Linear dependence as a binary relation
$begingroup$
Elements $a$ and $b$ from an $R$-module $M$ are linearly dependent if there are scalars $x$, $y$ in $R$, $x neq 0$ or $y neq 0$, such that $xa = yb$.
Let $M$ be a torsion-free module over an integral domain $R$.
In this case the binary relation has the following properties:
1. It is an equivalence relation on nonzero elements of $M$;
2. Each equivalence class combined with the zero element is a submodule of $M$.
Let's call the submodule an axis of module $M$.
Clearly, if $M$ is a free module over a principal ideal domain, all the axes are lines isomorphic to $R$ over itself.
But what if $M$ is not a free module or $R$ is not a PID?
There is an example of a torsion-free module over an integral domain where the only axis is the module itself, and it is not a line: $langle 2,x rangle$ over $mathbb{Z}[x]$ (Show that $langle 2,x rangle$ is not a principal ideal in $mathbb Z [x]$).
Questions:
1. Are the axes of a torsion-free module over an integral domain isomorphic to each other?
2. Are the axes of a free module over an integral domain lines?
3. If an axis $A$ of a free module over an integral domain is a line, is there a direct sum decomposition $M = A oplus M'$?
abstract-algebra modules direct-sum free-modules
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Elements $a$ and $b$ from an $R$-module $M$ are linearly dependent if there are scalars $x$, $y$ in $R$, $x neq 0$ or $y neq 0$, such that $xa = yb$.
Let $M$ be a torsion-free module over an integral domain $R$.
In this case the binary relation has the following properties:
1. It is an equivalence relation on nonzero elements of $M$;
2. Each equivalence class combined with the zero element is a submodule of $M$.
Let's call the submodule an axis of module $M$.
Clearly, if $M$ is a free module over a principal ideal domain, all the axes are lines isomorphic to $R$ over itself.
But what if $M$ is not a free module or $R$ is not a PID?
There is an example of a torsion-free module over an integral domain where the only axis is the module itself, and it is not a line: $langle 2,x rangle$ over $mathbb{Z}[x]$ (Show that $langle 2,x rangle$ is not a principal ideal in $mathbb Z [x]$).
Questions:
1. Are the axes of a torsion-free module over an integral domain isomorphic to each other?
2. Are the axes of a free module over an integral domain lines?
3. If an axis $A$ of a free module over an integral domain is a line, is there a direct sum decomposition $M = A oplus M'$?
abstract-algebra modules direct-sum free-modules
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What do you call a "line" in the second question?
$endgroup$
– lisyarus
Feb 10 at 23:06
$begingroup$
@lisyarus: By line I mean a free module of rank 1.
$endgroup$
– Alex C
Feb 10 at 23:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Elements $a$ and $b$ from an $R$-module $M$ are linearly dependent if there are scalars $x$, $y$ in $R$, $x neq 0$ or $y neq 0$, such that $xa = yb$.
Let $M$ be a torsion-free module over an integral domain $R$.
In this case the binary relation has the following properties:
1. It is an equivalence relation on nonzero elements of $M$;
2. Each equivalence class combined with the zero element is a submodule of $M$.
Let's call the submodule an axis of module $M$.
Clearly, if $M$ is a free module over a principal ideal domain, all the axes are lines isomorphic to $R$ over itself.
But what if $M$ is not a free module or $R$ is not a PID?
There is an example of a torsion-free module over an integral domain where the only axis is the module itself, and it is not a line: $langle 2,x rangle$ over $mathbb{Z}[x]$ (Show that $langle 2,x rangle$ is not a principal ideal in $mathbb Z [x]$).
Questions:
1. Are the axes of a torsion-free module over an integral domain isomorphic to each other?
2. Are the axes of a free module over an integral domain lines?
3. If an axis $A$ of a free module over an integral domain is a line, is there a direct sum decomposition $M = A oplus M'$?
abstract-algebra modules direct-sum free-modules
$endgroup$
Elements $a$ and $b$ from an $R$-module $M$ are linearly dependent if there are scalars $x$, $y$ in $R$, $x neq 0$ or $y neq 0$, such that $xa = yb$.
Let $M$ be a torsion-free module over an integral domain $R$.
In this case the binary relation has the following properties:
1. It is an equivalence relation on nonzero elements of $M$;
2. Each equivalence class combined with the zero element is a submodule of $M$.
Let's call the submodule an axis of module $M$.
Clearly, if $M$ is a free module over a principal ideal domain, all the axes are lines isomorphic to $R$ over itself.
But what if $M$ is not a free module or $R$ is not a PID?
There is an example of a torsion-free module over an integral domain where the only axis is the module itself, and it is not a line: $langle 2,x rangle$ over $mathbb{Z}[x]$ (Show that $langle 2,x rangle$ is not a principal ideal in $mathbb Z [x]$).
Questions:
1. Are the axes of a torsion-free module over an integral domain isomorphic to each other?
2. Are the axes of a free module over an integral domain lines?
3. If an axis $A$ of a free module over an integral domain is a line, is there a direct sum decomposition $M = A oplus M'$?
abstract-algebra modules direct-sum free-modules
abstract-algebra modules direct-sum free-modules
edited Feb 22 at 10:53
Alex C
asked Jan 9 at 6:56
Alex CAlex C
10718
10718
$begingroup$
What do you call a "line" in the second question?
$endgroup$
– lisyarus
Feb 10 at 23:06
$begingroup$
@lisyarus: By line I mean a free module of rank 1.
$endgroup$
– Alex C
Feb 10 at 23:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What do you call a "line" in the second question?
$endgroup$
– lisyarus
Feb 10 at 23:06
$begingroup$
@lisyarus: By line I mean a free module of rank 1.
$endgroup$
– Alex C
Feb 10 at 23:10
$begingroup$
What do you call a "line" in the second question?
$endgroup$
– lisyarus
Feb 10 at 23:06
$begingroup$
What do you call a "line" in the second question?
$endgroup$
– lisyarus
Feb 10 at 23:06
$begingroup$
@lisyarus: By line I mean a free module of rank 1.
$endgroup$
– Alex C
Feb 10 at 23:10
$begingroup$
@lisyarus: By line I mean a free module of rank 1.
$endgroup$
– Alex C
Feb 10 at 23:10
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It looks like the answer to the first question is negative:
in $mathbb{Z} times mathbb{R}$ over $mathbb{Z}$ axis $mathbb{Z}$ is not isomorphic to axis $mathbb{R}$.
Trying to find a counterexample for the second question.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
$mathbb R$ is not an axis: e.g. $sqrt 2$ and $sqrt 3$ are linearly independent over $mathbb Z$.
$endgroup$
– lisyarus
Feb 10 at 23:01
1
$begingroup$
On the other hand, in $mathbb Z times mathbb Q$ the $mathbb Q$ part is an axis, providing a counterexample.
$endgroup$
– lisyarus
Feb 10 at 23:06
$begingroup$
@lisyarus: Yes, you are right. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– Alex C
Feb 10 at 23:13
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3067165%2flinear-dependence-as-a-binary-relation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It looks like the answer to the first question is negative:
in $mathbb{Z} times mathbb{R}$ over $mathbb{Z}$ axis $mathbb{Z}$ is not isomorphic to axis $mathbb{R}$.
Trying to find a counterexample for the second question.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
$mathbb R$ is not an axis: e.g. $sqrt 2$ and $sqrt 3$ are linearly independent over $mathbb Z$.
$endgroup$
– lisyarus
Feb 10 at 23:01
1
$begingroup$
On the other hand, in $mathbb Z times mathbb Q$ the $mathbb Q$ part is an axis, providing a counterexample.
$endgroup$
– lisyarus
Feb 10 at 23:06
$begingroup$
@lisyarus: Yes, you are right. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– Alex C
Feb 10 at 23:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It looks like the answer to the first question is negative:
in $mathbb{Z} times mathbb{R}$ over $mathbb{Z}$ axis $mathbb{Z}$ is not isomorphic to axis $mathbb{R}$.
Trying to find a counterexample for the second question.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
$mathbb R$ is not an axis: e.g. $sqrt 2$ and $sqrt 3$ are linearly independent over $mathbb Z$.
$endgroup$
– lisyarus
Feb 10 at 23:01
1
$begingroup$
On the other hand, in $mathbb Z times mathbb Q$ the $mathbb Q$ part is an axis, providing a counterexample.
$endgroup$
– lisyarus
Feb 10 at 23:06
$begingroup$
@lisyarus: Yes, you are right. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– Alex C
Feb 10 at 23:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It looks like the answer to the first question is negative:
in $mathbb{Z} times mathbb{R}$ over $mathbb{Z}$ axis $mathbb{Z}$ is not isomorphic to axis $mathbb{R}$.
Trying to find a counterexample for the second question.
$endgroup$
It looks like the answer to the first question is negative:
in $mathbb{Z} times mathbb{R}$ over $mathbb{Z}$ axis $mathbb{Z}$ is not isomorphic to axis $mathbb{R}$.
Trying to find a counterexample for the second question.
answered Jan 11 at 23:06
Alex CAlex C
10718
10718
$begingroup$
$mathbb R$ is not an axis: e.g. $sqrt 2$ and $sqrt 3$ are linearly independent over $mathbb Z$.
$endgroup$
– lisyarus
Feb 10 at 23:01
1
$begingroup$
On the other hand, in $mathbb Z times mathbb Q$ the $mathbb Q$ part is an axis, providing a counterexample.
$endgroup$
– lisyarus
Feb 10 at 23:06
$begingroup$
@lisyarus: Yes, you are right. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– Alex C
Feb 10 at 23:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$mathbb R$ is not an axis: e.g. $sqrt 2$ and $sqrt 3$ are linearly independent over $mathbb Z$.
$endgroup$
– lisyarus
Feb 10 at 23:01
1
$begingroup$
On the other hand, in $mathbb Z times mathbb Q$ the $mathbb Q$ part is an axis, providing a counterexample.
$endgroup$
– lisyarus
Feb 10 at 23:06
$begingroup$
@lisyarus: Yes, you are right. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– Alex C
Feb 10 at 23:13
$begingroup$
$mathbb R$ is not an axis: e.g. $sqrt 2$ and $sqrt 3$ are linearly independent over $mathbb Z$.
$endgroup$
– lisyarus
Feb 10 at 23:01
$begingroup$
$mathbb R$ is not an axis: e.g. $sqrt 2$ and $sqrt 3$ are linearly independent over $mathbb Z$.
$endgroup$
– lisyarus
Feb 10 at 23:01
1
1
$begingroup$
On the other hand, in $mathbb Z times mathbb Q$ the $mathbb Q$ part is an axis, providing a counterexample.
$endgroup$
– lisyarus
Feb 10 at 23:06
$begingroup$
On the other hand, in $mathbb Z times mathbb Q$ the $mathbb Q$ part is an axis, providing a counterexample.
$endgroup$
– lisyarus
Feb 10 at 23:06
$begingroup$
@lisyarus: Yes, you are right. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– Alex C
Feb 10 at 23:13
$begingroup$
@lisyarus: Yes, you are right. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– Alex C
Feb 10 at 23:13
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3067165%2flinear-dependence-as-a-binary-relation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
What do you call a "line" in the second question?
$endgroup$
– lisyarus
Feb 10 at 23:06
$begingroup$
@lisyarus: By line I mean a free module of rank 1.
$endgroup$
– Alex C
Feb 10 at 23:10