Inner product of two vectors in complex vector space in index notation












2












$begingroup$


Suppose $vec{u}, vec{v} in left(V, mathbb{C}^{n}right)$: by construction
$$
begin{split}
vec{u} &= sum_{i=1}^{n}u_{i}vec{e}_{i}\
vec{v} &= sum_{i=1}^{n}v_{i}vec{e}_{i}
end{split}.
$$



The inner product of vectors $vec{u}$ and $vec{v}$ gives



$$
langle vec{u}, vec{v}rangle
= langle sum_{i=1}^{n}u_{i}vec{e}_{i}, sum_{i=1}^{n}v_{i}vec{e}_{i}rangle.
$$



But $langle vec{u}, vec{v}rangle = langle vec{v}, vec{u}rangle^{*}$ with $*$ being the complex conjugate, and recalling that $langle X,alpha Yrangle = alpha^{*} langle X,Yrangle$ for $alpha$ a complex scalar, this gives
$$
left(sum_{i,j=1}^{n}u_{i}^{*}v_{j}langle vec{e}_{j}, vec{e}_{i}rangle right)^{*}
=sum_{i,j=1}^{n}u_{i}v_{j}^{*}
langle vec{e}_{j}, vec{e}_{i} rangle.
$$



This is in contrast to the following



enter image description here



At which point is my argument flawed? Any help is appreciated.






linear-algebra inner-product-space







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What have you done in the last expression?
    $endgroup$
    – Aniruddha Deshmukh
    Dec 8 '18 at 12:47










  • $begingroup$
    @AniruddhaDeshmukh I have merely applied the skew symmetry property.
    $endgroup$
    – Mathematicing
    Dec 8 '18 at 12:48
















2












$begingroup$


Suppose $vec{u}, vec{v} in left(V, mathbb{C}^{n}right)$: by construction
$$
begin{split}
vec{u} &= sum_{i=1}^{n}u_{i}vec{e}_{i}\
vec{v} &= sum_{i=1}^{n}v_{i}vec{e}_{i}
end{split}.
$$



The inner product of vectors $vec{u}$ and $vec{v}$ gives



$$
langle vec{u}, vec{v}rangle
= langle sum_{i=1}^{n}u_{i}vec{e}_{i}, sum_{i=1}^{n}v_{i}vec{e}_{i}rangle.
$$



But $langle vec{u}, vec{v}rangle = langle vec{v}, vec{u}rangle^{*}$ with $*$ being the complex conjugate, and recalling that $langle X,alpha Yrangle = alpha^{*} langle X,Yrangle$ for $alpha$ a complex scalar, this gives
$$
left(sum_{i,j=1}^{n}u_{i}^{*}v_{j}langle vec{e}_{j}, vec{e}_{i}rangle right)^{*}
=sum_{i,j=1}^{n}u_{i}v_{j}^{*}
langle vec{e}_{j}, vec{e}_{i} rangle.
$$



This is in contrast to the following



enter image description here



At which point is my argument flawed? Any help is appreciated.






linear-algebra inner-product-space







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What have you done in the last expression?
    $endgroup$
    – Aniruddha Deshmukh
    Dec 8 '18 at 12:47










  • $begingroup$
    @AniruddhaDeshmukh I have merely applied the skew symmetry property.
    $endgroup$
    – Mathematicing
    Dec 8 '18 at 12:48














2












2








2





$begingroup$


Suppose $vec{u}, vec{v} in left(V, mathbb{C}^{n}right)$: by construction
$$
begin{split}
vec{u} &= sum_{i=1}^{n}u_{i}vec{e}_{i}\
vec{v} &= sum_{i=1}^{n}v_{i}vec{e}_{i}
end{split}.
$$



The inner product of vectors $vec{u}$ and $vec{v}$ gives



$$
langle vec{u}, vec{v}rangle
= langle sum_{i=1}^{n}u_{i}vec{e}_{i}, sum_{i=1}^{n}v_{i}vec{e}_{i}rangle.
$$



But $langle vec{u}, vec{v}rangle = langle vec{v}, vec{u}rangle^{*}$ with $*$ being the complex conjugate, and recalling that $langle X,alpha Yrangle = alpha^{*} langle X,Yrangle$ for $alpha$ a complex scalar, this gives
$$
left(sum_{i,j=1}^{n}u_{i}^{*}v_{j}langle vec{e}_{j}, vec{e}_{i}rangle right)^{*}
=sum_{i,j=1}^{n}u_{i}v_{j}^{*}
langle vec{e}_{j}, vec{e}_{i} rangle.
$$



This is in contrast to the following



enter image description here



At which point is my argument flawed? Any help is appreciated.






linear-algebra inner-product-space







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Suppose $vec{u}, vec{v} in left(V, mathbb{C}^{n}right)$: by construction
$$
begin{split}
vec{u} &= sum_{i=1}^{n}u_{i}vec{e}_{i}\
vec{v} &= sum_{i=1}^{n}v_{i}vec{e}_{i}
end{split}.
$$



The inner product of vectors $vec{u}$ and $vec{v}$ gives



$$
langle vec{u}, vec{v}rangle
= langle sum_{i=1}^{n}u_{i}vec{e}_{i}, sum_{i=1}^{n}v_{i}vec{e}_{i}rangle.
$$



But $langle vec{u}, vec{v}rangle = langle vec{v}, vec{u}rangle^{*}$ with $*$ being the complex conjugate, and recalling that $langle X,alpha Yrangle = alpha^{*} langle X,Yrangle$ for $alpha$ a complex scalar, this gives
$$
left(sum_{i,j=1}^{n}u_{i}^{*}v_{j}langle vec{e}_{j}, vec{e}_{i}rangle right)^{*}
=sum_{i,j=1}^{n}u_{i}v_{j}^{*}
langle vec{e}_{j}, vec{e}_{i} rangle.
$$



This is in contrast to the following



enter image description here



At which point is my argument flawed? Any help is appreciated.






linear-algebra inner-product-space




linear-algebra inner-product-space






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 8 '18 at 12:50









amWhy

1




1










asked Dec 8 '18 at 12:38









MathematicingMathematicing

2,44821855




2,44821855












  • $begingroup$
    What have you done in the last expression?
    $endgroup$
    – Aniruddha Deshmukh
    Dec 8 '18 at 12:47










  • $begingroup$
    @AniruddhaDeshmukh I have merely applied the skew symmetry property.
    $endgroup$
    – Mathematicing
    Dec 8 '18 at 12:48


















  • $begingroup$
    What have you done in the last expression?
    $endgroup$
    – Aniruddha Deshmukh
    Dec 8 '18 at 12:47










  • $begingroup$
    @AniruddhaDeshmukh I have merely applied the skew symmetry property.
    $endgroup$
    – Mathematicing
    Dec 8 '18 at 12:48
















$begingroup$
What have you done in the last expression?
$endgroup$
– Aniruddha Deshmukh
Dec 8 '18 at 12:47




$begingroup$
What have you done in the last expression?
$endgroup$
– Aniruddha Deshmukh
Dec 8 '18 at 12:47












$begingroup$
@AniruddhaDeshmukh I have merely applied the skew symmetry property.
$endgroup$
– Mathematicing
Dec 8 '18 at 12:48




$begingroup$
@AniruddhaDeshmukh I have merely applied the skew symmetry property.
$endgroup$
– Mathematicing
Dec 8 '18 at 12:48










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

You must take care that there are two different conventions:



In some cases the hermitian inner product is defined as $langle u,v rangle=u^tbar{v}$,



in other cases it is defined as $langle u,v rangle=bar{u}^t v=u^*v$ (mostly in quantum mechanics, Dirac's bra-ket notations)



Further details Alternative definitions, notations and remarks



It is the origin of the confusion, in your first statement you use the first convention, in the last one, the second one.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031060%2finner-product-of-two-vectors-in-complex-vector-space-in-index-notation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    You must take care that there are two different conventions:



    In some cases the hermitian inner product is defined as $langle u,v rangle=u^tbar{v}$,



    in other cases it is defined as $langle u,v rangle=bar{u}^t v=u^*v$ (mostly in quantum mechanics, Dirac's bra-ket notations)



    Further details Alternative definitions, notations and remarks



    It is the origin of the confusion, in your first statement you use the first convention, in the last one, the second one.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      You must take care that there are two different conventions:



      In some cases the hermitian inner product is defined as $langle u,v rangle=u^tbar{v}$,



      in other cases it is defined as $langle u,v rangle=bar{u}^t v=u^*v$ (mostly in quantum mechanics, Dirac's bra-ket notations)



      Further details Alternative definitions, notations and remarks



      It is the origin of the confusion, in your first statement you use the first convention, in the last one, the second one.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        You must take care that there are two different conventions:



        In some cases the hermitian inner product is defined as $langle u,v rangle=u^tbar{v}$,



        in other cases it is defined as $langle u,v rangle=bar{u}^t v=u^*v$ (mostly in quantum mechanics, Dirac's bra-ket notations)



        Further details Alternative definitions, notations and remarks



        It is the origin of the confusion, in your first statement you use the first convention, in the last one, the second one.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        You must take care that there are two different conventions:



        In some cases the hermitian inner product is defined as $langle u,v rangle=u^tbar{v}$,



        in other cases it is defined as $langle u,v rangle=bar{u}^t v=u^*v$ (mostly in quantum mechanics, Dirac's bra-ket notations)



        Further details Alternative definitions, notations and remarks



        It is the origin of the confusion, in your first statement you use the first convention, in the last one, the second one.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Dec 8 '18 at 14:56

























        answered Dec 8 '18 at 12:57









        Picaud VincentPicaud Vincent

        1,49439




        1,49439






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031060%2finner-product-of-two-vectors-in-complex-vector-space-in-index-notation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

            Image
            0 0 $begingroup$ Need help with this problem. Suppose our lazy professor collects a quiz and a homework assignment from a class of n students one day, then distributes both the quizzes and the homework assignments back to the class in a random fashion for grading. Each student receives one quiz and one homework assignment to grade. (a) What is the probability that every student receives someone else's quiz to grade, and someone else's homework to grade? (b) What is the probability that no student receives both their own quiz and their own homework assignment to grade? In this case, some students may receive their own quiz, and others may receive their own homework assignment. (c) Compute the limiting probability as n approaches infinity in each case. ...
            Read more

            Aardman Animations

            Image
            Aardman Animations, Ltd. Aardman Animations Tipo privada Atividade Animação em stop-motion , Animação em CGI Fundação 1972 Fundador(es) Peter Lord David Sproxton Sede Bristol, Inglaterra  Reino Unido Proprietário(s) Dreamworks Pessoas-chave Peter Lord David Sproxton Nick Park Divisões Aardman Features Aardman Digital Aardman Commercials Aardman Broadcast Aardman International Aardman Rights Aardman Effects Aardman 3-D Systems Aardman Nathan Love AardBoiled Website oficial aardman.com ...
            Read more

            Are they similar matrix

            Image
            0 $begingroup$ Do $begin{bmatrix} 0&i&0\0&0&1\0&0&0 end{bmatrix} $ and $begin{bmatrix} 0&0&0\-i&0&0\0&1&0 end{bmatrix} $ are similar.Is this True/false Clearly both are nilpotent and one is conjucate transpose of other but how to know if they are similar.i'm stuck. Please help me linear-algebra vector-spaces eigenvalues-eigenvectors generalizedeigenvector share | cite | improve this question edited Dec 10 '18 at 6:38 Vasanth Kris asked Dec 10 '18 at 6:19 ...
            Read more