Modular transformations of $eta(tau)$
Under a modular transformation the Dedekind $eta$ function transforms as $$eta(-1/tau) = sqrt{-i tau}eta(tau) , .tag*{$(*)$}$$Siegel gives a proof in this paper here that uses complex analytic techniques. However, I am wondering how we can see it in the following fashion. The Dedekind $eta$ function can be represented in the form$$eta(tau) = q^{1/24} prod_{n = 1}^infty (1 - q^n) = sum_{n = -infty}^infty (-1)^n q^{{3over2}(n - 1/6)^2}.$$How can we use the Poisson resummation formula and this representation of the $eta$ function to verify the modular transformation $(*)$?
complex-analysis number-theory analytic-number-theory modular-forms
add a comment |
Under a modular transformation the Dedekind $eta$ function transforms as $$eta(-1/tau) = sqrt{-i tau}eta(tau) , .tag*{$(*)$}$$Siegel gives a proof in this paper here that uses complex analytic techniques. However, I am wondering how we can see it in the following fashion. The Dedekind $eta$ function can be represented in the form$$eta(tau) = q^{1/24} prod_{n = 1}^infty (1 - q^n) = sum_{n = -infty}^infty (-1)^n q^{{3over2}(n - 1/6)^2}.$$How can we use the Poisson resummation formula and this representation of the $eta$ function to verify the modular transformation $(*)$?
complex-analysis number-theory analytic-number-theory modular-forms
Also at first $f(q) = q^{1/24} prod_{n = 1}^infty (1 - q^n)$ and $g(q)= sum_{n = -infty}^infty (-1)^n q^{{3over2}(n - 1/6)^2}$ are different functions. Proving both are modular is a way to show they are equal (obtaining that $(g(q)/f(q))^{24} $ is a weight zero modular form with no poles)
– reuns
Nov 27 '18 at 20:01
add a comment |
Under a modular transformation the Dedekind $eta$ function transforms as $$eta(-1/tau) = sqrt{-i tau}eta(tau) , .tag*{$(*)$}$$Siegel gives a proof in this paper here that uses complex analytic techniques. However, I am wondering how we can see it in the following fashion. The Dedekind $eta$ function can be represented in the form$$eta(tau) = q^{1/24} prod_{n = 1}^infty (1 - q^n) = sum_{n = -infty}^infty (-1)^n q^{{3over2}(n - 1/6)^2}.$$How can we use the Poisson resummation formula and this representation of the $eta$ function to verify the modular transformation $(*)$?
complex-analysis number-theory analytic-number-theory modular-forms
Under a modular transformation the Dedekind $eta$ function transforms as $$eta(-1/tau) = sqrt{-i tau}eta(tau) , .tag*{$(*)$}$$Siegel gives a proof in this paper here that uses complex analytic techniques. However, I am wondering how we can see it in the following fashion. The Dedekind $eta$ function can be represented in the form$$eta(tau) = q^{1/24} prod_{n = 1}^infty (1 - q^n) = sum_{n = -infty}^infty (-1)^n q^{{3over2}(n - 1/6)^2}.$$How can we use the Poisson resummation formula and this representation of the $eta$ function to verify the modular transformation $(*)$?
complex-analysis number-theory analytic-number-theory modular-forms
complex-analysis number-theory analytic-number-theory modular-forms
edited Sep 8 '18 at 19:32
Latrace
517
517
asked Jun 5 '16 at 23:49
user338358
Also at first $f(q) = q^{1/24} prod_{n = 1}^infty (1 - q^n)$ and $g(q)= sum_{n = -infty}^infty (-1)^n q^{{3over2}(n - 1/6)^2}$ are different functions. Proving both are modular is a way to show they are equal (obtaining that $(g(q)/f(q))^{24} $ is a weight zero modular form with no poles)
– reuns
Nov 27 '18 at 20:01
add a comment |
Also at first $f(q) = q^{1/24} prod_{n = 1}^infty (1 - q^n)$ and $g(q)= sum_{n = -infty}^infty (-1)^n q^{{3over2}(n - 1/6)^2}$ are different functions. Proving both are modular is a way to show they are equal (obtaining that $(g(q)/f(q))^{24} $ is a weight zero modular form with no poles)
– reuns
Nov 27 '18 at 20:01
Also at first $f(q) = q^{1/24} prod_{n = 1}^infty (1 - q^n)$ and $g(q)= sum_{n = -infty}^infty (-1)^n q^{{3over2}(n - 1/6)^2}$ are different functions. Proving both are modular is a way to show they are equal (obtaining that $(g(q)/f(q))^{24} $ is a weight zero modular form with no poles)
– reuns
Nov 27 '18 at 20:01
Also at first $f(q) = q^{1/24} prod_{n = 1}^infty (1 - q^n)$ and $g(q)= sum_{n = -infty}^infty (-1)^n q^{{3over2}(n - 1/6)^2}$ are different functions. Proving both are modular is a way to show they are equal (obtaining that $(g(q)/f(q))^{24} $ is a weight zero modular form with no poles)
– reuns
Nov 27 '18 at 20:01
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Let us start from one side of what we want to prove,$$eta(-1/tau) = r^{1/24} prod_{n = 1}^infty (1 - r^n), quad r = expleft(-{{2pi i}overtau}right).$$We were given Euler's (quite remarkable) pentagonal number theorem, so we might as well start by using it to transform the product into a sum$$eta(-1/tau) = r^{1/24} sum_{n in mathbb{Z}} (-1)^n r^{(3n^2 - n)/2}, quad r = expleft(-{{2pi i}overtau}right).$$The other hammer we were given is the Poisson summation, and this expression is beginning to look like the right nail: we just need to a find a function $f$ such that each term in the sum above is $f(n)$, and then Fourier transform it. Rewriting the above expression slightly as$$f(n) = expleft[pi ileft(-{1over{12tau}} + n - {{(3n^2 - n)}overtau}right)right],$$it becomes straightforward to extrapolate it to the reals by simply replacing $n$ with a real number $x$. We can now find the Fourier transform (note that $f$ does fall off "sufficiently fast" because $text{Im},tau > 0$),begin{align*}
tilde{f}(k) & = int_{-infty}^infty dx,expleft[pi ileft(-{1over{12tau}} + x - 2kx - {{(3x^2 - x)}overtau}right)right] \ & = sqrt{tauover{3i}} expleft[pi ileft({{tau(-2k + 1 + {1overtau})^2}over{12}} - {1over{12tau}}right)right] \ & = sqrt{{-itau}over3}expleft[pi ileft({{tau(2k - 1)^2}over{12}} - {{(2k - 1)}over6}right)right],end{align*}where in the first step we used the Gaussian integral$$int_{-infty}^infty dx,exp(-ax^2 + bx + c) = sqrt{piover a} expleft({{b^2}over{4a}} + cright),$$valid for $text{Re},a > 0$, which in our case translates to$$text{Re}left({{3pi i}overtau}right) = text{Im}left(-{{3pi}overtau}right) > 0.$$We can finally use the Poisson summation formula to obtain$$eta(-1/tau) = sqrt{{-itau}over3} sum_{k in mathbb{Z}} expleft[pi ileft({{tau(2k - 1)^2}over{12}} - {{(2k - 1)}over6}right)right].tag*{$(*)$}$$How close is this to the desired result? Let us use the pentagonal number theorem on $eta(tau)$ as well to transform it into a sum$$eta(tau) = q^{1/24} sum_{n in mathbb{Z}} (-1)^n q^{(3n^2 - n)/2} = sum_{n in mathbb{Z}} expleft[pi ileft({{tau(6n - 1)^2}over{12}} + nright)right].$$This is close! However, there is a factor of $sqrt{3}$, and the term proportional to $tau$ in the exponent has $6n - 1$ instead of $2k - 1$. To solve these assorted factors of $3$, we can split the sum in $(*)$ into three sums, with $k = 3l$, $3l + 1$, $3l + 2$. Then$$eta(-1/tau) = sqrt{{{-itau}over3}}sum_{l in mathbb{Z}} left[ expleft[pi ileft({{tau(6l - 1)^2}over{12}} - {{(6l - 1)}over6}right)right] + expleft[pi ileft({{tau(6l + 1)^2}over{12}} - {{(6l + 1)}over6}right)right] + expleft[pi ileft({{tau(6l + 3)^2}over{12}} - {{(6l + 3)}over6}right)right]right].$$The first term looks like the desired expression times $e^{pi i/6}$. In the second term, we can take $l to -l$ to transform it into the desired expression times $e^{-pi i/6}$. Since$$e^{pi i/6} + e^{-pi i/6} = 2cos pi/6 = sqrt{3},$$we have found the full answer and the last term must vanish!
We can rewrite it as a sum over odd integers,$$sum_{m in 2mathbb{Z} + 1} expleft[pi ileft({{3tau m^2}over4} - {mover2}right)right],$$and now separate the positive and negative $m$ parts to find$$sum_{m in 2mathbb{Z} + 1,,m > 0} expleft[pi i{{3tau m^2}over4}right]left(e^{pi im/2} + e^{-pi im/2}right),$$which vanishes since $e^{pi im} = -1$ for $m$ an odd integer.
Therefore, we finally have$$eta(-1/tau) = sqrt{-itau} sum_{l in mathbb{Z}} expleft[pi ileft({{tau(6l - 1)^2}over{12}} - lright)right] = sqrt{-itau}eta(tau),$$as we wanted to show.
3
Very nice presentation (+1)
– Markus Scheuer
Jun 6 '16 at 7:29
1
I think there is a silly error in one of the first steps: when writing the expression for $f(n)$, in the exponent you have the term $-tau/12$, presumably coming from the $r^{1/24}$ factor. But shouldn't this be $-1/12tau$? The error sticks in the integral defining the Fourier transform, but the result in the next line seems to be correct.
– Wojowu
Jun 8 '18 at 12:37
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1815212%2fmodular-transformations-of-eta-tau%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Let us start from one side of what we want to prove,$$eta(-1/tau) = r^{1/24} prod_{n = 1}^infty (1 - r^n), quad r = expleft(-{{2pi i}overtau}right).$$We were given Euler's (quite remarkable) pentagonal number theorem, so we might as well start by using it to transform the product into a sum$$eta(-1/tau) = r^{1/24} sum_{n in mathbb{Z}} (-1)^n r^{(3n^2 - n)/2}, quad r = expleft(-{{2pi i}overtau}right).$$The other hammer we were given is the Poisson summation, and this expression is beginning to look like the right nail: we just need to a find a function $f$ such that each term in the sum above is $f(n)$, and then Fourier transform it. Rewriting the above expression slightly as$$f(n) = expleft[pi ileft(-{1over{12tau}} + n - {{(3n^2 - n)}overtau}right)right],$$it becomes straightforward to extrapolate it to the reals by simply replacing $n$ with a real number $x$. We can now find the Fourier transform (note that $f$ does fall off "sufficiently fast" because $text{Im},tau > 0$),begin{align*}
tilde{f}(k) & = int_{-infty}^infty dx,expleft[pi ileft(-{1over{12tau}} + x - 2kx - {{(3x^2 - x)}overtau}right)right] \ & = sqrt{tauover{3i}} expleft[pi ileft({{tau(-2k + 1 + {1overtau})^2}over{12}} - {1over{12tau}}right)right] \ & = sqrt{{-itau}over3}expleft[pi ileft({{tau(2k - 1)^2}over{12}} - {{(2k - 1)}over6}right)right],end{align*}where in the first step we used the Gaussian integral$$int_{-infty}^infty dx,exp(-ax^2 + bx + c) = sqrt{piover a} expleft({{b^2}over{4a}} + cright),$$valid for $text{Re},a > 0$, which in our case translates to$$text{Re}left({{3pi i}overtau}right) = text{Im}left(-{{3pi}overtau}right) > 0.$$We can finally use the Poisson summation formula to obtain$$eta(-1/tau) = sqrt{{-itau}over3} sum_{k in mathbb{Z}} expleft[pi ileft({{tau(2k - 1)^2}over{12}} - {{(2k - 1)}over6}right)right].tag*{$(*)$}$$How close is this to the desired result? Let us use the pentagonal number theorem on $eta(tau)$ as well to transform it into a sum$$eta(tau) = q^{1/24} sum_{n in mathbb{Z}} (-1)^n q^{(3n^2 - n)/2} = sum_{n in mathbb{Z}} expleft[pi ileft({{tau(6n - 1)^2}over{12}} + nright)right].$$This is close! However, there is a factor of $sqrt{3}$, and the term proportional to $tau$ in the exponent has $6n - 1$ instead of $2k - 1$. To solve these assorted factors of $3$, we can split the sum in $(*)$ into three sums, with $k = 3l$, $3l + 1$, $3l + 2$. Then$$eta(-1/tau) = sqrt{{{-itau}over3}}sum_{l in mathbb{Z}} left[ expleft[pi ileft({{tau(6l - 1)^2}over{12}} - {{(6l - 1)}over6}right)right] + expleft[pi ileft({{tau(6l + 1)^2}over{12}} - {{(6l + 1)}over6}right)right] + expleft[pi ileft({{tau(6l + 3)^2}over{12}} - {{(6l + 3)}over6}right)right]right].$$The first term looks like the desired expression times $e^{pi i/6}$. In the second term, we can take $l to -l$ to transform it into the desired expression times $e^{-pi i/6}$. Since$$e^{pi i/6} + e^{-pi i/6} = 2cos pi/6 = sqrt{3},$$we have found the full answer and the last term must vanish!
We can rewrite it as a sum over odd integers,$$sum_{m in 2mathbb{Z} + 1} expleft[pi ileft({{3tau m^2}over4} - {mover2}right)right],$$and now separate the positive and negative $m$ parts to find$$sum_{m in 2mathbb{Z} + 1,,m > 0} expleft[pi i{{3tau m^2}over4}right]left(e^{pi im/2} + e^{-pi im/2}right),$$which vanishes since $e^{pi im} = -1$ for $m$ an odd integer.
Therefore, we finally have$$eta(-1/tau) = sqrt{-itau} sum_{l in mathbb{Z}} expleft[pi ileft({{tau(6l - 1)^2}over{12}} - lright)right] = sqrt{-itau}eta(tau),$$as we wanted to show.
3
Very nice presentation (+1)
– Markus Scheuer
Jun 6 '16 at 7:29
1
I think there is a silly error in one of the first steps: when writing the expression for $f(n)$, in the exponent you have the term $-tau/12$, presumably coming from the $r^{1/24}$ factor. But shouldn't this be $-1/12tau$? The error sticks in the integral defining the Fourier transform, but the result in the next line seems to be correct.
– Wojowu
Jun 8 '18 at 12:37
add a comment |
Let us start from one side of what we want to prove,$$eta(-1/tau) = r^{1/24} prod_{n = 1}^infty (1 - r^n), quad r = expleft(-{{2pi i}overtau}right).$$We were given Euler's (quite remarkable) pentagonal number theorem, so we might as well start by using it to transform the product into a sum$$eta(-1/tau) = r^{1/24} sum_{n in mathbb{Z}} (-1)^n r^{(3n^2 - n)/2}, quad r = expleft(-{{2pi i}overtau}right).$$The other hammer we were given is the Poisson summation, and this expression is beginning to look like the right nail: we just need to a find a function $f$ such that each term in the sum above is $f(n)$, and then Fourier transform it. Rewriting the above expression slightly as$$f(n) = expleft[pi ileft(-{1over{12tau}} + n - {{(3n^2 - n)}overtau}right)right],$$it becomes straightforward to extrapolate it to the reals by simply replacing $n$ with a real number $x$. We can now find the Fourier transform (note that $f$ does fall off "sufficiently fast" because $text{Im},tau > 0$),begin{align*}
tilde{f}(k) & = int_{-infty}^infty dx,expleft[pi ileft(-{1over{12tau}} + x - 2kx - {{(3x^2 - x)}overtau}right)right] \ & = sqrt{tauover{3i}} expleft[pi ileft({{tau(-2k + 1 + {1overtau})^2}over{12}} - {1over{12tau}}right)right] \ & = sqrt{{-itau}over3}expleft[pi ileft({{tau(2k - 1)^2}over{12}} - {{(2k - 1)}over6}right)right],end{align*}where in the first step we used the Gaussian integral$$int_{-infty}^infty dx,exp(-ax^2 + bx + c) = sqrt{piover a} expleft({{b^2}over{4a}} + cright),$$valid for $text{Re},a > 0$, which in our case translates to$$text{Re}left({{3pi i}overtau}right) = text{Im}left(-{{3pi}overtau}right) > 0.$$We can finally use the Poisson summation formula to obtain$$eta(-1/tau) = sqrt{{-itau}over3} sum_{k in mathbb{Z}} expleft[pi ileft({{tau(2k - 1)^2}over{12}} - {{(2k - 1)}over6}right)right].tag*{$(*)$}$$How close is this to the desired result? Let us use the pentagonal number theorem on $eta(tau)$ as well to transform it into a sum$$eta(tau) = q^{1/24} sum_{n in mathbb{Z}} (-1)^n q^{(3n^2 - n)/2} = sum_{n in mathbb{Z}} expleft[pi ileft({{tau(6n - 1)^2}over{12}} + nright)right].$$This is close! However, there is a factor of $sqrt{3}$, and the term proportional to $tau$ in the exponent has $6n - 1$ instead of $2k - 1$. To solve these assorted factors of $3$, we can split the sum in $(*)$ into three sums, with $k = 3l$, $3l + 1$, $3l + 2$. Then$$eta(-1/tau) = sqrt{{{-itau}over3}}sum_{l in mathbb{Z}} left[ expleft[pi ileft({{tau(6l - 1)^2}over{12}} - {{(6l - 1)}over6}right)right] + expleft[pi ileft({{tau(6l + 1)^2}over{12}} - {{(6l + 1)}over6}right)right] + expleft[pi ileft({{tau(6l + 3)^2}over{12}} - {{(6l + 3)}over6}right)right]right].$$The first term looks like the desired expression times $e^{pi i/6}$. In the second term, we can take $l to -l$ to transform it into the desired expression times $e^{-pi i/6}$. Since$$e^{pi i/6} + e^{-pi i/6} = 2cos pi/6 = sqrt{3},$$we have found the full answer and the last term must vanish!
We can rewrite it as a sum over odd integers,$$sum_{m in 2mathbb{Z} + 1} expleft[pi ileft({{3tau m^2}over4} - {mover2}right)right],$$and now separate the positive and negative $m$ parts to find$$sum_{m in 2mathbb{Z} + 1,,m > 0} expleft[pi i{{3tau m^2}over4}right]left(e^{pi im/2} + e^{-pi im/2}right),$$which vanishes since $e^{pi im} = -1$ for $m$ an odd integer.
Therefore, we finally have$$eta(-1/tau) = sqrt{-itau} sum_{l in mathbb{Z}} expleft[pi ileft({{tau(6l - 1)^2}over{12}} - lright)right] = sqrt{-itau}eta(tau),$$as we wanted to show.
3
Very nice presentation (+1)
– Markus Scheuer
Jun 6 '16 at 7:29
1
I think there is a silly error in one of the first steps: when writing the expression for $f(n)$, in the exponent you have the term $-tau/12$, presumably coming from the $r^{1/24}$ factor. But shouldn't this be $-1/12tau$? The error sticks in the integral defining the Fourier transform, but the result in the next line seems to be correct.
– Wojowu
Jun 8 '18 at 12:37
add a comment |
Let us start from one side of what we want to prove,$$eta(-1/tau) = r^{1/24} prod_{n = 1}^infty (1 - r^n), quad r = expleft(-{{2pi i}overtau}right).$$We were given Euler's (quite remarkable) pentagonal number theorem, so we might as well start by using it to transform the product into a sum$$eta(-1/tau) = r^{1/24} sum_{n in mathbb{Z}} (-1)^n r^{(3n^2 - n)/2}, quad r = expleft(-{{2pi i}overtau}right).$$The other hammer we were given is the Poisson summation, and this expression is beginning to look like the right nail: we just need to a find a function $f$ such that each term in the sum above is $f(n)$, and then Fourier transform it. Rewriting the above expression slightly as$$f(n) = expleft[pi ileft(-{1over{12tau}} + n - {{(3n^2 - n)}overtau}right)right],$$it becomes straightforward to extrapolate it to the reals by simply replacing $n$ with a real number $x$. We can now find the Fourier transform (note that $f$ does fall off "sufficiently fast" because $text{Im},tau > 0$),begin{align*}
tilde{f}(k) & = int_{-infty}^infty dx,expleft[pi ileft(-{1over{12tau}} + x - 2kx - {{(3x^2 - x)}overtau}right)right] \ & = sqrt{tauover{3i}} expleft[pi ileft({{tau(-2k + 1 + {1overtau})^2}over{12}} - {1over{12tau}}right)right] \ & = sqrt{{-itau}over3}expleft[pi ileft({{tau(2k - 1)^2}over{12}} - {{(2k - 1)}over6}right)right],end{align*}where in the first step we used the Gaussian integral$$int_{-infty}^infty dx,exp(-ax^2 + bx + c) = sqrt{piover a} expleft({{b^2}over{4a}} + cright),$$valid for $text{Re},a > 0$, which in our case translates to$$text{Re}left({{3pi i}overtau}right) = text{Im}left(-{{3pi}overtau}right) > 0.$$We can finally use the Poisson summation formula to obtain$$eta(-1/tau) = sqrt{{-itau}over3} sum_{k in mathbb{Z}} expleft[pi ileft({{tau(2k - 1)^2}over{12}} - {{(2k - 1)}over6}right)right].tag*{$(*)$}$$How close is this to the desired result? Let us use the pentagonal number theorem on $eta(tau)$ as well to transform it into a sum$$eta(tau) = q^{1/24} sum_{n in mathbb{Z}} (-1)^n q^{(3n^2 - n)/2} = sum_{n in mathbb{Z}} expleft[pi ileft({{tau(6n - 1)^2}over{12}} + nright)right].$$This is close! However, there is a factor of $sqrt{3}$, and the term proportional to $tau$ in the exponent has $6n - 1$ instead of $2k - 1$. To solve these assorted factors of $3$, we can split the sum in $(*)$ into three sums, with $k = 3l$, $3l + 1$, $3l + 2$. Then$$eta(-1/tau) = sqrt{{{-itau}over3}}sum_{l in mathbb{Z}} left[ expleft[pi ileft({{tau(6l - 1)^2}over{12}} - {{(6l - 1)}over6}right)right] + expleft[pi ileft({{tau(6l + 1)^2}over{12}} - {{(6l + 1)}over6}right)right] + expleft[pi ileft({{tau(6l + 3)^2}over{12}} - {{(6l + 3)}over6}right)right]right].$$The first term looks like the desired expression times $e^{pi i/6}$. In the second term, we can take $l to -l$ to transform it into the desired expression times $e^{-pi i/6}$. Since$$e^{pi i/6} + e^{-pi i/6} = 2cos pi/6 = sqrt{3},$$we have found the full answer and the last term must vanish!
We can rewrite it as a sum over odd integers,$$sum_{m in 2mathbb{Z} + 1} expleft[pi ileft({{3tau m^2}over4} - {mover2}right)right],$$and now separate the positive and negative $m$ parts to find$$sum_{m in 2mathbb{Z} + 1,,m > 0} expleft[pi i{{3tau m^2}over4}right]left(e^{pi im/2} + e^{-pi im/2}right),$$which vanishes since $e^{pi im} = -1$ for $m$ an odd integer.
Therefore, we finally have$$eta(-1/tau) = sqrt{-itau} sum_{l in mathbb{Z}} expleft[pi ileft({{tau(6l - 1)^2}over{12}} - lright)right] = sqrt{-itau}eta(tau),$$as we wanted to show.
Let us start from one side of what we want to prove,$$eta(-1/tau) = r^{1/24} prod_{n = 1}^infty (1 - r^n), quad r = expleft(-{{2pi i}overtau}right).$$We were given Euler's (quite remarkable) pentagonal number theorem, so we might as well start by using it to transform the product into a sum$$eta(-1/tau) = r^{1/24} sum_{n in mathbb{Z}} (-1)^n r^{(3n^2 - n)/2}, quad r = expleft(-{{2pi i}overtau}right).$$The other hammer we were given is the Poisson summation, and this expression is beginning to look like the right nail: we just need to a find a function $f$ such that each term in the sum above is $f(n)$, and then Fourier transform it. Rewriting the above expression slightly as$$f(n) = expleft[pi ileft(-{1over{12tau}} + n - {{(3n^2 - n)}overtau}right)right],$$it becomes straightforward to extrapolate it to the reals by simply replacing $n$ with a real number $x$. We can now find the Fourier transform (note that $f$ does fall off "sufficiently fast" because $text{Im},tau > 0$),begin{align*}
tilde{f}(k) & = int_{-infty}^infty dx,expleft[pi ileft(-{1over{12tau}} + x - 2kx - {{(3x^2 - x)}overtau}right)right] \ & = sqrt{tauover{3i}} expleft[pi ileft({{tau(-2k + 1 + {1overtau})^2}over{12}} - {1over{12tau}}right)right] \ & = sqrt{{-itau}over3}expleft[pi ileft({{tau(2k - 1)^2}over{12}} - {{(2k - 1)}over6}right)right],end{align*}where in the first step we used the Gaussian integral$$int_{-infty}^infty dx,exp(-ax^2 + bx + c) = sqrt{piover a} expleft({{b^2}over{4a}} + cright),$$valid for $text{Re},a > 0$, which in our case translates to$$text{Re}left({{3pi i}overtau}right) = text{Im}left(-{{3pi}overtau}right) > 0.$$We can finally use the Poisson summation formula to obtain$$eta(-1/tau) = sqrt{{-itau}over3} sum_{k in mathbb{Z}} expleft[pi ileft({{tau(2k - 1)^2}over{12}} - {{(2k - 1)}over6}right)right].tag*{$(*)$}$$How close is this to the desired result? Let us use the pentagonal number theorem on $eta(tau)$ as well to transform it into a sum$$eta(tau) = q^{1/24} sum_{n in mathbb{Z}} (-1)^n q^{(3n^2 - n)/2} = sum_{n in mathbb{Z}} expleft[pi ileft({{tau(6n - 1)^2}over{12}} + nright)right].$$This is close! However, there is a factor of $sqrt{3}$, and the term proportional to $tau$ in the exponent has $6n - 1$ instead of $2k - 1$. To solve these assorted factors of $3$, we can split the sum in $(*)$ into three sums, with $k = 3l$, $3l + 1$, $3l + 2$. Then$$eta(-1/tau) = sqrt{{{-itau}over3}}sum_{l in mathbb{Z}} left[ expleft[pi ileft({{tau(6l - 1)^2}over{12}} - {{(6l - 1)}over6}right)right] + expleft[pi ileft({{tau(6l + 1)^2}over{12}} - {{(6l + 1)}over6}right)right] + expleft[pi ileft({{tau(6l + 3)^2}over{12}} - {{(6l + 3)}over6}right)right]right].$$The first term looks like the desired expression times $e^{pi i/6}$. In the second term, we can take $l to -l$ to transform it into the desired expression times $e^{-pi i/6}$. Since$$e^{pi i/6} + e^{-pi i/6} = 2cos pi/6 = sqrt{3},$$we have found the full answer and the last term must vanish!
We can rewrite it as a sum over odd integers,$$sum_{m in 2mathbb{Z} + 1} expleft[pi ileft({{3tau m^2}over4} - {mover2}right)right],$$and now separate the positive and negative $m$ parts to find$$sum_{m in 2mathbb{Z} + 1,,m > 0} expleft[pi i{{3tau m^2}over4}right]left(e^{pi im/2} + e^{-pi im/2}right),$$which vanishes since $e^{pi im} = -1$ for $m$ an odd integer.
Therefore, we finally have$$eta(-1/tau) = sqrt{-itau} sum_{l in mathbb{Z}} expleft[pi ileft({{tau(6l - 1)^2}over{12}} - lright)right] = sqrt{-itau}eta(tau),$$as we wanted to show.
edited Nov 27 '18 at 19:45
Dzoooks
846316
846316
answered Jun 6 '16 at 2:27
user345872
117419
117419
3
Very nice presentation (+1)
– Markus Scheuer
Jun 6 '16 at 7:29
1
I think there is a silly error in one of the first steps: when writing the expression for $f(n)$, in the exponent you have the term $-tau/12$, presumably coming from the $r^{1/24}$ factor. But shouldn't this be $-1/12tau$? The error sticks in the integral defining the Fourier transform, but the result in the next line seems to be correct.
– Wojowu
Jun 8 '18 at 12:37
add a comment |
3
Very nice presentation (+1)
– Markus Scheuer
Jun 6 '16 at 7:29
1
I think there is a silly error in one of the first steps: when writing the expression for $f(n)$, in the exponent you have the term $-tau/12$, presumably coming from the $r^{1/24}$ factor. But shouldn't this be $-1/12tau$? The error sticks in the integral defining the Fourier transform, but the result in the next line seems to be correct.
– Wojowu
Jun 8 '18 at 12:37
3
3
Very nice presentation (+1)
– Markus Scheuer
Jun 6 '16 at 7:29
Very nice presentation (+1)
– Markus Scheuer
Jun 6 '16 at 7:29
1
1
I think there is a silly error in one of the first steps: when writing the expression for $f(n)$, in the exponent you have the term $-tau/12$, presumably coming from the $r^{1/24}$ factor. But shouldn't this be $-1/12tau$? The error sticks in the integral defining the Fourier transform, but the result in the next line seems to be correct.
– Wojowu
Jun 8 '18 at 12:37
I think there is a silly error in one of the first steps: when writing the expression for $f(n)$, in the exponent you have the term $-tau/12$, presumably coming from the $r^{1/24}$ factor. But shouldn't this be $-1/12tau$? The error sticks in the integral defining the Fourier transform, but the result in the next line seems to be correct.
– Wojowu
Jun 8 '18 at 12:37
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1815212%2fmodular-transformations-of-eta-tau%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Also at first $f(q) = q^{1/24} prod_{n = 1}^infty (1 - q^n)$ and $g(q)= sum_{n = -infty}^infty (-1)^n q^{{3over2}(n - 1/6)^2}$ are different functions. Proving both are modular is a way to show they are equal (obtaining that $(g(q)/f(q))^{24} $ is a weight zero modular form with no poles)
– reuns
Nov 27 '18 at 20:01