Order of finite fields is $p^n$
$begingroup$
Let $F$ be a finite field.
.How do I prove that the order of $F$ is always of order $p^n$ where $p$ is prime?
finite-fields
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $F$ be a finite field.
.How do I prove that the order of $F$ is always of order $p^n$ where $p$ is prime?
finite-fields
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
What is the cardinality of any finite-dimensional vector space over the field with $p$ elements?
$endgroup$
– NKS
Oct 15 '11 at 17:50
$begingroup$
What exactly is the scalar field and the multiplication law?
$endgroup$
– Mohan
Oct 15 '11 at 18:14
$begingroup$
The scalar field is the subfield consisting of the elements $0$, $1$, $1+1$, $1+1+1$, $1+1+1+1$ and so forth. (You first have to prove this is in fact a subfield, of course). Multiplication is whatever passes for multiplication in the finite field.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Oct 15 '11 at 18:37
$begingroup$
First prove that if $charF=p $ then $F_p$ is a subfield of $F$.
$endgroup$
– Frank Murphy
Oct 15 '11 at 19:27
$begingroup$
The answers to this question contain all the information that you need. IOW this is almost an exact duplicate.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Oct 16 '11 at 6:17
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $F$ be a finite field.
.How do I prove that the order of $F$ is always of order $p^n$ where $p$ is prime?
finite-fields
$endgroup$
Let $F$ be a finite field.
.How do I prove that the order of $F$ is always of order $p^n$ where $p$ is prime?
finite-fields
finite-fields
asked Oct 15 '11 at 17:45
MohanMohan
6,0271356102
6,0271356102
4
$begingroup$
What is the cardinality of any finite-dimensional vector space over the field with $p$ elements?
$endgroup$
– NKS
Oct 15 '11 at 17:50
$begingroup$
What exactly is the scalar field and the multiplication law?
$endgroup$
– Mohan
Oct 15 '11 at 18:14
$begingroup$
The scalar field is the subfield consisting of the elements $0$, $1$, $1+1$, $1+1+1$, $1+1+1+1$ and so forth. (You first have to prove this is in fact a subfield, of course). Multiplication is whatever passes for multiplication in the finite field.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Oct 15 '11 at 18:37
$begingroup$
First prove that if $charF=p $ then $F_p$ is a subfield of $F$.
$endgroup$
– Frank Murphy
Oct 15 '11 at 19:27
$begingroup$
The answers to this question contain all the information that you need. IOW this is almost an exact duplicate.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Oct 16 '11 at 6:17
add a comment |
4
$begingroup$
What is the cardinality of any finite-dimensional vector space over the field with $p$ elements?
$endgroup$
– NKS
Oct 15 '11 at 17:50
$begingroup$
What exactly is the scalar field and the multiplication law?
$endgroup$
– Mohan
Oct 15 '11 at 18:14
$begingroup$
The scalar field is the subfield consisting of the elements $0$, $1$, $1+1$, $1+1+1$, $1+1+1+1$ and so forth. (You first have to prove this is in fact a subfield, of course). Multiplication is whatever passes for multiplication in the finite field.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Oct 15 '11 at 18:37
$begingroup$
First prove that if $charF=p $ then $F_p$ is a subfield of $F$.
$endgroup$
– Frank Murphy
Oct 15 '11 at 19:27
$begingroup$
The answers to this question contain all the information that you need. IOW this is almost an exact duplicate.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Oct 16 '11 at 6:17
4
4
$begingroup$
What is the cardinality of any finite-dimensional vector space over the field with $p$ elements?
$endgroup$
– NKS
Oct 15 '11 at 17:50
$begingroup$
What is the cardinality of any finite-dimensional vector space over the field with $p$ elements?
$endgroup$
– NKS
Oct 15 '11 at 17:50
$begingroup$
What exactly is the scalar field and the multiplication law?
$endgroup$
– Mohan
Oct 15 '11 at 18:14
$begingroup$
What exactly is the scalar field and the multiplication law?
$endgroup$
– Mohan
Oct 15 '11 at 18:14
$begingroup$
The scalar field is the subfield consisting of the elements $0$, $1$, $1+1$, $1+1+1$, $1+1+1+1$ and so forth. (You first have to prove this is in fact a subfield, of course). Multiplication is whatever passes for multiplication in the finite field.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Oct 15 '11 at 18:37
$begingroup$
The scalar field is the subfield consisting of the elements $0$, $1$, $1+1$, $1+1+1$, $1+1+1+1$ and so forth. (You first have to prove this is in fact a subfield, of course). Multiplication is whatever passes for multiplication in the finite field.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Oct 15 '11 at 18:37
$begingroup$
First prove that if $charF=p $ then $F_p$ is a subfield of $F$.
$endgroup$
– Frank Murphy
Oct 15 '11 at 19:27
$begingroup$
First prove that if $charF=p $ then $F_p$ is a subfield of $F$.
$endgroup$
– Frank Murphy
Oct 15 '11 at 19:27
$begingroup$
The answers to this question contain all the information that you need. IOW this is almost an exact duplicate.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Oct 16 '11 at 6:17
$begingroup$
The answers to this question contain all the information that you need. IOW this is almost an exact duplicate.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Oct 16 '11 at 6:17
add a comment |
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Prove that the smallest multiple $m$ of 1 that gives zero has to be a prime. (Otherwise there are divisors of $m$ which are then divisors of zero.)
Prove that a field is a vector space over a subfield.
Count the elements of the field if the dimension of this vector space is $n$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $p$ be the characteristic of a finite field $F$. Then since $1$ has order $p$ in $(F,+)$, we know that $p$ divides $|F|$. Now let $qneq p$ be any other prime dividing $|F|$. Then by Cauchy's Theorem, there is an element $xin F$ whose order in $(F,+)$ is $q$.
Then $qcdot x=0$. But we also have $pcdot x=0$. Now since $p$ and $q$ are relatively prime, we can find integers $a$ and $b$ such that $ap+bq=1$.
Thus $(ap+bq)cdot x=x$. But $(ap+bq)cdot x=acdot(pcdot x)+bcdot(qcdot x)=0$, giving $x=0$, which is not possible since $x$ has positive order in $(F,+)$.
So there is no prime other than $p$ which divides $|F|$.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
I like this argument better than the vector space one. Surprising that it has so little attention.
$endgroup$
– R R
May 7 '15 at 17:38
$begingroup$
why $(ap+bq)cdot x = a cdot (p cdot x) + b cdot (q cdot x)?$ thanks!
$endgroup$
– scitamehtam
Aug 27 '15 at 5:26
3
$begingroup$
@scitamehtam An inductive argument should easily settle that $(m+n)cdot x=mcdot x+ncdot x$ for all integers $m$ and $n$ and any $xin F$. Further, an inductive argument can be used to settle $(mn)cdot x= mcdot(ncdot x)$ for all integers $m$ and $n$ and $xin F$. I guess the source of the confusion is probably the fact that here the '$cdot$' does not denote the multiplication in $F$. It is simply a notation that if $m$ is a positive integer, then $mcdot x$ is $x$ summed $m$ times. If $m$ is negative then $mcdot x:=(-m)cdot x$. If $m=0$ then $mcdot x=0$.
$endgroup$
– caffeinemachine
Aug 27 '15 at 7:06
8
$begingroup$
After the first paragraph, can’t you just argue: In the equation $x+…+x=0$ ($q$ $x$s) factor out $x$ to get $x(1+…+1)=0$. Since we’re in a field we know that $x^{-1}$ exists so multiply it to both sides to get $1+…+1=0$ ($q$ $1$s). But we know that the order of $1$ in $(F,+)$ is $p$, hence $p|q$.
$endgroup$
– Coffee_Table
Nov 19 '17 at 0:19
1
$begingroup$
Coffee Table combined with caffeinemachine gives best result :)
$endgroup$
– Silent
Apr 5 at 12:08
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Let $F$ be a finite field. Then the underlying additive group of the field (let's denote this by $F^+$) has this interesting property:
For every two non-identity (i.e. non-zero) elements $a$ and $bin F^+$, there is an automorphism $phi$ of the additive group such that $phi(a)=b$.
This can be seen by examining the map $(xmapsto ba^{-1}x)$.
This means the set of automorphisms of $F^+$ act transitively on $F^+$. Since automorphisms permute elements of the same order, we can conclude that every element in $F$ has the same order.
But a finite group in which all non-identity elements have the same order is necessarily a $p$-group such that every element has prime order. This can be shown by Cauchy's Theorem.
Suppose the order of $F^+$ had two distinct prime factors $p$ and $q$. Then $F^+$ would contain an element of order $p$ and another element of order $q$ by Cauchy's Theorem. This contradicts that every element has the same order. So the order of $F$ is indeed a prime-power. Cauchy's Theorem implies that $F$ has an element of order $p$, thus all elements have order $p$ by the hypothesis.
So, $F$ must be of prime-power order $p^n$, and we have that $px=0$ for all $xin F$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First note that if $R$ is a commutative ring with identity then there exists a ring homomorphism from $Bbb Z$ to $R$ given by $1 mapsto 1_R$ having kernel $n Bbb Z$ for $n ge 0$. If $R$ is a field then the kernel would be ${0 }$ or $p Bbb Z$ for $p$ a prime. Hence the characteristic of a field is either $0$ or $p$ for $p$ a prime. Now let $R=F$ be a finite field. Consider a map $f : Bbb Z longrightarrow F$ as above. Then $f$ is a homomorphism. Since $F$ is finite $f$ cannot be one-one; for otherwise there will be a copy of $Bbb Z$ sitting inside $F$. But then $F$ will be of infinite order, a contradiction. Hence $Ker (f) ne {0 }$. Since $F$ is a field $Ker (f) = p Bbb Z$ for some prime number $p$. Then $Bbb Z/ p Bbb Z$ is embedded in $F$. So $F$ can be thought of as a vector space over $Bbb Z / p Bbb Z$. Since $F$ is finite, then dimension of $F$ as a vector space over $Bbb Z / p Bbb Z$ is finite. Lets say the dimension to be $n$. Then $|F| = p^n$. This proves that the order of any field is some power $n$ of a prime say $p$.
QED
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A slight variation on caffeinmachine's answer that I prefer, because I think it shows more of the structure of what's going on:
Let $F$ be a finite field (and thus has characteristic $p$, a prime).
- Every element of $F$ has order $p$ in the additive group $(F,+)$. So $(F,+)$ is a $p$-group.
- A group is a $p$-group iff it has order $p^n$ for some positive integer $n$.
The first claim is immediate, by the distributive property of the field. Let $x in F, x neq 0_F$. We have
begin{align}
p cdot x &= p cdot (1_{F} x) = (p cdot 1_{F}) x
\
& = 0
end{align}
This is the smallest positive integer for which this occurs, by the definition of the characteristic of a field. So $x$ has order $p$.
The part that we need of the second claim is a well-known corollary of Cauchy's theorem (the reverse direction is just an application of Lagrange's theorem).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $n,m$ be positive integers and $F$ be a finite field. Define the operations.
begin{align}
(n cdot mathbb{1}_F) (m cdot mathbb{1}_F) &= (nm cdot mathbb{1_F})\
(-n)cdot mathbb{1}_F &= -(ncdot mathbb{1}_F)\
0 cdot mathbb{1}_F &= 0\
end{align}
This then suggests there is a natural homomorphism
begin{align}
mathbb{Z} &stackrel{phi}to F\
n &to n cdot mathbb{1}_F
end{align}
Now since $F$ is finite, it has prime characteristic $p$ and we may see that $ker phi = pmathbb{Z}$. Subsequently, we also see
$$mathbb{Z}/kerphi = mathbb{Z}/pmathbb{Z} stackrel{phi}to text{img} phi approx F_p subset F$$
and in fact $F$ is a finite extension of $F_p$ (say $[F: F_p] = n$), that is, $F_p leq F$ or in other words, $F$ is a vector space over $F_p$. So any element $z in F$ can be written as a linear combination of basis elements $(z_1, dots, z_n) subset F$ and $a_i in F_p$
$$z = a_1z_1 + dots a_nz_n$$
Now by counting, each $a_i$ has $p$ choices. So going through $n$ basis elements, there are exactly $p^n$ total choices and this counts all the $z$s in $F$. Therefore $|F| = p^n$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f72856%2forder-of-finite-fields-is-pn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Prove that the smallest multiple $m$ of 1 that gives zero has to be a prime. (Otherwise there are divisors of $m$ which are then divisors of zero.)
Prove that a field is a vector space over a subfield.
Count the elements of the field if the dimension of this vector space is $n$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Prove that the smallest multiple $m$ of 1 that gives zero has to be a prime. (Otherwise there are divisors of $m$ which are then divisors of zero.)
Prove that a field is a vector space over a subfield.
Count the elements of the field if the dimension of this vector space is $n$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Prove that the smallest multiple $m$ of 1 that gives zero has to be a prime. (Otherwise there are divisors of $m$ which are then divisors of zero.)
Prove that a field is a vector space over a subfield.
Count the elements of the field if the dimension of this vector space is $n$.
$endgroup$
Prove that the smallest multiple $m$ of 1 that gives zero has to be a prime. (Otherwise there are divisors of $m$ which are then divisors of zero.)
Prove that a field is a vector space over a subfield.
Count the elements of the field if the dimension of this vector space is $n$.
answered Oct 15 '11 at 17:52
PhiraPhira
18.6k245100
18.6k245100
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $p$ be the characteristic of a finite field $F$. Then since $1$ has order $p$ in $(F,+)$, we know that $p$ divides $|F|$. Now let $qneq p$ be any other prime dividing $|F|$. Then by Cauchy's Theorem, there is an element $xin F$ whose order in $(F,+)$ is $q$.
Then $qcdot x=0$. But we also have $pcdot x=0$. Now since $p$ and $q$ are relatively prime, we can find integers $a$ and $b$ such that $ap+bq=1$.
Thus $(ap+bq)cdot x=x$. But $(ap+bq)cdot x=acdot(pcdot x)+bcdot(qcdot x)=0$, giving $x=0$, which is not possible since $x$ has positive order in $(F,+)$.
So there is no prime other than $p$ which divides $|F|$.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
I like this argument better than the vector space one. Surprising that it has so little attention.
$endgroup$
– R R
May 7 '15 at 17:38
$begingroup$
why $(ap+bq)cdot x = a cdot (p cdot x) + b cdot (q cdot x)?$ thanks!
$endgroup$
– scitamehtam
Aug 27 '15 at 5:26
3
$begingroup$
@scitamehtam An inductive argument should easily settle that $(m+n)cdot x=mcdot x+ncdot x$ for all integers $m$ and $n$ and any $xin F$. Further, an inductive argument can be used to settle $(mn)cdot x= mcdot(ncdot x)$ for all integers $m$ and $n$ and $xin F$. I guess the source of the confusion is probably the fact that here the '$cdot$' does not denote the multiplication in $F$. It is simply a notation that if $m$ is a positive integer, then $mcdot x$ is $x$ summed $m$ times. If $m$ is negative then $mcdot x:=(-m)cdot x$. If $m=0$ then $mcdot x=0$.
$endgroup$
– caffeinemachine
Aug 27 '15 at 7:06
8
$begingroup$
After the first paragraph, can’t you just argue: In the equation $x+…+x=0$ ($q$ $x$s) factor out $x$ to get $x(1+…+1)=0$. Since we’re in a field we know that $x^{-1}$ exists so multiply it to both sides to get $1+…+1=0$ ($q$ $1$s). But we know that the order of $1$ in $(F,+)$ is $p$, hence $p|q$.
$endgroup$
– Coffee_Table
Nov 19 '17 at 0:19
1
$begingroup$
Coffee Table combined with caffeinemachine gives best result :)
$endgroup$
– Silent
Apr 5 at 12:08
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Let $p$ be the characteristic of a finite field $F$. Then since $1$ has order $p$ in $(F,+)$, we know that $p$ divides $|F|$. Now let $qneq p$ be any other prime dividing $|F|$. Then by Cauchy's Theorem, there is an element $xin F$ whose order in $(F,+)$ is $q$.
Then $qcdot x=0$. But we also have $pcdot x=0$. Now since $p$ and $q$ are relatively prime, we can find integers $a$ and $b$ such that $ap+bq=1$.
Thus $(ap+bq)cdot x=x$. But $(ap+bq)cdot x=acdot(pcdot x)+bcdot(qcdot x)=0$, giving $x=0$, which is not possible since $x$ has positive order in $(F,+)$.
So there is no prime other than $p$ which divides $|F|$.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
I like this argument better than the vector space one. Surprising that it has so little attention.
$endgroup$
– R R
May 7 '15 at 17:38
$begingroup$
why $(ap+bq)cdot x = a cdot (p cdot x) + b cdot (q cdot x)?$ thanks!
$endgroup$
– scitamehtam
Aug 27 '15 at 5:26
3
$begingroup$
@scitamehtam An inductive argument should easily settle that $(m+n)cdot x=mcdot x+ncdot x$ for all integers $m$ and $n$ and any $xin F$. Further, an inductive argument can be used to settle $(mn)cdot x= mcdot(ncdot x)$ for all integers $m$ and $n$ and $xin F$. I guess the source of the confusion is probably the fact that here the '$cdot$' does not denote the multiplication in $F$. It is simply a notation that if $m$ is a positive integer, then $mcdot x$ is $x$ summed $m$ times. If $m$ is negative then $mcdot x:=(-m)cdot x$. If $m=0$ then $mcdot x=0$.
$endgroup$
– caffeinemachine
Aug 27 '15 at 7:06
8
$begingroup$
After the first paragraph, can’t you just argue: In the equation $x+…+x=0$ ($q$ $x$s) factor out $x$ to get $x(1+…+1)=0$. Since we’re in a field we know that $x^{-1}$ exists so multiply it to both sides to get $1+…+1=0$ ($q$ $1$s). But we know that the order of $1$ in $(F,+)$ is $p$, hence $p|q$.
$endgroup$
– Coffee_Table
Nov 19 '17 at 0:19
1
$begingroup$
Coffee Table combined with caffeinemachine gives best result :)
$endgroup$
– Silent
Apr 5 at 12:08
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Let $p$ be the characteristic of a finite field $F$. Then since $1$ has order $p$ in $(F,+)$, we know that $p$ divides $|F|$. Now let $qneq p$ be any other prime dividing $|F|$. Then by Cauchy's Theorem, there is an element $xin F$ whose order in $(F,+)$ is $q$.
Then $qcdot x=0$. But we also have $pcdot x=0$. Now since $p$ and $q$ are relatively prime, we can find integers $a$ and $b$ such that $ap+bq=1$.
Thus $(ap+bq)cdot x=x$. But $(ap+bq)cdot x=acdot(pcdot x)+bcdot(qcdot x)=0$, giving $x=0$, which is not possible since $x$ has positive order in $(F,+)$.
So there is no prime other than $p$ which divides $|F|$.
$endgroup$
Let $p$ be the characteristic of a finite field $F$. Then since $1$ has order $p$ in $(F,+)$, we know that $p$ divides $|F|$. Now let $qneq p$ be any other prime dividing $|F|$. Then by Cauchy's Theorem, there is an element $xin F$ whose order in $(F,+)$ is $q$.
Then $qcdot x=0$. But we also have $pcdot x=0$. Now since $p$ and $q$ are relatively prime, we can find integers $a$ and $b$ such that $ap+bq=1$.
Thus $(ap+bq)cdot x=x$. But $(ap+bq)cdot x=acdot(pcdot x)+bcdot(qcdot x)=0$, giving $x=0$, which is not possible since $x$ has positive order in $(F,+)$.
So there is no prime other than $p$ which divides $|F|$.
answered Apr 11 '15 at 14:32
caffeinemachinecaffeinemachine
6,75121458
6,75121458
3
$begingroup$
I like this argument better than the vector space one. Surprising that it has so little attention.
$endgroup$
– R R
May 7 '15 at 17:38
$begingroup$
why $(ap+bq)cdot x = a cdot (p cdot x) + b cdot (q cdot x)?$ thanks!
$endgroup$
– scitamehtam
Aug 27 '15 at 5:26
3
$begingroup$
@scitamehtam An inductive argument should easily settle that $(m+n)cdot x=mcdot x+ncdot x$ for all integers $m$ and $n$ and any $xin F$. Further, an inductive argument can be used to settle $(mn)cdot x= mcdot(ncdot x)$ for all integers $m$ and $n$ and $xin F$. I guess the source of the confusion is probably the fact that here the '$cdot$' does not denote the multiplication in $F$. It is simply a notation that if $m$ is a positive integer, then $mcdot x$ is $x$ summed $m$ times. If $m$ is negative then $mcdot x:=(-m)cdot x$. If $m=0$ then $mcdot x=0$.
$endgroup$
– caffeinemachine
Aug 27 '15 at 7:06
8
$begingroup$
After the first paragraph, can’t you just argue: In the equation $x+…+x=0$ ($q$ $x$s) factor out $x$ to get $x(1+…+1)=0$. Since we’re in a field we know that $x^{-1}$ exists so multiply it to both sides to get $1+…+1=0$ ($q$ $1$s). But we know that the order of $1$ in $(F,+)$ is $p$, hence $p|q$.
$endgroup$
– Coffee_Table
Nov 19 '17 at 0:19
1
$begingroup$
Coffee Table combined with caffeinemachine gives best result :)
$endgroup$
– Silent
Apr 5 at 12:08
|
show 2 more comments
3
$begingroup$
I like this argument better than the vector space one. Surprising that it has so little attention.
$endgroup$
– R R
May 7 '15 at 17:38
$begingroup$
why $(ap+bq)cdot x = a cdot (p cdot x) + b cdot (q cdot x)?$ thanks!
$endgroup$
– scitamehtam
Aug 27 '15 at 5:26
3
$begingroup$
@scitamehtam An inductive argument should easily settle that $(m+n)cdot x=mcdot x+ncdot x$ for all integers $m$ and $n$ and any $xin F$. Further, an inductive argument can be used to settle $(mn)cdot x= mcdot(ncdot x)$ for all integers $m$ and $n$ and $xin F$. I guess the source of the confusion is probably the fact that here the '$cdot$' does not denote the multiplication in $F$. It is simply a notation that if $m$ is a positive integer, then $mcdot x$ is $x$ summed $m$ times. If $m$ is negative then $mcdot x:=(-m)cdot x$. If $m=0$ then $mcdot x=0$.
$endgroup$
– caffeinemachine
Aug 27 '15 at 7:06
8
$begingroup$
After the first paragraph, can’t you just argue: In the equation $x+…+x=0$ ($q$ $x$s) factor out $x$ to get $x(1+…+1)=0$. Since we’re in a field we know that $x^{-1}$ exists so multiply it to both sides to get $1+…+1=0$ ($q$ $1$s). But we know that the order of $1$ in $(F,+)$ is $p$, hence $p|q$.
$endgroup$
– Coffee_Table
Nov 19 '17 at 0:19
1
$begingroup$
Coffee Table combined with caffeinemachine gives best result :)
$endgroup$
– Silent
Apr 5 at 12:08
3
3
$begingroup$
I like this argument better than the vector space one. Surprising that it has so little attention.
$endgroup$
– R R
May 7 '15 at 17:38
$begingroup$
I like this argument better than the vector space one. Surprising that it has so little attention.
$endgroup$
– R R
May 7 '15 at 17:38
$begingroup$
why $(ap+bq)cdot x = a cdot (p cdot x) + b cdot (q cdot x)?$ thanks!
$endgroup$
– scitamehtam
Aug 27 '15 at 5:26
$begingroup$
why $(ap+bq)cdot x = a cdot (p cdot x) + b cdot (q cdot x)?$ thanks!
$endgroup$
– scitamehtam
Aug 27 '15 at 5:26
3
3
$begingroup$
@scitamehtam An inductive argument should easily settle that $(m+n)cdot x=mcdot x+ncdot x$ for all integers $m$ and $n$ and any $xin F$. Further, an inductive argument can be used to settle $(mn)cdot x= mcdot(ncdot x)$ for all integers $m$ and $n$ and $xin F$. I guess the source of the confusion is probably the fact that here the '$cdot$' does not denote the multiplication in $F$. It is simply a notation that if $m$ is a positive integer, then $mcdot x$ is $x$ summed $m$ times. If $m$ is negative then $mcdot x:=(-m)cdot x$. If $m=0$ then $mcdot x=0$.
$endgroup$
– caffeinemachine
Aug 27 '15 at 7:06
$begingroup$
@scitamehtam An inductive argument should easily settle that $(m+n)cdot x=mcdot x+ncdot x$ for all integers $m$ and $n$ and any $xin F$. Further, an inductive argument can be used to settle $(mn)cdot x= mcdot(ncdot x)$ for all integers $m$ and $n$ and $xin F$. I guess the source of the confusion is probably the fact that here the '$cdot$' does not denote the multiplication in $F$. It is simply a notation that if $m$ is a positive integer, then $mcdot x$ is $x$ summed $m$ times. If $m$ is negative then $mcdot x:=(-m)cdot x$. If $m=0$ then $mcdot x=0$.
$endgroup$
– caffeinemachine
Aug 27 '15 at 7:06
8
8
$begingroup$
After the first paragraph, can’t you just argue: In the equation $x+…+x=0$ ($q$ $x$s) factor out $x$ to get $x(1+…+1)=0$. Since we’re in a field we know that $x^{-1}$ exists so multiply it to both sides to get $1+…+1=0$ ($q$ $1$s). But we know that the order of $1$ in $(F,+)$ is $p$, hence $p|q$.
$endgroup$
– Coffee_Table
Nov 19 '17 at 0:19
$begingroup$
After the first paragraph, can’t you just argue: In the equation $x+…+x=0$ ($q$ $x$s) factor out $x$ to get $x(1+…+1)=0$. Since we’re in a field we know that $x^{-1}$ exists so multiply it to both sides to get $1+…+1=0$ ($q$ $1$s). But we know that the order of $1$ in $(F,+)$ is $p$, hence $p|q$.
$endgroup$
– Coffee_Table
Nov 19 '17 at 0:19
1
1
$begingroup$
Coffee Table combined with caffeinemachine gives best result :)
$endgroup$
– Silent
Apr 5 at 12:08
$begingroup$
Coffee Table combined with caffeinemachine gives best result :)
$endgroup$
– Silent
Apr 5 at 12:08
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Let $F$ be a finite field. Then the underlying additive group of the field (let's denote this by $F^+$) has this interesting property:
For every two non-identity (i.e. non-zero) elements $a$ and $bin F^+$, there is an automorphism $phi$ of the additive group such that $phi(a)=b$.
This can be seen by examining the map $(xmapsto ba^{-1}x)$.
This means the set of automorphisms of $F^+$ act transitively on $F^+$. Since automorphisms permute elements of the same order, we can conclude that every element in $F$ has the same order.
But a finite group in which all non-identity elements have the same order is necessarily a $p$-group such that every element has prime order. This can be shown by Cauchy's Theorem.
Suppose the order of $F^+$ had two distinct prime factors $p$ and $q$. Then $F^+$ would contain an element of order $p$ and another element of order $q$ by Cauchy's Theorem. This contradicts that every element has the same order. So the order of $F$ is indeed a prime-power. Cauchy's Theorem implies that $F$ has an element of order $p$, thus all elements have order $p$ by the hypothesis.
So, $F$ must be of prime-power order $p^n$, and we have that $px=0$ for all $xin F$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $F$ be a finite field. Then the underlying additive group of the field (let's denote this by $F^+$) has this interesting property:
For every two non-identity (i.e. non-zero) elements $a$ and $bin F^+$, there is an automorphism $phi$ of the additive group such that $phi(a)=b$.
This can be seen by examining the map $(xmapsto ba^{-1}x)$.
This means the set of automorphisms of $F^+$ act transitively on $F^+$. Since automorphisms permute elements of the same order, we can conclude that every element in $F$ has the same order.
But a finite group in which all non-identity elements have the same order is necessarily a $p$-group such that every element has prime order. This can be shown by Cauchy's Theorem.
Suppose the order of $F^+$ had two distinct prime factors $p$ and $q$. Then $F^+$ would contain an element of order $p$ and another element of order $q$ by Cauchy's Theorem. This contradicts that every element has the same order. So the order of $F$ is indeed a prime-power. Cauchy's Theorem implies that $F$ has an element of order $p$, thus all elements have order $p$ by the hypothesis.
So, $F$ must be of prime-power order $p^n$, and we have that $px=0$ for all $xin F$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $F$ be a finite field. Then the underlying additive group of the field (let's denote this by $F^+$) has this interesting property:
For every two non-identity (i.e. non-zero) elements $a$ and $bin F^+$, there is an automorphism $phi$ of the additive group such that $phi(a)=b$.
This can be seen by examining the map $(xmapsto ba^{-1}x)$.
This means the set of automorphisms of $F^+$ act transitively on $F^+$. Since automorphisms permute elements of the same order, we can conclude that every element in $F$ has the same order.
But a finite group in which all non-identity elements have the same order is necessarily a $p$-group such that every element has prime order. This can be shown by Cauchy's Theorem.
Suppose the order of $F^+$ had two distinct prime factors $p$ and $q$. Then $F^+$ would contain an element of order $p$ and another element of order $q$ by Cauchy's Theorem. This contradicts that every element has the same order. So the order of $F$ is indeed a prime-power. Cauchy's Theorem implies that $F$ has an element of order $p$, thus all elements have order $p$ by the hypothesis.
So, $F$ must be of prime-power order $p^n$, and we have that $px=0$ for all $xin F$.
$endgroup$
Let $F$ be a finite field. Then the underlying additive group of the field (let's denote this by $F^+$) has this interesting property:
For every two non-identity (i.e. non-zero) elements $a$ and $bin F^+$, there is an automorphism $phi$ of the additive group such that $phi(a)=b$.
This can be seen by examining the map $(xmapsto ba^{-1}x)$.
This means the set of automorphisms of $F^+$ act transitively on $F^+$. Since automorphisms permute elements of the same order, we can conclude that every element in $F$ has the same order.
But a finite group in which all non-identity elements have the same order is necessarily a $p$-group such that every element has prime order. This can be shown by Cauchy's Theorem.
Suppose the order of $F^+$ had two distinct prime factors $p$ and $q$. Then $F^+$ would contain an element of order $p$ and another element of order $q$ by Cauchy's Theorem. This contradicts that every element has the same order. So the order of $F$ is indeed a prime-power. Cauchy's Theorem implies that $F$ has an element of order $p$, thus all elements have order $p$ by the hypothesis.
So, $F$ must be of prime-power order $p^n$, and we have that $px=0$ for all $xin F$.
answered Aug 1 '14 at 19:29
Robert WolfeRobert Wolfe
6,01922763
6,01922763
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First note that if $R$ is a commutative ring with identity then there exists a ring homomorphism from $Bbb Z$ to $R$ given by $1 mapsto 1_R$ having kernel $n Bbb Z$ for $n ge 0$. If $R$ is a field then the kernel would be ${0 }$ or $p Bbb Z$ for $p$ a prime. Hence the characteristic of a field is either $0$ or $p$ for $p$ a prime. Now let $R=F$ be a finite field. Consider a map $f : Bbb Z longrightarrow F$ as above. Then $f$ is a homomorphism. Since $F$ is finite $f$ cannot be one-one; for otherwise there will be a copy of $Bbb Z$ sitting inside $F$. But then $F$ will be of infinite order, a contradiction. Hence $Ker (f) ne {0 }$. Since $F$ is a field $Ker (f) = p Bbb Z$ for some prime number $p$. Then $Bbb Z/ p Bbb Z$ is embedded in $F$. So $F$ can be thought of as a vector space over $Bbb Z / p Bbb Z$. Since $F$ is finite, then dimension of $F$ as a vector space over $Bbb Z / p Bbb Z$ is finite. Lets say the dimension to be $n$. Then $|F| = p^n$. This proves that the order of any field is some power $n$ of a prime say $p$.
QED
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First note that if $R$ is a commutative ring with identity then there exists a ring homomorphism from $Bbb Z$ to $R$ given by $1 mapsto 1_R$ having kernel $n Bbb Z$ for $n ge 0$. If $R$ is a field then the kernel would be ${0 }$ or $p Bbb Z$ for $p$ a prime. Hence the characteristic of a field is either $0$ or $p$ for $p$ a prime. Now let $R=F$ be a finite field. Consider a map $f : Bbb Z longrightarrow F$ as above. Then $f$ is a homomorphism. Since $F$ is finite $f$ cannot be one-one; for otherwise there will be a copy of $Bbb Z$ sitting inside $F$. But then $F$ will be of infinite order, a contradiction. Hence $Ker (f) ne {0 }$. Since $F$ is a field $Ker (f) = p Bbb Z$ for some prime number $p$. Then $Bbb Z/ p Bbb Z$ is embedded in $F$. So $F$ can be thought of as a vector space over $Bbb Z / p Bbb Z$. Since $F$ is finite, then dimension of $F$ as a vector space over $Bbb Z / p Bbb Z$ is finite. Lets say the dimension to be $n$. Then $|F| = p^n$. This proves that the order of any field is some power $n$ of a prime say $p$.
QED
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First note that if $R$ is a commutative ring with identity then there exists a ring homomorphism from $Bbb Z$ to $R$ given by $1 mapsto 1_R$ having kernel $n Bbb Z$ for $n ge 0$. If $R$ is a field then the kernel would be ${0 }$ or $p Bbb Z$ for $p$ a prime. Hence the characteristic of a field is either $0$ or $p$ for $p$ a prime. Now let $R=F$ be a finite field. Consider a map $f : Bbb Z longrightarrow F$ as above. Then $f$ is a homomorphism. Since $F$ is finite $f$ cannot be one-one; for otherwise there will be a copy of $Bbb Z$ sitting inside $F$. But then $F$ will be of infinite order, a contradiction. Hence $Ker (f) ne {0 }$. Since $F$ is a field $Ker (f) = p Bbb Z$ for some prime number $p$. Then $Bbb Z/ p Bbb Z$ is embedded in $F$. So $F$ can be thought of as a vector space over $Bbb Z / p Bbb Z$. Since $F$ is finite, then dimension of $F$ as a vector space over $Bbb Z / p Bbb Z$ is finite. Lets say the dimension to be $n$. Then $|F| = p^n$. This proves that the order of any field is some power $n$ of a prime say $p$.
QED
$endgroup$
First note that if $R$ is a commutative ring with identity then there exists a ring homomorphism from $Bbb Z$ to $R$ given by $1 mapsto 1_R$ having kernel $n Bbb Z$ for $n ge 0$. If $R$ is a field then the kernel would be ${0 }$ or $p Bbb Z$ for $p$ a prime. Hence the characteristic of a field is either $0$ or $p$ for $p$ a prime. Now let $R=F$ be a finite field. Consider a map $f : Bbb Z longrightarrow F$ as above. Then $f$ is a homomorphism. Since $F$ is finite $f$ cannot be one-one; for otherwise there will be a copy of $Bbb Z$ sitting inside $F$. But then $F$ will be of infinite order, a contradiction. Hence $Ker (f) ne {0 }$. Since $F$ is a field $Ker (f) = p Bbb Z$ for some prime number $p$. Then $Bbb Z/ p Bbb Z$ is embedded in $F$. So $F$ can be thought of as a vector space over $Bbb Z / p Bbb Z$. Since $F$ is finite, then dimension of $F$ as a vector space over $Bbb Z / p Bbb Z$ is finite. Lets say the dimension to be $n$. Then $|F| = p^n$. This proves that the order of any field is some power $n$ of a prime say $p$.
QED
answered Jan 9 at 6:32
Dbchatto67Dbchatto67
3,185625
3,185625
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A slight variation on caffeinmachine's answer that I prefer, because I think it shows more of the structure of what's going on:
Let $F$ be a finite field (and thus has characteristic $p$, a prime).
- Every element of $F$ has order $p$ in the additive group $(F,+)$. So $(F,+)$ is a $p$-group.
- A group is a $p$-group iff it has order $p^n$ for some positive integer $n$.
The first claim is immediate, by the distributive property of the field. Let $x in F, x neq 0_F$. We have
begin{align}
p cdot x &= p cdot (1_{F} x) = (p cdot 1_{F}) x
\
& = 0
end{align}
This is the smallest positive integer for which this occurs, by the definition of the characteristic of a field. So $x$ has order $p$.
The part that we need of the second claim is a well-known corollary of Cauchy's theorem (the reverse direction is just an application of Lagrange's theorem).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A slight variation on caffeinmachine's answer that I prefer, because I think it shows more of the structure of what's going on:
Let $F$ be a finite field (and thus has characteristic $p$, a prime).
- Every element of $F$ has order $p$ in the additive group $(F,+)$. So $(F,+)$ is a $p$-group.
- A group is a $p$-group iff it has order $p^n$ for some positive integer $n$.
The first claim is immediate, by the distributive property of the field. Let $x in F, x neq 0_F$. We have
begin{align}
p cdot x &= p cdot (1_{F} x) = (p cdot 1_{F}) x
\
& = 0
end{align}
This is the smallest positive integer for which this occurs, by the definition of the characteristic of a field. So $x$ has order $p$.
The part that we need of the second claim is a well-known corollary of Cauchy's theorem (the reverse direction is just an application of Lagrange's theorem).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A slight variation on caffeinmachine's answer that I prefer, because I think it shows more of the structure of what's going on:
Let $F$ be a finite field (and thus has characteristic $p$, a prime).
- Every element of $F$ has order $p$ in the additive group $(F,+)$. So $(F,+)$ is a $p$-group.
- A group is a $p$-group iff it has order $p^n$ for some positive integer $n$.
The first claim is immediate, by the distributive property of the field. Let $x in F, x neq 0_F$. We have
begin{align}
p cdot x &= p cdot (1_{F} x) = (p cdot 1_{F}) x
\
& = 0
end{align}
This is the smallest positive integer for which this occurs, by the definition of the characteristic of a field. So $x$ has order $p$.
The part that we need of the second claim is a well-known corollary of Cauchy's theorem (the reverse direction is just an application of Lagrange's theorem).
$endgroup$
A slight variation on caffeinmachine's answer that I prefer, because I think it shows more of the structure of what's going on:
Let $F$ be a finite field (and thus has characteristic $p$, a prime).
- Every element of $F$ has order $p$ in the additive group $(F,+)$. So $(F,+)$ is a $p$-group.
- A group is a $p$-group iff it has order $p^n$ for some positive integer $n$.
The first claim is immediate, by the distributive property of the field. Let $x in F, x neq 0_F$. We have
begin{align}
p cdot x &= p cdot (1_{F} x) = (p cdot 1_{F}) x
\
& = 0
end{align}
This is the smallest positive integer for which this occurs, by the definition of the characteristic of a field. So $x$ has order $p$.
The part that we need of the second claim is a well-known corollary of Cauchy's theorem (the reverse direction is just an application of Lagrange's theorem).
answered Jul 9 '18 at 10:13
Jonathan RaynerJonathan Rayner
164112
164112
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $n,m$ be positive integers and $F$ be a finite field. Define the operations.
begin{align}
(n cdot mathbb{1}_F) (m cdot mathbb{1}_F) &= (nm cdot mathbb{1_F})\
(-n)cdot mathbb{1}_F &= -(ncdot mathbb{1}_F)\
0 cdot mathbb{1}_F &= 0\
end{align}
This then suggests there is a natural homomorphism
begin{align}
mathbb{Z} &stackrel{phi}to F\
n &to n cdot mathbb{1}_F
end{align}
Now since $F$ is finite, it has prime characteristic $p$ and we may see that $ker phi = pmathbb{Z}$. Subsequently, we also see
$$mathbb{Z}/kerphi = mathbb{Z}/pmathbb{Z} stackrel{phi}to text{img} phi approx F_p subset F$$
and in fact $F$ is a finite extension of $F_p$ (say $[F: F_p] = n$), that is, $F_p leq F$ or in other words, $F$ is a vector space over $F_p$. So any element $z in F$ can be written as a linear combination of basis elements $(z_1, dots, z_n) subset F$ and $a_i in F_p$
$$z = a_1z_1 + dots a_nz_n$$
Now by counting, each $a_i$ has $p$ choices. So going through $n$ basis elements, there are exactly $p^n$ total choices and this counts all the $z$s in $F$. Therefore $|F| = p^n$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $n,m$ be positive integers and $F$ be a finite field. Define the operations.
begin{align}
(n cdot mathbb{1}_F) (m cdot mathbb{1}_F) &= (nm cdot mathbb{1_F})\
(-n)cdot mathbb{1}_F &= -(ncdot mathbb{1}_F)\
0 cdot mathbb{1}_F &= 0\
end{align}
This then suggests there is a natural homomorphism
begin{align}
mathbb{Z} &stackrel{phi}to F\
n &to n cdot mathbb{1}_F
end{align}
Now since $F$ is finite, it has prime characteristic $p$ and we may see that $ker phi = pmathbb{Z}$. Subsequently, we also see
$$mathbb{Z}/kerphi = mathbb{Z}/pmathbb{Z} stackrel{phi}to text{img} phi approx F_p subset F$$
and in fact $F$ is a finite extension of $F_p$ (say $[F: F_p] = n$), that is, $F_p leq F$ or in other words, $F$ is a vector space over $F_p$. So any element $z in F$ can be written as a linear combination of basis elements $(z_1, dots, z_n) subset F$ and $a_i in F_p$
$$z = a_1z_1 + dots a_nz_n$$
Now by counting, each $a_i$ has $p$ choices. So going through $n$ basis elements, there are exactly $p^n$ total choices and this counts all the $z$s in $F$. Therefore $|F| = p^n$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $n,m$ be positive integers and $F$ be a finite field. Define the operations.
begin{align}
(n cdot mathbb{1}_F) (m cdot mathbb{1}_F) &= (nm cdot mathbb{1_F})\
(-n)cdot mathbb{1}_F &= -(ncdot mathbb{1}_F)\
0 cdot mathbb{1}_F &= 0\
end{align}
This then suggests there is a natural homomorphism
begin{align}
mathbb{Z} &stackrel{phi}to F\
n &to n cdot mathbb{1}_F
end{align}
Now since $F$ is finite, it has prime characteristic $p$ and we may see that $ker phi = pmathbb{Z}$. Subsequently, we also see
$$mathbb{Z}/kerphi = mathbb{Z}/pmathbb{Z} stackrel{phi}to text{img} phi approx F_p subset F$$
and in fact $F$ is a finite extension of $F_p$ (say $[F: F_p] = n$), that is, $F_p leq F$ or in other words, $F$ is a vector space over $F_p$. So any element $z in F$ can be written as a linear combination of basis elements $(z_1, dots, z_n) subset F$ and $a_i in F_p$
$$z = a_1z_1 + dots a_nz_n$$
Now by counting, each $a_i$ has $p$ choices. So going through $n$ basis elements, there are exactly $p^n$ total choices and this counts all the $z$s in $F$. Therefore $|F| = p^n$
$endgroup$
Let $n,m$ be positive integers and $F$ be a finite field. Define the operations.
begin{align}
(n cdot mathbb{1}_F) (m cdot mathbb{1}_F) &= (nm cdot mathbb{1_F})\
(-n)cdot mathbb{1}_F &= -(ncdot mathbb{1}_F)\
0 cdot mathbb{1}_F &= 0\
end{align}
This then suggests there is a natural homomorphism
begin{align}
mathbb{Z} &stackrel{phi}to F\
n &to n cdot mathbb{1}_F
end{align}
Now since $F$ is finite, it has prime characteristic $p$ and we may see that $ker phi = pmathbb{Z}$. Subsequently, we also see
$$mathbb{Z}/kerphi = mathbb{Z}/pmathbb{Z} stackrel{phi}to text{img} phi approx F_p subset F$$
and in fact $F$ is a finite extension of $F_p$ (say $[F: F_p] = n$), that is, $F_p leq F$ or in other words, $F$ is a vector space over $F_p$. So any element $z in F$ can be written as a linear combination of basis elements $(z_1, dots, z_n) subset F$ and $a_i in F_p$
$$z = a_1z_1 + dots a_nz_n$$
Now by counting, each $a_i$ has $p$ choices. So going through $n$ basis elements, there are exactly $p^n$ total choices and this counts all the $z$s in $F$. Therefore $|F| = p^n$
answered Feb 17 at 6:03
IAmNoOneIAmNoOne
2,65541221
2,65541221
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f72856%2forder-of-finite-fields-is-pn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
$begingroup$
What is the cardinality of any finite-dimensional vector space over the field with $p$ elements?
$endgroup$
– NKS
Oct 15 '11 at 17:50
$begingroup$
What exactly is the scalar field and the multiplication law?
$endgroup$
– Mohan
Oct 15 '11 at 18:14
$begingroup$
The scalar field is the subfield consisting of the elements $0$, $1$, $1+1$, $1+1+1$, $1+1+1+1$ and so forth. (You first have to prove this is in fact a subfield, of course). Multiplication is whatever passes for multiplication in the finite field.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Oct 15 '11 at 18:37
$begingroup$
First prove that if $charF=p $ then $F_p$ is a subfield of $F$.
$endgroup$
– Frank Murphy
Oct 15 '11 at 19:27
$begingroup$
The answers to this question contain all the information that you need. IOW this is almost an exact duplicate.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Oct 16 '11 at 6:17