Question About Intermediate Step in finding a limit
$begingroup$
So I have a question in finding the limit of this sequence:
Let $$a_n :=(4^{10}+n2^n)^frac{1}{n}$$
My attempt:
Take out a factor of n and use the result $(n)^frac{1}{n}to1$ as $ntoinfty$
So we get $$a_n :=(frac{2^{20}}{n}+2^n)^frac{1}{n}$$
Now here is my question, can I use the fact that $lim_{ntoinfty}frac{2^{20}}{n} = 0$
And substitute that into the brack to arrive to the answer of 2?$[(2^n)^frac{1}{n} = 2]$
real-analysis
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So I have a question in finding the limit of this sequence:
Let $$a_n :=(4^{10}+n2^n)^frac{1}{n}$$
My attempt:
Take out a factor of n and use the result $(n)^frac{1}{n}to1$ as $ntoinfty$
So we get $$a_n :=(frac{2^{20}}{n}+2^n)^frac{1}{n}$$
Now here is my question, can I use the fact that $lim_{ntoinfty}frac{2^{20}}{n} = 0$
And substitute that into the brack to arrive to the answer of 2?$[(2^n)^frac{1}{n} = 2]$
real-analysis
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So I have a question in finding the limit of this sequence:
Let $$a_n :=(4^{10}+n2^n)^frac{1}{n}$$
My attempt:
Take out a factor of n and use the result $(n)^frac{1}{n}to1$ as $ntoinfty$
So we get $$a_n :=(frac{2^{20}}{n}+2^n)^frac{1}{n}$$
Now here is my question, can I use the fact that $lim_{ntoinfty}frac{2^{20}}{n} = 0$
And substitute that into the brack to arrive to the answer of 2?$[(2^n)^frac{1}{n} = 2]$
real-analysis
$endgroup$
So I have a question in finding the limit of this sequence:
Let $$a_n :=(4^{10}+n2^n)^frac{1}{n}$$
My attempt:
Take out a factor of n and use the result $(n)^frac{1}{n}to1$ as $ntoinfty$
So we get $$a_n :=(frac{2^{20}}{n}+2^n)^frac{1}{n}$$
Now here is my question, can I use the fact that $lim_{ntoinfty}frac{2^{20}}{n} = 0$
And substitute that into the brack to arrive to the answer of 2?$[(2^n)^frac{1}{n} = 2]$
real-analysis
real-analysis
asked Jan 3 at 19:28
PolynomialCPolynomialC
967
967
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No you are not allowed to take the limit under a power of $n$.
Here is an approach: For $n geq 20$
$a_n =(4^{10}+n2^n)^frac{1}{n}=(2^{20}+n2^n)^frac{1}{n} leq (20.2^{20}+n2^n)^frac{1}{n} leq (n.2^{n}+n2^n)^frac{1}{n} leq (n.2^{n+1})^frac{1}{n}$
and: $(n2^n)^frac{1}{n} leq a_n =(4^{10}+n2^n)^frac{1}{n} $
Now use Squeeze theorem.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, you can’t treat the limits separately.
For a very simple and well-known example demonstrating this, take
$$lim_{n to infty}left(1+frac{x}{n}right)^n = e^x$$
If you treat $frac{x}{n}$ separately and take the limit as $n to infty$, you will get $(1+0)^n = 1^n = 1$, which is incorrect, as the limit equals $e^x$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060908%2fquestion-about-intermediate-step-in-finding-a-limit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No you are not allowed to take the limit under a power of $n$.
Here is an approach: For $n geq 20$
$a_n =(4^{10}+n2^n)^frac{1}{n}=(2^{20}+n2^n)^frac{1}{n} leq (20.2^{20}+n2^n)^frac{1}{n} leq (n.2^{n}+n2^n)^frac{1}{n} leq (n.2^{n+1})^frac{1}{n}$
and: $(n2^n)^frac{1}{n} leq a_n =(4^{10}+n2^n)^frac{1}{n} $
Now use Squeeze theorem.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No you are not allowed to take the limit under a power of $n$.
Here is an approach: For $n geq 20$
$a_n =(4^{10}+n2^n)^frac{1}{n}=(2^{20}+n2^n)^frac{1}{n} leq (20.2^{20}+n2^n)^frac{1}{n} leq (n.2^{n}+n2^n)^frac{1}{n} leq (n.2^{n+1})^frac{1}{n}$
and: $(n2^n)^frac{1}{n} leq a_n =(4^{10}+n2^n)^frac{1}{n} $
Now use Squeeze theorem.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No you are not allowed to take the limit under a power of $n$.
Here is an approach: For $n geq 20$
$a_n =(4^{10}+n2^n)^frac{1}{n}=(2^{20}+n2^n)^frac{1}{n} leq (20.2^{20}+n2^n)^frac{1}{n} leq (n.2^{n}+n2^n)^frac{1}{n} leq (n.2^{n+1})^frac{1}{n}$
and: $(n2^n)^frac{1}{n} leq a_n =(4^{10}+n2^n)^frac{1}{n} $
Now use Squeeze theorem.
$endgroup$
No you are not allowed to take the limit under a power of $n$.
Here is an approach: For $n geq 20$
$a_n =(4^{10}+n2^n)^frac{1}{n}=(2^{20}+n2^n)^frac{1}{n} leq (20.2^{20}+n2^n)^frac{1}{n} leq (n.2^{n}+n2^n)^frac{1}{n} leq (n.2^{n+1})^frac{1}{n}$
and: $(n2^n)^frac{1}{n} leq a_n =(4^{10}+n2^n)^frac{1}{n} $
Now use Squeeze theorem.
answered Jan 3 at 19:47
John11John11
1,0421821
1,0421821
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, you can’t treat the limits separately.
For a very simple and well-known example demonstrating this, take
$$lim_{n to infty}left(1+frac{x}{n}right)^n = e^x$$
If you treat $frac{x}{n}$ separately and take the limit as $n to infty$, you will get $(1+0)^n = 1^n = 1$, which is incorrect, as the limit equals $e^x$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, you can’t treat the limits separately.
For a very simple and well-known example demonstrating this, take
$$lim_{n to infty}left(1+frac{x}{n}right)^n = e^x$$
If you treat $frac{x}{n}$ separately and take the limit as $n to infty$, you will get $(1+0)^n = 1^n = 1$, which is incorrect, as the limit equals $e^x$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, you can’t treat the limits separately.
For a very simple and well-known example demonstrating this, take
$$lim_{n to infty}left(1+frac{x}{n}right)^n = e^x$$
If you treat $frac{x}{n}$ separately and take the limit as $n to infty$, you will get $(1+0)^n = 1^n = 1$, which is incorrect, as the limit equals $e^x$.
$endgroup$
No, you can’t treat the limits separately.
For a very simple and well-known example demonstrating this, take
$$lim_{n to infty}left(1+frac{x}{n}right)^n = e^x$$
If you treat $frac{x}{n}$ separately and take the limit as $n to infty$, you will get $(1+0)^n = 1^n = 1$, which is incorrect, as the limit equals $e^x$.
answered Jan 3 at 19:58
KM101KM101
6,0801525
6,0801525
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060908%2fquestion-about-intermediate-step-in-finding-a-limit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown