About Locally Convex Frèchet Space
$begingroup$
I need to proof the following statements, having $ quad X = {x_n : mathbb{N} rightarrow mathbb{C}}$ and $p_j = max_{k le j}|x(k)|$
1)$p_j$ is a countable family of seminorms which induces Hausdorff topology
2) $(X,{p_j})$ is a Frèchet space
For 1) I know that a countable family of seminorms induces Hausdorff topology if $quad forall x in X-0 quad exists p in {p_j} : p(x) > 0$. So of course any non-null sequence satisfies this condition.
But how should I prove 2)? First I should prove that it is a locally convex space, but I don't know where to start...
functional-analysis locally-convex-spaces
asked Dec 27 '18 at 16:58
James ArtenJames Arten
13411
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I need to proof the following statements, having $ quad X = {x_n : mathbb{N} rightarrow mathbb{C}}$ and $p_j = max_{k le j}|x(k)|$
1)$p_j$ is a countable family of seminorms which induces Hausdorff topology
2) $(X,{p_j})$ is a Frèchet space
For 1) I know that a countable family of seminorms induces Hausdorff topology if $quad forall x in X-0 quad exists p in {p_j} : p(x) > 0$. So of course any non-null sequence satisfies this condition.
But how should I prove 2)? First I should prove that it is a locally convex space, but I don't know where to start...
functional-analysis locally-convex-spaces
asked Dec 27 '18 at 16:58
James ArtenJames Arten
13411
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
A vector space with a family of seminorms is always locally convex. So to prove that $X$ is a Fréchet space, it remains only to see that the metric induced by the countable family of seminorms is complete. (see the alternative definition of a Fréchet space here)
$endgroup$
– Michh
Dec 28 '18 at 2:43
$begingroup$
I found a statement which says that Any Frèchet Space satisfies the first numerability axiom. But Every metric space satisfies it, so should I conclude that any metric space is Frèchet?.. I don't think so.. I need completeness...
$endgroup$
– James Arten
Dec 30 '18 at 17:52
$begingroup$
I cannot figure out the problem here. To prove that a vector space is a Fréchet space, you need to prove that: (i) the topology is induced by a countable family of seminorms, (ii) the family is separating (i.e. $forall x neq 0, exists j$ such that $p_j(x) > 0$) and (iii) the metric induced by the family of seminorms is complete. In particular, there is no need to prove that the space is locally convex since this follows from point (i).
$endgroup$
– Michh
Jan 1 at 10:59
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I need to proof the following statements, having $ quad X = {x_n : mathbb{N} rightarrow mathbb{C}}$ and $p_j = max_{k le j}|x(k)|$
1)$p_j$ is a countable family of seminorms which induces Hausdorff topology
2) $(X,{p_j})$ is a Frèchet space
For 1) I know that a countable family of seminorms induces Hausdorff topology if $quad forall x in X-0 quad exists p in {p_j} : p(x) > 0$. So of course any non-null sequence satisfies this condition.
But how should I prove 2)? First I should prove that it is a locally convex space, but I don't know where to start...
functional-analysis locally-convex-spaces
asked Dec 27 '18 at 16:58
James ArtenJames Arten
13411
$endgroup$
I need to proof the following statements, having $ quad X = {x_n : mathbb{N} rightarrow mathbb{C}}$ and $p_j = max_{k le j}|x(k)|$
1)$p_j$ is a countable family of seminorms which induces Hausdorff topology
2) $(X,{p_j})$ is a Frèchet space
For 1) I know that a countable family of seminorms induces Hausdorff topology if $quad forall x in X-0 quad exists p in {p_j} : p(x) > 0$. So of course any non-null sequence satisfies this condition.
But how should I prove 2)? First I should prove that it is a locally convex space, but I don't know where to start...
functional-analysis locally-convex-spaces
functional-analysis locally-convex-spaces
asked Dec 27 '18 at 16:58
James ArtenJames Arten
13411
asked Dec 27 '18 at 16:58
James ArtenJames Arten
13411
asked Dec 27 '18 at 16:58
James ArtenJames Arten
13411
asked Dec 27 '18 at 16:58
James ArtenJames Arten
13411
asked Dec 27 '18 at 16:58
James ArtenJames Arten
13411
13411
$begingroup$
A vector space with a family of seminorms is always locally convex. So to prove that $X$ is a Fréchet space, it remains only to see that the metric induced by the countable family of seminorms is complete. (see the alternative definition of a Fréchet space here)
$endgroup$
– Michh
Dec 28 '18 at 2:43
$begingroup$
I found a statement which says that Any Frèchet Space satisfies the first numerability axiom. But Every metric space satisfies it, so should I conclude that any metric space is Frèchet?.. I don't think so.. I need completeness...
$endgroup$
– James Arten
Dec 30 '18 at 17:52
$begingroup$
I cannot figure out the problem here. To prove that a vector space is a Fréchet space, you need to prove that: (i) the topology is induced by a countable family of seminorms, (ii) the family is separating (i.e. $forall x neq 0, exists j$ such that $p_j(x) > 0$) and (iii) the metric induced by the family of seminorms is complete. In particular, there is no need to prove that the space is locally convex since this follows from point (i).
$endgroup$
– Michh
Jan 1 at 10:59
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A vector space with a family of seminorms is always locally convex. So to prove that $X$ is a Fréchet space, it remains only to see that the metric induced by the countable family of seminorms is complete. (see the alternative definition of a Fréchet space here)
$endgroup$
– Michh
Dec 28 '18 at 2:43
$begingroup$
I found a statement which says that Any Frèchet Space satisfies the first numerability axiom. But Every metric space satisfies it, so should I conclude that any metric space is Frèchet?.. I don't think so.. I need completeness...
$endgroup$
– James Arten
Dec 30 '18 at 17:52
$begingroup$
I cannot figure out the problem here. To prove that a vector space is a Fréchet space, you need to prove that: (i) the topology is induced by a countable family of seminorms, (ii) the family is separating (i.e. $forall x neq 0, exists j$ such that $p_j(x) > 0$) and (iii) the metric induced by the family of seminorms is complete. In particular, there is no need to prove that the space is locally convex since this follows from point (i).
$endgroup$
– Michh
Jan 1 at 10:59
$begingroup$
A vector space with a family of seminorms is always locally convex. So to prove that $X$ is a Fréchet space, it remains only to see that the metric induced by the countable family of seminorms is complete. (see the alternative definition of a Fréchet space here)
$endgroup$
– Michh
Dec 28 '18 at 2:43
$begingroup$
A vector space with a family of seminorms is always locally convex. So to prove that $X$ is a Fréchet space, it remains only to see that the metric induced by the countable family of seminorms is complete. (see the alternative definition of a Fréchet space here)
$endgroup$
– Michh
Dec 28 '18 at 2:43
$begingroup$
I found a statement which says that Any Frèchet Space satisfies the first numerability axiom. But Every metric space satisfies it, so should I conclude that any metric space is Frèchet?.. I don't think so.. I need completeness...
$endgroup$
– James Arten
Dec 30 '18 at 17:52
$begingroup$
I found a statement which says that Any Frèchet Space satisfies the first numerability axiom. But Every metric space satisfies it, so should I conclude that any metric space is Frèchet?.. I don't think so.. I need completeness...
$endgroup$
– James Arten
Dec 30 '18 at 17:52
$begingroup$
I cannot figure out the problem here. To prove that a vector space is a Fréchet space, you need to prove that: (i) the topology is induced by a countable family of seminorms, (ii) the family is separating (i.e. $forall x neq 0, exists j$ such that $p_j(x) > 0$) and (iii) the metric induced by the family of seminorms is complete. In particular, there is no need to prove that the space is locally convex since this follows from point (i).
$endgroup$
– Michh
Jan 1 at 10:59
$begingroup$
I cannot figure out the problem here. To prove that a vector space is a Fréchet space, you need to prove that: (i) the topology is induced by a countable family of seminorms, (ii) the family is separating (i.e. $forall x neq 0, exists j$ such that $p_j(x) > 0$) and (iii) the metric induced by the family of seminorms is complete. In particular, there is no need to prove that the space is locally convex since this follows from point (i).
$endgroup$
– Michh
Jan 1 at 10:59
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054157%2fabout-locally-convex-fr%25c3%25a8chet-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054157%2fabout-locally-convex-fr%25c3%25a8chet-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
A vector space with a family of seminorms is always locally convex. So to prove that $X$ is a Fréchet space, it remains only to see that the metric induced by the countable family of seminorms is complete. (see the alternative definition of a Fréchet space here)
$endgroup$
– Michh
Dec 28 '18 at 2:43
$begingroup$
I found a statement which says that Any Frèchet Space satisfies the first numerability axiom. But Every metric space satisfies it, so should I conclude that any metric space is Frèchet?.. I don't think so.. I need completeness...
$endgroup$
– James Arten
Dec 30 '18 at 17:52
$begingroup$
I cannot figure out the problem here. To prove that a vector space is a Fréchet space, you need to prove that: (i) the topology is induced by a countable family of seminorms, (ii) the family is separating (i.e. $forall x neq 0, exists j$ such that $p_j(x) > 0$) and (iii) the metric induced by the family of seminorms is complete. In particular, there is no need to prove that the space is locally convex since this follows from point (i).
$endgroup$
– Michh
Jan 1 at 10:59