Linear dependence as a binary relation












1












$begingroup$


Elements $a$ and $b$ from an $R$-module $M$ are linearly dependent if there are scalars $x$, $y$ in $R$, $x neq 0$ or $y neq 0$, such that $xa = yb$.



Let $M$ be a torsion-free module over an integral domain $R$.

In this case the binary relation has the following properties:

1. It is an equivalence relation on nonzero elements of $M$;

2. Each equivalence class combined with the zero element is a submodule of $M$.



Let's call the submodule an axis of module $M$.

Clearly, if $M$ is a free module over a principal ideal domain, all the axes are lines isomorphic to $R$ over itself.

But what if $M$ is not a free module or $R$ is not a PID?

There is an example of a torsion-free module over an integral domain where the only axis is the module itself, and it is not a line: $langle 2,x rangle$ over $mathbb{Z}[x]$ (Show that $langle 2,x rangle$ is not a principal ideal in $mathbb Z [x]$).



Questions:

1. Are the axes of a torsion-free module over an integral domain isomorphic to each other?

2. Are the axes of a free module over an integral domain lines?

3. If an axis $A$ of a free module over an integral domain is a line, is there a direct sum decomposition $M = A oplus M'$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What do you call a "line" in the second question?
    $endgroup$
    – lisyarus
    Feb 10 at 23:06










  • $begingroup$
    @lisyarus: By line I mean a free module of rank 1.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex C
    Feb 10 at 23:10
















1












$begingroup$


Elements $a$ and $b$ from an $R$-module $M$ are linearly dependent if there are scalars $x$, $y$ in $R$, $x neq 0$ or $y neq 0$, such that $xa = yb$.



Let $M$ be a torsion-free module over an integral domain $R$.

In this case the binary relation has the following properties:

1. It is an equivalence relation on nonzero elements of $M$;

2. Each equivalence class combined with the zero element is a submodule of $M$.



Let's call the submodule an axis of module $M$.

Clearly, if $M$ is a free module over a principal ideal domain, all the axes are lines isomorphic to $R$ over itself.

But what if $M$ is not a free module or $R$ is not a PID?

There is an example of a torsion-free module over an integral domain where the only axis is the module itself, and it is not a line: $langle 2,x rangle$ over $mathbb{Z}[x]$ (Show that $langle 2,x rangle$ is not a principal ideal in $mathbb Z [x]$).



Questions:

1. Are the axes of a torsion-free module over an integral domain isomorphic to each other?

2. Are the axes of a free module over an integral domain lines?

3. If an axis $A$ of a free module over an integral domain is a line, is there a direct sum decomposition $M = A oplus M'$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What do you call a "line" in the second question?
    $endgroup$
    – lisyarus
    Feb 10 at 23:06










  • $begingroup$
    @lisyarus: By line I mean a free module of rank 1.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex C
    Feb 10 at 23:10














1












1








1





$begingroup$


Elements $a$ and $b$ from an $R$-module $M$ are linearly dependent if there are scalars $x$, $y$ in $R$, $x neq 0$ or $y neq 0$, such that $xa = yb$.



Let $M$ be a torsion-free module over an integral domain $R$.

In this case the binary relation has the following properties:

1. It is an equivalence relation on nonzero elements of $M$;

2. Each equivalence class combined with the zero element is a submodule of $M$.



Let's call the submodule an axis of module $M$.

Clearly, if $M$ is a free module over a principal ideal domain, all the axes are lines isomorphic to $R$ over itself.

But what if $M$ is not a free module or $R$ is not a PID?

There is an example of a torsion-free module over an integral domain where the only axis is the module itself, and it is not a line: $langle 2,x rangle$ over $mathbb{Z}[x]$ (Show that $langle 2,x rangle$ is not a principal ideal in $mathbb Z [x]$).



Questions:

1. Are the axes of a torsion-free module over an integral domain isomorphic to each other?

2. Are the axes of a free module over an integral domain lines?

3. If an axis $A$ of a free module over an integral domain is a line, is there a direct sum decomposition $M = A oplus M'$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Elements $a$ and $b$ from an $R$-module $M$ are linearly dependent if there are scalars $x$, $y$ in $R$, $x neq 0$ or $y neq 0$, such that $xa = yb$.



Let $M$ be a torsion-free module over an integral domain $R$.

In this case the binary relation has the following properties:

1. It is an equivalence relation on nonzero elements of $M$;

2. Each equivalence class combined with the zero element is a submodule of $M$.



Let's call the submodule an axis of module $M$.

Clearly, if $M$ is a free module over a principal ideal domain, all the axes are lines isomorphic to $R$ over itself.

But what if $M$ is not a free module or $R$ is not a PID?

There is an example of a torsion-free module over an integral domain where the only axis is the module itself, and it is not a line: $langle 2,x rangle$ over $mathbb{Z}[x]$ (Show that $langle 2,x rangle$ is not a principal ideal in $mathbb Z [x]$).



Questions:

1. Are the axes of a torsion-free module over an integral domain isomorphic to each other?

2. Are the axes of a free module over an integral domain lines?

3. If an axis $A$ of a free module over an integral domain is a line, is there a direct sum decomposition $M = A oplus M'$?







abstract-algebra modules direct-sum free-modules






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Feb 22 at 10:53







Alex C

















asked Jan 9 at 6:56









Alex CAlex C

10718




10718












  • $begingroup$
    What do you call a "line" in the second question?
    $endgroup$
    – lisyarus
    Feb 10 at 23:06










  • $begingroup$
    @lisyarus: By line I mean a free module of rank 1.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex C
    Feb 10 at 23:10


















  • $begingroup$
    What do you call a "line" in the second question?
    $endgroup$
    – lisyarus
    Feb 10 at 23:06










  • $begingroup$
    @lisyarus: By line I mean a free module of rank 1.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex C
    Feb 10 at 23:10
















$begingroup$
What do you call a "line" in the second question?
$endgroup$
– lisyarus
Feb 10 at 23:06




$begingroup$
What do you call a "line" in the second question?
$endgroup$
– lisyarus
Feb 10 at 23:06












$begingroup$
@lisyarus: By line I mean a free module of rank 1.
$endgroup$
– Alex C
Feb 10 at 23:10




$begingroup$
@lisyarus: By line I mean a free module of rank 1.
$endgroup$
– Alex C
Feb 10 at 23:10










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

It looks like the answer to the first question is negative:

in $mathbb{Z} times mathbb{R}$ over $mathbb{Z}$ axis $mathbb{Z}$ is not isomorphic to axis $mathbb{R}$.



Trying to find a counterexample for the second question.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    $mathbb R$ is not an axis: e.g. $sqrt 2$ and $sqrt 3$ are linearly independent over $mathbb Z$.
    $endgroup$
    – lisyarus
    Feb 10 at 23:01






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    On the other hand, in $mathbb Z times mathbb Q$ the $mathbb Q$ part is an axis, providing a counterexample.
    $endgroup$
    – lisyarus
    Feb 10 at 23:06










  • $begingroup$
    @lisyarus: Yes, you are right. Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – Alex C
    Feb 10 at 23:13












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3067165%2flinear-dependence-as-a-binary-relation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

It looks like the answer to the first question is negative:

in $mathbb{Z} times mathbb{R}$ over $mathbb{Z}$ axis $mathbb{Z}$ is not isomorphic to axis $mathbb{R}$.



Trying to find a counterexample for the second question.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    $mathbb R$ is not an axis: e.g. $sqrt 2$ and $sqrt 3$ are linearly independent over $mathbb Z$.
    $endgroup$
    – lisyarus
    Feb 10 at 23:01






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    On the other hand, in $mathbb Z times mathbb Q$ the $mathbb Q$ part is an axis, providing a counterexample.
    $endgroup$
    – lisyarus
    Feb 10 at 23:06










  • $begingroup$
    @lisyarus: Yes, you are right. Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – Alex C
    Feb 10 at 23:13
















0












$begingroup$

It looks like the answer to the first question is negative:

in $mathbb{Z} times mathbb{R}$ over $mathbb{Z}$ axis $mathbb{Z}$ is not isomorphic to axis $mathbb{R}$.



Trying to find a counterexample for the second question.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    $mathbb R$ is not an axis: e.g. $sqrt 2$ and $sqrt 3$ are linearly independent over $mathbb Z$.
    $endgroup$
    – lisyarus
    Feb 10 at 23:01






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    On the other hand, in $mathbb Z times mathbb Q$ the $mathbb Q$ part is an axis, providing a counterexample.
    $endgroup$
    – lisyarus
    Feb 10 at 23:06










  • $begingroup$
    @lisyarus: Yes, you are right. Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – Alex C
    Feb 10 at 23:13














0












0








0





$begingroup$

It looks like the answer to the first question is negative:

in $mathbb{Z} times mathbb{R}$ over $mathbb{Z}$ axis $mathbb{Z}$ is not isomorphic to axis $mathbb{R}$.



Trying to find a counterexample for the second question.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



It looks like the answer to the first question is negative:

in $mathbb{Z} times mathbb{R}$ over $mathbb{Z}$ axis $mathbb{Z}$ is not isomorphic to axis $mathbb{R}$.



Trying to find a counterexample for the second question.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 11 at 23:06









Alex CAlex C

10718




10718












  • $begingroup$
    $mathbb R$ is not an axis: e.g. $sqrt 2$ and $sqrt 3$ are linearly independent over $mathbb Z$.
    $endgroup$
    – lisyarus
    Feb 10 at 23:01






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    On the other hand, in $mathbb Z times mathbb Q$ the $mathbb Q$ part is an axis, providing a counterexample.
    $endgroup$
    – lisyarus
    Feb 10 at 23:06










  • $begingroup$
    @lisyarus: Yes, you are right. Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – Alex C
    Feb 10 at 23:13


















  • $begingroup$
    $mathbb R$ is not an axis: e.g. $sqrt 2$ and $sqrt 3$ are linearly independent over $mathbb Z$.
    $endgroup$
    – lisyarus
    Feb 10 at 23:01






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    On the other hand, in $mathbb Z times mathbb Q$ the $mathbb Q$ part is an axis, providing a counterexample.
    $endgroup$
    – lisyarus
    Feb 10 at 23:06










  • $begingroup$
    @lisyarus: Yes, you are right. Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – Alex C
    Feb 10 at 23:13
















$begingroup$
$mathbb R$ is not an axis: e.g. $sqrt 2$ and $sqrt 3$ are linearly independent over $mathbb Z$.
$endgroup$
– lisyarus
Feb 10 at 23:01




$begingroup$
$mathbb R$ is not an axis: e.g. $sqrt 2$ and $sqrt 3$ are linearly independent over $mathbb Z$.
$endgroup$
– lisyarus
Feb 10 at 23:01




1




1




$begingroup$
On the other hand, in $mathbb Z times mathbb Q$ the $mathbb Q$ part is an axis, providing a counterexample.
$endgroup$
– lisyarus
Feb 10 at 23:06




$begingroup$
On the other hand, in $mathbb Z times mathbb Q$ the $mathbb Q$ part is an axis, providing a counterexample.
$endgroup$
– lisyarus
Feb 10 at 23:06












$begingroup$
@lisyarus: Yes, you are right. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– Alex C
Feb 10 at 23:13




$begingroup$
@lisyarus: Yes, you are right. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– Alex C
Feb 10 at 23:13


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3067165%2flinear-dependence-as-a-binary-relation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How do I know what Microsoft account the skydrive app is syncing to?

When does type information flow backwards in C++?

Grease: Live!