Creating an indicator function in a neural network
$begingroup$
I am working on implementing the loss function of the Yolo version 2 object detection network and building from the construction notebook in the Wolfram Neural Network repository Yolo Version 2 so I can train it for a specialised detection task. The loss function is quite complicated, I can see how to implement almost all of it but I'm stuck with an indicator function implementation.
During training indicator functions are used to set the maximum value in a tensor to 1 and other values to zero (in the Yolo network it is an higher rank tensor) but the problem comes down to this, how to implement the following (a sort of indexmax
or argmax
function)
{1,2,1,4,2}
=> {0,0,0,1,0}
There are many ways of doing this with built-in functions but the problem I'm stuck with is how to do it with the functionality available in the neural network framework.
In the snippet below, the Position function is not available (that I can find) in the neural net framework.
vec = {1,2,1,4,2};
pos = Position[vec, Max[vec]]//Flatten (*this can't be directly implemented in the NN framework*)
UnitVectorLayer[5,"Input"-> "Integer"][pos]
This produces {0.,0.,0.,1.,0.} (*the output I'm after*)
In Keras there is an 'argmax' function that does something like this. Other functionality like ReplicateLayer
and related functions can then be used to construct the object needed, this bit isn't where the problem is.
Any ideas or suggestions on how to do this in the MMA neural network framework?
neural-networks
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am working on implementing the loss function of the Yolo version 2 object detection network and building from the construction notebook in the Wolfram Neural Network repository Yolo Version 2 so I can train it for a specialised detection task. The loss function is quite complicated, I can see how to implement almost all of it but I'm stuck with an indicator function implementation.
During training indicator functions are used to set the maximum value in a tensor to 1 and other values to zero (in the Yolo network it is an higher rank tensor) but the problem comes down to this, how to implement the following (a sort of indexmax
or argmax
function)
{1,2,1,4,2}
=> {0,0,0,1,0}
There are many ways of doing this with built-in functions but the problem I'm stuck with is how to do it with the functionality available in the neural network framework.
In the snippet below, the Position function is not available (that I can find) in the neural net framework.
vec = {1,2,1,4,2};
pos = Position[vec, Max[vec]]//Flatten (*this can't be directly implemented in the NN framework*)
UnitVectorLayer[5,"Input"-> "Integer"][pos]
This produces {0.,0.,0.,1.,0.} (*the output I'm after*)
In Keras there is an 'argmax' function that does something like this. Other functionality like ReplicateLayer
and related functions can then be used to construct the object needed, this bit isn't where the problem is.
Any ideas or suggestions on how to do this in the MMA neural network framework?
neural-networks
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am working on implementing the loss function of the Yolo version 2 object detection network and building from the construction notebook in the Wolfram Neural Network repository Yolo Version 2 so I can train it for a specialised detection task. The loss function is quite complicated, I can see how to implement almost all of it but I'm stuck with an indicator function implementation.
During training indicator functions are used to set the maximum value in a tensor to 1 and other values to zero (in the Yolo network it is an higher rank tensor) but the problem comes down to this, how to implement the following (a sort of indexmax
or argmax
function)
{1,2,1,4,2}
=> {0,0,0,1,0}
There are many ways of doing this with built-in functions but the problem I'm stuck with is how to do it with the functionality available in the neural network framework.
In the snippet below, the Position function is not available (that I can find) in the neural net framework.
vec = {1,2,1,4,2};
pos = Position[vec, Max[vec]]//Flatten (*this can't be directly implemented in the NN framework*)
UnitVectorLayer[5,"Input"-> "Integer"][pos]
This produces {0.,0.,0.,1.,0.} (*the output I'm after*)
In Keras there is an 'argmax' function that does something like this. Other functionality like ReplicateLayer
and related functions can then be used to construct the object needed, this bit isn't where the problem is.
Any ideas or suggestions on how to do this in the MMA neural network framework?
neural-networks
$endgroup$
I am working on implementing the loss function of the Yolo version 2 object detection network and building from the construction notebook in the Wolfram Neural Network repository Yolo Version 2 so I can train it for a specialised detection task. The loss function is quite complicated, I can see how to implement almost all of it but I'm stuck with an indicator function implementation.
During training indicator functions are used to set the maximum value in a tensor to 1 and other values to zero (in the Yolo network it is an higher rank tensor) but the problem comes down to this, how to implement the following (a sort of indexmax
or argmax
function)
{1,2,1,4,2}
=> {0,0,0,1,0}
There are many ways of doing this with built-in functions but the problem I'm stuck with is how to do it with the functionality available in the neural network framework.
In the snippet below, the Position function is not available (that I can find) in the neural net framework.
vec = {1,2,1,4,2};
pos = Position[vec, Max[vec]]//Flatten (*this can't be directly implemented in the NN framework*)
UnitVectorLayer[5,"Input"-> "Integer"][pos]
This produces {0.,0.,0.,1.,0.} (*the output I'm after*)
In Keras there is an 'argmax' function that does something like this. Other functionality like ReplicateLayer
and related functions can then be used to construct the object needed, this bit isn't where the problem is.
Any ideas or suggestions on how to do this in the MMA neural network framework?
neural-networks
neural-networks
asked Jan 13 at 13:12
EstabanWEstabanW
1155
1155
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You can construct an IndexMaxLayer using the existing layers, like so:
indexMaxLayer := NetGraph[{
"max" -> AggregationLayer[Max, 1],
"repl" -> ReplicateLayer[Automatic],
"switch" -> ThreadingLayer[If[#1 != #2, 0., 1.] &]
}, {
"max" -> "repl",
{NetPort@"Input", "repl"} -> "switch"
}]
indexMaxLayer[{1,2,1,4,2}]
> {0., 0., 0., 1., 0.}
This is getting the max
imum value in the input vector, repl
icating that value to be the same dimensions as the input vector, and then switch
ing the input layer to 0 or 1 if it does or doesn't match the max
value.
This is extendable to multiple dimensions if you change the second argument to AggregationLayer
, although there are multiple different behaviours you might want in that case (max per level or max over the entire matrix, for instance).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That's neat, thanks very much! I'd looked thoroughly through the documentation at the functions supported by ThreadingLayer, AggregationLayer etc and hadn't thought of experimenting with others (e.g. If) to see if they work.
$endgroup$
– EstabanW
Jan 13 at 14:59
$begingroup$
No problem! Please consider marking this answer as accepted if it solved your problem!
$endgroup$
– Carl Lange
Jan 13 at 16:49
$begingroup$
I'll leave it a day or so before accepting it
$endgroup$
– EstabanW
Jan 13 at 18:58
$begingroup$
Isn't there a way to compute thelen
from the input layer without having the user to explicitly supply it?
$endgroup$
– M.R.
Jan 14 at 15:30
$begingroup$
I don't know for sure! It certainly seems like it should be possible, since so many of the built-in layers have the ability to do this, but I didn't find anything that would calculate the dimensions for the ReplicateLayer.
$endgroup$
– Carl Lange
Jan 14 at 15:40
|
show 2 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "387"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f189407%2fcreating-an-indicator-function-in-a-neural-network%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You can construct an IndexMaxLayer using the existing layers, like so:
indexMaxLayer := NetGraph[{
"max" -> AggregationLayer[Max, 1],
"repl" -> ReplicateLayer[Automatic],
"switch" -> ThreadingLayer[If[#1 != #2, 0., 1.] &]
}, {
"max" -> "repl",
{NetPort@"Input", "repl"} -> "switch"
}]
indexMaxLayer[{1,2,1,4,2}]
> {0., 0., 0., 1., 0.}
This is getting the max
imum value in the input vector, repl
icating that value to be the same dimensions as the input vector, and then switch
ing the input layer to 0 or 1 if it does or doesn't match the max
value.
This is extendable to multiple dimensions if you change the second argument to AggregationLayer
, although there are multiple different behaviours you might want in that case (max per level or max over the entire matrix, for instance).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That's neat, thanks very much! I'd looked thoroughly through the documentation at the functions supported by ThreadingLayer, AggregationLayer etc and hadn't thought of experimenting with others (e.g. If) to see if they work.
$endgroup$
– EstabanW
Jan 13 at 14:59
$begingroup$
No problem! Please consider marking this answer as accepted if it solved your problem!
$endgroup$
– Carl Lange
Jan 13 at 16:49
$begingroup$
I'll leave it a day or so before accepting it
$endgroup$
– EstabanW
Jan 13 at 18:58
$begingroup$
Isn't there a way to compute thelen
from the input layer without having the user to explicitly supply it?
$endgroup$
– M.R.
Jan 14 at 15:30
$begingroup$
I don't know for sure! It certainly seems like it should be possible, since so many of the built-in layers have the ability to do this, but I didn't find anything that would calculate the dimensions for the ReplicateLayer.
$endgroup$
– Carl Lange
Jan 14 at 15:40
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
You can construct an IndexMaxLayer using the existing layers, like so:
indexMaxLayer := NetGraph[{
"max" -> AggregationLayer[Max, 1],
"repl" -> ReplicateLayer[Automatic],
"switch" -> ThreadingLayer[If[#1 != #2, 0., 1.] &]
}, {
"max" -> "repl",
{NetPort@"Input", "repl"} -> "switch"
}]
indexMaxLayer[{1,2,1,4,2}]
> {0., 0., 0., 1., 0.}
This is getting the max
imum value in the input vector, repl
icating that value to be the same dimensions as the input vector, and then switch
ing the input layer to 0 or 1 if it does or doesn't match the max
value.
This is extendable to multiple dimensions if you change the second argument to AggregationLayer
, although there are multiple different behaviours you might want in that case (max per level or max over the entire matrix, for instance).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That's neat, thanks very much! I'd looked thoroughly through the documentation at the functions supported by ThreadingLayer, AggregationLayer etc and hadn't thought of experimenting with others (e.g. If) to see if they work.
$endgroup$
– EstabanW
Jan 13 at 14:59
$begingroup$
No problem! Please consider marking this answer as accepted if it solved your problem!
$endgroup$
– Carl Lange
Jan 13 at 16:49
$begingroup$
I'll leave it a day or so before accepting it
$endgroup$
– EstabanW
Jan 13 at 18:58
$begingroup$
Isn't there a way to compute thelen
from the input layer without having the user to explicitly supply it?
$endgroup$
– M.R.
Jan 14 at 15:30
$begingroup$
I don't know for sure! It certainly seems like it should be possible, since so many of the built-in layers have the ability to do this, but I didn't find anything that would calculate the dimensions for the ReplicateLayer.
$endgroup$
– Carl Lange
Jan 14 at 15:40
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
You can construct an IndexMaxLayer using the existing layers, like so:
indexMaxLayer := NetGraph[{
"max" -> AggregationLayer[Max, 1],
"repl" -> ReplicateLayer[Automatic],
"switch" -> ThreadingLayer[If[#1 != #2, 0., 1.] &]
}, {
"max" -> "repl",
{NetPort@"Input", "repl"} -> "switch"
}]
indexMaxLayer[{1,2,1,4,2}]
> {0., 0., 0., 1., 0.}
This is getting the max
imum value in the input vector, repl
icating that value to be the same dimensions as the input vector, and then switch
ing the input layer to 0 or 1 if it does or doesn't match the max
value.
This is extendable to multiple dimensions if you change the second argument to AggregationLayer
, although there are multiple different behaviours you might want in that case (max per level or max over the entire matrix, for instance).
$endgroup$
You can construct an IndexMaxLayer using the existing layers, like so:
indexMaxLayer := NetGraph[{
"max" -> AggregationLayer[Max, 1],
"repl" -> ReplicateLayer[Automatic],
"switch" -> ThreadingLayer[If[#1 != #2, 0., 1.] &]
}, {
"max" -> "repl",
{NetPort@"Input", "repl"} -> "switch"
}]
indexMaxLayer[{1,2,1,4,2}]
> {0., 0., 0., 1., 0.}
This is getting the max
imum value in the input vector, repl
icating that value to be the same dimensions as the input vector, and then switch
ing the input layer to 0 or 1 if it does or doesn't match the max
value.
This is extendable to multiple dimensions if you change the second argument to AggregationLayer
, although there are multiple different behaviours you might want in that case (max per level or max over the entire matrix, for instance).
edited Jan 14 at 15:46
answered Jan 13 at 13:55
Carl LangeCarl Lange
3,5951731
3,5951731
$begingroup$
That's neat, thanks very much! I'd looked thoroughly through the documentation at the functions supported by ThreadingLayer, AggregationLayer etc and hadn't thought of experimenting with others (e.g. If) to see if they work.
$endgroup$
– EstabanW
Jan 13 at 14:59
$begingroup$
No problem! Please consider marking this answer as accepted if it solved your problem!
$endgroup$
– Carl Lange
Jan 13 at 16:49
$begingroup$
I'll leave it a day or so before accepting it
$endgroup$
– EstabanW
Jan 13 at 18:58
$begingroup$
Isn't there a way to compute thelen
from the input layer without having the user to explicitly supply it?
$endgroup$
– M.R.
Jan 14 at 15:30
$begingroup$
I don't know for sure! It certainly seems like it should be possible, since so many of the built-in layers have the ability to do this, but I didn't find anything that would calculate the dimensions for the ReplicateLayer.
$endgroup$
– Carl Lange
Jan 14 at 15:40
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
That's neat, thanks very much! I'd looked thoroughly through the documentation at the functions supported by ThreadingLayer, AggregationLayer etc and hadn't thought of experimenting with others (e.g. If) to see if they work.
$endgroup$
– EstabanW
Jan 13 at 14:59
$begingroup$
No problem! Please consider marking this answer as accepted if it solved your problem!
$endgroup$
– Carl Lange
Jan 13 at 16:49
$begingroup$
I'll leave it a day or so before accepting it
$endgroup$
– EstabanW
Jan 13 at 18:58
$begingroup$
Isn't there a way to compute thelen
from the input layer without having the user to explicitly supply it?
$endgroup$
– M.R.
Jan 14 at 15:30
$begingroup$
I don't know for sure! It certainly seems like it should be possible, since so many of the built-in layers have the ability to do this, but I didn't find anything that would calculate the dimensions for the ReplicateLayer.
$endgroup$
– Carl Lange
Jan 14 at 15:40
$begingroup$
That's neat, thanks very much! I'd looked thoroughly through the documentation at the functions supported by ThreadingLayer, AggregationLayer etc and hadn't thought of experimenting with others (e.g. If) to see if they work.
$endgroup$
– EstabanW
Jan 13 at 14:59
$begingroup$
That's neat, thanks very much! I'd looked thoroughly through the documentation at the functions supported by ThreadingLayer, AggregationLayer etc and hadn't thought of experimenting with others (e.g. If) to see if they work.
$endgroup$
– EstabanW
Jan 13 at 14:59
$begingroup$
No problem! Please consider marking this answer as accepted if it solved your problem!
$endgroup$
– Carl Lange
Jan 13 at 16:49
$begingroup$
No problem! Please consider marking this answer as accepted if it solved your problem!
$endgroup$
– Carl Lange
Jan 13 at 16:49
$begingroup$
I'll leave it a day or so before accepting it
$endgroup$
– EstabanW
Jan 13 at 18:58
$begingroup$
I'll leave it a day or so before accepting it
$endgroup$
– EstabanW
Jan 13 at 18:58
$begingroup$
Isn't there a way to compute the
len
from the input layer without having the user to explicitly supply it?$endgroup$
– M.R.
Jan 14 at 15:30
$begingroup$
Isn't there a way to compute the
len
from the input layer without having the user to explicitly supply it?$endgroup$
– M.R.
Jan 14 at 15:30
$begingroup$
I don't know for sure! It certainly seems like it should be possible, since so many of the built-in layers have the ability to do this, but I didn't find anything that would calculate the dimensions for the ReplicateLayer.
$endgroup$
– Carl Lange
Jan 14 at 15:40
$begingroup$
I don't know for sure! It certainly seems like it should be possible, since so many of the built-in layers have the ability to do this, but I didn't find anything that would calculate the dimensions for the ReplicateLayer.
$endgroup$
– Carl Lange
Jan 14 at 15:40
|
show 2 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f189407%2fcreating-an-indicator-function-in-a-neural-network%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown