Integral absolute value proof












0












$begingroup$


Can anyone prove this? I can understand this intuitively, but can't prove it mathematically. Please help me.



$$
left|int_a^b f(x),dx,right| le int_a^b lvert f(x)rvert ,dx
$$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Hint: $-|f(x)|le f(x)le |f(x)|$. But, please, add your thoughts about the problem. This is a main fact about integrals and you should have it in your textbook.
    $endgroup$
    – egreg
    Dec 8 '18 at 12:04








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Is the claim even true? Consider $f(x)=1$, $a=1$, $b=0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Dec 8 '18 at 12:06










  • $begingroup$
    @ egreg Thank you. Actually, my textbook put the same hint but I can't understand how to use it... Whenever I solve questions about this(calculating area) I always regard RHS same or bigger than LHS true as RHS means raising the graph to 1 or 2 quadrants and calculating the area.
    $endgroup$
    – Sarah Shin
    Dec 8 '18 at 12:13












  • $begingroup$
    Hi Sarah, see the application of Egreg's hint ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Wesley Strik
    Dec 8 '18 at 13:33
















0












$begingroup$


Can anyone prove this? I can understand this intuitively, but can't prove it mathematically. Please help me.



$$
left|int_a^b f(x),dx,right| le int_a^b lvert f(x)rvert ,dx
$$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Hint: $-|f(x)|le f(x)le |f(x)|$. But, please, add your thoughts about the problem. This is a main fact about integrals and you should have it in your textbook.
    $endgroup$
    – egreg
    Dec 8 '18 at 12:04








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Is the claim even true? Consider $f(x)=1$, $a=1$, $b=0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Dec 8 '18 at 12:06










  • $begingroup$
    @ egreg Thank you. Actually, my textbook put the same hint but I can't understand how to use it... Whenever I solve questions about this(calculating area) I always regard RHS same or bigger than LHS true as RHS means raising the graph to 1 or 2 quadrants and calculating the area.
    $endgroup$
    – Sarah Shin
    Dec 8 '18 at 12:13












  • $begingroup$
    Hi Sarah, see the application of Egreg's hint ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Wesley Strik
    Dec 8 '18 at 13:33














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Can anyone prove this? I can understand this intuitively, but can't prove it mathematically. Please help me.



$$
left|int_a^b f(x),dx,right| le int_a^b lvert f(x)rvert ,dx
$$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Can anyone prove this? I can understand this intuitively, but can't prove it mathematically. Please help me.



$$
left|int_a^b f(x),dx,right| le int_a^b lvert f(x)rvert ,dx
$$







integration absolute-value






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 8 '18 at 12:03









egreg

181k1485203




181k1485203










asked Dec 8 '18 at 12:00









Sarah Shin Sarah Shin

11




11








  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Hint: $-|f(x)|le f(x)le |f(x)|$. But, please, add your thoughts about the problem. This is a main fact about integrals and you should have it in your textbook.
    $endgroup$
    – egreg
    Dec 8 '18 at 12:04








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Is the claim even true? Consider $f(x)=1$, $a=1$, $b=0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Dec 8 '18 at 12:06










  • $begingroup$
    @ egreg Thank you. Actually, my textbook put the same hint but I can't understand how to use it... Whenever I solve questions about this(calculating area) I always regard RHS same or bigger than LHS true as RHS means raising the graph to 1 or 2 quadrants and calculating the area.
    $endgroup$
    – Sarah Shin
    Dec 8 '18 at 12:13












  • $begingroup$
    Hi Sarah, see the application of Egreg's hint ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Wesley Strik
    Dec 8 '18 at 13:33














  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Hint: $-|f(x)|le f(x)le |f(x)|$. But, please, add your thoughts about the problem. This is a main fact about integrals and you should have it in your textbook.
    $endgroup$
    – egreg
    Dec 8 '18 at 12:04








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Is the claim even true? Consider $f(x)=1$, $a=1$, $b=0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Dec 8 '18 at 12:06










  • $begingroup$
    @ egreg Thank you. Actually, my textbook put the same hint but I can't understand how to use it... Whenever I solve questions about this(calculating area) I always regard RHS same or bigger than LHS true as RHS means raising the graph to 1 or 2 quadrants and calculating the area.
    $endgroup$
    – Sarah Shin
    Dec 8 '18 at 12:13












  • $begingroup$
    Hi Sarah, see the application of Egreg's hint ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Wesley Strik
    Dec 8 '18 at 13:33








6




6




$begingroup$
Hint: $-|f(x)|le f(x)le |f(x)|$. But, please, add your thoughts about the problem. This is a main fact about integrals and you should have it in your textbook.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Dec 8 '18 at 12:04






$begingroup$
Hint: $-|f(x)|le f(x)le |f(x)|$. But, please, add your thoughts about the problem. This is a main fact about integrals and you should have it in your textbook.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Dec 8 '18 at 12:04






2




2




$begingroup$
Is the claim even true? Consider $f(x)=1$, $a=1$, $b=0$.
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Dec 8 '18 at 12:06




$begingroup$
Is the claim even true? Consider $f(x)=1$, $a=1$, $b=0$.
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Dec 8 '18 at 12:06












$begingroup$
@ egreg Thank you. Actually, my textbook put the same hint but I can't understand how to use it... Whenever I solve questions about this(calculating area) I always regard RHS same or bigger than LHS true as RHS means raising the graph to 1 or 2 quadrants and calculating the area.
$endgroup$
– Sarah Shin
Dec 8 '18 at 12:13






$begingroup$
@ egreg Thank you. Actually, my textbook put the same hint but I can't understand how to use it... Whenever I solve questions about this(calculating area) I always regard RHS same or bigger than LHS true as RHS means raising the graph to 1 or 2 quadrants and calculating the area.
$endgroup$
– Sarah Shin
Dec 8 '18 at 12:13














$begingroup$
Hi Sarah, see the application of Egreg's hint ;)
$endgroup$
– Wesley Strik
Dec 8 '18 at 13:33




$begingroup$
Hi Sarah, see the application of Egreg's hint ;)
$endgroup$
– Wesley Strik
Dec 8 '18 at 13:33










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Hint: a) If $f$ is a step function, then the inequality follows very easily. b) If $f$ is a regulated function (or a continuous function), use the fact that you can approximate $f$ w.r.t. $| cdot |_infty$ by a sequence ${f_n}$ of step functions. Now use part a).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    Using the hint from the comments sections we can provide a nice proof.



    If we assume $f$ is a Riemann-integrable function, this inequality is true, we will provide a proof.



    Proof



    By properties of absolute value, we get
    $$-|f(x)|le f(x)le |f(x)|.$$
    Since $f$ is continuous, we know that $|f|$ is also continuous, hence $|f|$ is Riemann integrable. We can integrate each side of this inequality and we get
    $$-int_a^b |f(x)|dxle int_a^bf(x)dxle int_a^b|f(x)|dx$$
    This instantly gives us that:
    $$left| int_a^b f(x)dxright|le int_a^b|f(x)|dx. $$ $square$



    Alternatively, you are considering a continuous version of the triangle inequality. The very definition of an integral is the limit of discrete sums of (Riemann) intervals. To properly prove this from the definition we must go back to the definition of integration:
    For any Riemann sum we get from the usual triangle inequality for the absolute value:



    $$left|sum_{k=1}^nf(c_i)(x_i-x_{i-1})right|leqsum_{k=1}^n|f(c_i)|(x_i-x_{i-1}),,,,$$



    $${a=x_0<x_1<...<x_n=b},,,,,c_iin[x_{i-1},x_1]$$



    Pass now to the limit $,ntoinfty,$ while the maximal length of the subintervals goes to zero (this is what is done to get the Riemann integral from Riemann sums). With courtesy of: The triangle inequality for integrals






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031025%2fintegral-absolute-value-proof%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1












      $begingroup$

      Hint: a) If $f$ is a step function, then the inequality follows very easily. b) If $f$ is a regulated function (or a continuous function), use the fact that you can approximate $f$ w.r.t. $| cdot |_infty$ by a sequence ${f_n}$ of step functions. Now use part a).






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        1












        $begingroup$

        Hint: a) If $f$ is a step function, then the inequality follows very easily. b) If $f$ is a regulated function (or a continuous function), use the fact that you can approximate $f$ w.r.t. $| cdot |_infty$ by a sequence ${f_n}$ of step functions. Now use part a).






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          Hint: a) If $f$ is a step function, then the inequality follows very easily. b) If $f$ is a regulated function (or a continuous function), use the fact that you can approximate $f$ w.r.t. $| cdot |_infty$ by a sequence ${f_n}$ of step functions. Now use part a).






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Hint: a) If $f$ is a step function, then the inequality follows very easily. b) If $f$ is a regulated function (or a continuous function), use the fact that you can approximate $f$ w.r.t. $| cdot |_infty$ by a sequence ${f_n}$ of step functions. Now use part a).







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 8 '18 at 12:11









          NiklasNiklas

          2,203720




          2,203720























              0












              $begingroup$

              Using the hint from the comments sections we can provide a nice proof.



              If we assume $f$ is a Riemann-integrable function, this inequality is true, we will provide a proof.



              Proof



              By properties of absolute value, we get
              $$-|f(x)|le f(x)le |f(x)|.$$
              Since $f$ is continuous, we know that $|f|$ is also continuous, hence $|f|$ is Riemann integrable. We can integrate each side of this inequality and we get
              $$-int_a^b |f(x)|dxle int_a^bf(x)dxle int_a^b|f(x)|dx$$
              This instantly gives us that:
              $$left| int_a^b f(x)dxright|le int_a^b|f(x)|dx. $$ $square$



              Alternatively, you are considering a continuous version of the triangle inequality. The very definition of an integral is the limit of discrete sums of (Riemann) intervals. To properly prove this from the definition we must go back to the definition of integration:
              For any Riemann sum we get from the usual triangle inequality for the absolute value:



              $$left|sum_{k=1}^nf(c_i)(x_i-x_{i-1})right|leqsum_{k=1}^n|f(c_i)|(x_i-x_{i-1}),,,,$$



              $${a=x_0<x_1<...<x_n=b},,,,,c_iin[x_{i-1},x_1]$$



              Pass now to the limit $,ntoinfty,$ while the maximal length of the subintervals goes to zero (this is what is done to get the Riemann integral from Riemann sums). With courtesy of: The triangle inequality for integrals






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$

                Using the hint from the comments sections we can provide a nice proof.



                If we assume $f$ is a Riemann-integrable function, this inequality is true, we will provide a proof.



                Proof



                By properties of absolute value, we get
                $$-|f(x)|le f(x)le |f(x)|.$$
                Since $f$ is continuous, we know that $|f|$ is also continuous, hence $|f|$ is Riemann integrable. We can integrate each side of this inequality and we get
                $$-int_a^b |f(x)|dxle int_a^bf(x)dxle int_a^b|f(x)|dx$$
                This instantly gives us that:
                $$left| int_a^b f(x)dxright|le int_a^b|f(x)|dx. $$ $square$



                Alternatively, you are considering a continuous version of the triangle inequality. The very definition of an integral is the limit of discrete sums of (Riemann) intervals. To properly prove this from the definition we must go back to the definition of integration:
                For any Riemann sum we get from the usual triangle inequality for the absolute value:



                $$left|sum_{k=1}^nf(c_i)(x_i-x_{i-1})right|leqsum_{k=1}^n|f(c_i)|(x_i-x_{i-1}),,,,$$



                $${a=x_0<x_1<...<x_n=b},,,,,c_iin[x_{i-1},x_1]$$



                Pass now to the limit $,ntoinfty,$ while the maximal length of the subintervals goes to zero (this is what is done to get the Riemann integral from Riemann sums). With courtesy of: The triangle inequality for integrals






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  Using the hint from the comments sections we can provide a nice proof.



                  If we assume $f$ is a Riemann-integrable function, this inequality is true, we will provide a proof.



                  Proof



                  By properties of absolute value, we get
                  $$-|f(x)|le f(x)le |f(x)|.$$
                  Since $f$ is continuous, we know that $|f|$ is also continuous, hence $|f|$ is Riemann integrable. We can integrate each side of this inequality and we get
                  $$-int_a^b |f(x)|dxle int_a^bf(x)dxle int_a^b|f(x)|dx$$
                  This instantly gives us that:
                  $$left| int_a^b f(x)dxright|le int_a^b|f(x)|dx. $$ $square$



                  Alternatively, you are considering a continuous version of the triangle inequality. The very definition of an integral is the limit of discrete sums of (Riemann) intervals. To properly prove this from the definition we must go back to the definition of integration:
                  For any Riemann sum we get from the usual triangle inequality for the absolute value:



                  $$left|sum_{k=1}^nf(c_i)(x_i-x_{i-1})right|leqsum_{k=1}^n|f(c_i)|(x_i-x_{i-1}),,,,$$



                  $${a=x_0<x_1<...<x_n=b},,,,,c_iin[x_{i-1},x_1]$$



                  Pass now to the limit $,ntoinfty,$ while the maximal length of the subintervals goes to zero (this is what is done to get the Riemann integral from Riemann sums). With courtesy of: The triangle inequality for integrals






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  Using the hint from the comments sections we can provide a nice proof.



                  If we assume $f$ is a Riemann-integrable function, this inequality is true, we will provide a proof.



                  Proof



                  By properties of absolute value, we get
                  $$-|f(x)|le f(x)le |f(x)|.$$
                  Since $f$ is continuous, we know that $|f|$ is also continuous, hence $|f|$ is Riemann integrable. We can integrate each side of this inequality and we get
                  $$-int_a^b |f(x)|dxle int_a^bf(x)dxle int_a^b|f(x)|dx$$
                  This instantly gives us that:
                  $$left| int_a^b f(x)dxright|le int_a^b|f(x)|dx. $$ $square$



                  Alternatively, you are considering a continuous version of the triangle inequality. The very definition of an integral is the limit of discrete sums of (Riemann) intervals. To properly prove this from the definition we must go back to the definition of integration:
                  For any Riemann sum we get from the usual triangle inequality for the absolute value:



                  $$left|sum_{k=1}^nf(c_i)(x_i-x_{i-1})right|leqsum_{k=1}^n|f(c_i)|(x_i-x_{i-1}),,,,$$



                  $${a=x_0<x_1<...<x_n=b},,,,,c_iin[x_{i-1},x_1]$$



                  Pass now to the limit $,ntoinfty,$ while the maximal length of the subintervals goes to zero (this is what is done to get the Riemann integral from Riemann sums). With courtesy of: The triangle inequality for integrals







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Dec 8 '18 at 13:49

























                  answered Dec 8 '18 at 12:07









                  Wesley StrikWesley Strik

                  1,761423




                  1,761423






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031025%2fintegral-absolute-value-proof%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

                      Aardman Animations

                      Are they similar matrix