Fix setuid and setgid bits in /usr?
I did something stupid:
chown -R root:root /usr
chmod -R g-w /usr
Apparently, the best thing I can do is reinstall the system. However, my system works fine so far - is there anything immediately dangerous not fixing this asap? I have Ubuntu 18.04 (no Internet connection), it is just used as a local NAS.
The reason I did this was due to a warning when doing updates:
WARN: uid is 0 but '/usr' is owned by 1000
WARN: /usr is group writable!
I asked and someone in a forum suggested the above commands with "it is perfectly safe". Lesson learned: Don't trust people on the Internet, even if they sound totally convinced.
The reason, apparently, why /usr was group writable and not owned by root is because of my specific DIY-Nas Ubuntu (Odroid):
drwxrwxr-x 10 odroid odroid 4096 Apr 12 2018 usr
Perhaps I should have not used the -R recursive option. It doesn't matter now.
The last few hours, I looked through various posts to find out what I did. It looks like running any chown on /usr breaks setuid and setgid bits, so I would need to manually compare to an existing system to restore all of those once I have fix the ownership again. For fixing sudo command, I already did this:
chown root:root /usr/bin/sudo && chmod 4755 /usr/bin/sudo
Besides this, I don't see any more problems. When I log in to Ubuntu interface, I get a permission warning from some Bluetooth Software, but it is not immidiatly relevant.
I understand that there is some software in /usr that has a group other than root (see list here, for example), for reasons of security - but will there be any really negative effects on my nas-system, especially related to file handling/archive things, e.g. corrupted or inaccessible files?
Note that I created a new stackexchange account because I am too embarrassed.. anyway, many thanks for suggestions!
permissions root chmod chown
add a comment |
I did something stupid:
chown -R root:root /usr
chmod -R g-w /usr
Apparently, the best thing I can do is reinstall the system. However, my system works fine so far - is there anything immediately dangerous not fixing this asap? I have Ubuntu 18.04 (no Internet connection), it is just used as a local NAS.
The reason I did this was due to a warning when doing updates:
WARN: uid is 0 but '/usr' is owned by 1000
WARN: /usr is group writable!
I asked and someone in a forum suggested the above commands with "it is perfectly safe". Lesson learned: Don't trust people on the Internet, even if they sound totally convinced.
The reason, apparently, why /usr was group writable and not owned by root is because of my specific DIY-Nas Ubuntu (Odroid):
drwxrwxr-x 10 odroid odroid 4096 Apr 12 2018 usr
Perhaps I should have not used the -R recursive option. It doesn't matter now.
The last few hours, I looked through various posts to find out what I did. It looks like running any chown on /usr breaks setuid and setgid bits, so I would need to manually compare to an existing system to restore all of those once I have fix the ownership again. For fixing sudo command, I already did this:
chown root:root /usr/bin/sudo && chmod 4755 /usr/bin/sudo
Besides this, I don't see any more problems. When I log in to Ubuntu interface, I get a permission warning from some Bluetooth Software, but it is not immidiatly relevant.
I understand that there is some software in /usr that has a group other than root (see list here, for example), for reasons of security - but will there be any really negative effects on my nas-system, especially related to file handling/archive things, e.g. corrupted or inaccessible files?
Note that I created a new stackexchange account because I am too embarrassed.. anyway, many thanks for suggestions!
permissions root chmod chown
add a comment |
I did something stupid:
chown -R root:root /usr
chmod -R g-w /usr
Apparently, the best thing I can do is reinstall the system. However, my system works fine so far - is there anything immediately dangerous not fixing this asap? I have Ubuntu 18.04 (no Internet connection), it is just used as a local NAS.
The reason I did this was due to a warning when doing updates:
WARN: uid is 0 but '/usr' is owned by 1000
WARN: /usr is group writable!
I asked and someone in a forum suggested the above commands with "it is perfectly safe". Lesson learned: Don't trust people on the Internet, even if they sound totally convinced.
The reason, apparently, why /usr was group writable and not owned by root is because of my specific DIY-Nas Ubuntu (Odroid):
drwxrwxr-x 10 odroid odroid 4096 Apr 12 2018 usr
Perhaps I should have not used the -R recursive option. It doesn't matter now.
The last few hours, I looked through various posts to find out what I did. It looks like running any chown on /usr breaks setuid and setgid bits, so I would need to manually compare to an existing system to restore all of those once I have fix the ownership again. For fixing sudo command, I already did this:
chown root:root /usr/bin/sudo && chmod 4755 /usr/bin/sudo
Besides this, I don't see any more problems. When I log in to Ubuntu interface, I get a permission warning from some Bluetooth Software, but it is not immidiatly relevant.
I understand that there is some software in /usr that has a group other than root (see list here, for example), for reasons of security - but will there be any really negative effects on my nas-system, especially related to file handling/archive things, e.g. corrupted or inaccessible files?
Note that I created a new stackexchange account because I am too embarrassed.. anyway, many thanks for suggestions!
permissions root chmod chown
I did something stupid:
chown -R root:root /usr
chmod -R g-w /usr
Apparently, the best thing I can do is reinstall the system. However, my system works fine so far - is there anything immediately dangerous not fixing this asap? I have Ubuntu 18.04 (no Internet connection), it is just used as a local NAS.
The reason I did this was due to a warning when doing updates:
WARN: uid is 0 but '/usr' is owned by 1000
WARN: /usr is group writable!
I asked and someone in a forum suggested the above commands with "it is perfectly safe". Lesson learned: Don't trust people on the Internet, even if they sound totally convinced.
The reason, apparently, why /usr was group writable and not owned by root is because of my specific DIY-Nas Ubuntu (Odroid):
drwxrwxr-x 10 odroid odroid 4096 Apr 12 2018 usr
Perhaps I should have not used the -R recursive option. It doesn't matter now.
The last few hours, I looked through various posts to find out what I did. It looks like running any chown on /usr breaks setuid and setgid bits, so I would need to manually compare to an existing system to restore all of those once I have fix the ownership again. For fixing sudo command, I already did this:
chown root:root /usr/bin/sudo && chmod 4755 /usr/bin/sudo
Besides this, I don't see any more problems. When I log in to Ubuntu interface, I get a permission warning from some Bluetooth Software, but it is not immidiatly relevant.
I understand that there is some software in /usr that has a group other than root (see list here, for example), for reasons of security - but will there be any really negative effects on my nas-system, especially related to file handling/archive things, e.g. corrupted or inaccessible files?
Note that I created a new stackexchange account because I am too embarrassed.. anyway, many thanks for suggestions!
permissions root chmod chown
permissions root chmod chown
edited Dec 8 '18 at 16:18
Helmut
asked Dec 8 '18 at 14:07
HelmutHelmut
534
534
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
I think you were lucky because you just removed the "writable" bit for groups.
This won't affect the SETGID or SETUID bits. If they were set before, they are
still set. The command chmod -R 777 /usr on the other hand resets all bits
to rwx while removing any other bits at the same time, including the s bits.
This is why people who issued chmod -R 777 /usr are usually forced to do
a re-install.
Maybe the observations I made on my system can help you. I have run some find commands to see which
files and directories would have been affected by the commands you issued. Here are the results:
# Find all files and directories NOT owned by user root:
find usr -not -user root -ls
3407926 52 -rwsr-sr-x 1 daemon daemon 51464 Feb 20 2018 usr/bin/at
# Find all files and directories NOT owned by group root:
find usr -not -group root -ls
3418319 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6
3418322 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages
3419229 4 drwxrwsr-x 4 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7
3419230 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 26 2018 usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages
1049153 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages
3544477 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/fonts
3418324 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs
3544479 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp
3416934 372 -rwsr-xr-- 1 root dip 378600 Jun 12 19:20 usr/sbin/pppd
3410196 40 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 39000 Apr 3 2018 usr/sbin/ssmtp
3408208 12 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root utmp 10232 Mär 11 2016 usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/utempter/utempter
3419827 12 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root tty 10232 Aug 4 2017 usr/lib/mc/cons.saver
3428536 16 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 14336 Jul 31 16:14 usr/lib/evolution/camel-lock-helper-1.2
3416858 44 -rwsr-xr-- 1 root messagebus 42992 Nov 15 2017 usr/lib/dbus-1.0/dbus-daemon-launch-helper
1183416 4 drwxrwsr-t 2 root lpadmin 4096 Nov 8 2017 usr/share/ppd/custom
3410118 44 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mlocate 43088 Mär 1 2018 usr/bin/mlocate
3408029 16 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root tty 14328 Jan 17 2018 usr/bin/bsd-write
3414379 356 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root ssh 362640 Nov 5 12:51 usr/bin/ssh-agent
3410676 32 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root tty 30800 Jul 26 18:20 usr/bin/wall
3409008 72 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root shadow 71816 Jan 25 2018 usr/bin/chage
3416771 24 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root shadow 22808 Jan 25 2018 usr/bin/expiry
3407926 52 -rwsr-sr-x 1 daemon daemon 51464 Feb 20 2018 usr/bin/at
3409356 40 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root crontab 39352 Nov 16 2017 usr/bin/crontab
# find objects that have the group-writable bit set and are owned by user=root but group!=root:
find usr -perm -0020 -user root -not -group root -ls
3418319 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6
3418322 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages
3419229 4 drwxrwsr-x 4 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7
3419230 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 26 2018 usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages
1049153 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages
3544477 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/fonts
3418324 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs
3544479 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp
1183416 4 drwxrwsr-t 2 root lpadmin 4096 Nov 8 2017 usr/share/ppd/custom
Of course, your mileage may vary have varied but I'm confident that
you only "broke" a handful of files. The vast majority of objects below
/usr are owned by root:root and usually have either rwxrwxr-x
or rwxr-xr-x. Removing the g-w bit doesn't really do harm because it
removes the writeable bit for the group root but (at least on my standard
system) the only member of that group is the user root anyway and he has
write access via the user permissions (which you didn't change) and doesn't
really need write access via group membership.
Btw, my /usr itself has the following attributes:
drwxr-xr-x 10 root root 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/
Update
The OP mentions he faced the error
sudo: /usr/bin/sudo must be owned by uid 0 and have the setuid bit set
after issuing chmod g-w and chown root:root and had to fix it with
chmod 4755 /usr/bin/sudo. As it turns out, the chown g-w indeed
does NOT change the setuid bit but the chown root:root did.
It apparently clears those SETUID (and presumably also the SETGID and
STICKY) bits. To me, this is unexpected behaviour but I'm pretty sure
there's an explanation and/or reason. However. I ran another find
command to see which of my files below /usr have one or more of
SETUID, SETGID, and STICKY bits set:
find usr -perm /7000 -printf '%Mt%u:%gt%pn'
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python3.6
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python2.7
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/share/fonts
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/share/emacs
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp
-rwsr-xr-- root:dip usr/sbin/pppd
-rwxr-sr-x root:mail usr/sbin/ssmtp
-rwxr-sr-x root:utmp usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/utempter/utempter
-rwsr-sr-x root:root usr/lib/xorg/Xorg.wrap
-rwxr-sr-x root:tty usr/lib/mc/cons.saver
-rwsr-sr-x root:root usr/lib/snapd/snap-confine
-rwxr-sr-x root:mail usr/lib/evolution/camel-lock-helper-1.2
-rwsr-xr-- root:messagebus usr/lib/dbus-1.0/dbus-daemon-launch-helper
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/lib/openssh/ssh-keysign
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/lib/policykit-1/polkit-agent-helper-1
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/lib/eject/dmcrypt-get-device
drwxrwsr-t root:lpadmin usr/share/ppd/custom
-rwxr-sr-x root:mlocate usr/bin/mlocate
-rwxr-sr-x root:tty usr/bin/bsd-write
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/traceroute6.iputils
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/gpasswd
-rwxr-sr-x root:ssh usr/bin/ssh-agent
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/passwd
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/pkexec
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/sudo
-rwxr-sr-x root:tty usr/bin/wall
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/chfn
-rwxr-sr-x root:shadow usr/bin/chage
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/arping
-rwxr-sr-x root:shadow usr/bin/expiry
-rwsr-sr-x daemon:daemon usr/bin/at
-rwxr-sr-x root:crontab usr/bin/crontab
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/chsh
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/newgrp
This list is not very long but it still contains some files I'd
consider crucial. Especially those in the last third, like passwd,
crontab, etc., and of course sudo.
Many thanks for the effort to list those files! I will investigate a bit more, change those groups-settings and oberserve if anything still appears strange. Thank you also for your explanation, which is even more helpful. However, what I don't understand: if the removing the writable bits for groups doesn't affect won't affect the SETGID or SETUID bits, why did I have problems with my sudo command, that issudo: /usr/bin/sudo must be owned by uid 0 and have the setuid bit set? See here
– Helmut
Dec 8 '18 at 16:14
@Helmut Oh. I just tried, you are right. I stand corrected. I opened a terminal and didsudo -ito get a root shell. Then I didchown root:root /usr/bin/sudoand indeed, the setuid bit has gone andsudois broken :-( The setuid bit isn't removed by thechmod g-wbut by thechown. I'm afraid my whole answer has proved wrong now.
– PerlDuck
Dec 8 '18 at 16:34
@Helmut I updated my post and added "my" SETUID/SETGID files. I'm not satisfied with my answer, though. Maybe I'll remove it because it is not a real answer but rather a list of files that would have been affected on my personal installation and yours is likely to be different.
– PerlDuck
Dec 8 '18 at 17:30
1
I think it really helps, please leave it. Changing those owners back won't solve all my problems, but I might survive until I can reinstall the system in a couple of weeks! - I removed the "correct answer" selection, nonetheless this is perhaps the only answer that can be given under my circumstances.
– Helmut
Dec 8 '18 at 17:36
@Helmut Ok. :-) Good to hear it helped you at least a bit. I think the most important thing is thesudocommand. If that works, everything else can be recovered.
– PerlDuck
Dec 8 '18 at 17:38
|
show 2 more comments
I think the above answer from @PerlDuck explains most crucial things. After working through each file manually, I think I removed the largest mess. If this computer would have been exposed to the internet, I would have reinstalled right away - now I have some more time.
Anyway, I want to add a link to a complete list of Linux default permissions here:
https://www.vidarholen.net/contents/junk/ubuntu_permissions.html This also helped me restore a number of additional file permissions.
1
Great finding. But the link you show tells e.g. for thesudocommand:chmod 4755 /usr/bin/sudo; chown root:root /usr/bin/sudo. As we both just learned, thechownundoes thechmod 4xxx(removes the special bits). It's better to swap the two commands, i.e.chownfirst and thenchmod. Nonetheless, that list is good. I'd first dogrep -E 'chown.*/usr'and thengrep -E 'chmod.*/usr'(or similar, untested) in your case and run the results in that order.
– PerlDuck
Dec 8 '18 at 19:41
1
Yes, totally true! I didn't actually follow this order, just looked up information for some links. Thanks for mentioning this. Also: I find doingchmod g+s /file/thatneeds/setgidandchmod u+s /file/thatneeds/setuidboth more legible and less dangerous for typos.
– Helmut
Dec 9 '18 at 5:50
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1099381%2ffix-setuid-and-setgid-bits-in-usr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I think you were lucky because you just removed the "writable" bit for groups.
This won't affect the SETGID or SETUID bits. If they were set before, they are
still set. The command chmod -R 777 /usr on the other hand resets all bits
to rwx while removing any other bits at the same time, including the s bits.
This is why people who issued chmod -R 777 /usr are usually forced to do
a re-install.
Maybe the observations I made on my system can help you. I have run some find commands to see which
files and directories would have been affected by the commands you issued. Here are the results:
# Find all files and directories NOT owned by user root:
find usr -not -user root -ls
3407926 52 -rwsr-sr-x 1 daemon daemon 51464 Feb 20 2018 usr/bin/at
# Find all files and directories NOT owned by group root:
find usr -not -group root -ls
3418319 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6
3418322 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages
3419229 4 drwxrwsr-x 4 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7
3419230 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 26 2018 usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages
1049153 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages
3544477 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/fonts
3418324 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs
3544479 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp
3416934 372 -rwsr-xr-- 1 root dip 378600 Jun 12 19:20 usr/sbin/pppd
3410196 40 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 39000 Apr 3 2018 usr/sbin/ssmtp
3408208 12 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root utmp 10232 Mär 11 2016 usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/utempter/utempter
3419827 12 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root tty 10232 Aug 4 2017 usr/lib/mc/cons.saver
3428536 16 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 14336 Jul 31 16:14 usr/lib/evolution/camel-lock-helper-1.2
3416858 44 -rwsr-xr-- 1 root messagebus 42992 Nov 15 2017 usr/lib/dbus-1.0/dbus-daemon-launch-helper
1183416 4 drwxrwsr-t 2 root lpadmin 4096 Nov 8 2017 usr/share/ppd/custom
3410118 44 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mlocate 43088 Mär 1 2018 usr/bin/mlocate
3408029 16 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root tty 14328 Jan 17 2018 usr/bin/bsd-write
3414379 356 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root ssh 362640 Nov 5 12:51 usr/bin/ssh-agent
3410676 32 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root tty 30800 Jul 26 18:20 usr/bin/wall
3409008 72 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root shadow 71816 Jan 25 2018 usr/bin/chage
3416771 24 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root shadow 22808 Jan 25 2018 usr/bin/expiry
3407926 52 -rwsr-sr-x 1 daemon daemon 51464 Feb 20 2018 usr/bin/at
3409356 40 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root crontab 39352 Nov 16 2017 usr/bin/crontab
# find objects that have the group-writable bit set and are owned by user=root but group!=root:
find usr -perm -0020 -user root -not -group root -ls
3418319 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6
3418322 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages
3419229 4 drwxrwsr-x 4 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7
3419230 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 26 2018 usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages
1049153 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages
3544477 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/fonts
3418324 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs
3544479 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp
1183416 4 drwxrwsr-t 2 root lpadmin 4096 Nov 8 2017 usr/share/ppd/custom
Of course, your mileage may vary have varied but I'm confident that
you only "broke" a handful of files. The vast majority of objects below
/usr are owned by root:root and usually have either rwxrwxr-x
or rwxr-xr-x. Removing the g-w bit doesn't really do harm because it
removes the writeable bit for the group root but (at least on my standard
system) the only member of that group is the user root anyway and he has
write access via the user permissions (which you didn't change) and doesn't
really need write access via group membership.
Btw, my /usr itself has the following attributes:
drwxr-xr-x 10 root root 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/
Update
The OP mentions he faced the error
sudo: /usr/bin/sudo must be owned by uid 0 and have the setuid bit set
after issuing chmod g-w and chown root:root and had to fix it with
chmod 4755 /usr/bin/sudo. As it turns out, the chown g-w indeed
does NOT change the setuid bit but the chown root:root did.
It apparently clears those SETUID (and presumably also the SETGID and
STICKY) bits. To me, this is unexpected behaviour but I'm pretty sure
there's an explanation and/or reason. However. I ran another find
command to see which of my files below /usr have one or more of
SETUID, SETGID, and STICKY bits set:
find usr -perm /7000 -printf '%Mt%u:%gt%pn'
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python3.6
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python2.7
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/share/fonts
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/share/emacs
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp
-rwsr-xr-- root:dip usr/sbin/pppd
-rwxr-sr-x root:mail usr/sbin/ssmtp
-rwxr-sr-x root:utmp usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/utempter/utempter
-rwsr-sr-x root:root usr/lib/xorg/Xorg.wrap
-rwxr-sr-x root:tty usr/lib/mc/cons.saver
-rwsr-sr-x root:root usr/lib/snapd/snap-confine
-rwxr-sr-x root:mail usr/lib/evolution/camel-lock-helper-1.2
-rwsr-xr-- root:messagebus usr/lib/dbus-1.0/dbus-daemon-launch-helper
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/lib/openssh/ssh-keysign
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/lib/policykit-1/polkit-agent-helper-1
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/lib/eject/dmcrypt-get-device
drwxrwsr-t root:lpadmin usr/share/ppd/custom
-rwxr-sr-x root:mlocate usr/bin/mlocate
-rwxr-sr-x root:tty usr/bin/bsd-write
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/traceroute6.iputils
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/gpasswd
-rwxr-sr-x root:ssh usr/bin/ssh-agent
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/passwd
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/pkexec
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/sudo
-rwxr-sr-x root:tty usr/bin/wall
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/chfn
-rwxr-sr-x root:shadow usr/bin/chage
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/arping
-rwxr-sr-x root:shadow usr/bin/expiry
-rwsr-sr-x daemon:daemon usr/bin/at
-rwxr-sr-x root:crontab usr/bin/crontab
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/chsh
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/newgrp
This list is not very long but it still contains some files I'd
consider crucial. Especially those in the last third, like passwd,
crontab, etc., and of course sudo.
Many thanks for the effort to list those files! I will investigate a bit more, change those groups-settings and oberserve if anything still appears strange. Thank you also for your explanation, which is even more helpful. However, what I don't understand: if the removing the writable bits for groups doesn't affect won't affect the SETGID or SETUID bits, why did I have problems with my sudo command, that issudo: /usr/bin/sudo must be owned by uid 0 and have the setuid bit set? See here
– Helmut
Dec 8 '18 at 16:14
@Helmut Oh. I just tried, you are right. I stand corrected. I opened a terminal and didsudo -ito get a root shell. Then I didchown root:root /usr/bin/sudoand indeed, the setuid bit has gone andsudois broken :-( The setuid bit isn't removed by thechmod g-wbut by thechown. I'm afraid my whole answer has proved wrong now.
– PerlDuck
Dec 8 '18 at 16:34
@Helmut I updated my post and added "my" SETUID/SETGID files. I'm not satisfied with my answer, though. Maybe I'll remove it because it is not a real answer but rather a list of files that would have been affected on my personal installation and yours is likely to be different.
– PerlDuck
Dec 8 '18 at 17:30
1
I think it really helps, please leave it. Changing those owners back won't solve all my problems, but I might survive until I can reinstall the system in a couple of weeks! - I removed the "correct answer" selection, nonetheless this is perhaps the only answer that can be given under my circumstances.
– Helmut
Dec 8 '18 at 17:36
@Helmut Ok. :-) Good to hear it helped you at least a bit. I think the most important thing is thesudocommand. If that works, everything else can be recovered.
– PerlDuck
Dec 8 '18 at 17:38
|
show 2 more comments
I think you were lucky because you just removed the "writable" bit for groups.
This won't affect the SETGID or SETUID bits. If they were set before, they are
still set. The command chmod -R 777 /usr on the other hand resets all bits
to rwx while removing any other bits at the same time, including the s bits.
This is why people who issued chmod -R 777 /usr are usually forced to do
a re-install.
Maybe the observations I made on my system can help you. I have run some find commands to see which
files and directories would have been affected by the commands you issued. Here are the results:
# Find all files and directories NOT owned by user root:
find usr -not -user root -ls
3407926 52 -rwsr-sr-x 1 daemon daemon 51464 Feb 20 2018 usr/bin/at
# Find all files and directories NOT owned by group root:
find usr -not -group root -ls
3418319 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6
3418322 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages
3419229 4 drwxrwsr-x 4 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7
3419230 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 26 2018 usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages
1049153 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages
3544477 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/fonts
3418324 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs
3544479 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp
3416934 372 -rwsr-xr-- 1 root dip 378600 Jun 12 19:20 usr/sbin/pppd
3410196 40 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 39000 Apr 3 2018 usr/sbin/ssmtp
3408208 12 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root utmp 10232 Mär 11 2016 usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/utempter/utempter
3419827 12 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root tty 10232 Aug 4 2017 usr/lib/mc/cons.saver
3428536 16 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 14336 Jul 31 16:14 usr/lib/evolution/camel-lock-helper-1.2
3416858 44 -rwsr-xr-- 1 root messagebus 42992 Nov 15 2017 usr/lib/dbus-1.0/dbus-daemon-launch-helper
1183416 4 drwxrwsr-t 2 root lpadmin 4096 Nov 8 2017 usr/share/ppd/custom
3410118 44 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mlocate 43088 Mär 1 2018 usr/bin/mlocate
3408029 16 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root tty 14328 Jan 17 2018 usr/bin/bsd-write
3414379 356 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root ssh 362640 Nov 5 12:51 usr/bin/ssh-agent
3410676 32 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root tty 30800 Jul 26 18:20 usr/bin/wall
3409008 72 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root shadow 71816 Jan 25 2018 usr/bin/chage
3416771 24 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root shadow 22808 Jan 25 2018 usr/bin/expiry
3407926 52 -rwsr-sr-x 1 daemon daemon 51464 Feb 20 2018 usr/bin/at
3409356 40 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root crontab 39352 Nov 16 2017 usr/bin/crontab
# find objects that have the group-writable bit set and are owned by user=root but group!=root:
find usr -perm -0020 -user root -not -group root -ls
3418319 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6
3418322 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages
3419229 4 drwxrwsr-x 4 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7
3419230 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 26 2018 usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages
1049153 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages
3544477 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/fonts
3418324 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs
3544479 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp
1183416 4 drwxrwsr-t 2 root lpadmin 4096 Nov 8 2017 usr/share/ppd/custom
Of course, your mileage may vary have varied but I'm confident that
you only "broke" a handful of files. The vast majority of objects below
/usr are owned by root:root and usually have either rwxrwxr-x
or rwxr-xr-x. Removing the g-w bit doesn't really do harm because it
removes the writeable bit for the group root but (at least on my standard
system) the only member of that group is the user root anyway and he has
write access via the user permissions (which you didn't change) and doesn't
really need write access via group membership.
Btw, my /usr itself has the following attributes:
drwxr-xr-x 10 root root 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/
Update
The OP mentions he faced the error
sudo: /usr/bin/sudo must be owned by uid 0 and have the setuid bit set
after issuing chmod g-w and chown root:root and had to fix it with
chmod 4755 /usr/bin/sudo. As it turns out, the chown g-w indeed
does NOT change the setuid bit but the chown root:root did.
It apparently clears those SETUID (and presumably also the SETGID and
STICKY) bits. To me, this is unexpected behaviour but I'm pretty sure
there's an explanation and/or reason. However. I ran another find
command to see which of my files below /usr have one or more of
SETUID, SETGID, and STICKY bits set:
find usr -perm /7000 -printf '%Mt%u:%gt%pn'
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python3.6
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python2.7
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/share/fonts
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/share/emacs
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp
-rwsr-xr-- root:dip usr/sbin/pppd
-rwxr-sr-x root:mail usr/sbin/ssmtp
-rwxr-sr-x root:utmp usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/utempter/utempter
-rwsr-sr-x root:root usr/lib/xorg/Xorg.wrap
-rwxr-sr-x root:tty usr/lib/mc/cons.saver
-rwsr-sr-x root:root usr/lib/snapd/snap-confine
-rwxr-sr-x root:mail usr/lib/evolution/camel-lock-helper-1.2
-rwsr-xr-- root:messagebus usr/lib/dbus-1.0/dbus-daemon-launch-helper
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/lib/openssh/ssh-keysign
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/lib/policykit-1/polkit-agent-helper-1
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/lib/eject/dmcrypt-get-device
drwxrwsr-t root:lpadmin usr/share/ppd/custom
-rwxr-sr-x root:mlocate usr/bin/mlocate
-rwxr-sr-x root:tty usr/bin/bsd-write
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/traceroute6.iputils
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/gpasswd
-rwxr-sr-x root:ssh usr/bin/ssh-agent
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/passwd
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/pkexec
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/sudo
-rwxr-sr-x root:tty usr/bin/wall
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/chfn
-rwxr-sr-x root:shadow usr/bin/chage
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/arping
-rwxr-sr-x root:shadow usr/bin/expiry
-rwsr-sr-x daemon:daemon usr/bin/at
-rwxr-sr-x root:crontab usr/bin/crontab
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/chsh
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/newgrp
This list is not very long but it still contains some files I'd
consider crucial. Especially those in the last third, like passwd,
crontab, etc., and of course sudo.
Many thanks for the effort to list those files! I will investigate a bit more, change those groups-settings and oberserve if anything still appears strange. Thank you also for your explanation, which is even more helpful. However, what I don't understand: if the removing the writable bits for groups doesn't affect won't affect the SETGID or SETUID bits, why did I have problems with my sudo command, that issudo: /usr/bin/sudo must be owned by uid 0 and have the setuid bit set? See here
– Helmut
Dec 8 '18 at 16:14
@Helmut Oh. I just tried, you are right. I stand corrected. I opened a terminal and didsudo -ito get a root shell. Then I didchown root:root /usr/bin/sudoand indeed, the setuid bit has gone andsudois broken :-( The setuid bit isn't removed by thechmod g-wbut by thechown. I'm afraid my whole answer has proved wrong now.
– PerlDuck
Dec 8 '18 at 16:34
@Helmut I updated my post and added "my" SETUID/SETGID files. I'm not satisfied with my answer, though. Maybe I'll remove it because it is not a real answer but rather a list of files that would have been affected on my personal installation and yours is likely to be different.
– PerlDuck
Dec 8 '18 at 17:30
1
I think it really helps, please leave it. Changing those owners back won't solve all my problems, but I might survive until I can reinstall the system in a couple of weeks! - I removed the "correct answer" selection, nonetheless this is perhaps the only answer that can be given under my circumstances.
– Helmut
Dec 8 '18 at 17:36
@Helmut Ok. :-) Good to hear it helped you at least a bit. I think the most important thing is thesudocommand. If that works, everything else can be recovered.
– PerlDuck
Dec 8 '18 at 17:38
|
show 2 more comments
I think you were lucky because you just removed the "writable" bit for groups.
This won't affect the SETGID or SETUID bits. If they were set before, they are
still set. The command chmod -R 777 /usr on the other hand resets all bits
to rwx while removing any other bits at the same time, including the s bits.
This is why people who issued chmod -R 777 /usr are usually forced to do
a re-install.
Maybe the observations I made on my system can help you. I have run some find commands to see which
files and directories would have been affected by the commands you issued. Here are the results:
# Find all files and directories NOT owned by user root:
find usr -not -user root -ls
3407926 52 -rwsr-sr-x 1 daemon daemon 51464 Feb 20 2018 usr/bin/at
# Find all files and directories NOT owned by group root:
find usr -not -group root -ls
3418319 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6
3418322 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages
3419229 4 drwxrwsr-x 4 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7
3419230 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 26 2018 usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages
1049153 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages
3544477 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/fonts
3418324 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs
3544479 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp
3416934 372 -rwsr-xr-- 1 root dip 378600 Jun 12 19:20 usr/sbin/pppd
3410196 40 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 39000 Apr 3 2018 usr/sbin/ssmtp
3408208 12 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root utmp 10232 Mär 11 2016 usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/utempter/utempter
3419827 12 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root tty 10232 Aug 4 2017 usr/lib/mc/cons.saver
3428536 16 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 14336 Jul 31 16:14 usr/lib/evolution/camel-lock-helper-1.2
3416858 44 -rwsr-xr-- 1 root messagebus 42992 Nov 15 2017 usr/lib/dbus-1.0/dbus-daemon-launch-helper
1183416 4 drwxrwsr-t 2 root lpadmin 4096 Nov 8 2017 usr/share/ppd/custom
3410118 44 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mlocate 43088 Mär 1 2018 usr/bin/mlocate
3408029 16 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root tty 14328 Jan 17 2018 usr/bin/bsd-write
3414379 356 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root ssh 362640 Nov 5 12:51 usr/bin/ssh-agent
3410676 32 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root tty 30800 Jul 26 18:20 usr/bin/wall
3409008 72 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root shadow 71816 Jan 25 2018 usr/bin/chage
3416771 24 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root shadow 22808 Jan 25 2018 usr/bin/expiry
3407926 52 -rwsr-sr-x 1 daemon daemon 51464 Feb 20 2018 usr/bin/at
3409356 40 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root crontab 39352 Nov 16 2017 usr/bin/crontab
# find objects that have the group-writable bit set and are owned by user=root but group!=root:
find usr -perm -0020 -user root -not -group root -ls
3418319 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6
3418322 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages
3419229 4 drwxrwsr-x 4 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7
3419230 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 26 2018 usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages
1049153 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages
3544477 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/fonts
3418324 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs
3544479 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp
1183416 4 drwxrwsr-t 2 root lpadmin 4096 Nov 8 2017 usr/share/ppd/custom
Of course, your mileage may vary have varied but I'm confident that
you only "broke" a handful of files. The vast majority of objects below
/usr are owned by root:root and usually have either rwxrwxr-x
or rwxr-xr-x. Removing the g-w bit doesn't really do harm because it
removes the writeable bit for the group root but (at least on my standard
system) the only member of that group is the user root anyway and he has
write access via the user permissions (which you didn't change) and doesn't
really need write access via group membership.
Btw, my /usr itself has the following attributes:
drwxr-xr-x 10 root root 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/
Update
The OP mentions he faced the error
sudo: /usr/bin/sudo must be owned by uid 0 and have the setuid bit set
after issuing chmod g-w and chown root:root and had to fix it with
chmod 4755 /usr/bin/sudo. As it turns out, the chown g-w indeed
does NOT change the setuid bit but the chown root:root did.
It apparently clears those SETUID (and presumably also the SETGID and
STICKY) bits. To me, this is unexpected behaviour but I'm pretty sure
there's an explanation and/or reason. However. I ran another find
command to see which of my files below /usr have one or more of
SETUID, SETGID, and STICKY bits set:
find usr -perm /7000 -printf '%Mt%u:%gt%pn'
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python3.6
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python2.7
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/share/fonts
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/share/emacs
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp
-rwsr-xr-- root:dip usr/sbin/pppd
-rwxr-sr-x root:mail usr/sbin/ssmtp
-rwxr-sr-x root:utmp usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/utempter/utempter
-rwsr-sr-x root:root usr/lib/xorg/Xorg.wrap
-rwxr-sr-x root:tty usr/lib/mc/cons.saver
-rwsr-sr-x root:root usr/lib/snapd/snap-confine
-rwxr-sr-x root:mail usr/lib/evolution/camel-lock-helper-1.2
-rwsr-xr-- root:messagebus usr/lib/dbus-1.0/dbus-daemon-launch-helper
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/lib/openssh/ssh-keysign
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/lib/policykit-1/polkit-agent-helper-1
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/lib/eject/dmcrypt-get-device
drwxrwsr-t root:lpadmin usr/share/ppd/custom
-rwxr-sr-x root:mlocate usr/bin/mlocate
-rwxr-sr-x root:tty usr/bin/bsd-write
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/traceroute6.iputils
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/gpasswd
-rwxr-sr-x root:ssh usr/bin/ssh-agent
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/passwd
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/pkexec
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/sudo
-rwxr-sr-x root:tty usr/bin/wall
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/chfn
-rwxr-sr-x root:shadow usr/bin/chage
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/arping
-rwxr-sr-x root:shadow usr/bin/expiry
-rwsr-sr-x daemon:daemon usr/bin/at
-rwxr-sr-x root:crontab usr/bin/crontab
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/chsh
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/newgrp
This list is not very long but it still contains some files I'd
consider crucial. Especially those in the last third, like passwd,
crontab, etc., and of course sudo.
I think you were lucky because you just removed the "writable" bit for groups.
This won't affect the SETGID or SETUID bits. If they were set before, they are
still set. The command chmod -R 777 /usr on the other hand resets all bits
to rwx while removing any other bits at the same time, including the s bits.
This is why people who issued chmod -R 777 /usr are usually forced to do
a re-install.
Maybe the observations I made on my system can help you. I have run some find commands to see which
files and directories would have been affected by the commands you issued. Here are the results:
# Find all files and directories NOT owned by user root:
find usr -not -user root -ls
3407926 52 -rwsr-sr-x 1 daemon daemon 51464 Feb 20 2018 usr/bin/at
# Find all files and directories NOT owned by group root:
find usr -not -group root -ls
3418319 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6
3418322 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages
3419229 4 drwxrwsr-x 4 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7
3419230 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 26 2018 usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages
1049153 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages
3544477 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/fonts
3418324 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs
3544479 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp
3416934 372 -rwsr-xr-- 1 root dip 378600 Jun 12 19:20 usr/sbin/pppd
3410196 40 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 39000 Apr 3 2018 usr/sbin/ssmtp
3408208 12 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root utmp 10232 Mär 11 2016 usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/utempter/utempter
3419827 12 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root tty 10232 Aug 4 2017 usr/lib/mc/cons.saver
3428536 16 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 14336 Jul 31 16:14 usr/lib/evolution/camel-lock-helper-1.2
3416858 44 -rwsr-xr-- 1 root messagebus 42992 Nov 15 2017 usr/lib/dbus-1.0/dbus-daemon-launch-helper
1183416 4 drwxrwsr-t 2 root lpadmin 4096 Nov 8 2017 usr/share/ppd/custom
3410118 44 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mlocate 43088 Mär 1 2018 usr/bin/mlocate
3408029 16 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root tty 14328 Jan 17 2018 usr/bin/bsd-write
3414379 356 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root ssh 362640 Nov 5 12:51 usr/bin/ssh-agent
3410676 32 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root tty 30800 Jul 26 18:20 usr/bin/wall
3409008 72 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root shadow 71816 Jan 25 2018 usr/bin/chage
3416771 24 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root shadow 22808 Jan 25 2018 usr/bin/expiry
3407926 52 -rwsr-sr-x 1 daemon daemon 51464 Feb 20 2018 usr/bin/at
3409356 40 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root crontab 39352 Nov 16 2017 usr/bin/crontab
# find objects that have the group-writable bit set and are owned by user=root but group!=root:
find usr -perm -0020 -user root -not -group root -ls
3418319 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6
3418322 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages
3419229 4 drwxrwsr-x 4 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7
3419230 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 26 2018 usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages
1049153 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages
3544477 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/fonts
3418324 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs
3544479 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp
1183416 4 drwxrwsr-t 2 root lpadmin 4096 Nov 8 2017 usr/share/ppd/custom
Of course, your mileage may vary have varied but I'm confident that
you only "broke" a handful of files. The vast majority of objects below
/usr are owned by root:root and usually have either rwxrwxr-x
or rwxr-xr-x. Removing the g-w bit doesn't really do harm because it
removes the writeable bit for the group root but (at least on my standard
system) the only member of that group is the user root anyway and he has
write access via the user permissions (which you didn't change) and doesn't
really need write access via group membership.
Btw, my /usr itself has the following attributes:
drwxr-xr-x 10 root root 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/
Update
The OP mentions he faced the error
sudo: /usr/bin/sudo must be owned by uid 0 and have the setuid bit set
after issuing chmod g-w and chown root:root and had to fix it with
chmod 4755 /usr/bin/sudo. As it turns out, the chown g-w indeed
does NOT change the setuid bit but the chown root:root did.
It apparently clears those SETUID (and presumably also the SETGID and
STICKY) bits. To me, this is unexpected behaviour but I'm pretty sure
there's an explanation and/or reason. However. I ran another find
command to see which of my files below /usr have one or more of
SETUID, SETGID, and STICKY bits set:
find usr -perm /7000 -printf '%Mt%u:%gt%pn'
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python3.6
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python2.7
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/share/fonts
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/share/emacs
drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp
-rwsr-xr-- root:dip usr/sbin/pppd
-rwxr-sr-x root:mail usr/sbin/ssmtp
-rwxr-sr-x root:utmp usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/utempter/utempter
-rwsr-sr-x root:root usr/lib/xorg/Xorg.wrap
-rwxr-sr-x root:tty usr/lib/mc/cons.saver
-rwsr-sr-x root:root usr/lib/snapd/snap-confine
-rwxr-sr-x root:mail usr/lib/evolution/camel-lock-helper-1.2
-rwsr-xr-- root:messagebus usr/lib/dbus-1.0/dbus-daemon-launch-helper
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/lib/openssh/ssh-keysign
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/lib/policykit-1/polkit-agent-helper-1
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/lib/eject/dmcrypt-get-device
drwxrwsr-t root:lpadmin usr/share/ppd/custom
-rwxr-sr-x root:mlocate usr/bin/mlocate
-rwxr-sr-x root:tty usr/bin/bsd-write
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/traceroute6.iputils
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/gpasswd
-rwxr-sr-x root:ssh usr/bin/ssh-agent
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/passwd
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/pkexec
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/sudo
-rwxr-sr-x root:tty usr/bin/wall
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/chfn
-rwxr-sr-x root:shadow usr/bin/chage
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/arping
-rwxr-sr-x root:shadow usr/bin/expiry
-rwsr-sr-x daemon:daemon usr/bin/at
-rwxr-sr-x root:crontab usr/bin/crontab
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/chsh
-rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/newgrp
This list is not very long but it still contains some files I'd
consider crucial. Especially those in the last third, like passwd,
crontab, etc., and of course sudo.
edited Dec 8 '18 at 17:26
answered Dec 8 '18 at 16:01
PerlDuckPerlDuck
6,16211334
6,16211334
Many thanks for the effort to list those files! I will investigate a bit more, change those groups-settings and oberserve if anything still appears strange. Thank you also for your explanation, which is even more helpful. However, what I don't understand: if the removing the writable bits for groups doesn't affect won't affect the SETGID or SETUID bits, why did I have problems with my sudo command, that issudo: /usr/bin/sudo must be owned by uid 0 and have the setuid bit set? See here
– Helmut
Dec 8 '18 at 16:14
@Helmut Oh. I just tried, you are right. I stand corrected. I opened a terminal and didsudo -ito get a root shell. Then I didchown root:root /usr/bin/sudoand indeed, the setuid bit has gone andsudois broken :-( The setuid bit isn't removed by thechmod g-wbut by thechown. I'm afraid my whole answer has proved wrong now.
– PerlDuck
Dec 8 '18 at 16:34
@Helmut I updated my post and added "my" SETUID/SETGID files. I'm not satisfied with my answer, though. Maybe I'll remove it because it is not a real answer but rather a list of files that would have been affected on my personal installation and yours is likely to be different.
– PerlDuck
Dec 8 '18 at 17:30
1
I think it really helps, please leave it. Changing those owners back won't solve all my problems, but I might survive until I can reinstall the system in a couple of weeks! - I removed the "correct answer" selection, nonetheless this is perhaps the only answer that can be given under my circumstances.
– Helmut
Dec 8 '18 at 17:36
@Helmut Ok. :-) Good to hear it helped you at least a bit. I think the most important thing is thesudocommand. If that works, everything else can be recovered.
– PerlDuck
Dec 8 '18 at 17:38
|
show 2 more comments
Many thanks for the effort to list those files! I will investigate a bit more, change those groups-settings and oberserve if anything still appears strange. Thank you also for your explanation, which is even more helpful. However, what I don't understand: if the removing the writable bits for groups doesn't affect won't affect the SETGID or SETUID bits, why did I have problems with my sudo command, that issudo: /usr/bin/sudo must be owned by uid 0 and have the setuid bit set? See here
– Helmut
Dec 8 '18 at 16:14
@Helmut Oh. I just tried, you are right. I stand corrected. I opened a terminal and didsudo -ito get a root shell. Then I didchown root:root /usr/bin/sudoand indeed, the setuid bit has gone andsudois broken :-( The setuid bit isn't removed by thechmod g-wbut by thechown. I'm afraid my whole answer has proved wrong now.
– PerlDuck
Dec 8 '18 at 16:34
@Helmut I updated my post and added "my" SETUID/SETGID files. I'm not satisfied with my answer, though. Maybe I'll remove it because it is not a real answer but rather a list of files that would have been affected on my personal installation and yours is likely to be different.
– PerlDuck
Dec 8 '18 at 17:30
1
I think it really helps, please leave it. Changing those owners back won't solve all my problems, but I might survive until I can reinstall the system in a couple of weeks! - I removed the "correct answer" selection, nonetheless this is perhaps the only answer that can be given under my circumstances.
– Helmut
Dec 8 '18 at 17:36
@Helmut Ok. :-) Good to hear it helped you at least a bit. I think the most important thing is thesudocommand. If that works, everything else can be recovered.
– PerlDuck
Dec 8 '18 at 17:38
Many thanks for the effort to list those files! I will investigate a bit more, change those groups-settings and oberserve if anything still appears strange. Thank you also for your explanation, which is even more helpful. However, what I don't understand: if the removing the writable bits for groups doesn't affect won't affect the SETGID or SETUID bits, why did I have problems with my sudo command, that is
sudo: /usr/bin/sudo must be owned by uid 0 and have the setuid bit set? See here– Helmut
Dec 8 '18 at 16:14
Many thanks for the effort to list those files! I will investigate a bit more, change those groups-settings and oberserve if anything still appears strange. Thank you also for your explanation, which is even more helpful. However, what I don't understand: if the removing the writable bits for groups doesn't affect won't affect the SETGID or SETUID bits, why did I have problems with my sudo command, that is
sudo: /usr/bin/sudo must be owned by uid 0 and have the setuid bit set? See here– Helmut
Dec 8 '18 at 16:14
@Helmut Oh. I just tried, you are right. I stand corrected. I opened a terminal and did
sudo -i to get a root shell. Then I did chown root:root /usr/bin/sudo and indeed, the setuid bit has gone and sudo is broken :-( The setuid bit isn't removed by the chmod g-w but by the chown. I'm afraid my whole answer has proved wrong now.– PerlDuck
Dec 8 '18 at 16:34
@Helmut Oh. I just tried, you are right. I stand corrected. I opened a terminal and did
sudo -i to get a root shell. Then I did chown root:root /usr/bin/sudo and indeed, the setuid bit has gone and sudo is broken :-( The setuid bit isn't removed by the chmod g-w but by the chown. I'm afraid my whole answer has proved wrong now.– PerlDuck
Dec 8 '18 at 16:34
@Helmut I updated my post and added "my" SETUID/SETGID files. I'm not satisfied with my answer, though. Maybe I'll remove it because it is not a real answer but rather a list of files that would have been affected on my personal installation and yours is likely to be different.
– PerlDuck
Dec 8 '18 at 17:30
@Helmut I updated my post and added "my" SETUID/SETGID files. I'm not satisfied with my answer, though. Maybe I'll remove it because it is not a real answer but rather a list of files that would have been affected on my personal installation and yours is likely to be different.
– PerlDuck
Dec 8 '18 at 17:30
1
1
I think it really helps, please leave it. Changing those owners back won't solve all my problems, but I might survive until I can reinstall the system in a couple of weeks! - I removed the "correct answer" selection, nonetheless this is perhaps the only answer that can be given under my circumstances.
– Helmut
Dec 8 '18 at 17:36
I think it really helps, please leave it. Changing those owners back won't solve all my problems, but I might survive until I can reinstall the system in a couple of weeks! - I removed the "correct answer" selection, nonetheless this is perhaps the only answer that can be given under my circumstances.
– Helmut
Dec 8 '18 at 17:36
@Helmut Ok. :-) Good to hear it helped you at least a bit. I think the most important thing is the
sudo command. If that works, everything else can be recovered.– PerlDuck
Dec 8 '18 at 17:38
@Helmut Ok. :-) Good to hear it helped you at least a bit. I think the most important thing is the
sudo command. If that works, everything else can be recovered.– PerlDuck
Dec 8 '18 at 17:38
|
show 2 more comments
I think the above answer from @PerlDuck explains most crucial things. After working through each file manually, I think I removed the largest mess. If this computer would have been exposed to the internet, I would have reinstalled right away - now I have some more time.
Anyway, I want to add a link to a complete list of Linux default permissions here:
https://www.vidarholen.net/contents/junk/ubuntu_permissions.html This also helped me restore a number of additional file permissions.
1
Great finding. But the link you show tells e.g. for thesudocommand:chmod 4755 /usr/bin/sudo; chown root:root /usr/bin/sudo. As we both just learned, thechownundoes thechmod 4xxx(removes the special bits). It's better to swap the two commands, i.e.chownfirst and thenchmod. Nonetheless, that list is good. I'd first dogrep -E 'chown.*/usr'and thengrep -E 'chmod.*/usr'(or similar, untested) in your case and run the results in that order.
– PerlDuck
Dec 8 '18 at 19:41
1
Yes, totally true! I didn't actually follow this order, just looked up information for some links. Thanks for mentioning this. Also: I find doingchmod g+s /file/thatneeds/setgidandchmod u+s /file/thatneeds/setuidboth more legible and less dangerous for typos.
– Helmut
Dec 9 '18 at 5:50
add a comment |
I think the above answer from @PerlDuck explains most crucial things. After working through each file manually, I think I removed the largest mess. If this computer would have been exposed to the internet, I would have reinstalled right away - now I have some more time.
Anyway, I want to add a link to a complete list of Linux default permissions here:
https://www.vidarholen.net/contents/junk/ubuntu_permissions.html This also helped me restore a number of additional file permissions.
1
Great finding. But the link you show tells e.g. for thesudocommand:chmod 4755 /usr/bin/sudo; chown root:root /usr/bin/sudo. As we both just learned, thechownundoes thechmod 4xxx(removes the special bits). It's better to swap the two commands, i.e.chownfirst and thenchmod. Nonetheless, that list is good. I'd first dogrep -E 'chown.*/usr'and thengrep -E 'chmod.*/usr'(or similar, untested) in your case and run the results in that order.
– PerlDuck
Dec 8 '18 at 19:41
1
Yes, totally true! I didn't actually follow this order, just looked up information for some links. Thanks for mentioning this. Also: I find doingchmod g+s /file/thatneeds/setgidandchmod u+s /file/thatneeds/setuidboth more legible and less dangerous for typos.
– Helmut
Dec 9 '18 at 5:50
add a comment |
I think the above answer from @PerlDuck explains most crucial things. After working through each file manually, I think I removed the largest mess. If this computer would have been exposed to the internet, I would have reinstalled right away - now I have some more time.
Anyway, I want to add a link to a complete list of Linux default permissions here:
https://www.vidarholen.net/contents/junk/ubuntu_permissions.html This also helped me restore a number of additional file permissions.
I think the above answer from @PerlDuck explains most crucial things. After working through each file manually, I think I removed the largest mess. If this computer would have been exposed to the internet, I would have reinstalled right away - now I have some more time.
Anyway, I want to add a link to a complete list of Linux default permissions here:
https://www.vidarholen.net/contents/junk/ubuntu_permissions.html This also helped me restore a number of additional file permissions.
answered Dec 8 '18 at 19:19
HelmutHelmut
534
534
1
Great finding. But the link you show tells e.g. for thesudocommand:chmod 4755 /usr/bin/sudo; chown root:root /usr/bin/sudo. As we both just learned, thechownundoes thechmod 4xxx(removes the special bits). It's better to swap the two commands, i.e.chownfirst and thenchmod. Nonetheless, that list is good. I'd first dogrep -E 'chown.*/usr'and thengrep -E 'chmod.*/usr'(or similar, untested) in your case and run the results in that order.
– PerlDuck
Dec 8 '18 at 19:41
1
Yes, totally true! I didn't actually follow this order, just looked up information for some links. Thanks for mentioning this. Also: I find doingchmod g+s /file/thatneeds/setgidandchmod u+s /file/thatneeds/setuidboth more legible and less dangerous for typos.
– Helmut
Dec 9 '18 at 5:50
add a comment |
1
Great finding. But the link you show tells e.g. for thesudocommand:chmod 4755 /usr/bin/sudo; chown root:root /usr/bin/sudo. As we both just learned, thechownundoes thechmod 4xxx(removes the special bits). It's better to swap the two commands, i.e.chownfirst and thenchmod. Nonetheless, that list is good. I'd first dogrep -E 'chown.*/usr'and thengrep -E 'chmod.*/usr'(or similar, untested) in your case and run the results in that order.
– PerlDuck
Dec 8 '18 at 19:41
1
Yes, totally true! I didn't actually follow this order, just looked up information for some links. Thanks for mentioning this. Also: I find doingchmod g+s /file/thatneeds/setgidandchmod u+s /file/thatneeds/setuidboth more legible and less dangerous for typos.
– Helmut
Dec 9 '18 at 5:50
1
1
Great finding. But the link you show tells e.g. for the
sudo command: chmod 4755 /usr/bin/sudo; chown root:root /usr/bin/sudo. As we both just learned, the chown undoes the chmod 4xxx (removes the special bits). It's better to swap the two commands, i.e. chown first and then chmod. Nonetheless, that list is good. I'd first do grep -E 'chown.*/usr' and then grep -E 'chmod.*/usr' (or similar, untested) in your case and run the results in that order.– PerlDuck
Dec 8 '18 at 19:41
Great finding. But the link you show tells e.g. for the
sudo command: chmod 4755 /usr/bin/sudo; chown root:root /usr/bin/sudo. As we both just learned, the chown undoes the chmod 4xxx (removes the special bits). It's better to swap the two commands, i.e. chown first and then chmod. Nonetheless, that list is good. I'd first do grep -E 'chown.*/usr' and then grep -E 'chmod.*/usr' (or similar, untested) in your case and run the results in that order.– PerlDuck
Dec 8 '18 at 19:41
1
1
Yes, totally true! I didn't actually follow this order, just looked up information for some links. Thanks for mentioning this. Also: I find doing
chmod g+s /file/thatneeds/setgid and chmod u+s /file/thatneeds/setuid both more legible and less dangerous for typos.– Helmut
Dec 9 '18 at 5:50
Yes, totally true! I didn't actually follow this order, just looked up information for some links. Thanks for mentioning this. Also: I find doing
chmod g+s /file/thatneeds/setgid and chmod u+s /file/thatneeds/setuid both more legible and less dangerous for typos.– Helmut
Dec 9 '18 at 5:50
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1099381%2ffix-setuid-and-setgid-bits-in-usr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown