Can we have a simple root of real polynomials with coefficients as linear functions such that the curve of...
$begingroup$
Let us consider a parametrized polynomial
begin{align*}
f(x, r) = x^n + ra_{n-1} x^{n-1} + dots + ra_0,
end{align*}
where $r in mathbb R$ is the parameter and $a = (a_{n-1}, dots, a_0)$ is fixed. Alternatively, we can consider $f(x) in mathbb R[x]$ with coefficients as linear functions over $mathbb R$
begin{align*}
f(x, r) = x^n + a_{n-1}(r) x^{n-1} + dots + a_0(r).
end{align*}
Since $r in mathbb R$, there exists $n$ continuous functions $b_1(r), dots, b_n(r)$ such that for each $r$, ${b_1(r), dots, b_n(r)}$ is the set of roots for $f(x,r)$ counting multiplicity. Now suppose for $r_0 in mathbb R$ and some $b in mathbb R$, $f(bi, r_0) = 0$ where $i$ denotes imaginary symbol. Further assume at $r_0$, $bi$ is a simple root. So at least locally around $r_0$ (if I am not mistaken), we should have a smooth function that tracks this root. Let us call this function $gamma(r)$.
My question is: is it possible that the curve $gamma(r)$ is tangent to the imaginary axis at $r_0$? Here is a plot to demonstrate what I have in mind. Note the plot is a parabola, but the shape is really not important. I only need the very local behavior about $r_0$.
This is related to a question I asked here Can roots of a polynomial stay on one side of the complex plane as the coefficients vary?
linear-algebra abstract-algebra algebraic-geometry polynomials
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let us consider a parametrized polynomial
begin{align*}
f(x, r) = x^n + ra_{n-1} x^{n-1} + dots + ra_0,
end{align*}
where $r in mathbb R$ is the parameter and $a = (a_{n-1}, dots, a_0)$ is fixed. Alternatively, we can consider $f(x) in mathbb R[x]$ with coefficients as linear functions over $mathbb R$
begin{align*}
f(x, r) = x^n + a_{n-1}(r) x^{n-1} + dots + a_0(r).
end{align*}
Since $r in mathbb R$, there exists $n$ continuous functions $b_1(r), dots, b_n(r)$ such that for each $r$, ${b_1(r), dots, b_n(r)}$ is the set of roots for $f(x,r)$ counting multiplicity. Now suppose for $r_0 in mathbb R$ and some $b in mathbb R$, $f(bi, r_0) = 0$ where $i$ denotes imaginary symbol. Further assume at $r_0$, $bi$ is a simple root. So at least locally around $r_0$ (if I am not mistaken), we should have a smooth function that tracks this root. Let us call this function $gamma(r)$.
My question is: is it possible that the curve $gamma(r)$ is tangent to the imaginary axis at $r_0$? Here is a plot to demonstrate what I have in mind. Note the plot is a parabola, but the shape is really not important. I only need the very local behavior about $r_0$.
This is related to a question I asked here Can roots of a polynomial stay on one side of the complex plane as the coefficients vary?
linear-algebra abstract-algebra algebraic-geometry polynomials
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let us consider a parametrized polynomial
begin{align*}
f(x, r) = x^n + ra_{n-1} x^{n-1} + dots + ra_0,
end{align*}
where $r in mathbb R$ is the parameter and $a = (a_{n-1}, dots, a_0)$ is fixed. Alternatively, we can consider $f(x) in mathbb R[x]$ with coefficients as linear functions over $mathbb R$
begin{align*}
f(x, r) = x^n + a_{n-1}(r) x^{n-1} + dots + a_0(r).
end{align*}
Since $r in mathbb R$, there exists $n$ continuous functions $b_1(r), dots, b_n(r)$ such that for each $r$, ${b_1(r), dots, b_n(r)}$ is the set of roots for $f(x,r)$ counting multiplicity. Now suppose for $r_0 in mathbb R$ and some $b in mathbb R$, $f(bi, r_0) = 0$ where $i$ denotes imaginary symbol. Further assume at $r_0$, $bi$ is a simple root. So at least locally around $r_0$ (if I am not mistaken), we should have a smooth function that tracks this root. Let us call this function $gamma(r)$.
My question is: is it possible that the curve $gamma(r)$ is tangent to the imaginary axis at $r_0$? Here is a plot to demonstrate what I have in mind. Note the plot is a parabola, but the shape is really not important. I only need the very local behavior about $r_0$.
This is related to a question I asked here Can roots of a polynomial stay on one side of the complex plane as the coefficients vary?
linear-algebra abstract-algebra algebraic-geometry polynomials
$endgroup$
Let us consider a parametrized polynomial
begin{align*}
f(x, r) = x^n + ra_{n-1} x^{n-1} + dots + ra_0,
end{align*}
where $r in mathbb R$ is the parameter and $a = (a_{n-1}, dots, a_0)$ is fixed. Alternatively, we can consider $f(x) in mathbb R[x]$ with coefficients as linear functions over $mathbb R$
begin{align*}
f(x, r) = x^n + a_{n-1}(r) x^{n-1} + dots + a_0(r).
end{align*}
Since $r in mathbb R$, there exists $n$ continuous functions $b_1(r), dots, b_n(r)$ such that for each $r$, ${b_1(r), dots, b_n(r)}$ is the set of roots for $f(x,r)$ counting multiplicity. Now suppose for $r_0 in mathbb R$ and some $b in mathbb R$, $f(bi, r_0) = 0$ where $i$ denotes imaginary symbol. Further assume at $r_0$, $bi$ is a simple root. So at least locally around $r_0$ (if I am not mistaken), we should have a smooth function that tracks this root. Let us call this function $gamma(r)$.
My question is: is it possible that the curve $gamma(r)$ is tangent to the imaginary axis at $r_0$? Here is a plot to demonstrate what I have in mind. Note the plot is a parabola, but the shape is really not important. I only need the very local behavior about $r_0$.
This is related to a question I asked here Can roots of a polynomial stay on one side of the complex plane as the coefficients vary?
linear-algebra abstract-algebra algebraic-geometry polynomials
linear-algebra abstract-algebra algebraic-geometry polynomials
edited Dec 6 '18 at 6:29
user1101010
asked Dec 6 '18 at 5:05
user1101010user1101010
7751730
7751730
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes, it is possible. Try
$$
p_r (x) = x^5+r(2x^4+5x^3+4x^2+4x+2).
$$Let $epsilon = r-1$ and write $p_r(x) = 0$ as
$$
x^5+2x^4+5x^3+4x^2+4x+2 = -epsilon (2x^4+5x^3+4x^2+4x+2)quadcdots (*).
$$ At $epsilon = 0$, we see that $x= i$ is a root of $(*)$. And a numerical plot shows that $gamma(1+epsilon)$ has a positive real part for all $epsilon$ with sufficiently small absolute value. You can check this easily on the web using https://www.wolframalpha.com/.
$textbf{EDIT:}$ Here's how I got this example. First, we can without loss of generality, assume that $r_0 = 1$ (through rescaling) and thus any such example is of the form of $(*)$:
$$
x^n + b_{n-1}x^{n-1} + cdots + b_1x + b_0 = -epsilon (b_{n-1}x^{n-1} + cdots + b_1x + b_0)=-epsilon Q(x)quadcdots(**).
$$ We can further assume that $x=i $ is a root of $(**)$ when $epsilon=0$. That is, $i^n + Q(i)=0$. Secondly, we have
$$
gamma(1+epsilon) = i -epsilon frac{Q(i)}{ni^{n-1}+ Q'(i)}+mathcal{o}(epsilon),
$$ and hence $gamma'(1) = -frac{Q(i)}{ni^{n-1}+ Q'(i)} =ibeta$ for some real $beta$. It is recommended to choose a high $n$ to produce such a plot in your figure. On the other hand, choosing a high $n$ produces too many coefficients to be determined. My choice was $n=5$. So, let $Q(x) = ax^4 + bx^3 + cx^2 +dx +e$ and do the calculation using $i + Q(i)=0$ and $-frac{Q(i)}{5+ Q'(i)} = frac{i}{5+ Q'(i)}=ibeta.$ This yields:
$$
(a-c+e) +i(-b+d+1) =0,
$$
$$
(-3b +d+5)+i(-4a+2c) =frac{1}{beta}=beta'.
$$ This gives restrictions on the coefficients:
$$
c=2a, e=a, d=b-1,
$$ and $a,b$ are free variables. Finally, choose arbitrary $(a,b)$ and execute the test whether it produces such a plot. You may be able to find many other examples using this method.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you. May I ask how you come up with the example? What's your thought process?
$endgroup$
– user1101010
Dec 6 '18 at 22:09
$begingroup$
Actually, it was a guess but a 'logical' guess partially based on my argument in your previous post math.stackexchange.com/questions/3006711/…. I'll edit my answer when I have time.
$endgroup$
– Song
Dec 6 '18 at 22:16
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3028057%2fcan-we-have-a-simple-root-of-real-polynomials-with-coefficients-as-linear-functi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes, it is possible. Try
$$
p_r (x) = x^5+r(2x^4+5x^3+4x^2+4x+2).
$$Let $epsilon = r-1$ and write $p_r(x) = 0$ as
$$
x^5+2x^4+5x^3+4x^2+4x+2 = -epsilon (2x^4+5x^3+4x^2+4x+2)quadcdots (*).
$$ At $epsilon = 0$, we see that $x= i$ is a root of $(*)$. And a numerical plot shows that $gamma(1+epsilon)$ has a positive real part for all $epsilon$ with sufficiently small absolute value. You can check this easily on the web using https://www.wolframalpha.com/.
$textbf{EDIT:}$ Here's how I got this example. First, we can without loss of generality, assume that $r_0 = 1$ (through rescaling) and thus any such example is of the form of $(*)$:
$$
x^n + b_{n-1}x^{n-1} + cdots + b_1x + b_0 = -epsilon (b_{n-1}x^{n-1} + cdots + b_1x + b_0)=-epsilon Q(x)quadcdots(**).
$$ We can further assume that $x=i $ is a root of $(**)$ when $epsilon=0$. That is, $i^n + Q(i)=0$. Secondly, we have
$$
gamma(1+epsilon) = i -epsilon frac{Q(i)}{ni^{n-1}+ Q'(i)}+mathcal{o}(epsilon),
$$ and hence $gamma'(1) = -frac{Q(i)}{ni^{n-1}+ Q'(i)} =ibeta$ for some real $beta$. It is recommended to choose a high $n$ to produce such a plot in your figure. On the other hand, choosing a high $n$ produces too many coefficients to be determined. My choice was $n=5$. So, let $Q(x) = ax^4 + bx^3 + cx^2 +dx +e$ and do the calculation using $i + Q(i)=0$ and $-frac{Q(i)}{5+ Q'(i)} = frac{i}{5+ Q'(i)}=ibeta.$ This yields:
$$
(a-c+e) +i(-b+d+1) =0,
$$
$$
(-3b +d+5)+i(-4a+2c) =frac{1}{beta}=beta'.
$$ This gives restrictions on the coefficients:
$$
c=2a, e=a, d=b-1,
$$ and $a,b$ are free variables. Finally, choose arbitrary $(a,b)$ and execute the test whether it produces such a plot. You may be able to find many other examples using this method.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you. May I ask how you come up with the example? What's your thought process?
$endgroup$
– user1101010
Dec 6 '18 at 22:09
$begingroup$
Actually, it was a guess but a 'logical' guess partially based on my argument in your previous post math.stackexchange.com/questions/3006711/…. I'll edit my answer when I have time.
$endgroup$
– Song
Dec 6 '18 at 22:16
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, it is possible. Try
$$
p_r (x) = x^5+r(2x^4+5x^3+4x^2+4x+2).
$$Let $epsilon = r-1$ and write $p_r(x) = 0$ as
$$
x^5+2x^4+5x^3+4x^2+4x+2 = -epsilon (2x^4+5x^3+4x^2+4x+2)quadcdots (*).
$$ At $epsilon = 0$, we see that $x= i$ is a root of $(*)$. And a numerical plot shows that $gamma(1+epsilon)$ has a positive real part for all $epsilon$ with sufficiently small absolute value. You can check this easily on the web using https://www.wolframalpha.com/.
$textbf{EDIT:}$ Here's how I got this example. First, we can without loss of generality, assume that $r_0 = 1$ (through rescaling) and thus any such example is of the form of $(*)$:
$$
x^n + b_{n-1}x^{n-1} + cdots + b_1x + b_0 = -epsilon (b_{n-1}x^{n-1} + cdots + b_1x + b_0)=-epsilon Q(x)quadcdots(**).
$$ We can further assume that $x=i $ is a root of $(**)$ when $epsilon=0$. That is, $i^n + Q(i)=0$. Secondly, we have
$$
gamma(1+epsilon) = i -epsilon frac{Q(i)}{ni^{n-1}+ Q'(i)}+mathcal{o}(epsilon),
$$ and hence $gamma'(1) = -frac{Q(i)}{ni^{n-1}+ Q'(i)} =ibeta$ for some real $beta$. It is recommended to choose a high $n$ to produce such a plot in your figure. On the other hand, choosing a high $n$ produces too many coefficients to be determined. My choice was $n=5$. So, let $Q(x) = ax^4 + bx^3 + cx^2 +dx +e$ and do the calculation using $i + Q(i)=0$ and $-frac{Q(i)}{5+ Q'(i)} = frac{i}{5+ Q'(i)}=ibeta.$ This yields:
$$
(a-c+e) +i(-b+d+1) =0,
$$
$$
(-3b +d+5)+i(-4a+2c) =frac{1}{beta}=beta'.
$$ This gives restrictions on the coefficients:
$$
c=2a, e=a, d=b-1,
$$ and $a,b$ are free variables. Finally, choose arbitrary $(a,b)$ and execute the test whether it produces such a plot. You may be able to find many other examples using this method.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you. May I ask how you come up with the example? What's your thought process?
$endgroup$
– user1101010
Dec 6 '18 at 22:09
$begingroup$
Actually, it was a guess but a 'logical' guess partially based on my argument in your previous post math.stackexchange.com/questions/3006711/…. I'll edit my answer when I have time.
$endgroup$
– Song
Dec 6 '18 at 22:16
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, it is possible. Try
$$
p_r (x) = x^5+r(2x^4+5x^3+4x^2+4x+2).
$$Let $epsilon = r-1$ and write $p_r(x) = 0$ as
$$
x^5+2x^4+5x^3+4x^2+4x+2 = -epsilon (2x^4+5x^3+4x^2+4x+2)quadcdots (*).
$$ At $epsilon = 0$, we see that $x= i$ is a root of $(*)$. And a numerical plot shows that $gamma(1+epsilon)$ has a positive real part for all $epsilon$ with sufficiently small absolute value. You can check this easily on the web using https://www.wolframalpha.com/.
$textbf{EDIT:}$ Here's how I got this example. First, we can without loss of generality, assume that $r_0 = 1$ (through rescaling) and thus any such example is of the form of $(*)$:
$$
x^n + b_{n-1}x^{n-1} + cdots + b_1x + b_0 = -epsilon (b_{n-1}x^{n-1} + cdots + b_1x + b_0)=-epsilon Q(x)quadcdots(**).
$$ We can further assume that $x=i $ is a root of $(**)$ when $epsilon=0$. That is, $i^n + Q(i)=0$. Secondly, we have
$$
gamma(1+epsilon) = i -epsilon frac{Q(i)}{ni^{n-1}+ Q'(i)}+mathcal{o}(epsilon),
$$ and hence $gamma'(1) = -frac{Q(i)}{ni^{n-1}+ Q'(i)} =ibeta$ for some real $beta$. It is recommended to choose a high $n$ to produce such a plot in your figure. On the other hand, choosing a high $n$ produces too many coefficients to be determined. My choice was $n=5$. So, let $Q(x) = ax^4 + bx^3 + cx^2 +dx +e$ and do the calculation using $i + Q(i)=0$ and $-frac{Q(i)}{5+ Q'(i)} = frac{i}{5+ Q'(i)}=ibeta.$ This yields:
$$
(a-c+e) +i(-b+d+1) =0,
$$
$$
(-3b +d+5)+i(-4a+2c) =frac{1}{beta}=beta'.
$$ This gives restrictions on the coefficients:
$$
c=2a, e=a, d=b-1,
$$ and $a,b$ are free variables. Finally, choose arbitrary $(a,b)$ and execute the test whether it produces such a plot. You may be able to find many other examples using this method.
$endgroup$
Yes, it is possible. Try
$$
p_r (x) = x^5+r(2x^4+5x^3+4x^2+4x+2).
$$Let $epsilon = r-1$ and write $p_r(x) = 0$ as
$$
x^5+2x^4+5x^3+4x^2+4x+2 = -epsilon (2x^4+5x^3+4x^2+4x+2)quadcdots (*).
$$ At $epsilon = 0$, we see that $x= i$ is a root of $(*)$. And a numerical plot shows that $gamma(1+epsilon)$ has a positive real part for all $epsilon$ with sufficiently small absolute value. You can check this easily on the web using https://www.wolframalpha.com/.
$textbf{EDIT:}$ Here's how I got this example. First, we can without loss of generality, assume that $r_0 = 1$ (through rescaling) and thus any such example is of the form of $(*)$:
$$
x^n + b_{n-1}x^{n-1} + cdots + b_1x + b_0 = -epsilon (b_{n-1}x^{n-1} + cdots + b_1x + b_0)=-epsilon Q(x)quadcdots(**).
$$ We can further assume that $x=i $ is a root of $(**)$ when $epsilon=0$. That is, $i^n + Q(i)=0$. Secondly, we have
$$
gamma(1+epsilon) = i -epsilon frac{Q(i)}{ni^{n-1}+ Q'(i)}+mathcal{o}(epsilon),
$$ and hence $gamma'(1) = -frac{Q(i)}{ni^{n-1}+ Q'(i)} =ibeta$ for some real $beta$. It is recommended to choose a high $n$ to produce such a plot in your figure. On the other hand, choosing a high $n$ produces too many coefficients to be determined. My choice was $n=5$. So, let $Q(x) = ax^4 + bx^3 + cx^2 +dx +e$ and do the calculation using $i + Q(i)=0$ and $-frac{Q(i)}{5+ Q'(i)} = frac{i}{5+ Q'(i)}=ibeta.$ This yields:
$$
(a-c+e) +i(-b+d+1) =0,
$$
$$
(-3b +d+5)+i(-4a+2c) =frac{1}{beta}=beta'.
$$ This gives restrictions on the coefficients:
$$
c=2a, e=a, d=b-1,
$$ and $a,b$ are free variables. Finally, choose arbitrary $(a,b)$ and execute the test whether it produces such a plot. You may be able to find many other examples using this method.
edited Dec 6 '18 at 23:10
answered Dec 6 '18 at 9:40
SongSong
10.4k627
10.4k627
$begingroup$
Thank you. May I ask how you come up with the example? What's your thought process?
$endgroup$
– user1101010
Dec 6 '18 at 22:09
$begingroup$
Actually, it was a guess but a 'logical' guess partially based on my argument in your previous post math.stackexchange.com/questions/3006711/…. I'll edit my answer when I have time.
$endgroup$
– Song
Dec 6 '18 at 22:16
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you. May I ask how you come up with the example? What's your thought process?
$endgroup$
– user1101010
Dec 6 '18 at 22:09
$begingroup$
Actually, it was a guess but a 'logical' guess partially based on my argument in your previous post math.stackexchange.com/questions/3006711/…. I'll edit my answer when I have time.
$endgroup$
– Song
Dec 6 '18 at 22:16
$begingroup$
Thank you. May I ask how you come up with the example? What's your thought process?
$endgroup$
– user1101010
Dec 6 '18 at 22:09
$begingroup$
Thank you. May I ask how you come up with the example? What's your thought process?
$endgroup$
– user1101010
Dec 6 '18 at 22:09
$begingroup$
Actually, it was a guess but a 'logical' guess partially based on my argument in your previous post math.stackexchange.com/questions/3006711/…. I'll edit my answer when I have time.
$endgroup$
– Song
Dec 6 '18 at 22:16
$begingroup$
Actually, it was a guess but a 'logical' guess partially based on my argument in your previous post math.stackexchange.com/questions/3006711/…. I'll edit my answer when I have time.
$endgroup$
– Song
Dec 6 '18 at 22:16
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3028057%2fcan-we-have-a-simple-root-of-real-polynomials-with-coefficients-as-linear-functi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown