Proving an infinite set not having any infinite decidable subsets is immune












0














Or, in other words, prove that an infinite set $S subset mathbb{N}$ that has no infinite decidable subsets also has no infinite enumerable subsets.



One idea I had is to show that the complement of $S$ has a non-empty intersection with any infinite enumerable set (kind of the reverse of how the existence of simple sets is proven), but since $S$ is not something we construct, I'm not sure how to proceed.










share|cite|improve this question



























    0














    Or, in other words, prove that an infinite set $S subset mathbb{N}$ that has no infinite decidable subsets also has no infinite enumerable subsets.



    One idea I had is to show that the complement of $S$ has a non-empty intersection with any infinite enumerable set (kind of the reverse of how the existence of simple sets is proven), but since $S$ is not something we construct, I'm not sure how to proceed.










    share|cite|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0







      Or, in other words, prove that an infinite set $S subset mathbb{N}$ that has no infinite decidable subsets also has no infinite enumerable subsets.



      One idea I had is to show that the complement of $S$ has a non-empty intersection with any infinite enumerable set (kind of the reverse of how the existence of simple sets is proven), but since $S$ is not something we construct, I'm not sure how to proceed.










      share|cite|improve this question













      Or, in other words, prove that an infinite set $S subset mathbb{N}$ that has no infinite decidable subsets also has no infinite enumerable subsets.



      One idea I had is to show that the complement of $S$ has a non-empty intersection with any infinite enumerable set (kind of the reverse of how the existence of simple sets is proven), but since $S$ is not something we construct, I'm not sure how to proceed.







      logic computability






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 25 at 20:55









      0xd34df00d

      397212




      397212






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          Self-answering my second question on this branch of math.



          I managed to prove that every enumerable set $S$ has a decidable subset (it's sufficient to show a monotonically increasing function defined via a computable function $f$ whose domain or codomain is $S$). The result immediately follows.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013382%2fproving-an-infinite-set-not-having-any-infinite-decidable-subsets-is-immune%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            Self-answering my second question on this branch of math.



            I managed to prove that every enumerable set $S$ has a decidable subset (it's sufficient to show a monotonically increasing function defined via a computable function $f$ whose domain or codomain is $S$). The result immediately follows.






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              1














              Self-answering my second question on this branch of math.



              I managed to prove that every enumerable set $S$ has a decidable subset (it's sufficient to show a monotonically increasing function defined via a computable function $f$ whose domain or codomain is $S$). The result immediately follows.






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                1












                1








                1






                Self-answering my second question on this branch of math.



                I managed to prove that every enumerable set $S$ has a decidable subset (it's sufficient to show a monotonically increasing function defined via a computable function $f$ whose domain or codomain is $S$). The result immediately follows.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                Self-answering my second question on this branch of math.



                I managed to prove that every enumerable set $S$ has a decidable subset (it's sufficient to show a monotonically increasing function defined via a computable function $f$ whose domain or codomain is $S$). The result immediately follows.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 26 at 18:28









                0xd34df00d

                397212




                397212






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013382%2fproving-an-infinite-set-not-having-any-infinite-decidable-subsets-is-immune%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How do I know what Microsoft account the skydrive app is syncing to?

                    When does type information flow backwards in C++?

                    Grease: Live!