Nil radical of $(n)$ in $mathbb{Z}$












0












$begingroup$


I did not understand the following proof, from time to time the questions will be inserted at the critical point.



In the ring $mathbb{Z}$, let us show that if $n=p_1^{k_1}p_2^{k_2}cdots p_r^{k_r}$ is a factorization of the positive integer $nne 1$ into distinct primes $p_j$, then $$sqrt(n)=(p_1cdots p_r).$$



Indeed, if the integer $a=p_1cdots p_r$ and $k=max{k_1,k_2dots,k_r}$, then we have $a^kin (n)$ (Why?); this makes clear that $(p_1p_2cdots p_r)subseteq sqrt (n)$ (Why?).



On the other hand, if some positive integral power of the integer $m$ is divisible by $n$ (that is, if $minsqrt (n)$), then $m$ itself must be divisible by each of the primes $p_1, p_2,dots, p_r$ (why?) and, hence, a member of the ideal $$(p_1)cap (p_2)capcdotscap(p_r)=(p_1p_2cdots p_r)quadtext{Why?}.$$



Thanks for your patience!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I did not understand the following proof, from time to time the questions will be inserted at the critical point.



    In the ring $mathbb{Z}$, let us show that if $n=p_1^{k_1}p_2^{k_2}cdots p_r^{k_r}$ is a factorization of the positive integer $nne 1$ into distinct primes $p_j$, then $$sqrt(n)=(p_1cdots p_r).$$



    Indeed, if the integer $a=p_1cdots p_r$ and $k=max{k_1,k_2dots,k_r}$, then we have $a^kin (n)$ (Why?); this makes clear that $(p_1p_2cdots p_r)subseteq sqrt (n)$ (Why?).



    On the other hand, if some positive integral power of the integer $m$ is divisible by $n$ (that is, if $minsqrt (n)$), then $m$ itself must be divisible by each of the primes $p_1, p_2,dots, p_r$ (why?) and, hence, a member of the ideal $$(p_1)cap (p_2)capcdotscap(p_r)=(p_1p_2cdots p_r)quadtext{Why?}.$$



    Thanks for your patience!










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I did not understand the following proof, from time to time the questions will be inserted at the critical point.



      In the ring $mathbb{Z}$, let us show that if $n=p_1^{k_1}p_2^{k_2}cdots p_r^{k_r}$ is a factorization of the positive integer $nne 1$ into distinct primes $p_j$, then $$sqrt(n)=(p_1cdots p_r).$$



      Indeed, if the integer $a=p_1cdots p_r$ and $k=max{k_1,k_2dots,k_r}$, then we have $a^kin (n)$ (Why?); this makes clear that $(p_1p_2cdots p_r)subseteq sqrt (n)$ (Why?).



      On the other hand, if some positive integral power of the integer $m$ is divisible by $n$ (that is, if $minsqrt (n)$), then $m$ itself must be divisible by each of the primes $p_1, p_2,dots, p_r$ (why?) and, hence, a member of the ideal $$(p_1)cap (p_2)capcdotscap(p_r)=(p_1p_2cdots p_r)quadtext{Why?}.$$



      Thanks for your patience!










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I did not understand the following proof, from time to time the questions will be inserted at the critical point.



      In the ring $mathbb{Z}$, let us show that if $n=p_1^{k_1}p_2^{k_2}cdots p_r^{k_r}$ is a factorization of the positive integer $nne 1$ into distinct primes $p_j$, then $$sqrt(n)=(p_1cdots p_r).$$



      Indeed, if the integer $a=p_1cdots p_r$ and $k=max{k_1,k_2dots,k_r}$, then we have $a^kin (n)$ (Why?); this makes clear that $(p_1p_2cdots p_r)subseteq sqrt (n)$ (Why?).



      On the other hand, if some positive integral power of the integer $m$ is divisible by $n$ (that is, if $minsqrt (n)$), then $m$ itself must be divisible by each of the primes $p_1, p_2,dots, p_r$ (why?) and, hence, a member of the ideal $$(p_1)cap (p_2)capcdotscap(p_r)=(p_1p_2cdots p_r)quadtext{Why?}.$$



      Thanks for your patience!







      abstract-algebra proof-explanation






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 3 '18 at 16:25









      Jack J.Jack J.

      4701419




      4701419






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Remember the definition of $$sqrt{(n)}:={rin Bbb Z : r^sin (n), sin Bbb Z (squad text{varies with}quad r}.$$To show that $(p_1p_2cdots p_r)subseteq sqrt{(n)}$ you can prove that $p_1p_2cdots p_rin sqrt{(n)}$ and this follows by definition of $sqrt{(n)}$. On the other hand, if $min sqrt {(n)}$ then exist $sin Bbb Z$ such that $m^sin (n)$. This implies that $n | m$ , $p_1 |m cdots p_r | m$ and therefore $min (p_1)capcdotscap (p_r)$. I believe that you can prove the last “small proposition”.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024297%2fnil-radical-of-n-in-mathbbz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            Remember the definition of $$sqrt{(n)}:={rin Bbb Z : r^sin (n), sin Bbb Z (squad text{varies with}quad r}.$$To show that $(p_1p_2cdots p_r)subseteq sqrt{(n)}$ you can prove that $p_1p_2cdots p_rin sqrt{(n)}$ and this follows by definition of $sqrt{(n)}$. On the other hand, if $min sqrt {(n)}$ then exist $sin Bbb Z$ such that $m^sin (n)$. This implies that $n | m$ , $p_1 |m cdots p_r | m$ and therefore $min (p_1)capcdotscap (p_r)$. I believe that you can prove the last “small proposition”.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              Remember the definition of $$sqrt{(n)}:={rin Bbb Z : r^sin (n), sin Bbb Z (squad text{varies with}quad r}.$$To show that $(p_1p_2cdots p_r)subseteq sqrt{(n)}$ you can prove that $p_1p_2cdots p_rin sqrt{(n)}$ and this follows by definition of $sqrt{(n)}$. On the other hand, if $min sqrt {(n)}$ then exist $sin Bbb Z$ such that $m^sin (n)$. This implies that $n | m$ , $p_1 |m cdots p_r | m$ and therefore $min (p_1)capcdotscap (p_r)$. I believe that you can prove the last “small proposition”.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                Remember the definition of $$sqrt{(n)}:={rin Bbb Z : r^sin (n), sin Bbb Z (squad text{varies with}quad r}.$$To show that $(p_1p_2cdots p_r)subseteq sqrt{(n)}$ you can prove that $p_1p_2cdots p_rin sqrt{(n)}$ and this follows by definition of $sqrt{(n)}$. On the other hand, if $min sqrt {(n)}$ then exist $sin Bbb Z$ such that $m^sin (n)$. This implies that $n | m$ , $p_1 |m cdots p_r | m$ and therefore $min (p_1)capcdotscap (p_r)$. I believe that you can prove the last “small proposition”.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Remember the definition of $$sqrt{(n)}:={rin Bbb Z : r^sin (n), sin Bbb Z (squad text{varies with}quad r}.$$To show that $(p_1p_2cdots p_r)subseteq sqrt{(n)}$ you can prove that $p_1p_2cdots p_rin sqrt{(n)}$ and this follows by definition of $sqrt{(n)}$. On the other hand, if $min sqrt {(n)}$ then exist $sin Bbb Z$ such that $m^sin (n)$. This implies that $n | m$ , $p_1 |m cdots p_r | m$ and therefore $min (p_1)capcdotscap (p_r)$. I believe that you can prove the last “small proposition”.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 3 '18 at 20:08









                Domenico VuonoDomenico Vuono

                2,3161523




                2,3161523






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024297%2fnil-radical-of-n-in-mathbbz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Index of /

                    Tribalistas

                    Listed building