Whittaker model equation
$begingroup$
This is from Cogdell and Piateski-Shapiro's paper Derivative and L-functions for $GL_n$.
Let $lambda$ be a non-trivial $psi$-Whittaker functional. The Whittaker model is defined as$W_v(g)=lambda(pi(g)v), vin V_{pi},gin GL_n$. We know that $W_vin W(tau,psi)$ iff there is a compact open subgroup $Ysubset U_n$ such that $$int_Y W_v(py)psi^{-1}(y)dy=0, pin P_n.$$
I am confused why this can lead to: if writing $p=gu, gin GL_{n-1}, uin U_n$, we have
$$
int_YW_v(guy) psi^{-1}(y)dy=W_v(gu)int_Ypsi(gyg^{-1})psi^{-1}(y)dy.
$$
I understand it must be using the fact of $lambda$ being a Whittaker functional, but I am still unable to show $W_v(guy)=W_v(gu)psi(gyg^{-1}),$ frustrated..
functional-analysis number-theory representation-theory automorphic-forms
asked Jan 9 at 4:38
AlahoiAlahoi
215
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is from Cogdell and Piateski-Shapiro's paper Derivative and L-functions for $GL_n$.
Let $lambda$ be a non-trivial $psi$-Whittaker functional. The Whittaker model is defined as$W_v(g)=lambda(pi(g)v), vin V_{pi},gin GL_n$. We know that $W_vin W(tau,psi)$ iff there is a compact open subgroup $Ysubset U_n$ such that $$int_Y W_v(py)psi^{-1}(y)dy=0, pin P_n.$$
I am confused why this can lead to: if writing $p=gu, gin GL_{n-1}, uin U_n$, we have
$$
int_YW_v(guy) psi^{-1}(y)dy=W_v(gu)int_Ypsi(gyg^{-1})psi^{-1}(y)dy.
$$
I understand it must be using the fact of $lambda$ being a Whittaker functional, but I am still unable to show $W_v(guy)=W_v(gu)psi(gyg^{-1}),$ frustrated..
functional-analysis number-theory representation-theory automorphic-forms
asked Jan 9 at 4:38
AlahoiAlahoi
215
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Perhaps try emailing Cogdell? I had a look at that paper but was also unable to derive this equality.
$endgroup$
– Peter Humphries
Jan 15 at 14:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is from Cogdell and Piateski-Shapiro's paper Derivative and L-functions for $GL_n$.
Let $lambda$ be a non-trivial $psi$-Whittaker functional. The Whittaker model is defined as$W_v(g)=lambda(pi(g)v), vin V_{pi},gin GL_n$. We know that $W_vin W(tau,psi)$ iff there is a compact open subgroup $Ysubset U_n$ such that $$int_Y W_v(py)psi^{-1}(y)dy=0, pin P_n.$$
I am confused why this can lead to: if writing $p=gu, gin GL_{n-1}, uin U_n$, we have
$$
int_YW_v(guy) psi^{-1}(y)dy=W_v(gu)int_Ypsi(gyg^{-1})psi^{-1}(y)dy.
$$
I understand it must be using the fact of $lambda$ being a Whittaker functional, but I am still unable to show $W_v(guy)=W_v(gu)psi(gyg^{-1}),$ frustrated..
functional-analysis number-theory representation-theory automorphic-forms
asked Jan 9 at 4:38
AlahoiAlahoi
215
$endgroup$
This is from Cogdell and Piateski-Shapiro's paper Derivative and L-functions for $GL_n$.
Let $lambda$ be a non-trivial $psi$-Whittaker functional. The Whittaker model is defined as$W_v(g)=lambda(pi(g)v), vin V_{pi},gin GL_n$. We know that $W_vin W(tau,psi)$ iff there is a compact open subgroup $Ysubset U_n$ such that $$int_Y W_v(py)psi^{-1}(y)dy=0, pin P_n.$$
I am confused why this can lead to: if writing $p=gu, gin GL_{n-1}, uin U_n$, we have
$$
int_YW_v(guy) psi^{-1}(y)dy=W_v(gu)int_Ypsi(gyg^{-1})psi^{-1}(y)dy.
$$
I understand it must be using the fact of $lambda$ being a Whittaker functional, but I am still unable to show $W_v(guy)=W_v(gu)psi(gyg^{-1}),$ frustrated..
functional-analysis number-theory representation-theory automorphic-forms
functional-analysis number-theory representation-theory automorphic-forms
asked Jan 9 at 4:38
AlahoiAlahoi
215
asked Jan 9 at 4:38
AlahoiAlahoi
215
asked Jan 9 at 4:38
AlahoiAlahoi
215
asked Jan 9 at 4:38
AlahoiAlahoi
215
asked Jan 9 at 4:38
AlahoiAlahoi
215
215
$begingroup$
Perhaps try emailing Cogdell? I had a look at that paper but was also unable to derive this equality.
$endgroup$
– Peter Humphries
Jan 15 at 14:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Perhaps try emailing Cogdell? I had a look at that paper but was also unable to derive this equality.
$endgroup$
– Peter Humphries
Jan 15 at 14:23
$begingroup$
Perhaps try emailing Cogdell? I had a look at that paper but was also unable to derive this equality.
$endgroup$
– Peter Humphries
Jan 15 at 14:23
$begingroup$
Perhaps try emailing Cogdell? I had a look at that paper but was also unable to derive this equality.
$endgroup$
– Peter Humphries
Jan 15 at 14:23
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
We just need to show $W_v(guy)=W_v(gu)psi(gyg^{-1})$.
In fact, since $guyu^{-1}g^{-1}in U_n$, and it is easy to verify $psi(guyu^{-1}g^{-1})=psi(gyg^{-1})$, hence
$$
W_v(guy)=W_v(guyu^{-1}g^{-1}gu)=psi(guyu^{-1}g^{-1})W_v(gu)=W_v(gu)psi(gyg^{-1}).
$$
answered Jan 28 at 17:06
AlahoiAlahoi
215
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3067073%2fwhittaker-model-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
We just need to show $W_v(guy)=W_v(gu)psi(gyg^{-1})$.
In fact, since $guyu^{-1}g^{-1}in U_n$, and it is easy to verify $psi(guyu^{-1}g^{-1})=psi(gyg^{-1})$, hence
$$
W_v(guy)=W_v(guyu^{-1}g^{-1}gu)=psi(guyu^{-1}g^{-1})W_v(gu)=W_v(gu)psi(gyg^{-1}).
$$
answered Jan 28 at 17:06
AlahoiAlahoi
215
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We just need to show $W_v(guy)=W_v(gu)psi(gyg^{-1})$.
In fact, since $guyu^{-1}g^{-1}in U_n$, and it is easy to verify $psi(guyu^{-1}g^{-1})=psi(gyg^{-1})$, hence
$$
W_v(guy)=W_v(guyu^{-1}g^{-1}gu)=psi(guyu^{-1}g^{-1})W_v(gu)=W_v(gu)psi(gyg^{-1}).
$$
answered Jan 28 at 17:06
AlahoiAlahoi
215
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We just need to show $W_v(guy)=W_v(gu)psi(gyg^{-1})$.
In fact, since $guyu^{-1}g^{-1}in U_n$, and it is easy to verify $psi(guyu^{-1}g^{-1})=psi(gyg^{-1})$, hence
$$
W_v(guy)=W_v(guyu^{-1}g^{-1}gu)=psi(guyu^{-1}g^{-1})W_v(gu)=W_v(gu)psi(gyg^{-1}).
$$
answered Jan 28 at 17:06
AlahoiAlahoi
215
$endgroup$
We just need to show $W_v(guy)=W_v(gu)psi(gyg^{-1})$.
In fact, since $guyu^{-1}g^{-1}in U_n$, and it is easy to verify $psi(guyu^{-1}g^{-1})=psi(gyg^{-1})$, hence
$$
W_v(guy)=W_v(guyu^{-1}g^{-1}gu)=psi(guyu^{-1}g^{-1})W_v(gu)=W_v(gu)psi(gyg^{-1}).
$$
answered Jan 28 at 17:06
AlahoiAlahoi
215
answered Jan 28 at 17:06
AlahoiAlahoi
215
answered Jan 28 at 17:06
AlahoiAlahoi
215
answered Jan 28 at 17:06
AlahoiAlahoi
215
215
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3067073%2fwhittaker-model-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Perhaps try emailing Cogdell? I had a look at that paper but was also unable to derive this equality.
$endgroup$
– Peter Humphries
Jan 15 at 14:23