“Restriction” map in group homology, what was meant? Rotman











up vote
0
down vote

favorite













Def 1: $alpha:G rightarrow G'$, group homomorphism. If $A'$ is a $G'$ module $f:A rightarrow A'$ is a $Bbb Z$ map we call $(alpha, f)$ a compatible pair if $f:A rightarrow _{alpha}A'$ is a $G$-map, where $_{alpha} A'$ is $G$-module given by map $alpha$.



Def 2: There is an induced map
$$(alpha,f)_*: H_n(G,A) rightarrow H_n(G',A')$$




I am confused with how the map is in fact constructed. Rotman outlines as follows:




Let $P_* rightarrow Bbb Z$ be a $G$-projective resolution of $Bbb Z$. $P'_* rightarrow Bbb Z$ be a $G'$ projective resolution of $Bbb Z$. The functor $U:_{Bbb Z G'} Mod rightarrow _{Bbb Z G} Mod$ the change of groups functor (using $alpha$), gives an acyclic $G$-complex, $$UP'_* rightarrow Bbb Z$$
The comparison theorem gives a map
$$ UP'_* rightarrow P_* $$
over $1_{Bbb Z}$. We apply the functor $-otimes_G A$ [Rotman wrote $-otimes_G {}_{alpha} A$ which does not make sense].Then this gives
$$ tau: UP'_* otimes_G A rightarrow P_* otimes_G A$$
$f:A rightarrow {}_{alpha} A'$ induces a chain map
$$f_*: P_* otimes _G A rightarrow P_* otimes_G {}_{alpha} A' $$






Then nothing makes sense for me






$$f_*tau_* : UP'_* otimes _G A rightarrow P_*otimes_G {}_{alpha} A' $$
Considering homology induces
$$H_n(G,A) rightarrow H_n(G',A').$$




How so?










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite













    Def 1: $alpha:G rightarrow G'$, group homomorphism. If $A'$ is a $G'$ module $f:A rightarrow A'$ is a $Bbb Z$ map we call $(alpha, f)$ a compatible pair if $f:A rightarrow _{alpha}A'$ is a $G$-map, where $_{alpha} A'$ is $G$-module given by map $alpha$.



    Def 2: There is an induced map
    $$(alpha,f)_*: H_n(G,A) rightarrow H_n(G',A')$$




    I am confused with how the map is in fact constructed. Rotman outlines as follows:




    Let $P_* rightarrow Bbb Z$ be a $G$-projective resolution of $Bbb Z$. $P'_* rightarrow Bbb Z$ be a $G'$ projective resolution of $Bbb Z$. The functor $U:_{Bbb Z G'} Mod rightarrow _{Bbb Z G} Mod$ the change of groups functor (using $alpha$), gives an acyclic $G$-complex, $$UP'_* rightarrow Bbb Z$$
    The comparison theorem gives a map
    $$ UP'_* rightarrow P_* $$
    over $1_{Bbb Z}$. We apply the functor $-otimes_G A$ [Rotman wrote $-otimes_G {}_{alpha} A$ which does not make sense].Then this gives
    $$ tau: UP'_* otimes_G A rightarrow P_* otimes_G A$$
    $f:A rightarrow {}_{alpha} A'$ induces a chain map
    $$f_*: P_* otimes _G A rightarrow P_* otimes_G {}_{alpha} A' $$






    Then nothing makes sense for me






    $$f_*tau_* : UP'_* otimes _G A rightarrow P_*otimes_G {}_{alpha} A' $$
    Considering homology induces
    $$H_n(G,A) rightarrow H_n(G',A').$$




    How so?










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite












      Def 1: $alpha:G rightarrow G'$, group homomorphism. If $A'$ is a $G'$ module $f:A rightarrow A'$ is a $Bbb Z$ map we call $(alpha, f)$ a compatible pair if $f:A rightarrow _{alpha}A'$ is a $G$-map, where $_{alpha} A'$ is $G$-module given by map $alpha$.



      Def 2: There is an induced map
      $$(alpha,f)_*: H_n(G,A) rightarrow H_n(G',A')$$




      I am confused with how the map is in fact constructed. Rotman outlines as follows:




      Let $P_* rightarrow Bbb Z$ be a $G$-projective resolution of $Bbb Z$. $P'_* rightarrow Bbb Z$ be a $G'$ projective resolution of $Bbb Z$. The functor $U:_{Bbb Z G'} Mod rightarrow _{Bbb Z G} Mod$ the change of groups functor (using $alpha$), gives an acyclic $G$-complex, $$UP'_* rightarrow Bbb Z$$
      The comparison theorem gives a map
      $$ UP'_* rightarrow P_* $$
      over $1_{Bbb Z}$. We apply the functor $-otimes_G A$ [Rotman wrote $-otimes_G {}_{alpha} A$ which does not make sense].Then this gives
      $$ tau: UP'_* otimes_G A rightarrow P_* otimes_G A$$
      $f:A rightarrow {}_{alpha} A'$ induces a chain map
      $$f_*: P_* otimes _G A rightarrow P_* otimes_G {}_{alpha} A' $$






      Then nothing makes sense for me






      $$f_*tau_* : UP'_* otimes _G A rightarrow P_*otimes_G {}_{alpha} A' $$
      Considering homology induces
      $$H_n(G,A) rightarrow H_n(G',A').$$




      How so?










      share|cite|improve this question














      Def 1: $alpha:G rightarrow G'$, group homomorphism. If $A'$ is a $G'$ module $f:A rightarrow A'$ is a $Bbb Z$ map we call $(alpha, f)$ a compatible pair if $f:A rightarrow _{alpha}A'$ is a $G$-map, where $_{alpha} A'$ is $G$-module given by map $alpha$.



      Def 2: There is an induced map
      $$(alpha,f)_*: H_n(G,A) rightarrow H_n(G',A')$$




      I am confused with how the map is in fact constructed. Rotman outlines as follows:




      Let $P_* rightarrow Bbb Z$ be a $G$-projective resolution of $Bbb Z$. $P'_* rightarrow Bbb Z$ be a $G'$ projective resolution of $Bbb Z$. The functor $U:_{Bbb Z G'} Mod rightarrow _{Bbb Z G} Mod$ the change of groups functor (using $alpha$), gives an acyclic $G$-complex, $$UP'_* rightarrow Bbb Z$$
      The comparison theorem gives a map
      $$ UP'_* rightarrow P_* $$
      over $1_{Bbb Z}$. We apply the functor $-otimes_G A$ [Rotman wrote $-otimes_G {}_{alpha} A$ which does not make sense].Then this gives
      $$ tau: UP'_* otimes_G A rightarrow P_* otimes_G A$$
      $f:A rightarrow {}_{alpha} A'$ induces a chain map
      $$f_*: P_* otimes _G A rightarrow P_* otimes_G {}_{alpha} A' $$






      Then nothing makes sense for me






      $$f_*tau_* : UP'_* otimes _G A rightarrow P_*otimes_G {}_{alpha} A' $$
      Considering homology induces
      $$H_n(G,A) rightarrow H_n(G',A').$$




      How so?







      homology-cohomology homological-algebra group-cohomology






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 14 at 22:09









      CL.

      2,0352822




      2,0352822



























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998895%2frestriction-map-in-group-homology-what-was-meant-rotman%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown






























          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded



















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998895%2frestriction-map-in-group-homology-what-was-meant-rotman%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Index of /

          Tribalistas

          Listed building