prove that the tangent line orthogonal to a line











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












suppose $(x_0,y_0)$ is a point on some curve $g(t):R->R_2$ that is Closest to a point $(x_1,y_1)$ NOT on the curve .



show that the line through $(x_0,y_0)$ and $(x_1,y_1)$ is orthogonal to the tangent line to the curve at the point $(x_0,y_0)$



really though question i have tried everything



let $g(t) = (x(t) , y(t))$



$g'(t) = (x'(t),y'(t))$



so we can say that the tangent line $(x_0,y_0) + s(x',y')$
and the line that passes through the points : $(x_0,y_0)+k(x_1-x_0,y_1-y_0)$



and we need to prove that those lines orthogonals , i tried dot product equals to 0 but i always find that i miss something to prove.



i am sure that this missing clue is that we need to use the fact that this 2 points are the closest to each other and that no other point ON THE CURVE is closer.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    What is $R_2$ here? Is it $mathbf{R}^2$?
    – PSG
    Nov 13 at 10:40










  • true its R2 like you wrote a vector with 2 coordinates
    – Razi Awad
    Nov 13 at 10:45






  • 1




    It's a minimization problem. $(x_0, y_0)$ is the point that minimizes $(x-x_1)^2+(y-y_1)^2$ for $(x,y)$ on the curve.
    – saulspatz
    Nov 13 at 10:48












  • the problem given as a calculas question
    – Razi Awad
    Nov 13 at 10:50










  • wait what ! i had an idea now lets say that the point (x1,y1) is a center of a circule with radius squrt((x−x1)2+(y−y1)2) that is the minimum distance given by the question . so the question become trivial right ? because the radius is always orthogonal to the tangent of a circule
    – Razi Awad
    Nov 13 at 10:54















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












suppose $(x_0,y_0)$ is a point on some curve $g(t):R->R_2$ that is Closest to a point $(x_1,y_1)$ NOT on the curve .



show that the line through $(x_0,y_0)$ and $(x_1,y_1)$ is orthogonal to the tangent line to the curve at the point $(x_0,y_0)$



really though question i have tried everything



let $g(t) = (x(t) , y(t))$



$g'(t) = (x'(t),y'(t))$



so we can say that the tangent line $(x_0,y_0) + s(x',y')$
and the line that passes through the points : $(x_0,y_0)+k(x_1-x_0,y_1-y_0)$



and we need to prove that those lines orthogonals , i tried dot product equals to 0 but i always find that i miss something to prove.



i am sure that this missing clue is that we need to use the fact that this 2 points are the closest to each other and that no other point ON THE CURVE is closer.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    What is $R_2$ here? Is it $mathbf{R}^2$?
    – PSG
    Nov 13 at 10:40










  • true its R2 like you wrote a vector with 2 coordinates
    – Razi Awad
    Nov 13 at 10:45






  • 1




    It's a minimization problem. $(x_0, y_0)$ is the point that minimizes $(x-x_1)^2+(y-y_1)^2$ for $(x,y)$ on the curve.
    – saulspatz
    Nov 13 at 10:48












  • the problem given as a calculas question
    – Razi Awad
    Nov 13 at 10:50










  • wait what ! i had an idea now lets say that the point (x1,y1) is a center of a circule with radius squrt((x−x1)2+(y−y1)2) that is the minimum distance given by the question . so the question become trivial right ? because the radius is always orthogonal to the tangent of a circule
    – Razi Awad
    Nov 13 at 10:54













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











suppose $(x_0,y_0)$ is a point on some curve $g(t):R->R_2$ that is Closest to a point $(x_1,y_1)$ NOT on the curve .



show that the line through $(x_0,y_0)$ and $(x_1,y_1)$ is orthogonal to the tangent line to the curve at the point $(x_0,y_0)$



really though question i have tried everything



let $g(t) = (x(t) , y(t))$



$g'(t) = (x'(t),y'(t))$



so we can say that the tangent line $(x_0,y_0) + s(x',y')$
and the line that passes through the points : $(x_0,y_0)+k(x_1-x_0,y_1-y_0)$



and we need to prove that those lines orthogonals , i tried dot product equals to 0 but i always find that i miss something to prove.



i am sure that this missing clue is that we need to use the fact that this 2 points are the closest to each other and that no other point ON THE CURVE is closer.










share|cite|improve this question















suppose $(x_0,y_0)$ is a point on some curve $g(t):R->R_2$ that is Closest to a point $(x_1,y_1)$ NOT on the curve .



show that the line through $(x_0,y_0)$ and $(x_1,y_1)$ is orthogonal to the tangent line to the curve at the point $(x_0,y_0)$



really though question i have tried everything



let $g(t) = (x(t) , y(t))$



$g'(t) = (x'(t),y'(t))$



so we can say that the tangent line $(x_0,y_0) + s(x',y')$
and the line that passes through the points : $(x_0,y_0)+k(x_1-x_0,y_1-y_0)$



and we need to prove that those lines orthogonals , i tried dot product equals to 0 but i always find that i miss something to prove.



i am sure that this missing clue is that we need to use the fact that this 2 points are the closest to each other and that no other point ON THE CURVE is closer.







orthogonality






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 13 at 10:30









Alucsard

132




132










asked Nov 13 at 10:26









Razi Awad

236




236








  • 1




    What is $R_2$ here? Is it $mathbf{R}^2$?
    – PSG
    Nov 13 at 10:40










  • true its R2 like you wrote a vector with 2 coordinates
    – Razi Awad
    Nov 13 at 10:45






  • 1




    It's a minimization problem. $(x_0, y_0)$ is the point that minimizes $(x-x_1)^2+(y-y_1)^2$ for $(x,y)$ on the curve.
    – saulspatz
    Nov 13 at 10:48












  • the problem given as a calculas question
    – Razi Awad
    Nov 13 at 10:50










  • wait what ! i had an idea now lets say that the point (x1,y1) is a center of a circule with radius squrt((x−x1)2+(y−y1)2) that is the minimum distance given by the question . so the question become trivial right ? because the radius is always orthogonal to the tangent of a circule
    – Razi Awad
    Nov 13 at 10:54














  • 1




    What is $R_2$ here? Is it $mathbf{R}^2$?
    – PSG
    Nov 13 at 10:40










  • true its R2 like you wrote a vector with 2 coordinates
    – Razi Awad
    Nov 13 at 10:45






  • 1




    It's a minimization problem. $(x_0, y_0)$ is the point that minimizes $(x-x_1)^2+(y-y_1)^2$ for $(x,y)$ on the curve.
    – saulspatz
    Nov 13 at 10:48












  • the problem given as a calculas question
    – Razi Awad
    Nov 13 at 10:50










  • wait what ! i had an idea now lets say that the point (x1,y1) is a center of a circule with radius squrt((x−x1)2+(y−y1)2) that is the minimum distance given by the question . so the question become trivial right ? because the radius is always orthogonal to the tangent of a circule
    – Razi Awad
    Nov 13 at 10:54








1




1




What is $R_2$ here? Is it $mathbf{R}^2$?
– PSG
Nov 13 at 10:40




What is $R_2$ here? Is it $mathbf{R}^2$?
– PSG
Nov 13 at 10:40












true its R2 like you wrote a vector with 2 coordinates
– Razi Awad
Nov 13 at 10:45




true its R2 like you wrote a vector with 2 coordinates
– Razi Awad
Nov 13 at 10:45




1




1




It's a minimization problem. $(x_0, y_0)$ is the point that minimizes $(x-x_1)^2+(y-y_1)^2$ for $(x,y)$ on the curve.
– saulspatz
Nov 13 at 10:48






It's a minimization problem. $(x_0, y_0)$ is the point that minimizes $(x-x_1)^2+(y-y_1)^2$ for $(x,y)$ on the curve.
– saulspatz
Nov 13 at 10:48














the problem given as a calculas question
– Razi Awad
Nov 13 at 10:50




the problem given as a calculas question
– Razi Awad
Nov 13 at 10:50












wait what ! i had an idea now lets say that the point (x1,y1) is a center of a circule with radius squrt((x−x1)2+(y−y1)2) that is the minimum distance given by the question . so the question become trivial right ? because the radius is always orthogonal to the tangent of a circule
– Razi Awad
Nov 13 at 10:54




wait what ! i had an idea now lets say that the point (x1,y1) is a center of a circule with radius squrt((x−x1)2+(y−y1)2) that is the minimum distance given by the question . so the question become trivial right ? because the radius is always orthogonal to the tangent of a circule
– Razi Awad
Nov 13 at 10:54










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










Your attempted solution is incorrect. Firstly, the closest-point condition is not sufficient to imply that the curve is differentiable there. So the question actually must have that extra condition. Secondly, you wrongly assumed that the curve is a graph of $(x,y)$ where $y$ is some function of $x$. That was not given.
$
deflfrac#1#2{{largefrac{#1}{#2}}}
$





Let me use variables $x,y$ instead of $x_0,y_0$, varying with parameter $t$. We can also assume that $x_1 = y_1 = 0$.



Let $r = x^2+y^2$. Consider any point on the curve (specified by parameter $t$ and coordinates $x,y$). As $Δt to 0$ we have $lfrac{Δr}{Δt} = lfrac{((x+Δx)^2+(y+Δy)^2) - (x^2+y^2)}{Δt}$ $= 2(xlfrac{Δx}{Δt}+ylfrac{Δy}{Δt}) + (Δxlfrac{Δx}{Δt}+Δylfrac{Δy}{Δt})$. If the curve is differentiable there, then we also have $Δx,Δy approx 0$ and $lfrac{Δx}{Δt} approx lfrac{dx}{dt}$ and $lfrac{Δy}{Δt} approx lfrac{dy}{dt}$, and so $lfrac{Δr}{Δt} approx 2(xlfrac{dx}{dt}+ylfrac{dy}{dt})$, and hence $lfrac{dr}{dt} = 2(xlfrac{dx}{dt}+ylfrac{dy}{dt})$. If moreover $r$ is minimum there, then $lfrac{dr}{dt} = 0$, and so $xlfrac{dx}{dt}+ylfrac{dy}{dt} = 0$, equivalently $(x,y)·(lfrac{dx}{dt},lfrac{dy}{dt}) = 0$, and hence $(x,y)$ and $(lfrac{dx}{dt},lfrac{dy}{dt})$ are orthogonal.



Note that $(x,y)$ and $(lfrac{dx}{dt},lfrac{dy}{dt})$ are orthogonal if and only if they are perpendicular or one of them is zero. So there is actually no need for the question to state that $(x_1,y_1)$ is not on the curve. If you really want to get perpendicularity, even that condition is insufficient; you also have to add an extra condition that the curve's derivative at that point is nonzero. Otherwise it is possible that $(lfrac{dx}{dt},lfrac{dy}{dt})$ is zero (the point tracing the curve stops momentarily) but there is no (geometric) tangent there; for example $(cos(t)+sin(t),sin(2t))$ has zero derivative when $t = lfrac14π$.






share|cite|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Of course, you can take the shortcut once you understand the derivation, namely $lfrac{dr}{dt} = lfrac{d(x^2)}{dx} lfrac{dx}{dt} + lfrac{d(y^2)}{dy} lfrac{dy}{dt} = 2x lfrac{dx}{dt} + 2y lfrac{dy}{dt}$ and continue from there.
    – user21820
    Nov 13 at 17:22










  • but you used the fact that the curve is differentiable in your soultion i think that it is neseccary that the curve is differntiable in order to solve the question
    – Razi Awad
    Nov 13 at 17:26












  • @RaziAwad: Isn't that exactly what I said? I said "the question actually must have that extra condition.", whereas you did not say that, neither in your question nor in your answer! Also, the curve only needs to be differentiable at that single point, as shown by my proof.
    – user21820
    Nov 13 at 17:27












  • absolutely i totaly agree that in a formal solution i should have said that the curve is diffrentiable in that point . but that doesn't mean my answer is incorrect it is partially correct .
    – Razi Awad
    Nov 13 at 17:32








  • 1




    @RaziAwad: If you differentiate with respect to $t$, you would be doing no different from what I did in my post, so yes. The key point to remember is that the derivative of a general curve is always with respect to the free parameter, and not to any coordinate. Also, it is almost always easier to minimize the squared distance than the actual distance.
    – user21820
    Nov 14 at 8:04











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2996572%2fprove-that-the-tangent-line-orthogonal-to-a-line%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote



accepted










Your attempted solution is incorrect. Firstly, the closest-point condition is not sufficient to imply that the curve is differentiable there. So the question actually must have that extra condition. Secondly, you wrongly assumed that the curve is a graph of $(x,y)$ where $y$ is some function of $x$. That was not given.
$
deflfrac#1#2{{largefrac{#1}{#2}}}
$





Let me use variables $x,y$ instead of $x_0,y_0$, varying with parameter $t$. We can also assume that $x_1 = y_1 = 0$.



Let $r = x^2+y^2$. Consider any point on the curve (specified by parameter $t$ and coordinates $x,y$). As $Δt to 0$ we have $lfrac{Δr}{Δt} = lfrac{((x+Δx)^2+(y+Δy)^2) - (x^2+y^2)}{Δt}$ $= 2(xlfrac{Δx}{Δt}+ylfrac{Δy}{Δt}) + (Δxlfrac{Δx}{Δt}+Δylfrac{Δy}{Δt})$. If the curve is differentiable there, then we also have $Δx,Δy approx 0$ and $lfrac{Δx}{Δt} approx lfrac{dx}{dt}$ and $lfrac{Δy}{Δt} approx lfrac{dy}{dt}$, and so $lfrac{Δr}{Δt} approx 2(xlfrac{dx}{dt}+ylfrac{dy}{dt})$, and hence $lfrac{dr}{dt} = 2(xlfrac{dx}{dt}+ylfrac{dy}{dt})$. If moreover $r$ is minimum there, then $lfrac{dr}{dt} = 0$, and so $xlfrac{dx}{dt}+ylfrac{dy}{dt} = 0$, equivalently $(x,y)·(lfrac{dx}{dt},lfrac{dy}{dt}) = 0$, and hence $(x,y)$ and $(lfrac{dx}{dt},lfrac{dy}{dt})$ are orthogonal.



Note that $(x,y)$ and $(lfrac{dx}{dt},lfrac{dy}{dt})$ are orthogonal if and only if they are perpendicular or one of them is zero. So there is actually no need for the question to state that $(x_1,y_1)$ is not on the curve. If you really want to get perpendicularity, even that condition is insufficient; you also have to add an extra condition that the curve's derivative at that point is nonzero. Otherwise it is possible that $(lfrac{dx}{dt},lfrac{dy}{dt})$ is zero (the point tracing the curve stops momentarily) but there is no (geometric) tangent there; for example $(cos(t)+sin(t),sin(2t))$ has zero derivative when $t = lfrac14π$.






share|cite|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Of course, you can take the shortcut once you understand the derivation, namely $lfrac{dr}{dt} = lfrac{d(x^2)}{dx} lfrac{dx}{dt} + lfrac{d(y^2)}{dy} lfrac{dy}{dt} = 2x lfrac{dx}{dt} + 2y lfrac{dy}{dt}$ and continue from there.
    – user21820
    Nov 13 at 17:22










  • but you used the fact that the curve is differentiable in your soultion i think that it is neseccary that the curve is differntiable in order to solve the question
    – Razi Awad
    Nov 13 at 17:26












  • @RaziAwad: Isn't that exactly what I said? I said "the question actually must have that extra condition.", whereas you did not say that, neither in your question nor in your answer! Also, the curve only needs to be differentiable at that single point, as shown by my proof.
    – user21820
    Nov 13 at 17:27












  • absolutely i totaly agree that in a formal solution i should have said that the curve is diffrentiable in that point . but that doesn't mean my answer is incorrect it is partially correct .
    – Razi Awad
    Nov 13 at 17:32








  • 1




    @RaziAwad: If you differentiate with respect to $t$, you would be doing no different from what I did in my post, so yes. The key point to remember is that the derivative of a general curve is always with respect to the free parameter, and not to any coordinate. Also, it is almost always easier to minimize the squared distance than the actual distance.
    – user21820
    Nov 14 at 8:04















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










Your attempted solution is incorrect. Firstly, the closest-point condition is not sufficient to imply that the curve is differentiable there. So the question actually must have that extra condition. Secondly, you wrongly assumed that the curve is a graph of $(x,y)$ where $y$ is some function of $x$. That was not given.
$
deflfrac#1#2{{largefrac{#1}{#2}}}
$





Let me use variables $x,y$ instead of $x_0,y_0$, varying with parameter $t$. We can also assume that $x_1 = y_1 = 0$.



Let $r = x^2+y^2$. Consider any point on the curve (specified by parameter $t$ and coordinates $x,y$). As $Δt to 0$ we have $lfrac{Δr}{Δt} = lfrac{((x+Δx)^2+(y+Δy)^2) - (x^2+y^2)}{Δt}$ $= 2(xlfrac{Δx}{Δt}+ylfrac{Δy}{Δt}) + (Δxlfrac{Δx}{Δt}+Δylfrac{Δy}{Δt})$. If the curve is differentiable there, then we also have $Δx,Δy approx 0$ and $lfrac{Δx}{Δt} approx lfrac{dx}{dt}$ and $lfrac{Δy}{Δt} approx lfrac{dy}{dt}$, and so $lfrac{Δr}{Δt} approx 2(xlfrac{dx}{dt}+ylfrac{dy}{dt})$, and hence $lfrac{dr}{dt} = 2(xlfrac{dx}{dt}+ylfrac{dy}{dt})$. If moreover $r$ is minimum there, then $lfrac{dr}{dt} = 0$, and so $xlfrac{dx}{dt}+ylfrac{dy}{dt} = 0$, equivalently $(x,y)·(lfrac{dx}{dt},lfrac{dy}{dt}) = 0$, and hence $(x,y)$ and $(lfrac{dx}{dt},lfrac{dy}{dt})$ are orthogonal.



Note that $(x,y)$ and $(lfrac{dx}{dt},lfrac{dy}{dt})$ are orthogonal if and only if they are perpendicular or one of them is zero. So there is actually no need for the question to state that $(x_1,y_1)$ is not on the curve. If you really want to get perpendicularity, even that condition is insufficient; you also have to add an extra condition that the curve's derivative at that point is nonzero. Otherwise it is possible that $(lfrac{dx}{dt},lfrac{dy}{dt})$ is zero (the point tracing the curve stops momentarily) but there is no (geometric) tangent there; for example $(cos(t)+sin(t),sin(2t))$ has zero derivative when $t = lfrac14π$.






share|cite|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Of course, you can take the shortcut once you understand the derivation, namely $lfrac{dr}{dt} = lfrac{d(x^2)}{dx} lfrac{dx}{dt} + lfrac{d(y^2)}{dy} lfrac{dy}{dt} = 2x lfrac{dx}{dt} + 2y lfrac{dy}{dt}$ and continue from there.
    – user21820
    Nov 13 at 17:22










  • but you used the fact that the curve is differentiable in your soultion i think that it is neseccary that the curve is differntiable in order to solve the question
    – Razi Awad
    Nov 13 at 17:26












  • @RaziAwad: Isn't that exactly what I said? I said "the question actually must have that extra condition.", whereas you did not say that, neither in your question nor in your answer! Also, the curve only needs to be differentiable at that single point, as shown by my proof.
    – user21820
    Nov 13 at 17:27












  • absolutely i totaly agree that in a formal solution i should have said that the curve is diffrentiable in that point . but that doesn't mean my answer is incorrect it is partially correct .
    – Razi Awad
    Nov 13 at 17:32








  • 1




    @RaziAwad: If you differentiate with respect to $t$, you would be doing no different from what I did in my post, so yes. The key point to remember is that the derivative of a general curve is always with respect to the free parameter, and not to any coordinate. Also, it is almost always easier to minimize the squared distance than the actual distance.
    – user21820
    Nov 14 at 8:04













up vote
1
down vote



accepted







up vote
1
down vote



accepted






Your attempted solution is incorrect. Firstly, the closest-point condition is not sufficient to imply that the curve is differentiable there. So the question actually must have that extra condition. Secondly, you wrongly assumed that the curve is a graph of $(x,y)$ where $y$ is some function of $x$. That was not given.
$
deflfrac#1#2{{largefrac{#1}{#2}}}
$





Let me use variables $x,y$ instead of $x_0,y_0$, varying with parameter $t$. We can also assume that $x_1 = y_1 = 0$.



Let $r = x^2+y^2$. Consider any point on the curve (specified by parameter $t$ and coordinates $x,y$). As $Δt to 0$ we have $lfrac{Δr}{Δt} = lfrac{((x+Δx)^2+(y+Δy)^2) - (x^2+y^2)}{Δt}$ $= 2(xlfrac{Δx}{Δt}+ylfrac{Δy}{Δt}) + (Δxlfrac{Δx}{Δt}+Δylfrac{Δy}{Δt})$. If the curve is differentiable there, then we also have $Δx,Δy approx 0$ and $lfrac{Δx}{Δt} approx lfrac{dx}{dt}$ and $lfrac{Δy}{Δt} approx lfrac{dy}{dt}$, and so $lfrac{Δr}{Δt} approx 2(xlfrac{dx}{dt}+ylfrac{dy}{dt})$, and hence $lfrac{dr}{dt} = 2(xlfrac{dx}{dt}+ylfrac{dy}{dt})$. If moreover $r$ is minimum there, then $lfrac{dr}{dt} = 0$, and so $xlfrac{dx}{dt}+ylfrac{dy}{dt} = 0$, equivalently $(x,y)·(lfrac{dx}{dt},lfrac{dy}{dt}) = 0$, and hence $(x,y)$ and $(lfrac{dx}{dt},lfrac{dy}{dt})$ are orthogonal.



Note that $(x,y)$ and $(lfrac{dx}{dt},lfrac{dy}{dt})$ are orthogonal if and only if they are perpendicular or one of them is zero. So there is actually no need for the question to state that $(x_1,y_1)$ is not on the curve. If you really want to get perpendicularity, even that condition is insufficient; you also have to add an extra condition that the curve's derivative at that point is nonzero. Otherwise it is possible that $(lfrac{dx}{dt},lfrac{dy}{dt})$ is zero (the point tracing the curve stops momentarily) but there is no (geometric) tangent there; for example $(cos(t)+sin(t),sin(2t))$ has zero derivative when $t = lfrac14π$.






share|cite|improve this answer












Your attempted solution is incorrect. Firstly, the closest-point condition is not sufficient to imply that the curve is differentiable there. So the question actually must have that extra condition. Secondly, you wrongly assumed that the curve is a graph of $(x,y)$ where $y$ is some function of $x$. That was not given.
$
deflfrac#1#2{{largefrac{#1}{#2}}}
$





Let me use variables $x,y$ instead of $x_0,y_0$, varying with parameter $t$. We can also assume that $x_1 = y_1 = 0$.



Let $r = x^2+y^2$. Consider any point on the curve (specified by parameter $t$ and coordinates $x,y$). As $Δt to 0$ we have $lfrac{Δr}{Δt} = lfrac{((x+Δx)^2+(y+Δy)^2) - (x^2+y^2)}{Δt}$ $= 2(xlfrac{Δx}{Δt}+ylfrac{Δy}{Δt}) + (Δxlfrac{Δx}{Δt}+Δylfrac{Δy}{Δt})$. If the curve is differentiable there, then we also have $Δx,Δy approx 0$ and $lfrac{Δx}{Δt} approx lfrac{dx}{dt}$ and $lfrac{Δy}{Δt} approx lfrac{dy}{dt}$, and so $lfrac{Δr}{Δt} approx 2(xlfrac{dx}{dt}+ylfrac{dy}{dt})$, and hence $lfrac{dr}{dt} = 2(xlfrac{dx}{dt}+ylfrac{dy}{dt})$. If moreover $r$ is minimum there, then $lfrac{dr}{dt} = 0$, and so $xlfrac{dx}{dt}+ylfrac{dy}{dt} = 0$, equivalently $(x,y)·(lfrac{dx}{dt},lfrac{dy}{dt}) = 0$, and hence $(x,y)$ and $(lfrac{dx}{dt},lfrac{dy}{dt})$ are orthogonal.



Note that $(x,y)$ and $(lfrac{dx}{dt},lfrac{dy}{dt})$ are orthogonal if and only if they are perpendicular or one of them is zero. So there is actually no need for the question to state that $(x_1,y_1)$ is not on the curve. If you really want to get perpendicularity, even that condition is insufficient; you also have to add an extra condition that the curve's derivative at that point is nonzero. Otherwise it is possible that $(lfrac{dx}{dt},lfrac{dy}{dt})$ is zero (the point tracing the curve stops momentarily) but there is no (geometric) tangent there; for example $(cos(t)+sin(t),sin(2t))$ has zero derivative when $t = lfrac14π$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Nov 13 at 17:14









user21820

37.9k441148




37.9k441148








  • 1




    Of course, you can take the shortcut once you understand the derivation, namely $lfrac{dr}{dt} = lfrac{d(x^2)}{dx} lfrac{dx}{dt} + lfrac{d(y^2)}{dy} lfrac{dy}{dt} = 2x lfrac{dx}{dt} + 2y lfrac{dy}{dt}$ and continue from there.
    – user21820
    Nov 13 at 17:22










  • but you used the fact that the curve is differentiable in your soultion i think that it is neseccary that the curve is differntiable in order to solve the question
    – Razi Awad
    Nov 13 at 17:26












  • @RaziAwad: Isn't that exactly what I said? I said "the question actually must have that extra condition.", whereas you did not say that, neither in your question nor in your answer! Also, the curve only needs to be differentiable at that single point, as shown by my proof.
    – user21820
    Nov 13 at 17:27












  • absolutely i totaly agree that in a formal solution i should have said that the curve is diffrentiable in that point . but that doesn't mean my answer is incorrect it is partially correct .
    – Razi Awad
    Nov 13 at 17:32








  • 1




    @RaziAwad: If you differentiate with respect to $t$, you would be doing no different from what I did in my post, so yes. The key point to remember is that the derivative of a general curve is always with respect to the free parameter, and not to any coordinate. Also, it is almost always easier to minimize the squared distance than the actual distance.
    – user21820
    Nov 14 at 8:04














  • 1




    Of course, you can take the shortcut once you understand the derivation, namely $lfrac{dr}{dt} = lfrac{d(x^2)}{dx} lfrac{dx}{dt} + lfrac{d(y^2)}{dy} lfrac{dy}{dt} = 2x lfrac{dx}{dt} + 2y lfrac{dy}{dt}$ and continue from there.
    – user21820
    Nov 13 at 17:22










  • but you used the fact that the curve is differentiable in your soultion i think that it is neseccary that the curve is differntiable in order to solve the question
    – Razi Awad
    Nov 13 at 17:26












  • @RaziAwad: Isn't that exactly what I said? I said "the question actually must have that extra condition.", whereas you did not say that, neither in your question nor in your answer! Also, the curve only needs to be differentiable at that single point, as shown by my proof.
    – user21820
    Nov 13 at 17:27












  • absolutely i totaly agree that in a formal solution i should have said that the curve is diffrentiable in that point . but that doesn't mean my answer is incorrect it is partially correct .
    – Razi Awad
    Nov 13 at 17:32








  • 1




    @RaziAwad: If you differentiate with respect to $t$, you would be doing no different from what I did in my post, so yes. The key point to remember is that the derivative of a general curve is always with respect to the free parameter, and not to any coordinate. Also, it is almost always easier to minimize the squared distance than the actual distance.
    – user21820
    Nov 14 at 8:04








1




1




Of course, you can take the shortcut once you understand the derivation, namely $lfrac{dr}{dt} = lfrac{d(x^2)}{dx} lfrac{dx}{dt} + lfrac{d(y^2)}{dy} lfrac{dy}{dt} = 2x lfrac{dx}{dt} + 2y lfrac{dy}{dt}$ and continue from there.
– user21820
Nov 13 at 17:22




Of course, you can take the shortcut once you understand the derivation, namely $lfrac{dr}{dt} = lfrac{d(x^2)}{dx} lfrac{dx}{dt} + lfrac{d(y^2)}{dy} lfrac{dy}{dt} = 2x lfrac{dx}{dt} + 2y lfrac{dy}{dt}$ and continue from there.
– user21820
Nov 13 at 17:22












but you used the fact that the curve is differentiable in your soultion i think that it is neseccary that the curve is differntiable in order to solve the question
– Razi Awad
Nov 13 at 17:26






but you used the fact that the curve is differentiable in your soultion i think that it is neseccary that the curve is differntiable in order to solve the question
– Razi Awad
Nov 13 at 17:26














@RaziAwad: Isn't that exactly what I said? I said "the question actually must have that extra condition.", whereas you did not say that, neither in your question nor in your answer! Also, the curve only needs to be differentiable at that single point, as shown by my proof.
– user21820
Nov 13 at 17:27






@RaziAwad: Isn't that exactly what I said? I said "the question actually must have that extra condition.", whereas you did not say that, neither in your question nor in your answer! Also, the curve only needs to be differentiable at that single point, as shown by my proof.
– user21820
Nov 13 at 17:27














absolutely i totaly agree that in a formal solution i should have said that the curve is diffrentiable in that point . but that doesn't mean my answer is incorrect it is partially correct .
– Razi Awad
Nov 13 at 17:32






absolutely i totaly agree that in a formal solution i should have said that the curve is diffrentiable in that point . but that doesn't mean my answer is incorrect it is partially correct .
– Razi Awad
Nov 13 at 17:32






1




1




@RaziAwad: If you differentiate with respect to $t$, you would be doing no different from what I did in my post, so yes. The key point to remember is that the derivative of a general curve is always with respect to the free parameter, and not to any coordinate. Also, it is almost always easier to minimize the squared distance than the actual distance.
– user21820
Nov 14 at 8:04




@RaziAwad: If you differentiate with respect to $t$, you would be doing no different from what I did in my post, so yes. The key point to remember is that the derivative of a general curve is always with respect to the free parameter, and not to any coordinate. Also, it is almost always easier to minimize the squared distance than the actual distance.
– user21820
Nov 14 at 8:04


















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2996572%2fprove-that-the-tangent-line-orthogonal-to-a-line%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

Aardman Animations

Are they similar matrix