Using strong law of large numbers to construct a measure
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
How can I apply the strong law of large numbers to construct a measure ${mu_p}$ on $([0,1],mathcal{B}([0,1]))$ such that ${mu_p}$'s are singular to $lambda_{Leb}$ and the distribution function of $mu_p$ is continuous?
To be more precise for such $mu_p$, if $p_1 neq p_2$, then $mu_{p_1} perp mu_{p_2}$, and in particular if $p neq frac{1}{2}$, $mu_p perp lambda$ where $lambda$ is the Lebesgue measure on $mathbb{R}$.
probability-theory lebesgue-measure law-of-large-numbers
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
How can I apply the strong law of large numbers to construct a measure ${mu_p}$ on $([0,1],mathcal{B}([0,1]))$ such that ${mu_p}$'s are singular to $lambda_{Leb}$ and the distribution function of $mu_p$ is continuous?
To be more precise for such $mu_p$, if $p_1 neq p_2$, then $mu_{p_1} perp mu_{p_2}$, and in particular if $p neq frac{1}{2}$, $mu_p perp lambda$ where $lambda$ is the Lebesgue measure on $mathbb{R}$.
probability-theory lebesgue-measure law-of-large-numbers
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
How can I apply the strong law of large numbers to construct a measure ${mu_p}$ on $([0,1],mathcal{B}([0,1]))$ such that ${mu_p}$'s are singular to $lambda_{Leb}$ and the distribution function of $mu_p$ is continuous?
To be more precise for such $mu_p$, if $p_1 neq p_2$, then $mu_{p_1} perp mu_{p_2}$, and in particular if $p neq frac{1}{2}$, $mu_p perp lambda$ where $lambda$ is the Lebesgue measure on $mathbb{R}$.
probability-theory lebesgue-measure law-of-large-numbers
How can I apply the strong law of large numbers to construct a measure ${mu_p}$ on $([0,1],mathcal{B}([0,1]))$ such that ${mu_p}$'s are singular to $lambda_{Leb}$ and the distribution function of $mu_p$ is continuous?
To be more precise for such $mu_p$, if $p_1 neq p_2$, then $mu_{p_1} perp mu_{p_2}$, and in particular if $p neq frac{1}{2}$, $mu_p perp lambda$ where $lambda$ is the Lebesgue measure on $mathbb{R}$.
probability-theory lebesgue-measure law-of-large-numbers
probability-theory lebesgue-measure law-of-large-numbers
asked Nov 15 at 16:48
Weak Nullstellensatz
163
163
add a comment |
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2999955%2fusing-strong-law-of-large-numbers-to-construct-a-measure%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown