Absolute convergence of an complex integral
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I would like to show that the integral $$I(t)=int_{B-iinfty}^{B+iinfty}left|at^2+frac{M}{4a}right|^{-(1+s)}|e^{2pi nt}|dt$$ converges for $Re(s)>-frac{1}{2},B>0, ain mathbb{Z}, n,Min mathbb{N}$ and satisfies an uniform estimate. Unfortunately, I do not know how to start, because I did not find anything about the convergence of a complex integral. Furthermore, I am not sure what is meant by uniform estimate meaning from what is the estimate independent. Note that I do not need the evaluation of the integral. I am thankful for every help and hint.
Using the tip I got begin{align*}I(t)&=iint_{-infty}^{infty}left|aB^2+2aBix-x^2+frac{M}{4a}right|^{-(1+s)}underbrace{|e^{2pi n ix}|}_{=1}|e^{2pi nB}|dx\&= i|e^{2pi nB}|int_{-infty}^{infty}left|-x^2+2aBix+aB^2+frac{M}{4a}right|^{-(1+s)}dx.end{align*} I would say that the integrand is of order $O(x^{-2-s})$. However, I am not sure how to formally show that this integral is now convergent since it is still over the whole real line.
integration complex-analysis
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I would like to show that the integral $$I(t)=int_{B-iinfty}^{B+iinfty}left|at^2+frac{M}{4a}right|^{-(1+s)}|e^{2pi nt}|dt$$ converges for $Re(s)>-frac{1}{2},B>0, ain mathbb{Z}, n,Min mathbb{N}$ and satisfies an uniform estimate. Unfortunately, I do not know how to start, because I did not find anything about the convergence of a complex integral. Furthermore, I am not sure what is meant by uniform estimate meaning from what is the estimate independent. Note that I do not need the evaluation of the integral. I am thankful for every help and hint.
Using the tip I got begin{align*}I(t)&=iint_{-infty}^{infty}left|aB^2+2aBix-x^2+frac{M}{4a}right|^{-(1+s)}underbrace{|e^{2pi n ix}|}_{=1}|e^{2pi nB}|dx\&= i|e^{2pi nB}|int_{-infty}^{infty}left|-x^2+2aBix+aB^2+frac{M}{4a}right|^{-(1+s)}dx.end{align*} I would say that the integrand is of order $O(x^{-2-s})$. However, I am not sure how to formally show that this integral is now convergent since it is still over the whole real line.
integration complex-analysis
Try changing variables $t = B + i x$ so it becomes an integral over the real line.
– eyeballfrog
Nov 16 at 1:39
Hi, I tried the changing of variables and edited it in the question. Was this the correct approach?
– Masterexe
Nov 16 at 2:00
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I would like to show that the integral $$I(t)=int_{B-iinfty}^{B+iinfty}left|at^2+frac{M}{4a}right|^{-(1+s)}|e^{2pi nt}|dt$$ converges for $Re(s)>-frac{1}{2},B>0, ain mathbb{Z}, n,Min mathbb{N}$ and satisfies an uniform estimate. Unfortunately, I do not know how to start, because I did not find anything about the convergence of a complex integral. Furthermore, I am not sure what is meant by uniform estimate meaning from what is the estimate independent. Note that I do not need the evaluation of the integral. I am thankful for every help and hint.
Using the tip I got begin{align*}I(t)&=iint_{-infty}^{infty}left|aB^2+2aBix-x^2+frac{M}{4a}right|^{-(1+s)}underbrace{|e^{2pi n ix}|}_{=1}|e^{2pi nB}|dx\&= i|e^{2pi nB}|int_{-infty}^{infty}left|-x^2+2aBix+aB^2+frac{M}{4a}right|^{-(1+s)}dx.end{align*} I would say that the integrand is of order $O(x^{-2-s})$. However, I am not sure how to formally show that this integral is now convergent since it is still over the whole real line.
integration complex-analysis
I would like to show that the integral $$I(t)=int_{B-iinfty}^{B+iinfty}left|at^2+frac{M}{4a}right|^{-(1+s)}|e^{2pi nt}|dt$$ converges for $Re(s)>-frac{1}{2},B>0, ain mathbb{Z}, n,Min mathbb{N}$ and satisfies an uniform estimate. Unfortunately, I do not know how to start, because I did not find anything about the convergence of a complex integral. Furthermore, I am not sure what is meant by uniform estimate meaning from what is the estimate independent. Note that I do not need the evaluation of the integral. I am thankful for every help and hint.
Using the tip I got begin{align*}I(t)&=iint_{-infty}^{infty}left|aB^2+2aBix-x^2+frac{M}{4a}right|^{-(1+s)}underbrace{|e^{2pi n ix}|}_{=1}|e^{2pi nB}|dx\&= i|e^{2pi nB}|int_{-infty}^{infty}left|-x^2+2aBix+aB^2+frac{M}{4a}right|^{-(1+s)}dx.end{align*} I would say that the integrand is of order $O(x^{-2-s})$. However, I am not sure how to formally show that this integral is now convergent since it is still over the whole real line.
integration complex-analysis
integration complex-analysis
edited Nov 16 at 1:59
asked Nov 16 at 1:25
Masterexe
53
53
Try changing variables $t = B + i x$ so it becomes an integral over the real line.
– eyeballfrog
Nov 16 at 1:39
Hi, I tried the changing of variables and edited it in the question. Was this the correct approach?
– Masterexe
Nov 16 at 2:00
add a comment |
Try changing variables $t = B + i x$ so it becomes an integral over the real line.
– eyeballfrog
Nov 16 at 1:39
Hi, I tried the changing of variables and edited it in the question. Was this the correct approach?
– Masterexe
Nov 16 at 2:00
Try changing variables $t = B + i x$ so it becomes an integral over the real line.
– eyeballfrog
Nov 16 at 1:39
Try changing variables $t = B + i x$ so it becomes an integral over the real line.
– eyeballfrog
Nov 16 at 1:39
Hi, I tried the changing of variables and edited it in the question. Was this the correct approach?
– Masterexe
Nov 16 at 2:00
Hi, I tried the changing of variables and edited it in the question. Was this the correct approach?
– Masterexe
Nov 16 at 2:00
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
The integrand is continuous on $mathbb{R}$ and $O(|x|^{-2(1-Re{s})})$ when $xgg 1$ which is integrable because the exponent is $>1$ this concludes your argument
The function is continuous. So on any finite domain the function is integrable. What matters is domination for large $|x|$
– Ezy
Nov 16 at 12:56
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
The integrand is continuous on $mathbb{R}$ and $O(|x|^{-2(1-Re{s})})$ when $xgg 1$ which is integrable because the exponent is $>1$ this concludes your argument
The function is continuous. So on any finite domain the function is integrable. What matters is domination for large $|x|$
– Ezy
Nov 16 at 12:56
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
The integrand is continuous on $mathbb{R}$ and $O(|x|^{-2(1-Re{s})})$ when $xgg 1$ which is integrable because the exponent is $>1$ this concludes your argument
The function is continuous. So on any finite domain the function is integrable. What matters is domination for large $|x|$
– Ezy
Nov 16 at 12:56
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
The integrand is continuous on $mathbb{R}$ and $O(|x|^{-2(1-Re{s})})$ when $xgg 1$ which is integrable because the exponent is $>1$ this concludes your argument
The integrand is continuous on $mathbb{R}$ and $O(|x|^{-2(1-Re{s})})$ when $xgg 1$ which is integrable because the exponent is $>1$ this concludes your argument
answered Nov 16 at 4:59
Ezy
54429
54429
The function is continuous. So on any finite domain the function is integrable. What matters is domination for large $|x|$
– Ezy
Nov 16 at 12:56
add a comment |
The function is continuous. So on any finite domain the function is integrable. What matters is domination for large $|x|$
– Ezy
Nov 16 at 12:56
The function is continuous. So on any finite domain the function is integrable. What matters is domination for large $|x|$
– Ezy
Nov 16 at 12:56
The function is continuous. So on any finite domain the function is integrable. What matters is domination for large $|x|$
– Ezy
Nov 16 at 12:56
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000588%2fabsolute-convergence-of-an-complex-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Try changing variables $t = B + i x$ so it becomes an integral over the real line.
– eyeballfrog
Nov 16 at 1:39
Hi, I tried the changing of variables and edited it in the question. Was this the correct approach?
– Masterexe
Nov 16 at 2:00