In parallelogram ABCD, points E and F are chosen on sides AB and CD, respectively.
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
In parallelogram ABCD, points E and F are chosen on sides AB and CD, respectively, so that AE = DE
and CF/DF=2/3. Find the ratio of the area of triangle BFC to the area of quadrilateral BEDF.
I'd appreciate it if someone could show a step-by-step solution to the problem. :)
geometry
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
In parallelogram ABCD, points E and F are chosen on sides AB and CD, respectively, so that AE = DE
and CF/DF=2/3. Find the ratio of the area of triangle BFC to the area of quadrilateral BEDF.
I'd appreciate it if someone could show a step-by-step solution to the problem. :)
geometry
Did you make a typo somewhere, please check!
– Oldboy
Nov 16 at 15:02
1
What have you tried? Where are you stuck?
– Jens
Nov 16 at 15:26
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
In parallelogram ABCD, points E and F are chosen on sides AB and CD, respectively, so that AE = DE
and CF/DF=2/3. Find the ratio of the area of triangle BFC to the area of quadrilateral BEDF.
I'd appreciate it if someone could show a step-by-step solution to the problem. :)
geometry
In parallelogram ABCD, points E and F are chosen on sides AB and CD, respectively, so that AE = DE
and CF/DF=2/3. Find the ratio of the area of triangle BFC to the area of quadrilateral BEDF.
I'd appreciate it if someone could show a step-by-step solution to the problem. :)
geometry
geometry
asked Nov 16 at 13:42
Isaiah Leobrera
271
271
Did you make a typo somewhere, please check!
– Oldboy
Nov 16 at 15:02
1
What have you tried? Where are you stuck?
– Jens
Nov 16 at 15:26
add a comment |
Did you make a typo somewhere, please check!
– Oldboy
Nov 16 at 15:02
1
What have you tried? Where are you stuck?
– Jens
Nov 16 at 15:26
Did you make a typo somewhere, please check!
– Oldboy
Nov 16 at 15:02
Did you make a typo somewhere, please check!
– Oldboy
Nov 16 at 15:02
1
1
What have you tried? Where are you stuck?
– Jens
Nov 16 at 15:26
What have you tried? Where are you stuck?
– Jens
Nov 16 at 15:26
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Choosing these points is in general not possible:
If $AE=DE$, then $E$ has to be on the perpendicular bisector of $A$ and $D$. But $E$ is also on $AB$. Hence $E$ is on the intersection of this line and this segment. But if the segment $AD$ is too short, then there is no intersection.
In fact, if $alpha$ is the angle at $A$, then we need $ABge frac{AD} {2 cos(alpha)}$.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
In parallelogram $ABCD$, given $AE=DE$ and $frac{CF}{DF}=frac{2}{3}$, then joining $DB$, and taking $AD$ and $angle DAB$ as fixed, and sliding $AD$ to the right until $E$ coincides with $B$, then$$frac{triangle BFC}{BEDF}=frac{2}{3}$$since triangles under the same height have areas proportional to their bases.
On the other hand, if we slide $AD$ increasingly to the left, quadrilateral $BEDF$ becomes an ever greater fraction of the lengthening trapezoid $ABFD$. Disregarding $triangle ADE$ as negligible, then, and since a parallelogram is double a triangle of equal base and height, the ratio of $triangle BFC$ to quadrilateral $BEDF$, as $AD$ moves to the left, approaches the ratio $frac{triangle BFC}{ABCD}$, i.e. diminishes indefinitely toward$$frac{2}{3}cdotfrac{1}{2}=frac{1}{3}$$
I am not confident this answer meets the real intent of OP's problem, but based on the information given, the most I can conclude is that$$frac{1}{3}<frac{triangle BFC}{BEDF}<frac{2}{3}$$
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Choosing these points is in general not possible:
If $AE=DE$, then $E$ has to be on the perpendicular bisector of $A$ and $D$. But $E$ is also on $AB$. Hence $E$ is on the intersection of this line and this segment. But if the segment $AD$ is too short, then there is no intersection.
In fact, if $alpha$ is the angle at $A$, then we need $ABge frac{AD} {2 cos(alpha)}$.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Choosing these points is in general not possible:
If $AE=DE$, then $E$ has to be on the perpendicular bisector of $A$ and $D$. But $E$ is also on $AB$. Hence $E$ is on the intersection of this line and this segment. But if the segment $AD$ is too short, then there is no intersection.
In fact, if $alpha$ is the angle at $A$, then we need $ABge frac{AD} {2 cos(alpha)}$.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Choosing these points is in general not possible:
If $AE=DE$, then $E$ has to be on the perpendicular bisector of $A$ and $D$. But $E$ is also on $AB$. Hence $E$ is on the intersection of this line and this segment. But if the segment $AD$ is too short, then there is no intersection.
In fact, if $alpha$ is the angle at $A$, then we need $ABge frac{AD} {2 cos(alpha)}$.
Choosing these points is in general not possible:
If $AE=DE$, then $E$ has to be on the perpendicular bisector of $A$ and $D$. But $E$ is also on $AB$. Hence $E$ is on the intersection of this line and this segment. But if the segment $AD$ is too short, then there is no intersection.
In fact, if $alpha$ is the angle at $A$, then we need $ABge frac{AD} {2 cos(alpha)}$.
answered Nov 16 at 15:57
klirk
2,215428
2,215428
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
In parallelogram $ABCD$, given $AE=DE$ and $frac{CF}{DF}=frac{2}{3}$, then joining $DB$, and taking $AD$ and $angle DAB$ as fixed, and sliding $AD$ to the right until $E$ coincides with $B$, then$$frac{triangle BFC}{BEDF}=frac{2}{3}$$since triangles under the same height have areas proportional to their bases.
On the other hand, if we slide $AD$ increasingly to the left, quadrilateral $BEDF$ becomes an ever greater fraction of the lengthening trapezoid $ABFD$. Disregarding $triangle ADE$ as negligible, then, and since a parallelogram is double a triangle of equal base and height, the ratio of $triangle BFC$ to quadrilateral $BEDF$, as $AD$ moves to the left, approaches the ratio $frac{triangle BFC}{ABCD}$, i.e. diminishes indefinitely toward$$frac{2}{3}cdotfrac{1}{2}=frac{1}{3}$$
I am not confident this answer meets the real intent of OP's problem, but based on the information given, the most I can conclude is that$$frac{1}{3}<frac{triangle BFC}{BEDF}<frac{2}{3}$$
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
In parallelogram $ABCD$, given $AE=DE$ and $frac{CF}{DF}=frac{2}{3}$, then joining $DB$, and taking $AD$ and $angle DAB$ as fixed, and sliding $AD$ to the right until $E$ coincides with $B$, then$$frac{triangle BFC}{BEDF}=frac{2}{3}$$since triangles under the same height have areas proportional to their bases.
On the other hand, if we slide $AD$ increasingly to the left, quadrilateral $BEDF$ becomes an ever greater fraction of the lengthening trapezoid $ABFD$. Disregarding $triangle ADE$ as negligible, then, and since a parallelogram is double a triangle of equal base and height, the ratio of $triangle BFC$ to quadrilateral $BEDF$, as $AD$ moves to the left, approaches the ratio $frac{triangle BFC}{ABCD}$, i.e. diminishes indefinitely toward$$frac{2}{3}cdotfrac{1}{2}=frac{1}{3}$$
I am not confident this answer meets the real intent of OP's problem, but based on the information given, the most I can conclude is that$$frac{1}{3}<frac{triangle BFC}{BEDF}<frac{2}{3}$$
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
In parallelogram $ABCD$, given $AE=DE$ and $frac{CF}{DF}=frac{2}{3}$, then joining $DB$, and taking $AD$ and $angle DAB$ as fixed, and sliding $AD$ to the right until $E$ coincides with $B$, then$$frac{triangle BFC}{BEDF}=frac{2}{3}$$since triangles under the same height have areas proportional to their bases.
On the other hand, if we slide $AD$ increasingly to the left, quadrilateral $BEDF$ becomes an ever greater fraction of the lengthening trapezoid $ABFD$. Disregarding $triangle ADE$ as negligible, then, and since a parallelogram is double a triangle of equal base and height, the ratio of $triangle BFC$ to quadrilateral $BEDF$, as $AD$ moves to the left, approaches the ratio $frac{triangle BFC}{ABCD}$, i.e. diminishes indefinitely toward$$frac{2}{3}cdotfrac{1}{2}=frac{1}{3}$$
I am not confident this answer meets the real intent of OP's problem, but based on the information given, the most I can conclude is that$$frac{1}{3}<frac{triangle BFC}{BEDF}<frac{2}{3}$$
In parallelogram $ABCD$, given $AE=DE$ and $frac{CF}{DF}=frac{2}{3}$, then joining $DB$, and taking $AD$ and $angle DAB$ as fixed, and sliding $AD$ to the right until $E$ coincides with $B$, then$$frac{triangle BFC}{BEDF}=frac{2}{3}$$since triangles under the same height have areas proportional to their bases.
On the other hand, if we slide $AD$ increasingly to the left, quadrilateral $BEDF$ becomes an ever greater fraction of the lengthening trapezoid $ABFD$. Disregarding $triangle ADE$ as negligible, then, and since a parallelogram is double a triangle of equal base and height, the ratio of $triangle BFC$ to quadrilateral $BEDF$, as $AD$ moves to the left, approaches the ratio $frac{triangle BFC}{ABCD}$, i.e. diminishes indefinitely toward$$frac{2}{3}cdotfrac{1}{2}=frac{1}{3}$$
I am not confident this answer meets the real intent of OP's problem, but based on the information given, the most I can conclude is that$$frac{1}{3}<frac{triangle BFC}{BEDF}<frac{2}{3}$$
answered Nov 16 at 23:22
Edward Porcella
1,3661411
1,3661411
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3001151%2fin-parallelogram-abcd-points-e-and-f-are-chosen-on-sides-ab-and-cd-respectivel%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Did you make a typo somewhere, please check!
– Oldboy
Nov 16 at 15:02
1
What have you tried? Where are you stuck?
– Jens
Nov 16 at 15:26