Find $p$ if $2p-1$ is a perfect square












0












$begingroup$


I need to find prime numbers $p$ such that $2p-1$ is a perfect square. I tried hard, but could not get a proper solution for this. I could guess $p=13$ works, but I need a proper rigorous solution for this. I cant think of one.






number-theory







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    And $p = 5, 41, 61, 113, 181,$ etc. What exactly are you trying to prove about such $p$?
    $endgroup$
    – anomaly
    Jan 9 at 5:09










  • $begingroup$
    Note that $p = 5$ also works as $2p - 1 = 9 = 3^2$.
    $endgroup$
    – John Omielan
    Jan 9 at 5:09






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is oeis.org/A027862
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Jan 9 at 5:15
















0












$begingroup$


I need to find prime numbers $p$ such that $2p-1$ is a perfect square. I tried hard, but could not get a proper solution for this. I could guess $p=13$ works, but I need a proper rigorous solution for this. I cant think of one.






number-theory







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    And $p = 5, 41, 61, 113, 181,$ etc. What exactly are you trying to prove about such $p$?
    $endgroup$
    – anomaly
    Jan 9 at 5:09










  • $begingroup$
    Note that $p = 5$ also works as $2p - 1 = 9 = 3^2$.
    $endgroup$
    – John Omielan
    Jan 9 at 5:09






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is oeis.org/A027862
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Jan 9 at 5:15














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I need to find prime numbers $p$ such that $2p-1$ is a perfect square. I tried hard, but could not get a proper solution for this. I could guess $p=13$ works, but I need a proper rigorous solution for this. I cant think of one.






number-theory







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I need to find prime numbers $p$ such that $2p-1$ is a perfect square. I tried hard, but could not get a proper solution for this. I could guess $p=13$ works, but I need a proper rigorous solution for this. I cant think of one.






number-theory




number-theory






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 9 at 5:01









YellowYellow

16011




16011








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    And $p = 5, 41, 61, 113, 181,$ etc. What exactly are you trying to prove about such $p$?
    $endgroup$
    – anomaly
    Jan 9 at 5:09










  • $begingroup$
    Note that $p = 5$ also works as $2p - 1 = 9 = 3^2$.
    $endgroup$
    – John Omielan
    Jan 9 at 5:09






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is oeis.org/A027862
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Jan 9 at 5:15














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    And $p = 5, 41, 61, 113, 181,$ etc. What exactly are you trying to prove about such $p$?
    $endgroup$
    – anomaly
    Jan 9 at 5:09










  • $begingroup$
    Note that $p = 5$ also works as $2p - 1 = 9 = 3^2$.
    $endgroup$
    – John Omielan
    Jan 9 at 5:09






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is oeis.org/A027862
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Jan 9 at 5:15








1




1




$begingroup$
And $p = 5, 41, 61, 113, 181,$ etc. What exactly are you trying to prove about such $p$?
$endgroup$
– anomaly
Jan 9 at 5:09




$begingroup$
And $p = 5, 41, 61, 113, 181,$ etc. What exactly are you trying to prove about such $p$?
$endgroup$
– anomaly
Jan 9 at 5:09












$begingroup$
Note that $p = 5$ also works as $2p - 1 = 9 = 3^2$.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Jan 9 at 5:09




$begingroup$
Note that $p = 5$ also works as $2p - 1 = 9 = 3^2$.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Jan 9 at 5:09




1




1




$begingroup$
This is oeis.org/A027862
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Jan 9 at 5:15




$begingroup$
This is oeis.org/A027862
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Jan 9 at 5:15










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

OEIS A027862 lists the primes $p$ of the form $p=n^2+(n+1)^2$. It remarks that these are the ones where $2p-1$ is a square. We can show that if $p$ is of this form $2p-1$ is a square because $$2p-1=2(n^2+(n+1)^2)-1=4n^2+4n+1=(2n+1)^2$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$

    All primes excluding $2$ and $3$ are of the form $6kpm 1$. We have that:



    $$2(6k+1)-1=12k+1$$
    This leads to $$12k=m^2-1$$
    $$12k=(m+1)(m-1)$$
    $$to m+1=12a, m-1=frac ka$$
    Or vice versa, subject to $a,k in Bbb Z, a|k$



    Now use:
    $$2(6k-1)-1=12k-3$$
    $$to 12k-4=m^2-1$$
    $$to 4(3k-1)=(m+1)(m-1)$$
    Go from there.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Excluding 2. And 3.
      $endgroup$
      – Lucas Henrique
      Jan 9 at 5:36










    • $begingroup$
      I'm stupid. Thanks
      $endgroup$
      – Rhys Hughes
      Jan 9 at 5:42












    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3067090%2ffind-p-if-2p-1-is-a-perfect-square%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    OEIS A027862 lists the primes $p$ of the form $p=n^2+(n+1)^2$. It remarks that these are the ones where $2p-1$ is a square. We can show that if $p$ is of this form $2p-1$ is a square because $$2p-1=2(n^2+(n+1)^2)-1=4n^2+4n+1=(2n+1)^2$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      OEIS A027862 lists the primes $p$ of the form $p=n^2+(n+1)^2$. It remarks that these are the ones where $2p-1$ is a square. We can show that if $p$ is of this form $2p-1$ is a square because $$2p-1=2(n^2+(n+1)^2)-1=4n^2+4n+1=(2n+1)^2$$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        OEIS A027862 lists the primes $p$ of the form $p=n^2+(n+1)^2$. It remarks that these are the ones where $2p-1$ is a square. We can show that if $p$ is of this form $2p-1$ is a square because $$2p-1=2(n^2+(n+1)^2)-1=4n^2+4n+1=(2n+1)^2$$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        OEIS A027862 lists the primes $p$ of the form $p=n^2+(n+1)^2$. It remarks that these are the ones where $2p-1$ is a square. We can show that if $p$ is of this form $2p-1$ is a square because $$2p-1=2(n^2+(n+1)^2)-1=4n^2+4n+1=(2n+1)^2$$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 9 at 5:36









        Ross MillikanRoss Millikan

        301k24200375




        301k24200375























            1












            $begingroup$

            All primes excluding $2$ and $3$ are of the form $6kpm 1$. We have that:



            $$2(6k+1)-1=12k+1$$
            This leads to $$12k=m^2-1$$
            $$12k=(m+1)(m-1)$$
            $$to m+1=12a, m-1=frac ka$$
            Or vice versa, subject to $a,k in Bbb Z, a|k$



            Now use:
            $$2(6k-1)-1=12k-3$$
            $$to 12k-4=m^2-1$$
            $$to 4(3k-1)=(m+1)(m-1)$$
            Go from there.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Excluding 2. And 3.
              $endgroup$
              – Lucas Henrique
              Jan 9 at 5:36










            • $begingroup$
              I'm stupid. Thanks
              $endgroup$
              – Rhys Hughes
              Jan 9 at 5:42
















            1












            $begingroup$

            All primes excluding $2$ and $3$ are of the form $6kpm 1$. We have that:



            $$2(6k+1)-1=12k+1$$
            This leads to $$12k=m^2-1$$
            $$12k=(m+1)(m-1)$$
            $$to m+1=12a, m-1=frac ka$$
            Or vice versa, subject to $a,k in Bbb Z, a|k$



            Now use:
            $$2(6k-1)-1=12k-3$$
            $$to 12k-4=m^2-1$$
            $$to 4(3k-1)=(m+1)(m-1)$$
            Go from there.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Excluding 2. And 3.
              $endgroup$
              – Lucas Henrique
              Jan 9 at 5:36










            • $begingroup$
              I'm stupid. Thanks
              $endgroup$
              – Rhys Hughes
              Jan 9 at 5:42














            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            All primes excluding $2$ and $3$ are of the form $6kpm 1$. We have that:



            $$2(6k+1)-1=12k+1$$
            This leads to $$12k=m^2-1$$
            $$12k=(m+1)(m-1)$$
            $$to m+1=12a, m-1=frac ka$$
            Or vice versa, subject to $a,k in Bbb Z, a|k$



            Now use:
            $$2(6k-1)-1=12k-3$$
            $$to 12k-4=m^2-1$$
            $$to 4(3k-1)=(m+1)(m-1)$$
            Go from there.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            All primes excluding $2$ and $3$ are of the form $6kpm 1$. We have that:



            $$2(6k+1)-1=12k+1$$
            This leads to $$12k=m^2-1$$
            $$12k=(m+1)(m-1)$$
            $$to m+1=12a, m-1=frac ka$$
            Or vice versa, subject to $a,k in Bbb Z, a|k$



            Now use:
            $$2(6k-1)-1=12k-3$$
            $$to 12k-4=m^2-1$$
            $$to 4(3k-1)=(m+1)(m-1)$$
            Go from there.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Jan 9 at 5:42

























            answered Jan 9 at 5:21









            Rhys HughesRhys Hughes

            7,0791630




            7,0791630












            • $begingroup$
              Excluding 2. And 3.
              $endgroup$
              – Lucas Henrique
              Jan 9 at 5:36










            • $begingroup$
              I'm stupid. Thanks
              $endgroup$
              – Rhys Hughes
              Jan 9 at 5:42


















            • $begingroup$
              Excluding 2. And 3.
              $endgroup$
              – Lucas Henrique
              Jan 9 at 5:36










            • $begingroup$
              I'm stupid. Thanks
              $endgroup$
              – Rhys Hughes
              Jan 9 at 5:42
















            $begingroup$
            Excluding 2. And 3.
            $endgroup$
            – Lucas Henrique
            Jan 9 at 5:36




            $begingroup$
            Excluding 2. And 3.
            $endgroup$
            – Lucas Henrique
            Jan 9 at 5:36












            $begingroup$
            I'm stupid. Thanks
            $endgroup$
            – Rhys Hughes
            Jan 9 at 5:42




            $begingroup$
            I'm stupid. Thanks
            $endgroup$
            – Rhys Hughes
            Jan 9 at 5:42


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3067090%2ffind-p-if-2p-1-is-a-perfect-square%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

            Image
            0 0 $begingroup$ Need help with this problem. Suppose our lazy professor collects a quiz and a homework assignment from a class of n students one day, then distributes both the quizzes and the homework assignments back to the class in a random fashion for grading. Each student receives one quiz and one homework assignment to grade. (a) What is the probability that every student receives someone else's quiz to grade, and someone else's homework to grade? (b) What is the probability that no student receives both their own quiz and their own homework assignment to grade? In this case, some students may receive their own quiz, and others may receive their own homework assignment. (c) Compute the limiting probability as n approaches infinity in each case. ...
            Read more

            Aardman Animations

            Image
            Aardman Animations, Ltd. Aardman Animations Tipo privada Atividade Animação em stop-motion , Animação em CGI Fundação 1972 Fundador(es) Peter Lord David Sproxton Sede Bristol, Inglaterra  Reino Unido Proprietário(s) Dreamworks Pessoas-chave Peter Lord David Sproxton Nick Park Divisões Aardman Features Aardman Digital Aardman Commercials Aardman Broadcast Aardman International Aardman Rights Aardman Effects Aardman 3-D Systems Aardman Nathan Love AardBoiled Website oficial aardman.com ...
            Read more

            Are they similar matrix

            Image
            0 $begingroup$ Do $begin{bmatrix} 0&i&0\0&0&1\0&0&0 end{bmatrix} $ and $begin{bmatrix} 0&0&0\-i&0&0\0&1&0 end{bmatrix} $ are similar.Is this True/false Clearly both are nilpotent and one is conjucate transpose of other but how to know if they are similar.i'm stuck. Please help me linear-algebra vector-spaces eigenvalues-eigenvectors generalizedeigenvector share | cite | improve this question edited Dec 10 '18 at 6:38 Vasanth Kris asked Dec 10 '18 at 6:19 ...
            Read more