Books for Complex Differential Geometry: index approach












0












$begingroup$


What are some books (if any) that tackle complex differential geometry with tensors in index notation?



My studies have led me to an area where I think I must proceed with that field; however, I have only encountered (real) differential geometry with tensor index notation and as such would have to do significantly more reading if the canon extending the notions to complex manifolds does not have a similar approach. I have scanned through some books such as Huybrechts and Demailly: They seem comprehensible, but I have trouble seeing how their formulation may apply like real tensors to relativity: Alternatively what books can give me the background/prerequisites to understand the physics applications of the language used in those books?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If you want something full of gory detail index calculations, you might try an appendix of a supersymmetry introduction. There they need a lot of complex and Kahler geometry so you might see an introduction included for the typical theoretical physicist even if you don't need any supersymmetry. If I find a specific, will turn into an answer.
    $endgroup$
    – AHusain
    Jan 7 at 22:30










  • $begingroup$
    @AHusain supersymmetry in what context? I just tried looking for some intros and, at least superficially, the ones I saw did not refer to geometry at all.
    $endgroup$
    – Quantumness
    Jan 7 at 22:42










  • $begingroup$
    Search for both Kahler potential and supersymmetry. The idea is quantizing maps from the spacetime into some Kahler manifold.
    $endgroup$
    – AHusain
    Jan 8 at 4:06
















0












$begingroup$


What are some books (if any) that tackle complex differential geometry with tensors in index notation?



My studies have led me to an area where I think I must proceed with that field; however, I have only encountered (real) differential geometry with tensor index notation and as such would have to do significantly more reading if the canon extending the notions to complex manifolds does not have a similar approach. I have scanned through some books such as Huybrechts and Demailly: They seem comprehensible, but I have trouble seeing how their formulation may apply like real tensors to relativity: Alternatively what books can give me the background/prerequisites to understand the physics applications of the language used in those books?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If you want something full of gory detail index calculations, you might try an appendix of a supersymmetry introduction. There they need a lot of complex and Kahler geometry so you might see an introduction included for the typical theoretical physicist even if you don't need any supersymmetry. If I find a specific, will turn into an answer.
    $endgroup$
    – AHusain
    Jan 7 at 22:30










  • $begingroup$
    @AHusain supersymmetry in what context? I just tried looking for some intros and, at least superficially, the ones I saw did not refer to geometry at all.
    $endgroup$
    – Quantumness
    Jan 7 at 22:42










  • $begingroup$
    Search for both Kahler potential and supersymmetry. The idea is quantizing maps from the spacetime into some Kahler manifold.
    $endgroup$
    – AHusain
    Jan 8 at 4:06














0












0








0





$begingroup$


What are some books (if any) that tackle complex differential geometry with tensors in index notation?



My studies have led me to an area where I think I must proceed with that field; however, I have only encountered (real) differential geometry with tensor index notation and as such would have to do significantly more reading if the canon extending the notions to complex manifolds does not have a similar approach. I have scanned through some books such as Huybrechts and Demailly: They seem comprehensible, but I have trouble seeing how their formulation may apply like real tensors to relativity: Alternatively what books can give me the background/prerequisites to understand the physics applications of the language used in those books?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




What are some books (if any) that tackle complex differential geometry with tensors in index notation?



My studies have led me to an area where I think I must proceed with that field; however, I have only encountered (real) differential geometry with tensor index notation and as such would have to do significantly more reading if the canon extending the notions to complex manifolds does not have a similar approach. I have scanned through some books such as Huybrechts and Demailly: They seem comprehensible, but I have trouble seeing how their formulation may apply like real tensors to relativity: Alternatively what books can give me the background/prerequisites to understand the physics applications of the language used in those books?







differential-geometry reference-request complex-geometry






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 7 at 22:11









QuantumnessQuantumness

1243




1243








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If you want something full of gory detail index calculations, you might try an appendix of a supersymmetry introduction. There they need a lot of complex and Kahler geometry so you might see an introduction included for the typical theoretical physicist even if you don't need any supersymmetry. If I find a specific, will turn into an answer.
    $endgroup$
    – AHusain
    Jan 7 at 22:30










  • $begingroup$
    @AHusain supersymmetry in what context? I just tried looking for some intros and, at least superficially, the ones I saw did not refer to geometry at all.
    $endgroup$
    – Quantumness
    Jan 7 at 22:42










  • $begingroup$
    Search for both Kahler potential and supersymmetry. The idea is quantizing maps from the spacetime into some Kahler manifold.
    $endgroup$
    – AHusain
    Jan 8 at 4:06














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If you want something full of gory detail index calculations, you might try an appendix of a supersymmetry introduction. There they need a lot of complex and Kahler geometry so you might see an introduction included for the typical theoretical physicist even if you don't need any supersymmetry. If I find a specific, will turn into an answer.
    $endgroup$
    – AHusain
    Jan 7 at 22:30










  • $begingroup$
    @AHusain supersymmetry in what context? I just tried looking for some intros and, at least superficially, the ones I saw did not refer to geometry at all.
    $endgroup$
    – Quantumness
    Jan 7 at 22:42










  • $begingroup$
    Search for both Kahler potential and supersymmetry. The idea is quantizing maps from the spacetime into some Kahler manifold.
    $endgroup$
    – AHusain
    Jan 8 at 4:06








1




1




$begingroup$
If you want something full of gory detail index calculations, you might try an appendix of a supersymmetry introduction. There they need a lot of complex and Kahler geometry so you might see an introduction included for the typical theoretical physicist even if you don't need any supersymmetry. If I find a specific, will turn into an answer.
$endgroup$
– AHusain
Jan 7 at 22:30




$begingroup$
If you want something full of gory detail index calculations, you might try an appendix of a supersymmetry introduction. There they need a lot of complex and Kahler geometry so you might see an introduction included for the typical theoretical physicist even if you don't need any supersymmetry. If I find a specific, will turn into an answer.
$endgroup$
– AHusain
Jan 7 at 22:30












$begingroup$
@AHusain supersymmetry in what context? I just tried looking for some intros and, at least superficially, the ones I saw did not refer to geometry at all.
$endgroup$
– Quantumness
Jan 7 at 22:42




$begingroup$
@AHusain supersymmetry in what context? I just tried looking for some intros and, at least superficially, the ones I saw did not refer to geometry at all.
$endgroup$
– Quantumness
Jan 7 at 22:42












$begingroup$
Search for both Kahler potential and supersymmetry. The idea is quantizing maps from the spacetime into some Kahler manifold.
$endgroup$
– AHusain
Jan 8 at 4:06




$begingroup$
Search for both Kahler potential and supersymmetry. The idea is quantizing maps from the spacetime into some Kahler manifold.
$endgroup$
– AHusain
Jan 8 at 4:06










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

One option:



Some searching led me to this set of lecture notes. On cursory reading it seems alright in its explanations and particularly useful in combining index notation with the coordinate-free approach; however, I am not sure how to evaluate it as it appears unmotivated and does not seem to tackle coordinate transformations (which to my understanding is what defines tensors). Further, it seems unclear how the concepts may be used outside of it simply existing.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065564%2fbooks-for-complex-differential-geometry-index-approach%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    One option:



    Some searching led me to this set of lecture notes. On cursory reading it seems alright in its explanations and particularly useful in combining index notation with the coordinate-free approach; however, I am not sure how to evaluate it as it appears unmotivated and does not seem to tackle coordinate transformations (which to my understanding is what defines tensors). Further, it seems unclear how the concepts may be used outside of it simply existing.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      One option:



      Some searching led me to this set of lecture notes. On cursory reading it seems alright in its explanations and particularly useful in combining index notation with the coordinate-free approach; however, I am not sure how to evaluate it as it appears unmotivated and does not seem to tackle coordinate transformations (which to my understanding is what defines tensors). Further, it seems unclear how the concepts may be used outside of it simply existing.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        One option:



        Some searching led me to this set of lecture notes. On cursory reading it seems alright in its explanations and particularly useful in combining index notation with the coordinate-free approach; however, I am not sure how to evaluate it as it appears unmotivated and does not seem to tackle coordinate transformations (which to my understanding is what defines tensors). Further, it seems unclear how the concepts may be used outside of it simply existing.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        One option:



        Some searching led me to this set of lecture notes. On cursory reading it seems alright in its explanations and particularly useful in combining index notation with the coordinate-free approach; however, I am not sure how to evaluate it as it appears unmotivated and does not seem to tackle coordinate transformations (which to my understanding is what defines tensors). Further, it seems unclear how the concepts may be used outside of it simply existing.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 9 at 22:23









        QuantumnessQuantumness

        1243




        1243






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065564%2fbooks-for-complex-differential-geometry-index-approach%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

            Aardman Animations

            Are they similar matrix