Statement of Parseval's theorem for Fourier Transform












0












$begingroup$


the following is the statement of Parseval's theorem from Wikipedia,



Suppose that $A(x)$ and $B(x)$ are two square integrable (with respect to the Lebesgue measure), complex-valued functions on $mathbb{R}$ of period $2pi$ with Fourier series
$$A(x) = sum_{n=-infty}^{infty} a_n e^{inx} $$
and
$$B(x) = sum_{n=-infty}^{infty} b_n e^{inx} $$
respectively. Then
$$sum_{n=-infty}^{infty}a_n overline{b_n} = frac{1}{2pi} int_{-pi}^{pi}A(x) overline{B(x)} dx$$
where $i$ is the imaginary unit and horizontal bars indicate complex conjugation.



I would like to know if the above statement still hold when $A(x) = sum_{n=-infty}^{infty} a_n e^{-inx} $ and $B(x) = sum_{n=-infty}^{infty} b_n e^{-inx} $. The only changes is the negative in exponential.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Sure. Just re-order the sum by replacing $n$ with $-n$.
    $endgroup$
    – DisintegratingByParts
    Jan 3 at 19:33
















0












$begingroup$


the following is the statement of Parseval's theorem from Wikipedia,



Suppose that $A(x)$ and $B(x)$ are two square integrable (with respect to the Lebesgue measure), complex-valued functions on $mathbb{R}$ of period $2pi$ with Fourier series
$$A(x) = sum_{n=-infty}^{infty} a_n e^{inx} $$
and
$$B(x) = sum_{n=-infty}^{infty} b_n e^{inx} $$
respectively. Then
$$sum_{n=-infty}^{infty}a_n overline{b_n} = frac{1}{2pi} int_{-pi}^{pi}A(x) overline{B(x)} dx$$
where $i$ is the imaginary unit and horizontal bars indicate complex conjugation.



I would like to know if the above statement still hold when $A(x) = sum_{n=-infty}^{infty} a_n e^{-inx} $ and $B(x) = sum_{n=-infty}^{infty} b_n e^{-inx} $. The only changes is the negative in exponential.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Sure. Just re-order the sum by replacing $n$ with $-n$.
    $endgroup$
    – DisintegratingByParts
    Jan 3 at 19:33














0












0








0





$begingroup$


the following is the statement of Parseval's theorem from Wikipedia,



Suppose that $A(x)$ and $B(x)$ are two square integrable (with respect to the Lebesgue measure), complex-valued functions on $mathbb{R}$ of period $2pi$ with Fourier series
$$A(x) = sum_{n=-infty}^{infty} a_n e^{inx} $$
and
$$B(x) = sum_{n=-infty}^{infty} b_n e^{inx} $$
respectively. Then
$$sum_{n=-infty}^{infty}a_n overline{b_n} = frac{1}{2pi} int_{-pi}^{pi}A(x) overline{B(x)} dx$$
where $i$ is the imaginary unit and horizontal bars indicate complex conjugation.



I would like to know if the above statement still hold when $A(x) = sum_{n=-infty}^{infty} a_n e^{-inx} $ and $B(x) = sum_{n=-infty}^{infty} b_n e^{-inx} $. The only changes is the negative in exponential.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




the following is the statement of Parseval's theorem from Wikipedia,



Suppose that $A(x)$ and $B(x)$ are two square integrable (with respect to the Lebesgue measure), complex-valued functions on $mathbb{R}$ of period $2pi$ with Fourier series
$$A(x) = sum_{n=-infty}^{infty} a_n e^{inx} $$
and
$$B(x) = sum_{n=-infty}^{infty} b_n e^{inx} $$
respectively. Then
$$sum_{n=-infty}^{infty}a_n overline{b_n} = frac{1}{2pi} int_{-pi}^{pi}A(x) overline{B(x)} dx$$
where $i$ is the imaginary unit and horizontal bars indicate complex conjugation.



I would like to know if the above statement still hold when $A(x) = sum_{n=-infty}^{infty} a_n e^{-inx} $ and $B(x) = sum_{n=-infty}^{infty} b_n e^{-inx} $. The only changes is the negative in exponential.







fourier-analysis parsevals-identity






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 3 at 19:26









Mike LMike L

1




1












  • $begingroup$
    Sure. Just re-order the sum by replacing $n$ with $-n$.
    $endgroup$
    – DisintegratingByParts
    Jan 3 at 19:33


















  • $begingroup$
    Sure. Just re-order the sum by replacing $n$ with $-n$.
    $endgroup$
    – DisintegratingByParts
    Jan 3 at 19:33
















$begingroup$
Sure. Just re-order the sum by replacing $n$ with $-n$.
$endgroup$
– DisintegratingByParts
Jan 3 at 19:33




$begingroup$
Sure. Just re-order the sum by replacing $n$ with $-n$.
$endgroup$
– DisintegratingByParts
Jan 3 at 19:33










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Yes: a possibility is to work with the functions $widetilde{A}colon xmapsto Aleft(-xright)$ and $widetilde{B}colon xmapsto Bleft(-xright)$ then do the substitution $y=-x$ in the integral.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060905%2fstatement-of-parsevals-theorem-for-fourier-transform%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    Yes: a possibility is to work with the functions $widetilde{A}colon xmapsto Aleft(-xright)$ and $widetilde{B}colon xmapsto Bleft(-xright)$ then do the substitution $y=-x$ in the integral.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      Yes: a possibility is to work with the functions $widetilde{A}colon xmapsto Aleft(-xright)$ and $widetilde{B}colon xmapsto Bleft(-xright)$ then do the substitution $y=-x$ in the integral.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Yes: a possibility is to work with the functions $widetilde{A}colon xmapsto Aleft(-xright)$ and $widetilde{B}colon xmapsto Bleft(-xright)$ then do the substitution $y=-x$ in the integral.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Yes: a possibility is to work with the functions $widetilde{A}colon xmapsto Aleft(-xright)$ and $widetilde{B}colon xmapsto Bleft(-xright)$ then do the substitution $y=-x$ in the integral.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 4 at 16:58









        Davide GiraudoDavide Giraudo

        128k17156268




        128k17156268






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060905%2fstatement-of-parsevals-theorem-for-fourier-transform%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

            Aardman Animations

            Are they similar matrix