$sup_K |partial^{alpha}u|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s$ then $u$ is analytic for $sle 1$
A function $uin C^{infty}$ belongs to the Gevrey Class of order $s$ if for every compact $K$ of $Omega$ there is a constant $C$ such that
$$sup_K |partial^{alpha}u|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s$$
$$alphainmathbb{Z}_+^N$$
I've found this thing $u$ harmonic then $|D^{alpha} u(x_0)|le frac{C_k}{r^{n+k}}||u||$ or $sup_{xin B}|partial^{alpha} f(x)|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!$ which is close but has no $s$. It's known that for $s=1$ (Evans) such functions are analytic, but I don't know how to prove it for $s <1$.
It looks like that for $s>1$ I can simply insert $C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s$ in the end of the inequality like this:
$$sup_{xin B}|partial^{alpha} f(x)|le
C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s$$
so for $s>1$ every funtion that satisfies this is analytic?
UPDATE:
I have from $u$ harmonic then $|D^{alpha} u(x_0)|le frac{C_k}{r^{n+k}}||u||$ or $sup_{xin B}|partial^{alpha} f(x)|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!$ that for any ball that:
Given any closed ball $BsubsetOmega$, there exists $C>0$ such that
$$sup_{xin B}|partial^{alpha} f(x)|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!$$
and
$f$ is real analytic in $Omega$
are equivalent statements. Therefore, if we pick a function $u$ from the Gevrey class, it is true that
$$sup_{overline{B}} |partial^{alpha}u|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s $$
if we pick ${overline{B}}$ as our compact $K$
therefore
$$sup_{overline{B}} |partial^{alpha}u|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha! $$
for $0<s<1$. Therefore, by our theorem, it is true that $u$ is real analytic in $Omega$
is it true?
real-analysis pde supremum-and-infimum wave-equation
add a comment |
A function $uin C^{infty}$ belongs to the Gevrey Class of order $s$ if for every compact $K$ of $Omega$ there is a constant $C$ such that
$$sup_K |partial^{alpha}u|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s$$
$$alphainmathbb{Z}_+^N$$
I've found this thing $u$ harmonic then $|D^{alpha} u(x_0)|le frac{C_k}{r^{n+k}}||u||$ or $sup_{xin B}|partial^{alpha} f(x)|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!$ which is close but has no $s$. It's known that for $s=1$ (Evans) such functions are analytic, but I don't know how to prove it for $s <1$.
It looks like that for $s>1$ I can simply insert $C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s$ in the end of the inequality like this:
$$sup_{xin B}|partial^{alpha} f(x)|le
C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s$$
so for $s>1$ every funtion that satisfies this is analytic?
UPDATE:
I have from $u$ harmonic then $|D^{alpha} u(x_0)|le frac{C_k}{r^{n+k}}||u||$ or $sup_{xin B}|partial^{alpha} f(x)|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!$ that for any ball that:
Given any closed ball $BsubsetOmega$, there exists $C>0$ such that
$$sup_{xin B}|partial^{alpha} f(x)|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!$$
and
$f$ is real analytic in $Omega$
are equivalent statements. Therefore, if we pick a function $u$ from the Gevrey class, it is true that
$$sup_{overline{B}} |partial^{alpha}u|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s $$
if we pick ${overline{B}}$ as our compact $K$
therefore
$$sup_{overline{B}} |partial^{alpha}u|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha! $$
for $0<s<1$. Therefore, by our theorem, it is true that $u$ is real analytic in $Omega$
is it true?
real-analysis pde supremum-and-infimum wave-equation
May you seek about a compact for which every sequence u(n) converge to 0 by the means of distribution Topology D(R)
– zeraoulia rafik
Nov 26 at 17:39
@zeraouliarafik unfortunately I don't think distribution topology is a way here because I have any background on this
– Lucas Zanella
Nov 26 at 18:25
Since you have posted PDE in your tag , and all your given data indicate the uses of distribution partically the convergence to the null function in the the Topology of distribution
– zeraoulia rafik
Nov 26 at 18:30
Your last argument seems good to me. See the third characterization in en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
– Federico
Nov 29 at 18:08
add a comment |
A function $uin C^{infty}$ belongs to the Gevrey Class of order $s$ if for every compact $K$ of $Omega$ there is a constant $C$ such that
$$sup_K |partial^{alpha}u|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s$$
$$alphainmathbb{Z}_+^N$$
I've found this thing $u$ harmonic then $|D^{alpha} u(x_0)|le frac{C_k}{r^{n+k}}||u||$ or $sup_{xin B}|partial^{alpha} f(x)|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!$ which is close but has no $s$. It's known that for $s=1$ (Evans) such functions are analytic, but I don't know how to prove it for $s <1$.
It looks like that for $s>1$ I can simply insert $C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s$ in the end of the inequality like this:
$$sup_{xin B}|partial^{alpha} f(x)|le
C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s$$
so for $s>1$ every funtion that satisfies this is analytic?
UPDATE:
I have from $u$ harmonic then $|D^{alpha} u(x_0)|le frac{C_k}{r^{n+k}}||u||$ or $sup_{xin B}|partial^{alpha} f(x)|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!$ that for any ball that:
Given any closed ball $BsubsetOmega$, there exists $C>0$ such that
$$sup_{xin B}|partial^{alpha} f(x)|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!$$
and
$f$ is real analytic in $Omega$
are equivalent statements. Therefore, if we pick a function $u$ from the Gevrey class, it is true that
$$sup_{overline{B}} |partial^{alpha}u|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s $$
if we pick ${overline{B}}$ as our compact $K$
therefore
$$sup_{overline{B}} |partial^{alpha}u|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha! $$
for $0<s<1$. Therefore, by our theorem, it is true that $u$ is real analytic in $Omega$
is it true?
real-analysis pde supremum-and-infimum wave-equation
A function $uin C^{infty}$ belongs to the Gevrey Class of order $s$ if for every compact $K$ of $Omega$ there is a constant $C$ such that
$$sup_K |partial^{alpha}u|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s$$
$$alphainmathbb{Z}_+^N$$
I've found this thing $u$ harmonic then $|D^{alpha} u(x_0)|le frac{C_k}{r^{n+k}}||u||$ or $sup_{xin B}|partial^{alpha} f(x)|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!$ which is close but has no $s$. It's known that for $s=1$ (Evans) such functions are analytic, but I don't know how to prove it for $s <1$.
It looks like that for $s>1$ I can simply insert $C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s$ in the end of the inequality like this:
$$sup_{xin B}|partial^{alpha} f(x)|le
C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s$$
so for $s>1$ every funtion that satisfies this is analytic?
UPDATE:
I have from $u$ harmonic then $|D^{alpha} u(x_0)|le frac{C_k}{r^{n+k}}||u||$ or $sup_{xin B}|partial^{alpha} f(x)|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!$ that for any ball that:
Given any closed ball $BsubsetOmega$, there exists $C>0$ such that
$$sup_{xin B}|partial^{alpha} f(x)|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!$$
and
$f$ is real analytic in $Omega$
are equivalent statements. Therefore, if we pick a function $u$ from the Gevrey class, it is true that
$$sup_{overline{B}} |partial^{alpha}u|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s $$
if we pick ${overline{B}}$ as our compact $K$
therefore
$$sup_{overline{B}} |partial^{alpha}u|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha! $$
for $0<s<1$. Therefore, by our theorem, it is true that $u$ is real analytic in $Omega$
is it true?
real-analysis pde supremum-and-infimum wave-equation
real-analysis pde supremum-and-infimum wave-equation
edited Nov 27 at 17:08
asked Nov 26 at 17:07
Lucas Zanella
93111330
93111330
May you seek about a compact for which every sequence u(n) converge to 0 by the means of distribution Topology D(R)
– zeraoulia rafik
Nov 26 at 17:39
@zeraouliarafik unfortunately I don't think distribution topology is a way here because I have any background on this
– Lucas Zanella
Nov 26 at 18:25
Since you have posted PDE in your tag , and all your given data indicate the uses of distribution partically the convergence to the null function in the the Topology of distribution
– zeraoulia rafik
Nov 26 at 18:30
Your last argument seems good to me. See the third characterization in en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
– Federico
Nov 29 at 18:08
add a comment |
May you seek about a compact for which every sequence u(n) converge to 0 by the means of distribution Topology D(R)
– zeraoulia rafik
Nov 26 at 17:39
@zeraouliarafik unfortunately I don't think distribution topology is a way here because I have any background on this
– Lucas Zanella
Nov 26 at 18:25
Since you have posted PDE in your tag , and all your given data indicate the uses of distribution partically the convergence to the null function in the the Topology of distribution
– zeraoulia rafik
Nov 26 at 18:30
Your last argument seems good to me. See the third characterization in en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
– Federico
Nov 29 at 18:08
May you seek about a compact for which every sequence u(n) converge to 0 by the means of distribution Topology D(R)
– zeraoulia rafik
Nov 26 at 17:39
May you seek about a compact for which every sequence u(n) converge to 0 by the means of distribution Topology D(R)
– zeraoulia rafik
Nov 26 at 17:39
@zeraouliarafik unfortunately I don't think distribution topology is a way here because I have any background on this
– Lucas Zanella
Nov 26 at 18:25
@zeraouliarafik unfortunately I don't think distribution topology is a way here because I have any background on this
– Lucas Zanella
Nov 26 at 18:25
Since you have posted PDE in your tag , and all your given data indicate the uses of distribution partically the convergence to the null function in the the Topology of distribution
– zeraoulia rafik
Nov 26 at 18:30
Since you have posted PDE in your tag , and all your given data indicate the uses of distribution partically the convergence to the null function in the the Topology of distribution
– zeraoulia rafik
Nov 26 at 18:30
Your last argument seems good to me. See the third characterization in en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
– Federico
Nov 29 at 18:08
Your last argument seems good to me. See the third characterization in en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
– Federico
Nov 29 at 18:08
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You are right for $s<1$, these functions are analytic. In fact, such a $u$ is entire. Expanding $u$ at any point $x_0$ where it is originally defined, we have the Taylor series
$u(x) = sum_{n=0}^infty frac {u^{(n)}(x_0)}{n!} (x-x_0)^n$.
The radius of convergence $R$ of this series satisfies
$$ frac1R = limsup_{ntoinfty} sqrt[n]{frac {u^{(n)}(x_0)}{n!}}le lim_{ntoinfty} Csqrt[n]{frac {1}{(n!)^{1-s}}} = 0,$$
since $n!sim sqrt{2pi n} (n/e)^n$. So the series converges on $mathbb R,$ and defines an analytic extension past $K$.
Bur for $s>1$, you cannot get the chain of inequalities
$$ sup_{xin B}|partial^{alpha} f(x)|le
C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s$$
starting from
$$ sup_{xin B}|partial^{alpha} f(x)| le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s.$$
It is the other way, an analytic function(i.e. $s=1$) is also Gevrey class of order $s>1$. The Gevrey class for $s>1$ contains non-analytic functions: for instance $exp(-1/x)mathbb1_{x>0}$ is Gevrey but not analytic, see my computation in Bounding the extrema of polynomials from $frac{d^n}{dx^n} exp(-1/x)$.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014603%2fsup-k-partial-alphau-le-c-alpha1-alphas-then-u-is-analytic-fo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You are right for $s<1$, these functions are analytic. In fact, such a $u$ is entire. Expanding $u$ at any point $x_0$ where it is originally defined, we have the Taylor series
$u(x) = sum_{n=0}^infty frac {u^{(n)}(x_0)}{n!} (x-x_0)^n$.
The radius of convergence $R$ of this series satisfies
$$ frac1R = limsup_{ntoinfty} sqrt[n]{frac {u^{(n)}(x_0)}{n!}}le lim_{ntoinfty} Csqrt[n]{frac {1}{(n!)^{1-s}}} = 0,$$
since $n!sim sqrt{2pi n} (n/e)^n$. So the series converges on $mathbb R,$ and defines an analytic extension past $K$.
Bur for $s>1$, you cannot get the chain of inequalities
$$ sup_{xin B}|partial^{alpha} f(x)|le
C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s$$
starting from
$$ sup_{xin B}|partial^{alpha} f(x)| le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s.$$
It is the other way, an analytic function(i.e. $s=1$) is also Gevrey class of order $s>1$. The Gevrey class for $s>1$ contains non-analytic functions: for instance $exp(-1/x)mathbb1_{x>0}$ is Gevrey but not analytic, see my computation in Bounding the extrema of polynomials from $frac{d^n}{dx^n} exp(-1/x)$.
add a comment |
You are right for $s<1$, these functions are analytic. In fact, such a $u$ is entire. Expanding $u$ at any point $x_0$ where it is originally defined, we have the Taylor series
$u(x) = sum_{n=0}^infty frac {u^{(n)}(x_0)}{n!} (x-x_0)^n$.
The radius of convergence $R$ of this series satisfies
$$ frac1R = limsup_{ntoinfty} sqrt[n]{frac {u^{(n)}(x_0)}{n!}}le lim_{ntoinfty} Csqrt[n]{frac {1}{(n!)^{1-s}}} = 0,$$
since $n!sim sqrt{2pi n} (n/e)^n$. So the series converges on $mathbb R,$ and defines an analytic extension past $K$.
Bur for $s>1$, you cannot get the chain of inequalities
$$ sup_{xin B}|partial^{alpha} f(x)|le
C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s$$
starting from
$$ sup_{xin B}|partial^{alpha} f(x)| le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s.$$
It is the other way, an analytic function(i.e. $s=1$) is also Gevrey class of order $s>1$. The Gevrey class for $s>1$ contains non-analytic functions: for instance $exp(-1/x)mathbb1_{x>0}$ is Gevrey but not analytic, see my computation in Bounding the extrema of polynomials from $frac{d^n}{dx^n} exp(-1/x)$.
add a comment |
You are right for $s<1$, these functions are analytic. In fact, such a $u$ is entire. Expanding $u$ at any point $x_0$ where it is originally defined, we have the Taylor series
$u(x) = sum_{n=0}^infty frac {u^{(n)}(x_0)}{n!} (x-x_0)^n$.
The radius of convergence $R$ of this series satisfies
$$ frac1R = limsup_{ntoinfty} sqrt[n]{frac {u^{(n)}(x_0)}{n!}}le lim_{ntoinfty} Csqrt[n]{frac {1}{(n!)^{1-s}}} = 0,$$
since $n!sim sqrt{2pi n} (n/e)^n$. So the series converges on $mathbb R,$ and defines an analytic extension past $K$.
Bur for $s>1$, you cannot get the chain of inequalities
$$ sup_{xin B}|partial^{alpha} f(x)|le
C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s$$
starting from
$$ sup_{xin B}|partial^{alpha} f(x)| le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s.$$
It is the other way, an analytic function(i.e. $s=1$) is also Gevrey class of order $s>1$. The Gevrey class for $s>1$ contains non-analytic functions: for instance $exp(-1/x)mathbb1_{x>0}$ is Gevrey but not analytic, see my computation in Bounding the extrema of polynomials from $frac{d^n}{dx^n} exp(-1/x)$.
You are right for $s<1$, these functions are analytic. In fact, such a $u$ is entire. Expanding $u$ at any point $x_0$ where it is originally defined, we have the Taylor series
$u(x) = sum_{n=0}^infty frac {u^{(n)}(x_0)}{n!} (x-x_0)^n$.
The radius of convergence $R$ of this series satisfies
$$ frac1R = limsup_{ntoinfty} sqrt[n]{frac {u^{(n)}(x_0)}{n!}}le lim_{ntoinfty} Csqrt[n]{frac {1}{(n!)^{1-s}}} = 0,$$
since $n!sim sqrt{2pi n} (n/e)^n$. So the series converges on $mathbb R,$ and defines an analytic extension past $K$.
Bur for $s>1$, you cannot get the chain of inequalities
$$ sup_{xin B}|partial^{alpha} f(x)|le
C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s$$
starting from
$$ sup_{xin B}|partial^{alpha} f(x)| le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s.$$
It is the other way, an analytic function(i.e. $s=1$) is also Gevrey class of order $s>1$. The Gevrey class for $s>1$ contains non-analytic functions: for instance $exp(-1/x)mathbb1_{x>0}$ is Gevrey but not analytic, see my computation in Bounding the extrema of polynomials from $frac{d^n}{dx^n} exp(-1/x)$.
edited Dec 3 at 23:30
answered Dec 1 at 18:01
Calvin Khor
11.2k21438
11.2k21438
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014603%2fsup-k-partial-alphau-le-c-alpha1-alphas-then-u-is-analytic-fo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
May you seek about a compact for which every sequence u(n) converge to 0 by the means of distribution Topology D(R)
– zeraoulia rafik
Nov 26 at 17:39
@zeraouliarafik unfortunately I don't think distribution topology is a way here because I have any background on this
– Lucas Zanella
Nov 26 at 18:25
Since you have posted PDE in your tag , and all your given data indicate the uses of distribution partically the convergence to the null function in the the Topology of distribution
– zeraoulia rafik
Nov 26 at 18:30
Your last argument seems good to me. See the third characterization in en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
– Federico
Nov 29 at 18:08