Books that state column vectors are linearly dependent if determinant is $0$?
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am looking for some linear algebra books that contain the below proposition:
If a matrix over an arbitrary vector space $V$ and base field $mathbb{F}$ that has determinant $0$ if the columns are linearly dependent.
In that form or something close to it. By this, I mean that the book actually states the above in a proposition or maybe as a combination of $2$ side by side lemmas (without the reader required to his own logic).
Edit:
I know how to prove this fact, and where the proof comes from, etc. but, long story short, I just need to find some book that states something similar to this succinctly (even without proof is fine).
reference-request book-recommendation
This question has an open bounty worth +50
reputation from mtheorylord ending in 12 hours.
The current answers do not contain enough detail.
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am looking for some linear algebra books that contain the below proposition:
If a matrix over an arbitrary vector space $V$ and base field $mathbb{F}$ that has determinant $0$ if the columns are linearly dependent.
In that form or something close to it. By this, I mean that the book actually states the above in a proposition or maybe as a combination of $2$ side by side lemmas (without the reader required to his own logic).
Edit:
I know how to prove this fact, and where the proof comes from, etc. but, long story short, I just need to find some book that states something similar to this succinctly (even without proof is fine).
reference-request book-recommendation
This question has an open bounty worth +50
reputation from mtheorylord ending in 12 hours.
The current answers do not contain enough detail.
1
You are missing a number of key words such as how the matrix must be square and you use 'if' when you should have used 'iff'... but yes, this is one of the many equivalent statements in the invertible matrix theorem. Just about every introductory linear algebra textbook (with at least some proof writing component) will have a proof for the result where the field is real numbers or has this as an exercise for the reader, and can be sufficiently generalized to work as a proof for arbitrary vector spaces and fields.
– JMoravitz
Nov 14 at 22:46
1
I know no book with that statement: it follows directly from many other things.
– DonAntonio
Nov 14 at 22:47
You can show it yourself, assuming some other known fact. For example, for square $A $, the determinant is non-zero iff $A $ is invertible. This happens iff $Ax=0$ has only the trivial solution $x=0$. The columns are lin indep iff the only solution to the above equation is the trivial solution (Check!)
– AnyAD
Nov 14 at 23:16
2
Why do you specifically need a book that explicitly says it? Certainly noone needs a citation to a book that explicitly says that $101times 99 = 9999$ to be able to use the information in a report... you can show it yourself or allude to the fact that every reader with the expected amount of prerequisite skill to be reading your paper should be able to show it themselves. It shouldn't be explicitly necessary here either.
– JMoravitz
Nov 14 at 23:36
1
@JMoravitz I made a sort of bet, it's a pretty long story. I let you guys in on it if I can find this fact somewhere.
– mtheorylord
Nov 14 at 23:53
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am looking for some linear algebra books that contain the below proposition:
If a matrix over an arbitrary vector space $V$ and base field $mathbb{F}$ that has determinant $0$ if the columns are linearly dependent.
In that form or something close to it. By this, I mean that the book actually states the above in a proposition or maybe as a combination of $2$ side by side lemmas (without the reader required to his own logic).
Edit:
I know how to prove this fact, and where the proof comes from, etc. but, long story short, I just need to find some book that states something similar to this succinctly (even without proof is fine).
reference-request book-recommendation
I am looking for some linear algebra books that contain the below proposition:
If a matrix over an arbitrary vector space $V$ and base field $mathbb{F}$ that has determinant $0$ if the columns are linearly dependent.
In that form or something close to it. By this, I mean that the book actually states the above in a proposition or maybe as a combination of $2$ side by side lemmas (without the reader required to his own logic).
Edit:
I know how to prove this fact, and where the proof comes from, etc. but, long story short, I just need to find some book that states something similar to this succinctly (even without proof is fine).
reference-request book-recommendation
reference-request book-recommendation
edited Nov 17 at 19:07
asked Nov 14 at 22:38
mtheorylord
1,751625
1,751625
This question has an open bounty worth +50
reputation from mtheorylord ending in 12 hours.
The current answers do not contain enough detail.
This question has an open bounty worth +50
reputation from mtheorylord ending in 12 hours.
The current answers do not contain enough detail.
1
You are missing a number of key words such as how the matrix must be square and you use 'if' when you should have used 'iff'... but yes, this is one of the many equivalent statements in the invertible matrix theorem. Just about every introductory linear algebra textbook (with at least some proof writing component) will have a proof for the result where the field is real numbers or has this as an exercise for the reader, and can be sufficiently generalized to work as a proof for arbitrary vector spaces and fields.
– JMoravitz
Nov 14 at 22:46
1
I know no book with that statement: it follows directly from many other things.
– DonAntonio
Nov 14 at 22:47
You can show it yourself, assuming some other known fact. For example, for square $A $, the determinant is non-zero iff $A $ is invertible. This happens iff $Ax=0$ has only the trivial solution $x=0$. The columns are lin indep iff the only solution to the above equation is the trivial solution (Check!)
– AnyAD
Nov 14 at 23:16
2
Why do you specifically need a book that explicitly says it? Certainly noone needs a citation to a book that explicitly says that $101times 99 = 9999$ to be able to use the information in a report... you can show it yourself or allude to the fact that every reader with the expected amount of prerequisite skill to be reading your paper should be able to show it themselves. It shouldn't be explicitly necessary here either.
– JMoravitz
Nov 14 at 23:36
1
@JMoravitz I made a sort of bet, it's a pretty long story. I let you guys in on it if I can find this fact somewhere.
– mtheorylord
Nov 14 at 23:53
|
show 3 more comments
1
You are missing a number of key words such as how the matrix must be square and you use 'if' when you should have used 'iff'... but yes, this is one of the many equivalent statements in the invertible matrix theorem. Just about every introductory linear algebra textbook (with at least some proof writing component) will have a proof for the result where the field is real numbers or has this as an exercise for the reader, and can be sufficiently generalized to work as a proof for arbitrary vector spaces and fields.
– JMoravitz
Nov 14 at 22:46
1
I know no book with that statement: it follows directly from many other things.
– DonAntonio
Nov 14 at 22:47
You can show it yourself, assuming some other known fact. For example, for square $A $, the determinant is non-zero iff $A $ is invertible. This happens iff $Ax=0$ has only the trivial solution $x=0$. The columns are lin indep iff the only solution to the above equation is the trivial solution (Check!)
– AnyAD
Nov 14 at 23:16
2
Why do you specifically need a book that explicitly says it? Certainly noone needs a citation to a book that explicitly says that $101times 99 = 9999$ to be able to use the information in a report... you can show it yourself or allude to the fact that every reader with the expected amount of prerequisite skill to be reading your paper should be able to show it themselves. It shouldn't be explicitly necessary here either.
– JMoravitz
Nov 14 at 23:36
1
@JMoravitz I made a sort of bet, it's a pretty long story. I let you guys in on it if I can find this fact somewhere.
– mtheorylord
Nov 14 at 23:53
1
1
You are missing a number of key words such as how the matrix must be square and you use 'if' when you should have used 'iff'... but yes, this is one of the many equivalent statements in the invertible matrix theorem. Just about every introductory linear algebra textbook (with at least some proof writing component) will have a proof for the result where the field is real numbers or has this as an exercise for the reader, and can be sufficiently generalized to work as a proof for arbitrary vector spaces and fields.
– JMoravitz
Nov 14 at 22:46
You are missing a number of key words such as how the matrix must be square and you use 'if' when you should have used 'iff'... but yes, this is one of the many equivalent statements in the invertible matrix theorem. Just about every introductory linear algebra textbook (with at least some proof writing component) will have a proof for the result where the field is real numbers or has this as an exercise for the reader, and can be sufficiently generalized to work as a proof for arbitrary vector spaces and fields.
– JMoravitz
Nov 14 at 22:46
1
1
I know no book with that statement: it follows directly from many other things.
– DonAntonio
Nov 14 at 22:47
I know no book with that statement: it follows directly from many other things.
– DonAntonio
Nov 14 at 22:47
You can show it yourself, assuming some other known fact. For example, for square $A $, the determinant is non-zero iff $A $ is invertible. This happens iff $Ax=0$ has only the trivial solution $x=0$. The columns are lin indep iff the only solution to the above equation is the trivial solution (Check!)
– AnyAD
Nov 14 at 23:16
You can show it yourself, assuming some other known fact. For example, for square $A $, the determinant is non-zero iff $A $ is invertible. This happens iff $Ax=0$ has only the trivial solution $x=0$. The columns are lin indep iff the only solution to the above equation is the trivial solution (Check!)
– AnyAD
Nov 14 at 23:16
2
2
Why do you specifically need a book that explicitly says it? Certainly noone needs a citation to a book that explicitly says that $101times 99 = 9999$ to be able to use the information in a report... you can show it yourself or allude to the fact that every reader with the expected amount of prerequisite skill to be reading your paper should be able to show it themselves. It shouldn't be explicitly necessary here either.
– JMoravitz
Nov 14 at 23:36
Why do you specifically need a book that explicitly says it? Certainly noone needs a citation to a book that explicitly says that $101times 99 = 9999$ to be able to use the information in a report... you can show it yourself or allude to the fact that every reader with the expected amount of prerequisite skill to be reading your paper should be able to show it themselves. It shouldn't be explicitly necessary here either.
– JMoravitz
Nov 14 at 23:36
1
1
@JMoravitz I made a sort of bet, it's a pretty long story. I let you guys in on it if I can find this fact somewhere.
– mtheorylord
Nov 14 at 23:53
@JMoravitz I made a sort of bet, it's a pretty long story. I let you guys in on it if I can find this fact somewhere.
– mtheorylord
Nov 14 at 23:53
|
show 3 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Does the following book help you?
https://www.amazon.com/Linear-Algebra-2nd-Kenneth-Hoffman/dp/0135367972
Please inform me whether it was helpful or I should delete the answer.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Linear Algebra 1, Martin Otto, Winter Term 2013/14, Definition 2.4.5
New contributor
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Does the following book help you?
https://www.amazon.com/Linear-Algebra-2nd-Kenneth-Hoffman/dp/0135367972
Please inform me whether it was helpful or I should delete the answer.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Does the following book help you?
https://www.amazon.com/Linear-Algebra-2nd-Kenneth-Hoffman/dp/0135367972
Please inform me whether it was helpful or I should delete the answer.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Does the following book help you?
https://www.amazon.com/Linear-Algebra-2nd-Kenneth-Hoffman/dp/0135367972
Please inform me whether it was helpful or I should delete the answer.
Does the following book help you?
https://www.amazon.com/Linear-Algebra-2nd-Kenneth-Hoffman/dp/0135367972
Please inform me whether it was helpful or I should delete the answer.
answered 2 days ago
Mostafa Ayaz
12k3733
12k3733
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Linear Algebra 1, Martin Otto, Winter Term 2013/14, Definition 2.4.5
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Linear Algebra 1, Martin Otto, Winter Term 2013/14, Definition 2.4.5
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Linear Algebra 1, Martin Otto, Winter Term 2013/14, Definition 2.4.5
New contributor
Linear Algebra 1, Martin Otto, Winter Term 2013/14, Definition 2.4.5
New contributor
New contributor
answered 37 mins ago
multicusp
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998919%2fbooks-that-state-column-vectors-are-linearly-dependent-if-determinant-is-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
You are missing a number of key words such as how the matrix must be square and you use 'if' when you should have used 'iff'... but yes, this is one of the many equivalent statements in the invertible matrix theorem. Just about every introductory linear algebra textbook (with at least some proof writing component) will have a proof for the result where the field is real numbers or has this as an exercise for the reader, and can be sufficiently generalized to work as a proof for arbitrary vector spaces and fields.
– JMoravitz
Nov 14 at 22:46
1
I know no book with that statement: it follows directly from many other things.
– DonAntonio
Nov 14 at 22:47
You can show it yourself, assuming some other known fact. For example, for square $A $, the determinant is non-zero iff $A $ is invertible. This happens iff $Ax=0$ has only the trivial solution $x=0$. The columns are lin indep iff the only solution to the above equation is the trivial solution (Check!)
– AnyAD
Nov 14 at 23:16
2
Why do you specifically need a book that explicitly says it? Certainly noone needs a citation to a book that explicitly says that $101times 99 = 9999$ to be able to use the information in a report... you can show it yourself or allude to the fact that every reader with the expected amount of prerequisite skill to be reading your paper should be able to show it themselves. It shouldn't be explicitly necessary here either.
– JMoravitz
Nov 14 at 23:36
1
@JMoravitz I made a sort of bet, it's a pretty long story. I let you guys in on it if I can find this fact somewhere.
– mtheorylord
Nov 14 at 23:53