How do we get supersonic bullets?












48












$begingroup$


I recently answered a question on the WorldBuilding forum about grenades and bullets. One of the things that came up was that I argued smokeless powder in a rifle round could detonate, but was challenged on that. Commenters said that smokeless powder only deflagrates during normal use.



This, however, leaves me with a question. How can we accelerate a bullet to supersonic speeds using only a sonic speed pressure wave? As the bullet approaches the speed of sound, shouldn't the pressure wave be pushing the bullet less effectively? It strikes me that a bullet traveling at the speed of sound should not be able to be pushed by a pressure wave at the speed of sound.



How does this work?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Black powder can send a bullet supersonic, too. My understanding is that it deflagrates.
    $endgroup$
    – Don Branson
    Feb 4 at 19:45






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Deflagration (Lat: de + flagrare, "to burn down") is subsonic combustion propagating through heat transfer; hot burning material heats the next layer of cold material and ignites it. Most "fires" found in daily life, from flames to explosions such as that of Black powder, are deflagrations. This differs from detonation, which propagates supersonically through shock waves, decomposing a substance extremely quickly. wikipedia.
    $endgroup$
    – Captain Giraffe
    Feb 5 at 2:10
















48












$begingroup$


I recently answered a question on the WorldBuilding forum about grenades and bullets. One of the things that came up was that I argued smokeless powder in a rifle round could detonate, but was challenged on that. Commenters said that smokeless powder only deflagrates during normal use.



This, however, leaves me with a question. How can we accelerate a bullet to supersonic speeds using only a sonic speed pressure wave? As the bullet approaches the speed of sound, shouldn't the pressure wave be pushing the bullet less effectively? It strikes me that a bullet traveling at the speed of sound should not be able to be pushed by a pressure wave at the speed of sound.



How does this work?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Black powder can send a bullet supersonic, too. My understanding is that it deflagrates.
    $endgroup$
    – Don Branson
    Feb 4 at 19:45






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Deflagration (Lat: de + flagrare, "to burn down") is subsonic combustion propagating through heat transfer; hot burning material heats the next layer of cold material and ignites it. Most "fires" found in daily life, from flames to explosions such as that of Black powder, are deflagrations. This differs from detonation, which propagates supersonically through shock waves, decomposing a substance extremely quickly. wikipedia.
    $endgroup$
    – Captain Giraffe
    Feb 5 at 2:10














48












48








48


2



$begingroup$


I recently answered a question on the WorldBuilding forum about grenades and bullets. One of the things that came up was that I argued smokeless powder in a rifle round could detonate, but was challenged on that. Commenters said that smokeless powder only deflagrates during normal use.



This, however, leaves me with a question. How can we accelerate a bullet to supersonic speeds using only a sonic speed pressure wave? As the bullet approaches the speed of sound, shouldn't the pressure wave be pushing the bullet less effectively? It strikes me that a bullet traveling at the speed of sound should not be able to be pushed by a pressure wave at the speed of sound.



How does this work?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I recently answered a question on the WorldBuilding forum about grenades and bullets. One of the things that came up was that I argued smokeless powder in a rifle round could detonate, but was challenged on that. Commenters said that smokeless powder only deflagrates during normal use.



This, however, leaves me with a question. How can we accelerate a bullet to supersonic speeds using only a sonic speed pressure wave? As the bullet approaches the speed of sound, shouldn't the pressure wave be pushing the bullet less effectively? It strikes me that a bullet traveling at the speed of sound should not be able to be pushed by a pressure wave at the speed of sound.



How does this work?







pressure acoustics projectile explosions shock-waves






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Feb 4 at 16:14









Qmechanic

105k121921207




105k121921207










asked Feb 4 at 14:50









Cort AmmonCort Ammon

23.3k34778




23.3k34778








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Black powder can send a bullet supersonic, too. My understanding is that it deflagrates.
    $endgroup$
    – Don Branson
    Feb 4 at 19:45






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Deflagration (Lat: de + flagrare, "to burn down") is subsonic combustion propagating through heat transfer; hot burning material heats the next layer of cold material and ignites it. Most "fires" found in daily life, from flames to explosions such as that of Black powder, are deflagrations. This differs from detonation, which propagates supersonically through shock waves, decomposing a substance extremely quickly. wikipedia.
    $endgroup$
    – Captain Giraffe
    Feb 5 at 2:10














  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Black powder can send a bullet supersonic, too. My understanding is that it deflagrates.
    $endgroup$
    – Don Branson
    Feb 4 at 19:45






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Deflagration (Lat: de + flagrare, "to burn down") is subsonic combustion propagating through heat transfer; hot burning material heats the next layer of cold material and ignites it. Most "fires" found in daily life, from flames to explosions such as that of Black powder, are deflagrations. This differs from detonation, which propagates supersonically through shock waves, decomposing a substance extremely quickly. wikipedia.
    $endgroup$
    – Captain Giraffe
    Feb 5 at 2:10








4




4




$begingroup$
Black powder can send a bullet supersonic, too. My understanding is that it deflagrates.
$endgroup$
– Don Branson
Feb 4 at 19:45




$begingroup$
Black powder can send a bullet supersonic, too. My understanding is that it deflagrates.
$endgroup$
– Don Branson
Feb 4 at 19:45




2




2




$begingroup$
Deflagration (Lat: de + flagrare, "to burn down") is subsonic combustion propagating through heat transfer; hot burning material heats the next layer of cold material and ignites it. Most "fires" found in daily life, from flames to explosions such as that of Black powder, are deflagrations. This differs from detonation, which propagates supersonically through shock waves, decomposing a substance extremely quickly. wikipedia.
$endgroup$
– Captain Giraffe
Feb 5 at 2:10




$begingroup$
Deflagration (Lat: de + flagrare, "to burn down") is subsonic combustion propagating through heat transfer; hot burning material heats the next layer of cold material and ignites it. Most "fires" found in daily life, from flames to explosions such as that of Black powder, are deflagrations. This differs from detonation, which propagates supersonically through shock waves, decomposing a substance extremely quickly. wikipedia.
$endgroup$
– Captain Giraffe
Feb 5 at 2:10










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















75












$begingroup$

The speed of sound increases with increasing pressure. Assuming ideal behaviour the relationship is:



$$ v = sqrt{gammafrac{P}{rho}} $$



or equivalently:



$$ v = sqrt{frac{gamma RT}{M}} $$



where $M$ is the molar mass.



In a gun barrel just after the charge has gone off the gas is under very high pressure and very hot, so the speed of sound is much higher than under ambient conditions.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Re, "very high pressure", see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chamber_pressure
    $endgroup$
    – Solomon Slow
    Feb 4 at 17:41






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    And SAAMI recommended chamber pressures.
    $endgroup$
    – TKK
    Feb 5 at 15:16



















38












$begingroup$

Deflagration means that the combustion moves through the fuel slower than the speed of sound in the fuel. It doesn't say anything about the speed of the resulting gas, or how it compares to the speed of sound in that gas (and the speed of sound in solids is generally higher than that of gasses). The gas that is released from the combustion isn't at equilibrium, so properties such as "pressure", "temperature", and thus "speed of sound" aren't fully defined for it.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This does limit the combustion process though. If the medium is moving faster than the flame front, unburned fuel downstream of the flame front isn't ever burned. This is a huge oversimplification. There is a lot of nuance to this speed relative to what etc, but the upshot is that unconfined there is a limit on the speed of the resulting gas dependent on among other factors the speed of combustion.
    $endgroup$
    – drjpizzle
    Feb 6 at 14:47











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f458828%2fhow-do-we-get-supersonic-bullets%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









75












$begingroup$

The speed of sound increases with increasing pressure. Assuming ideal behaviour the relationship is:



$$ v = sqrt{gammafrac{P}{rho}} $$



or equivalently:



$$ v = sqrt{frac{gamma RT}{M}} $$



where $M$ is the molar mass.



In a gun barrel just after the charge has gone off the gas is under very high pressure and very hot, so the speed of sound is much higher than under ambient conditions.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Re, "very high pressure", see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chamber_pressure
    $endgroup$
    – Solomon Slow
    Feb 4 at 17:41






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    And SAAMI recommended chamber pressures.
    $endgroup$
    – TKK
    Feb 5 at 15:16
















75












$begingroup$

The speed of sound increases with increasing pressure. Assuming ideal behaviour the relationship is:



$$ v = sqrt{gammafrac{P}{rho}} $$



or equivalently:



$$ v = sqrt{frac{gamma RT}{M}} $$



where $M$ is the molar mass.



In a gun barrel just after the charge has gone off the gas is under very high pressure and very hot, so the speed of sound is much higher than under ambient conditions.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Re, "very high pressure", see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chamber_pressure
    $endgroup$
    – Solomon Slow
    Feb 4 at 17:41






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    And SAAMI recommended chamber pressures.
    $endgroup$
    – TKK
    Feb 5 at 15:16














75












75








75





$begingroup$

The speed of sound increases with increasing pressure. Assuming ideal behaviour the relationship is:



$$ v = sqrt{gammafrac{P}{rho}} $$



or equivalently:



$$ v = sqrt{frac{gamma RT}{M}} $$



where $M$ is the molar mass.



In a gun barrel just after the charge has gone off the gas is under very high pressure and very hot, so the speed of sound is much higher than under ambient conditions.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



The speed of sound increases with increasing pressure. Assuming ideal behaviour the relationship is:



$$ v = sqrt{gammafrac{P}{rho}} $$



or equivalently:



$$ v = sqrt{frac{gamma RT}{M}} $$



where $M$ is the molar mass.



In a gun barrel just after the charge has gone off the gas is under very high pressure and very hot, so the speed of sound is much higher than under ambient conditions.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Feb 4 at 15:55









John RennieJohn Rennie

276k44549792




276k44549792








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Re, "very high pressure", see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chamber_pressure
    $endgroup$
    – Solomon Slow
    Feb 4 at 17:41






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    And SAAMI recommended chamber pressures.
    $endgroup$
    – TKK
    Feb 5 at 15:16














  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Re, "very high pressure", see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chamber_pressure
    $endgroup$
    – Solomon Slow
    Feb 4 at 17:41






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    And SAAMI recommended chamber pressures.
    $endgroup$
    – TKK
    Feb 5 at 15:16








3




3




$begingroup$
Re, "very high pressure", see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chamber_pressure
$endgroup$
– Solomon Slow
Feb 4 at 17:41




$begingroup$
Re, "very high pressure", see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chamber_pressure
$endgroup$
– Solomon Slow
Feb 4 at 17:41




2




2




$begingroup$
And SAAMI recommended chamber pressures.
$endgroup$
– TKK
Feb 5 at 15:16




$begingroup$
And SAAMI recommended chamber pressures.
$endgroup$
– TKK
Feb 5 at 15:16











38












$begingroup$

Deflagration means that the combustion moves through the fuel slower than the speed of sound in the fuel. It doesn't say anything about the speed of the resulting gas, or how it compares to the speed of sound in that gas (and the speed of sound in solids is generally higher than that of gasses). The gas that is released from the combustion isn't at equilibrium, so properties such as "pressure", "temperature", and thus "speed of sound" aren't fully defined for it.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This does limit the combustion process though. If the medium is moving faster than the flame front, unburned fuel downstream of the flame front isn't ever burned. This is a huge oversimplification. There is a lot of nuance to this speed relative to what etc, but the upshot is that unconfined there is a limit on the speed of the resulting gas dependent on among other factors the speed of combustion.
    $endgroup$
    – drjpizzle
    Feb 6 at 14:47
















38












$begingroup$

Deflagration means that the combustion moves through the fuel slower than the speed of sound in the fuel. It doesn't say anything about the speed of the resulting gas, or how it compares to the speed of sound in that gas (and the speed of sound in solids is generally higher than that of gasses). The gas that is released from the combustion isn't at equilibrium, so properties such as "pressure", "temperature", and thus "speed of sound" aren't fully defined for it.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This does limit the combustion process though. If the medium is moving faster than the flame front, unburned fuel downstream of the flame front isn't ever burned. This is a huge oversimplification. There is a lot of nuance to this speed relative to what etc, but the upshot is that unconfined there is a limit on the speed of the resulting gas dependent on among other factors the speed of combustion.
    $endgroup$
    – drjpizzle
    Feb 6 at 14:47














38












38








38





$begingroup$

Deflagration means that the combustion moves through the fuel slower than the speed of sound in the fuel. It doesn't say anything about the speed of the resulting gas, or how it compares to the speed of sound in that gas (and the speed of sound in solids is generally higher than that of gasses). The gas that is released from the combustion isn't at equilibrium, so properties such as "pressure", "temperature", and thus "speed of sound" aren't fully defined for it.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Deflagration means that the combustion moves through the fuel slower than the speed of sound in the fuel. It doesn't say anything about the speed of the resulting gas, or how it compares to the speed of sound in that gas (and the speed of sound in solids is generally higher than that of gasses). The gas that is released from the combustion isn't at equilibrium, so properties such as "pressure", "temperature", and thus "speed of sound" aren't fully defined for it.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Feb 4 at 17:34









AcccumulationAcccumulation

2,566312




2,566312








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This does limit the combustion process though. If the medium is moving faster than the flame front, unburned fuel downstream of the flame front isn't ever burned. This is a huge oversimplification. There is a lot of nuance to this speed relative to what etc, but the upshot is that unconfined there is a limit on the speed of the resulting gas dependent on among other factors the speed of combustion.
    $endgroup$
    – drjpizzle
    Feb 6 at 14:47














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This does limit the combustion process though. If the medium is moving faster than the flame front, unburned fuel downstream of the flame front isn't ever burned. This is a huge oversimplification. There is a lot of nuance to this speed relative to what etc, but the upshot is that unconfined there is a limit on the speed of the resulting gas dependent on among other factors the speed of combustion.
    $endgroup$
    – drjpizzle
    Feb 6 at 14:47








1




1




$begingroup$
This does limit the combustion process though. If the medium is moving faster than the flame front, unburned fuel downstream of the flame front isn't ever burned. This is a huge oversimplification. There is a lot of nuance to this speed relative to what etc, but the upshot is that unconfined there is a limit on the speed of the resulting gas dependent on among other factors the speed of combustion.
$endgroup$
– drjpizzle
Feb 6 at 14:47




$begingroup$
This does limit the combustion process though. If the medium is moving faster than the flame front, unburned fuel downstream of the flame front isn't ever burned. This is a huge oversimplification. There is a lot of nuance to this speed relative to what etc, but the upshot is that unconfined there is a limit on the speed of the resulting gas dependent on among other factors the speed of combustion.
$endgroup$
– drjpizzle
Feb 6 at 14:47


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f458828%2fhow-do-we-get-supersonic-bullets%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

Aardman Animations

Are they similar matrix