How can I remove an uncessessary extended partition with only one member in gparted?
I've been changing this hard drive around, and have stumbled into this problem. I'm trying to get my hard drive back to just its original 4 partitions, but I can't seem to get rid of the "shell" of an extended partition. Right now, it's structure like:
/dev/sda1
/dev/sda2
/dev/sda3 (EXTENDED)
/dev/sda5 (logical)
/dev/sda4
I would like to "pull out" /dev/sda5 and replace /dev/sda3 entirely with it. from the extended partition and get rid of it entirely.
/dev/sda1
/dev/sda2
/dev/sda3 (formerly /dev/sda5)
/dev/sda4
Is this possible?
linux partitioning gparted logical-drive
add a comment |
I've been changing this hard drive around, and have stumbled into this problem. I'm trying to get my hard drive back to just its original 4 partitions, but I can't seem to get rid of the "shell" of an extended partition. Right now, it's structure like:
/dev/sda1
/dev/sda2
/dev/sda3 (EXTENDED)
/dev/sda5 (logical)
/dev/sda4
I would like to "pull out" /dev/sda5 and replace /dev/sda3 entirely with it. from the extended partition and get rid of it entirely.
/dev/sda1
/dev/sda2
/dev/sda3 (formerly /dev/sda5)
/dev/sda4
Is this possible?
linux partitioning gparted logical-drive
/dev/sda3 is the group partition containing the /dev/sda5 extended partition. So, you already have just 4 partitions: sda1, 2, 5 & 4. Ignore sda3 as the group or container. I'm not sure what are you trying to get rid of ?
– Prahlad Yeri
Aug 10 '12 at 8:40
Are there any consequences to having this unnecessary container? I'm trying to make it so it has only 4 primary partitions, the extended partition doesn't need to be there.
– cemulate
Aug 10 '12 at 13:01
1
There are no "consequences" to having a container. It is a natural side effect of having an extended/logical partition within a primary one. Also, extended partition has no feature restrictions compared to primary, its only to facilitate your having more than 4 overall number of partitions. In short, you don't need to worry about it!
– Prahlad Yeri
Aug 10 '12 at 13:32
add a comment |
I've been changing this hard drive around, and have stumbled into this problem. I'm trying to get my hard drive back to just its original 4 partitions, but I can't seem to get rid of the "shell" of an extended partition. Right now, it's structure like:
/dev/sda1
/dev/sda2
/dev/sda3 (EXTENDED)
/dev/sda5 (logical)
/dev/sda4
I would like to "pull out" /dev/sda5 and replace /dev/sda3 entirely with it. from the extended partition and get rid of it entirely.
/dev/sda1
/dev/sda2
/dev/sda3 (formerly /dev/sda5)
/dev/sda4
Is this possible?
linux partitioning gparted logical-drive
I've been changing this hard drive around, and have stumbled into this problem. I'm trying to get my hard drive back to just its original 4 partitions, but I can't seem to get rid of the "shell" of an extended partition. Right now, it's structure like:
/dev/sda1
/dev/sda2
/dev/sda3 (EXTENDED)
/dev/sda5 (logical)
/dev/sda4
I would like to "pull out" /dev/sda5 and replace /dev/sda3 entirely with it. from the extended partition and get rid of it entirely.
/dev/sda1
/dev/sda2
/dev/sda3 (formerly /dev/sda5)
/dev/sda4
Is this possible?
linux partitioning gparted logical-drive
linux partitioning gparted logical-drive
asked Aug 9 '12 at 20:45
cemulatecemulate
44141019
44141019
/dev/sda3 is the group partition containing the /dev/sda5 extended partition. So, you already have just 4 partitions: sda1, 2, 5 & 4. Ignore sda3 as the group or container. I'm not sure what are you trying to get rid of ?
– Prahlad Yeri
Aug 10 '12 at 8:40
Are there any consequences to having this unnecessary container? I'm trying to make it so it has only 4 primary partitions, the extended partition doesn't need to be there.
– cemulate
Aug 10 '12 at 13:01
1
There are no "consequences" to having a container. It is a natural side effect of having an extended/logical partition within a primary one. Also, extended partition has no feature restrictions compared to primary, its only to facilitate your having more than 4 overall number of partitions. In short, you don't need to worry about it!
– Prahlad Yeri
Aug 10 '12 at 13:32
add a comment |
/dev/sda3 is the group partition containing the /dev/sda5 extended partition. So, you already have just 4 partitions: sda1, 2, 5 & 4. Ignore sda3 as the group or container. I'm not sure what are you trying to get rid of ?
– Prahlad Yeri
Aug 10 '12 at 8:40
Are there any consequences to having this unnecessary container? I'm trying to make it so it has only 4 primary partitions, the extended partition doesn't need to be there.
– cemulate
Aug 10 '12 at 13:01
1
There are no "consequences" to having a container. It is a natural side effect of having an extended/logical partition within a primary one. Also, extended partition has no feature restrictions compared to primary, its only to facilitate your having more than 4 overall number of partitions. In short, you don't need to worry about it!
– Prahlad Yeri
Aug 10 '12 at 13:32
/dev/sda3 is the group partition containing the /dev/sda5 extended partition. So, you already have just 4 partitions: sda1, 2, 5 & 4. Ignore sda3 as the group or container. I'm not sure what are you trying to get rid of ?
– Prahlad Yeri
Aug 10 '12 at 8:40
/dev/sda3 is the group partition containing the /dev/sda5 extended partition. So, you already have just 4 partitions: sda1, 2, 5 & 4. Ignore sda3 as the group or container. I'm not sure what are you trying to get rid of ?
– Prahlad Yeri
Aug 10 '12 at 8:40
Are there any consequences to having this unnecessary container? I'm trying to make it so it has only 4 primary partitions, the extended partition doesn't need to be there.
– cemulate
Aug 10 '12 at 13:01
Are there any consequences to having this unnecessary container? I'm trying to make it so it has only 4 primary partitions, the extended partition doesn't need to be there.
– cemulate
Aug 10 '12 at 13:01
1
1
There are no "consequences" to having a container. It is a natural side effect of having an extended/logical partition within a primary one. Also, extended partition has no feature restrictions compared to primary, its only to facilitate your having more than 4 overall number of partitions. In short, you don't need to worry about it!
– Prahlad Yeri
Aug 10 '12 at 13:32
There are no "consequences" to having a container. It is a natural side effect of having an extended/logical partition within a primary one. Also, extended partition has no feature restrictions compared to primary, its only to facilitate your having more than 4 overall number of partitions. In short, you don't need to worry about it!
– Prahlad Yeri
Aug 10 '12 at 13:32
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Use gparted utility to first delete
/dev/sda5and the deleting
/dev/sda3and here you will get rid of extended partition, the it should be
/dev/sda1
/dev/sda2
free space
/dev/sda4
now create new primary partition with your choice of file system. thats it its done.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f459720%2fhow-can-i-remove-an-uncessessary-extended-partition-with-only-one-member-in-gpar%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Use gparted utility to first delete
/dev/sda5and the deleting
/dev/sda3and here you will get rid of extended partition, the it should be
/dev/sda1
/dev/sda2
free space
/dev/sda4
now create new primary partition with your choice of file system. thats it its done.
add a comment |
Use gparted utility to first delete
/dev/sda5and the deleting
/dev/sda3and here you will get rid of extended partition, the it should be
/dev/sda1
/dev/sda2
free space
/dev/sda4
now create new primary partition with your choice of file system. thats it its done.
add a comment |
Use gparted utility to first delete
/dev/sda5and the deleting
/dev/sda3and here you will get rid of extended partition, the it should be
/dev/sda1
/dev/sda2
free space
/dev/sda4
now create new primary partition with your choice of file system. thats it its done.
Use gparted utility to first delete
/dev/sda5and the deleting
/dev/sda3and here you will get rid of extended partition, the it should be
/dev/sda1
/dev/sda2
free space
/dev/sda4
now create new primary partition with your choice of file system. thats it its done.
answered Jan 2 '13 at 14:08
Samir ChauhanSamir Chauhan
318
318
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f459720%2fhow-can-i-remove-an-uncessessary-extended-partition-with-only-one-member-in-gpar%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
/dev/sda3 is the group partition containing the /dev/sda5 extended partition. So, you already have just 4 partitions: sda1, 2, 5 & 4. Ignore sda3 as the group or container. I'm not sure what are you trying to get rid of ?
– Prahlad Yeri
Aug 10 '12 at 8:40
Are there any consequences to having this unnecessary container? I'm trying to make it so it has only 4 primary partitions, the extended partition doesn't need to be there.
– cemulate
Aug 10 '12 at 13:01
1
There are no "consequences" to having a container. It is a natural side effect of having an extended/logical partition within a primary one. Also, extended partition has no feature restrictions compared to primary, its only to facilitate your having more than 4 overall number of partitions. In short, you don't need to worry about it!
– Prahlad Yeri
Aug 10 '12 at 13:32