Volume of Revolution for $y=1-x^2$ and $y=2x$
$begingroup$
There's a question on our review sheet that I don't quite understand. It asks for the integral to find a volume of a solid bounded by the graphs $y=1-x^2$, $x=0$, and $y=2x$. The correct answer is $int_{0}^{sqrt2-1} pi[(1-x^2)^2-(2x)^2]dx$. But since they obviously had to put everything in terms of y to avoid doing two integrals and to get those bounds, shouldn't the answer have the inverse functions $int_{0}^{sqrt2-1} pi[(1-y)-(y/2)^2]dy$? Or am I missing something about the washer method?
calculus solid-of-revolution
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There's a question on our review sheet that I don't quite understand. It asks for the integral to find a volume of a solid bounded by the graphs $y=1-x^2$, $x=0$, and $y=2x$. The correct answer is $int_{0}^{sqrt2-1} pi[(1-x^2)^2-(2x)^2]dx$. But since they obviously had to put everything in terms of y to avoid doing two integrals and to get those bounds, shouldn't the answer have the inverse functions $int_{0}^{sqrt2-1} pi[(1-y)-(y/2)^2]dy$? Or am I missing something about the washer method?
calculus solid-of-revolution
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There's a question on our review sheet that I don't quite understand. It asks for the integral to find a volume of a solid bounded by the graphs $y=1-x^2$, $x=0$, and $y=2x$. The correct answer is $int_{0}^{sqrt2-1} pi[(1-x^2)^2-(2x)^2]dx$. But since they obviously had to put everything in terms of y to avoid doing two integrals and to get those bounds, shouldn't the answer have the inverse functions $int_{0}^{sqrt2-1} pi[(1-y)-(y/2)^2]dy$? Or am I missing something about the washer method?
calculus solid-of-revolution
$endgroup$
There's a question on our review sheet that I don't quite understand. It asks for the integral to find a volume of a solid bounded by the graphs $y=1-x^2$, $x=0$, and $y=2x$. The correct answer is $int_{0}^{sqrt2-1} pi[(1-x^2)^2-(2x)^2]dx$. But since they obviously had to put everything in terms of y to avoid doing two integrals and to get those bounds, shouldn't the answer have the inverse functions $int_{0}^{sqrt2-1} pi[(1-y)-(y/2)^2]dy$? Or am I missing something about the washer method?
calculus solid-of-revolution
calculus solid-of-revolution
edited Dec 8 '18 at 20:14
user3896106
asked Dec 8 '18 at 20:09
user3896106user3896106
83
83
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Try graphing the two functions. Inverses are unnecessary. This is a straight forward application of the disc (or as you put it "washer") method. This is because you can compute both volumes by the disc method and then subtract.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
It seems I'm am either very tired or unable to read. I misinterpreted x=0 for y=0, so I though that it was asking for the solid of revolution of the between 0 and 1. That makes the problem much easier. Thanks for the help.
$endgroup$
– user3896106
Dec 8 '18 at 20:20
$begingroup$
No problem. You need of course to find the point of intersection of the two curves- that accounts for the limits.
$endgroup$
– Chris Custer
Dec 8 '18 at 20:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The integral
$$int_{0}^{sqrt2-1} pi[(1-x^2)^2-(2x)^2]dx$$
represents the volume for the revolution around the $x$ axis volume of the area bounded between the two functions for $xin [0,sqrt 2-1]$.
Refer also to the following sketch
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How do you decide of the axis of rotation from the OP?
$endgroup$
– DJohnM
Dec 8 '18 at 21:57
$begingroup$
@DJohnM For the given set up otherwise the integral would be different and in 2 parts.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 8 '18 at 22:01
$begingroup$
So you use the given answer to decide what the missing information in the question actually is?
$endgroup$
– DJohnM
Dec 8 '18 at 22:17
$begingroup$
@DJohnM The OP is asking about: "There's a question on our review sheet that I don't quite understand...". Therefore I've explained what the given set up means and how it is obtained. Do not you agree with that interpretation?
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 8 '18 at 22:22
$begingroup$
Yes, I agree...
$endgroup$
– DJohnM
Dec 8 '18 at 22:44
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031579%2fvolume-of-revolution-for-y-1-x2-and-y-2x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Try graphing the two functions. Inverses are unnecessary. This is a straight forward application of the disc (or as you put it "washer") method. This is because you can compute both volumes by the disc method and then subtract.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
It seems I'm am either very tired or unable to read. I misinterpreted x=0 for y=0, so I though that it was asking for the solid of revolution of the between 0 and 1. That makes the problem much easier. Thanks for the help.
$endgroup$
– user3896106
Dec 8 '18 at 20:20
$begingroup$
No problem. You need of course to find the point of intersection of the two curves- that accounts for the limits.
$endgroup$
– Chris Custer
Dec 8 '18 at 20:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Try graphing the two functions. Inverses are unnecessary. This is a straight forward application of the disc (or as you put it "washer") method. This is because you can compute both volumes by the disc method and then subtract.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
It seems I'm am either very tired or unable to read. I misinterpreted x=0 for y=0, so I though that it was asking for the solid of revolution of the between 0 and 1. That makes the problem much easier. Thanks for the help.
$endgroup$
– user3896106
Dec 8 '18 at 20:20
$begingroup$
No problem. You need of course to find the point of intersection of the two curves- that accounts for the limits.
$endgroup$
– Chris Custer
Dec 8 '18 at 20:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Try graphing the two functions. Inverses are unnecessary. This is a straight forward application of the disc (or as you put it "washer") method. This is because you can compute both volumes by the disc method and then subtract.
$endgroup$
Try graphing the two functions. Inverses are unnecessary. This is a straight forward application of the disc (or as you put it "washer") method. This is because you can compute both volumes by the disc method and then subtract.
answered Dec 8 '18 at 20:16
Chris CusterChris Custer
12.4k3825
12.4k3825
$begingroup$
It seems I'm am either very tired or unable to read. I misinterpreted x=0 for y=0, so I though that it was asking for the solid of revolution of the between 0 and 1. That makes the problem much easier. Thanks for the help.
$endgroup$
– user3896106
Dec 8 '18 at 20:20
$begingroup$
No problem. You need of course to find the point of intersection of the two curves- that accounts for the limits.
$endgroup$
– Chris Custer
Dec 8 '18 at 20:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It seems I'm am either very tired or unable to read. I misinterpreted x=0 for y=0, so I though that it was asking for the solid of revolution of the between 0 and 1. That makes the problem much easier. Thanks for the help.
$endgroup$
– user3896106
Dec 8 '18 at 20:20
$begingroup$
No problem. You need of course to find the point of intersection of the two curves- that accounts for the limits.
$endgroup$
– Chris Custer
Dec 8 '18 at 20:43
$begingroup$
It seems I'm am either very tired or unable to read. I misinterpreted x=0 for y=0, so I though that it was asking for the solid of revolution of the between 0 and 1. That makes the problem much easier. Thanks for the help.
$endgroup$
– user3896106
Dec 8 '18 at 20:20
$begingroup$
It seems I'm am either very tired or unable to read. I misinterpreted x=0 for y=0, so I though that it was asking for the solid of revolution of the between 0 and 1. That makes the problem much easier. Thanks for the help.
$endgroup$
– user3896106
Dec 8 '18 at 20:20
$begingroup$
No problem. You need of course to find the point of intersection of the two curves- that accounts for the limits.
$endgroup$
– Chris Custer
Dec 8 '18 at 20:43
$begingroup$
No problem. You need of course to find the point of intersection of the two curves- that accounts for the limits.
$endgroup$
– Chris Custer
Dec 8 '18 at 20:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The integral
$$int_{0}^{sqrt2-1} pi[(1-x^2)^2-(2x)^2]dx$$
represents the volume for the revolution around the $x$ axis volume of the area bounded between the two functions for $xin [0,sqrt 2-1]$.
Refer also to the following sketch
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How do you decide of the axis of rotation from the OP?
$endgroup$
– DJohnM
Dec 8 '18 at 21:57
$begingroup$
@DJohnM For the given set up otherwise the integral would be different and in 2 parts.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 8 '18 at 22:01
$begingroup$
So you use the given answer to decide what the missing information in the question actually is?
$endgroup$
– DJohnM
Dec 8 '18 at 22:17
$begingroup$
@DJohnM The OP is asking about: "There's a question on our review sheet that I don't quite understand...". Therefore I've explained what the given set up means and how it is obtained. Do not you agree with that interpretation?
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 8 '18 at 22:22
$begingroup$
Yes, I agree...
$endgroup$
– DJohnM
Dec 8 '18 at 22:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The integral
$$int_{0}^{sqrt2-1} pi[(1-x^2)^2-(2x)^2]dx$$
represents the volume for the revolution around the $x$ axis volume of the area bounded between the two functions for $xin [0,sqrt 2-1]$.
Refer also to the following sketch
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How do you decide of the axis of rotation from the OP?
$endgroup$
– DJohnM
Dec 8 '18 at 21:57
$begingroup$
@DJohnM For the given set up otherwise the integral would be different and in 2 parts.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 8 '18 at 22:01
$begingroup$
So you use the given answer to decide what the missing information in the question actually is?
$endgroup$
– DJohnM
Dec 8 '18 at 22:17
$begingroup$
@DJohnM The OP is asking about: "There's a question on our review sheet that I don't quite understand...". Therefore I've explained what the given set up means and how it is obtained. Do not you agree with that interpretation?
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 8 '18 at 22:22
$begingroup$
Yes, I agree...
$endgroup$
– DJohnM
Dec 8 '18 at 22:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The integral
$$int_{0}^{sqrt2-1} pi[(1-x^2)^2-(2x)^2]dx$$
represents the volume for the revolution around the $x$ axis volume of the area bounded between the two functions for $xin [0,sqrt 2-1]$.
Refer also to the following sketch
$endgroup$
The integral
$$int_{0}^{sqrt2-1} pi[(1-x^2)^2-(2x)^2]dx$$
represents the volume for the revolution around the $x$ axis volume of the area bounded between the two functions for $xin [0,sqrt 2-1]$.
Refer also to the following sketch
edited Dec 8 '18 at 20:20
answered Dec 8 '18 at 20:13
gimusigimusi
92.8k84494
92.8k84494
$begingroup$
How do you decide of the axis of rotation from the OP?
$endgroup$
– DJohnM
Dec 8 '18 at 21:57
$begingroup$
@DJohnM For the given set up otherwise the integral would be different and in 2 parts.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 8 '18 at 22:01
$begingroup$
So you use the given answer to decide what the missing information in the question actually is?
$endgroup$
– DJohnM
Dec 8 '18 at 22:17
$begingroup$
@DJohnM The OP is asking about: "There's a question on our review sheet that I don't quite understand...". Therefore I've explained what the given set up means and how it is obtained. Do not you agree with that interpretation?
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 8 '18 at 22:22
$begingroup$
Yes, I agree...
$endgroup$
– DJohnM
Dec 8 '18 at 22:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How do you decide of the axis of rotation from the OP?
$endgroup$
– DJohnM
Dec 8 '18 at 21:57
$begingroup$
@DJohnM For the given set up otherwise the integral would be different and in 2 parts.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 8 '18 at 22:01
$begingroup$
So you use the given answer to decide what the missing information in the question actually is?
$endgroup$
– DJohnM
Dec 8 '18 at 22:17
$begingroup$
@DJohnM The OP is asking about: "There's a question on our review sheet that I don't quite understand...". Therefore I've explained what the given set up means and how it is obtained. Do not you agree with that interpretation?
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 8 '18 at 22:22
$begingroup$
Yes, I agree...
$endgroup$
– DJohnM
Dec 8 '18 at 22:44
$begingroup$
How do you decide of the axis of rotation from the OP?
$endgroup$
– DJohnM
Dec 8 '18 at 21:57
$begingroup$
How do you decide of the axis of rotation from the OP?
$endgroup$
– DJohnM
Dec 8 '18 at 21:57
$begingroup$
@DJohnM For the given set up otherwise the integral would be different and in 2 parts.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 8 '18 at 22:01
$begingroup$
@DJohnM For the given set up otherwise the integral would be different and in 2 parts.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 8 '18 at 22:01
$begingroup$
So you use the given answer to decide what the missing information in the question actually is?
$endgroup$
– DJohnM
Dec 8 '18 at 22:17
$begingroup$
So you use the given answer to decide what the missing information in the question actually is?
$endgroup$
– DJohnM
Dec 8 '18 at 22:17
$begingroup$
@DJohnM The OP is asking about: "There's a question on our review sheet that I don't quite understand...". Therefore I've explained what the given set up means and how it is obtained. Do not you agree with that interpretation?
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 8 '18 at 22:22
$begingroup$
@DJohnM The OP is asking about: "There's a question on our review sheet that I don't quite understand...". Therefore I've explained what the given set up means and how it is obtained. Do not you agree with that interpretation?
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 8 '18 at 22:22
$begingroup$
Yes, I agree...
$endgroup$
– DJohnM
Dec 8 '18 at 22:44
$begingroup$
Yes, I agree...
$endgroup$
– DJohnM
Dec 8 '18 at 22:44
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031579%2fvolume-of-revolution-for-y-1-x2-and-y-2x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown