Row reducing matrices to obtain the eigenvector












0














Find all distinct (real or complex) eigenvalues of $A$. Then find the basic eigenvectors of $A$ corresponding to each eigenvalue. For each eigenvalue, specify the number of basic eigenvectors corresponding to that eigenvalue.



$A = begin{bmatrix}-16 & -10\17& 10end{bmatrix}$



So $A -lambda I = begin{bmatrix}-16-lambda & -10\17& 10-lambdaend{bmatrix}$



Which means $det(A-lambda I) = lambda^2 + 6lambda - 10$



Therefore, using the quadratic formula, the eigenvalues should be:



$lambda = -3pm sqrt(19)i$



So now I get the two eigenvectors which are:



$B = begin{bmatrix}-13 - sqrt19i& -10\17& 13 - sqrt19iend{bmatrix}$



$C = begin{bmatrix}-13 + sqrt19i& -10\17& 13 + sqrt19iend{bmatrix}$



Now the part I am struggling is finding out how to row reduce these matrices in order to obtain the answer:



For example, with $B$:



$Bx = 0$



$Bx = begin{bmatrix}-13 - sqrt19i& -10\17& 13 - sqrt19iend{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix}x1\x2end{bmatrix} = begin{bmatrix}0\0end{bmatrix}$



I know I have to do row operations to first get zeroes in the bottom row, and then to get a 1 in the first row/column, but I don't know how. This requires dealing with complex numbers, and I am not sure how to do it in this scenario. Could someone give me a detailed walkthrough on how to do this?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Eigenvectors are vectors, not matrices. Your $B$ and $C$ are the matrices $A-lambda I$, not the eigenvectors of $A$.
    – amd
    Nov 30 '18 at 2:44
















0














Find all distinct (real or complex) eigenvalues of $A$. Then find the basic eigenvectors of $A$ corresponding to each eigenvalue. For each eigenvalue, specify the number of basic eigenvectors corresponding to that eigenvalue.



$A = begin{bmatrix}-16 & -10\17& 10end{bmatrix}$



So $A -lambda I = begin{bmatrix}-16-lambda & -10\17& 10-lambdaend{bmatrix}$



Which means $det(A-lambda I) = lambda^2 + 6lambda - 10$



Therefore, using the quadratic formula, the eigenvalues should be:



$lambda = -3pm sqrt(19)i$



So now I get the two eigenvectors which are:



$B = begin{bmatrix}-13 - sqrt19i& -10\17& 13 - sqrt19iend{bmatrix}$



$C = begin{bmatrix}-13 + sqrt19i& -10\17& 13 + sqrt19iend{bmatrix}$



Now the part I am struggling is finding out how to row reduce these matrices in order to obtain the answer:



For example, with $B$:



$Bx = 0$



$Bx = begin{bmatrix}-13 - sqrt19i& -10\17& 13 - sqrt19iend{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix}x1\x2end{bmatrix} = begin{bmatrix}0\0end{bmatrix}$



I know I have to do row operations to first get zeroes in the bottom row, and then to get a 1 in the first row/column, but I don't know how. This requires dealing with complex numbers, and I am not sure how to do it in this scenario. Could someone give me a detailed walkthrough on how to do this?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Eigenvectors are vectors, not matrices. Your $B$ and $C$ are the matrices $A-lambda I$, not the eigenvectors of $A$.
    – amd
    Nov 30 '18 at 2:44














0












0








0







Find all distinct (real or complex) eigenvalues of $A$. Then find the basic eigenvectors of $A$ corresponding to each eigenvalue. For each eigenvalue, specify the number of basic eigenvectors corresponding to that eigenvalue.



$A = begin{bmatrix}-16 & -10\17& 10end{bmatrix}$



So $A -lambda I = begin{bmatrix}-16-lambda & -10\17& 10-lambdaend{bmatrix}$



Which means $det(A-lambda I) = lambda^2 + 6lambda - 10$



Therefore, using the quadratic formula, the eigenvalues should be:



$lambda = -3pm sqrt(19)i$



So now I get the two eigenvectors which are:



$B = begin{bmatrix}-13 - sqrt19i& -10\17& 13 - sqrt19iend{bmatrix}$



$C = begin{bmatrix}-13 + sqrt19i& -10\17& 13 + sqrt19iend{bmatrix}$



Now the part I am struggling is finding out how to row reduce these matrices in order to obtain the answer:



For example, with $B$:



$Bx = 0$



$Bx = begin{bmatrix}-13 - sqrt19i& -10\17& 13 - sqrt19iend{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix}x1\x2end{bmatrix} = begin{bmatrix}0\0end{bmatrix}$



I know I have to do row operations to first get zeroes in the bottom row, and then to get a 1 in the first row/column, but I don't know how. This requires dealing with complex numbers, and I am not sure how to do it in this scenario. Could someone give me a detailed walkthrough on how to do this?










share|cite|improve this question













Find all distinct (real or complex) eigenvalues of $A$. Then find the basic eigenvectors of $A$ corresponding to each eigenvalue. For each eigenvalue, specify the number of basic eigenvectors corresponding to that eigenvalue.



$A = begin{bmatrix}-16 & -10\17& 10end{bmatrix}$



So $A -lambda I = begin{bmatrix}-16-lambda & -10\17& 10-lambdaend{bmatrix}$



Which means $det(A-lambda I) = lambda^2 + 6lambda - 10$



Therefore, using the quadratic formula, the eigenvalues should be:



$lambda = -3pm sqrt(19)i$



So now I get the two eigenvectors which are:



$B = begin{bmatrix}-13 - sqrt19i& -10\17& 13 - sqrt19iend{bmatrix}$



$C = begin{bmatrix}-13 + sqrt19i& -10\17& 13 + sqrt19iend{bmatrix}$



Now the part I am struggling is finding out how to row reduce these matrices in order to obtain the answer:



For example, with $B$:



$Bx = 0$



$Bx = begin{bmatrix}-13 - sqrt19i& -10\17& 13 - sqrt19iend{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix}x1\x2end{bmatrix} = begin{bmatrix}0\0end{bmatrix}$



I know I have to do row operations to first get zeroes in the bottom row, and then to get a 1 in the first row/column, but I don't know how. This requires dealing with complex numbers, and I am not sure how to do it in this scenario. Could someone give me a detailed walkthrough on how to do this?







linear-algebra complex-numbers eigenvalues-eigenvectors






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 30 '18 at 1:55









qbufferqbuffer

13




13












  • Eigenvectors are vectors, not matrices. Your $B$ and $C$ are the matrices $A-lambda I$, not the eigenvectors of $A$.
    – amd
    Nov 30 '18 at 2:44


















  • Eigenvectors are vectors, not matrices. Your $B$ and $C$ are the matrices $A-lambda I$, not the eigenvectors of $A$.
    – amd
    Nov 30 '18 at 2:44
















Eigenvectors are vectors, not matrices. Your $B$ and $C$ are the matrices $A-lambda I$, not the eigenvectors of $A$.
– amd
Nov 30 '18 at 2:44




Eigenvectors are vectors, not matrices. Your $B$ and $C$ are the matrices $A-lambda I$, not the eigenvectors of $A$.
– amd
Nov 30 '18 at 2:44










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














$$(lambda - lambda_1)(lambda - lambda_2) = lambda^2-(lambda_1+lambda_2)lambda+lambda_1lambda_2=lambda^2-trace(A)lambda +det(A)$$



$$trace(A)=-16+10=-6$$



$$det(A)=-160+170=10$$



The characteristic polynomial is $lambda^2+6lambda color{red}{+} 10$.



$$lambda = frac{-6 pmsqrt{6^2-40}}{2}$$



Upon trying to solve for the equation $$(A-lambda I)v=0$$



If $lambda$ is indeed an eigenvalue, then the matrix is rank $1$ for this $2 times 2$ matrix. You can just focus on a non-zero row and ignroe the other constraint as it doesn't give you extra information.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3019516%2frow-reducing-matrices-to-obtain-the-eigenvector%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    $$(lambda - lambda_1)(lambda - lambda_2) = lambda^2-(lambda_1+lambda_2)lambda+lambda_1lambda_2=lambda^2-trace(A)lambda +det(A)$$



    $$trace(A)=-16+10=-6$$



    $$det(A)=-160+170=10$$



    The characteristic polynomial is $lambda^2+6lambda color{red}{+} 10$.



    $$lambda = frac{-6 pmsqrt{6^2-40}}{2}$$



    Upon trying to solve for the equation $$(A-lambda I)v=0$$



    If $lambda$ is indeed an eigenvalue, then the matrix is rank $1$ for this $2 times 2$ matrix. You can just focus on a non-zero row and ignroe the other constraint as it doesn't give you extra information.






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      0














      $$(lambda - lambda_1)(lambda - lambda_2) = lambda^2-(lambda_1+lambda_2)lambda+lambda_1lambda_2=lambda^2-trace(A)lambda +det(A)$$



      $$trace(A)=-16+10=-6$$



      $$det(A)=-160+170=10$$



      The characteristic polynomial is $lambda^2+6lambda color{red}{+} 10$.



      $$lambda = frac{-6 pmsqrt{6^2-40}}{2}$$



      Upon trying to solve for the equation $$(A-lambda I)v=0$$



      If $lambda$ is indeed an eigenvalue, then the matrix is rank $1$ for this $2 times 2$ matrix. You can just focus on a non-zero row and ignroe the other constraint as it doesn't give you extra information.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        0












        0








        0






        $$(lambda - lambda_1)(lambda - lambda_2) = lambda^2-(lambda_1+lambda_2)lambda+lambda_1lambda_2=lambda^2-trace(A)lambda +det(A)$$



        $$trace(A)=-16+10=-6$$



        $$det(A)=-160+170=10$$



        The characteristic polynomial is $lambda^2+6lambda color{red}{+} 10$.



        $$lambda = frac{-6 pmsqrt{6^2-40}}{2}$$



        Upon trying to solve for the equation $$(A-lambda I)v=0$$



        If $lambda$ is indeed an eigenvalue, then the matrix is rank $1$ for this $2 times 2$ matrix. You can just focus on a non-zero row and ignroe the other constraint as it doesn't give you extra information.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        $$(lambda - lambda_1)(lambda - lambda_2) = lambda^2-(lambda_1+lambda_2)lambda+lambda_1lambda_2=lambda^2-trace(A)lambda +det(A)$$



        $$trace(A)=-16+10=-6$$



        $$det(A)=-160+170=10$$



        The characteristic polynomial is $lambda^2+6lambda color{red}{+} 10$.



        $$lambda = frac{-6 pmsqrt{6^2-40}}{2}$$



        Upon trying to solve for the equation $$(A-lambda I)v=0$$



        If $lambda$ is indeed an eigenvalue, then the matrix is rank $1$ for this $2 times 2$ matrix. You can just focus on a non-zero row and ignroe the other constraint as it doesn't give you extra information.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 30 '18 at 2:10









        Siong Thye GohSiong Thye Goh

        99.6k1464117




        99.6k1464117






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3019516%2frow-reducing-matrices-to-obtain-the-eigenvector%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

            Aardman Animations

            Are they similar matrix