composition of finite rank projection and bounded operator
If $Pin B(H)$ is a finite rank projection,we assume the rank is $n$,I know the fact $PB(H)Pcong M_n(mathbb{C})$,but how to construct the isomorphism?
operator-theory operator-algebras c-star-algebras von-neumann-algebras
add a comment |
If $Pin B(H)$ is a finite rank projection,we assume the rank is $n$,I know the fact $PB(H)Pcong M_n(mathbb{C})$,but how to construct the isomorphism?
operator-theory operator-algebras c-star-algebras von-neumann-algebras
I think this is pretty much the same as the result that is usually taken for granted, that there is a 1:1 corresponsance between the set of linear transformation on a finite dimensional vector space and their matrix 'representations' (set of matrices of corresponding size).
– AnyAD
Nov 27 '18 at 22:33
add a comment |
If $Pin B(H)$ is a finite rank projection,we assume the rank is $n$,I know the fact $PB(H)Pcong M_n(mathbb{C})$,but how to construct the isomorphism?
operator-theory operator-algebras c-star-algebras von-neumann-algebras
If $Pin B(H)$ is a finite rank projection,we assume the rank is $n$,I know the fact $PB(H)Pcong M_n(mathbb{C})$,but how to construct the isomorphism?
operator-theory operator-algebras c-star-algebras von-neumann-algebras
operator-theory operator-algebras c-star-algebras von-neumann-algebras
asked Nov 27 '18 at 22:19
mathrookie
811512
811512
I think this is pretty much the same as the result that is usually taken for granted, that there is a 1:1 corresponsance between the set of linear transformation on a finite dimensional vector space and their matrix 'representations' (set of matrices of corresponding size).
– AnyAD
Nov 27 '18 at 22:33
add a comment |
I think this is pretty much the same as the result that is usually taken for granted, that there is a 1:1 corresponsance between the set of linear transformation on a finite dimensional vector space and their matrix 'representations' (set of matrices of corresponding size).
– AnyAD
Nov 27 '18 at 22:33
I think this is pretty much the same as the result that is usually taken for granted, that there is a 1:1 corresponsance between the set of linear transformation on a finite dimensional vector space and their matrix 'representations' (set of matrices of corresponding size).
– AnyAD
Nov 27 '18 at 22:33
I think this is pretty much the same as the result that is usually taken for granted, that there is a 1:1 corresponsance between the set of linear transformation on a finite dimensional vector space and their matrix 'representations' (set of matrices of corresponding size).
– AnyAD
Nov 27 '18 at 22:33
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Let $x_1,ldots,x_n$ be an orthonormal basis of $PH$. Write $P=sum_{j=1}^n P_{jj}$, where $P_j$ is the orthogonal projection onto $mathbb C x_j$, i.e., $P_{jj}x=langle x,x_jrangle,x_j$. Let $P_{kj}$ be the rank-one operator that takes $x_j$ to $x_k$, i.e. $P_{kj}x=langle x,x_jrangle,x_k$.
Given any $Tin B(H)$, the operator $P_kTP_j$ is rank-one, and maps $x_j$ to $x_k$. We have $$
P_kTP_jx=langle TP_jx,x_krangle,x_k=langle Tx_j,x_krangle ,langle x,x_jrangle,x_k=langle Tx_j,x_krangle,P_{kj}x.
$$
So
$$tag1
PTP=sum_{k,j}P_kTP_j=sum_{k,j}langle Tx_j,x_krangle,P_{kj}.
$$
We also have
$$tag2
P_{kj}P_{ab}x=langle x,x_brangle P_{kj}x_a=langle x,x_brangle,langle x_a,x_jrangle,x_k=delta_{a,j},langle x,x_brangle, x_k=delta_{a,j},P_{kb}x.
$$
Given $Ain M_n(mathbb C)$, we write $A=sum_{k,j} A_{kj},E_{kj}$, where ${E_{kj}}$ are the canonical matrix units. Define $Gamma:M_n(mathbb C)to PB(H)P$ by
$$
Gamma(A)=sum_{k,j} A_{kj},P_{kj}.
$$
It is easy to see that this is one-to-one, $*$-preserving, and linear. It is onto by $(1)$. And, using $(2)$,
begin{align}
Gamma(AB)&=sum_{k,j} (AB)_{kj},P_{kj}=sum_{k,j}sum_{ell} A_{kell}B_{ell j},P_{kj}=sum_{k,j}sum_{ell,m} A_{kell}B_{m j},P_{kell}P_{m j}\ \
&=left(sum_{k,ell} A_{kell} ,P_{kell}right)
left(sum_{j,m} B_{mj} ,P_{mj}right)
=Gamma(A)Gamma(B).
end{align}
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016383%2fcomposition-of-finite-rank-projection-and-bounded-operator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Let $x_1,ldots,x_n$ be an orthonormal basis of $PH$. Write $P=sum_{j=1}^n P_{jj}$, where $P_j$ is the orthogonal projection onto $mathbb C x_j$, i.e., $P_{jj}x=langle x,x_jrangle,x_j$. Let $P_{kj}$ be the rank-one operator that takes $x_j$ to $x_k$, i.e. $P_{kj}x=langle x,x_jrangle,x_k$.
Given any $Tin B(H)$, the operator $P_kTP_j$ is rank-one, and maps $x_j$ to $x_k$. We have $$
P_kTP_jx=langle TP_jx,x_krangle,x_k=langle Tx_j,x_krangle ,langle x,x_jrangle,x_k=langle Tx_j,x_krangle,P_{kj}x.
$$
So
$$tag1
PTP=sum_{k,j}P_kTP_j=sum_{k,j}langle Tx_j,x_krangle,P_{kj}.
$$
We also have
$$tag2
P_{kj}P_{ab}x=langle x,x_brangle P_{kj}x_a=langle x,x_brangle,langle x_a,x_jrangle,x_k=delta_{a,j},langle x,x_brangle, x_k=delta_{a,j},P_{kb}x.
$$
Given $Ain M_n(mathbb C)$, we write $A=sum_{k,j} A_{kj},E_{kj}$, where ${E_{kj}}$ are the canonical matrix units. Define $Gamma:M_n(mathbb C)to PB(H)P$ by
$$
Gamma(A)=sum_{k,j} A_{kj},P_{kj}.
$$
It is easy to see that this is one-to-one, $*$-preserving, and linear. It is onto by $(1)$. And, using $(2)$,
begin{align}
Gamma(AB)&=sum_{k,j} (AB)_{kj},P_{kj}=sum_{k,j}sum_{ell} A_{kell}B_{ell j},P_{kj}=sum_{k,j}sum_{ell,m} A_{kell}B_{m j},P_{kell}P_{m j}\ \
&=left(sum_{k,ell} A_{kell} ,P_{kell}right)
left(sum_{j,m} B_{mj} ,P_{mj}right)
=Gamma(A)Gamma(B).
end{align}
add a comment |
Let $x_1,ldots,x_n$ be an orthonormal basis of $PH$. Write $P=sum_{j=1}^n P_{jj}$, where $P_j$ is the orthogonal projection onto $mathbb C x_j$, i.e., $P_{jj}x=langle x,x_jrangle,x_j$. Let $P_{kj}$ be the rank-one operator that takes $x_j$ to $x_k$, i.e. $P_{kj}x=langle x,x_jrangle,x_k$.
Given any $Tin B(H)$, the operator $P_kTP_j$ is rank-one, and maps $x_j$ to $x_k$. We have $$
P_kTP_jx=langle TP_jx,x_krangle,x_k=langle Tx_j,x_krangle ,langle x,x_jrangle,x_k=langle Tx_j,x_krangle,P_{kj}x.
$$
So
$$tag1
PTP=sum_{k,j}P_kTP_j=sum_{k,j}langle Tx_j,x_krangle,P_{kj}.
$$
We also have
$$tag2
P_{kj}P_{ab}x=langle x,x_brangle P_{kj}x_a=langle x,x_brangle,langle x_a,x_jrangle,x_k=delta_{a,j},langle x,x_brangle, x_k=delta_{a,j},P_{kb}x.
$$
Given $Ain M_n(mathbb C)$, we write $A=sum_{k,j} A_{kj},E_{kj}$, where ${E_{kj}}$ are the canonical matrix units. Define $Gamma:M_n(mathbb C)to PB(H)P$ by
$$
Gamma(A)=sum_{k,j} A_{kj},P_{kj}.
$$
It is easy to see that this is one-to-one, $*$-preserving, and linear. It is onto by $(1)$. And, using $(2)$,
begin{align}
Gamma(AB)&=sum_{k,j} (AB)_{kj},P_{kj}=sum_{k,j}sum_{ell} A_{kell}B_{ell j},P_{kj}=sum_{k,j}sum_{ell,m} A_{kell}B_{m j},P_{kell}P_{m j}\ \
&=left(sum_{k,ell} A_{kell} ,P_{kell}right)
left(sum_{j,m} B_{mj} ,P_{mj}right)
=Gamma(A)Gamma(B).
end{align}
add a comment |
Let $x_1,ldots,x_n$ be an orthonormal basis of $PH$. Write $P=sum_{j=1}^n P_{jj}$, where $P_j$ is the orthogonal projection onto $mathbb C x_j$, i.e., $P_{jj}x=langle x,x_jrangle,x_j$. Let $P_{kj}$ be the rank-one operator that takes $x_j$ to $x_k$, i.e. $P_{kj}x=langle x,x_jrangle,x_k$.
Given any $Tin B(H)$, the operator $P_kTP_j$ is rank-one, and maps $x_j$ to $x_k$. We have $$
P_kTP_jx=langle TP_jx,x_krangle,x_k=langle Tx_j,x_krangle ,langle x,x_jrangle,x_k=langle Tx_j,x_krangle,P_{kj}x.
$$
So
$$tag1
PTP=sum_{k,j}P_kTP_j=sum_{k,j}langle Tx_j,x_krangle,P_{kj}.
$$
We also have
$$tag2
P_{kj}P_{ab}x=langle x,x_brangle P_{kj}x_a=langle x,x_brangle,langle x_a,x_jrangle,x_k=delta_{a,j},langle x,x_brangle, x_k=delta_{a,j},P_{kb}x.
$$
Given $Ain M_n(mathbb C)$, we write $A=sum_{k,j} A_{kj},E_{kj}$, where ${E_{kj}}$ are the canonical matrix units. Define $Gamma:M_n(mathbb C)to PB(H)P$ by
$$
Gamma(A)=sum_{k,j} A_{kj},P_{kj}.
$$
It is easy to see that this is one-to-one, $*$-preserving, and linear. It is onto by $(1)$. And, using $(2)$,
begin{align}
Gamma(AB)&=sum_{k,j} (AB)_{kj},P_{kj}=sum_{k,j}sum_{ell} A_{kell}B_{ell j},P_{kj}=sum_{k,j}sum_{ell,m} A_{kell}B_{m j},P_{kell}P_{m j}\ \
&=left(sum_{k,ell} A_{kell} ,P_{kell}right)
left(sum_{j,m} B_{mj} ,P_{mj}right)
=Gamma(A)Gamma(B).
end{align}
Let $x_1,ldots,x_n$ be an orthonormal basis of $PH$. Write $P=sum_{j=1}^n P_{jj}$, where $P_j$ is the orthogonal projection onto $mathbb C x_j$, i.e., $P_{jj}x=langle x,x_jrangle,x_j$. Let $P_{kj}$ be the rank-one operator that takes $x_j$ to $x_k$, i.e. $P_{kj}x=langle x,x_jrangle,x_k$.
Given any $Tin B(H)$, the operator $P_kTP_j$ is rank-one, and maps $x_j$ to $x_k$. We have $$
P_kTP_jx=langle TP_jx,x_krangle,x_k=langle Tx_j,x_krangle ,langle x,x_jrangle,x_k=langle Tx_j,x_krangle,P_{kj}x.
$$
So
$$tag1
PTP=sum_{k,j}P_kTP_j=sum_{k,j}langle Tx_j,x_krangle,P_{kj}.
$$
We also have
$$tag2
P_{kj}P_{ab}x=langle x,x_brangle P_{kj}x_a=langle x,x_brangle,langle x_a,x_jrangle,x_k=delta_{a,j},langle x,x_brangle, x_k=delta_{a,j},P_{kb}x.
$$
Given $Ain M_n(mathbb C)$, we write $A=sum_{k,j} A_{kj},E_{kj}$, where ${E_{kj}}$ are the canonical matrix units. Define $Gamma:M_n(mathbb C)to PB(H)P$ by
$$
Gamma(A)=sum_{k,j} A_{kj},P_{kj}.
$$
It is easy to see that this is one-to-one, $*$-preserving, and linear. It is onto by $(1)$. And, using $(2)$,
begin{align}
Gamma(AB)&=sum_{k,j} (AB)_{kj},P_{kj}=sum_{k,j}sum_{ell} A_{kell}B_{ell j},P_{kj}=sum_{k,j}sum_{ell,m} A_{kell}B_{m j},P_{kell}P_{m j}\ \
&=left(sum_{k,ell} A_{kell} ,P_{kell}right)
left(sum_{j,m} B_{mj} ,P_{mj}right)
=Gamma(A)Gamma(B).
end{align}
answered Nov 28 '18 at 1:08
Martin Argerami
124k1176174
124k1176174
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016383%2fcomposition-of-finite-rank-projection-and-bounded-operator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I think this is pretty much the same as the result that is usually taken for granted, that there is a 1:1 corresponsance between the set of linear transformation on a finite dimensional vector space and their matrix 'representations' (set of matrices of corresponding size).
– AnyAD
Nov 27 '18 at 22:33