How to transform this Diffusion equation ?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I have a diffusion equation:



$$ nabla^2C = frac{partial C}{partial t}$$.



Now I would like to transform this equation into a co-ordiante frame which movies with the unperturbed palaner interface($z=0$ ) with steady state veloity $v_o$, i.e. $z = z -v_0t$.



Can anyone explain how to go about it ?










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    I have a diffusion equation:



    $$ nabla^2C = frac{partial C}{partial t}$$.



    Now I would like to transform this equation into a co-ordiante frame which movies with the unperturbed palaner interface($z=0$ ) with steady state veloity $v_o$, i.e. $z = z -v_0t$.



    Can anyone explain how to go about it ?










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      I have a diffusion equation:



      $$ nabla^2C = frac{partial C}{partial t}$$.



      Now I would like to transform this equation into a co-ordiante frame which movies with the unperturbed palaner interface($z=0$ ) with steady state veloity $v_o$, i.e. $z = z -v_0t$.



      Can anyone explain how to go about it ?










      share|cite|improve this question















      I have a diffusion equation:



      $$ nabla^2C = frac{partial C}{partial t}$$.



      Now I would like to transform this equation into a co-ordiante frame which movies with the unperturbed palaner interface($z=0$ ) with steady state veloity $v_o$, i.e. $z = z -v_0t$.



      Can anyone explain how to go about it ?







      differential-equations pde transformation substitution






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 13 at 10:24

























      asked Nov 13 at 10:12









      newstudent

      154




      154






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          The current variables are the position $mathbf{x}$ and the time $t$, that will be transformed to $mathbf{x}'=mathbf{x}-mathbf{v}_0 t$ and $t'=t$. According to the chain rule,
          $$
          frac{partial}{partial t} = frac{partial t'}{partial t} frac{partial}{partial t'} + frac{partial x'}{partial t} frac{partial}{partial x'} + frac{partial y'}{partial t} frac{partial}{partial y'}+ frac{partial z'}{partial t} frac{partial}{partial z'} = frac{partial}{partial t'} + mathbf{v}_0 cdot nabla
          $$



          Therefore, the equation is now
          $$
          nabla^2 C = frac{partial C}{partial t} + mathbf{v}_0 cdot nabla C,
          $$

          i.e., in the moving frame the diffusion equation takes the form of an advection-diffusion equation. Naturally, using $mathbf{v}_0=0$ in the equation leads back to the original diffusion equation.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2996562%2fhow-to-transform-this-diffusion-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            0
            down vote



            accepted










            The current variables are the position $mathbf{x}$ and the time $t$, that will be transformed to $mathbf{x}'=mathbf{x}-mathbf{v}_0 t$ and $t'=t$. According to the chain rule,
            $$
            frac{partial}{partial t} = frac{partial t'}{partial t} frac{partial}{partial t'} + frac{partial x'}{partial t} frac{partial}{partial x'} + frac{partial y'}{partial t} frac{partial}{partial y'}+ frac{partial z'}{partial t} frac{partial}{partial z'} = frac{partial}{partial t'} + mathbf{v}_0 cdot nabla
            $$



            Therefore, the equation is now
            $$
            nabla^2 C = frac{partial C}{partial t} + mathbf{v}_0 cdot nabla C,
            $$

            i.e., in the moving frame the diffusion equation takes the form of an advection-diffusion equation. Naturally, using $mathbf{v}_0=0$ in the equation leads back to the original diffusion equation.






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              0
              down vote



              accepted










              The current variables are the position $mathbf{x}$ and the time $t$, that will be transformed to $mathbf{x}'=mathbf{x}-mathbf{v}_0 t$ and $t'=t$. According to the chain rule,
              $$
              frac{partial}{partial t} = frac{partial t'}{partial t} frac{partial}{partial t'} + frac{partial x'}{partial t} frac{partial}{partial x'} + frac{partial y'}{partial t} frac{partial}{partial y'}+ frac{partial z'}{partial t} frac{partial}{partial z'} = frac{partial}{partial t'} + mathbf{v}_0 cdot nabla
              $$



              Therefore, the equation is now
              $$
              nabla^2 C = frac{partial C}{partial t} + mathbf{v}_0 cdot nabla C,
              $$

              i.e., in the moving frame the diffusion equation takes the form of an advection-diffusion equation. Naturally, using $mathbf{v}_0=0$ in the equation leads back to the original diffusion equation.






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                0
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                0
                down vote



                accepted






                The current variables are the position $mathbf{x}$ and the time $t$, that will be transformed to $mathbf{x}'=mathbf{x}-mathbf{v}_0 t$ and $t'=t$. According to the chain rule,
                $$
                frac{partial}{partial t} = frac{partial t'}{partial t} frac{partial}{partial t'} + frac{partial x'}{partial t} frac{partial}{partial x'} + frac{partial y'}{partial t} frac{partial}{partial y'}+ frac{partial z'}{partial t} frac{partial}{partial z'} = frac{partial}{partial t'} + mathbf{v}_0 cdot nabla
                $$



                Therefore, the equation is now
                $$
                nabla^2 C = frac{partial C}{partial t} + mathbf{v}_0 cdot nabla C,
                $$

                i.e., in the moving frame the diffusion equation takes the form of an advection-diffusion equation. Naturally, using $mathbf{v}_0=0$ in the equation leads back to the original diffusion equation.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                The current variables are the position $mathbf{x}$ and the time $t$, that will be transformed to $mathbf{x}'=mathbf{x}-mathbf{v}_0 t$ and $t'=t$. According to the chain rule,
                $$
                frac{partial}{partial t} = frac{partial t'}{partial t} frac{partial}{partial t'} + frac{partial x'}{partial t} frac{partial}{partial x'} + frac{partial y'}{partial t} frac{partial}{partial y'}+ frac{partial z'}{partial t} frac{partial}{partial z'} = frac{partial}{partial t'} + mathbf{v}_0 cdot nabla
                $$



                Therefore, the equation is now
                $$
                nabla^2 C = frac{partial C}{partial t} + mathbf{v}_0 cdot nabla C,
                $$

                i.e., in the moving frame the diffusion equation takes the form of an advection-diffusion equation. Naturally, using $mathbf{v}_0=0$ in the equation leads back to the original diffusion equation.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 13 at 12:59









                rafa11111

                748315




                748315






























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded



















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2996562%2fhow-to-transform-this-diffusion-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How do I know what Microsoft account the skydrive app is syncing to?

                    When does type information flow backwards in C++?

                    Grease: Live!