Uneven placement of 6 subfigures












7














Is there a way to arrange the subfigures in the following way in LATEX?



enter image description here










share|improve this question





























    7














    Is there a way to arrange the subfigures in the following way in LATEX?



    enter image description here










    share|improve this question



























      7












      7








      7


      1





      Is there a way to arrange the subfigures in the following way in LATEX?



      enter image description here










      share|improve this question















      Is there a way to arrange the subfigures in the following way in LATEX?



      enter image description here







      subfloats






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Dec 24 '18 at 17:16









      Circumscribe

      4,8011533




      4,8011533










      asked Dec 24 '18 at 17:06









      sinapansinapan

      415




      415






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          7














          The final choice of parameters may depend on the proportions of the images.



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{graphicx}

          begin{document}

          begin{figure}[htp]
          centering

          sbox{0}{includegraphics[width=0.65textwidth]{example-image}}% The big figure

          begin{tabular}{@{}c@{hspace{0.05textwidth}}c@{}}
          usebox{0} &
          parbox[b][ht0][s]{0.3textwidth}{
          includegraphics[width=0.3textwidth]{example-image}
          vfill
          includegraphics[width=0.3textwidth]{example-image}
          }
          \[0.03textwidth]
          includegraphics[width=0.3textwidth]{example-image}
          hfill
          includegraphics[width=0.3textwidth]{example-image} &
          includegraphics[width=0.3textwidth]{example-image}
          end{tabular}

          end{figure}

          end{document}


          The right column is made of two parts: the top one is a parbox as high as the big figure, so the alignments are precise.



          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer





























            7














            Welcome to TeX.SE! There are numerous possibilities to achieve something of this sort, here is one.



            documentclass{article}
            usepackage{multirow}
            usepackage{graphicx}
            begin{document}
            begin{figure}[htb]
            centering
            begin{tabular}{*{3}{@{hspace*{1mm}}c}}
            multicolumn{2}{@{hspace*{1mm}}c}{raisebox{1.5cm}{multirow{2}{*}{includegraphics[width=6.2cm]{example-image-duck}}}}
            &includegraphics[width=3cm]{example-image-duck}\[1mm]
            & &includegraphics[width=3cm]{example-image-duck}\[1mm]
            includegraphics[width=3cm]{example-image-duck}
            & includegraphics[width=3cm]{example-image-duck} &
            includegraphics[width=3cm]{example-image-duck}
            end{tabular}
            end{figure}
            end{document}


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer

















            • 1




              No tikz solution? I'm very disappointed (+1) ;)
              – TeXnician
              Dec 24 '18 at 17:32








            • 1




              @TeXnician TikZ was used to draw the cute duck. ;-)
              – marmot
              Dec 24 '18 at 17:36










            • the two ducks on the side seem to be taller together than the big image.
              – hkBst
              Dec 25 '18 at 10:53










            • @hkBst This impression is because in this answer the horizontal and vertical gaps are the same, let's call the distance g. Now call the ratio between height and width of the graphics r, r=h/w. If the vertical dimensions match, this means that the width of the larger figure is given by W=2*w+g. But then the vertical distance is off because r*W ne 2*r*w+g. It can only match up if the vertical distance is r*g, which I personally find less appealing than having the gaps universal.
              – marmot
              Dec 25 '18 at 14:40











            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "85"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f467203%2funeven-placement-of-6-subfigures%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            7














            The final choice of parameters may depend on the proportions of the images.



            documentclass{article}
            usepackage{graphicx}

            begin{document}

            begin{figure}[htp]
            centering

            sbox{0}{includegraphics[width=0.65textwidth]{example-image}}% The big figure

            begin{tabular}{@{}c@{hspace{0.05textwidth}}c@{}}
            usebox{0} &
            parbox[b][ht0][s]{0.3textwidth}{
            includegraphics[width=0.3textwidth]{example-image}
            vfill
            includegraphics[width=0.3textwidth]{example-image}
            }
            \[0.03textwidth]
            includegraphics[width=0.3textwidth]{example-image}
            hfill
            includegraphics[width=0.3textwidth]{example-image} &
            includegraphics[width=0.3textwidth]{example-image}
            end{tabular}

            end{figure}

            end{document}


            The right column is made of two parts: the top one is a parbox as high as the big figure, so the alignments are precise.



            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer


























              7














              The final choice of parameters may depend on the proportions of the images.



              documentclass{article}
              usepackage{graphicx}

              begin{document}

              begin{figure}[htp]
              centering

              sbox{0}{includegraphics[width=0.65textwidth]{example-image}}% The big figure

              begin{tabular}{@{}c@{hspace{0.05textwidth}}c@{}}
              usebox{0} &
              parbox[b][ht0][s]{0.3textwidth}{
              includegraphics[width=0.3textwidth]{example-image}
              vfill
              includegraphics[width=0.3textwidth]{example-image}
              }
              \[0.03textwidth]
              includegraphics[width=0.3textwidth]{example-image}
              hfill
              includegraphics[width=0.3textwidth]{example-image} &
              includegraphics[width=0.3textwidth]{example-image}
              end{tabular}

              end{figure}

              end{document}


              The right column is made of two parts: the top one is a parbox as high as the big figure, so the alignments are precise.



              enter image description here






              share|improve this answer
























                7












                7








                7






                The final choice of parameters may depend on the proportions of the images.



                documentclass{article}
                usepackage{graphicx}

                begin{document}

                begin{figure}[htp]
                centering

                sbox{0}{includegraphics[width=0.65textwidth]{example-image}}% The big figure

                begin{tabular}{@{}c@{hspace{0.05textwidth}}c@{}}
                usebox{0} &
                parbox[b][ht0][s]{0.3textwidth}{
                includegraphics[width=0.3textwidth]{example-image}
                vfill
                includegraphics[width=0.3textwidth]{example-image}
                }
                \[0.03textwidth]
                includegraphics[width=0.3textwidth]{example-image}
                hfill
                includegraphics[width=0.3textwidth]{example-image} &
                includegraphics[width=0.3textwidth]{example-image}
                end{tabular}

                end{figure}

                end{document}


                The right column is made of two parts: the top one is a parbox as high as the big figure, so the alignments are precise.



                enter image description here






                share|improve this answer












                The final choice of parameters may depend on the proportions of the images.



                documentclass{article}
                usepackage{graphicx}

                begin{document}

                begin{figure}[htp]
                centering

                sbox{0}{includegraphics[width=0.65textwidth]{example-image}}% The big figure

                begin{tabular}{@{}c@{hspace{0.05textwidth}}c@{}}
                usebox{0} &
                parbox[b][ht0][s]{0.3textwidth}{
                includegraphics[width=0.3textwidth]{example-image}
                vfill
                includegraphics[width=0.3textwidth]{example-image}
                }
                \[0.03textwidth]
                includegraphics[width=0.3textwidth]{example-image}
                hfill
                includegraphics[width=0.3textwidth]{example-image} &
                includegraphics[width=0.3textwidth]{example-image}
                end{tabular}

                end{figure}

                end{document}


                The right column is made of two parts: the top one is a parbox as high as the big figure, so the alignments are precise.



                enter image description here







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Dec 24 '18 at 18:06









                egregegreg

                710k8618883172




                710k8618883172























                    7














                    Welcome to TeX.SE! There are numerous possibilities to achieve something of this sort, here is one.



                    documentclass{article}
                    usepackage{multirow}
                    usepackage{graphicx}
                    begin{document}
                    begin{figure}[htb]
                    centering
                    begin{tabular}{*{3}{@{hspace*{1mm}}c}}
                    multicolumn{2}{@{hspace*{1mm}}c}{raisebox{1.5cm}{multirow{2}{*}{includegraphics[width=6.2cm]{example-image-duck}}}}
                    &includegraphics[width=3cm]{example-image-duck}\[1mm]
                    & &includegraphics[width=3cm]{example-image-duck}\[1mm]
                    includegraphics[width=3cm]{example-image-duck}
                    & includegraphics[width=3cm]{example-image-duck} &
                    includegraphics[width=3cm]{example-image-duck}
                    end{tabular}
                    end{figure}
                    end{document}


                    enter image description here






                    share|improve this answer

















                    • 1




                      No tikz solution? I'm very disappointed (+1) ;)
                      – TeXnician
                      Dec 24 '18 at 17:32








                    • 1




                      @TeXnician TikZ was used to draw the cute duck. ;-)
                      – marmot
                      Dec 24 '18 at 17:36










                    • the two ducks on the side seem to be taller together than the big image.
                      – hkBst
                      Dec 25 '18 at 10:53










                    • @hkBst This impression is because in this answer the horizontal and vertical gaps are the same, let's call the distance g. Now call the ratio between height and width of the graphics r, r=h/w. If the vertical dimensions match, this means that the width of the larger figure is given by W=2*w+g. But then the vertical distance is off because r*W ne 2*r*w+g. It can only match up if the vertical distance is r*g, which I personally find less appealing than having the gaps universal.
                      – marmot
                      Dec 25 '18 at 14:40
















                    7














                    Welcome to TeX.SE! There are numerous possibilities to achieve something of this sort, here is one.



                    documentclass{article}
                    usepackage{multirow}
                    usepackage{graphicx}
                    begin{document}
                    begin{figure}[htb]
                    centering
                    begin{tabular}{*{3}{@{hspace*{1mm}}c}}
                    multicolumn{2}{@{hspace*{1mm}}c}{raisebox{1.5cm}{multirow{2}{*}{includegraphics[width=6.2cm]{example-image-duck}}}}
                    &includegraphics[width=3cm]{example-image-duck}\[1mm]
                    & &includegraphics[width=3cm]{example-image-duck}\[1mm]
                    includegraphics[width=3cm]{example-image-duck}
                    & includegraphics[width=3cm]{example-image-duck} &
                    includegraphics[width=3cm]{example-image-duck}
                    end{tabular}
                    end{figure}
                    end{document}


                    enter image description here






                    share|improve this answer

















                    • 1




                      No tikz solution? I'm very disappointed (+1) ;)
                      – TeXnician
                      Dec 24 '18 at 17:32








                    • 1




                      @TeXnician TikZ was used to draw the cute duck. ;-)
                      – marmot
                      Dec 24 '18 at 17:36










                    • the two ducks on the side seem to be taller together than the big image.
                      – hkBst
                      Dec 25 '18 at 10:53










                    • @hkBst This impression is because in this answer the horizontal and vertical gaps are the same, let's call the distance g. Now call the ratio between height and width of the graphics r, r=h/w. If the vertical dimensions match, this means that the width of the larger figure is given by W=2*w+g. But then the vertical distance is off because r*W ne 2*r*w+g. It can only match up if the vertical distance is r*g, which I personally find less appealing than having the gaps universal.
                      – marmot
                      Dec 25 '18 at 14:40














                    7












                    7








                    7






                    Welcome to TeX.SE! There are numerous possibilities to achieve something of this sort, here is one.



                    documentclass{article}
                    usepackage{multirow}
                    usepackage{graphicx}
                    begin{document}
                    begin{figure}[htb]
                    centering
                    begin{tabular}{*{3}{@{hspace*{1mm}}c}}
                    multicolumn{2}{@{hspace*{1mm}}c}{raisebox{1.5cm}{multirow{2}{*}{includegraphics[width=6.2cm]{example-image-duck}}}}
                    &includegraphics[width=3cm]{example-image-duck}\[1mm]
                    & &includegraphics[width=3cm]{example-image-duck}\[1mm]
                    includegraphics[width=3cm]{example-image-duck}
                    & includegraphics[width=3cm]{example-image-duck} &
                    includegraphics[width=3cm]{example-image-duck}
                    end{tabular}
                    end{figure}
                    end{document}


                    enter image description here






                    share|improve this answer












                    Welcome to TeX.SE! There are numerous possibilities to achieve something of this sort, here is one.



                    documentclass{article}
                    usepackage{multirow}
                    usepackage{graphicx}
                    begin{document}
                    begin{figure}[htb]
                    centering
                    begin{tabular}{*{3}{@{hspace*{1mm}}c}}
                    multicolumn{2}{@{hspace*{1mm}}c}{raisebox{1.5cm}{multirow{2}{*}{includegraphics[width=6.2cm]{example-image-duck}}}}
                    &includegraphics[width=3cm]{example-image-duck}\[1mm]
                    & &includegraphics[width=3cm]{example-image-duck}\[1mm]
                    includegraphics[width=3cm]{example-image-duck}
                    & includegraphics[width=3cm]{example-image-duck} &
                    includegraphics[width=3cm]{example-image-duck}
                    end{tabular}
                    end{figure}
                    end{document}


                    enter image description here







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered Dec 24 '18 at 17:19









                    marmotmarmot

                    89.4k4103194




                    89.4k4103194








                    • 1




                      No tikz solution? I'm very disappointed (+1) ;)
                      – TeXnician
                      Dec 24 '18 at 17:32








                    • 1




                      @TeXnician TikZ was used to draw the cute duck. ;-)
                      – marmot
                      Dec 24 '18 at 17:36










                    • the two ducks on the side seem to be taller together than the big image.
                      – hkBst
                      Dec 25 '18 at 10:53










                    • @hkBst This impression is because in this answer the horizontal and vertical gaps are the same, let's call the distance g. Now call the ratio between height and width of the graphics r, r=h/w. If the vertical dimensions match, this means that the width of the larger figure is given by W=2*w+g. But then the vertical distance is off because r*W ne 2*r*w+g. It can only match up if the vertical distance is r*g, which I personally find less appealing than having the gaps universal.
                      – marmot
                      Dec 25 '18 at 14:40














                    • 1




                      No tikz solution? I'm very disappointed (+1) ;)
                      – TeXnician
                      Dec 24 '18 at 17:32








                    • 1




                      @TeXnician TikZ was used to draw the cute duck. ;-)
                      – marmot
                      Dec 24 '18 at 17:36










                    • the two ducks on the side seem to be taller together than the big image.
                      – hkBst
                      Dec 25 '18 at 10:53










                    • @hkBst This impression is because in this answer the horizontal and vertical gaps are the same, let's call the distance g. Now call the ratio between height and width of the graphics r, r=h/w. If the vertical dimensions match, this means that the width of the larger figure is given by W=2*w+g. But then the vertical distance is off because r*W ne 2*r*w+g. It can only match up if the vertical distance is r*g, which I personally find less appealing than having the gaps universal.
                      – marmot
                      Dec 25 '18 at 14:40








                    1




                    1




                    No tikz solution? I'm very disappointed (+1) ;)
                    – TeXnician
                    Dec 24 '18 at 17:32






                    No tikz solution? I'm very disappointed (+1) ;)
                    – TeXnician
                    Dec 24 '18 at 17:32






                    1




                    1




                    @TeXnician TikZ was used to draw the cute duck. ;-)
                    – marmot
                    Dec 24 '18 at 17:36




                    @TeXnician TikZ was used to draw the cute duck. ;-)
                    – marmot
                    Dec 24 '18 at 17:36












                    the two ducks on the side seem to be taller together than the big image.
                    – hkBst
                    Dec 25 '18 at 10:53




                    the two ducks on the side seem to be taller together than the big image.
                    – hkBst
                    Dec 25 '18 at 10:53












                    @hkBst This impression is because in this answer the horizontal and vertical gaps are the same, let's call the distance g. Now call the ratio between height and width of the graphics r, r=h/w. If the vertical dimensions match, this means that the width of the larger figure is given by W=2*w+g. But then the vertical distance is off because r*W ne 2*r*w+g. It can only match up if the vertical distance is r*g, which I personally find less appealing than having the gaps universal.
                    – marmot
                    Dec 25 '18 at 14:40




                    @hkBst This impression is because in this answer the horizontal and vertical gaps are the same, let's call the distance g. Now call the ratio between height and width of the graphics r, r=h/w. If the vertical dimensions match, this means that the width of the larger figure is given by W=2*w+g. But then the vertical distance is off because r*W ne 2*r*w+g. It can only match up if the vertical distance is r*g, which I personally find less appealing than having the gaps universal.
                    – marmot
                    Dec 25 '18 at 14:40


















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f467203%2funeven-placement-of-6-subfigures%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

                    Aardman Animations

                    Are they similar matrix