Conditional Expectation $E[X_n|mathcal{G}]$. [on hold]











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












If $x_n leq y in L^1$ and $x_n$ a.s to $x$, then show that $E[X_n|mathcal{G}]$ a.s to $E[X|mathcal{G}]$. We may need to apply Dominated Convergent Theorem.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Emilia78 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as off-topic by user10354138, saz, Davide Giraudo, Cesareo, Alexander Gruber Nov 15 at 4:54


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – user10354138, saz, Davide Giraudo, Cesareo, Alexander Gruber

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 2




    Welcome to MSE. It will be more likely that you will get an answer if you show us that you made an effort. This should be added to the question rather than in the comments.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Nov 13 at 10:08










  • Consider formatting your question clearly by putting the math parts enclosed in $ .
    – Gautam Shenoy
    Nov 13 at 10:09










  • It would be easy if it was true that whenever $E[1_BY_n] rightarrow 0 $ for every set $B in mathcal{G}$, than $Y_n rightarrow 0$ a.s. . , but I do not know if this is true... Is somebody can point a reference of such a result I can write the simple reasonings...
    – Thomas
    Nov 13 at 17:46

















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












If $x_n leq y in L^1$ and $x_n$ a.s to $x$, then show that $E[X_n|mathcal{G}]$ a.s to $E[X|mathcal{G}]$. We may need to apply Dominated Convergent Theorem.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Emilia78 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as off-topic by user10354138, saz, Davide Giraudo, Cesareo, Alexander Gruber Nov 15 at 4:54


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – user10354138, saz, Davide Giraudo, Cesareo, Alexander Gruber

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 2




    Welcome to MSE. It will be more likely that you will get an answer if you show us that you made an effort. This should be added to the question rather than in the comments.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Nov 13 at 10:08










  • Consider formatting your question clearly by putting the math parts enclosed in $ .
    – Gautam Shenoy
    Nov 13 at 10:09










  • It would be easy if it was true that whenever $E[1_BY_n] rightarrow 0 $ for every set $B in mathcal{G}$, than $Y_n rightarrow 0$ a.s. . , but I do not know if this is true... Is somebody can point a reference of such a result I can write the simple reasonings...
    – Thomas
    Nov 13 at 17:46















up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











If $x_n leq y in L^1$ and $x_n$ a.s to $x$, then show that $E[X_n|mathcal{G}]$ a.s to $E[X|mathcal{G}]$. We may need to apply Dominated Convergent Theorem.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Emilia78 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











If $x_n leq y in L^1$ and $x_n$ a.s to $x$, then show that $E[X_n|mathcal{G}]$ a.s to $E[X|mathcal{G}]$. We may need to apply Dominated Convergent Theorem.







probability-theory conditional-expectation






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Emilia78 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Emilia78 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 13 at 10:07









MathOverview

8,55443063




8,55443063






New contributor




Emilia78 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Nov 13 at 10:03









Emilia78

11




11




New contributor




Emilia78 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Emilia78 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Emilia78 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




put on hold as off-topic by user10354138, saz, Davide Giraudo, Cesareo, Alexander Gruber Nov 15 at 4:54


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – user10354138, saz, Davide Giraudo, Cesareo, Alexander Gruber

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




put on hold as off-topic by user10354138, saz, Davide Giraudo, Cesareo, Alexander Gruber Nov 15 at 4:54


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – user10354138, saz, Davide Giraudo, Cesareo, Alexander Gruber

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 2




    Welcome to MSE. It will be more likely that you will get an answer if you show us that you made an effort. This should be added to the question rather than in the comments.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Nov 13 at 10:08










  • Consider formatting your question clearly by putting the math parts enclosed in $ .
    – Gautam Shenoy
    Nov 13 at 10:09










  • It would be easy if it was true that whenever $E[1_BY_n] rightarrow 0 $ for every set $B in mathcal{G}$, than $Y_n rightarrow 0$ a.s. . , but I do not know if this is true... Is somebody can point a reference of such a result I can write the simple reasonings...
    – Thomas
    Nov 13 at 17:46
















  • 2




    Welcome to MSE. It will be more likely that you will get an answer if you show us that you made an effort. This should be added to the question rather than in the comments.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Nov 13 at 10:08










  • Consider formatting your question clearly by putting the math parts enclosed in $ .
    – Gautam Shenoy
    Nov 13 at 10:09










  • It would be easy if it was true that whenever $E[1_BY_n] rightarrow 0 $ for every set $B in mathcal{G}$, than $Y_n rightarrow 0$ a.s. . , but I do not know if this is true... Is somebody can point a reference of such a result I can write the simple reasonings...
    – Thomas
    Nov 13 at 17:46










2




2




Welcome to MSE. It will be more likely that you will get an answer if you show us that you made an effort. This should be added to the question rather than in the comments.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 13 at 10:08




Welcome to MSE. It will be more likely that you will get an answer if you show us that you made an effort. This should be added to the question rather than in the comments.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 13 at 10:08












Consider formatting your question clearly by putting the math parts enclosed in $ .
– Gautam Shenoy
Nov 13 at 10:09




Consider formatting your question clearly by putting the math parts enclosed in $ .
– Gautam Shenoy
Nov 13 at 10:09












It would be easy if it was true that whenever $E[1_BY_n] rightarrow 0 $ for every set $B in mathcal{G}$, than $Y_n rightarrow 0$ a.s. . , but I do not know if this is true... Is somebody can point a reference of such a result I can write the simple reasonings...
– Thomas
Nov 13 at 17:46






It would be easy if it was true that whenever $E[1_BY_n] rightarrow 0 $ for every set $B in mathcal{G}$, than $Y_n rightarrow 0$ a.s. . , but I do not know if this is true... Is somebody can point a reference of such a result I can write the simple reasonings...
– Thomas
Nov 13 at 17:46

















active

oldest

votes






















active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes

Popular posts from this blog

How do I know what Microsoft account the skydrive app is syncing to?

When does type information flow backwards in C++?

Grease: Live!