposition is strongly related to Lagrange polynomial, should I start proving Lagrange polynomial before the statement above? Or I should have another approach to prove this?
real-analysis derivatives
real-analysis derivatives
edited Dec 13 '18 at 14:47
David C. Ullrich
60.9k43994
60.9k43994
asked Dec 13 '18 at 14:09
weilam06weilam06
9511
9511
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Two polynomials of degree $n$ are equal if they have the same values at $n+1$ distinct points. Multiply RHS and LHS of your equation by $Q(x)$ and compute the obtained LHS and RHS at any $alpha_j$. If LHS($alpha_j$)=RHS($alpha_j$) are the same for all $j=1,...,n+1$ then the equality is true. Do not forget that
$$
(prod_{j=1}^{n+1}(x-alpha_j))'=sum_{j=1}^{n+1}prod_{ineq j}(x-alpha_i).
$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
So I have to make $r(x)=P(x)-sum^{n+1}_{k=1}frac{alpha_k}{Q'(alpha_k)(x-alpha_k)} cdot Q(x)=0$ holds true for all $alpha_k$, where $k=1,2, cdots, n+1$. Prove that $r(x)$ with degree $n$ has $n+1$ roots, concludes that $r(x)$ must be a zero polynomial, i.e. $r(x)=0$, so the conclusion follows?
$endgroup$
– weilam06
Dec 13 '18 at 14:55
$begingroup$
Yes! If a polynomial of degree $n$ has at least $n+1$ roots then it is $0$. Just a remark: put $P(alpha_k)$ instead of $alpha_k$ in the numerator in your comment.
$endgroup$
– AAK
Dec 13 '18 at 18:10
$begingroup$
Oh okay, I have mistyped it. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– weilam06
Dec 14 '18 at 8:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
hint
The decomposition gives
$$frac{P(x)}{Q(x)}=sum_{k=1}^{n+1}frac{A_k}{(x-alpha_k)}$$
with
$$A_k=lim_{xtoalpha_k}frac{P(x)(x-alpha_k)}{Q(x)}$$
and
$$Q'(alpha_k)=lim_{xtoalpha_k}frac{Q(x)-0}{x-alpha_k}.$$
You can take it.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I don't understand how to relate with MVT.
$endgroup$
– weilam06
Dec 14 '18 at 2:46
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3038046%2fcomputation-of-partial-fraction-decomposition%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Two polynomials of degree $n$ are equal if they have the same values at $n+1$ distinct points. Multiply RHS and LHS of your equation by $Q(x)$ and compute the obtained LHS and RHS at any $alpha_j$. If LHS($alpha_j$)=RHS($alpha_j$) are the same for all $j=1,...,n+1$ then the equality is true. Do not forget that
$$
(prod_{j=1}^{n+1}(x-alpha_j))'=sum_{j=1}^{n+1}prod_{ineq j}(x-alpha_i).
$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
So I have to make $r(x)=P(x)-sum^{n+1}_{k=1}frac{alpha_k}{Q'(alpha_k)(x-alpha_k)} cdot Q(x)=0$ holds true for all $alpha_k$, where $k=1,2, cdots, n+1$. Prove that $r(x)$ with degree $n$ has $n+1$ roots, concludes that $r(x)$ must be a zero polynomial, i.e. $r(x)=0$, so the conclusion follows?
$endgroup$
– weilam06
Dec 13 '18 at 14:55
$begingroup$
Yes! If a polynomial of degree $n$ has at least $n+1$ roots then it is $0$. Just a remark: put $P(alpha_k)$ instead of $alpha_k$ in the numerator in your comment.
$endgroup$
– AAK
Dec 13 '18 at 18:10
$begingroup$
Oh okay, I have mistyped it. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– weilam06
Dec 14 '18 at 8:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Two polynomials of degree $n$ are equal if they have the same values at $n+1$ distinct points. Multiply RHS and LHS of your equation by $Q(x)$ and compute the obtained LHS and RHS at any $alpha_j$. If LHS($alpha_j$)=RHS($alpha_j$) are the same for all $j=1,...,n+1$ then the equality is true. Do not forget that
$$
(prod_{j=1}^{n+1}(x-alpha_j))'=sum_{j=1}^{n+1}prod_{ineq j}(x-alpha_i).
$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
So I have to make $r(x)=P(x)-sum^{n+1}_{k=1}frac{alpha_k}{Q'(alpha_k)(x-alpha_k)} cdot Q(x)=0$ holds true for all $alpha_k$, where $k=1,2, cdots, n+1$. Prove that $r(x)$ with degree $n$ has $n+1$ roots, concludes that $r(x)$ must be a zero polynomial, i.e. $r(x)=0$, so the conclusion follows?
$endgroup$
– weilam06
Dec 13 '18 at 14:55
$begingroup$
Yes! If a polynomial of degree $n$ has at least $n+1$ roots then it is $0$. Just a remark: put $P(alpha_k)$ instead of $alpha_k$ in the numerator in your comment.
$endgroup$
– AAK
Dec 13 '18 at 18:10
$begingroup$
Oh okay, I have mistyped it. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– weilam06
Dec 14 '18 at 8:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Two polynomials of degree $n$ are equal if they have the same values at $n+1$ distinct points. Multiply RHS and LHS of your equation by $Q(x)$ and compute the obtained LHS and RHS at any $alpha_j$. If LHS($alpha_j$)=RHS($alpha_j$) are the same for all $j=1,...,n+1$ then the equality is true. Do not forget that
$$
(prod_{j=1}^{n+1}(x-alpha_j))'=sum_{j=1}^{n+1}prod_{ineq j}(x-alpha_i).
$$
$endgroup$
Two polynomials of degree $n$ are equal if they have the same values at $n+1$ distinct points. Multiply RHS and LHS of your equation by $Q(x)$ and compute the obtained LHS and RHS at any $alpha_j$. If LHS($alpha_j$)=RHS($alpha_j$) are the same for all $j=1,...,n+1$ then the equality is true. Do not forget that
$$
(prod_{j=1}^{n+1}(x-alpha_j))'=sum_{j=1}^{n+1}prod_{ineq j}(x-alpha_i).
$$
answered Dec 13 '18 at 14:30
AAKAAK
365
365
$begingroup$
So I have to make $r(x)=P(x)-sum^{n+1}_{k=1}frac{alpha_k}{Q'(alpha_k)(x-alpha_k)} cdot Q(x)=0$ holds true for all $alpha_k$, where $k=1,2, cdots, n+1$. Prove that $r(x)$ with degree $n$ has $n+1$ roots, concludes that $r(x)$ must be a zero polynomial, i.e. $r(x)=0$, so the conclusion follows?
$endgroup$
– weilam06
Dec 13 '18 at 14:55
$begingroup$
Yes! If a polynomial of degree $n$ has at least $n+1$ roots then it is $0$. Just a remark: put $P(alpha_k)$ instead of $alpha_k$ in the numerator in your comment.
$endgroup$
– AAK
Dec 13 '18 at 18:10
$begingroup$
Oh okay, I have mistyped it. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– weilam06
Dec 14 '18 at 8:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So I have to make $r(x)=P(x)-sum^{n+1}_{k=1}frac{alpha_k}{Q'(alpha_k)(x-alpha_k)} cdot Q(x)=0$ holds true for all $alpha_k$, where $k=1,2, cdots, n+1$. Prove that $r(x)$ with degree $n$ has $n+1$ roots, concludes that $r(x)$ must be a zero polynomial, i.e. $r(x)=0$, so the conclusion follows?
$endgroup$
– weilam06
Dec 13 '18 at 14:55
$begingroup$
Yes! If a polynomial of degree $n$ has at least $n+1$ roots then it is $0$. Just a remark: put $P(alpha_k)$ instead of $alpha_k$ in the numerator in your comment.
$endgroup$
– AAK
Dec 13 '18 at 18:10
$begingroup$
Oh okay, I have mistyped it. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– weilam06
Dec 14 '18 at 8:36
$begingroup$
So I have to make $r(x)=P(x)-sum^{n+1}_{k=1}frac{alpha_k}{Q'(alpha_k)(x-alpha_k)} cdot Q(x)=0$ holds true for all $alpha_k$, where $k=1,2, cdots, n+1$. Prove that $r(x)$ with degree $n$ has $n+1$ roots, concludes that $r(x)$ must be a zero polynomial, i.e. $r(x)=0$, so the conclusion follows?
$endgroup$
– weilam06
Dec 13 '18 at 14:55
$begingroup$
So I have to make $r(x)=P(x)-sum^{n+1}_{k=1}frac{alpha_k}{Q'(alpha_k)(x-alpha_k)} cdot Q(x)=0$ holds true for all $alpha_k$, where $k=1,2, cdots, n+1$. Prove that $r(x)$ with degree $n$ has $n+1$ roots, concludes that $r(x)$ must be a zero polynomial, i.e. $r(x)=0$, so the conclusion follows?
$endgroup$
– weilam06
Dec 13 '18 at 14:55
$begingroup$
Yes! If a polynomial of degree $n$ has at least $n+1$ roots then it is $0$. Just a remark: put $P(alpha_k)$ instead of $alpha_k$ in the numerator in your comment.
$endgroup$
– AAK
Dec 13 '18 at 18:10
$begingroup$
Yes! If a polynomial of degree $n$ has at least $n+1$ roots then it is $0$. Just a remark: put $P(alpha_k)$ instead of $alpha_k$ in the numerator in your comment.
$endgroup$
– AAK
Dec 13 '18 at 18:10
$begingroup$
Oh okay, I have mistyped it. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– weilam06
Dec 14 '18 at 8:36
$begingroup$
Oh okay, I have mistyped it. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– weilam06
Dec 14 '18 at 8:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
hint
The decomposition gives
$$frac{P(x)}{Q(x)}=sum_{k=1}^{n+1}frac{A_k}{(x-alpha_k)}$$
with
$$A_k=lim_{xtoalpha_k}frac{P(x)(x-alpha_k)}{Q(x)}$$
and
$$Q'(alpha_k)=lim_{xtoalpha_k}frac{Q(x)-0}{x-alpha_k}.$$
You can take it.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I don't understand how to relate with MVT.
$endgroup$
– weilam06
Dec 14 '18 at 2:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
hint
The decomposition gives
$$frac{P(x)}{Q(x)}=sum_{k=1}^{n+1}frac{A_k}{(x-alpha_k)}$$
with
$$A_k=lim_{xtoalpha_k}frac{P(x)(x-alpha_k)}{Q(x)}$$
and
$$Q'(alpha_k)=lim_{xtoalpha_k}frac{Q(x)-0}{x-alpha_k}.$$
You can take it.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I don't understand how to relate with MVT.
$endgroup$
– weilam06
Dec 14 '18 at 2:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
hint
The decomposition gives
$$frac{P(x)}{Q(x)}=sum_{k=1}^{n+1}frac{A_k}{(x-alpha_k)}$$
with
$$A_k=lim_{xtoalpha_k}frac{P(x)(x-alpha_k)}{Q(x)}$$
and
$$Q'(alpha_k)=lim_{xtoalpha_k}frac{Q(x)-0}{x-alpha_k}.$$
You can take it.
$endgroup$
hint
The decomposition gives
$$frac{P(x)}{Q(x)}=sum_{k=1}^{n+1}frac{A_k}{(x-alpha_k)}$$
with
$$A_k=lim_{xtoalpha_k}frac{P(x)(x-alpha_k)}{Q(x)}$$
and
$$Q'(alpha_k)=lim_{xtoalpha_k}frac{Q(x)-0}{x-alpha_k}.$$
You can take it.
answered Dec 13 '18 at 14:27
hamam_Abdallahhamam_Abdallah
38.1k21634
38.1k21634
$begingroup$
I don't understand how to relate with MVT.
$endgroup$
– weilam06
Dec 14 '18 at 2:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I don't understand how to relate with MVT.
$endgroup$
– weilam06
Dec 14 '18 at 2:46
$begingroup$
I don't understand how to relate with MVT.
$endgroup$
– weilam06
Dec 14 '18 at 2:46
$begingroup$
I don't understand how to relate with MVT.
$endgroup$
– weilam06
Dec 14 '18 at 2:46
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3038046%2fcomputation-of-partial-fraction-decomposition%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown