What's the “normal” opposite of flautando?
I'm writing a piece in which I need string instruments to switch regularly between flautando and normal timbre. How do I denote this? Basically, I need a word which means "normal" with regard to where the bow falls.
notation composition sheet-music string-instruments
add a comment |
I'm writing a piece in which I need string instruments to switch regularly between flautando and normal timbre. How do I denote this? Basically, I need a word which means "normal" with regard to where the bow falls.
notation composition sheet-music string-instruments
add a comment |
I'm writing a piece in which I need string instruments to switch regularly between flautando and normal timbre. How do I denote this? Basically, I need a word which means "normal" with regard to where the bow falls.
notation composition sheet-music string-instruments
I'm writing a piece in which I need string instruments to switch regularly between flautando and normal timbre. How do I denote this? Basically, I need a word which means "normal" with regard to where the bow falls.
notation composition sheet-music string-instruments
notation composition sheet-music string-instruments
edited Mar 11 at 22:03
Richard
45.9k7110196
45.9k7110196
asked Mar 11 at 20:42
Eoin O'KellyEoin O'Kelly
612
612
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Normale (norm.) or ordinario (ord.) are the standard methods for marking a return to regular articulation after using an alternative technique.
add a comment |
In doubt, you can always negate a specific playing instruction by mentioning it with a non prefix. In this case I'd probably write non flaut., if in your context ord. would not be clear enough.
Alternatively you could consider what particular sonic quality of “normal bowing” you want to contrast against flautando. Should it be the robust sound and attack? You might alternate between flautando and pesante. You want the opposite of the sweet airiness of a flautando? You could alternate between sul tasto and sul ponticello. Etc. etc..
add a comment |
In such cases, the notation arco is typically given to request that the performers play with standard technique.
So just as you specify flautando for some portions, simply specify arco for the other portions.
3
This is not the standard notation method, though most performers would probably understand what you're trying to say.
– Peter
Mar 11 at 22:02
1
I would stick with ord. Arco is pretty much reserved for not-pizzicato, and occasionally for not-colLegno.
– Carl Witthoft
Mar 12 at 12:51
@Peter (and Carl): Thanks for the information! I'm not a string player, so I always assumed arco simply meant "normal." Today I learned!
– Richard
Mar 12 at 14:12
1
As a violin player I would say do not type arco when you are alreadu using the bow, arco is Italian for bow. The term ord. is the standard indicating a return to ordinary playing after playing a special effect.
– Lars Peter Schultz
Mar 12 at 17:43
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "240"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81296%2fwhats-the-normal-opposite-of-flautando%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Normale (norm.) or ordinario (ord.) are the standard methods for marking a return to regular articulation after using an alternative technique.
add a comment |
Normale (norm.) or ordinario (ord.) are the standard methods for marking a return to regular articulation after using an alternative technique.
add a comment |
Normale (norm.) or ordinario (ord.) are the standard methods for marking a return to regular articulation after using an alternative technique.
Normale (norm.) or ordinario (ord.) are the standard methods for marking a return to regular articulation after using an alternative technique.
answered Mar 11 at 21:58
PeterPeter
2,937521
2,937521
add a comment |
add a comment |
In doubt, you can always negate a specific playing instruction by mentioning it with a non prefix. In this case I'd probably write non flaut., if in your context ord. would not be clear enough.
Alternatively you could consider what particular sonic quality of “normal bowing” you want to contrast against flautando. Should it be the robust sound and attack? You might alternate between flautando and pesante. You want the opposite of the sweet airiness of a flautando? You could alternate between sul tasto and sul ponticello. Etc. etc..
add a comment |
In doubt, you can always negate a specific playing instruction by mentioning it with a non prefix. In this case I'd probably write non flaut., if in your context ord. would not be clear enough.
Alternatively you could consider what particular sonic quality of “normal bowing” you want to contrast against flautando. Should it be the robust sound and attack? You might alternate between flautando and pesante. You want the opposite of the sweet airiness of a flautando? You could alternate between sul tasto and sul ponticello. Etc. etc..
add a comment |
In doubt, you can always negate a specific playing instruction by mentioning it with a non prefix. In this case I'd probably write non flaut., if in your context ord. would not be clear enough.
Alternatively you could consider what particular sonic quality of “normal bowing” you want to contrast against flautando. Should it be the robust sound and attack? You might alternate between flautando and pesante. You want the opposite of the sweet airiness of a flautando? You could alternate between sul tasto and sul ponticello. Etc. etc..
In doubt, you can always negate a specific playing instruction by mentioning it with a non prefix. In this case I'd probably write non flaut., if in your context ord. would not be clear enough.
Alternatively you could consider what particular sonic quality of “normal bowing” you want to contrast against flautando. Should it be the robust sound and attack? You might alternate between flautando and pesante. You want the opposite of the sweet airiness of a flautando? You could alternate between sul tasto and sul ponticello. Etc. etc..
edited Mar 11 at 22:47
answered Mar 11 at 22:40
leftaroundaboutleftaroundabout
20.8k3790
20.8k3790
add a comment |
add a comment |
In such cases, the notation arco is typically given to request that the performers play with standard technique.
So just as you specify flautando for some portions, simply specify arco for the other portions.
3
This is not the standard notation method, though most performers would probably understand what you're trying to say.
– Peter
Mar 11 at 22:02
1
I would stick with ord. Arco is pretty much reserved for not-pizzicato, and occasionally for not-colLegno.
– Carl Witthoft
Mar 12 at 12:51
@Peter (and Carl): Thanks for the information! I'm not a string player, so I always assumed arco simply meant "normal." Today I learned!
– Richard
Mar 12 at 14:12
1
As a violin player I would say do not type arco when you are alreadu using the bow, arco is Italian for bow. The term ord. is the standard indicating a return to ordinary playing after playing a special effect.
– Lars Peter Schultz
Mar 12 at 17:43
add a comment |
In such cases, the notation arco is typically given to request that the performers play with standard technique.
So just as you specify flautando for some portions, simply specify arco for the other portions.
3
This is not the standard notation method, though most performers would probably understand what you're trying to say.
– Peter
Mar 11 at 22:02
1
I would stick with ord. Arco is pretty much reserved for not-pizzicato, and occasionally for not-colLegno.
– Carl Witthoft
Mar 12 at 12:51
@Peter (and Carl): Thanks for the information! I'm not a string player, so I always assumed arco simply meant "normal." Today I learned!
– Richard
Mar 12 at 14:12
1
As a violin player I would say do not type arco when you are alreadu using the bow, arco is Italian for bow. The term ord. is the standard indicating a return to ordinary playing after playing a special effect.
– Lars Peter Schultz
Mar 12 at 17:43
add a comment |
In such cases, the notation arco is typically given to request that the performers play with standard technique.
So just as you specify flautando for some portions, simply specify arco for the other portions.
In such cases, the notation arco is typically given to request that the performers play with standard technique.
So just as you specify flautando for some portions, simply specify arco for the other portions.
answered Mar 11 at 20:44
RichardRichard
45.9k7110196
45.9k7110196
3
This is not the standard notation method, though most performers would probably understand what you're trying to say.
– Peter
Mar 11 at 22:02
1
I would stick with ord. Arco is pretty much reserved for not-pizzicato, and occasionally for not-colLegno.
– Carl Witthoft
Mar 12 at 12:51
@Peter (and Carl): Thanks for the information! I'm not a string player, so I always assumed arco simply meant "normal." Today I learned!
– Richard
Mar 12 at 14:12
1
As a violin player I would say do not type arco when you are alreadu using the bow, arco is Italian for bow. The term ord. is the standard indicating a return to ordinary playing after playing a special effect.
– Lars Peter Schultz
Mar 12 at 17:43
add a comment |
3
This is not the standard notation method, though most performers would probably understand what you're trying to say.
– Peter
Mar 11 at 22:02
1
I would stick with ord. Arco is pretty much reserved for not-pizzicato, and occasionally for not-colLegno.
– Carl Witthoft
Mar 12 at 12:51
@Peter (and Carl): Thanks for the information! I'm not a string player, so I always assumed arco simply meant "normal." Today I learned!
– Richard
Mar 12 at 14:12
1
As a violin player I would say do not type arco when you are alreadu using the bow, arco is Italian for bow. The term ord. is the standard indicating a return to ordinary playing after playing a special effect.
– Lars Peter Schultz
Mar 12 at 17:43
3
3
This is not the standard notation method, though most performers would probably understand what you're trying to say.
– Peter
Mar 11 at 22:02
This is not the standard notation method, though most performers would probably understand what you're trying to say.
– Peter
Mar 11 at 22:02
1
1
I would stick with ord. Arco is pretty much reserved for not-pizzicato, and occasionally for not-colLegno.
– Carl Witthoft
Mar 12 at 12:51
I would stick with ord. Arco is pretty much reserved for not-pizzicato, and occasionally for not-colLegno.
– Carl Witthoft
Mar 12 at 12:51
@Peter (and Carl): Thanks for the information! I'm not a string player, so I always assumed arco simply meant "normal." Today I learned!
– Richard
Mar 12 at 14:12
@Peter (and Carl): Thanks for the information! I'm not a string player, so I always assumed arco simply meant "normal." Today I learned!
– Richard
Mar 12 at 14:12
1
1
As a violin player I would say do not type arco when you are alreadu using the bow, arco is Italian for bow. The term ord. is the standard indicating a return to ordinary playing after playing a special effect.
– Lars Peter Schultz
Mar 12 at 17:43
As a violin player I would say do not type arco when you are alreadu using the bow, arco is Italian for bow. The term ord. is the standard indicating a return to ordinary playing after playing a special effect.
– Lars Peter Schultz
Mar 12 at 17:43
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81296%2fwhats-the-normal-opposite-of-flautando%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown