How do I keep 110 files before allowing linux to rotate the logs?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
I'm trying to find out whether it is possible to configure linux to keep 110 copies of the audit log files. The setting is under /etc/audit/auditd.conf num_logs = 99
From reading, I understand that the max number that can be set is only up till 99. But still I would like to find out whether there are any method to increase this number.
linux logging logrotate
add a comment |
I'm trying to find out whether it is possible to configure linux to keep 110 copies of the audit log files. The setting is under /etc/audit/auditd.conf num_logs = 99
From reading, I understand that the max number that can be set is only up till 99. But still I would like to find out whether there are any method to increase this number.
linux logging logrotate
add a comment |
I'm trying to find out whether it is possible to configure linux to keep 110 copies of the audit log files. The setting is under /etc/audit/auditd.conf num_logs = 99
From reading, I understand that the max number that can be set is only up till 99. But still I would like to find out whether there are any method to increase this number.
linux logging logrotate
I'm trying to find out whether it is possible to configure linux to keep 110 copies of the audit log files. The setting is under /etc/audit/auditd.conf num_logs = 99
From reading, I understand that the max number that can be set is only up till 99. But still I would like to find out whether there are any method to increase this number.
linux logging logrotate
linux logging logrotate
asked Mar 12 at 5:06
user1192304user1192304
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Yes. You could recompile your own version and adapt it to allow an increase. You could copy those log files or you could use the limit of 99 and increase the log file sizes.
The last option is probably what you should be considering because it will give you the least amount of trouble and you probably care for the content of those files rather than actually having 110 files.
If it's about having a backlog of X days have a look at this Redhat post titled How to implement audit log rotation with compression based on time instead of size .
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1413279%2fhow-do-i-keep-110-files-before-allowing-linux-to-rotate-the-logs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Yes. You could recompile your own version and adapt it to allow an increase. You could copy those log files or you could use the limit of 99 and increase the log file sizes.
The last option is probably what you should be considering because it will give you the least amount of trouble and you probably care for the content of those files rather than actually having 110 files.
If it's about having a backlog of X days have a look at this Redhat post titled How to implement audit log rotation with compression based on time instead of size .
add a comment |
Yes. You could recompile your own version and adapt it to allow an increase. You could copy those log files or you could use the limit of 99 and increase the log file sizes.
The last option is probably what you should be considering because it will give you the least amount of trouble and you probably care for the content of those files rather than actually having 110 files.
If it's about having a backlog of X days have a look at this Redhat post titled How to implement audit log rotation with compression based on time instead of size .
add a comment |
Yes. You could recompile your own version and adapt it to allow an increase. You could copy those log files or you could use the limit of 99 and increase the log file sizes.
The last option is probably what you should be considering because it will give you the least amount of trouble and you probably care for the content of those files rather than actually having 110 files.
If it's about having a backlog of X days have a look at this Redhat post titled How to implement audit log rotation with compression based on time instead of size .
Yes. You could recompile your own version and adapt it to allow an increase. You could copy those log files or you could use the limit of 99 and increase the log file sizes.
The last option is probably what you should be considering because it will give you the least amount of trouble and you probably care for the content of those files rather than actually having 110 files.
If it's about having a backlog of X days have a look at this Redhat post titled How to implement audit log rotation with compression based on time instead of size .
answered Mar 12 at 6:26
SethSeth
6,73611128
6,73611128
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1413279%2fhow-do-i-keep-110-files-before-allowing-linux-to-rotate-the-logs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown